🔐 END-OF-DAY MARKET REPORT — September 10, 2026 🌐 TOP HEADLINES OF THE DAY The August PPI report was released today — it came in line with expectations with a monthly increase of 0.4%, but rose to 5.4% year-over-year, signaling that wholesale inflation has moved back above 5%; sharp increases in energy and diesel prices were the main drivers — the reading is being interpreted as a hawkish leading signal ahead of tomorrow’s CPI A new dispute has emerged over the CLARITY Act — according to Politico, Democrats are insisting on adding a provision introducing new regulatory standards to prevent conflicts of interest for vertically integrated crypto companies, while Republicans are resisting; with five days remaining until the critical September 15 cloture vote, the list of disagreements continues to grow Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said in an interview with CNBC that U.S. crypto markets are moving toward greater regulatory clarity regardless of the CLARITY Act’s fate in the Senate — “If it passes, great, we’ll have a law; if it doesn’t, the SEC and CFTC are already moving forward with their own rulemaking processes,” he said U.S.-Iran tensions and rising Brent crude oil prices (near the $100 threshold) continue to fuel inflation concerns and suppress risk appetite; today’s hot PPI reading further reinforced this picture Zcash (ZEC) entered consolidation this morning after reaching a $1,290 peak yesterday, and remains at its strongest levels since November 2016 — institutional interest in privacy-focused crypto assets continues ━━━ ₿ BITCOIN BTC opened at $78,292 this morning, down 0.2% from yesterday’s opening; during the morning hours, it declined into the $77,941-$77,971 range. On the daily chart, price is still holding above EMA20 ($77,130), EMA50 ($72,759), and EMA200 ($72,302), maintaining its bullish structure, but the daily MACD has turned bearish with a -585.5 histogram, signaling a loss of momentum. On the hourly chart, price is below its EMA20/50/200 cluster and has also slipped below the lower Bollinger Band, showing a short-term oversold outlook. Today’s hot PPI reading increased concerns that tomorrow’s CPI could also come in similarly strong. The $77,000-$77,600 range is being monitored as near-term support, while the $80,000-$82,000 range represents the main resistance zone; ahead of CPI, consolidation within a narrow $77,000-$82,000 range is considered the base-case scenario, while a close below $77,000 could increase selling pressure. ━━━ 🔷 ETHEREUM & ALTCOINS The overall crypto market declined 4.27% over the past 24 hours, while BTC dominance rose to 58.57% — signaling a rotation of capital from altcoins into the large-cap asset (BTC). ETH and other major altcoins were hit harder than BTC by this pullback. Zcash is taking a breather today following yesterday’s sharp rally, while profit-taking is being seen across privacy tokens. ━━━ 📋 KEY CRYPTOCURRENCY NEWS Today’s hot PPI reading, driven by energy prices, pushed expectations for tomorrow’s CPI higher as well — the market now expects a monthly reading of 0.4%, with core CPI around 2.4% year-over-year; a hotter-than-expected result could strengthen rate-hike pricing ahead of the September 15-16 FOMC decision According to analysis of the CLARITY Act, the legislation determines whether a digital asset is classified as a “security” or a “digital commodity” based on a 20% insider-control threshold — Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, XRP, and 12 major tokens could officially fall into the “digital commodity” category under this framework and come under CFTC oversight Industry analysts envision two scenarios for September 15: the vote falling just short of the 60-vote threshold, or sufficient Democratic support creating a “jailbreak” effect that could bring undecided senators on board; the ethics provisions, which are linked to Trump’s crypto interests, are still viewed as the biggest risk factor ━━━ 🔓 TOKEN UNLOCKS Aptos (APT) September 11, 2026 Amount: ~$7.09 million (0.65% of circulating supply) — 11.31 million tokens Recipient profile: Core contributors 3.96M + Community 3.21M + Investors 2.81M + Foundation 1.33M Selling pressure: 🟡 Cheelee (CHEEL) September 13, 2026 Amount: ~$2.24 million (0.79% of circulating supply) — 6.42 million tokens Selling pressure: 🟢 ━━━ 🔭 OUTLOOK AND UPCOMING EVENTS The week’s most critical agenda item is tomorrow’s (September 11) August CPI report — following today’s hot PPI reading and last week’s strong NFP, the market is now pricing in a rate hike; a hot CPI would reinforce this scenario and could create additional pressure on BTC ahead of the September 15-16 FOMC decision, while a cooler reading could provide short-term relief. The September 15 CLARITY Act cloture vote has also become even more uncertain as the Democratic-Republican dispute deepens — failure is viewed as highly likely, although the SEC/CFTC’s own regulatory processes will continue independently. BTC is expected to consolidate within the $77,000-$82,000 range ahead of CPI; a close below $77,000 could increase selling pressure. The September 11 APT unlock stands out as a relatively small-scale test point ahead of the major macro agenda.
