#daolabs
daolabs
60,595 views
421 ກຳລັງສົນທະນາ
ມາແຮງ
ຫຼ້າສຸດ
·
--
ສັນຍານກະທິງ
ຢືນຢັນແລ້ວ
ເບິ່ງການແປ
@DAOLabs is upgrading Social Mining on June 29, here's my honest take
Social Mining has been one of the few post to earn systems that actually pays for real work. You create content, tweets, threads, graphics, articles for blockchain projects, submit it, get reviewed, and earn points that convert to $USDT or project tokens. Zero capital required, just consistency.
I've contributed across hubs like DAOVERSE for a while now, and the earnings are genuine when the work is genuine. That part of the system isn't broken.
What's been clunky is tracking everything, points here, tasks there, submissions scattered across hubs like you're running five jobs at once. The upcoming upgrade is built to fix exactly that, one streamlined flow for tasks, tracking, and rewards.
On validation, my honest view
→ Quality content gets paid, no shortcuts needed
→ Lazy copy paste content gets filtered out fast
Validation is strict, but it's the only thing keeping Social Mining from turning into noise farming. Slow review is the real tradeoff, not unfair rejection.
If you create content and want Web3 income without spending a dime upfront, this is worth your time.
#SocialMining #Web3 #DAOLabs
@DAO Labs is upgrading Social Mining on June 29, here's my honest take
Social Mining has been one of the few post to earn systems that actually pays for real work. You create content, tweets, threads, graphics, articles for blockchain projects, submit it, get reviewed, and earn points that convert to $USDT or project tokens. Zero capital required, just consistency.
I've contributed across hubs like DAOVERSE for a while now, and the earnings are genuine when the work is genuine. That part of the system isn't broken.
What's been clunky is tracking everything, points here, tasks there, submissions scattered across hubs like you're running five jobs at once. The upcoming upgrade is built to fix exactly that, one streamlined flow for tasks, tracking, and rewards.
On validation, my honest view
→ Quality content gets paid, no shortcuts needed
→ Lazy copy paste content gets filtered out fast
Validation is strict, but it's the only thing keeping Social Mining from turning into noise farming. Slow review is the real tradeoff, not unfair rejection.
If you create content and want Web3 income without spending a dime upfront, this is worth your time.
#SocialMining #Web3 #DAOLabs
Social Mining has been one of the few post to earn systems that actually pays for real work. You create content, tweets, threads, graphics, articles for blockchain projects, submit it, get reviewed, and earn points that convert to $USDT or project tokens. Zero capital required, just consistency.
I've contributed across hubs like DAOVERSE for a while now, and the earnings are genuine when the work is genuine. That part of the system isn't broken.
What's been clunky is tracking everything, points here, tasks there, submissions scattered across hubs like you're running five jobs at once. The upcoming upgrade is built to fix exactly that, one streamlined flow for tasks, tracking, and rewards.
On validation, my honest view
→ Quality content gets paid, no shortcuts needed
→ Lazy copy paste content gets filtered out fast
Validation is strict, but it's the only thing keeping Social Mining from turning into noise farming. Slow review is the real tradeoff, not unfair rejection.
If you create content and want Web3 income without spending a dime upfront, this is worth your time.
#SocialMining #Web3 #DAOLabs
7
4
776
·
--
ເບິ່ງການແປ
Sau khi đọc bài viết của Ipek Celik, điều mình tâm đắc nhất là:
Cộng đồng chất lượng luôn quan trọng hơn cộng đồng đông người.
Trong Web3, việc thu hút hàng nghìn người tham gia một chiến dịch airdrop không quá khó. Nhưng biến họ thành những người thực sự hiểu dự án, tin tưởng dự án và gắn bó lâu dài mới là điều tạo nên giá trị bền vững.
Đó là điều mình thấy thú vị ở mô hình Social Mining của DAO Labs. Thay vì chỉ thưởng cho tương tác, họ tập trung xây dựng những thành viên thực sự tham gia vào hành trình phát triển của dự án. Khi cộng đồng hiểu sản phẩm và tầm nhìn, họ không chỉ là người dùng mà còn trở thành những người ủng hộ mạnh mẽ nhất.
Trong một thị trường đầy những con số "ảo", có lẽ chất lượng cộng đồng vẫn là lợi thế cạnh tranh khó sao chép nhất.
#DAOLabs #SocialMining #BlockchainInfrastructure
Sau khi đọc bài viết của Ipek Celik, điều mình tâm đắc nhất là:
Cộng đồng chất lượng luôn quan trọng hơn cộng đồng đông người.
Trong Web3, việc thu hút hàng nghìn người tham gia một chiến dịch airdrop không quá khó. Nhưng biến họ thành những người thực sự hiểu dự án, tin tưởng dự án và gắn bó lâu dài mới là điều tạo nên giá trị bền vững.
Đó là điều mình thấy thú vị ở mô hình Social Mining của DAO Labs. Thay vì chỉ thưởng cho tương tác, họ tập trung xây dựng những thành viên thực sự tham gia vào hành trình phát triển của dự án. Khi cộng đồng hiểu sản phẩm và tầm nhìn, họ không chỉ là người dùng mà còn trở thành những người ủng hộ mạnh mẽ nhất.
Trong một thị trường đầy những con số "ảo", có lẽ chất lượng cộng đồng vẫn là lợi thế cạnh tranh khó sao chép nhất.
#DAOLabs #SocialMining #BlockchainInfrastructure
Cộng đồng chất lượng luôn quan trọng hơn cộng đồng đông người.
Trong Web3, việc thu hút hàng nghìn người tham gia một chiến dịch airdrop không quá khó. Nhưng biến họ thành những người thực sự hiểu dự án, tin tưởng dự án và gắn bó lâu dài mới là điều tạo nên giá trị bền vững.
Đó là điều mình thấy thú vị ở mô hình Social Mining của DAO Labs. Thay vì chỉ thưởng cho tương tác, họ tập trung xây dựng những thành viên thực sự tham gia vào hành trình phát triển của dự án. Khi cộng đồng hiểu sản phẩm và tầm nhìn, họ không chỉ là người dùng mà còn trở thành những người ủng hộ mạnh mẽ nhất.
Trong một thị trường đầy những con số "ảo", có lẽ chất lượng cộng đồng vẫn là lợi thế cạnh tranh khó sao chép nhất.
#DAOLabs #SocialMining #BlockchainInfrastructure
1
1
1
101
·
--
ເບິ່ງການແປ
Most people think Web3 failure comes from bad tech.
That’s wrong.
It comes from poor evaluation.
After reading DAO Labs’ “4 Successes, 1 Failure” report, one thing is clear:
👉 Not every project deserves your attention — and definitely not your trust.
What stood out to me is their Fair Launchpad Structure.
Instead of chasing hype, DAO Labs evaluates:
• Token distribution fairness
• Vesting & unlock schedules
• Real market readiness (not inflated FDV)
• Contract compliance AFTER launch
This is where most platforms fail — they stop at launch.
DAO Labs doesn’t.
The Autonomys case proves it:
A project can look solid early… but once they violated token distribution terms, DAO Labs acted.
That’s accountability Web3 desperately needs.
But beyond metrics, what really impressed me is the Social Mining Hub model.
This isn’t just about marketing.
It’s about:
→ Educating contributors
→ Building real users
→ Turning participants into long-term holders
That’s the difference:
❌ Traditional launchpads create hype
✅ DAO Labs creates conviction
And conviction is what sustains ecosystems.
In the end, community size doesn’t matter.
Community quality does.
Because a small group of informed, loyal users will always outperform a crowd of airdrop hunters.
That’s the real alpha.
#DAOLabs #SocialMining
Read the full article here
https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
Most people think Web3 failure comes from bad tech.
That’s wrong.
It comes from poor evaluation.
After reading DAO Labs’ “4 Successes, 1 Failure” report, one thing is clear:
👉 Not every project deserves your attention — and definitely not your trust.
What stood out to me is their Fair Launchpad Structure.
Instead of chasing hype, DAO Labs evaluates:
• Token distribution fairness
• Vesting & unlock schedules
• Real market readiness (not inflated FDV)
• Contract compliance AFTER launch
This is where most platforms fail — they stop at launch.
DAO Labs doesn’t.
The Autonomys case proves it:
A project can look solid early… but once they violated token distribution terms, DAO Labs acted.
That’s accountability Web3 desperately needs.
But beyond metrics, what really impressed me is the Social Mining Hub model.
This isn’t just about marketing.
It’s about:
→ Educating contributors
→ Building real users
→ Turning participants into long-term holders
That’s the difference:
❌ Traditional launchpads create hype
✅ DAO Labs creates conviction
And conviction is what sustains ecosystems.
In the end, community size doesn’t matter.
Community quality does.
Because a small group of informed, loyal users will always outperform a crowd of airdrop hunters.
That’s the real alpha.
#DAOLabs #SocialMining
Read the full article here
https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
That’s wrong.
It comes from poor evaluation.
After reading DAO Labs’ “4 Successes, 1 Failure” report, one thing is clear:
👉 Not every project deserves your attention — and definitely not your trust.
What stood out to me is their Fair Launchpad Structure.
Instead of chasing hype, DAO Labs evaluates:
• Token distribution fairness
• Vesting & unlock schedules
• Real market readiness (not inflated FDV)
• Contract compliance AFTER launch
This is where most platforms fail — they stop at launch.
DAO Labs doesn’t.
The Autonomys case proves it:
A project can look solid early… but once they violated token distribution terms, DAO Labs acted.
That’s accountability Web3 desperately needs.
But beyond metrics, what really impressed me is the Social Mining Hub model.
This isn’t just about marketing.
It’s about:
→ Educating contributors
→ Building real users
→ Turning participants into long-term holders
That’s the difference:
❌ Traditional launchpads create hype
✅ DAO Labs creates conviction
And conviction is what sustains ecosystems.
In the end, community size doesn’t matter.
Community quality does.
Because a small group of informed, loyal users will always outperform a crowd of airdrop hunters.
That’s the real alpha.
#DAOLabs #SocialMining
Read the full article here
https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
6
1
4
142
·
--
ເປັນຄວາມຈິງບາງສ່ວນ
ບົດຄວາມ
The Detective Standard: Bakit Iniimbestigahan ng DAO Labs Bago Ito NamumuhunanAng pinaka-nagsisiwalat na bagay na maipapakita sa iyo ng isang launchpad ay hindi ang pinakamagandang deal nito.
Ito ang isa na iniwan nito.
@DAOLabs may apat na tagumpay sa tala at isang kahihinatnan na ipinatupad. Ang ratio na iyon ay hindi kahinaan sa modelo nila. Patunay iyon na gumagana talaga ang modelo.
Bago pa man makapasok ang kahit iisang proyekto sa Social Mining ecosystem, nililinis muna nito kung ano ang tinatawag ng BD team na Detective Task Matrix. Limang forensic layers: pagsusuri sa tunay na market readiness, equity ng token distribution sa mga VCs, team at community, mahigpit na limitasyon sa TGE unlocks para pigilan ang day-one dumps, mandatory cliff periods na may long-term linear vesting, at tuloy-tuloy na smart contract monitoring na hindi tumitigil sa paglagda. Hindi ito dahil sa due diligence bilang pormalidad. Ito ang due diligence bilang disiplina.
The Detective Standard: Bakit Iniimbestigahan ng DAO Labs Bago Ito Namumuhunan
Ang pinaka-nagsisiwalat na bagay na maipapakita sa iyo ng isang launchpad ay hindi ang pinakamagandang deal nito.
Ito ang isa na iniwan nito.
@DAO Labs may apat na tagumpay sa tala at isang kahihinatnan na ipinatupad. Ang ratio na iyon ay hindi kahinaan sa modelo nila. Patunay iyon na gumagana talaga ang modelo.
Bago pa man makapasok ang kahit iisang proyekto sa Social Mining ecosystem, nililinis muna nito kung ano ang tinatawag ng BD team na Detective Task Matrix. Limang forensic layers: pagsusuri sa tunay na market readiness, equity ng token distribution sa mga VCs, team at community, mahigpit na limitasyon sa TGE unlocks para pigilan ang day-one dumps, mandatory cliff periods na may long-term linear vesting, at tuloy-tuloy na smart contract monitoring na hindi tumitigil sa paglagda. Hindi ito dahil sa due diligence bilang pormalidad. Ito ang due diligence bilang disiplina.
Ito ang isa na iniwan nito.
