Binance Square
MrRUHUL
13.1k ໂພສ

MrRUHUL

Square Verified+
Twitter X:( @MrRUHUL77 ) News, Memes, Charts, Hopium, Market analysis and Latest crypto updates !
ເປີດການຊື້ຂາຍ
ຜູ້ຊື້ຂາຍປະຈໍາ
4.1 ປີ
288 ກໍາລັງຕິດຕາມ
81.4K+ ຜູ້ຕິດຕາມ
66.5K+ Liked
ໂພສ
Portfolio
ປັກໝຸດ
·
--
Initializing a new mode. Less than 24 hours to go.🧧🎁💰💵🧧🎁💰💵🧧🎁💰💵🧧🎁💰💵🧧🎁💰💵
Initializing a new mode. Less than 24 hours to go.🧧🎁💰💵🧧🎁💰💵🧧🎁💰💵🧧🎁💰💵🧧🎁💰💵
ປັກໝຸດ
ບົດຄວາມ
As a Binance square Creator What we want... What our Expectations From BinanceGuys today I'm going to say something important to the binance team after hearing lot's of creator opinion... So Dear Binance we as a consistent creator we spend and we give 24/7 hours time to the Binance Day after day months after month year after years with a expectation that We as a creator We can Earn lots of money Form square as a creator we expect that Binance give us some permanent earning solution but our hope and expectations completely going to breaking. We know that there is a creator pad there is a alpha section write to earn but those are not a permanent solution and we also know what's going on behind the creator paid or alpha section and write to earn etc. We also see binance always give more priority to the new user and ignore old creator that's why lots of old creator day by day inactive.... But binance forgot that community makes community. So our Request to the Binance team that Give us a permanent Earning Like Monitization or something like that and the Creator feel more energetic and we will create more Quality Contant.. As a world Largest Exchange Its very easy to solve this issue and one more thing that is if creator getting earning then Binance with the creator will make history... @Binance_Margin @binance_south_africa @Binance_Square_Official @CZ @ETHcryptohub @Aslam72karbalayi @undefined @jenni_aura @Flicky123Nohawn @happynaccy @crypto-first21 @itachi_uhciha @Nadeem_Bisharat

As a Binance square Creator What we want... What our Expectations From Binance

Guys today I'm going to say something important to the binance team after hearing lot's of creator opinion... So
Dear Binance we as a consistent creator we spend and we give 24/7 hours time to the Binance Day after day months after month year after years with a expectation that We as a creator We can Earn lots of money Form square as a creator we expect that Binance give us some permanent earning solution but our hope and expectations completely going to breaking.
We know that there is a creator pad there is a alpha section write to earn but those are not a permanent solution and we also know what's going on behind the creator paid or alpha section and write to earn etc.
We also see binance always give more priority to the new user and ignore old creator that's why lots of old creator day by day inactive.... But binance forgot that community makes community.
So our Request to the Binance team that Give us a permanent Earning Like Monitization or something like that and the Creator feel more energetic and we will create more Quality Contant..
As a world Largest Exchange Its very easy to solve this issue and one more thing that is if creator getting earning then Binance with the creator will make history...
@Binance Margin @Binance South Africa Official
@Binance Square Official @CZ @ETHcryptohub @AloNe72 @undefined @Jia Lilly @Dr Nohawn @Naccy小妹 @Crypto-First21 @Triple_S @Nadyisom
$USELESS Short bias Price is extended above the upper Bollinger Band with RSI(6) at 89. Strong momentum, but very overbought on the short-term. Setup: Entry: 0.0486 – 0.0495 SL: 0.0520 TP1: 0.0460 TP2: 0.0435
$USELESS Short bias
Price is extended above the upper Bollinger Band with RSI(6) at 89. Strong momentum, but very overbought on the short-term.
Setup:
Entry: 0.0486 – 0.0495
SL: 0.0520
TP1: 0.0460
TP2: 0.0435
$HYPE Long short term This HYPE has pumped hard above the upper Bollinger Band after the news. Extremely extended — only look for entries on deep dips. Entry: 64.00 – 67.00 SL: 60.00 TP1: 75.00 TP2: 82.00
$HYPE Long short term
This HYPE has pumped hard above the upper Bollinger Band after the news. Extremely extended — only look for entries on deep dips.
Entry: 64.00 – 67.00
SL: 60.00
TP1: 75.00
TP2: 82.00
$BOME Short Entry: 0.000885 – 0.000910 SL: 0.000960 TP1: 0.000830 TP2: 0.000780 Reason: RSI(6) now at 95 with price still heavily extended above the upper Bollinger Band. Extremely overbought — high probability of short-term mean-reversion.
$BOME Short
Entry: 0.000885 – 0.000910
SL: 0.000960
TP1: 0.000830
TP2: 0.000780

