Binance Square

TheCryptoDegen

Dare to Fly Higher :Blockchain & Digital Asset Management -Bitcoin Fixing World -Shedding Light on Blockchain,Bitcoin & Crypto Currency Trader 24/7
Кездейсоқ трейдер
4.6 жыл
8 Жазылым
2.2K+ Жазылушылар
1.0K+ лайк басылған
62 Бөлісу
Жазбалар
PINNED
·
--
Most people don’t know this, but Bitcoin has a hidden message that can never be deleted Bitcoin block 666,666 was mined on January 18, 2021 It contains a message permanently written into the blockchain Using Bitcoin’s OP_RETURN, the miner embedded a Bible verse directly into the block’s data “Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.” Romans 12:21 To make it happen, they paid over 5x the normal fee just to guarantee inclusion in that exact block The transaction is linked to wallets named “GoD” and “BibLE”, verifiable on any public block explorer Once it’s there, it can never be removed
Most people don’t know this, but Bitcoin has a hidden message that can never be deleted

Bitcoin block 666,666 was mined on January 18, 2021

It contains a message permanently written into the blockchain

Using Bitcoin’s OP_RETURN, the miner embedded a Bible verse directly into the block’s data

“Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.” Romans 12:21

To make it happen, they paid over 5x the normal fee just to guarantee inclusion in that exact block

The transaction is linked to wallets named “GoD” and “BibLE”, verifiable on any public block explorer

Once it’s there, it can never be removed
VERY IMPORTANT ; BTC BEARISH BOTTOM CYCLEVERY IMPORTANT A lot of people seem uneasy right now because Bitcoin has dropped below Strategy’s average entry price. That average sits around $76,000. So I’m posting this while rubbing the sleep out of my eyes, hoping it can at least offer a bit of emotional support. What follows is highly logical. First of all, in moments like this, it’s worth thinking through the worst-case scenario. Once you genuinely accept the worst case, nothing worse can really happen. That alone helps neutralize the market’s biggest enemy: Impatience and it keeps panic at bay. So let’s look at a worstcase scenario that hasn’t actually happened yet. A chain reaction of treasury companies going bankrupt. Up to now, these companies have been accumulating Bitcoin under pressure, issuing new shares, often at a discount, to raise capital. Once the average purchase price drops by around 30%, insolvency risk starts to rise meaningfully. At that point, forced selling becomes unavoidable. That said, if a small treasury company fails, the market impact is limited. This is where Strategy matters as an indicator. It’s the world’s largest treasury company by far. Its average Bitcoin purchase price is around $76,000, and it holds roughly 713,500 BTC. A 30% drop from $76,000 puts us at about $53,000. I don’t think it gets anywhere near that level. Why? Because of a historical anomaly that has held throughout Bitcoin’s entire history, something I’ve mentioned many times. The high before a halving has never fallen below the low after the halving. There was only one brief exception, and that exception turned out to be the absolute buying opportunity. That “once-in-a-generation” opportunity is still fresh in everyone’s mind: the second half of 2022, around $10,000. This cycle, that line sits at roughly $69,000. Based on that historical pattern, it’s reasonable to assume that Strategy’s average purchase price will not be meaningfully breached. Of course, if they keep buying, the average price changes, so the numbers always need to be monitored. But at this stage, you can sketch out a scenario in which the world’s largest treasury company survives. If that happens, the probability increases that the global accumulation culture remains deeply intact. To be clear, this is framed purely as a worst-case scenario. And as I often say. Once you’ve accepted the worst case, nothing worse tends to happen and the market’s greatest enemy, impatience, loses its power.