@DAO Labs may apat na tagumpay sa tala at isang kahihinatnan na ipinatupad. Ang ratio na iyon ay hindi kahinaan sa modelo nila. Patunay iyon na gumagana talaga ang modelo.
Bago pa man makapasok ang kahit iisang proyekto sa Social Mining ecosystem, nililinis muna nito kung ano ang tinatawag ng BD team na Detective Task Matrix. Limang forensic layers: pagsusuri sa tunay na market readiness, equity ng token distribution sa mga VCs, team at community, mahigpit na limitasyon sa TGE unlocks para pigilan ang day-one dumps, mandatory cliff periods na may long-term linear vesting, at tuloy-tuloy na smart contract monitoring na hindi tumitigil sa paglagda. Hindi ito dahil sa due diligence bilang pormalidad. Ito ang due diligence bilang disiplina.
5
5
262
·
--
ເປັນຄວາມຈິງບາງສ່ວນ
ບົດຄວາມ
Ang Tiwala ay Hindi Ibinibigay, Naitatayo: Ang Pananaw Ko sa DAO Labs' Blockchain Detective ReportUsapan natin ang isang bagay na kasinghalaga sa negosyo gaya ng sa araw-araw na buhay: tiwala. Sa mundo ng crypto, ang tiwala ay seryosong usapin—matagal itong binubuo at isang segundo lang ang kailangan para mawala.
[DAO Labs](https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/cpro/daolabs?l=en-la&r=ht5gxjlh&uc=web_square_share_link&us=copylink) sa mga nakalipas na apat na taon ay nagpagulong ng mga pang-edukasyon at makabuluhang content para sa mga Web3 project sa pamamagitan ng #SocialMining platform nito. Sa buong panahong ito, nabuo ng kumpanya ang isang matibay at hindi matitinag na reputasyon na nakabatay nang husto sa transparency ng mga produkto at serbisyong iniaalok nito.
Maraming tao ang nag-iisip na ang sangay ng Business Development (BD) ng isang crypto company ay basta tungkol sa pagse-sign ng deals sa kahit sino mang may dalang malaking bag ng pera. Pero #DAOLabs dumaraan sila sa ibang direksyon; parang mga tunay na imbestigador sila. Ang kanilang team ay nagpapatakbo ng mahigpit, lubhang mahigpit na proseso ng pag-filter bago i-onboard ang kahit sinong kliyente. Nagbubukas ito ng halatang tanong: bakit kailangang maging napakahigpit? Simple pero mahalaga ang sagot: para masigurong ang proyekto ay talagang kumikita ng atensyon, oras, at tiwala ng komunidad.
Ang Tiwala ay Hindi Ibinibigay, Naitatayo: Ang Pananaw Ko sa DAO Labs' Blockchain Detective Report
Usapan natin ang isang bagay na kasinghalaga sa negosyo gaya ng sa araw-araw na buhay: tiwala. Sa mundo ng crypto, ang tiwala ay seryosong usapin—matagal itong binubuo at isang segundo lang ang kailangan para mawala.
DAO Labs sa mga nakalipas na apat na taon ay nagpagulong ng mga pang-edukasyon at makabuluhang content para sa mga Web3 project sa pamamagitan ng #SocialMining platform nito. Sa buong panahong ito, nabuo ng kumpanya ang isang matibay at hindi matitinag na reputasyon na nakabatay nang husto sa transparency ng mga produkto at serbisyong iniaalok nito.
Maraming tao ang nag-iisip na ang sangay ng Business Development (BD) ng isang crypto company ay basta tungkol sa pagse-sign ng deals sa kahit sino mang may dalang malaking bag ng pera. Pero #DAOLabs dumaraan sila sa ibang direksyon; parang mga tunay na imbestigador sila. Ang kanilang team ay nagpapatakbo ng mahigpit, lubhang mahigpit na proseso ng pag-filter bago i-onboard ang kahit sinong kliyente. Nagbubukas ito ng halatang tanong: bakit kailangang maging napakahigpit? Simple pero mahalaga ang sagot: para masigurong ang proyekto ay talagang kumikita ng atensyon, oras, at tiwala ng komunidad.
DAO Labs sa mga nakalipas na apat na taon ay nagpagulong ng mga pang-edukasyon at makabuluhang content para sa mga Web3 project sa pamamagitan ng #SocialMining platform nito. Sa buong panahong ito, nabuo ng kumpanya ang isang matibay at hindi matitinag na reputasyon na nakabatay nang husto sa transparency ng mga produkto at serbisyong iniaalok nito.
Maraming tao ang nag-iisip na ang sangay ng Business Development (BD) ng isang crypto company ay basta tungkol sa pagse-sign ng deals sa kahit sino mang may dalang malaking bag ng pera. Pero #DAOLabs dumaraan sila sa ibang direksyon; parang mga tunay na imbestigador sila. Ang kanilang team ay nagpapatakbo ng mahigpit, lubhang mahigpit na proseso ng pag-filter bago i-onboard ang kahit sinong kliyente. Nagbubukas ito ng halatang tanong: bakit kailangang maging napakahigpit? Simple pero mahalaga ang sagot: para masigurong ang proyekto ay talagang kumikita ng atensyon, oras, at tiwala ng komunidad.
4
1
4
148
ບົດຄວາມ
ເບິ່ງການແປ
Trust Over Hype: What 4 Wins and 1 Failure Reveal About Real Web3 Community BuildingSo i just finished reading the @DAOLabs article on it successes and failures on different projects and all i can say is wow....web3 community really need to emulate what they're doing and building for themselves.
As we all know,
Not Every Project Deserves Your Trust and that's exactly why this article from DAO Labs caught my attention and i agree with everything said in it .
In a market where anyone can launch a token, buy followers, create hype, and disappear overnight, trust has become one of the most valuable assets in Web3.
After reading the article, i discovered there were breakdown of 4 successful projects and 1 project that violated its agreement, and one thing became very clear to me...which is,
Community growth means nothing without accountability. What impressed me most wasn't the success stories it was the fact that DAO Labs openly discussed a failure case.
Many launchpads only showcase wins. DAO Labs chose to share both successes and mistakes, giving the community a transparent look into how projects are evaluated before being introduced to Social Miners.
These were things that stood out for me:
1. The Fair Launchpad Structure prioritizes safety over hype...Instead of rushing projects to market, DAO Labs conducts deep due diligence. The goal isn't simply launching more projects it's launching projects that deserve community trust.
2. The violation case is a lesson in accountability
One project failed to honor its commitments after benefiting from community support. Rather than ignoring the issue, DAO Labs enforced consequences and used the experience to strengthen its evaluation framework. This right here is exactly the kind of accountability Web3 needs more of.
3. Social Mining Hubs create believers, not bounty hunters
Traditional campaigns often attract users looking for quick rewards. Social Mining takes a different approach by encouraging education, engagement, and long-term participation. The result is a community of contributors who understand the project instead of simply farming incentives.
3. Community quality beats community size
A project with 10,000 genuinely engaged supporters will always outperform a project with 100,000 inactive followers. Real discussions, Real contributions, Real conviction. That's where sustainable growth comes from.
My biggest takeaway from the article is that successful ecosystems aren't built by chasing numbers they're built by creating trust, maintaining standards, and holding everyone accountable. The future of Web3 belongs to projects that can prove their credibility, not just advertise it.
Y'all can Read the full article here and tell me what you think in the comment
https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
I'm curious, what do y'all think matters more in Web3 today? Community size or Community quality, Let me know ur thoughts
#DAOLabs #SocialMining #Web3 #BinanceSquareTalks #Community
Trust Over Hype: What 4 Wins and 1 Failure Reveal About Real Web3 Community Building
So i just finished reading the @DAO Labs article on it successes and failures on different projects and all i can say is wow....web3 community really need to emulate what they're doing and building for themselves.
As we all know,
Not Every Project Deserves Your Trust and that's exactly why this article from DAO Labs caught my attention and i agree with everything said in it .
In a market where anyone can launch a token, buy followers, create hype, and disappear overnight, trust has become one of the most valuable assets in Web3.
After reading the article, i discovered there were breakdown of 4 successful projects and 1 project that violated its agreement, and one thing became very clear to me...which is,
Community growth means nothing without accountability. What impressed me most wasn't the success stories it was the fact that DAO Labs openly discussed a failure case.
Many launchpads only showcase wins. DAO Labs chose to share both successes and mistakes, giving the community a transparent look into how projects are evaluated before being introduced to Social Miners.
These were things that stood out for me:
1. The Fair Launchpad Structure prioritizes safety over hype...Instead of rushing projects to market, DAO Labs conducts deep due diligence. The goal isn't simply launching more projects it's launching projects that deserve community trust.
2. The violation case is a lesson in accountability
One project failed to honor its commitments after benefiting from community support. Rather than ignoring the issue, DAO Labs enforced consequences and used the experience to strengthen its evaluation framework. This right here is exactly the kind of accountability Web3 needs more of.
3. Social Mining Hubs create believers, not bounty hunters
Traditional campaigns often attract users looking for quick rewards. Social Mining takes a different approach by encouraging education, engagement, and long-term participation. The result is a community of contributors who understand the project instead of simply farming incentives.
3. Community quality beats community size
A project with 10,000 genuinely engaged supporters will always outperform a project with 100,000 inactive followers. Real discussions, Real contributions, Real conviction. That's where sustainable growth comes from.
My biggest takeaway from the article is that successful ecosystems aren't built by chasing numbers they're built by creating trust, maintaining standards, and holding everyone accountable. The future of Web3 belongs to projects that can prove their credibility, not just advertise it.
Y'all can Read the full article here and tell me what you think in the comment
https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
I'm curious, what do y'all think matters more in Web3 today? Community size or Community quality, Let me know ur thoughts
#DAOLabs #SocialMining #Web3 #BinanceSquareTalks #Community
As we all know,
Not Every Project Deserves Your Trust and that's exactly why this article from DAO Labs caught my attention and i agree with everything said in it .
In a market where anyone can launch a token, buy followers, create hype, and disappear overnight, trust has become one of the most valuable assets in Web3.
After reading the article, i discovered there were breakdown of 4 successful projects and 1 project that violated its agreement, and one thing became very clear to me...which is,
Community growth means nothing without accountability. What impressed me most wasn't the success stories it was the fact that DAO Labs openly discussed a failure case.
Many launchpads only showcase wins. DAO Labs chose to share both successes and mistakes, giving the community a transparent look into how projects are evaluated before being introduced to Social Miners.
These were things that stood out for me:
1. The Fair Launchpad Structure prioritizes safety over hype...Instead of rushing projects to market, DAO Labs conducts deep due diligence. The goal isn't simply launching more projects it's launching projects that deserve community trust.
2. The violation case is a lesson in accountability
One project failed to honor its commitments after benefiting from community support. Rather than ignoring the issue, DAO Labs enforced consequences and used the experience to strengthen its evaluation framework. This right here is exactly the kind of accountability Web3 needs more of.
3. Social Mining Hubs create believers, not bounty hunters
Traditional campaigns often attract users looking for quick rewards. Social Mining takes a different approach by encouraging education, engagement, and long-term participation. The result is a community of contributors who understand the project instead of simply farming incentives.
3. Community quality beats community size
A project with 10,000 genuinely engaged supporters will always outperform a project with 100,000 inactive followers. Real discussions, Real contributions, Real conviction. That's where sustainable growth comes from.
My biggest takeaway from the article is that successful ecosystems aren't built by chasing numbers they're built by creating trust, maintaining standards, and holding everyone accountable. The future of Web3 belongs to projects that can prove their credibility, not just advertise it.
Y'all can Read the full article here and tell me what you think in the comment
https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
I'm curious, what do y'all think matters more in Web3 today? Community size or Community quality, Let me know ur thoughts
#DAOLabs #SocialMining #Web3 #BinanceSquareTalks #Community
1
107
ເບິ່ງການແປ
🚨 Why Rigorous Vetting is Non-Negotiable in Web3: Lessons from DAO Labs’ Latest Deep Dive
Just finished the eye-opening article from DAO Labs’ BD team. They don’t just onboard projects to Social Mining—they investigate them like detectives. 4 projects passed their strict framework with flying colors, building real value and loyal communities. 1 violated the contract, highlighting exactly why blind hype can burn everyone. 
Key Takeaway on DAO Labs’ Fair Launchpad Structure for Web3 Project Safety:
This isn’t another launchpad chasing volume. Their Detective Task Matrix acts as a robust filter—evaluating tokenomics, team accountability, delivery promises, and community alignment before integration. It means safer entries for social miners, reduced rug risks, and projects that actually deliver sustainable growth instead of quick pumps and dumps. In a space full of speculation, this level of due diligence is the backbone of trust. 
