Binance Square
Aein 1
120 ໂພສ

Aein 1

AI will change the world not humans
0 ກໍາລັງຕິດຕາມ
13 ຜູ້ຕິດຕາມ
59 Liked
ໂພສ
·
--
Brickken TVL went from $12.18M in Nov 2024 to $42.36M in Oct 2026 That’s around 248% growth. The numbers show how far the project has come. Behind the figures, @Brickken continues building the infra needed to issue, manage & oversee tokenized RWAs. Still watching $BKN closely @Brickken
Brickken TVL went from $12.18M in Nov 2024 to $42.36M in Oct 2026

That’s around 248% growth.

The numbers show how far the project has come. Behind the figures, @Brickken continues building the infra needed to issue, manage & oversee tokenized RWAs.

Still watching $BKN closely

@Brickken
·
--
@Brickken Real estate tokenization needs connected financial systems @edwin_mata explains how blockchain can connect banks, fintechs & regulators @Brickken helps businesses issue and manage tokenized RWAs including investor onboarding & compliance Next step is simpler blockchain finance $BKN
@Brickken

Real estate tokenization needs connected financial systems

@edwin_mata explains how blockchain can connect banks, fintechs & regulators

@Brickken helps businesses issue and manage tokenized RWAs including investor onboarding & compliance

Next step is simpler blockchain finance

$BKN
·
--
$BKN Tokenization can connect investors with opportunities they might never have considered. @edwin_mata explains how technology opens new paths to investment. @Brickken builds RWA tokenization infra for issuance, onboarding and compliance. Strong infra supports adoption. @Brickken
$BKN

Tokenization can connect investors with opportunities they might never have considered.

@edwin_mata explains how technology opens new paths to investment.

@Brickken builds RWA tokenization infra for issuance, onboarding and compliance.

Strong infra supports adoption.

@Brickken
·
--
Tokenization can expand a business, but it cannot replace a solid business model. That point from @edwin_mata at @CoinFerenceX deserves more attention. His example was a fund issuing a bond. These are traditional financial instruments. The opportunity lies in using technology to broaden investor access and automate parts of the process. The value goes beyond putting assets onchain. - Broader investor access, subject to eligibility requirements - Automation across the asset lifecycle - More efficient investor and asset management The underlying business and legal structure still matter. Tokenization can improve how a financial structure operates, but it cannot guarantee success. @Brickken is building the infrastructure to bring financial assets onchain. Bullish on the rails being built for the next era of tokenized finance. $BKN @Brickken
Tokenization can expand a business, but it cannot replace a solid business model.

That point from @edwin_mata at @CoinFerenceX deserves more attention.

His example was a fund issuing a bond. These are traditional financial instruments. The opportunity lies in using technology to broaden investor access and automate parts of the process.

The value goes beyond putting assets onchain.

- Broader investor access, subject to eligibility requirements
- Automation across the asset lifecycle
- More efficient investor and asset management

The underlying business and legal structure still matter. Tokenization can improve how a financial structure operates, but it cannot guarantee success.

@Brickken is building the infrastructure to bring financial assets onchain.

Bullish on the rails being built for the next era of tokenized finance.

$BKN @Brickken
·
--
We will never see $BKN at this price again. $0.1058 with a $5.59M market cap. The chart is holding around this level, but my focus goes beyond short-term price action. @Brickken is moving forward with BKN 2.0, designed to support cross-chain capital flows and the development of agentic capital markets. Meanwhile, Brickken continues building its RWA tokenization infrastructure, covering asset issuance, investor onboarding, compliance and asset management. I want to see how this infrastructure translates into real adoption and demand for $BKN . The vision is ambitious. The execution will matter. I'm bullish on Brickken's direction, and I'm watching closely. @Brickken
We will never see $BKN at this price again.

$0.1058 with a $5.59M market cap.

The chart is holding around this level, but my focus goes beyond short-term price action.

@Brickken is moving forward with BKN 2.0, designed to support cross-chain capital flows and the development of agentic capital markets.

Meanwhile, Brickken continues building its RWA tokenization infrastructure, covering asset issuance, investor onboarding, compliance and asset management.

I want to see how this infrastructure translates into real adoption and demand for $BKN .

The vision is ambitious. The execution will matter.

I'm bullish on Brickken's direction, and I'm watching closely.

