Binance Square
Clemo_Shots
11 Publikācijas

Clemo_Shots

3 YEARS OF ACTIVE CRYPTO TRADING GUESS WHAT?
Atvērts tirdzniecības darījums
Tirgo bieži
2.4 gadi
7 Seko
7 Sekotāji
8 Patika
Publikācijas
Portfelis
·
--
Pozitīvs
Skatīt tulkojumu
{future}(CUSDT) 0.50 ,🛡️💥 GUY'S 💗 LOOKS 0.47 📉 → 0.098 DEAD STAGE 💀💹 FAST Buy Now HOLD 🛡️ 2x TO 5X 💫 •Tp 🔸0.106 🔸0.1156 🔸0.1300
0.50 ,🛡️💥
GUY'S 💗 LOOKS 0.47 📉 → 0.098 DEAD STAGE 💀💹 FAST Buy Now HOLD 🛡️ 2x TO 5X 💫 •Tp 🔸0.106 🔸0.1156 🔸0.1300
·
--
Pozitīvs
Skatīt tulkojumu
positive4crypto
·
--
JAUNUMI:

MAIKLS SEILORS TIKKO TEICA DZĪVI CNBCA, KA BITCOINS IR PAKLUSIS PIE $60,000 UN MŪSU PEŠA IR TUVU PARABOLISKAI AUGŠUPEJAI DRĪZ.
🔥

"MŪS PĀRCEĻAS UZ PAVASARI."

"MŪS ŠEIT UZPLUDINĀS."
🚀
Skatīt tulkojumu
AI exposed a massive flaw in top crypto network and experts warn banks could be next.$ZEC {spot}(ZECUSDT) Taylor Hornby, who uncovered the Orchard flaw that sent Zcash down 38%, says other privacy coins are on his list too.(Source: Coindesk) What to know: Security engineer Taylor Hornby, who recently used Anthropic’s Opus 4.8 AI model to uncover a critical bug in Zcash, says he will next audit Monero and other privacy-focused cryptocurrencies.The Zcash flaw, hidden in the Orchard privacy pool since May 2022, could have allowed unlimited counterfeit ZEC to be minted undetected and prompted an emergency fix by June 1 after its discovery on May 29.Hornby, hired by nonprofit developer Shielded Labs to find protocol bugs before attackers do, disclosed the vulnerability instead of exploiting it and plans to seek a Zcash coinholder grant to fund further work. Taylor Hornby, the security engineer who used Anthropic's Opus 4.8 AI model to find a critical bug in Zcash, says privacy coin Monero is among the tokens he intends to audit next. Asked on X whether he could look for flaws in Monero and other private cryptocurrencies, Hornby replied, "Absolutely! I'll add Monero to my queue of things to audit." Monero, which trades under the ticker XMR, is among the largest privacy-focused cryptocurrency and hides transaction details by default compared to Zcash, where users can either either transparent or shielded addressed. Hornby found the Zcash flaw on May 29. The bug, in the blockchain's Orchard privacy pool, had gone undetected since May 2022 and could have let an attacker mint unlimited, undetectable counterfeit ZEC. Shielded Labs, a nonprofit developer on the network, disclosed it on Thursday and pushed through an emergency fix by June 1. Zcash fell 38% over the following 24 hours amid fallout and concerns about a hacker possibly stealing money from the shielded pool - without leaving any detectable trace - over the past few years. Hornby, hired by Shielded Labs in April to find protocol bugs before attackers could, said he reported the flaw rather than exploit it because the Zcash developers were "like family" and he could "not live with that kind of betrayal." He plans to apply for a Zcash coinholder grant to fund further work. Sentiment & Market View Investor Fear: The Zcash flaw highlights the fragility of privacy coins — confidence can collapse overnight if hidden bugs surface.Community Respect: Hornby’s ethical disclosure (choosing not to exploit) earned trust, but also exposed how dependent these ecosystems are on individual researchers.Monero Risk Premium: Traders expect heightened volatility around Monero as audits begin; XMR may face speculative sell‑offs or cautious accumulation.Macro Context: Privacy coins already face regulatory pressure; technical flaws compound the perception of risk. My Take Short‑Term Bearish: ZEC’s credibility damage will linger; Monero could see speculative downside as audits raise uncertainty.Long‑Term Neutral‑Bullish: If Hornby’s audits strengthen Monero’s security, it may emerge as the most trusted privacy coin, attracting institutional interest.Lesson for Traders: Always factor protocol audits into risk management — hidden bugs can be more devastating than price volatility. #ZEC/USDT

AI exposed a massive flaw in top crypto network and experts warn banks could be next.