The violation case? A stark reminder of accountability in crypto. Contracts aren’t suggestions—breaches erode community faith fast. DAO Labs’ model enforces consequences and shares the lessons publicly, turning setbacks into stronger standards for everyone.
This is why Social Mining Hubs stand out: they foster loyal investors through real contribution not just airdrop farming. Quality over quantity every time.
Personal Reflection: Community quality will always trump size. A smaller, aligned, high-rep group of social miners builds more lasting value than thousands of fleeting hype-chasers. DAO Labs gets this.
Huge props to the team for pulling back the curtain. This is how we professionalize Web3. 
Read the full article here: [https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects]
#DAOLabs #SocialMining
🚨 Why Rigorous Vetting is Non-Negotiable in Web3: Lessons from DAO Labs’ Latest Deep Dive
Just finished the eye-opening article from DAO Labs’ BD team. They don’t just onboard projects to Social Mining—they investigate them like detectives. 4 projects passed their strict framework with flying colors, building real value and loyal communities. 1 violated the contract, highlighting exactly why blind hype can burn everyone. 
Key Takeaway on DAO Labs’ Fair Launchpad Structure for Web3 Project Safety:
This isn’t another launchpad chasing volume. Their Detective Task Matrix acts as a robust filter—evaluating tokenomics, team accountability, delivery promises, and community alignment before integration. It means safer entries for social miners, reduced rug risks, and projects that actually deliver sustainable growth instead of quick pumps and dumps. In a space full of speculation, this level of due diligence is the backbone of trust. 
The violation case? A stark reminder of accountability in crypto. Contracts aren’t suggestions—breaches erode community faith fast. DAO Labs’ model enforces consequences and shares the lessons publicly, turning setbacks into stronger standards for everyone.
This is why Social Mining Hubs stand out: they foster loyal investors through real contribution not just airdrop farming. Quality over quantity every time.
Personal Reflection: Community quality will always trump size. A smaller, aligned, high-rep group of social miners builds more lasting value than thousands of fleeting hype-chasers. DAO Labs gets this.
Huge props to the team for pulling back the curtain. This is how we professionalize Web3. 
Read the full article here: [https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects]
#DAOLabs #SocialMining
Just finished the eye-opening article from DAO Labs’ BD team. They don’t just onboard projects to Social Mining—they investigate them like detectives. 4 projects passed their strict framework with flying colors, building real value and loyal communities. 1 violated the contract, highlighting exactly why blind hype can burn everyone. 
Key Takeaway on DAO Labs’ Fair Launchpad Structure for Web3 Project Safety:
This isn’t another launchpad chasing volume. Their Detective Task Matrix acts as a robust filter—evaluating tokenomics, team accountability, delivery promises, and community alignment before integration. It means safer entries for social miners, reduced rug risks, and projects that actually deliver sustainable growth instead of quick pumps and dumps. In a space full of speculation, this level of due diligence is the backbone of trust. 
The violation case? A stark reminder of accountability in crypto. Contracts aren’t suggestions—breaches erode community faith fast. DAO Labs’ model enforces consequences and shares the lessons publicly, turning setbacks into stronger standards for everyone.
This is why Social Mining Hubs stand out: they foster loyal investors through real contribution not just airdrop farming. Quality over quantity every time.
Personal Reflection: Community quality will always trump size. A smaller, aligned, high-rep group of social miners builds more lasting value than thousands of fleeting hype-chasers. DAO Labs gets this.
Huge props to the team for pulling back the curtain. This is how we professionalize Web3. 
Read the full article here: [https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects]
#DAOLabs #SocialMining
107
ເບິ່ງການແປ
Web3 doesn’t fail because of tech—it fails when vetting and accountability are weak.
The “4 successes, 1 failure” case from DAO Labs shows why structured evaluation matters. Projects like @nemofficial, @MultiversX, @avax, and @RWA_inc_ thrived under strong alignment and Fair Launchpad standards, while the Autonomys case highlights what happens when commitments break down.
Social Mining Hubs shift incentives from short-term airdrop chasing to sustained contribution, building real ecosystem participants instead of passive hunters.
Unlike traditional launchpads, DAO Labs focuses on behavior, consistency, and community alignment—not just hype or capital.
Bottom line: community quality matters more than community size.
https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
#DAOLabs
#SocialMining
Web3 doesn’t fail because of tech—it fails when vetting and accountability are weak.
The “4 successes, 1 failure” case from DAO Labs shows why structured evaluation matters. Projects like @nemofficial, @MultiversX, @avax, and @RWA_inc_ thrived under strong alignment and Fair Launchpad standards, while the Autonomys case highlights what happens when commitments break down.
Social Mining Hubs shift incentives from short-term airdrop chasing to sustained contribution, building real ecosystem participants instead of passive hunters.
Unlike traditional launchpads, DAO Labs focuses on behavior, consistency, and community alignment—not just hype or capital.
Bottom line: community quality matters more than community size.
https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
#DAOLabs
#SocialMining
The “4 successes, 1 failure” case from DAO Labs shows why structured evaluation matters. Projects like @nemofficial, @MultiversX, @avax, and @RWA_inc_ thrived under strong alignment and Fair Launchpad standards, while the Autonomys case highlights what happens when commitments break down.
Social Mining Hubs shift incentives from short-term airdrop chasing to sustained contribution, building real ecosystem participants instead of passive hunters.
Unlike traditional launchpads, DAO Labs focuses on behavior, consistency, and community alignment—not just hype or capital.
Bottom line: community quality matters more than community size.
https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
#DAOLabs
#SocialMining
199
·
--
ສັນຍານກະທິງ
ເບິ່ງການແປ
WhoTweets.com: DAO Labs’ New Home for Social Mining
DAO Labs has migrated its Social Mining platform from ilo.dao-labs.com to whotweets.com, introducing a fresh identity and major upgrades.
Why the Migration & New Branding?
The new domain offers better memorability, professionalism, and scalability. “WhoTweets” captures the essence of rewarding authentic voices driving Web3 conversations, elevating Social Mining beyond an experimental tool into a dedicated ecosystem.
Platform Improvements
The upgrade includes:
New Dashboard - Cleaner and faster interface.
Enhanced X Scoring – Higher rewards for verified & genuine activity.
Reels & Shorts Feed – Native short-form video support.
KOL Delegation – Safely assign tasks to trusted accounts.
Meet & Match – New networking and collaboration tools.
Engagement Safety – Smart limits for sustainable activity.
@DAOLabs
Benefits for Miners
These features improve user experience, boost earnings through quality contributions, reduce risks, and enable better collaboration — all while keeping the same rewarding protocol.Your accounts, data, points, and rewards remain 100% unchanged. Just log in at the new domain.
My Take
This move strengthens Social Mining’s future by making it more accessible, efficient, and aligned with modern content trends. It cements “Proof of Value” as a viable path in Web3
Start mining now: whotweets.com
Official announcement: https://x.com/TheDAOLabs/status/2071914895377842359
#WhoTweets #SocialMining #DAOLabs
WhoTweets.com: DAO Labs’ New Home for Social Mining
DAO Labs has migrated its Social Mining platform from ilo.dao-labs.com to whotweets.com, introducing a fresh identity and major upgrades.
Why the Migration & New Branding?
The new domain offers better memorability, professionalism, and scalability. “WhoTweets” captures the essence of rewarding authentic voices driving Web3 conversations, elevating Social Mining beyond an experimental tool into a dedicated ecosystem.
Platform Improvements
The upgrade includes:
New Dashboard - Cleaner and faster interface.
Enhanced X Scoring – Higher rewards for verified & genuine activity.
Reels & Shorts Feed – Native short-form video support.
KOL Delegation – Safely assign tasks to trusted accounts.
Meet & Match – New networking and collaboration tools.
Engagement Safety – Smart limits for sustainable activity.
@DAO Labs
Benefits for Miners
These features improve user experience, boost earnings through quality contributions, reduce risks, and enable better collaboration — all while keeping the same rewarding protocol.Your accounts, data, points, and rewards remain 100% unchanged. Just log in at the new domain.
My Take
This move strengthens Social Mining’s future by making it more accessible, efficient, and aligned with modern content trends. It cements “Proof of Value” as a viable path in Web3
Start mining now: whotweets.com
Official announcement: https://x.com/TheDAOLabs/status/2071914895377842359
#WhoTweets #SocialMining #DAOLabs
DAO Labs has migrated its Social Mining platform from ilo.dao-labs.com to whotweets.com, introducing a fresh identity and major upgrades.
Why the Migration & New Branding?
The new domain offers better memorability, professionalism, and scalability. “WhoTweets” captures the essence of rewarding authentic voices driving Web3 conversations, elevating Social Mining beyond an experimental tool into a dedicated ecosystem.
Platform Improvements
The upgrade includes:
New Dashboard - Cleaner and faster interface.
Enhanced X Scoring – Higher rewards for verified & genuine activity.
Reels & Shorts Feed – Native short-form video support.
KOL Delegation – Safely assign tasks to trusted accounts.
Meet & Match – New networking and collaboration tools.
Engagement Safety – Smart limits for sustainable activity.
@DAO Labs
Benefits for Miners
These features improve user experience, boost earnings through quality contributions, reduce risks, and enable better collaboration — all while keeping the same rewarding protocol.Your accounts, data, points, and rewards remain 100% unchanged. Just log in at the new domain.
My Take
This move strengthens Social Mining’s future by making it more accessible, efficient, and aligned with modern content trends. It cements “Proof of Value” as a viable path in Web3
Start mining now: whotweets.com
Official announcement: https://x.com/TheDAOLabs/status/2071914895377842359
#WhoTweets #SocialMining #DAOLabs
1
96
ເບິ່ງການແປ
Why Proof of Work Matters More Than Proof of Activity in SocialFiAfter reading @DAOLabs article, "Proof of Work and Retainability in SocialFi: What Real Validation Looks Like," I found myself reflecting on my own journey in #SocialMining .
One statement stood out immediately:
"SocialFi doesn't have an engagement problem. It has a validation problem."
At first, this may sound surprising. SocialFi platforms generate thousands of posts, comments, likes, shares, and community interactions every day. Participation is everywhere.
But participation alone does not automatically create value.
My Experience with Social Mining
When I first joined Social Mining, my focus was simple: complete as many tasks as possible.
I believed that more completed tasks meant more contribution and, ultimately, better rewards.
However, experience taught me something different.
Many of the tasks I rushed through earned fewer points after validation. They met the basic requirements, but they lacked depth, originality, and meaningful impact.
The tasks that consistently performed better were the ones where I slowed down, researched thoroughly, understood the project's goals, and invested genuine effort into creating quality content.
Over time, I realized that value is not measured by volume.
Value is measured by impact.
Proof of Activity vs Proof of Work
This distinction forms the core message of the #DAOLabs article.
Proof of Activity measures participation.
Proof of Work measures contribution.
A contributor may complete dozens of tasks and generate significant activity. Another contributor may complete fewer tasks but create educational content, help community members, or drive meaningful discussions.
Both contributors appear active.
Yet their impact may be vastly different.
This is where validation becomes critical.
Why Validation Matters
Without validation, communities risk rewarding quantity over quality.
Projects may appear active while genuine contributors become difficult to identify.
Low-effort engagement can inflate metrics without creating sustainable growth.
Validation helps separate meaningful contribution from simple participation.
It asks an important question:
Did this activity actually create value?
DAOLabs' Three-Stage Validation Framework
What I found most interesting was DAOLabs' approach to validation.
1. Peer-to-Peer Validation
Community members review submissions and verify whether contributions genuinely fulfill their intended purpose.
2. Quality Validation
Submissions are assessed for originality, relevance, effort, and overall value.
3. Results Validation
The final stage evaluates outcomes and impact.
Did the contribution support project goals?
Did it generate meaningful engagement?
Did it create measurable results?
This framework recognizes that task completion is only the beginning of contribution, not the end.
One lesson Social Mining has taught me is that creating value requires intention.
Anyone can complete tasks.
Not everyone takes the time to research, create original insights, support communities, and deliver meaningful results.
As SocialFi continues to evolve, I believe platforms that prioritize validation will build stronger communities and healthier ecosystems.
Because in the long run, quality contributions will always matter more than simple activity.