@Brickken
·
--
$BKN @Brickken An AI agent can have an identity and still have too much power. The part of @Brickken’s ERC-8226 approach I find strongest is the focus on authority. ERC-8004 provides an identity registry for agents, while ERC-8226, currently a Draft, focuses on a different question: What is this agent actually authorized to do? A mandate can define: - The actions an agent can perform - Financial limits - How long the authority remains active - When the mandate can be revoked - The assets and conditions covered by that authority ERC-8226 also defines a model where the regulated asset can verify the agent’s mandate before an agent initiated action. Asset eligibility and agent authority remain separate checks. That separation matters. AI agents can handle execution, but regulated markets still need a verifiable record of who authorized the action and within what limits. @Brickken is working on that mandate layer through ERC-8226.
$BKN @Brickken

An AI agent can have an identity and still have too much power.

The part of @Brickken’s ERC-8226 approach I find strongest is the focus on authority.

ERC-8004 provides an identity registry for agents, while ERC-8226, currently a Draft, focuses on a different question:

What is this agent actually authorized to do?

A mandate can define:

- The actions an agent can perform
- Financial limits
- How long the authority remains active
- When the mandate can be revoked
- The assets and conditions covered by that authority

ERC-8226 also defines a model where the regulated asset can verify the agent’s mandate before an agent initiated action. Asset eligibility and agent authority remain separate checks.

That separation matters.

AI agents can handle execution, but regulated markets still need a verifiable record of who authorized the action and within what limits.

@Brickken is working on that mandate layer through ERC-8226.
·
--
$BKN @Brickken Brickken has already started to make waves in Singapore. 🇸🇬 The Singapore run started on October 3, with @Brickken on the ground through October 11. The schedule gets especially busy from today. @CoinFerenceX runs October 5–6 at Gardens by the Bay, with CEO @edwin_mata speaking on tokenized funds, Treasuries and private credit. Then TOKEN2049 takes over Marina Bay Sands on October 7–8, bringing 25,000+ attendees and 7,000+ companies together. On October 10, Brickken is hosting The RWA Paddock, a curated gathering around tokenised markets during the F1 Sprint Race. The lineup says a lot about where @Brickken is putting its energy: - Tokenized funds - Private credit - RWAs - Institutional markets - Tokenized private markets Big week for Brickken in Singapore.
$BKN @Brickken

Brickken has already started to make waves in Singapore. 🇸🇬

The Singapore run started on October 3, with @Brickken on the ground through October 11.

The schedule gets especially busy from today.

@CoinFerenceX runs October 5–6 at Gardens by the Bay, with CEO @edwin_mata speaking on tokenized funds, Treasuries and private credit.

Then TOKEN2049 takes over Marina Bay Sands on October 7–8, bringing 25,000+ attendees and 7,000+ companies together.

On October 10, Brickken is hosting The RWA Paddock, a curated gathering around tokenised markets during the F1 Sprint Race.

The lineup says a lot about where @Brickken is putting its energy:

- Tokenized funds
- Private credit
- RWAs
- Institutional markets
- Tokenized private markets

Big week for Brickken in Singapore.
·
--
$BKN @Brickken RWA is starting to look less like a narrative and more like an actual financial stack. Seeing @Brickken among the 18 members of the @RWAFoundation fits the direction I’ve been watching across tokenization. Think about an institution bringing a private asset onchain. Issuing the token is only the first step. The asset still needs compliance, investor onboarding, lifecycle management, reliable data, market infrastructure and a way to work with other systems. That’s where I see Brickken’s role becoming more important. @Brickken is building infrastructure for issuing and managing tokenized assets, while also working on open standards, agentic capital markets and connections with market infrastructure like @redstone_defi. 18 members, one growing RWA ecosystem. Bullish on RWA.
$BKN @Brickken

RWA is starting to look less like a narrative and more like an actual financial stack.

Seeing @Brickken among the 18 members of the @RWAFoundation fits the direction I’ve been watching across tokenization.

Think about an institution bringing a private asset onchain.

Issuing the token is only the first step.

The asset still needs compliance, investor onboarding, lifecycle management, reliable data, market infrastructure and a way to work with other systems.

That’s where I see Brickken’s role becoming more important.

@Brickken is building infrastructure for issuing and managing tokenized assets, while also working on open standards, agentic capital markets and connections with market infrastructure like @redstone_defi.

18 members, one growing RWA ecosystem.

