CryptosNewss

Polkadot has taken a major technical step forward with the launch of its native smart contracts hub, marking one of the network’s most meaningful upgrades in recent months. The update is designed to make Polkadot faster, more user-friendly, and more attractive to developers.
Yet despite the significance of the rollout, DOT’s price has barely moved, leaving investors questioning whether fundamentals alone are enough to reignite momentum.
A Technical Milestone for the Polkadot Network
The newly launched smart contracts hub arrived via a major runtime upgrade, aimed at improving the way applications operate on Polkadot. According to the team, the focus is on smoother user experiences, faster transaction confirmations, and app interactions that feel closer to familiar Web2 platforms.
For developers, this represents a notable shift. Instead of spending time navigating complex protocol mechanics, builders can now focus on shipping products. Shorter development cycles and simpler tooling could make Polkadot more competitive in attracting real-world applications.
Just as importantly, the upgrade introduces changes to Polkadot’s token economics. DOT will now have a fixed maximum supply of 2.1 billion tokens, with inflation expected to decline over time. In theory, this could strengthen DOT’s long-term value proposition.
Why the Market Isn’t Celebrating Yet
Despite these structural improvements, traders remain cautious. At the time of writing, DOT was trading near $1.87, slipping around 0.05% on the hourly chart. Price action remains choppy, with a brief move toward $1.89 failing to establish any follow-through.
Technical indicators reflect this hesitation. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) sits near 53, firmly in neutral territory, suggesting neither buyers nor sellers have control. Meanwhile, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) stands at approximately 0.13, indicating modest inflows but nothing close to breakout-level conviction.
Derivatives data tells a similar story. Aggregated Open Interest has held steady around $90.3 million, signaling that traders are maintaining existing positions rather than adding fresh leverage. Funding Rates, averaging about -0.0033, remain slightly negative, meaning shorts are paying longs, a sign of subdued bullish confidence.
Fundamentals vs. Timing
The disconnect between Polkadot’s technological progress and DOT’s price highlights a broader market reality. Major upgrades often take time to translate into user growth, developer adoption, and sustained network activity. Traders appear unwilling to price in long-term benefits without clearer evidence of rising demand.
In short, the upgrade may be strategically important, but the market wants confirmation.
What Comes Next for DOT?
If Polkadot’s smart contracts hub succeeds in attracting developers and driving meaningful application usage, DOT could eventually benefit from both increased utility and improved token economics. However, in the near term, price action suggests traders are waiting for either stronger volume, clearer trend confirmation, or broader market support before committing.
For now, Polkadot has delivered on technology, but the token market remains in observation mode.
The post appeared first on CryptosNewss.com
#Polkadot $DOT

$33M ETH moved to Tornado Cash has reignited concerns around illicit financial flows in the crypto ecosystem after blockchain monitoring firm Pie Shield flagged a large Ethereum transfer linked to a suspected hacker known as John (Lick).
According to Pie Shield monitoring reports, 11,037 ETH, valued at approximately $33 million, was deposited into Tornado Cash. The funds are believed to be connected to a 2024 theft involving U.S. government assets, raising fresh alarms across the industry.
While Ethereum transactions are transparent by design, mixers like Tornado Cash complicate tracking efforts, once again placing privacy tools at the center of a regulatory and security debate.
Why the $33M ETH Tornado Cash Transfer Matters
The scale and timing of the transfer stand out. Moving such a large amount through a crypto mixer suggests a deliberate attempt to obscure fund origins, a pattern frequently associated with high-profile hacks and state-level investigations.
Security analysts warn that lower transaction costs on Ethereum have made address obfuscation strategies more economically viable. With reduced fees, malicious actors can now execute complex laundering patterns at a fraction of the previous cost.
This development reinforces calls for stronger on-chain monitoring, especially as mixers continue to operate at the edge of regulatory frameworks.
Tornado Cash and the Rising Risk of Sanctions Pressure
The Tornado Cash protocol has faced scrutiny before, and incidents like this could intensify pressure on regulators to revisit enforcement strategies against crypto privacy tools.
Industry observers note that repeated high-value cases risk accelerating sanctions, compliance mandates, or outright restrictions on mixer-related infrastructure. While privacy advocates argue these tools are neutral, regulators increasingly focus on their misuse rather than their intent.
Analysts suggest that future policy responses may target not only mixers themselves, but also wallet providers, exchanges, and bridges interacting with them.
Ethereum Market Context Amid Security Scrutiny
Despite the controversy, Ethereum’s market position remains resilient.
As of January 28, 2026, Ethereum (ETH) was priced at $3,005.07, posting a 24-hour gain of 2.33%, according to CoinMarketCap. With a circulating supply of 120,694,435.10 ETH, Ethereum’s market capitalization stands at approximately $362.70 billion.
This highlights a key tension in the crypto market, strong asset fundamentals coexisting with persistent security and compliance challenges.
What Comes Next for Crypto Compliance
Researchers at Coincu noted that incidents like the $33M ETH moved to Tornado Cash could accelerate tighter compliance frameworks across the industry. Exchanges may face stricter transaction monitoring requirements, while users could see increased friction when interacting with privacy-focused protocols.
Rather than slowing adoption, analysts believe this phase could push crypto toward a more mature structure, where transparency, security, and regulation coexist with innovation.
The long-term outcome will likely shape how Ethereum and other major blockchains balance privacy with accountability.
The post appeared first on CryptosNewss.com
#TornadoCash. #Ethereum $ETH