VERY IMPORTANT ; BTC BEARISH BOTTOM CYCLE

VERY IMPORTANT
A lot of people seem uneasy right now because Bitcoin has dropped below Strategy’s average entry price. That average sits around $76,000.
So I’m posting this while rubbing the sleep out of my eyes, hoping it can at least offer a bit of emotional support.
What follows is highly logical.
First of all, in moments like this, it’s worth thinking through the worst-case scenario.
Once you genuinely accept the worst case, nothing worse can really happen. That alone helps neutralize the market’s biggest enemy: Impatience and it keeps panic at bay.
So let’s look at a worstcase scenario that hasn’t actually happened yet. A chain reaction of treasury companies going bankrupt.
Up to now, these companies have been accumulating Bitcoin under pressure, issuing new shares, often at a discount, to raise capital.
Once the average purchase price drops by around 30%, insolvency risk starts to rise meaningfully. At that point, forced selling becomes unavoidable.
That said, if a small treasury company fails, the market impact is limited.
This is where Strategy matters as an indicator. It’s the world’s largest treasury company by far.
Its average Bitcoin purchase price is around $76,000, and it holds roughly 713,500 BTC.
A 30% drop from $76,000 puts us at about $53,000.
I don’t think it gets anywhere near that level.
Why? Because of a historical anomaly that has held throughout Bitcoin’s entire history, something I’ve mentioned many times. The high before a halving has never fallen below the low after the halving.
There was only one brief exception, and that exception turned out to be the absolute buying opportunity.
That “once-in-a-generation” opportunity is still fresh in everyone’s mind: the second half of 2022, around $10,000.
This cycle, that line sits at roughly $69,000.
Based on that historical pattern, it’s reasonable to assume that Strategy’s average purchase price will not be meaningfully breached.
Of course, if they keep buying, the average price changes, so the numbers always need to be monitored.
But at this stage, you can sketch out a scenario in which the world’s largest treasury company survives.
If that happens, the probability increases that the global accumulation culture remains deeply intact.
To be clear, this is framed purely as a worst-case scenario.
And as I often say. Once you’ve accepted the worst case, nothing worse tends to happen and the market’s greatest enemy, impatience, loses its power.
🚨Jack Yi's Trend Research built a $2.6 BILLION ETH leveraged long position via Aave. This month, they sold their entire holdings for $1.74 billion to repay their loans. They lost $750 MILLION on this trade.
🚨Jack Yi's Trend Research built a $2.6 BILLION ETH leveraged long position via Aave.

This month, they sold their entire holdings for $1.74 billion to repay their loans.

They lost $750 MILLION on this trade.
DO you KNOW?? Only 1,014,000 Bitcoin left to mine over the next 114 years. That’s it $BTC {spot}(BTCUSDT)
DO you KNOW??
Only 1,014,000 Bitcoin left to mine over the next 114 years.

That’s it
$BTC
KIDS ACCEPTING BITCOIN AT THEIR HOMEMADE LEMONADE STAND THE FUTURE IS BITCOIN 🧡
KIDS ACCEPTING BITCOIN AT THEIR HOMEMADE LEMONADE STAND

THE FUTURE IS BITCOIN 🧡
In 2010, Satoshi was believed to be Hal Finney. In 2012, Satoshi was believed to be Nick Szabo. In 2014, Satoshi was believed to be Dorian Nakamoto. In 2016, Satoshi was believed to be Craig Wright. In 2018, Satoshi was believed to be Adam Back. In 2020, Satoshi was believed to be Jack Dorsey. In 2022, Satoshi was believed to be Elon Musk. In 2024, Satoshi was believed to be Peter Todd. In 2026, Satoshi was believed to be Epstein. So there will be another FUD narrative in 2028.
In 2010, Satoshi was believed to be Hal Finney.

In 2012, Satoshi was believed to be Nick Szabo.

In 2014, Satoshi was believed to be Dorian Nakamoto.

In 2016, Satoshi was believed to be Craig Wright.

In 2018, Satoshi was believed to be Adam Back.

In 2020, Satoshi was believed to be Jack Dorsey.

In 2022, Satoshi was believed to be Elon Musk.

In 2024, Satoshi was believed to be Peter Todd.

In 2026, Satoshi was believed to be Epstein.

So there will be another FUD narrative in 2028.
I bought Bitcoin at $3,000 I bought Bitcoin at $69,000 I bought Bitcoin at $16,000 I bought Bitcoin at $126,000 Now Buying at $68,000 I'm buying Bitcoin at any price.
I bought Bitcoin at $3,000
I bought Bitcoin at $69,000
I bought Bitcoin at $16,000
I bought Bitcoin at $126,000

Now Buying at $68,000

I'm buying Bitcoin at any price.
yesterday in data on @Solana: - Sustained an average of 1852 TPS (ATH) - Biggest day for aggregators since 10/10, implying a ton of retail users came to trade - Fee volatility remained the lowest across all chains, and median fees were the lowest across all major chains at $0.000487 Basically, Solana reached never before seen usage and yet users paid predictably low fees for execution During this same period, Base experienced inclusion delays, with many users reporting the chain was unusable, and the median fee users paid to transact was 26x (!!!) that of Solana's Other notes: - ATH on tokenized stock volume - Record USDT availability on Solana, crossing over $3b in supply for the first time - Excluding 10/10, biggest day for some foreign wrapped tokens including Ethereum, and HYPE on Solana had it's biggest volume day ever - More wallets made a transaction on Solana than all other chains combined yesterday #sol
yesterday in data on @Solana:

- Sustained an average of 1852 TPS (ATH)

- Biggest day for aggregators since 10/10, implying a ton of retail users came to trade

- Fee volatility remained the lowest across all chains, and median fees were the lowest across all major chains at $0.000487

Basically, Solana reached never before seen usage and yet users paid predictably low fees for execution

During this same period, Base experienced inclusion delays, with many users reporting the chain was unusable, and the median fee users paid to transact was 26x (!!!) that of Solana's

Other notes:

- ATH on tokenized stock volume

- Record USDT availability on Solana, crossing over $3b in supply for the first time

- Excluding 10/10, biggest day for some foreign wrapped tokens including Ethereum, and HYPE on Solana had it's biggest volume day ever

- More wallets made a transaction on Solana than all other chains combined yesterday
#sol
2013: Bitcoin Bubble Burst $260 → $70 2014: Mt. Gox Collapse $1,000 → $400 2018: Crypto Winter $19,800 → $3,200 2020: COVID-19 Market Crash $9,100 → $4,000 2021: China Mining & Regulatory Crackdown $58,000 → $30,000 2022: Luna and FTX Collapse $69,000 → $15,000 2025: Tariff War and 10/10 Crash $126,000 → $84,000 2026: Epstein File and Global Sell-off $88,000 → $60,000 And Bitcoin will continue to print memories that we can always remember in times like this.
2013: Bitcoin Bubble Burst
$260 → $70

2014: Mt. Gox Collapse
$1,000 → $400

2018: Crypto Winter
$19,800 → $3,200

2020: COVID-19 Market Crash
$9,100 → $4,000

2021: China Mining & Regulatory Crackdown
$58,000 → $30,000

2022: Luna and FTX Collapse
$69,000 → $15,000

2025: Tariff War and 10/10 Crash
$126,000 → $84,000

2026: Epstein File and Global Sell-off
$88,000 → $60,000

And Bitcoin will continue to print memories that we can always remember in times like this.
·
--
Төмен (кемімелі)
WHAT THE ACTUAL F*CK? Bithumb accidentally sent hundreds of users 2000 BTC instead of 2000 KRW. Those who immediately dumped all their BTC, crashing the BTC price 10% lower on Bithumb compared to other exchanges. This is a classic example of paper BTC, as Bithumb's total reserves are just 46,000 BTC. $BTC {spot}(BTCUSDT)
WHAT THE ACTUAL F*CK?

Bithumb accidentally sent hundreds of users 2000 BTC instead of 2000 KRW.

Those who immediately dumped all their BTC, crashing the BTC price 10% lower on Bithumb compared to other exchanges.

This is a classic example of paper BTC, as Bithumb's total reserves are just 46,000 BTC.
$BTC
"Nobody uses Bitcoin"
"Nobody uses Bitcoin"
$ETH has lost 42% of its value in just 10 days.
$ETH has lost 42% of its value in just 10 days.
Bitcoin isn’t a random coin flip market. It behaves more like a regime-switching, path-dependent, non-linear stochastic system with structural constraints, where small inputs can trigger disproportionately large moves, even though outcomes remain probabilistic. Structural constraints: Programmatic supply decay (hard-coded) Network effects (Metcalfe's Law) Scarcity economics (fixed supply + growing utility = convex value) Reflexive leverage (creates overshoots and mean-reversion) Bullish doesn’t mean “up only.” It means price formation is not pure noise. Evidence: Hurst exponent: H ≈ 0.88 (random walk = 0.50) → strong persistence Variance-ratio tests across horizons reject random-walk behavior (p<0.001) Autocorrelation/runs tests reject independence Long-run log-log scaling fit is high (R² ~0.96 in real-history windows) For a coin-flip/random process, time-based trend fit is expected to be unstable and ~0% What that implies: Short term: brutal, reflexive, leverage-driven Long term: structured, path-dependent, trend-bearing So the bullish case is simple: If a process has memory and scales with time, deep drawdowns are not automatically thesis failure. They are often mean-reversion stress events inside a persistent growth regime. Rejecting random walk does not guarantee gains. It says price formation has structure and memory. Treating Bitcoin as pure randomness ignores the strongest signal in the data. Why this Matters: When a process has memory like Bitcoin, patience is not passive. It is an active statistical advantage. #dyor
Bitcoin isn’t a random coin flip market.