Bullish on RWA.
·
--
$BKN This is your all-in-one digital asset and RWA tokenization infrastructure. Tokenizing an asset sounds simple until you get to everything that comes after. You need to issue the asset, onboard investors, verify who can participate, manage ownership, handle distributions and keep reporting organized. @Brickken brings those processes together in one platform. A business can tokenize assets such as real estate, funds, bonds or commodities, launch an Investor Portal, manage KYC/KYB and keep track of investors and ownership from one dashboard. The platform also automates corporate actions, distributions and reporting across the asset lifecycle. @Brickken is building the kind of infrastructure the RWA market needs. @Brickken
$BKN

This is your all-in-one digital asset and RWA tokenization infrastructure.

Tokenizing an asset sounds simple until you get to everything that comes after.

You need to issue the asset, onboard investors, verify who can participate, manage ownership, handle distributions and keep reporting organized.

@Brickken brings those processes together in one platform.

A business can tokenize assets such as real estate, funds, bonds or commodities, launch an Investor Portal, manage KYC/KYB and keep track of investors and ownership from one dashboard.

The platform also automates corporate actions, distributions and reporting across the asset lifecycle.

@Brickken is building the kind of infrastructure the RWA market needs.

@Brickken
·
--
$BKN @Brickken Tokenization is moving into a much bigger phase. Two recent @Brickken moves connect different parts of the same problem. First, the partnership with @redstone_defi brings eligible tokenized assets closer to the infrastructure they need after issuance, including market data, Credora risk ratings, and T+0 settlement for supported liquidations. Then Brickken joined @LFDecentralized to work on open standards for tokenized assets and agentic capital markets, covering areas like asset interfaces, verifiable claims, and delegated authority. The bigger picture starts to become clearer. - Assets need reliable market data - Markets need risk information - Systems need interoperability - Agents need clear and verifiable authority Tokenization is only one layer. The harder part is building the infrastructure that lets tokenized assets actually move, interact, and operate across a broader financial system. That’s the direction I’m seeing from @Brickken. It’s less about issuing assets alone and more about the infrastructure around them.
$BKN @Brickken

Tokenization is moving into a much bigger phase.

Two recent @Brickken moves connect different parts of the same problem.

First, the partnership with @redstone_defi brings eligible tokenized assets closer to the infrastructure they need after issuance, including market data, Credora risk ratings, and T+0 settlement for supported liquidations.

Then Brickken joined @LFDecentralized to work on open standards for tokenized assets and agentic capital markets, covering areas like asset interfaces, verifiable claims, and delegated authority.

The bigger picture starts to become clearer.

- Assets need reliable market data
- Markets need risk information
- Systems need interoperability
- Agents need clear and verifiable authority

Tokenization is only one layer.

The harder part is building the infrastructure that lets tokenized assets actually move, interact, and operate across a broader financial system.

That’s the direction I’m seeing from @Brickken. It’s less about issuing assets alone and more about the infrastructure around them.
·
--
‎The best tokenization is built for more than the launch. ‎ ‎Putting an asset onchain is only the beginning. ‎ ‎The real value comes from everything around it: ‎➙ Compliance ‎➙ Investor onboarding ‎➙ Asset management ‎➙ Distribution ‎➙ Lifecycle ‎ ‎That’s the space @Brickken has been building in. ‎ ‎Now @Brickken is shortlisted for Best Tokenized Real World Asset Platform at the @CoinGapeMedia Global Onchain Awards. ‎ ‎Voting is open until September 27. ‎ ‎Already done voting @Brickken $BKN
‎The best tokenization is built for more than the launch.
‎
‎Putting an asset onchain is only the beginning.
‎
‎The real value comes from everything around it:
‎➙ Compliance
‎➙ Investor onboarding
‎➙ Asset management
‎➙ Distribution
‎➙ Lifecycle
‎
‎That’s the space @Brickken has been building in.
‎
‎Now @Brickken is shortlisted for Best Tokenized Real World Asset Platform at the @CoinGapeMedia Global Onchain Awards.
‎
‎Voting is open until September 27.
‎
‎Already done voting @Brickken

$BKN
·
--
$BKN surpassed 28M staked. That’s 18.7% of the total supply now locked. Its move from $25M to $28M happened through the BKN 2.0 migration, showing the level of participation from holders as the new token infrastructure came online. I like seeing holders choose to stay involved and put their $BKN to work. Meanwhile, @Brickken keeps building the infrastructure around it, from compliant asset issuance and investor onboarding to lifecycle management. RWA szn.
$BKN surpassed 28M staked.