ARK Invest ir uzsācis 2026. gadu ar skaidru signālu tirgiem. Kamēr kriptovalūtu cenas paliek svārstīgas, Kathi Vudas firma pozicionē sevi tam, ko tā uzskata par nākamo ilgtermiņa digitālās finanses izaugsmes fāzi. 23. janvārī ARK uzsāka jaunus darījumus vairākās lielās kriptovalūtu saistītās akcijās, nostiprinot savu pārliecību, ka infrastruktūras spēlētāji gūs labumu neatkarīgi no īstermiņa svārstībām.
Tā vietā, lai ķertos pie tokeniem, ARK turpina koncentrēties uz uzņēmumiem, kas veido kriptovalūtu ekonomikas infrastruktūru. Šī stratēģija ir noteikusi firmas pieeju cauri vairākiem tirgus cikliem un vēlreiz nonāca uzmanības centrā ar tās jaunākajām iegādēm.

Bitcoin is once again testing investor conviction as prices slide below critical support levels, raising the risk of a deeper correction toward the mid-$80,000 range. While short-term recovery attempts are forming, the broader structure still favors caution as sellers maintain control below key resistance.
After failing to hold above $89,000, Bitcoin extended its decline and slipped under $88,500, accelerating losses across intraday trading. The move pushed BTC briefly below $86,500, with a local low forming at $86,007 before buyers stepped in. This bounce, however, has so far lacked follow-through.
Why this price zone matters
The current range is important because it sits at the intersection of technical and psychological support. Bitcoin is now trading below both $88,200 and the 100-hour Simple Moving Average, a signal that short-term momentum remains tilted to the downside.
According to data from Kraken, a new bearish trend line has formed with resistance near $88,000 on the hourly BTC/USD chart. This level is acting as a ceiling, preventing any sustained recovery and reinforcing bearish pressure.
Early recovery attempts, limited confidence
From the $86,000 area, Bitcoin managed a modest rebound, reclaiming the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement of the decline from the $91,099 swing high to the $86,007 low. While this move suggests dip-buying interest, it has not yet shifted market structure.
For bulls, the real test lies higher. The $88,500 zone, aligned with the 50% Fibonacci retracement, remains the first major barrier. A clean close above this level could open the door to $89,200, followed by a psychological test of $90,000. Beyond that, resistance sits near $91,000 and $91,500, levels that previously failed to hold.
Until then, rallies are likely to be treated as relief moves rather than trend reversals.
Breakdown risk still in play
If Bitcoin fails to reclaim $88,500, downside risks increase. Immediate support is seen near $86,700, followed by a stronger base at $86,200. A loss of that zone could quickly expose the $85,500 level, where bears appear increasingly focused.
Should selling pressure intensify, analysts are watching $83,500 and $82,500 as deeper supports. A move into that range would likely trigger broader market reassessment and renewed volatility across altcoins.
What the indicators are signaling
Momentum indicators reinforce the cautious outlook. The hourly MACD is losing strength but remains in bearish territory, suggesting sellers are still dominant even as downside momentum slows. Meanwhile, the Relative Strength Index is below the 50 mark, highlighting weak bullish conviction.
From a market structure perspective, Bitcoin is consolidating losses rather than building a clear base. That typically precedes either a sharp continuation move or a volatility-driven fakeout.
Looking ahead
This phase reflects a market caught between macro uncertainty and technical fragility. Until Bitcoin decisively reclaims $88,500, the risk of a slide toward $85,000 remains real. For longer-term participants, the coming sessions will help determine whether this is a healthy reset or the early stage of a deeper correction.
The post appeared first on CryptosNewss.com
#btc70k #BitcoinForecast $BTC