Read the full Article here: https://dao-labs.com/posts/proof-of-work-and-retainability-in-socialfi-what-real-validation-looks-like-part-1
Why Proof of Work Matters More Than Proof of Activity in SocialFi
After reading @DAO Labs article, "Proof of Work and Retainability in SocialFi: What Real Validation Looks Like," I found myself reflecting on my own journey in #SocialMining .
One statement stood out immediately:
"SocialFi doesn't have an engagement problem. It has a validation problem."
At first, this may sound surprising. SocialFi platforms generate thousands of posts, comments, likes, shares, and community interactions every day. Participation is everywhere.
But participation alone does not automatically create value.
My Experience with Social Mining
When I first joined Social Mining, my focus was simple: complete as many tasks as possible.
I believed that more completed tasks meant more contribution and, ultimately, better rewards.
However, experience taught me something different.
Many of the tasks I rushed through earned fewer points after validation. They met the basic requirements, but they lacked depth, originality, and meaningful impact.
The tasks that consistently performed better were the ones where I slowed down, researched thoroughly, understood the project's goals, and invested genuine effort into creating quality content.
Over time, I realized that value is not measured by volume.
Value is measured by impact.
Proof of Activity vs Proof of Work
This distinction forms the core message of the #DAOLabs article.
Proof of Activity measures participation.
Proof of Work measures contribution.
A contributor may complete dozens of tasks and generate significant activity. Another contributor may complete fewer tasks but create educational content, help community members, or drive meaningful discussions.
Both contributors appear active.
Yet their impact may be vastly different.
This is where validation becomes critical.
Why Validation Matters
Without validation, communities risk rewarding quantity over quality.
Projects may appear active while genuine contributors become difficult to identify.
Low-effort engagement can inflate metrics without creating sustainable growth.
Validation helps separate meaningful contribution from simple participation.
It asks an important question:
Did this activity actually create value?
DAOLabs' Three-Stage Validation Framework
What I found most interesting was DAOLabs' approach to validation.
1. Peer-to-Peer Validation
Community members review submissions and verify whether contributions genuinely fulfill their intended purpose.
2. Quality Validation
Submissions are assessed for originality, relevance, effort, and overall value.
3. Results Validation
The final stage evaluates outcomes and impact.
Did the contribution support project goals?
Did it generate meaningful engagement?
Did it create measurable results?
This framework recognizes that task completion is only the beginning of contribution, not the end.
One lesson Social Mining has taught me is that creating value requires intention.
Anyone can complete tasks.
Not everyone takes the time to research, create original insights, support communities, and deliver meaningful results.
As SocialFi continues to evolve, I believe platforms that prioritize validation will build stronger communities and healthier ecosystems.
Because in the long run, quality contributions will always matter more than simple activity.
Read the full Article here: https://dao-labs.com/posts/proof-of-work-and-retainability-in-socialfi-what-real-validation-looks-like-part-1
One statement stood out immediately:
"SocialFi doesn't have an engagement problem. It has a validation problem."
At first, this may sound surprising. SocialFi platforms generate thousands of posts, comments, likes, shares, and community interactions every day. Participation is everywhere.
But participation alone does not automatically create value.
My Experience with Social Mining
When I first joined Social Mining, my focus was simple: complete as many tasks as possible.
I believed that more completed tasks meant more contribution and, ultimately, better rewards.
However, experience taught me something different.
Many of the tasks I rushed through earned fewer points after validation. They met the basic requirements, but they lacked depth, originality, and meaningful impact.
The tasks that consistently performed better were the ones where I slowed down, researched thoroughly, understood the project's goals, and invested genuine effort into creating quality content.
Over time, I realized that value is not measured by volume.
Value is measured by impact.
Proof of Activity vs Proof of Work
This distinction forms the core message of the #DAOLabs article.
Proof of Activity measures participation.
Proof of Work measures contribution.
A contributor may complete dozens of tasks and generate significant activity. Another contributor may complete fewer tasks but create educational content, help community members, or drive meaningful discussions.
Both contributors appear active.
Yet their impact may be vastly different.
This is where validation becomes critical.
Why Validation Matters
Without validation, communities risk rewarding quantity over quality.
Projects may appear active while genuine contributors become difficult to identify.
Low-effort engagement can inflate metrics without creating sustainable growth.
Validation helps separate meaningful contribution from simple participation.
It asks an important question:
Did this activity actually create value?
DAOLabs' Three-Stage Validation Framework
What I found most interesting was DAOLabs' approach to validation.
1. Peer-to-Peer Validation
Community members review submissions and verify whether contributions genuinely fulfill their intended purpose.
2. Quality Validation
Submissions are assessed for originality, relevance, effort, and overall value.
3. Results Validation
The final stage evaluates outcomes and impact.
Did the contribution support project goals?
Did it generate meaningful engagement?
Did it create measurable results?
This framework recognizes that task completion is only the beginning of contribution, not the end.
One lesson Social Mining has taught me is that creating value requires intention.
Anyone can complete tasks.
Not everyone takes the time to research, create original insights, support communities, and deliver meaningful results.
As SocialFi continues to evolve, I believe platforms that prioritize validation will build stronger communities and healthier ecosystems.
Because in the long run, quality contributions will always matter more than simple activity.
Read the full Article here: https://dao-labs.com/posts/proof-of-work-and-retainability-in-socialfi-what-real-validation-looks-like-part-1
1
83
·
--
Oka amava amakhulu esiwatholayo kule ndatshana ukuthi ikhwalithi yomphakathi ibaluleke ngaphezu kobukhulu bomphakathi. Iphrojekthi eqinile yeWeb3 ayakhiwa ngokutshela abantu abaningi—akhiwa ngokubandakanya abanikela abakholwa ngempela kule phrojekthi.
Imodeli ye-Social Mining ye-DAO Labs ikhuthaza ukubamba iqhaza okunenjongo esikhundleni sokuklomelisa i-hype yesikhashana. Lokhu kwakha i-ecosystem enempilo enabalandeli abathembekile kanye nokukhula kwesikhathi eside.
Njengoba iWeb3 iqhubeka nokuvela, ngikholelwa ukuthi le ndlela yokubeka umphakathi kuqala ingasiza ukwakha amaphrojekthi aphephile futhi ahlala isikhathi eside.
#DaoLabs
#Social Mining
🔗Indatshana: [https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects]
Oka amava amakhulu esiwatholayo kule ndatshana ukuthi ikhwalithi yomphakathi ibaluleke ngaphezu kobukhulu bomphakathi. Iphrojekthi eqinile yeWeb3 ayakhiwa ngokutshela abantu abaningi—akhiwa ngokubandakanya abanikela abakholwa ngempela kule phrojekthi.
Imodeli ye-Social Mining ye-DAO Labs ikhuthaza ukubamba iqhaza okunenjongo esikhundleni sokuklomelisa i-hype yesikhashana. Lokhu kwakha i-ecosystem enempilo enabalandeli abathembekile kanye nokukhula kwesikhathi eside.
Njengoba iWeb3 iqhubeka nokuvela, ngikholelwa ukuthi le ndlela yokubeka umphakathi kuqala ingasiza ukwakha amaphrojekthi aphephile futhi ahlala isikhathi eside.
#DaoLabs
#Social Mining
🔗Indatshana: [https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects]
Imodeli ye-Social Mining ye-DAO Labs ikhuthaza ukubamba iqhaza okunenjongo esikhundleni sokuklomelisa i-hype yesikhashana. Lokhu kwakha i-ecosystem enempilo enabalandeli abathembekile kanye nokukhula kwesikhathi eside.
Njengoba iWeb3 iqhubeka nokuvela, ngikholelwa ukuthi le ndlela yokubeka umphakathi kuqala ingasiza ukwakha amaphrojekthi aphephile futhi ahlala isikhathi eside.
#DaoLabs
#Social Mining
🔗Indatshana: [https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects]
1
104
·
--
ເບິ່ງການແປ
After reading @DAOLabs ' article, I realized that one of the biggest challenges in Web3 isn't discovering new projects—it's knowing which ones truly deserve a community's trust.
What makes the #DAOLabs evaluation model stand out is that it doesn't rely on narratives alone. Projects entering the #SocialMining ecosystem are assessed on valuation, token allocation, vesting schedules, TGE unlocks, and contract compliance before they ever reach the community.
The article's success stories involving Symbol, @MultiversX , @Avalanche , and RWA initiatives show that sustainable growth comes from strong foundations and engaged communities. Through #SocialMining Hubs, contributors don't just promote projects—they learn the technology, participate in ecosystem development, and often become long-term supporters.
I also found the Autonomys case particularly valuable because it highlighted why accountability matters. The fact that @DAOLabs continued monitoring projects after evaluation demonstrates that trust must be maintained, not assumed.
My biggest takeaway is that community quality matters more than community size. A smaller group of informed and committed contributors can create far more lasting value than a large audience driven only by short-term rewards.
The full article is worth reading for anyone interested in how project evaluation, accountability, and community building can shape the future of Web3:
[https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects]
After reading @DAO Labs ' article, I realized that one of the biggest challenges in Web3 isn't discovering new projects—it's knowing which ones truly deserve a community's trust.
What makes the #DAOLabs evaluation model stand out is that it doesn't rely on narratives alone. Projects entering the #SocialMining ecosystem are assessed on valuation, token allocation, vesting schedules, TGE unlocks, and contract compliance before they ever reach the community.
The article's success stories involving Symbol, @MultiversX Network , @Avalanche , and RWA initiatives show that sustainable growth comes from strong foundations and engaged communities. Through #SocialMining Hubs, contributors don't just promote projects—they learn the technology, participate in ecosystem development, and often become long-term supporters.
I also found the Autonomys case particularly valuable because it highlighted why accountability matters. The fact that @DAO Labs continued monitoring projects after evaluation demonstrates that trust must be maintained, not assumed.
My biggest takeaway is that community quality matters more than community size. A smaller group of informed and committed contributors can create far more lasting value than a large audience driven only by short-term rewards.
The full article is worth reading for anyone interested in how project evaluation, accountability, and community building can shape the future of Web3:
[https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects]
What makes the #DAOLabs evaluation model stand out is that it doesn't rely on narratives alone. Projects entering the #SocialMining ecosystem are assessed on valuation, token allocation, vesting schedules, TGE unlocks, and contract compliance before they ever reach the community.
The article's success stories involving Symbol, @MultiversX Network , @Avalanche , and RWA initiatives show that sustainable growth comes from strong foundations and engaged communities. Through #SocialMining Hubs, contributors don't just promote projects—they learn the technology, participate in ecosystem development, and often become long-term supporters.
I also found the Autonomys case particularly valuable because it highlighted why accountability matters. The fact that @DAO Labs continued monitoring projects after evaluation demonstrates that trust must be maintained, not assumed.
My biggest takeaway is that community quality matters more than community size. A smaller group of informed and committed contributors can create far more lasting value than a large audience driven only by short-term rewards.