Reason: RSI(6) now at 95 with price still heavily extended above the upper Bollinger Band. Extremely overbought — high probability of short-term mean-reversion.
🎙️ Is $BTW Solving the Biggest Problems in Finance? Yes.. | Target $0.40
avatar
ສິ້ນສຸດ
02 ຊົ່ວໂມງ 43 ນາທີ 20 ວິນາທີ
1.1k
1
1
🎙️ ⚡ Live Now: $DUSK Trading Hub + Dusk Updates
cover
ສິ້ນສຸດ
02 ຊົ່ວໂມງ 39 ນາທີ 47 ວິນາທີ
1.4k
8
5
$MUBARAK Short Entry: 0.02160 – 0.02220 SL: 0.02380 TP1: 0.01980 TP2: 0.01850 Reason: Parabolic move has price extended far above upper Bollinger Band with RSI(6) at 96. Looking for short-term mean-reversion toward EMA7.
$MUBARAK Short
Entry: 0.02160 – 0.02220
SL: 0.02380
TP1: 0.01980
TP2: 0.01850

Reason: Parabolic move has price extended far above upper Bollinger Band with RSI(6) at 96. Looking for short-term mean-reversion toward EMA7.
$DOS Short Entry: 0.2620 – 0.2660 SL: 0.2750 TP1: 0.2480 TP2: 0.2400 Reason: Strong bounce has pushed RSI(6) to 75 near upper Bollinger Band. Looking for short-term rejection and pullback toward EMA7.
$DOS Short
Entry: 0.2620 – 0.2660
SL: 0.2750
TP1: 0.2480
TP2: 0.2400