Bitcoin’s long-standing four-year market rhythm may be approaching a turning point. Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, widely known as CZ, believes the world’s largest cryptocurrency is heading toward a “supercycle,” driven largely by a sharp shift in US political and regulatory sentiment.
Speaking during an interview with CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, CZ said he strongly believes that 2026 could mark a structural break from Bitcoin’s historical price behavior. In his view, increasing institutional and political support from the United States under President Donald Trump is changing the long-term dynamics of the crypto market.
Why this moment matters for Bitcoin
Traditionally, Bitcoin has followed a four-year cycle closely tied to its halving events. Prices typically rise into and after a halving, followed by a prolonged correction. Because Bitcoin dominates the crypto market, its movements often set the tone for the entire sector.
CZ argues that this pattern may no longer fully apply. With the US now openly backing crypto innovation, and other nations beginning to follow that lead, Bitcoin could transition from a speculative cycle-driven asset into something closer to a long-term macro instrument.
If that shift plays out, it would fundamentally alter how investors model risk, timing, and valuation in the crypto market.
2026 as an inflection point
During the Davos interview, CZ stated clearly, “I strongly believe that 2026 will likely be a supercycle for Bitcoin.” While he avoided giving a specific price target, his confidence centered on structural adoption rather than short-term price momentum.
Other industry leaders have been less reserved. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has floated a $180,000 Bitcoin target, while BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes has suggested $200,000. CZ, however, emphasized time horizon over numbers, noting that over a five to ten-year period, Bitcoin’s upward trajectory appears increasingly predictable.
From his perspective, regulatory clarity and institutional participation matter more than any single bull run.
Politics, perception, and controversy
CZ’s comments come amid ongoing speculation about his relationship with President Donald Trump. During the CNBC interview, Zhao firmly denied any personal or business connection related to crypto activities, despite rumors circulating within the industry.
“There really isn’t any connection,” Zhao said, explaining that the overlap between Binance and the Trump administration is purely sector-wide. According to him, the Trump family’s involvement in crypto and the administration’s supportive stance benefit all companies operating in the space, not just Binance.
Still, questions resurfaced after reports revealed that Abu Dhabi-based investment firm MGX allocated roughly $2 billion to Binance using the USD1 stablecoin. That stablecoin is issued by World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a decentralized finance platform backed by Donald Trump and his family.
CZ addresses the speculation directly
Zhao responded to the reports by calling the situation a misunderstanding. He explained that MGX is an independent investor that chose to use USD1 after he requested crypto-based payments, citing his personal dislike of working with banks.
He also clarified that he has never met or spoken directly with Trump. The closest interaction, according to CZ, was being approximately 30 to 40 feet away from the US president at Davos earlier this week. He did, however, express gratitude for Trump’s decision to pardon him last October, a move that raised eyebrows across both political and crypto circles.
What this could mean for the next cycle
If Bitcoin does enter a supercycle, the implications extend beyond price. A sustained pro-crypto stance from the US could accelerate institutional adoption, normalize Bitcoin as a portfolio hedge, and reduce the dominance of speculative retail-driven rallies.
At the same time, breaking the four-year cycle would challenge many existing trading strategies and valuation models. Long-term conviction could begin to outweigh short-term timing, pushing Bitcoin closer to the role CZ appears to envision: a globally relevant financial asset shaped by policy, not just code.
The post appeared first on CryptosNewss.com