$ZEC
Taylor Hornby, who uncovered the Orchard flaw that sent Zcash down 38%, says other privacy coins are on his list too.(Source: Coindesk)
What to know:
Security engineer Taylor Hornby, who recently used Anthropic’s Opus 4.8 AI model to uncover a critical bug in Zcash, says he will next audit Monero and other privacy-focused cryptocurrencies.The Zcash flaw, hidden in the Orchard privacy pool since May 2022, could have allowed unlimited counterfeit ZEC to be minted undetected and prompted an emergency fix by June 1 after its discovery on May 29.Hornby, hired by nonprofit developer Shielded Labs to find protocol bugs before attackers do, disclosed the vulnerability instead of exploiting it and plans to seek a Zcash coinholder grant to fund further work.
Taylor Hornby, the security engineer who used Anthropic's Opus 4.8 AI model to find a critical bug in Zcash, says privacy coin Monero is among the tokens he intends to audit next.
Asked on X whether he could look for flaws in Monero and other private cryptocurrencies, Hornby replied, "Absolutely! I'll add Monero to my queue of things to audit."
Monero, which trades under the ticker XMR, is among the largest privacy-focused cryptocurrency and hides transaction details by default compared to Zcash, where users can either either transparent or shielded addressed.
Hornby found the Zcash flaw on May 29. The bug, in the blockchain's Orchard privacy pool, had gone undetected since May 2022 and could have let an attacker mint unlimited, undetectable counterfeit ZEC. Shielded Labs, a nonprofit developer on the network, disclosed it on Thursday and pushed through an emergency fix by June 1.
Zcash fell 38% over the following 24 hours amid fallout and concerns about a hacker possibly stealing money from the shielded pool - without leaving any detectable trace - over the past few years.
Hornby, hired by Shielded Labs in April to find protocol bugs before attackers could, said he reported the flaw rather than exploit it because the Zcash developers were "like family" and he could "not live with that kind of betrayal."
He plans to apply for a Zcash coinholder grant to fund further work.
Sentiment & Market View
Investor Fear: The Zcash flaw highlights the fragility of privacy coins — confidence can collapse overnight if hidden bugs surface.Community Respect: Hornby’s ethical disclosure (choosing not to exploit) earned trust, but also exposed how dependent these ecosystems are on individual researchers.Monero Risk Premium: Traders expect heightened volatility around Monero as audits begin; XMR may face speculative sell‑offs or cautious accumulation.Macro Context: Privacy coins already face regulatory pressure; technical flaws compound the perception of risk.
My Take
Short‑Term Bearish: ZEC’s credibility damage will linger; Monero could see speculative downside as audits raise uncertainty.Long‑Term Neutral‑Bullish: If Hornby’s audits strengthen Monero’s security, it may emerge as the most trusted privacy coin, attracting institutional interest.Lesson for Traders: Always factor protocol audits into risk management — hidden bugs can be more devastating than price volatility.
#ZEC/USDT
·
--
Pozitīvs
Skatīt tulkojumu
$BTC TRADE CAREFULLY Analyst: Bitcoin price forecasts show pressure at the $60,000 support level According to Bijie.com, according to analyst SuperBitcoinBro, after breaking below a key support level, Bitcoin (BTC) prices have already crossed the $60,000 support level, and market traders are closely watching CME futures, short positions, and possible short-term squeeze setups. Although sellers still dominate the market, analysts are watching whether extreme bearish positions will trigger a strong rebound. Bitcoin is currently close to a key technical decision point, having just closed below its 200-week simple moving average (SMA). The analysis also compares the current structure to the market bottom after the FTX collapse in 2022, suggesting that after breaking out of the long-term downtrend, BTC may retest the breakout zone. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) shows signs of bullish divergence; despite recent price declines, the RSI has formed higher lows, indicating weakening downward momentum. The current focus is on whether Bitcoin can stay above the long-term trendline and successfully defend the retest zone. {spot}(BTCUSDT) #BTC #BTC走势分析
$BTC
TRADE CAREFULLY
Analyst: Bitcoin price forecasts show pressure at the $60,000 support level