The full article is worth reading for anyone interested in how project evaluation, accountability, and community building can shape the future of Web3:
[https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects]
1
144
សហគមន៍ Web3 ភាគច្រើនជួបប្រទះបញ្ហាដូចគ្នា៖ ការទាក់ទាញមនុស្សដែលមកតែពេលមានរង្វាន់ ហើយចាកចេញពេលដែលការលើកទឹកចិត្តរលត់។
បន្ទាប់ពីខ្ញុំអានអត្ថបទរបស់ DAO Labs ស្តីពីការវាយតម្លៃគម្រោង Web3 មួយចំណុចបានច្បាស់លាស់ចំពោះខ្ញុំ៖ កំណើនដែលអាចបន្តបានកើតឡើងពីការកសាងសហគមន៍ស្មោះស្ម័គ្រ មិនមែនការដេញតាមភាពរំជួលបណ្តោះអាសន្នឡើយ។
អ្វីដែលធ្វើឲ្យខ្ញុំចាប់អារម្មណ៍ខ្លាំងបំផុត គឺ DAO Labs មើលហួសពីការលក់ថូខិន និងលេខរាប់ខាងទីផ្សារ។ ដំណើរការវាយតម្លៃរបស់ពួកគេពិនិត្យថា តើគម្រោងមួយអាចទាក់ទាញអ្នកគាំទ្រពិតប្រាកដដែលជឿលើចក្ខុវិស័យ និងចូលរួមជំរុញភាពជោគជ័យរយៈពេលវែងរបស់វាបានឬទេ។
រឿងរ៉ាវជោគជ័យនៅក្នុងអត្ថបទបង្ហាញថា សហគមន៍រឹងមាំត្រូវបានកសាងលើទំនុកចិត្ត ភាពបើកចំហ និងការទទួលខុសត្រូវ។ ផ្ទុយទៅវិញ ករណីបរាជ័យបង្ហាញអំពីអ្វីដែលអាចកើតឡើង ពេលការប្ដេជ្ញាចិត្តត្រូវបានបំបែក ហើយការជឿជាក់របស់សហគមន៍ត្រូវបានបាត់បង់។
នេះហើយជាចំណុចដែល Social Mining Hubs លេចធ្លោ។ ពួកគេមិនមែនបង្កើតបរិយាកាសដែលពោរពេញដោយអ្នកតាមរក airdrop រយៈពេលខ្លីទេ ប៉ុន្តែជំរុញឲ្យមានការចូលរួមប្រកបដោយអត្ថន័យ ការកសាងទំនាក់ទំនង និងការរួមចំណែកជាប់លាប់។ ក្នុងរយៈពេលយូរ វាជួយបំលែងសមាជិកសហគមន៍ឲ្យទៅជាអ្នកគាំទ្រស្មោះស្ម័គ្រ និងអ្នកវិនិយោគដែលអាចមានរយៈពេលវែង។
សម្រាប់ខ្ញុំ មេរៀនធំបំផុតគឺសាមញ្ញ៖ គុណភាពសហគមន៍តែងតែសំខាន់ជាងទំហំសហគមន៍។ ក្រុមតូចមួយនៃអ្នកគាំទ្រដែលបានប្ដេជ្ញាចិត្ត អាចបង្កើតតម្លៃបានច្រើនជាងអ្នកតាមដានរាប់ពាន់នាក់ដែលមិនសកម្ម។
អានអត្ថបទពេញនៅទីនេះ៖ https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
តើអ្នកគិតថា អ្វីដែលសំខាន់ជាងសម្រាប់ភាពជោគជ័យរបស់គម្រោង Web3៖ សហគមន៍ធំ ឬសហគមន៍ស្មោះស្ម័គ្រ?
#DAOLabs #SocialMining #web3_binance #BinanceSquare
សហគមន៍ Web3 ភាគច្រើនជួបប្រទះបញ្ហាដូចគ្នា៖ ការទាក់ទាញមនុស្សដែលមកតែពេលមានរង្វាន់ ហើយចាកចេញពេលដែលការលើកទឹកចិត្តរលត់។
បន្ទាប់ពីខ្ញុំអានអត្ថបទរបស់ DAO Labs ស្តីពីការវាយតម្លៃគម្រោង Web3 មួយចំណុចបានច្បាស់លាស់ចំពោះខ្ញុំ៖ កំណើនដែលអាចបន្តបានកើតឡើងពីការកសាងសហគមន៍ស្មោះស្ម័គ្រ មិនមែនការដេញតាមភាពរំជួលបណ្តោះអាសន្នឡើយ។
អ្វីដែលធ្វើឲ្យខ្ញុំចាប់អារម្មណ៍ខ្លាំងបំផុត គឺ DAO Labs មើលហួសពីការលក់ថូខិន និងលេខរាប់ខាងទីផ្សារ។ ដំណើរការវាយតម្លៃរបស់ពួកគេពិនិត្យថា តើគម្រោងមួយអាចទាក់ទាញអ្នកគាំទ្រពិតប្រាកដដែលជឿលើចក្ខុវិស័យ និងចូលរួមជំរុញភាពជោគជ័យរយៈពេលវែងរបស់វាបានឬទេ។
រឿងរ៉ាវជោគជ័យនៅក្នុងអត្ថបទបង្ហាញថា សហគមន៍រឹងមាំត្រូវបានកសាងលើទំនុកចិត្ត ភាពបើកចំហ និងការទទួលខុសត្រូវ។ ផ្ទុយទៅវិញ ករណីបរាជ័យបង្ហាញអំពីអ្វីដែលអាចកើតឡើង ពេលការប្ដេជ្ញាចិត្តត្រូវបានបំបែក ហើយការជឿជាក់របស់សហគមន៍ត្រូវបានបាត់បង់។
នេះហើយជាចំណុចដែល Social Mining Hubs លេចធ្លោ។ ពួកគេមិនមែនបង្កើតបរិយាកាសដែលពោរពេញដោយអ្នកតាមរក airdrop រយៈពេលខ្លីទេ ប៉ុន្តែជំរុញឲ្យមានការចូលរួមប្រកបដោយអត្ថន័យ ការកសាងទំនាក់ទំនង និងការរួមចំណែកជាប់លាប់។ ក្នុងរយៈពេលយូរ វាជួយបំលែងសមាជិកសហគមន៍ឲ្យទៅជាអ្នកគាំទ្រស្មោះស្ម័គ្រ និងអ្នកវិនិយោគដែលអាចមានរយៈពេលវែង។
សម្រាប់ខ្ញុំ មេរៀនធំបំផុតគឺសាមញ្ញ៖ គុណភាពសហគមន៍តែងតែសំខាន់ជាងទំហំសហគមន៍។ ក្រុមតូចមួយនៃអ្នកគាំទ្រដែលបានប្ដេជ្ញាចិត្ត អាចបង្កើតតម្លៃបានច្រើនជាងអ្នកតាមដានរាប់ពាន់នាក់ដែលមិនសកម្ម។
អានអត្ថបទពេញនៅទីនេះ៖ https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
តើអ្នកគិតថា អ្វីដែលសំខាន់ជាងសម្រាប់ភាពជោគជ័យរបស់គម្រោង Web3៖ សហគមន៍ធំ ឬសហគមន៍ស្មោះស្ម័គ្រ?
#DAOLabs #SocialMining #web3_binance #BinanceSquare
បន្ទាប់ពីខ្ញុំអានអត្ថបទរបស់ DAO Labs ស្តីពីការវាយតម្លៃគម្រោង Web3 មួយចំណុចបានច្បាស់លាស់ចំពោះខ្ញុំ៖ កំណើនដែលអាចបន្តបានកើតឡើងពីការកសាងសហគមន៍ស្មោះស្ម័គ្រ មិនមែនការដេញតាមភាពរំជួលបណ្តោះអាសន្នឡើយ។
អ្វីដែលធ្វើឲ្យខ្ញុំចាប់អារម្មណ៍ខ្លាំងបំផុត គឺ DAO Labs មើលហួសពីការលក់ថូខិន និងលេខរាប់ខាងទីផ្សារ។ ដំណើរការវាយតម្លៃរបស់ពួកគេពិនិត្យថា តើគម្រោងមួយអាចទាក់ទាញអ្នកគាំទ្រពិតប្រាកដដែលជឿលើចក្ខុវិស័យ និងចូលរួមជំរុញភាពជោគជ័យរយៈពេលវែងរបស់វាបានឬទេ។
រឿងរ៉ាវជោគជ័យនៅក្នុងអត្ថបទបង្ហាញថា សហគមន៍រឹងមាំត្រូវបានកសាងលើទំនុកចិត្ត ភាពបើកចំហ និងការទទួលខុសត្រូវ។ ផ្ទុយទៅវិញ ករណីបរាជ័យបង្ហាញអំពីអ្វីដែលអាចកើតឡើង ពេលការប្ដេជ្ញាចិត្តត្រូវបានបំបែក ហើយការជឿជាក់របស់សហគមន៍ត្រូវបានបាត់បង់។
នេះហើយជាចំណុចដែល Social Mining Hubs លេចធ្លោ។ ពួកគេមិនមែនបង្កើតបរិយាកាសដែលពោរពេញដោយអ្នកតាមរក airdrop រយៈពេលខ្លីទេ ប៉ុន្តែជំរុញឲ្យមានការចូលរួមប្រកបដោយអត្ថន័យ ការកសាងទំនាក់ទំនង និងការរួមចំណែកជាប់លាប់។ ក្នុងរយៈពេលយូរ វាជួយបំលែងសមាជិកសហគមន៍ឲ្យទៅជាអ្នកគាំទ្រស្មោះស្ម័គ្រ និងអ្នកវិនិយោគដែលអាចមានរយៈពេលវែង។
សម្រាប់ខ្ញុំ មេរៀនធំបំផុតគឺសាមញ្ញ៖ គុណភាពសហគមន៍តែងតែសំខាន់ជាងទំហំសហគមន៍។ ក្រុមតូចមួយនៃអ្នកគាំទ្រដែលបានប្ដេជ្ញាចិត្ត អាចបង្កើតតម្លៃបានច្រើនជាងអ្នកតាមដានរាប់ពាន់នាក់ដែលមិនសកម្ម។
អានអត្ថបទពេញនៅទីនេះ៖ https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
តើអ្នកគិតថា អ្វីដែលសំខាន់ជាងសម្រាប់ភាពជោគជ័យរបស់គម្រោង Web3៖ សហគមន៍ធំ ឬសហគមន៍ស្មោះស្ម័គ្រ?
#DAOLabs #SocialMining #web3_binance #BinanceSquare
137
ເບິ່ງການແປ
THE HYPE UPGRADE
Social Mining is evolving, and that's something worth paying attention to.
From what i've seen so far, the upcoming updates are focused on making participation easier to track, validation more reliable, and rewards more aligned with real contributions. That's the kind of progress every genuine contributor wants to see.
My experience with #SocialMining has been encouraging. It has pushed me to create better content, stay consistent, and engage with purpose instead of chasing numbers. While there have been challenges along the way, I've seen continuous improvements that show the team is listening and building for the long term.
One thing I appreciate is the focus on validation. It helps recognize meaningful work while reducing the impact of low-effort engagement. That creates a healthier ecosystem where quality has a better chance to stand out.
If you're looking for a place where your creativity, consistency, and effort can turn into real opportunities, I'd recommend giving Social Mining a try. It's not about being the loudest,it's about creating value.
Excited to see what's next. Great things are clearly on the way.
@DAOLabs #DAOLabs
THE HYPE UPGRADE
Social Mining is evolving, and that's something worth paying attention to.
From what i've seen so far, the upcoming updates are focused on making participation easier to track, validation more reliable, and rewards more aligned with real contributions. That's the kind of progress every genuine contributor wants to see.
My experience with #SocialMining has been encouraging. It has pushed me to create better content, stay consistent, and engage with purpose instead of chasing numbers. While there have been challenges along the way, I've seen continuous improvements that show the team is listening and building for the long term.
One thing I appreciate is the focus on validation. It helps recognize meaningful work while reducing the impact of low-effort engagement. That creates a healthier ecosystem where quality has a better chance to stand out.
If you're looking for a place where your creativity, consistency, and effort can turn into real opportunities, I'd recommend giving Social Mining a try. It's not about being the loudest,it's about creating value.
Excited to see what's next. Great things are clearly on the way.
@DAO Labs #DAOLabs
Social Mining is evolving, and that's something worth paying attention to.
From what i've seen so far, the upcoming updates are focused on making participation easier to track, validation more reliable, and rewards more aligned with real contributions. That's the kind of progress every genuine contributor wants to see.
My experience with #SocialMining has been encouraging. It has pushed me to create better content, stay consistent, and engage with purpose instead of chasing numbers. While there have been challenges along the way, I've seen continuous improvements that show the team is listening and building for the long term.
One thing I appreciate is the focus on validation. It helps recognize meaningful work while reducing the impact of low-effort engagement. That creates a healthier ecosystem where quality has a better chance to stand out.
If you're looking for a place where your creativity, consistency, and effort can turn into real opportunities, I'd recommend giving Social Mining a try. It's not about being the loudest,it's about creating value.
Excited to see what's next. Great things are clearly on the way.
@DAO Labs #DAOLabs
1
84
·
--
ສັນຍານກະທິງ
Mòn lān nì mìén ká tèm “Proof of Work and Retainability in SocialFi: What Real Validation Looks Like (Part 1)” của DAO Labs, tì mòng̀a, ò tì bản mì ì nùn wàn pèn nình về những sự đóng góp trong SocialFi.
Điều cái mình rút ra lớn nhất là: việc hoạt động không phải là tạo ra giá trị. Nhiều người có thể hoàn thành các nhiệm vụ hàng ngày, như bài viết, bình luận hay chia sẻ, nhưng sự đóng góp thực sự đi sâu hơn nhiều so với chỉ việc đánh dấu hoàn thành các hoạt động.