#Binance #Changpeng.Zhao $BTC

Ethereum’s base layer is showing unexpected strength again. In January, the Ethereum mainnet recorded more daily active addresses than all major layer-2 networks combined, marking a notable shift in on-chain behavior after months of layer-2 dominance.
According to data shared by Token Terminal on Thursday, Ethereum has seen a clear “return to mainnet.” Daily active addresses on Ethereum now exceed activity levels on popular scaling networks such as Arbitrum One, Base Chain, and OP Mainnet.
This surge is happening at a time when gas fees on Ethereum remain historically low, largely due to the Fusaka upgrade rolled out in December. Lower transaction costs have reduced the friction that once pushed users toward layer-2 solutions, making mainnet transactions viable again for smaller transfers and routine activity.
Activity spike raises questions about user quality
On-chain data shows that Ethereum’s daily active addresses climbed close to 1 million earlier this month. Etherscan recorded a peak of approximately 1.3 million active addresses on January 16, before activity cooled to around 945,000 addresses per day.
While those figures place Ethereum ahead of every layer-2 network, analysts caution that not all of this activity represents genuine user engagement.
Security researchers point to a rise in address poisoning and dusting attacks as a meaningful contributor to the spike. These attacks involve sending small transactions from wallet addresses designed to visually resemble legitimate ones, increasing the chance that users mistakenly copy and reuse the wrong address.
Low fees create new attack incentives
Andrey Sergeenkov, a blockchain security researcher, noted earlier this week that Ethereum’s reduced fees have unintentionally made such spam-based attacks more economical. When transaction costs are low, attackers can flood the network with minimal expense.
Blockchain security firm Cyvers reinforced this view in comments to Cointelegraph on Wednesday. Their analysts said behavioral analysis and statistical correlations strongly indicate that address poisoning campaigns are not a marginal factor but a significant driver of recent Ethereum transaction volume.
This highlights a familiar tradeoff in blockchain design. Lower fees improve usability but also reduce the economic barriers that previously limited network spam and abuse.
Layer-2 growth slows as capital consolidates
The resurgence of Ethereum mainnet activity comes as the broader layer-2 ecosystem shows signs of cooling. According to L2Beat, the total value secured across all layer-2 networks currently stands at $45 billion, down 17% over the past 12 months.
This does not signal failure for layer-2s, but it does suggest that user behavior remains fluid. When mainnet costs fall, some activity naturally migrates back, especially for users who prioritize simplicity, liquidity, or direct interaction with core Ethereum infrastructure.
Ethereum’s dominance in tokenized assets remains intact
Despite questions around transaction quality, Ethereum’s role as the primary settlement layer for digital assets remains largely unchallenged.
ARK Invest reported on Wednesday that Ethereum continues to be the preferred blockchain for on-chain assets, with more than $400 billion in value currently secured on the network. The firm estimates that the global market for tokenized assets could exceed $11 trillion by 2030.
Stablecoins account for the majority of this activity. Data from RWA.xyz shows Ethereum holds a 56% share of stablecoins issued on-chain and a 66% share of tokenized real-world assets when layer-2 networks are included.
What this means going forward
The January activity surge underscores Ethereum’s adaptability. As scaling upgrades reduce costs, the network can reabsorb activity without relying entirely on layer-2s. At the same time, the rise in address poisoning highlights the need for better wallet UX, transaction warnings, and security tooling.
For investors, developers, and institutions, the message is clear. Ethereum’s base layer is far from obsolete. Even as layer-2s evolve, the mainnet remains the center of liquidity, asset issuance, and long-term value settlement in the crypto economy.
The post appeared first on CryptosNewss.com
#Ethereum #Layer2 $ETH