That’s 18.7% of the total supply now locked.

Its move from $25M to $28M happened through the BKN 2.0 migration, showing the level of participation from holders as the new token infrastructure came online.

I like seeing holders choose to stay involved and put their $BKN to work.

Meanwhile, @Brickken keeps building the infrastructure around it, from compliant asset issuance and investor onboarding to lifecycle management.

RWA szn.
·
--
$BKN October is just approaching, but @Brickken already has a solid lineup. 📍 October 3–11 @TOKEN2049 week in Singapore, with Brickken on the ground across the city. 📍 October 5–6 @CoinferenceX at Gardens by the Bay, where Brickken CEO @edwin_mata will speak about tokenized funds, Treasuries and private credit at scale. 📍 October 10 The Paddock, Brickken’s curated networking event during F1 weekend at the Mandarin Oriental. Three different rooms. One bigger conversation around tokenized markets, RWAs and agentic capital markets. Singapore is going to be a busy one for @Brickken
$BKN

October is just approaching, but @Brickken already has a solid lineup.

📍 October 3–11
@TOKEN2049 week in Singapore, with Brickken on the ground across the city.

📍 October 5–6
@CoinferenceX at Gardens by the Bay, where Brickken CEO @edwin_mata will speak about tokenized funds, Treasuries and private credit at scale.

📍 October 10
The Paddock, Brickken’s curated networking event during F1 weekend at the Mandarin Oriental.

Three different rooms. One bigger conversation around tokenized markets, RWAs and agentic capital markets.

Singapore is going to be a busy one for @Brickken
·
--
$BKN @Brickken Tokenization is becoming harder to stop. The SEC approved a temporary, conditional exemption that allows certain venues to facilitate permissioned onchain trading of tokenized U.S. stocks. Temporary? Yes. Conditional? Absolutely. But the direction matters. Regulators are now creating a controlled framework for tokenized securities while collecting market data to help shape future rules. This is exactly the kind of development I’m watching around @Brickken. @Brickken is building infrastructure around tokenization, compliance and the management of regulated digital assets. Tokenization needs more than putting assets onchain. The rules are starting to move. @Brickken is building for what comes next.
$BKN @Brickken

Tokenization is becoming harder to stop.

The SEC approved a temporary, conditional exemption that allows certain venues to facilitate permissioned onchain trading of tokenized U.S. stocks.

Temporary? Yes.
Conditional? Absolutely.

But the direction matters.

Regulators are now creating a controlled framework for tokenized securities while collecting market data to help shape future rules.

This is exactly the kind of development I’m watching around @Brickken.

@Brickken is building infrastructure around tokenization, compliance and the management of regulated digital assets.

Tokenization needs more than putting assets onchain.

The rules are starting to move.
@Brickken is building for what comes next.
·
--
$BKN has been looking good for a week now. I’m watching the project behind it just as closely. @Brickken keeps expanding its work around tokenized assets, compliance and programmable capital markets, while also exploring how AI agents can interact with regulated onchain infrastructure. That combination is becoming more relevant as RWAs move from experiments toward real financial use cases. And starting tomorrow September 16, @Brickken starts a busy day in Barcelona with @EBlockchainCon until September 17, followed by @ETHSpain_ on the same date. $BKN is not done yet. It’s just a beginning. @Brickken
$BKN has been looking good for a week now.

I’m watching the project behind it just as closely.

@Brickken keeps expanding its work around tokenized assets, compliance and programmable capital markets, while also exploring how AI agents can interact with regulated onchain infrastructure.

That combination is becoming more relevant as RWAs move from experiments toward real financial use cases.

And starting tomorrow September 16, @Brickken starts a busy day in Barcelona with @EBlockchainCon until September 17, followed by @ETHSpain_ on the same date.

$BKN is not done yet. It’s just a beginning.

@Brickken
·
--
Barcelona is about to become a serious meeting point for tokenization. And @Brickken gets to have that conversation at home. They will be at @EBlockchainCon on September 16 – 17 and @ETHSpain_ on September 17, both close to its Barcelona office. I like the timing. The tokenization industry has already moved beyond simply putting assets onchain. The harder part is building everything around them. - Issuance - Compliance - Asset management - Distribution - Lifecycle operations @Brickken is already focused on this infrastructure layer, with 150+ clients, $660M+ in total tokenized value and operations across 40+ countries. So I’m less interested in another conversation about whether tokenization will happen. I want to hear how the people building it plan to make it actually work at scale. Barcelona could be where the next phase of tokenization starts taking shape. @Brickken $BKN
Barcelona is about to become a serious meeting point for tokenization.