According to Bijie.com, according to analyst SuperBitcoinBro, after breaking below a key support level, Bitcoin (BTC) prices have already crossed the $60,000 support level, and market traders are closely watching CME futures, short positions, and possible short-term squeeze setups. Although sellers still dominate the market, analysts are watching whether extreme bearish positions will trigger a strong rebound. Bitcoin is currently close to a key technical decision point, having just closed below its 200-week simple moving average (SMA). The analysis also compares the current structure to the market bottom after the FTX collapse in 2022, suggesting that after breaking out of the long-term downtrend, BTC may retest the breakout zone. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) shows signs of bullish divergence; despite recent price declines, the RSI has formed higher lows, indicating weakening downward momentum. The current focus is on whether Bitcoin can stay above the long-term trendline and successfully defend the retest zone.
#BTC #BTC走势分析
·
--
Pozitīvs
Skatīt tulkojumu
$BTC $USDC $HOOD $COIN {spot}(BTCUSDT) {future}(COINUSDT) {future}(HOODUSDT) Analysis: On-chain data does not show investors selling crypto assets on a large scale to participate in SpaceX's IPO BlockBeats reported on June 6 that although some retail investors may sell Bitcoin to participate in SpaceX's record-breaking $75 billion IPO, stablecoin flows and on-chain data show that there are currently no signs of large-scale capital withdrawals from the crypto market. The valuation of this SpaceX IPO is about $1.8 trillion, with up to 30% allocation to retail investors through platforms like Robinhood, Fidelity, and Charles Schwab, far exceeding the traditional IPO's roughly 10% for individual investors. After the roadshow began, subscription demand exceeded the issuance scale. Data shows that the outflows of USDT and USDC remain within the normal range since February this year, with no abnormal redemptions or supply contractions. In contrast, on June 6, Bitcoin and Ethereum recorded net outflows of about 66,470 BTC and 2.49 million ETH respectively, indicating that more investors are moving assets into private wallets, indicating signs of buying on dips rather than concentrated cash-out. However, on-chain data cannot reflect the trading behavior of users within platforms like Robinhood and Coinbase, so whether crypto investors are selling assets to subscribe to SpaceX stock still awaits subsequent data from relevant brokers. Currently, the most obvious outflows are in spot ETFs. Data shows that as of June 3, US spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen net outflows for 13 consecutive trading days, with cumulative redemptions totaling about $4.4 billion; Spot Ethereum ETFs saw outflows for 17 consecutive trading days before recovering with slight net inflows. According to the plan, SpaceX will complete its pricing on June 11 and be listed on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol SPCX on June 12.
$BTC $USDC $HOOD $COIN

Analysis: On-chain data does not show investors selling crypto assets on a large scale to participate in SpaceX's IPO

BlockBeats reported on June 6 that although some retail investors may sell Bitcoin to participate in SpaceX's record-breaking $75 billion IPO, stablecoin flows and on-chain data show that there are currently no signs of large-scale capital withdrawals from the crypto market.

The valuation of this SpaceX IPO is about $1.8 trillion, with up to 30% allocation to retail investors through platforms like Robinhood, Fidelity, and Charles Schwab, far exceeding the traditional IPO's roughly 10% for individual investors. After the roadshow began, subscription demand exceeded the issuance scale.

Data shows that the outflows of USDT and USDC remain within the normal range since February this year, with no abnormal redemptions or supply contractions. In contrast, on June 6, Bitcoin and Ethereum recorded net outflows of about 66,470 BTC and 2.49 million ETH respectively, indicating that more investors are moving assets into private wallets, indicating signs of buying on dips rather than concentrated cash-out.

However, on-chain data cannot reflect the trading behavior of users within platforms like Robinhood and Coinbase, so whether crypto investors are selling assets to subscribe to SpaceX stock still awaits subsequent data from relevant brokers.

Currently, the most obvious outflows are in spot ETFs. Data shows that as of June 3, US spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen net outflows for 13 consecutive trading days, with cumulative redemptions totaling about $4.4 billion; Spot Ethereum ETFs saw outflows for 17 consecutive trading days before recovering with slight net inflows.