The divide between traditional banking and crypto may not last much longer. According to David Sacks, the White House AI and Crypto Czar, the United States is approaching a turning point where banks and crypto firms will no longer operate as rival systems, but as one unified digital asset industry.
Sacks shared this view during an interview on CNBC’s Squawk Box, recorded on Wednesday, January 21, alongside the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. His remarks arrive at a critical moment, as lawmakers, banks, and crypto companies battle over the final shape of US crypto regulation.
At the center of the debate is the proposed CLARITY Act, a long-awaited market structure bill designed to define how digital assets and stablecoins should operate in the US financial system.
Why this moment matters for crypto and banks
Sacks believes the approval of the CLARITY Act would act as a catalyst. Once passed, he argues, banks would fully enter the crypto space, erasing the boundary between traditional finance and blockchain-based firms.
In his words, the future does not involve parallel systems. Instead, banking and crypto would converge into a single digital asset industry, with stablecoins, tokenized assets, and regulated financial institutions operating under the same framework.
This matters because regulatory clarity has been the single biggest barrier keeping major banks from deeper crypto involvement. Without clear rules, most large institutions have stayed cautious, limiting crypto exposure to custody pilots or blockchain experiments.
Banks push back as competition fears grow
The path forward is far from smooth. Sacks’ comments come as banks have intensified lobbying efforts to protect their business models. The American Bankers Association, the main trade group for US banks, disclosed spending more than $2 million in its final 2025 lobbying report, including efforts tied directly to the CLARITY Act.
Banks are attempting to add language to the bill that would prevent stablecoins from offering yield, a feature crypto firms argue is essential to innovation. From the banking side, the concern is clear. If stablecoins offer attractive returns, customers could move funds away from low-interest savings accounts, putting pressure on bank margins.
This clash explains why the legislation has stalled, despite months of support from the crypto industry.
Sacks urges compromise over perfection
When asked about the delays surrounding the CLARITY Act, Sacks acknowledged that the debate over stablecoin yield has slowed progress. Still, he urged lawmakers and industry leaders to focus on the bigger picture.
He pointed out that the GENIUS Act faced similar resistance before eventually becoming law. In July 2025, that bill prohibited token issuers from directly offering stablecoin yields. However, it still allowed third-party firms such as Coinbase to legally provide rewards, creating a workaround that preserved innovation without fully sidelining banks.
Sacks stressed that yield is already addressed within existing legislation and should not derail the broader goal of establishing market structure. For him, passing the bill is more important than winning every policy detail.
Crypto industry fractures add uncertainty
The situation became more complicated last week when Coinbase withdrew support for the CLARITY Act. CEO Brian Armstrong publicly criticized the current version, saying it contained too many issues, including provisions he believes protect banks from competition while limiting stablecoin innovation.
This split within the crypto industry weakens its negotiating position at a time when banks are united and well-funded in Washington.
What happens if the bill passes
If the CLARITY Act is approved and sent to US President Donald Trump for signature, the long-term implications could be significant.
Banks would gain regulatory confidence to issue stablecoins, offer on-chain settlement, and integrate blockchain infrastructure into everyday financial products. Crypto firms, in turn, would gain access to traditional payment rails, compliance clarity, and institutional capital.
Over time, Sacks believes banks will come to appreciate yield-bearing stablecoins once they are participants rather than observers. That shift could redefine how savings, payments, and digital dollars work in the US economy.
For now, uncertainty remains. But one message from the White House is clear. Washington no longer sees crypto as an outsider. It sees it as the next evolution of banking itself.
The post appeared first on CryptosNewss.com
#BTC100kNext? $BTC

Ethereum izkļūšana zem $3,000 atzīmes ir vairāk nekā rutīnas atkāpšanās. Tā iezīmē maiņu īstermiņa tirgus kontroles.
Pēc tam, kad neizdevās noturēties virs $3,200, ETH iekļuva straujā lejupvērstā korekcijā, atspoguļojot plašāku vājumu kriptovalūtu tirgos. Kustība zem galvenā psiholoģiskā līmeņa ir likusi tirgotājiem būt modriem, it īpaši, kad svārstīgums sāk samazināties.
Kāpēc $3,200 noraidījums ir svarīgs
Noraidījums netālu no $3,200 bija izšķirošs. Šī līmeņa bija rīkojusies kā griesti pēdējās sesijās un pārstāvēja jomu, kur pārdevēji skaidri bija gatavi.

Bitcoin cena, kas ir samazinājusies zem $93,000, var izskatīties negatīvi pirmajā mirklī. Bet zem virsmas tirgus struktūra klusi uzlabojas.
Saskaņā ar Glassnode, iekšējās tirdzniecības dinamika stabilizējas, pat ja virsrakstos joprojām dominē makro nenoteiktība un ģeopolitiskie riski.
Šī novirze starp cenu un on-chain datiem bieži parādās tuvu svarīgiem pagrieziena punktiem.
Spot tirgus dati rāda agru dziedināšanu
Glassnode ziņoja par "mērenu" pieaugumu spot Bitcoin tirdzniecības apjomā, kamēr neto pirkšanas–pārdošanas nelīdzsvarotība ir pārkāpusi tās augšējo statistisko joslu.