And @Brickken gets to have that conversation at home.

They will be at @EBlockchainCon on September 16 – 17 and @ETHSpain_ on September 17, both close to its Barcelona office.

I like the timing.

The tokenization industry has already moved beyond simply putting assets onchain.

The harder part is building everything around them.

- Issuance
- Compliance
- Asset management
- Distribution
- Lifecycle operations

@Brickken is already focused on this infrastructure layer, with 150+ clients, $660M+ in total tokenized value and operations across 40+ countries.

So I’m less interested in another conversation about whether tokenization will happen.

I want to hear how the people building it plan to make it actually work at scale.

Barcelona could be where the next phase of tokenization starts taking shape.

@Brickken $BKN
·
--
$BKN @Brickken AI can execute the trade. It cannot carry the blame. This is one of the points from Brickken CEO @edwin_mata’s latest interview with @CryptoDotNews that deserves more attention. AI agents are already being connected to wallets, payment systems and trading infrastructure. The difficult question comes when an autonomous agent causes a loss. Who is responsible? Edwin’s position is straightforward: current law does not recognize AI as a legal person capable of holding duties or liability. Responsibility follows the authority delegated to the agent. If an investor or institution gives an agent a defined mandate, an unfavorable trade within that mandate does not automatically make the software liable. The harder case comes when the agent exceeds its authority or the systems around it fail. That is where enforceable limits become critical. Edwin points to ERC-8226, the proposed Regulated Agent Mandate Standard, which could make delegated authority verifiable onchain through limits around assets, actions, transaction values, duration and revocation. I think this is the direction agentic finance needs. Giving AI access to capital without clearly defining what it can do creates a serious accountability problem. The future of autonomous finance will depend less on removing humans and more on making delegation measurable, limited and verifiable. @Brickken is already working on infrastructure around that problem.
$BKN @Brickken

AI can execute the trade.
It cannot carry the blame.

This is one of the points from Brickken CEO @edwin_mata’s latest interview with @CryptoDotNews that deserves more attention.

AI agents are already being connected to wallets, payment systems and trading infrastructure.

The difficult question comes when an autonomous agent causes a loss.

Who is responsible?

Edwin’s position is straightforward: current law does not recognize AI as a legal person capable of holding duties or liability.

Responsibility follows the authority delegated to the agent.

If an investor or institution gives an agent a defined mandate, an unfavorable trade within that mandate does not automatically make the software liable.

The harder case comes when the agent exceeds its authority or the systems around it fail.

That is where enforceable limits become critical.

Edwin points to ERC-8226, the proposed Regulated Agent Mandate Standard, which could make delegated authority verifiable onchain through limits around assets, actions, transaction values, duration and revocation.

I think this is the direction agentic finance needs.

Giving AI access to capital without clearly defining what it can do creates a serious accountability problem.

The future of autonomous finance will depend less on removing humans and more on making delegation measurable, limited and verifiable.

@Brickken is already working on infrastructure around that problem.
·
--
‎RWA is growing too fast to ignore. ‎ ‎The market is expanding beyond the early experiments, with more real world assets moving onchain and institutional participation continuing to grow. ‎ ‎And now I am seeing $BKN move with serious strength. ‎ ‎Up more than 60% in 24h. ‎ ‎The chart matters more when you look at the market behind it. ‎ ‎As more assets move onchain, the need for infrastructure around issuance, compliance, investor onboarding and asset management grows with it. ‎ ‎That is exactly the layer @Brickken is building. ‎ ‎ $BKN is looking good right here. It's just getting started.
‎RWA is growing too fast to ignore.
‎
‎The market is expanding beyond the early experiments, with more real world assets moving onchain and institutional participation continuing to grow.
‎
‎And now I am seeing $BKN move with serious strength.
‎
‎Up more than 60% in 24h.
‎
‎The chart matters more when you look at the market behind it.
‎
‎As more assets move onchain, the need for infrastructure around issuance, compliance, investor onboarding and asset management grows with it.
‎
‎That is exactly the layer @Brickken is building.
‎
‎ $BKN is looking good right here. It's just getting started.
·
--
@Brickken $BKN MiCA solved one problem. It exposed another. Regulatory certainty matters, but certainty alone does not make a market competitive. CEO of Brickken @edwin_mata breaks this down in his latest interview with @TheFintechTimes. For smaller crypto companies, operating under MiCA can involve significant costs across licensing, governance, capital requirements, compliance personnel, cybersecurity, reporting and ongoing supervision. That changes the competitive landscape. Larger institutions and established players are generally better positioned to absorb those costs, while smaller companies have to think harder about capital efficiency, speed to market and even where they should build. One line from Edwin stood out to me: “Compliance is becoming a moat, not a foundation.” That becomes even more relevant as tokenization moves further into institutional finance. @Brickken is building around the infrastructure needed to bring issuance, compliance, investor management and asset lifecycle together. European crypto now faces a different question. Can regulatory certainty coexist with the speed and economics needed to keep innovation competitive? That is the part I will be watching.
@Brickken $BKN