According to the plan, SpaceX will complete its pricing on June 11 and be listed on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol SPCX on June 12.
Skatīt tulkojumu
🪐 Bull market? The cracks are showing. BTC and ETH have been climbing for months, yet volume and on‑chain activity are flat, suggesting the rally is being propped up by hype rather than genuine demand. 🕸️ The network effect that usually fuels a healthy bull is missing; addressable supply remains concentrated, and the recent surge in stablecoin inflows points to a liquidity cushion that could evaporate if risk appetite flips. I lean bearish on the near term because the price action is decoupled from fundamentals, though a late‑stage breakout cannot be ruled out if macro risk recedes. 👁️‍🗨️ The market’s biggest risk is not a correction, but a prolonged stagnation that will erode confidence before any real upside can materialize. ⚠️ Personal analysis only. Not financial advice. DYOR. #NFPBlowout172K #ZECOrchardAuditToday #BTCETHExtremeOversold $BTC $ETH $OKB #BTC #Ethereum {spot}(ETHUSDT) {spot}(BTCUSDT)
🪐 Bull market? The cracks are showing. BTC and ETH have been climbing for months, yet volume and on‑chain activity are flat, suggesting the rally is being propped up by hype rather than genuine demand. 🕸️ The network effect that usually fuels a healthy bull is missing; addressable supply remains concentrated, and the recent surge in stablecoin inflows points to a liquidity cushion that could evaporate if risk appetite flips. I lean bearish on the near term because the price action is decoupled from fundamentals, though a late‑stage breakout cannot be ruled out if macro risk recedes. 👁️‍🗨️ The market’s biggest risk is not a correction, but a prolonged stagnation that will erode confidence before any real upside can materialize. ⚠️ Personal analysis only. Not financial advice. DYOR. #NFPBlowout172K #ZECOrchardAuditToday #BTCETHExtremeOversold $BTC $ETH $OKB #BTC #Ethereum
Nepārbaudīts saturs
Raksts
Skatīt tulkojumu
SOON: How FDV Could Drive MetaMask's $12 Billion Token Valuation$ETH $MASK $XRP {spot}(ETHUSDT) {future}(MASKUSDT) {spot}(XRPUSDT) MetaMask Token Launch: A Historic Airdrop SOON to Shake the Crypto World MetaMask, one of the most widely used cryptocurrency wallets, is preparing to launch its highly anticipated MASK token. With over 140 million users globally, this event is set to become one of the largest airdrops in cryptocurrency history. Early estimates suggest that MetaMask could distribute up to $2.4 billion worth of tokens, creating significant excitement in the crypto community. But what does this mean for the token's valuation, and how does the concept of Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) factor into this narrative? What is Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) and Why Does It Matter? Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) is a critical metric in the cryptocurrency space. It is calculated by multiplying the token price by the total supply of tokens. This metric provides a projection of a cryptocurrency's market cap if all tokens were in circulation. For MetaMask's MASK token, the FDV could potentially reach $12 billion, driven by the platform's robust revenue streams and massive user base. Why FDV is Crucial for Investors FDV offers a forward-looking perspective on a token's valuation, helping investors assess its potential market position. However, a high FDV can also signal risks, especially for projects with limited adoption or speculative demand. MetaMask's consistent annual revenue of approximately $120 million from trading fees, cross-chain bridge revenue, and other streams provides a strong foundation for its FDV projections. MetaMask's Revenue Model: A Key Driver of Token Valuation MetaMask's revenue model plays a significant role in its potential $12 billion FDV. The platform generates substantial income through: Trading Fees: MetaMask charges fees for swaps conducted within its wallet, contributing to its revenue.Cross-Chain Bridges: The platform earns from facilitating