Ethereum Classic (ETC): From Ethereum’s Fork to a Loss of More Than 90% in Value
Ethereum Classic (ETC) emerged following one of the most controversial splits in cryptocurrency history and remained in Ethereum’s shadow for years. Once at the center of major debates over the future of the Ethereum ecosystem, ETC returned to a market capitalization of billions of dollars during the 2021 bull market. However, the sharp decline that followed left a significant portion of investors facing substantial losses. Today, although Ethereum Classic remains an operating blockchain, its price is still far below its previous peak. What Is Ethereum Classic? Ethereum Classic emerged in 2016 following a major attack on the Ethereum blockchain. At the time, a decentralized investment project called The DAO, which operated on Ethereum, was attacked, and approximately 3.6 million ETH came under the attacker’s control. Following the incident, the Ethereum community made a controversial decision. The majority supported a hard fork that would alter specific transactions in the blockchain’s history in order to reverse the effects of the attack and recover the stolen funds. However, not everyone in the community accepted the decision. The group that argued blockchain transactions should remain immutable continued on the original chain. This original chain later became known as Ethereum Classic. The new chain continued under the name Ethereum, as we know it today. The “Code Is Law” Philosophy Ethereum Classic’s core identity was largely built around the “Code Is Law” philosophy. This approach argued that the outcomes of transactions on a blockchain should not be altered afterward. Therefore, from the perspective of the Ethereum Classic community, the 2016 DAO attack was not merely a hack, but also a major philosophical debate over how far the fundamental principles of blockchain technology should be taken. For this reason, ETC became more than simply an alternative blockchain that split from Ethereum; it became the product of one of the most important ideological divisions in Ethereum’s history. How Did ETC’s Price Explode? Ethereum Classic remained well behind Ethereum for years. However, during the major bull wave that swept through the crypto market in 2021, ETC also experienced an extraordinary rally. ETC, which was trading at around $5 in early 2021, surged to above $170 in May. This move represented an increase of more than 3,000% within just a few months. Ethereum Classic’s market capitalization also reached billions of dollars during this period. While some investors viewed ETC as the older and more “pure” version of Ethereum, others considered the rally largely speculative. Ethereum’s Merge Put ETC Back in the Spotlight Ethereum’s transition from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake was also a major turning point for Ethereum Classic. Following The Merge in 2022, Ethereum mining came to an end. This development raised the possibility that Ethereum’s Proof-of-Work miners could move to alternative networks. Because Ethereum Classic was one of the Proof-of-Work networks technically closest to Ethereum, expectations emerged that miners could migrate to ETC. These expectations triggered another rally in ETC’s price. However, the anticipated sustained growth did not materialize. Major Security Issues One of Ethereum Classic’s biggest problems has also been the 51% attacks it experienced in the past. In 2019, the Ethereum Classic network was hit by a major 51% attack. In 2020, the network faced multiple additional 51% attacks. A 51% attack occurs when an actor controls the majority of a blockchain network’s hashing power and can reorganize certain transactions. Such attacks can raise serious concerns about the security and decentralization of a blockchain. The attacks Ethereum Classic experienced in the past also damaged the project’s reputation. Why Has Ethereum Classic Fallen Behind Ethereum? One of Ethereum Classic’s biggest disadvantages has been the widening development gap between it and Ethereum. While Ethereum has evolved into a massive ecosystem encompassing DeFi, NFTs, stablecoins, Layer-2 networks, and smart contract ecosystems, Ethereum Classic has remained home to a much smaller ecosystem. As the number of developers and users on Ethereum grew, the gap between the two networks continued to widen. Although one of ETC’s primary use cases remains its role as a Proof-of-Work-based smart contract blockchain, this sector has become highly competitive. A Major Disappointment for Investors Ethereum Classic’s rise above $170 in 2021 created expectations among investors for significantly higher prices. However, following its peak, ETC entered a prolonged downtrend. The price fell by more than 90% from its peak. This resulted in major losses, particularly for investors who purchased ETC after following its 2021 rally. Once viewed by some as the “older version” of Ethereum that could rise again, ETC struggled in the following years to close the gap with Ethereum. Is Ethereum Classic Completely Finished? No. Ethereum Classic remains an operating