Bài viết giải thích rõ sự khác nhau giữa proof of activity và proof of work. Proof of activity đo lường những gì bạn làm, còn proof of work đo lường giá trị và tác động thực sự của những gì bạn đóng góp. Sự khác biệt này rất quan trọng, vì cộng đồng thực sự phát triển nhờ những đóng góp có ý nghĩa, chứ không phải do các con số hoạt động được thổi phồng.
Với vai trò là một người tham gia Social Mining, mình nhận ra rằng những khoảnh khắc đáng giá nhất không chỉ là hoàn thành thêm một nhiệm vụ. Đó là khi nội dung của mình giáo dục ai đó, khơi dậy thảo luận, nhận được sự tương tác thực sự, hay giúp người khác hiểu rõ dự án hơn. Những tương tác này cho thấy công việc của mình đã tạo ra giá trị thực, chứ không chỉ đơn giản là thêm nội dung mới vào dòng thời gian.
Một khái niệm mình đặc biệt thích là khung thẩm định 3 giai đoạn của DAO Labs. Nó nhắc chúng ta rằng đóng góp cần được đánh giá dựa trên chất lượng, tính nguyên bản và tác động có thể đo lường, thay vì chỉ dựa trên hoạt động thô. Điều này tạo ra một hệ sinh thái lành mạnh hơn, nơi các người sáng tạo được khuyến khích suy nghĩ, nghiên cứu và đóng góp một cách chân thực thay vì đuổi theo con số.
Mình tin rằng đây là tương lai của SocialFi. Thẩm định bảo vệ cộng đồng khỏi spam, thưởng cho những người đóng góp chân thực, và xây dựng niềm tin giữa các dự án với những người hỗ trợ. Khi chất lượng trở thành tiêu chuẩn, ai cũng được lợi—nền tảng, cộng đồng và chính những người sáng tạo.
SocialFi không nên thưởng cho ai click nhiều nhất. Nó nên thưởng cho ai đóng góp nhiều giá trị ý nghĩa nhất.
Cảm ơn, @DAOLabs, vì đã chia sẻ quan điểm này.
#SocialMining #SocialFi #DAOLabs
Bài viết: https://dao-labs.com/posts/proof-of-work-and-retainability-in-socialfi-what-real-validation-looks-like-part-1
Mòn lān nì mìén ká tèm “Proof of Work and Retainability in SocialFi: What Real Validation Looks Like (Part 1)” của DAO Labs, tì mòng̀a, ò tì bản mì ì nùn wàn pèn nình về những sự đóng góp trong SocialFi.
Điều cái mình rút ra lớn nhất là: việc hoạt động không phải là tạo ra giá trị. Nhiều người có thể hoàn thành các nhiệm vụ hàng ngày, như bài viết, bình luận hay chia sẻ, nhưng sự đóng góp thực sự đi sâu hơn nhiều so với chỉ việc đánh dấu hoàn thành các hoạt động.
Bài viết giải thích rõ sự khác nhau giữa proof of activity và proof of work. Proof of activity đo lường những gì bạn làm, còn proof of work đo lường giá trị và tác động thực sự của những gì bạn đóng góp. Sự khác biệt này rất quan trọng, vì cộng đồng thực sự phát triển nhờ những đóng góp có ý nghĩa, chứ không phải do các con số hoạt động được thổi phồng.
Với vai trò là một người tham gia Social Mining, mình nhận ra rằng những khoảnh khắc đáng giá nhất không chỉ là hoàn thành thêm một nhiệm vụ. Đó là khi nội dung của mình giáo dục ai đó, khơi dậy thảo luận, nhận được sự tương tác thực sự, hay giúp người khác hiểu rõ dự án hơn. Những tương tác này cho thấy công việc của mình đã tạo ra giá trị thực, chứ không chỉ đơn giản là thêm nội dung mới vào dòng thời gian.
Một khái niệm mình đặc biệt thích là khung thẩm định 3 giai đoạn của DAO Labs. Nó nhắc chúng ta rằng đóng góp cần được đánh giá dựa trên chất lượng, tính nguyên bản và tác động có thể đo lường, thay vì chỉ dựa trên hoạt động thô. Điều này tạo ra một hệ sinh thái lành mạnh hơn, nơi các người sáng tạo được khuyến khích suy nghĩ, nghiên cứu và đóng góp một cách chân thực thay vì đuổi theo con số.
Mình tin rằng đây là tương lai của SocialFi. Thẩm định bảo vệ cộng đồng khỏi spam, thưởng cho những người đóng góp chân thực, và xây dựng niềm tin giữa các dự án với những người hỗ trợ. Khi chất lượng trở thành tiêu chuẩn, ai cũng được lợi—nền tảng, cộng đồng và chính những người sáng tạo.
SocialFi không nên thưởng cho ai click nhiều nhất. Nó nên thưởng cho ai đóng góp nhiều giá trị ý nghĩa nhất.
Cảm ơn, @DAOLabs, vì đã chia sẻ quan điểm này.
#SocialMining #SocialFi #DAOLabs
Bài viết: https://dao-labs.com/posts/proof-of-work-and-retainability-in-socialfi-what-real-validation-looks-like-part-1
Điều cái mình rút ra lớn nhất là: việc hoạt động không phải là tạo ra giá trị. Nhiều người có thể hoàn thành các nhiệm vụ hàng ngày, như bài viết, bình luận hay chia sẻ, nhưng sự đóng góp thực sự đi sâu hơn nhiều so với chỉ việc đánh dấu hoàn thành các hoạt động.
Bài viết giải thích rõ sự khác nhau giữa proof of activity và proof of work. Proof of activity đo lường những gì bạn làm, còn proof of work đo lường giá trị và tác động thực sự của những gì bạn đóng góp. Sự khác biệt này rất quan trọng, vì cộng đồng thực sự phát triển nhờ những đóng góp có ý nghĩa, chứ không phải do các con số hoạt động được thổi phồng.
Với vai trò là một người tham gia Social Mining, mình nhận ra rằng những khoảnh khắc đáng giá nhất không chỉ là hoàn thành thêm một nhiệm vụ. Đó là khi nội dung của mình giáo dục ai đó, khơi dậy thảo luận, nhận được sự tương tác thực sự, hay giúp người khác hiểu rõ dự án hơn. Những tương tác này cho thấy công việc của mình đã tạo ra giá trị thực, chứ không chỉ đơn giản là thêm nội dung mới vào dòng thời gian.
Một khái niệm mình đặc biệt thích là khung thẩm định 3 giai đoạn của DAO Labs. Nó nhắc chúng ta rằng đóng góp cần được đánh giá dựa trên chất lượng, tính nguyên bản và tác động có thể đo lường, thay vì chỉ dựa trên hoạt động thô. Điều này tạo ra một hệ sinh thái lành mạnh hơn, nơi các người sáng tạo được khuyến khích suy nghĩ, nghiên cứu và đóng góp một cách chân thực thay vì đuổi theo con số.
Mình tin rằng đây là tương lai của SocialFi. Thẩm định bảo vệ cộng đồng khỏi spam, thưởng cho những người đóng góp chân thực, và xây dựng niềm tin giữa các dự án với những người hỗ trợ. Khi chất lượng trở thành tiêu chuẩn, ai cũng được lợi—nền tảng, cộng đồng và chính những người sáng tạo.
SocialFi không nên thưởng cho ai click nhiều nhất. Nó nên thưởng cho ai đóng góp nhiều giá trị ý nghĩa nhất.
Cảm ơn, @DAOLabs, vì đã chia sẻ quan điểm này.
#SocialMining #SocialFi #DAOLabs
Bài viết: https://dao-labs.com/posts/proof-of-work-and-retainability-in-socialfi-what-real-validation-looks-like-part-1
1
1
91
ເບິ່ງການແປ
Social Mining is evolving, and the move to WhoTweets marks an important milestone. @DAOLabs
The platform now offers a cleaner dashboard, smarter task management, and improved campaign discovery, making it easier for contributors to participate and discover rewarding opportunities.
What I like most is that the upgrade isn't just about a new domain—it's focused on improving the overall user experience while preserving contributors' progress and rewards.
Quality participation is becoming more accessible, and that's a positive direction for the Web3 creator economy.
#WhoTweets #SocialMining g #DAOLabs s #BinanceSquare re #Web3
Social Mining is evolving, and the move to WhoTweets marks an important milestone. @DAO Labs
The platform now offers a cleaner dashboard, smarter task management, and improved campaign discovery, making it easier for contributors to participate and discover rewarding opportunities.
What I like most is that the upgrade isn't just about a new domain—it's focused on improving the overall user experience while preserving contributors' progress and rewards.
Quality participation is becoming more accessible, and that's a positive direction for the Web3 creator economy.
#WhoTweets #SocialMining g #DAOLabs s #BinanceSquare re #Web3
The platform now offers a cleaner dashboard, smarter task management, and improved campaign discovery, making it easier for contributors to participate and discover rewarding opportunities.
What I like most is that the upgrade isn't just about a new domain—it's focused on improving the overall user experience while preserving contributors' progress and rewards.
Quality participation is becoming more accessible, and that's a positive direction for the Web3 creator economy.
#WhoTweets #SocialMining g #DAOLabs s #BinanceSquare re #Web3
261
·
--
Nakon čitanja najnovijeg članka DAO Labs-a, jedna poruka se posebno izdvojila:
Ne zaslužuje svaki projekt povjerenje zajednice.
Ono što DAO Labs čini drugačijim jest to što se ne zaustavljaju na onboardingu—oni kontinuirano procjenjuju projekte. Slučaj u kojem je projekt prekršio svoj dogovor pokazuje da je odgovornost jednako važna kao i rast.
Meni je najveći ključni zaključak jednostavan:
Zajednica izgrađena na stvarnim suradnicima uvijek će nadmašiti onu izgrađenu na uzbuđenju i hype-u.
Tako se stvaraju dugoročni ulagači umjesto lovaca na kratkoročne airdropove.
https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
#DAOLabs #SocialMining
Nakon čitanja najnovijeg članka DAO Labs-a, jedna poruka se posebno izdvojila:
Ne zaslužuje svaki projekt povjerenje zajednice.
Ono što DAO Labs čini drugačijim jest to što se ne zaustavljaju na onboardingu—oni kontinuirano procjenjuju projekte. Slučaj u kojem je projekt prekršio svoj dogovor pokazuje da je odgovornost jednako važna kao i rast.
Meni je najveći ključni zaključak jednostavan:
Zajednica izgrađena na stvarnim suradnicima uvijek će nadmašiti onu izgrađenu na uzbuđenju i hype-u.
Tako se stvaraju dugoročni ulagači umjesto lovaca na kratkoročne airdropove.
https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
#DAOLabs #SocialMining
Ne zaslužuje svaki projekt povjerenje zajednice.
Ono što DAO Labs čini drugačijim jest to što se ne zaustavljaju na onboardingu—oni kontinuirano procjenjuju projekte. Slučaj u kojem je projekt prekršio svoj dogovor pokazuje da je odgovornost jednako važna kao i rast.
Meni je najveći ključni zaključak jednostavan:
Zajednica izgrađena na stvarnim suradnicima uvijek će nadmašiti onu izgrađenu na uzbuđenju i hype-u.
Tako se stvaraju dugoročni ulagači umjesto lovaca na kratkoročne airdropove.
https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
#DAOLabs #SocialMining
1
84
·
--
ບົດຄວາມ
Bakit Mahalaga ang Masusing Pagsusuri: Mga Aral mula sa 4 na Successes & 1 Failure ng DAO LabsPagkatapos basahin ang pinakabagong artikulo ng DAO Labs na “4 Successes, 1 Failure,” naaalala ko kung bakit kakaiba ang kanilang paraan sa pagpili ng proyekto sa Web3.
Umatasa “Detective” Matrix na nakakabilib—hindi lang nila hinahabol ang hype. Sinusuri nila ang valuation, token allocation, vesting schedules, at ang pagsunod sa kontrata bago i-onboard ang anumang proyekto.
Ipinapakita ng 4 na success stories (NEM/Symbol, MultiversX, Avalanche, RWA-inc) kung ano ang nangyayari kapag sinusunod ang mga pamantayan ng fair launch: malalakas na komunidad at sustainable na paglago.
Bakit Mahalaga ang Masusing Pagsusuri: Mga Aral mula sa 4 na Successes & 1 Failure ng DAO Labs
Pagkatapos basahin ang pinakabagong artikulo ng DAO Labs na “4 Successes, 1 Failure,” naaalala ko kung bakit kakaiba ang kanilang paraan sa pagpili ng proyekto sa Web3.