cross-chain transactions, a growing trend in the DeFi space.Other Revenue Streams: Additional income sources, such as partnerships and integrations, further bolster its financial health. These revenue streams not only support the MASK token's valuation but also position MetaMask as a leader in the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. FDV Dynamics: Lessons from XRP and Ethereum The cryptocurrency market has recently seen XRP surpass Ethereum in terms of FDV. XRP's FDV has reached $240 billion, compared to Ethereum's $231 billion. This shift is attributed to XRP's higher token supply and growing institutional support, including Ripple's acquisitions and ETF launches. However, XRP's market cap remains lower than Ethereum's, highlighting the nuanced relationship between FDV and market cap. Implications for MetaMask The comparison between XRP and Ethereum underscores the importance of adoption and market sentiment in driving FDV. For MetaMask, its large user base and consistent revenue streams could help it achieve a competitive FDV, but sustained adoption and ecosystem growth will be crucial. Pre-Market Trading and Speculative FDV: Insights from Monad and Plasma Pre-market trading environments often exhibit high volatility and speculative pricing. For instance, Monad (MON) and Plasma (XPL) have demonstrated implied FDVs of $14–$15 billion and $10.5 billion, respectively. These valuations highlight the speculative nature of early-stage token investments, where limited adoption and liquidity can pose significant risks. Risks and Opportunities in Early-Stage Investments Investing in tokens during their pre-market phase can offer high rewards but also comes with substantial risks, including: Volatility: Prices can fluctuate dramatically due to low liquidity.Speculative Demand: High FDVs may not be sustainable without real-world adoption.Delayed Token Unlocks: Vesting schedules can impact the circulating supply, influencing market dynamics. Tokenomics: The Foundation of FDV and Market Cap Tokenomics, including factors like vesting schedules and circulating supply, play a pivotal role in determining FDV and market cap. For example: Vesting Schedules: Delayed token unlocks can limit the tradable supply, affecting liquidity and price stability.Circulating Supply: A higher circulating supply can dilute the token's value, impacting its FDV. Projects with well-structured tokenomics are more likely to sustain their valuations and attract long-term investors Adoption Metrics: The Key to Long-Term Value While FDV provides a snapshot of a token's potential valuation, long-term value is driven by adoption metrics and ecosystem growth. For MetaMask, its large user base and integration with DeFi protocols position it for sustained success. However, delivering on promised use cases and maintaining user engagement will be critical. Conclusion: What Lies Ahead for MetaMask and FDV Trends The imminent launch of MetaMask's MASK token represents a significant milestone in the cryptocurrency space. With a potential FDV of $12 billion, the token is set to make waves in the market. However, as with any investment, understanding the risks and opportunities associated with FDV is crucial. By focusing on adoption, ecosystem growth, and sustainable revenue models, MetaMask has the potential to solidify its position as a leader in the DeFi landscape. Disclaimer This content is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to provide (i) investment advice or an investment recommendation; (ii) an offer or solicitation to buy, sell, or hold crypto/digital assets, or (iii) financial, accounting, legal, or tax advice. Crypto/digital asset holdings, including stablecoins, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding crypto/digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. Please consult your legal/tax/investment professional for questions about your specific circumstances. Information (including market data and statistical information, if any) appearing in this post is for general information purposes only.