blockchain network today. It continues to use a Proof-of-Work consensus mechanism and supports smart contracts. Therefore, ETC’s story is not one of a cryptocurrency that has completely disappeared. The real problem is that a project originating from the same roots as Ethereum has, over the years, fallen far behind Ethereum in terms of market capitalization, developer ecosystem, use cases, and user interest. Conclusion Ethereum Classic’s story represents one of the most interesting forks in cryptocurrency history. The ideological split triggered by a DAO attack caused Ethereum and Ethereum Classic to go their separate ways as two different blockchains. Years later, ETC experienced an extraordinary rally during the 2021 bull market, climbing above $170. However, this rally did not last. The sharp decline that followed caused investors who bought near the peak to suffer substantial losses. Although Ethereum Classic is still alive today, the story that began as Ethereum’s original chain has gradually evolved into an increasingly wide gap in competition and use cases compared with Ethereum. And the biggest question surrounding ETC’s story remains the same: Will Ethereum Classic, which emerged to preserve blockchain immutability, continue to fall behind Ethereum in the technology race?
PPI Shock Rocks Markets: Energy-Driven Inflation Sends Rate-Hike Expectations to a Peak Ahead of CPI
What Did the PPI Data Show? The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ August Producer Price Index (PPI), released today, confirmed that price pressures on the producer side have accelerated again. Final demand PPI rose 0.4% month over month, accelerating significantly from July’s 0.1% increase and recording its strongest monthly gain in three months. On an annual basis, wholesale prices rose 5.4%, slightly above the 5.3% expectation. The composition of the data was even more striking than the headline figure: Final demand goods prices rose 1.1% month over month after declining for two consecutive monthsMore than three-quarters of this increase came from energy, with energy prices rising 4.2%Diesel fuel prices jumped 24.1% in a single monthThe index excluding food, energy, and trade services rose 0.3% month over month and 4.7% year over yearProcessed intermediate goods prices rose 11.5% year over year, with two-thirds of the increase linked to diesel The only positive detail was that service prices rose just 0.1%. This indicates that the pressure has not yet broadly spread into the services sector. What Does the Data Mean: Can We Call It “Temporary”? The key question is this: how much does an energy-driven producer inflation shock alter the Fed’s reaction function? The conventional central-banking approach recommends “looking through” supply shocks. If an increase in energy prices is not demand-driven, intervening with higher interest rates can unnecessarily slow the economy. From this perspective, the 24% jump in diesel prices would not be expected to trigger a direct Fed response. However, three factors are disrupting that mechanism in this cycle: First, the source of the shock is signaling persistence. The U.S.-Iran tensions developing around the Strait of Hormuz are not a one-off event, but an ongoing structural risk. Brent crude settling above $100 indicates that the market is also pricing this premium as persistent. Second, accumulation throughout the intermediate-goods chain. The annual increase in processed intermediate goods prices to 11.5% indicates that significant cost pressure has accumulated higher up the production chain. This pressure has the potential to pass through to consumer prices with a lag — this is the risk of a second-round effect and is the primary concern for central banks. Third, inflation is already above target. The Fed is confronting this shock at a point when inflation has not yet been brought back to its 2% target. The risk of inflation expectations becoming unanchored removes much of the Fed’s ability to simply “look through” the supply shock. Bond Market: The Real Story Is Here The most critical development of recent weeks has occurred in the bond market, and this is the most important indicator for understanding the picture ahead of CPI. The U.S. 10-year Treasury yield climbed to 4.83%, reaching its highest level since November 2023. The 30-year yield is above 5.25%, near multi-decade highs. The 2-year yield is around 4.37%, its highest level since January 2025. There are three separate drivers behind this move, each pointing to a different layer of risk: Inflation premium: The oil shock is pushing long-term inflation expectations higher, increasing the compensation investors demand to hold long-duration bonds. Policy-rate expectations: The rise in short-term yields is being driven directly by rate-hike pricing. Term premium and debt concerns: This is the least discussed but perhaps most important channel. The rise in yields is occurring globally in a synchronized manner — the same selling pressure is visible in Japanese, U.K., and euro-area bonds. The U.S. Treasury’s $6 billion long-term bond buyback operation failing to