Bitcoin remains range-bound as it struggles to reclaim $90,000. This zone continues to reject price and is reinforced by strong technical signals like the POC (Point of Control) and the 0.618 Fibonacci level.
BTC is still trading within the higher range of $97,500 to $80,500 and is currently near the middle around $87,000, which usually results in slow movement and low volatility.
Key support is at $85,500. If it holds, sideways action is likely. If it breaks on a close, price could drift toward $80,500.
Bitcoin reste bloqué sous les 88 000 $ alors que les ETF BTC spot continuent d’enregistrer d’importantes sorties de capitaux.
Au cours des cinq derniers jours de bourse, les ETF Bitcoin ont cumulé plus de 825 millions de dollars de sorties nettes. Le 24 décembre, les sorties ont atteint 175,29 M$, et aucun ETF n’a enregistré d’entrées. IBIT a mené les sorties avec 91,37 M$, soit la plus forte baisse sur une seule journée.
Les acteurs du marché restent également prudents à l’approche de la grande expiration des options Deribit du 26 décembre, représentant environ 23,6 milliards de dollars de valeur notionnelle.
BTC continue d’évoluer dans une fourchette comprise entre 86 000 $ et 88 000 $, avec 85 200 $ comme niveau de support clé à surveiller de près.
Selon vous, ces sorties des ETF sont-elles principalement liées aux ajustements de fin d’année, vacances et fiscalité, ou assistons-nous à un véritable ralentissement de la demande ?
Bitcoin remains capped below $88K as spot BTC ETFs continue to see heavy outflows.
Over the past five trading days, Bitcoin ETFs have recorded more than $825M in cumulative outflows. On December 24, net outflows totaled $175.29M, with no ETF posting any inflows. IBIT led the declines, seeing the largest single-day outflow at $91.37M.
Market participants are also staying cautious ahead of the major Deribit options expiry on December 26, involving roughly $23.6B in notional value.
BTC continues to trade within a $86K–$88K range, with $85,200 standing out as the key support level to monitor closely.
Do you think these ETF outflows are mostly driven by holiday positioning and tax-related adjustments, or are we starting to see a real slowdown in demand?
Market projections indicate the sector could expand from $149 billion in 2024 to more than $4.4 trillion by 2034. These platforms execute banking operations directly on blockchains, eliminating the need for legacy banking infrastructure.
This approach enables instant global payments, fully transparent records, and 24/7 accessibility without the constraints of traditional banking hours or borders.
As more financial services move on-chain, neobanks are poised to extend beyond payments into savings, asset management, and global capital movement.
This is a transformation where software is systematically replacing legacy finance.
Gold Approaches a Critical Monetary Threshold as #bitcoin Defends Key Support
When adjusted for U.S. money supply, gold is once again pressing into a level that has defined major inflection points for decades. This zone capped price action in 2011 and was last decisively surpassed during the high-inflation environment of the late 1970s.
Bitcoin, frequently framed as digital gold, is instead retracing toward a structurally important support area. This zone aligns with both the April macro-driven selloff and the prior cycle high reached earlier this year, reinforcing its significance.
Gold’s advance signals intensifying concern over currency debasement and long-term monetary credibility. Bitcoin’s current positioning reflects cyclical consolidation rather than a breakdown of its broader structural trend.
Both assets are responding to the same monetary reality—through different mechanisms and at different stages of the cycle.
Trump Media Actively Managing Its Bitcoin Holdings
Trump Media transferred approximately $174M in BTC between wallets just a day after increasing its bitcoin balance. A small portion was moved to Coinbase Prime Custody, while the majority remained under the control of the same entity.
Movements of this nature typically indicate treasury management rather than selling. Custody solutions are designed for secure, long-term storage, not for immediate market activity.
Bitcoin’s price remained largely unchanged following the transfer, signaling that the market interpreted this activity as neutral.
The main insight is the presence of institutional-style bitcoin management, rather than speculative trading behavior.
Bitcoin’s $70K–$80K zone stands out as one of the least developed price areas in its historical structure.
Over the past five years, BTC spent minimal time trading in this range, meaning fewer positions were established and structural support remains thin. Data from Glassnode also shows low supply concentration across the same levels.
If price revisits this area, the market may need time to build acceptance and consolidation before it can function as a reliable base.
Sustainable trends are formed where price actively trades and builds volume.
Bitcoin holding between $85,000 and $90,000 for most of December has less to do with sentiment and more to do with derivatives structure.
Heavy options exposure near spot forced market makers to hedge aggressively, buying dips and selling rallies. This behavior suppressed volatility and locked price into a narrow corridor, even as macro conditions improved and risk assets moved higher.
That dynamic changes as year-end options expire. With roughly $27B in open interest rolling off and a strong call bias still in place, the hedging pressure that pinned price fades quickly.
Implied volatility remains near monthly lows, suggesting the market is underpricing movement just as structural constraints are removed.
When positioning dominates price for weeks, the resolution often comes fast once those constraints disappear.
Why Markets Are Choosing Gold and Copper Over Bitcoin in 2025
This year’s market behavior tells a clear story. Investors are prioritizing assets they can touch, store, and rely on when confidence in financial systems weakens or when growth demands real infrastructure.
Gold has surged as fears around fiscal sustainability, currency debasement, and political instability intensify. Copper has followed, driven by the AI boom, electrification, and global infrastructure build-out. Both assets represent tangibility in a world questioning paper promises.
Bitcoin, despite being positioned as both digital gold and high-end tech, has not captured either flow. Institutions have largely priced in ETFs and regulatory clarity, while sovereigns continue to favor gold as their hedge of choice.
This divergence does not necessarily mean Bitcoin has lost relevance. Historically, gold tends to lead during periods of monetary stress, with Bitcoin reacting later and often with greater volatility.
The current market is not rejecting crypto. It is demanding proof, patience, and timing.
Pieraksties, lai skatītu citu saturu
Uzzini jaunākās kriptovalūtu ziņas
⚡️ Iesaisties jaunākajās diskusijās par kriptovalūtām
💬 Mijiedarbojies ar saviem iemīļotākajiem satura veidotājiem