Reason: Strong bounce has pushed RSI(6) to 75 near upper Bollinger Band. Looking for short-term rejection and pullback toward EMA7.
#termmax @termmax I’ve been digging into TermMax lately, and the multi-chain push plus the RWA side feels like the most interesting part of what they’re building right now. They’re live across 8 10+ EVM chains Ethereum, BNB, Arbitrum, Base, Berachain, X Layer, and a few others. That’s not just “we deployed the contracts everywhere.” They’re actively putting markets on these chains and trying to make fixed-rate borrowing feel native in each ecosystem. On BNB especially, the Ondo tokenized stock stuff stands out. You can actually post Ondo stock tokens as collateral and borrow USDT at a fixed rate and fixed term. No more guessing what the rate will be next week. For people holding tokenized equities who don’t want to sell, that unlock is pretty clean. What I keep coming back to, though, are the practical questions: How deep is the liquidity on each chain? Ethereum and maybe BNB probably have the bulk of it, but once you go to Berachain or X Layer, does the order book (or the AMM range orders) actually clear size without big slippage? How much real overlap exists between users across these chains? Are the same wallets hopping around, or is each chain attracting its own crowd? And the bigger one: is there genuine, sticky demand for RWA-backed fixed credit, or is this still mostly early experimentation and points farming? I like that TermMax is treating fixed rate as infrastructure rather than just another yield farm. The three-token setup (FT/XT/GT) and the curator vaults give it a different shape from the usual variable-rate money markets. Pairing that with actual tokenized stocks as collateral feels like one of the cleaner bridges between TradFi style credit and on-chain capital efficiency that I’ve seen so far. Still early days on the liquidity and usage data across the newer chains, but the direction is clear. Fixed-rate + multi chain + RWA collateral is a combo worth watching. Guys this is not a financial advise.
#termmax @TermMax I’ve been digging into TermMax lately, and the multi-chain push plus the RWA side feels like the most interesting part of what they’re building right now.
They’re live across 8 10+ EVM chains Ethereum, BNB, Arbitrum, Base, Berachain, X Layer, and a few others. That’s not just “we deployed the contracts everywhere.” They’re actively putting markets on these chains and trying to make fixed-rate borrowing feel native in each ecosystem. On BNB especially, the Ondo tokenized stock stuff stands out. You can actually post Ondo stock tokens as collateral and borrow USDT at a fixed rate and fixed term. No more guessing what the rate will be next week. For people holding tokenized equities who don’t want to sell, that unlock is pretty clean.
What I keep coming back to, though, are the practical questions:
How deep is the liquidity on each chain? Ethereum and maybe BNB probably have the bulk of it, but once you go to Berachain or X Layer, does the order book (or the AMM range orders) actually clear size without big slippage?
How much real overlap exists between users across these chains? Are the same wallets hopping around, or is each chain attracting its own crowd?
And the bigger one: is there genuine, sticky demand for RWA-backed fixed credit, or is this still mostly early experimentation and points farming?
I like that TermMax is treating fixed rate as infrastructure rather than just another yield farm. The three-token setup (FT/XT/GT) and the curator vaults give it a different shape from the usual variable-rate money markets. Pairing that with actual tokenized stocks as collateral feels like one of the cleaner bridges between TradFi style credit and on-chain capital efficiency that I’ve seen so far.
Still early days on the liquidity and usage data across the newer chains, but the direction is clear. Fixed-rate + multi chain + RWA collateral is a combo worth watching.
Guys this is not a financial advise.
$PENGU Short Entry: 0.00618 – 0.00628 SL: 0.00648 TP1: 0.00600 TP2: 0.00590 Reason: Price pushed above upper Bollinger Band with RSI(6) at 72. Looking for short-term rejection and pullback toward middle band.
$PENGU Short
Entry: 0.00618 – 0.00628
SL: 0.00648
TP1: 0.00600
TP2: 0.00590
Reason: Price pushed above upper Bollinger Band with RSI(6) at 72. Looking for short-term rejection and pullback toward middle band.
$LA Short Entry: 0.0560 – 0.0575 SL: 0.0605 TP1: 0.0535 TP2: 0.0515 Reason: Sharp rally into upper Bollinger Band followed by rejection. Looking for pullback toward EMA25 / middle band.
$LA Short
Entry: 0.0560 – 0.0575
SL: 0.0605
TP1: 0.0535
TP2: 0.0515

Reason: Sharp rally into upper Bollinger Band followed by rejection. Looking for pullback toward EMA25 / middle band.
$ESPORTS Short Entry: 0.01640 – 0.01670 SL: 0.01740 TP1: 0.01560 TP2: 0.01500 Reason: Price testing upper Bollinger Band with RSI near 70 while still below EMA99. Looking for rejection and pullback toward middle band.
$ESPORTS Short

Entry: 0.01640 – 0.01670
SL: 0.01740
TP1: 0.01560
TP2: 0.01500

Reason: Price testing upper Bollinger Band with RSI near 70 while still below EMA99. Looking for rejection and pullback toward middle band.
$GPS Short Entry: 0.01820 – 0.01880 SL: 0.02050 TP1: 0.01680 TP2: 0.01550 Reason: Strong parabolic move has price extended near upper Bollinger Band with RSI(6) at 75. Looking for short-term mean-reversion toward EMA7.
$GPS Short
Entry: 0.01820 – 0.01880
SL: 0.02050
TP1: 0.01680
TP2: 0.01550

Reason: Strong parabolic move has price extended near upper Bollinger Band with RSI(6) at 75. Looking for short-term mean-reversion toward EMA7.
Happy National Couple's Day..
Happy National Couple's Day..
🎙️ $Dusk Selective Disclosure in Practice
avatar
ສິ້ນສຸດ
02 ຊົ່ວໂມງ 43 ນາທີ 09 ວິນາທີ
2.7k
7
5
$CLO Short Entry: 0.1390 – 0.1420 SL: 0.1480 TP1: 0.1320 TP2: 0.1250 Reason: Sharp vertical rally has pushed price above upper Bollinger Band with RSI elevated. Looking for short-term mean-reversion toward EMA7.
$CLO Short
Entry: 0.1390 – 0.1420
SL: 0.1480
TP1: 0.1320
TP2: 0.1250