satisfy the market has exposed investor concerns over public debt sustainability. The spread between the 10-year and 2-year yields is currently around 0.40 percentage points. The yield curve remains positively sloped, but if tightening expectations strengthen, the short end could rapidly converge toward the long end, raising the risk of flattening. In addition, the 10-year TIPS yield, or inflation-adjusted real yield, has risen to 2.46%, directly increasing the opportunity-cost pressure on non-yielding assets such as gold. Rate-Hike Expectations: How Did We Get Here? The chronology of the shift in expectations shows how rapidly the market has changed direction: Early August: Following weak employment data, the probability of a hike was around 35%Jackson Hole (August 28): Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s statement that “we need to be confident that core inflation is moving toward target at a sufficient pace, otherwise there is work to do” sent the probability of a hike from 35.4% to 57.5% in a single daySeptember 4: August nonfarm payrolls of 162,000, exceeding expectations, strengthened the rate-hike thesisToday: CME FedWatch is pricing a 62–65% probability of a hike, while the probability of a rate cut has effectively been reduced to zero There is a notable divergence here: most economists surveyed by Reuters expect the Fed to keep rates unchanged through the end of the year. In other words, there is a significant gap between market pricing and the economist consensus. Such divergences can amplify the magnitude of market moves following economic data releases. The Situation Ahead of Tomorrow’s CPI The August CPI report will be released Friday at 15:30 TRT, with expectations for annual inflation at 3.4% and monthly inflation at 0.4%. The PPI data provides two-way information for these expectations: The upside-risk case: The surge in energy and intermediate-goods costs has the potential to pass through to consumer prices. The probability of headline CPI exceeding expectations has increased. The reassuring factor: The fact that service prices in the PPI rose only 0.1% is a critical detail. The pressure is concentrated primarily in goods and energy rather than spreading into services. This suggests that core inflation could remain relatively moderate in the CPI data. For this reason, the key distinction to watch tomorrow is the gap between headline and core CPI: ScenarioPotential Market InterpretationHeadline high, core moderate“Temporary energy shock” — room for the Fed to look through the shock remains, with only a limited increase in rate-hike expectationsHeadline and core both highMost severe scenario — rate-hike pricing moves toward 75–80%, while the bond sell-off deepensBoth remain moderateThe least-priced-in scenario — significant upside potential as positions are unwound Outlook by Asset Class Gold: It enters the period ahead of PPI with a weakened technical picture. It has lost more than $100 over three sessions and fallen below its 55-day and 200-day moving averages — with the 200-day moving average around $4,534 now acting as resistance. Holding around the $4,400 area represents a technical rebound driven by a weaker dollar, rather than a trend reversal. The main factor weighing on gold is the rise in real yields (TIPS). However, geopolitical demand and central-bank purchases, including the PBoC’s uninterrupted buying streak extending to 22 months, remain structural supports limiting downside. Equities: Risk appetite has deteriorated significantly. The Fear & Greed Index has fallen to 42, in the Fear zone, from 52 last week (Neutral) and 59 last month (Greed). Rising yields, higher energy costs, and rate-hike risk are applying pressure to valuations through three separate channels. Crypto: Bitcoin remains trapped around the $79,000 level. It has recently shown a tendency to decouple from risk assets and move in line with gold — tomorrow’s data will test whether this behavior is structural or temporary. Rising real yields historically create an unfavorable environment for crypto assets. Oil: Brent is above $100, while WTI is around $96. Oil remains the key variable in the inflation equation and continues to respond to Middle East developments independently of the CPI report. Dollar: Although it weakened somewhat ahead of the PPI release, the dollar has the potential to strengthen again if rate-hike pricing intensifies. Conclusion The PPI data clarified the source of the inflation pressure: the problem is not demand, but energy supply. However, this does not change the fact that the Fed’s room for maneuver is constrained toward tightening — because a supply shock arriving while inflation is already above target carries the risk of unanchoring expectations. Tomorrow’s CPI will be the final major data point before the September 15–16 FOMC meeting. The market is clearly positioned toward the rate-hike side, meaning surprise risk is concentrated in a downside inflation reading. A core inflation figure below expectations could produce a move amplified by forced position unwinding. Conversely, if core inflation also surprises to the upside, a deeper bond sell-off and a second wave of pressure on risk assets could emerge. The speed at which the yield curve flattens will be the most important indicator to monitor under this scenario. $BTC $XRP
