Neel_Proshun_DXC

Gifts for everyone 🎁🎁🎁🎁

Like + Share + Comment 🎉🎉🎉🎉

$BNB $VVV $MAGMA

🚨 Hunter Biden just launched a coin named after the laptop that ended his political career.
On purpose.$COINGBase. September 9. He posted it himself, four minutes after the WSJ broke the story.

Then it got insane.

Within the hour: 14 fake $TRUMP tokens across 4 chains. $6.9million already changing hands on coins that aren't even the real one.

Coinbase's own website has a "Hunter Biden's Laptop" token listed. Not connected to any of this. Been sitting there this whole time.
The actual plan, if it's real: 20% of supply airdropped to people who lost money on Trump's own meme coin. A revenge airdrop, funded by Trump's losses, named after Biden's biggest scandal.

There is still no contract address. No deployer. Nothing official beyond one tweet.

Which means right now, every single person who bought "$LAPTOP"today already got rugged by a coin that doesn't exist yet.

$SOLV $SOL

01001001 00100000 01101111 01101110 01101100 01111001 00100000 01100010 01110101 01111001 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01100100 01101001 01110000 01110011 00100001

What are your plans ?????

15 days ago, I thought Dusk was just another privacy coin.

Wallets, mixing, hiding balances. Seen that story a hundred times since 2016. Most of them went nowhere.

But this one's different. Regulated exchanges building on it. Selective disclosure instead of pure anonymity. Settlement designed for actual finance, not just transfers.

Privacy coin was the wrong label the whole time. This is infrastructure wearing a privacy coat.

@Dusk isn't chasing what I thought it was 15 days ago.

$DUSK #dusk

What else in this space have you mislabeled without realizing it?

I used to think crypto's whole point was replacing banks, replacing TradFi, burning it down.

Nine years in, I don't think that anymore.

Crypto isn't replacing TradFi. It's becoming it. Same settlement needs, same compliance needs, same institutions just running on better rails underneath.

Basically what @Dusk is building toward. Not a rebellion. Infrastructure. $DUSK #dusk

If crypto ends up looking just like TradFi but faster and more transparent, did we actually change anything?

Didn't expect to see this coming from regulators honestly.

Dutch regulators talking openly about privacy not blocking it, discussing it. For compliant use cases specifically.

Back in 2016/17, privacy coins and regulators were basically enemies. Different planets. Now the conversation's shifting at least in some corners.

Makes sense really. Regulators don't hate privacy. They hate not being able to see what they're legally required to see. Selective disclosure solves that. @Dusk built its whole model around it.

$DUSK #dusk

If regulators start asking for privacy tech instead of banning it, what does that tell you?

ຈຸດເປົ້າໝາຍ Bull Market ຂອງທ່ານສຳລັບ alt coins ເຫຼົ່ານີ້ແມ່ນຫຍັງ❓

$LAB
$TAO
$ONDO
#ALGO
#UNI

Everyone keeps saying "RWAs are the next big thing."

I used to nod along. Then I actually thought about it.

The moment I tried to actually exit a tokenized position and realized I had no idea who was on the other side that's when I stopped nodding.
Tokenizing an asset doesn't make a market. You need settlement that's final. You need compliance built in, not bolted on. You need infra that regulators actually trust.

Slap a token on a bond nothing changes if the plumbing underneath is still broken.

@Dusk isn't chasing the hype cycle. It's building the boring stuff — settlement, compliance, finality that markets actually run on.

In your market is the asset missing or the infrastructure to settle it cleanly?

$DUSK #dusk

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Took me a while to get this straight.

Tokenizing an asset is just wrapping it. Slapping a token on something that already exists somewhere else, on paper, in a registry, wherever.

Native issuance is different. The asset IS the onchain record. Not a copy. Not a wrapper. The legal thing itself, born there.

I used to think tokenized RWAs were the endgame. Now I think most of them are just digital shadows of the real asset sitting in some office.

@Dusk is building for the second kind.
$DUSK #dusk

So which one are you actually holding when you buy a "tokenized" asset?

Something clicked for me about Dusk's consensus recently.

No mining. No massive computation burning through power. Just random provisioners picked from committees, doing the validating.

I remember watching PoW rigs run 24/7 back in 2017, electricity bills stacking up like nothing mattered. Dusk skips that. Committee-based PoS, random selection, deterministic finality no guessing, no waiting to see if your block sticks.

Quiet tech. Not flashy. Just works.

@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

If finality doesn't need brute force anymore, why do we still measure blockchains by how much power they burn?

Back in 2017 I thought privacy coins were all about one thing hide everything, trust no one.

Took me years and way too many "wait why is my balance public again" moments to realize that's not actually what most people need.

Dusk flipped it for me. It's not about hiding. It's about choosing who gets to see what. A regulator sees compliance. Everyone else sees nothing. That's not secrecy, that's control.

We spent a decade building transparency into everything. Maybe the real upgrade is deciding who's even allowed to look.

@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

Mainnet gets the headlines. Testnet is where the real work happens.

Boreas just went live on Dusk's testnet — Rusk v1.7.0. Quietly patching things, hardening the network, prepping DuskEVM before anyone's watching.

I've seen chains rush mainnet upgrades to chase hype. Half of them broke something nobody tested for.

Testnet is boring 😴. Testnet is where you catch the thing that would've cost you later.