Reason: Sharp vertical rally has pushed price above upper Bollinger Band with RSI elevated. Looking for short-term mean-reversion toward EMA7.
$POL Short Entry: 0.0820 – 0.0830 SL: 0.0855 TP1: 0.0790 TP2: 0.0768 Reason: Price remains extended above upper Bollinger Band with RSI(6) at 88. Looking for short-term mean-reversion toward EMA7 / middle band.
$POL Short
Entry: 0.0820 – 0.0830
SL: 0.0855
TP1: 0.0790
TP2: 0.0768

Reason: Price remains extended above upper Bollinger Band with RSI(6) at 88. Looking for short-term mean-reversion toward EMA7 / middle band.
What’s the real cost of that “liquidation free” leverage on TermMax Alpha? I keep seeing people treat the upfront premium like it’s the only price you pay. It’s not. According to their own docs, the actual stack looks like this: The premium itself (what they call Max Cost) Financing cost on the full notional interest paid daily to the Dual Investment vaults Take profit fee that starts at 1.9% of notional and decays as you get closer to expiry Normal slippage and any residual spread That financing piece is the one I think most people miss. It’s calculated on notional, not just the premium you put up, so every day you hold costs you even if the price is just sitting there. Compare that to regular perps. You’re dealing with funding every 8 hours that can spike or quietly bleed you, but you get continuous exposure and no hard expiry date. From what I’ve looked at, TermMax Alpha wins when I have a clear short-term directional view, the expected move more than covers the total cost, and I just want to sleep without watching liquidation prices. It loses when funding is relatively calm, the premium is rich relative to the move, or I want the flexibility to hold and adjust through multiple regimes. I treat that premium the same way I treat an options debit now. If the thesis doesn’t clear it with some room to spare, I just pass. Would you pay the premium for no liquidation, or stick with perps? @termmax #TermMax
What’s the real cost of that “liquidation free” leverage on TermMax Alpha?
I keep seeing people treat the upfront premium like it’s the only price you pay. It’s not. According to their own docs, the actual stack looks like this:
The premium itself (what they call Max Cost)
Financing cost on the full notional interest paid daily to the Dual Investment vaults
Take profit fee that starts at 1.9% of notional and decays as you get closer to expiry
Normal slippage and any residual spread
That financing piece is the one I think most people miss. It’s calculated on notional, not just the premium you put up, so every day you hold costs you even if the price is just sitting there.
Compare that to regular perps. You’re dealing with funding every 8 hours that can spike or quietly bleed you, but you get continuous exposure and no hard expiry date.
From what I’ve looked at, TermMax Alpha wins when I have a clear short-term directional view, the expected move more than covers the total cost, and I just want to sleep without watching liquidation prices. It loses when funding is relatively calm, the premium is rich relative to the move, or I want the flexibility to hold and adjust through multiple regimes.
I treat that premium the same way I treat an options debit now. If the thesis doesn’t clear it with some room to spare, I just pass.
Would you pay the premium for no liquidation, or stick with perps? @TermMax

#TermMax
ເຂົ້າສູ່ລະບົບເພື່ອສຳຫຼວດເນື້ອຫາເພີ່ມເຕີມ
ເຂົ້າຮ່ວມກຸ່ມຜູ້ໃຊ້ຄຣິບໂຕທົ່ວໂລກໃນ Binance Square.
⚡️ ໄດ້ຮັບຂໍ້ມູນຫຼ້າສຸດ ແລະ ທີ່ມີປະໂຫຍດກ່ຽວກັບຄຣິບໂຕ.
💬 ໄດ້ຮັບຄວາມໄວ້ວາງໃຈຈາກຕະຫຼາດແລກປ່ຽນຄຣິບໂຕທີ່ໃຫຍ່ທີ່ສຸດໃນໂລກ.
👍 ຄົ້ນຫາຂໍ້ມູນເຊີງເລິກທີ່ແທ້ຈາກນັກສ້າງທີ່ໄດ້ຮັບການຢືນຢັນ.
ອີເມວ / ເບີໂທລະສັບ
ແຜນຜັງເວັບໄຊ
ການຕັ້ງຄ່າຄຸກກີ້
T&Cs ແພລັດຟອມ