It behaves more like a regime-switching, path-dependent, non-linear stochastic system with structural constraints, where small inputs can trigger disproportionately large moves, even though outcomes remain probabilistic.

Structural constraints:
Programmatic supply decay (hard-coded)
Network effects (Metcalfe's Law)
Scarcity economics (fixed supply + growing utility = convex value)
Reflexive leverage (creates overshoots and mean-reversion)

Bullish doesn’t mean “up only.”
It means price formation is not pure noise.

Evidence:
Hurst exponent: H ≈ 0.88 (random walk = 0.50) → strong persistence

Variance-ratio tests across horizons reject random-walk behavior (p<0.001)

Autocorrelation/runs tests reject independence

Long-run log-log scaling fit is high (R² ~0.96 in real-history windows)

For a coin-flip/random process, time-based trend fit is expected to be unstable and ~0%

What that implies:
Short term: brutal, reflexive, leverage-driven
Long term: structured, path-dependent, trend-bearing

So the bullish case is simple:
If a process has memory and scales with time, deep drawdowns are not automatically thesis failure.

They are often mean-reversion stress events inside a persistent growth regime.

Rejecting random walk does not guarantee gains.
It says price formation has structure and memory. Treating Bitcoin as pure randomness ignores the strongest signal in the data.

Why this Matters:
When a process has memory like Bitcoin, patience is not passive.

It is an active statistical advantage.

#dyor
Do you think $BTC will see $40k again ? personally I don't think soo...
Do you think $BTC will see $40k again ? personally I don't think soo...
You never sell your Bitcoin, you never loan against your Bitcoin, you never take your Bitcoin off Self custody. MainStreet over Wall Street, they want to control us, we can't let them.
You never sell your Bitcoin, you never loan against your Bitcoin, you never take your Bitcoin off Self custody.
MainStreet over Wall Street, they want to control us, we can't let them.
LATEST: 📉 Vitalik Buterin has sold 6,183 ETH over three days, according to Lookonchain, the week after announcing he would use his personal funds to support Ethereum development. #ETH
LATEST: 📉 Vitalik Buterin has sold 6,183 ETH over three days, according to Lookonchain, the week after announcing he would use his personal funds to support Ethereum development.
#ETH
At $126K in October, $1 bought 793 Satoshis (0.00000793 BTC) Today, $1 buys 1,515 Satoshis (0.00001515 BTC)
At $126K in October, $1 bought 793 Satoshis (0.00000793 BTC)

Today, $1 buys 1,515 Satoshis (0.00001515 BTC)
If you: - borrowed against your Bitcoin stack when Bitcoin was $126K - had a 38% or higher LTV (loan-to-value) on your entire stack ($47,944+ loan if you have 1 BTC) - didn't have any more collateral to add when you received a margin call at 70% You would have gotten liquidated in today's wick down to $59,930, with an LTV of 80% ($47,944/$59,930) If you're going to borrow against your Bitcoin, always try to keep your LTV BELOW 10% so you can add more collateral whenever it's needed 10% LTV will protect you in case Bitcoin drops to $15,750, or 87.5% from the top Don't get liquidated Your lender will sell your Bitcoin at a massive loss to pay off your loan, and the process is automated (no negotiations)
If you:

- borrowed against your Bitcoin stack when Bitcoin was $126K
- had a 38% or higher LTV (loan-to-value) on your entire stack ($47,944+ loan if you have 1 BTC)
- didn't have any more collateral to add when you received a margin call at 70%

You would have gotten liquidated in today's wick down to $59,930, with an LTV of 80% ($47,944/$59,930)

If you're going to borrow against your Bitcoin, always try to keep your LTV BELOW 10% so you can add more collateral whenever it's needed

10% LTV will protect you in case Bitcoin drops to $15,750, or 87.5% from the top

Don't get liquidated

Your lender will sell your Bitcoin at a massive loss to pay off your loan, and the process is automated (no negotiations)
Басқа контенттерді шолу үшін жүйеге кіріңіз
Криптоәлемдегі соңғы жаңалықтармен танысыңыз
⚡️ Криптовалюта тақырыбындағы соңғы талқылауларға қатысыңыз
💬 Таңдаулы авторларыңызбен әрекеттесіңіз
👍 Өзіңізге қызық контентті тамашалаңыз
Электрондық пошта/телефон нөмірі
Сайт картасы
Cookie параметрлері
Платформаның шарттары мен талаптары