U.S. August CPI Ahead: Potential Market Scenarios for Gold, Equities, Crypto, Bonds and Oil
Importance of the Data and Market Backdrop The U.S. August CPI report, due Friday, September 11 at 15:30 TRT, is expected to come in at 3.4% year over year and 0.4% month over month. Annual inflation was also reported at 3.4% in the previous month. What makes this inflation cycle different from a standard CPI release is the way the market is positioned around the Fed. Ahead of the September 15–16 FOMC meeting, market pricing has reversed from the usual pattern: the focus is not on a rate cut, but on the possibility of a rate hike. Futures and prediction markets are pricing a 55–63% probability of a hike for the meeting, while the probability of a cut has fallen to marginal levels. The hawkish tone of the new Fed Chair is reinforcing this perception. In addition, a new escalation is unfolding in U.S.-Iran tensions, while concerns over energy supply security have triggered a sharp move higher in oil prices. This geopolitical premium represents an additional layer that is already affecting inflation expectations and risk appetite independently of the CPI report. Against this backdrop, three scenarios stand out: Scenario 1 — CPI Comes in Above Expectations (Hot Data) Mechanism: The probability of a rate hike strengthens, while the dominant interpretation becomes “a hawkish Fed on top of an oil shock.” Dollar Index: Upward pressure — driven by both hawkish rate expectations and safe-haven demandGold: A two-way reaction is possible. Higher real-yield expectations could create short-term pressure, but geopolitical demand and the need for inflation protection could limit declines. Overall picture: volatile, without a clear one-directional moveEquities: Selling pressure could dominate — rate-hike risk, higher oil costs, and concerns over profit margins could reinforce one another. Growth and technology stocks stand out as the most rate-sensitive segmentsCrypto: The initial reaction could be negative; however, Bitcoin’s recent tendency to decouple from risk assets and move more in line with gold will be one of the most important dynamics to watch in this scenarioBonds: Yields move higher, with the short end likely to react more stronglyOil: Already carrying a geopolitical premium; a hot CPI reading would not directly trigger another move higher, but concerns over weakening global demand could eventually limit prices Scenario 2 — CPI Comes in Line With Expectations Mechanism: The outcome already priced in by the market materializes, shifting the focus toward the FOMC meeting. Overall impact: The initial reaction remains limited, with the main volatility spreading across the period leading up to the FOMCGold: Sideways to slightly positive; geopolitical risk remains the dominant factorEquities: Short-term relief as uncertainty clears, but upside could remain limited by FOMC expectationsCrypto: Sideways trading, with greater sensitivity to geopolitical news flowBonds / Dollar: Minimal movement Scenario 3 — CPI Comes in Below Expectations (Cool Data) Mechanism: The least-priced-in scenario, and therefore the one with the potential for the strongest reaction. Rate-hike expectations retreat rapidly. Equities: Strong upside reaction — reduced rate-hike risk could revive risk appetite despite the oil shockGold: Falling real yields support gold, although much of the recent rally has been driven by geopolitical factors, meaning some profit-taking could emerge alongside a recovery in risk appetite — positive, but potentially less sharp than the reaction in Scenario 1Crypto: Potentially the strongest positive reaction among asset classes in this scenario; both a recovery in risk appetite and reduced rate-hike risk provide supportDollar Index: Weakens as rate-hike pricing retreatsBonds: Yields decline, particularly at the short end Overall Assessment The key difference in this cycle is that the classic “lower inflation = expect easing = risk assets rise” reaction has effectively been amplified: a softer-than-expected reading would mean both the elimination of rate-hike risk and a reduction in inflation concerns — two positive factors reinforcing each other. A hotter reading would have the opposite effect, reinforcing rate-hike expectations and weighing on risk appetite. In addition, geopolitical risk centered on oil and the Strait of Hormuz remains an independent variable. Regardless of the direction of the CPI surprise, a new geopolitical development during the day — such as an attack, mediation effort, or other escalation — could quickly invalidate the technical scenario. The week leading into the September 15–16 FOMC meeting therefore stands out as a period of elevated expected volatility, shaped by the intersection of CPI data, geopolitical developments, and comments from Fed officials. $BTC $XRP
Cyberattack Warning for Trezor Users: Fake Security Emails in Circulation