Bitcoin pēkšņais kritums zem $92,500 tiek vainots pie pieaugošajām ASV-ES tirdzniecības kara bailēm. Bet pārdošanas ātrums atklāj kaut ko svarīgāku.
Kriptonauda ne tikai reaģē uz ģeopolitiku. Tā parāda strukturālu vājumu brīdī, kad tradicionālie tirgi paliek izturīgi.
Šis kontrasts ir svarīgs, jo tas atklāj, cik trausla ir kriptonaudas noskaņa pēc mēnešiem ilgas konsolidācijas.
Asu pārdošanu signāls tirgum uz malas
Saskaņā ar The Block bitcoin cenas lapu, Bitcoin krita no $95,500 plkst. 17:00 ET svētdien līdz $92,474 līdz plkst. 21:00, 3% kritums tikai dažu stundu laikā.

Ethereum šobrīd sūta pretrunīgus signālus, kas mulsina īstermiņa tirgotājus, bet uzbudina ilgtermiņa investorus. Kamēr cena paliek iesprostota ap $3,300, pati tīkls klusi kļūst arvien vairāk iestrādāts globālajā finansē.
Šī spriedze starp vājiem kapitāla plūsmām un stiprinātajiem pamatiem nav neizdošanās pazīme. Tā ir pārejas pazīme.
Tirgus bieži nepareizi novērtē aktīvus strukturālo izmaiņu laikā, un Ethereum šobrīd šķiet, ka atrodas šajā fāzē.
Kāpēc ETH cena ir iesprūdusi, neskatoties uz spēcīgākiem pamatiem

Azijskie tirgi atvērās piektdien ar skaidru sadalījumu kustībā. Kamēr reģiona akcijas auga, pamudinātas atkal uzplaukušā entuziasma pret mākslīgo intelektu, Bitcoin palika ap $95 000 līmeni, atspoguļojot mierīgāku toni visā kriptotirgū.
Pauze nenozīmē vājumu. Tā gan norāda, ka Bitcoin arvien vairāk reaģē atšķirīgi no akcijām, pat tad, kad pastāv plaša riska apetīte. Tirdzniecības dalībnieki šķiet ērti uzturēt pozīcijas, nevis meklēt augšu, kas liecina par pašpārliecību, nevis piesardzību.

Bitcoin parāda atjaunotu spēku, pieaugot līdz apmēram 97 000 ASV dolāriem un sasniedzot augstāko līmeni gandrīz divos mēnešos. Kas padara šo kustību pievilcīgu, nav tikai cena, bet arī laiks.
ASV akciju tirgi cīnījās pēc jaunām inflācijas datiem, kas pārsteidza uz augšu. Taču Bitcoin kustējās pretējā virzienā, nostiprinot savu pieaugošo tendenci tirdzniecībā neatkarīgi no tradicionālajiem riska aktīviem svarīgās makroekonomiskās brīdīs.
Šī atkari ir kļūst arvien grūtāk ignorējama investoriem.
Inflācijas dati neizdevās samazināt Bitcoin pieprasījumu

Solana klusi pārvarēja svarīgu ierobežojumu. Pēdējās 24 stundās tā nemainīgās nākotnes darījumu apjoms pārsniedza Ethereum, liekot saprast nelielu, taču nozīmīgu mainīgumu tirdzniecības uzvedībā.
Lai arī apjoma atšķirība ir maza, sekas ir lielākas. Tirdzniecības veicēji, kas meklē ātru, atslēgtu iespēju, arvien vairāk izvēlas Solanu, nekā Ethereum, īstermiņa pozīciju veidošanai.
Ātrums, zemākas darījumu izmaksas un asāka volatilitāte turpina darboties par labu Solanai, īpaši derivātu tirgos, kur izpildes efektivitāte ir svarīgākā.