MiCA solved one problem.
It exposed another.

Regulatory certainty matters, but certainty alone does not make a market competitive.

CEO of Brickken @edwin_mata breaks this down in his latest interview with @TheFintechTimes.

For smaller crypto companies, operating under MiCA can involve significant costs across licensing, governance, capital requirements, compliance personnel, cybersecurity, reporting and ongoing supervision.

That changes the competitive landscape.

Larger institutions and established players are generally better positioned to absorb those costs, while smaller companies have to think harder about capital efficiency, speed to market and even where they should build.

One line from Edwin stood out to me:

“Compliance is becoming a moat, not a foundation.”

That becomes even more relevant as tokenization moves further into institutional finance.

@Brickken is building around the infrastructure needed to bring issuance, compliance, investor management and asset lifecycle together.

European crypto now faces a different question.

Can regulatory certainty coexist with the speed and economics needed to keep innovation competitive?

That is the part I will be watching.
·
--
Tokenizing an asset does not automatically give it a path to US investors. That gap is easy to overlook. An issuer can have the technology to create and manage a tokenized financial instrument, but still need a separate regulatory structure to distribute it in the US. That is where the @Brickken x @_Issuant partnership makes sense. Brickken handles the infrastructure side: issuance, compliance execution, investor onboarding, document workflows, and lifecycle management. Issuant brings the US regulatory layer, including broker dealer and registered investment advisor capability. Two different problems, now connected through one engagement. For European issuers looking toward the US market, this can remove a major layer of coordination. Tokenization creates the asset. Distribution gets it where it needs to go. @Brickken is connecting both sides. @Brickken $BKN
Tokenizing an asset does not automatically give it a path to US investors.

That gap is easy to overlook.

An issuer can have the technology to create and manage a tokenized financial instrument, but still need a separate regulatory structure to distribute it in the US.

That is where the @Brickken x @_Issuant partnership makes sense.

Brickken handles the infrastructure side: issuance, compliance execution, investor onboarding, document workflows, and lifecycle management.

Issuant brings the US regulatory layer, including broker dealer and registered investment advisor capability.

Two different problems, now connected through one engagement.

For European issuers looking toward the US market, this can remove a major layer of coordination.

Tokenization creates the asset. Distribution gets it where it needs to go.

@Brickken is connecting both sides.

@Brickken $BKN
ເຂົ້າສູ່ລະບົບເພື່ອສຳຫຼວດເນື້ອຫາເພີ່ມເຕີມ
ເຂົ້າຮ່ວມກຸ່ມຜູ້ໃຊ້ຄຣິບໂຕທົ່ວໂລກໃນ Binance Square.
⚡️ ໄດ້ຮັບຂໍ້ມູນຫຼ້າສຸດ ແລະ ທີ່ມີປະໂຫຍດກ່ຽວກັບຄຣິບໂຕ.
💬 ໄດ້ຮັບຄວາມໄວ້ວາງໃຈຈາກຕະຫຼາດແລກປ່ຽນຄຣິບໂຕທີ່ໃຫຍ່ທີ່ສຸດໃນໂລກ.
👍 ຄົ້ນຫາຂໍ້ມູນເຊີງເລິກທີ່ແທ້ຈາກນັກສ້າງທີ່ໄດ້ຮັບການຢືນຢັນ.
ອີເມວ / ເບີໂທລະສັບ
ແຜນຜັງເວັບໄຊ
ການຕັ້ງຄ່າຄຸກກີ້
T&Cs ແພລັດຟອມ