This time pointing to Daira Emma Hopwood, a trans woman formerly David-Sarah Hopwood, a cryptographer who worked on ZEC ،Why her?🤔
In 2010, Satoshi mentioned key blinding in a post, linking to Hopwood’s later work on private transactions and blinded keys ✴️
Add British citizenship, Satoshi’s British spelling, and GMT activity hours—people started connecting dots 👌 It seems compelling at first, but falls apart on closer look ،
Timeline mismatch: In 2008-2009, when Bitcoin was built, Hopwood was early in her career.Creating Bitcoin demanded deep expertise in cryptography, distributed systems, and economic design—skills that take years to master ↩️
Technical overlaps aren’t unique; key blinding is core cryptography many experts handle ☠️
Biggest issue: behavior.Satoshi vanished in 2011 and stayed hidden for 13+ years.Hopwood has been publicly active in crypto under her real name the entire time.If you created Bitcoin anonymously and disappeared, why then work openly on privacy coins? These theories keep surfacing—Szabo, Finney, dozens more.All rely on surface coincidences that crumble under scrutiny
Same pattern here ،Whoever Satoshi truly is—thanks for Bitcoin for now ، Without that spark, no crypto cards like useTria
, no AI like Velvet_Capital
for DeFi management.The entire ecosystem exists because someone
$ZEC
If you like me, like, follow and share the post🩸 Thank you 🙏 I love you
$PNUT 🤔📢 one of these pnut is supported by Pnut’s owner and all the creator fees are directed to him and being used to save animals and protect them ⚡️📢
(Pnut’s owner has a nonprofit Animal sanctuary with 500+ rescued animals) 🤔👀
the other one, both team and exchanges made millions on Pnut’s name and yet they donated 0$ to Pnut’s owner’s Animal sanctuary ⌛️📢
🚨⚡️ Here's the ice-cold take nobody wants to hear about XRP ?🤔
The billions of XRP flowing off Binance, Upbit, Kraken right now aren't all going to diamond-handed HODLers. Most of it is the new spot XRP ETFs (XRPC, etc.) soaking up retail & institutional money that would have otherwise traded on exchanges.
Why does that matter? Because lower on-exchange volume = thinner liquidity = way higher volatility.
Simple math: • $2-3B daily volume → you need $200M+ to move price 5-10% • <$1B daily volume → a $15M dump or wall swings us 12-18% in an hour
We've lived those weekends before. They're coming back until the market readjusts.
The saving grace? Arbitrage bots.
The same HFT firms crushing BTC/ETH ETF basis trades just changed one line of code and pointed it at XRP.
Whenever the ETF trades rich or cheap to NAV, they hammer the arb, forcing spot XRP and the ETF to stay glued together with <0.3% tracking error, just like Bitcoin today.
So yes, ETF inflows are insanely bullish and the underlying XRP still gets bought on every creation. We're not losing demand. We're just moving the volume from chaotic retail exchanges to institutional ETF order books + arb bots.
Translation: the long-term trend is stronger than ever, but the day-to-day chart on your favorite exchange is about to get a lot more whippy until volume settles again.
My move: watch ETF flow data religiously. 3.51 $ Jus is still coming ⚡️Just expect a few 20% air pockets on the way-up-only elevator
$BTC 🚨🚨 You shouldn’t hate bitcoin maxis, because it’s easy to reconcile Jack Dorsey’s statement with what he is building ☄️📢
With bitcoin you don’t NEED a bank, but you are still free to use one if you want to ⚡️📢
This may seem like splitting hairs, but the freedom to opt-out of banks is increasing competitive pressure on banks to improve their user experience. Even if the freedom is not exercised by everyone, its existence has option value for those who don’t use it ⚡️📢
🚨 Quantitative Tightening (QT) is ending on 1 December 2025 – what does this mean?
🤔📢
Following the outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, the Federal Reserve expanded its balance sheet dramatically, increasing it from roughly $4.2 trillion to about $8.9 trillion by April 2022.
After this unprecedented expansion, the Fed halted its quantitative easing (QE) program and began to shrink its balance sheet, reducing it to approximately $6.5 trillion by 28 November 2025.
So what does it actually mean for QT to end?
Under a standard tightening regime, the Fed allows its holdings of U.S. Treasuries (around $4.2 trillion), mortgage-backed securities (MBS) (about $2.2 trillion), and other assets (roughly $0.1 trillion) to mature without reinvestment, allowing the balance sheet to contract passively.
Beginning 1 December 2025, however, the Fed will redirect the principal payments from maturing MBS into U.S. Treasuries, rather than letting these proceeds roll off entirely.
While this shift does not constitute a return to QE, it does introduce a meaningful easing effect. By reinvesting MBS runoff into Treasuries, the Fed effectively adds incremental demand for U.S. government debt—placing it in direct competition with institutional investors. This additional demand can exert downward pressure on Treasury yields and, importantly, frees up institutional liquidity to be deployed elsewhere in the financial system. In this sense, the policy acts as a form of “synthetic QE.”
To put this into perspective: between 17 and 26 November, around $7 billion of MBS matured. Using this as a reference point, the Fed could be expected to redeploy on the order of $30 billion of cash into the Treasury market over a typical month—providing a non-negligible infusion of liquidity
How Meme Coin Factories and Speculation Turned Hope Into a Cash Extraction Machine ⚡️📢
Solana once promised speed, near zero fees and mass adoption. It was hailed as a blockchain that could help crypto go global.