Bitcoin hardware wallet manufacturer Trezor announced that its third-party email provider had been compromised in a cyberattack and that attackers were using the infrastructure to send fake security alerts to users. The company warned users that emails particularly carrying the subject “Critical Security Alert: STM32 Entropy Vulnerability” were not created by Trezor and constituted a phishing attempt. Trezor also announced that it had disabled the domain used in the attack and was investigating how the attackers gained access to the email infrastructure. What Did the Fake Email Claim? The fraudulent message claimed that a critical hardware security vulnerability had been discovered in the STM32 microcontrollers used in Trezor devices. The email alleged that the vulnerability could weaken the level of randomness used when generating recovery phrases on certain devices and potentially put users’ assets at risk. The apparent objective was to create anxiety among users and direct them toward fraudulent links. Trezor stated that the email was not legitimate and urged users not to click on any links. The Real Risk Is Phishing, Not the Hardware The critical point here is that the incident does not mean Trezor devices themselves were directly compromised. The fact that the attack centered on the company’s third-party email infrastructure indicates that the primary threat to users is phishing and social engineering. The attackers’ objective is to create the impression that a genuine security problem exists, persuade users to take action, and ultimately obtain their recovery phrases. If a recovery phrase for a crypto wallet is compromised, attackers can control the user’s assets without physically accessing the device itself. BitBox Users Were Also Targeted There are also indications that the incident may not have been limited to Trezor. Nick Neuman, co-founder and CEO of Casa, stated that BitBox users had also received messages with similar content. Bitcoin security researcher Jameson Lopp pointed to the possibility that the email providers used by Trezor and BitBox may have been targeted by attackers. If this possibility proves correct, it could indicate that the attack was not simply a campaign against a single hardware wallet manufacturer, but rather a broader attack targeting the email and marketing infrastructure used by crypto companies. Coldcard Vulnerability Turned Into an Opportunity The timing of the attack is also noteworthy. Following the recent emergence of security vulnerabilities affecting Coldcard hardware wallets, concerns among crypto users regarding hardware wallet security had increased. Attackers appear to have exploited this environment by turning a genuine security discussion into a fraudulent warning. The basic method is quite simple: reference a real security issue, create a sense of urgency, and direct the user toward a fraudulent link. Trezor Had Previously Warned of a Data Breach This is not the only security risk Trezor has faced. In August, the company reported that a security breach at logistics service provider ShipMonk had exposed data belonging to 80,689 customers. The exposed information reportedly included names, email addresses, phone numbers, and shipping addresses. While this information alone cannot be used to take control of a wallet, it could make it easier for attackers to create more targeted and convincing phishing messages. What Could Be the Biggest Mistake Users Make? The most important security rule for hardware wallet users remains unchanged: A recovery phrase should never be provided to a website, email form, or another person under any circumstances. The fact that a message appears to come from an official company address is not sufficient on its own. Attackers can compromise third-party email systems and create highly convincing messages. Messages that ask users to re-enter or verify their recovery phrase, or to recover their wallet through a link, should be treated as serious warning signs. A New Front in Crypto Security The Trezor incident demonstrates that security risks in the crypto industry are not limited to blockchain or hardware vulnerabilities. Email services, logistics companies, and other third-party service providers are also becoming targets for attackers. As a result, focusing security efforts solely on the wallet device may no longer be sufficient. Security across the entire chain — from systems storing user data to companies’ communication infrastructure — has become critical. The Trezor incident also highlights an important reality: in attacks targeting crypto users, creating fear and a sense of urgency has become just as powerful a weapon as a technical vulnerability.
Ahead of Friday’s CPI data, the probability of a **rate hike** at the September 16 meeting is currently around 62%. Today’s PPI data at 15:30 TRT could serve as a preview of tomorrow’s CPI report, and the market could react sharply to today’s figure as well.
Markets are now pricing **three Fed rate hikes across 2026–2027**, whereas just last week the expectation was for a total of only one rate hike.