PayPal Holdings Inc. formāli ir pieteikusies kļūt par ASV harta banku, signalizējot par lielu stratēģisku maiņu, jo fintech un kripto saistītie uzņēmumi arvien vairāk pāriet uz tradicionālo banku sektoru.
Maksājumu gigants apstiprināja, ka ir iesniedzis rakstisku pieteikumu Federālajai noguldījumu apdrošināšanas korporācijai (FDIC) un Jūtas Finanšu iestāžu departamentam, lai izveidotu Jūtas harta industriālo aizdevumu uzņēmumu, kas tiks nosaukts par PayPal Bank.
PayPal mērķi aizdevumu paplašināšanai un noguldījumiem
PayPal izpilddirektors Aleks Chriss teica, ka šis solis ir vērsts uz uzņēmuma spēju stiprināšanu, lai atbalstītu mazās uzņēmumus, no kuriem daudzi joprojām saskaras ar kapitāla ierobežojumiem.

Ethereum cena ir samazinājusies pēc tam, kad neizdevās saglabāt momentu virs $3,180, pievēršot jaunu uzmanību $3,000 atbalsta zonai, kamēr tirgus dalībnieki izvērtē nākamo soli.
Pēc tam, kad tas sasniedza maksimumu netālu no $3,250, Ether iekļuva lejupvērstā korekcijā, atspoguļojot plašāku vājumu kriptovalūtu tirgū. Atgriešanās spieda ETH zem $3,150 un $3,120, apstiprinot īstermiņa medvju fāzi.
Ethereum atrod pagaidu atbalstu netālu no $3,026
Pārdošanas spiediens īslaicīgi pastiprinājās, virzot Ethereum uz $3,000 psiholoģisko līmeni, kur pircēji iejaucās, lai ierobežotu tālākos zaudējumus. Saskaņā ar Kraken tirgus datiem, ETH izveidoja īstermiņa zemu līmeni pie $3,026 pirms neliela atleciena.

Bitcoin cenas dinamika joprojām ir pakļauta spiedienam pēc straujas korekcijas no nesenajiem augstajiem rādītājiem, ar BTC, kas cīnās, lai atgūtu pamatu virs kritiskā $90,000 līmeņa, jo tehniskā pretestība pieaug.
Pēc tam, kad neizdevās saglabāt ieguvumus virs $92,000 un $92,500, Bitcoin uzsāka lejupejošu kustību, kas noveda pie cenu samazināšanās zem $90,500 atbalsta zonas, norādot uz vājāku bullish spēku īstermiņā.
Bitcoin atsakās, bet atrod atbalstu netālu no $87,500
Pārdošana īslaicīgi pastiprinājās, virzot BTC zem $88,000, kur pircēji iejaucās, lai aizsargātu leju. Saskaņā ar tirgus datiem no Kraken, Bitcoin izveidoja īstermiņa zemu rādītāju pie $87,582 pirms neliela atgūšanās.

Blokķēdes maksājumu uzņēmums Copperx ir paziņojis par gaidāmo Kosh palaišanu, Solana darbinātu digitālo banku, kas paredzēta brīvmāksliniekiem un maziem un vidējiem uzņēmumiem (MVU), iezīmējot vēl vienu soli Solana virzībā uz reālo finanšu pakalpojumu jomu.
Paziņojums tika izdarīts 12. decembrī Solana Breakpoint konferencē, kur Copperx izklāstīja savu redzējumu par bezrobežu, bezmaksas banku infrastruktūras nodrošināšanu globāli izplatītiem uzņēmumiem un neatkarīgiem profesionāļiem.
Kosh mērķis ir vienkāršot globālo banku pakalpojumu nodrošināšanu MVU

Stabilās monētas izsniedzējs Tether ir veicis drosmīgu soli Eiropas futbolā, iesniedzot $1 miljardu (1.1 miljardu eiro) visu naudas piedāvājumu, lai iegādātos Itālijas futbola milzi Juventus Football Club, saskaņā ar piektdien izlaistu uzņēmuma paziņojumu. Priekšlikums ir vērsts uz Exor, Agnelli ģimenes holdinga uzņēmumu, kas kontrolē klubu.
Tether apstiprināja, ka ir iesniegusi saistošu piedāvājumu par Exor 65.4% kontrolējošo daļu, kuru ģimene ir turējusi vairāk nekā gadsimtu. Saskaņā ar priekšlikumu Tether teica, ka tā arī uzsāks publisku piedāvājumu iegādāties visas atlikušās Juventus akcijas par to pašu novērtējumu.