Umatasa “Detective” Matrix na nakakabilib—hindi lang nila hinahabol ang hype. Sinusuri nila ang valuation, token allocation, vesting schedules, at ang pagsunod sa kontrata bago i-onboard ang anumang proyekto.
Ipinapakita ng 4 na success stories (NEM/Symbol, MultiversX, Avalanche, RWA-inc) kung ano ang nangyayari kapag sinusunod ang mga pamantayan ng fair launch: malalakas na komunidad at sustainable na paglago.
Umatasa “Detective” Matrix na nakakabilib—hindi lang nila hinahabol ang hype. Sinusuri nila ang valuation, token allocation, vesting schedules, at ang pagsunod sa kontrata bago i-onboard ang anumang proyekto.
Ipinapakita ng 4 na success stories (NEM/Symbol, MultiversX, Avalanche, RWA-inc) kung ano ang nangyayari kapag sinusunod ang mga pamantayan ng fair launch: malalakas na komunidad at sustainable na paglago.
135
·
--
ບໍ່ທຸກໆໂຄງການຈະສົມຄວນໄວ້ໃຈຂອງເຈົ້າ ແລະຖ້າເຈົ້າໄດ້ໃຊ້ເວລາຢູ່ໃນ Web3, ເຈົ້າກໍ່ຮູ້ຢູ່ແລ້ວວ່າການເຊື່ອແບບມືດໆນັ້ນມີຄ່າໃຊ້ຈ່າຍສູງປານໃດ.
ພວກເຮົາທຸກຄົນກໍ່ໄດ້ເຫັນວົງຈອນດຽວກັນເກີດຂຶ້ນ: ຄວາມຮ້ອນແຮງຂອງ hype, ສັນຍາທີ່ກ້າຫານ, ຊຸມຊົນດັງສະໜັ່ນ ແລ້ວທຸກຢ່າງກໍ່ຈືດຈາງໄປ. ນັ້ນແມ່ນເຫດຜົນທີ່ການແຍກ @DAOLabs ນີ້ຈຶ່ງໂດດເດັ່ນ. ມັນບໍ່ພຽງແຕ່ຊີ້ໃຫ້ເຫັນຜົນສຳເລັດ ແຕ່ຍັງເປີດເຜີຍຂັ້ນຕອນຂະບວນການໃນການເລືອກໂຄງການທີ່ຖືກຕ້ອງ ແລະກັ່ນຕອງໂຄງການທີ່ຜິດ.
ໂຄງສ້າງ Fair Launchpad ເປັນສິ່ງທຳອິດທີ່ດຶງຄວາມສົນໃຈຂອງຂ້ອຍ. ນີ້ບໍ່ແມ່ນເລັ່ງລົບການລົງລາຍການ. ໂຄງການທຸກອັນຖືກຜ່ານການປະເມີນແບບເປັນລະບົບ ຕັ້ງແຕ່ຄວາມນ່າເຊື່ອຖືຂອງທີມ ແລະ tokenomics ໄປຈົນເຖິງຄວາມປອດໄພຂອງ smart contract ແລະຄວາມແທ້ຈິງຂອງຊຸມຊົນ. ບໍ່ແມ່ນພຽງແຕ່ຕົວເລກທີ່ຖືກເພີ່ມຢ່າງເກີນຈິງ ແຕ່ເປັນການມີຄວາມກຳລັງຂອງການມີສ່ວນຮ່ວມແທ້. ແຕ່ພຽງຂໍ້ນີ້ກໍ່ສາມາດກຳຈັດໂຄງການທີ່ມີຄຸນນະພາບຕ່ຳຈຳນວນໃຫຍ່ ກ່ອນທີ່ມັນຈະໄປຮອດຜູ້ໃຊ້.
ແລ້ວກໍ່ມາຮອດສ່ວນທີ່ສຳຄັນຈິງໆ ກໍຄື violation case.
ໂຄງການທີ່ໄດ້ຮັບ onboarded ໜຶ່ງບໍ່ໄດ້ຮັກສາຄຳສັນຍາຫຼັງຈາກໄດ້ຮັບການເຂົ້າເຖິງ. ບໍ່ແມ່ນເພີ່ມການລະເລີຍ, DAO Labs ໄດ້ເຂົ້າມາ ແລະດຳເນີນການ. ລະດັບຄວາມຮັບຜິດຊອບແບບນີ້ແມ່ນຫາຍາກ. ໃນພື້ນທີ່ທີ່ຫຼາຍໆແພລດຟອມປົກປ້ອງໂຄງການ, #DAOLabs ເລືອກທີ່ຈະປົກປ້ອງຊຸມຊົນ. ການຕັດສິນໃຈນັ້ນສ້າງຄວາມເຊື່ອໃຈແທ້.
ເມື່ອທຽບກັບ launchpads ແບບດັ້ງເດີມ, ຄວາມແຕກຕ່າງຊັດເຈນ. ສ່ວນໃຫຍ່ເຄື່ອນໄວ, ໄລ່ຕາມແນວໂນ້ມ, ແລະເນັ້ນຜົນກຳໄລໃນໄລຍະສັ້ນ. @DAOLabs ມີທາງເລືອກທີ່ມຸ່ງໝັ້ນກວ່າ ໂດຍຈັດລຳດັບຄວາມຍືນຍົງ, ຄວາມສອດຄ່ອງ, ແລະມູນຄ່າໃນລະຍະຍາວ ເຫນືອກວ່າຮອດ hype ໄວໆ.
ອີກຂໍ້ເອົາປະໂຫຍດທີ່ແຂງແຮງຄື ວິທີການ #SocialMining Hubs ຊ່ວຍປັ່ນຊຸມຊົນໃຫ້ດີຂຶ້ນ. ບໍ່ແມ່ນແຈກຈ່າຍລາງວັນໃຫ້ spam ແຕ່ເຂົາຈະໃຫ້ລາງວັນແກ່ການມີສ່ວນຮ່ວມທີ່ມີຄຸນຄ່າ. ຄົນຖືກຊວນໃຫ້ຮຽນຮູ້, ເຂົ້າຮ່ວມ, ແລະເພີ່ມມູນຄ່າ ເຮັດໃຫ້ໄດ້ຜູ້ສະໜັບສະໜູນທີ່ຊື່ສັດ ບໍ່ແມ່ນແຕ່ເຮັດເພື່ອລ່າລາງວັນ.
ສຳລັບຂ້ອຍ, ມັນກໍ່ຂຶ້ນກັບແນວນີ້: ຄຸນນະພາບຂອງຊຸມຊົນດີກວ່າຂະໜາດຂອງຊຸມຊົນ.
ຊຸມຊົນທີ່ນ້ອຍກວ່າ ແຕ່ມີຄວາມຮູ້ພ້ອມ ຈະຊະນະຢູ່ເສມອຽງແຫຼະ ຕໍ່ຊຸມຊົນຂະໜາດໃຫຍ່ທີ່ບໍ່ກ່ຽວຂ້ອງ.
ທ້າຍທີ່ສຸດ, @DAOLabs ບໍ່ພຽງແຕ່ກັ່ນຕອງໂຄງການ—ມັນກຳລັງຍົກມາດຕະຖານຄວາມເຊື່ອໃຈໃນ Web3.
🔗 ອ່ານເພີ່ມເຕີມ: https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
ບໍ່ທຸກໆໂຄງການຈະສົມຄວນໄວ້ໃຈຂອງເຈົ້າ ແລະຖ້າເຈົ້າໄດ້ໃຊ້ເວລາຢູ່ໃນ Web3, ເຈົ້າກໍ່ຮູ້ຢູ່ແລ້ວວ່າການເຊື່ອແບບມືດໆນັ້ນມີຄ່າໃຊ້ຈ່າຍສູງປານໃດ.
ພວກເຮົາທຸກຄົນກໍ່ໄດ້ເຫັນວົງຈອນດຽວກັນເກີດຂຶ້ນ: ຄວາມຮ້ອນແຮງຂອງ hype, ສັນຍາທີ່ກ້າຫານ, ຊຸມຊົນດັງສະໜັ່ນ ແລ້ວທຸກຢ່າງກໍ່ຈືດຈາງໄປ. ນັ້ນແມ່ນເຫດຜົນທີ່ການແຍກ @DAO Labs ນີ້ຈຶ່ງໂດດເດັ່ນ. ມັນບໍ່ພຽງແຕ່ຊີ້ໃຫ້ເຫັນຜົນສຳເລັດ ແຕ່ຍັງເປີດເຜີຍຂັ້ນຕອນຂະບວນການໃນການເລືອກໂຄງການທີ່ຖືກຕ້ອງ ແລະກັ່ນຕອງໂຄງການທີ່ຜິດ.
ໂຄງສ້າງ Fair Launchpad ເປັນສິ່ງທຳອິດທີ່ດຶງຄວາມສົນໃຈຂອງຂ້ອຍ. ນີ້ບໍ່ແມ່ນເລັ່ງລົບການລົງລາຍການ. ໂຄງການທຸກອັນຖືກຜ່ານການປະເມີນແບບເປັນລະບົບ ຕັ້ງແຕ່ຄວາມນ່າເຊື່ອຖືຂອງທີມ ແລະ tokenomics ໄປຈົນເຖິງຄວາມປອດໄພຂອງ smart contract ແລະຄວາມແທ້ຈິງຂອງຊຸມຊົນ. ບໍ່ແມ່ນພຽງແຕ່ຕົວເລກທີ່ຖືກເພີ່ມຢ່າງເກີນຈິງ ແຕ່ເປັນການມີຄວາມກຳລັງຂອງການມີສ່ວນຮ່ວມແທ້. ແຕ່ພຽງຂໍ້ນີ້ກໍ່ສາມາດກຳຈັດໂຄງການທີ່ມີຄຸນນະພາບຕ່ຳຈຳນວນໃຫຍ່ ກ່ອນທີ່ມັນຈະໄປຮອດຜູ້ໃຊ້.
ແລ້ວກໍ່ມາຮອດສ່ວນທີ່ສຳຄັນຈິງໆ ກໍຄື violation case.
ໂຄງການທີ່ໄດ້ຮັບ onboarded ໜຶ່ງບໍ່ໄດ້ຮັກສາຄຳສັນຍາຫຼັງຈາກໄດ້ຮັບການເຂົ້າເຖິງ. ບໍ່ແມ່ນເພີ່ມການລະເລີຍ, DAO Labs ໄດ້ເຂົ້າມາ ແລະດຳເນີນການ. ລະດັບຄວາມຮັບຜິດຊອບແບບນີ້ແມ່ນຫາຍາກ. ໃນພື້ນທີ່ທີ່ຫຼາຍໆແພລດຟອມປົກປ້ອງໂຄງການ, #DAOLabs ເລືອກທີ່ຈະປົກປ້ອງຊຸມຊົນ. ການຕັດສິນໃຈນັ້ນສ້າງຄວາມເຊື່ອໃຈແທ້.
ເມື່ອທຽບກັບ launchpads ແບບດັ້ງເດີມ, ຄວາມແຕກຕ່າງຊັດເຈນ. ສ່ວນໃຫຍ່ເຄື່ອນໄວ, ໄລ່ຕາມແນວໂນ້ມ, ແລະເນັ້ນຜົນກຳໄລໃນໄລຍະສັ້ນ. @DAO Labs ມີທາງເລືອກທີ່ມຸ່ງໝັ້ນກວ່າ ໂດຍຈັດລຳດັບຄວາມຍືນຍົງ, ຄວາມສອດຄ່ອງ, ແລະມູນຄ່າໃນລະຍະຍາວ ເຫນືອກວ່າຮອດ hype ໄວໆ.
ອີກຂໍ້ເອົາປະໂຫຍດທີ່ແຂງແຮງຄື ວິທີການ #SocialMining Hubs ຊ່ວຍປັ່ນຊຸມຊົນໃຫ້ດີຂຶ້ນ. ບໍ່ແມ່ນແຈກຈ່າຍລາງວັນໃຫ້ spam ແຕ່ເຂົາຈະໃຫ້ລາງວັນແກ່ການມີສ່ວນຮ່ວມທີ່ມີຄຸນຄ່າ. ຄົນຖືກຊວນໃຫ້ຮຽນຮູ້, ເຂົ້າຮ່ວມ, ແລະເພີ່ມມູນຄ່າ ເຮັດໃຫ້ໄດ້ຜູ້ສະໜັບສະໜູນທີ່ຊື່ສັດ ບໍ່ແມ່ນແຕ່ເຮັດເພື່ອລ່າລາງວັນ.