SOON: How FDV Could Drive MetaMask's $12 Billion Token Valuation

$ETH $MASK $XRP
MetaMask Token Launch: A Historic Airdrop SOON to Shake the Crypto World
MetaMask, one of the most widely used cryptocurrency wallets, is preparing to launch its highly anticipated MASK token. With over 140 million users globally, this event is set to become one of the largest airdrops in cryptocurrency history. Early estimates suggest that MetaMask could distribute up to $2.4 billion worth of tokens, creating significant excitement in the crypto community. But what does this mean for the token's valuation, and how does the concept of Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) factor into this narrative?
What is Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) and Why Does It Matter?
Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) is a critical metric in the cryptocurrency space. It is calculated by multiplying the token price by the total supply of tokens. This metric provides a projection of a cryptocurrency's market cap if all tokens were in circulation. For MetaMask's MASK token, the FDV could potentially reach $12 billion, driven by the platform's robust revenue streams and massive user base.
Why FDV is Crucial for Investors
FDV offers a forward-looking perspective on a token's valuation, helping investors assess its potential market position. However, a high FDV can also signal risks, especially for projects with limited adoption or speculative demand. MetaMask's consistent annual revenue of approximately $120 million from trading fees, cross-chain bridge revenue, and other streams provides a strong foundation for its FDV projections.
MetaMask's Revenue Model: A Key Driver of Token Valuation
MetaMask's revenue model plays a significant role in its potential $12 billion FDV. The platform generates substantial income through:
Trading Fees: MetaMask charges fees for swaps conducted within its wallet, contributing to its revenue.Cross-Chain Bridges: The platform earns from facilitating cross-chain transactions, a growing trend in the DeFi space.Other Revenue Streams: Additional income sources, such as partnerships and integrations, further bolster its financial health.
These revenue streams not only support the MASK token's valuation but also position MetaMask as a leader in the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem.
FDV Dynamics: Lessons from XRP and Ethereum
The cryptocurrency market has recently seen XRP surpass Ethereum in terms of FDV. XRP's FDV has reached $240 billion, compared to Ethereum's $231 billion. This shift is attributed to XRP's higher token supply and growing institutional support, including Ripple's acquisitions and ETF launches. However, XRP's market cap remains lower than Ethereum's, highlighting the nuanced relationship between FDV and market cap.
Implications for MetaMask
The comparison between XRP and Ethereum underscores the importance of adoption and market sentiment in driving FDV. For MetaMask, its large user base and consistent revenue streams could help it achieve a competitive FDV, but sustained adoption and ecosystem growth will be crucial.
Pre-Market Trading and Speculative FDV: Insights from Monad and Plasma
Pre-market trading environments often exhibit high volatility and speculative pricing. For instance, Monad (MON) and Plasma (XPL) have demonstrated implied FDVs of $14–$15 billion and $10.5 billion, respectively. These valuations highlight the speculative nature of early-stage token investments, where limited adoption and liquidity can pose significant risks.
Risks and Opportunities in Early-Stage Investments
Investing in tokens during their pre-market phase can offer high rewards but also comes with substantial risks, including:
Volatility: Prices can fluctuate dramatically due to low liquidity.Speculative Demand: High FDVs may not be sustainable without real-world adoption.Delayed Token Unlocks: Vesting schedules can impact the circulating supply, influencing market dynamics.
Tokenomics: The Foundation of FDV and Market Cap
Tokenomics, including factors like vesting schedules and circulating supply, play a pivotal role in determining FDV and market cap. For example:
Vesting Schedules: Delayed token unlocks can limit the tradable supply, affecting liquidity and price stability.Circulating Supply: A higher circulating supply can dilute the token's value, impacting its FDV.
Projects with well-structured tokenomics are more likely to sustain their valuations and attract long-term investors
Adoption Metrics: The Key to Long-Term Value
While FDV provides a snapshot of a token's potential valuation, long-term value is driven by adoption metrics and ecosystem growth. For MetaMask, its large user base and integration with DeFi protocols position it for sustained success. However, delivering on promised use cases and maintaining user engagement will be critical.
Conclusion: What Lies Ahead for MetaMask and FDV Trends
The imminent launch of MetaMask's MASK token represents a significant milestone in the cryptocurrency space. With a potential FDV of $12 billion, the token is set to make waves in the market. However, as with any investment, understanding the risks and opportunities associated with FDV is crucial. By focusing on adoption, ecosystem growth, and sustainable revenue models, MetaMask has the potential to solidify its position as a leader in the DeFi landscape.
Disclaimer
This content is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to provide (i) investment advice or an investment recommendation; (ii) an offer or solicitation to buy, sell, or hold crypto/digital assets, or (iii) financial, accounting, legal, or tax advice. Crypto/digital asset holdings, including stablecoins, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding crypto/digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. Please consult your legal/tax/investment professional for questions about your specific circumstances. Information (including market data and statistical information, if any) appearing in this post is for general information purposes only.
Skatīt tulkojumu
JUST IN
JUST IN
Iedvesmojoši
Iedvesmojoši
Hua BNB
·
--
Pozitīvs
Puiši, ļaujiet man sniegt jums tirdzniecības padomu: kad visa tirgus ir sarkans un visi panikā — tas ir laiks pirkt. Un kad visi ir laimīgi un saka, ka tirgus augs vēl augstāk — tas ir tad, kad jums vajadzētu pārdot.🤝

$BTC $ETH $BNB
$SOL LABĀKAIS ANALĪTIKS VISU LAIKU
$SOL LABĀKAIS ANALĪTIKS VISU LAIKU
Hua BNB
·
--
Pozitīvs
Čaļi, man nav vārdu, jūs visi jau zināt ...
$SOL Breakout watch 🔥
Mērķis: 250$
Iegādājieties pašreizējā cenā 🤝
Pārdodiet mērķī 🤝 $SOL
{spot}(SOLUSDT)
Piesakies, lai skatītu vairāk satura
Pievienojies kriptovalūtu entuziastiem no visas pasaules platformā Binance Square
⚡️ Lasi jaunāko un noderīgāko informāciju par kriptovalūtām.
💬 Uzticas pasaulē lielākā kriptovalūtu birža.
👍 Atklāj vērtīgas atziņas no pārbaudītiem satura veidotājiem.
E-pasta adrese / tālruņa numurs
Vietnes plāns
Sīkdatņu preferences
Platformas noteikumi