Nobody claps for an upgrade nobody sees. But that's usually the one that matters most.

What would you rather have a loud launch or a quiet one that actually holds? 🔍

@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

Privacy on most chains means "hide everything" — mixers, shielded pools, total darkness. Dusk does something different.

Selective disclosure. You choose what regulators see. What auditors see. What stays yours.

I remember 2017 wallets you either broadcast your whole wallet history or you used a mixer and looked suspicious to everyone. There was no middle ground.

I chose to just hold and do nothing. Most people did.

Dusk's model says compliance and privacy aren't enemies. A regulator can verify you're clean without seeing every trade you made.

Institutions won't touch chains where everything's exposed. But will they trust a chain where nothing is, either?

@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

Been trading crypto since 2016. Seen a hundred projects slap "partnership" on a logo and call it credibility.

NPEX is different.

It's an actual AFM-regulated exchange in the Netherlands, pursuing a DLT-TSS license to issue securities natively on @Dusk . Not a wrapped token. Not a synthetic. A real regulated entity choosing this chain for real securities.

I've watched too many "institutional adoption" claims turn out to be vaporware. This one has a regulator attached.

So when a licensed exchange picks your infrastructure, is that the moment a chain stops being crypto and starts being market plumbing?

$DUSK #dusk

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Back in 2021 I bought a "tokenized" real estate share. Felt great till I asked what happens if the custodian folds. Nobody had a clean answer.

That's when it clicked — tokenization is just a wrapper. The real asset still sits with someone else, trusting a process you can't verify. I remember sitting there, rereading the terms, realizing I couldn't actually find where my ownership lived.

@Dusk skips that whole problem. The asset gets created onchain, as the actual legal record. No custodian standing between you and what you own.

Feels less like a workaround and more like the actual fix.

Would you trust an asset more if there was no custodian in the middle?

Bitcoin (BTC) Short Trade Setup

​Bitcoin is currently meeting heavy selling pressure at key resistance levels. Expecting a potential pullback down to the $62,500 – $62,000 support zone before any major bullish reversal takes place.

​Short Entry Zone: $63,100 – $63,400

​Stop Loss (SL): $63,950

​Target Levels (TP)

​TP 1: $62,800

​TP 2: $62,500

​TP 3: $62,300

​TP 4: $62,000

​📊 Setup Logic & Analysis

​Resistance Pivot: The $63,300 region is acting as the primary barrier for this move.

​Bearish Continuation: Failure to reclaim $63,500 keeps the downward pressure active, while a confirmed break below $62,500 will accelerate bearish momentum.

​Downside Liquidity: Key liquidity pools sit further down at $61,800 and $61,000.

​Invalidation: If BTC manages to reclaim $64,200, this short setup is instantly invalidated.

​⚠️ Risk Management Reminder:

Protect your capital. Avoid over-leveraging and never revenge trade. Always trade with strict risk management—the market will always present new opportunities.

#bitcoin #BTC $BTC

I care if I can prove it's clean.

A friend of mine works in KYC for a mid-size fund. He once told me, "I don't care if I see the number, I care if I can prove it's clean."

That stuck with me. Most people think compliance means showing everything. It doesn't.

@Dusk builds for exactly that gap — selective disclosure. Prove you meet the rule without dumping your whole trade history onchain for anyone to see.

That's the actual bridge between regulated finance and a public ledger, not just a buzzword.

Can you prove compliance without proving everything else too?

$DUSK #dusk

Ngemva kuka-2018 ngahlala ngohlelo lokuhambisana (compliance) lapho indoda evela ebhange yathi, "Angiyidingi i-privacy, ngidinga ukulawula." Kwangithatha iminyaka ukuqonda ukuthi wayekhuluma ngani.

Bengihlale ngicabanga ukuthi i-privacy isho ukufihla izinto. Qhabo. Kusho ukukhetha ukuthi ubani obona ini.

@Dusk iyakuthola lokhu. Imakethe ayiboni lutho. Abalawuli babona ukuhambisana. Ama-auditor abona ubufakazi lapho bedinga. Akukho ukuhambisana kokwabelana ngakho konke, kodwa futhi akusikho nobumfihlo obugcwele.

Kuzwakala njengesiqephu esilahlekile sezikhungo zangempela ku-onchain.

Ingabe i-privacy empeleni imayelana nokulawula, hhayi ukufihla?

$DUSK #dusk

🚀 $BR + $CYS + $APR — ALL THREE ARE PRINTING AMAZING PROFITS! 🤩🔥

I TOLD YOU GUYS MANY TIMES — THESE COINS WERE SHOWING STRONG POTENTIAL! 🪙📈

AND NOW THEY’RE DELIVERING THE MOVE! 💰🚀

🔥 $BR — STRONG MOMENTUM
🔥 $CYS — BIG MOVE IN ACTION
🔥 $278470— LOOKING POWERFUL

WHO FOLLOWED THE CALL AND CAUGHT THIS MOVE? 👀👇

💬 DROP YOUR ENTRY PRICE IN THE COMMENTS — LET’S SEE WHO CAUGHT IT EARLY! 🔥

DON’T CHASE THE PUMP — WATCH THE NEXT SETUPS CAREFULLY. 🎯

🚀 MORE OPPORTUNITIES CAN COME WHEN YOU’RE READY!

WHO’S READY FOR THE NEXT GEM? 👀🔥