Pricing has been extremely aggressive because the environment remains highly uncertain, and this uncertainty is driving elevated volatility across markets. $BTC
Does anyone remember the Luna Coin crash between May 8–12, 2022? $65–68 → $30 → $17 → $ 1 → $0.00005 If this had been an upward move instead of a decline, the magnitude of the move would have been equivalent to a 136 million% increase. The Terra-LUNA collapse wiped out roughly $50–60 billion in market value and triggered a much broader wave of selling across the crypto market. Approximately 4 years, 3 months, and 28 days have passed since May 12, 2022. $LUNC $USTC
Ìkìlọ̀ Aabo Nínú Àwọn Pátákó Crypto: $3.63 Bilionu Ti Pá Nípa Ìkọlù Cyber
Nípa bí a ṣe ti ń gba ìlànà ayẹ̀wò aabo jakejado ní inú ilé-iṣẹ́ cryptocurrency, àwọn pátákó ṣì ń dojú kọ ewu ìkọlù cyber. Gẹ́gẹ́ bí data CoinGecko ṣe sọ, ó ju $3.63 bilionu lọ ní owó tí a pàdánù láàárín Oṣù January 2025 àti July 2026 nítorí ìkọlù lórí àwọn pátákó crypto àti ìjẹ́wọ́ ìjẹ́wọ́ (credentials) tí a ti fọ́. Ohun tí ó yà mí lẹ́nu jù nínú ìròyìn náà ni pé apá pàtàkì kan nínú àwọn pátákó tí a fọ́kọ́lu ti ti ṣáájú ti fi ara rẹ̀ ṣe ayẹ̀wò aabo ní òmìnira. Kí Nìdí Àwọn Ayẹ̀wò Aabo Fi Kúrò Díẹ̀? Gẹ́gẹ́ bí ìròyìn CoinGecko tí ó jẹ́ ọjọ́ August 27, tó fẹrẹ̀ to 88% nínú owó tí a jí àti nǹkan bí 60% nínú àwọn pátákó tí a kọlu ti ti ní ayẹ̀wò aabo ní òmìnira.
LIPOTI O MAKETI I LE FAIAGA O LE ASO — SETEMA 7, 2026
🔐 LIPOTI O MAKETI I LE FAIAGA O LE ASO — SETEMA 7, 2026 🌐 TALES TAUA O LE ASO O loo aga’i atu le maketi o le crypto i se vaitaimi taua e lua aso: i le aso 15 o Setema, o le Senate o le a faia se palota fa’atonu (cloture) e mana’omia ai le 60-palota i le CLARITY Act, sosoo ai ma le fa’ai’uga o tului a le FOMC i le aso 16 o Setema—o le talosaga a le Ta’ita’i a le Senate o Thune mo le cloture na faila i le amataga o Aukuso ua va’aia o le avanoa mulimuli lea a le Konekeresi a’o le’i o’o i palota o le vaeluagalemu O lo’o fuafuaina e Polymarket le avanoa e pasia ai le H.R. 3633 (CLARITY Act) i lona tulaga o iai nei i le 15–16%, ae o Kalshi o lo’o fuafuaina le konekarate mo le faiga lautele o maketi i le 19–20%—o lo’o umia e Republicans nofoa e 53, o lona uiga e mana’omia le lagolago a Democrats e ausia ai le sone 60-palota; o lo’o tumau pea aiaiga tau amio, taui mo stablecoin, ma tiute o DeFi o itu autu e le ioe i ai
Aghamayan sa Selyo sa Mga Bono sa Mataas na Antas sa Ilang Dekada: Nagbabago ang Pundasyon ng Pamilihan
Aghamayan sa Selyo sa Mga Bono sa Mataas na Antas sa Ilang Dekada: Nagbabago ang Pundasyon ng Pamilihan Mula sa US papuntang Japan, mula UK papuntang France, ang mga ani ng government bonds ay nasa pinakamataas na antas sa loob ng mga dekada. Hindi na lang ito tungkol sa interest rate; ibig sabihin, nagbabago ang pundasyon kung saan pinapresyo ang mga equities, ginto, at crypto assets. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Nasaan Tayo — Pagsasara ng Setyembre 4 US: Ang 10-taong Treasury yield ay sinara ang linggo sa 4.78%. Umabot ito sa 4.812% sa loob ng linggo, ang pinakamataas mula noong Nobyembre 2023; ang 52-week high ay 4.818%. Sa panandaliang panahon, ang 2-year yield ay nasa 4.37%, habang ang 20-year ay nasa 5.25%. Ang 30-year yield ay umabot malapit sa sikolohikal na 5% na hangganan. Ang 10-year yield ay tumaas ng 17 basis points sa nakalipas na buwan at 71 basis points sa nakalipas na taon.