Today it stands exposed as the largest playground for large scale extraction, scams and rug pulls.
A study called SolRPDS analysed 3.69 billion transactions on Solana from the years 2021 to 2024.
The result was shocking.
It identified 62,895 suspicious liquidity pools.
Among these pools 22,195 tokens showed clear rug pull patterns.
That means withdrawal of liquidity, inactivity and abandonment of the project.
The metrics are clear. Number of liquidity adds and removes. Ratio of adds to removes. Time of the last swap. Inactivity status.
These indicators allow an objective classification between legitimate and fraudulent pools.
This data shows very clearly that the problem on Solana is not an isolated case. It is structural.
The scam tokens outnumber legitimate projects many, many, many times over.
Let's begin:
🔺Meme Coin Launchpads and DEX Pools as Factories for Fraud
A central factor in this crisis are platforms like Pumpfun and DEXes like Raydium.
According to the 2025 report by Solidus Labs, more than 7 million tokens have been created on Pump.fun since the beginning of 2024.
Out of these only about 97,000 tokens maintained liquidity of more than 1,000 USD.
The rest became practically worthless almost immediately or were designed as scams from the start.
That means a survival chance of less than 1.4 percent.
You can hardly express systemic fraud more clearly than that.
Solidus Labs found further that 98.6 percent of all tokens launched on Pump fun are classified as rug pulls or pump and dump schemes.
In parallel, Raydium shows the same pattern.
In an analysis of 388,000 liquidity pools, around 93 percent displayed typical soft rug pull characteristics.
These pools attract investors with liquidity, create hype, draw money in and as soon as enough capital is locked, liquidity is pulled and investors are trapped.
The financial impact is documented.
The median rug pull caused losses of about 2,832 USD. Individual cases reached up to 1.9 million USD in damage.
These statistics clearly prove that the meme coin and DeFi infrastructure on Solana was an engine of value destruction, not a system for creating real value.
🔺Why Solana’s Technical Strength Turned Into a Risk
The technical properties of Solana, extremely low fees with transaction costs often being fractions of a cent and very fast transactions with finality in under one second, were originally a strength.
But exactly these advantages made Solana attractive for massive token abuse.
With negligible costs, scammers could create thousands of tokens, start listings, flood pools, dump on buyers and repeat the whole process again and again faster than any oversight or regulation could intervene.
The studies show that many pools had short term liquidity but then no trading activity, no swaps and no real users anymore. These are classic signs of rug pulls.
In this way Solana’s architecture turned its former unique selling point, speed and cheap transactions, into a perfect lever for systemic fraud.
🔺Regulation and Warnings Highlight the Risk
As scam volume increased, regulators began to step in. Based on the reports, Pumpfun was officially classified as a high risk platform. The market started to monitor platforms and DEXes more closely.
This regulatory pressure shows that fraud on Solana was not only a technical or moral issue. It is a systemic risk for investors, platforms and the entire DeFi ecosystem.
🔺The Bigger Picture: What This Data Means for Crypto
The combined results from SolRPDS, Solidus Labs and independent analysts paint a very clear picture. The meme coin economy on Solana was not a side phenomenon.
It was a structural problem at chain level.
➡️Millions of tokens created ➡️More than 60,000 suspicious pools ➡️Tens of thousands of tokens with proven rug pull patterns ➡️98.6 percent of new tokens effectively worthless ➡️93 percent of pools showing manipulative behaviour
These numbers make it obvious that every new wave of tokens on Solana carried a very high probability of being a scam project.
For investors this was a game with heavily rigged odds.
The losses are not only financial. Trust and credibility, and the chance for real DeFi innovation, all of that was destroyed. Solana stopped being seen as a serious platform. It was seen as a minefield.
🔺What Must Change: Transparency, Accountability, Real Value
If crypto wants to regain credibility, very fundamental changes are needed.
First, token launches must be transparent. Every token needs verifiable code audits. Ownership structures must be openly disclosed.
Second, liquidity pools must not be anonymous and uncontrolled. There must be locking mechanisms, locked liquidity and transparent management of LP tokens.
Third, monitoring and on chain analysis must become standard and projects like ours should be the watchdogs. Datasets like SolRPDS are essential tools, not academic luxuries.
🔺 Fourth, promoters, launchpad operators and DEX operators must be held accountable when they enable or tolerate fraudulent projects.🔺
Fifth, the community must reward real long term value. Utility, technology and sustainability. Not hype, not new memes and not quick profit.
Crypto needs protection mechanisms, not promos. It needs projects with real goals, not exit scams
$WLD 🚨 Something unusual is happening in the US Treasury market ✴️📢
China’s Treasury holdings as a % of all foreign holdings is down to 7.6%, the lowest in 23 years 📢
This percentage has declined -20 points over the last 14 years 📢
As a result, China now ranks as the world’s 3rd-largest foreign Treasury holder, after previously holding the top spot ⌛️
During the same period, the UK’s percentage has QUADRUPLED, to 9.4%, near the highest on record ⌛️
Meanwhile, Japan’s percentage, now the largest foreign owner of US Treasuries, has declined -26 points over the last 21 years, to 12.9%, near the lowest this century ⚡️
Foreign demand for US Treasuries is shifting in a historic way ⚡️