ສຳລັບຂ້ອຍ, ມັນກໍ່ຂຶ້ນກັບແນວນີ້: ຄຸນນະພາບຂອງຊຸມຊົນດີກວ່າຂະໜາດຂອງຊຸມຊົນ.
ຊຸມຊົນທີ່ນ້ອຍກວ່າ ແຕ່ມີຄວາມຮູ້ພ້ອມ ຈະຊະນະຢູ່ເສມອຽງແຫຼະ ຕໍ່ຊຸມຊົນຂະໜາດໃຫຍ່ທີ່ບໍ່ກ່ຽວຂ້ອງ.
ທ້າຍທີ່ສຸດ, @DAO Labs ບໍ່ພຽງແຕ່ກັ່ນຕອງໂຄງການ—ມັນກຳລັງຍົກມາດຕະຖານຄວາມເຊື່ອໃຈໃນ Web3.
🔗 ອ່ານເພີ່ມເຕີມ: https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
ພວກເຮົາທຸກຄົນກໍ່ໄດ້ເຫັນວົງຈອນດຽວກັນເກີດຂຶ້ນ: ຄວາມຮ້ອນແຮງຂອງ hype, ສັນຍາທີ່ກ້າຫານ, ຊຸມຊົນດັງສະໜັ່ນ ແລ້ວທຸກຢ່າງກໍ່ຈືດຈາງໄປ. ນັ້ນແມ່ນເຫດຜົນທີ່ການແຍກ @DAO Labs ນີ້ຈຶ່ງໂດດເດັ່ນ. ມັນບໍ່ພຽງແຕ່ຊີ້ໃຫ້ເຫັນຜົນສຳເລັດ ແຕ່ຍັງເປີດເຜີຍຂັ້ນຕອນຂະບວນການໃນການເລືອກໂຄງການທີ່ຖືກຕ້ອງ ແລະກັ່ນຕອງໂຄງການທີ່ຜິດ.
ໂຄງສ້າງ Fair Launchpad ເປັນສິ່ງທຳອິດທີ່ດຶງຄວາມສົນໃຈຂອງຂ້ອຍ. ນີ້ບໍ່ແມ່ນເລັ່ງລົບການລົງລາຍການ. ໂຄງການທຸກອັນຖືກຜ່ານການປະເມີນແບບເປັນລະບົບ ຕັ້ງແຕ່ຄວາມນ່າເຊື່ອຖືຂອງທີມ ແລະ tokenomics ໄປຈົນເຖິງຄວາມປອດໄພຂອງ smart contract ແລະຄວາມແທ້ຈິງຂອງຊຸມຊົນ. ບໍ່ແມ່ນພຽງແຕ່ຕົວເລກທີ່ຖືກເພີ່ມຢ່າງເກີນຈິງ ແຕ່ເປັນການມີຄວາມກຳລັງຂອງການມີສ່ວນຮ່ວມແທ້. ແຕ່ພຽງຂໍ້ນີ້ກໍ່ສາມາດກຳຈັດໂຄງການທີ່ມີຄຸນນະພາບຕ່ຳຈຳນວນໃຫຍ່ ກ່ອນທີ່ມັນຈະໄປຮອດຜູ້ໃຊ້.
ແລ້ວກໍ່ມາຮອດສ່ວນທີ່ສຳຄັນຈິງໆ ກໍຄື violation case.
ໂຄງການທີ່ໄດ້ຮັບ onboarded ໜຶ່ງບໍ່ໄດ້ຮັກສາຄຳສັນຍາຫຼັງຈາກໄດ້ຮັບການເຂົ້າເຖິງ. ບໍ່ແມ່ນເພີ່ມການລະເລີຍ, DAO Labs ໄດ້ເຂົ້າມາ ແລະດຳເນີນການ. ລະດັບຄວາມຮັບຜິດຊອບແບບນີ້ແມ່ນຫາຍາກ. ໃນພື້ນທີ່ທີ່ຫຼາຍໆແພລດຟອມປົກປ້ອງໂຄງການ, #DAOLabs ເລືອກທີ່ຈະປົກປ້ອງຊຸມຊົນ. ການຕັດສິນໃຈນັ້ນສ້າງຄວາມເຊື່ອໃຈແທ້.
ເມື່ອທຽບກັບ launchpads ແບບດັ້ງເດີມ, ຄວາມແຕກຕ່າງຊັດເຈນ. ສ່ວນໃຫຍ່ເຄື່ອນໄວ, ໄລ່ຕາມແນວໂນ້ມ, ແລະເນັ້ນຜົນກຳໄລໃນໄລຍະສັ້ນ. @DAO Labs ມີທາງເລືອກທີ່ມຸ່ງໝັ້ນກວ່າ ໂດຍຈັດລຳດັບຄວາມຍືນຍົງ, ຄວາມສອດຄ່ອງ, ແລະມູນຄ່າໃນລະຍະຍາວ ເຫນືອກວ່າຮອດ hype ໄວໆ.
ອີກຂໍ້ເອົາປະໂຫຍດທີ່ແຂງແຮງຄື ວິທີການ #SocialMining Hubs ຊ່ວຍປັ່ນຊຸມຊົນໃຫ້ດີຂຶ້ນ. ບໍ່ແມ່ນແຈກຈ່າຍລາງວັນໃຫ້ spam ແຕ່ເຂົາຈະໃຫ້ລາງວັນແກ່ການມີສ່ວນຮ່ວມທີ່ມີຄຸນຄ່າ. ຄົນຖືກຊວນໃຫ້ຮຽນຮູ້, ເຂົ້າຮ່ວມ, ແລະເພີ່ມມູນຄ່າ ເຮັດໃຫ້ໄດ້ຜູ້ສະໜັບສະໜູນທີ່ຊື່ສັດ ບໍ່ແມ່ນແຕ່ເຮັດເພື່ອລ່າລາງວັນ.
ສຳລັບຂ້ອຍ, ມັນກໍ່ຂຶ້ນກັບແນວນີ້: ຄຸນນະພາບຂອງຊຸມຊົນດີກວ່າຂະໜາດຂອງຊຸມຊົນ.
ຊຸມຊົນທີ່ນ້ອຍກວ່າ ແຕ່ມີຄວາມຮູ້ພ້ອມ ຈະຊະນະຢູ່ເສມອຽງແຫຼະ ຕໍ່ຊຸມຊົນຂະໜາດໃຫຍ່ທີ່ບໍ່ກ່ຽວຂ້ອງ.
ທ້າຍທີ່ສຸດ, @DAO Labs ບໍ່ພຽງແຕ່ກັ່ນຕອງໂຄງການ—ມັນກຳລັງຍົກມາດຕະຖານຄວາມເຊື່ອໃຈໃນ Web3.
🔗 ອ່ານເພີ່ມເຕີມ: https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
1
1
3
89
ເປັນຄວາມຈິງບາງສ່ວນ
ເບິ່ງການແປ
I just finished reading #DAOLabs breakdown of how they evaluate Web3 projects before bringing them into Social Mining, and one thing stood out immediately:
Trust isn't assumed. It's verified.
While many platforms focus on fundraising numbers and marketing hype, #DAOLabs looks deeper. They examine tokenomics, vesting schedules, team accountability, community sustainability, and whether a project can actually deliver on its promises.
The article highlights four projects that successfully passed this process: NEM, MultiversX, Avalanche, and RWA. Each one demonstrated transparency, commitment, and long-term vision. They didn't just build attention; they built communities.
What impressed me most was the project that failed.
Autonomys violated its token distribution agreement, and DAOLabs enforced the consequences. No exceptions. No excuses. In an industry where rules are often ignored when money is involved, that level of accountability is rare.
The biggest takeaway for me is that Social Mining works best when it's built around trust. Communities become stronger when contributors understand the project they're supporting instead of simply chasing rewards.
This article is a reminder that sustainable growth starts with proper evaluation. The projects that last are usually the ones willing to be transparent from day one.
Worth reading if you're serious about Web3, community building, and long-term value.👇
https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
#DAOLabs #SocialMining
I just finished reading #DAOLabs breakdown of how they evaluate Web3 projects before bringing them into Social Mining, and one thing stood out immediately:
Trust isn't assumed. It's verified.
While many platforms focus on fundraising numbers and marketing hype, #DAOLabs looks deeper. They examine tokenomics, vesting schedules, team accountability, community sustainability, and whether a project can actually deliver on its promises.
The article highlights four projects that successfully passed this process: NEM, MultiversX, Avalanche, and RWA. Each one demonstrated transparency, commitment, and long-term vision. They didn't just build attention; they built communities.
What impressed me most was the project that failed.
Autonomys violated its token distribution agreement, and DAOLabs enforced the consequences. No exceptions. No excuses. In an industry where rules are often ignored when money is involved, that level of accountability is rare.
The biggest takeaway for me is that Social Mining works best when it's built around trust. Communities become stronger when contributors understand the project they're supporting instead of simply chasing rewards.
This article is a reminder that sustainable growth starts with proper evaluation. The projects that last are usually the ones willing to be transparent from day one.
Worth reading if you're serious about Web3, community building, and long-term value.👇
https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
#DAOLabs #SocialMining
Trust isn't assumed. It's verified.
While many platforms focus on fundraising numbers and marketing hype, #DAOLabs looks deeper. They examine tokenomics, vesting schedules, team accountability, community sustainability, and whether a project can actually deliver on its promises.
The article highlights four projects that successfully passed this process: NEM, MultiversX, Avalanche, and RWA. Each one demonstrated transparency, commitment, and long-term vision. They didn't just build attention; they built communities.
What impressed me most was the project that failed.
Autonomys violated its token distribution agreement, and DAOLabs enforced the consequences. No exceptions. No excuses. In an industry where rules are often ignored when money is involved, that level of accountability is rare.
The biggest takeaway for me is that Social Mining works best when it's built around trust. Communities become stronger when contributors understand the project they're supporting instead of simply chasing rewards.
This article is a reminder that sustainable growth starts with proper evaluation. The projects that last are usually the ones willing to be transparent from day one.
Worth reading if you're serious about Web3, community building, and long-term value.👇
https://dao-labs.com/posts/4-successes-1-failure-lessons-from-evaluating-web3-projects
#DAOLabs #SocialMining
2
1
158
ເຂົ້າສູ່ລະບົບເພື່ອສຳຫຼວດເນື້ອຫາເພີ່ມເຕີມ
ເຂົ້າຮ່ວມກຸ່ມຜູ້ໃຊ້ຄຣິບໂຕທົ່ວໂລກໃນ Binance Square.
⚡️ ໄດ້ຮັບຂໍ້ມູນຫຼ້າສຸດ ແລະ ທີ່ມີປະໂຫຍດກ່ຽວກັບຄຣິບໂຕ.
💬 ໄດ້ຮັບຄວາມໄວ້ວາງໃຈຈາກຕະຫຼາດແລກປ່ຽນຄຣິບໂຕທີ່ໃຫຍ່ທີ່ສຸດໃນໂລກ.
👍 ຄົ້ນຫາຂໍ້ມູນເຊີງເລິກທີ່ແທ້ຈາກນັກສ້າງທີ່ໄດ້ຮັບການຢືນຢັນ.
ອີເມວ / ເບີໂທລະສັບ
ຫົວຂໍ້ທີ່ກໍາລັງນິຍົມ
1
#AppleDebutsFoldablePhone
36,173 views
764 ກຳລັງສົນທະນາ
2
#TSMCAugustRevenueUp53.3%YoY
5,743 views
207 ກຳລັງສົນທະນາ
3
#IranSaysReadyToEscalateWarWithUS
9,189 views
228 ກຳລັງສົນທະນາ
4
#EUExtendsCentralContactPointToCASPs
11,043 views
295 ກຳລັງສົນທະນາ
5
#US10YTreasuryYieldHitsHighestSinceNov2023
32,706 views
520 ກຳລັງສົນທະນາ
6
#USTreasuryToBuyBackUpTo$6BLongDatedDebt
19,689 views
178 ກຳລັງສົນທະນາ
7
#BitcoinSurpasses$79K
70,602 views
289 ກຳລັງສົນທະນາ
8
#BrentCrudeTops$100
130,021 views
413 ກຳລັງສົນທະນາ
9
#USADPWeeklyEmploymentRises12000
119,059 views
1,418 ກຳລັງສົນທະນາ
10
#BankOfAmericaGroupPilotsUSBDCStablecoin
89,376 views
1,117 ກຳລັງສົນທະນາ