TheCoinrise Media

The exchange's new network lets users trade without moving funds onto its platform, with banks positioned as potential custody partners
Bitget has introduced the Open Custody Network, a new infrastructure layer that separates trading activity from asset custody. The system allows users to place trades on Bitget without first depositing funds directly into the exchange's own wallets. Instead, assets can remain with third-party custodians while still being used for trading on the platform.
The design responds to a long-standing concern in crypto markets: the risk of holding funds on an exchange. Collapses such as FTX in 2022 exposed how commingled or poorly secured exchange custody can wipe out customer assets overnight. Since then, demand has grown for trading models that keep custody and execution functionally separate.
According to reporting from crypto.news, the Open Custody Network is built specifically to enable trading without requiring exchange custody of user funds. CoinGape reported that the network is also structured to connect banks with crypto trading activity, suggesting Bitget intends the system to serve as a bridge for traditional financial institutions entering digital asset markets.
If banks are integrated as custody partners, it would mark a notable step in linking regulated banking infrastructure with crypto exchange trading. Banks are typically subject to strict capital, security, and compliance requirements. Connecting them to exchange trading flows could offer institutional clients a familiar custody framework while still accessing crypto liquidity.
This type of arrangement, sometimes referred to as off-exchange settlement, has been gaining traction across the industry. Several trading venues and custodians have built similar products that let institutional clients trade against exchange order books while assets sit with a neutral custodian. The approach is meant to limit counterparty risk tied to any single exchange.
Bitget has not detailed, based on available reporting, which specific banks or custodians might participate in the Open Custody Network, nor the technical mechanics of settlement between custody providers and the exchange's matching engine. Further specifics on supported assets, geographic availability, and onboarding requirements have not been confirmed in the reporting reviewed.
The launch comes as exchanges broadly face pressure to demonstrate stronger safeguards around customer assets. Regulators in multiple jurisdictions have pushed for clearer separation between trading venues and custody functions. Proof-of-reserves programs, third-party audits, and custody partnerships have become common responses across the industry.
For retail users, an open custody model could offer reassurance that funds are not solely dependent on exchange solvency. For institutional players, including banks, it may lower a barrier that has historically kept some from engaging directly with crypto exchanges.
Bitget is one of the larger global crypto exchanges by trading volume. Its move to build dedicated custody-separation infrastructure reflects a broader industry trend toward hybrid models that blend exchange liquidity with external custody assurances.
Market Impact
The launch could influence how institutional traders, including banks, approach exchange-based crypto trading going forward. By reducing the need to hold funds directly on an exchange, Bitget's network may lower a key risk factor that has kept some regulated entities cautious about direct exchange participation.
More broadly, if other exchanges follow with similar custody-separation products, it could accelerate a shift away from traditional deposit-based trading models across the sector. This would align with regulatory pressure in several markets for clearer custody-trading separation, though the pace and scale of adoption remain to be seen based on current reporting.
The Open Custody Network signals Bitget's effort to address custody risk concerns that have shaped crypto market structure since the FTX collapse. Whether banks and institutional players adopt the system at scale will depend on details not yet disclosed in current reporting.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bitget's Open Custody Network?
It is a new infrastructure system that lets users trade on Bitget's exchange while keeping their assets held outside the exchange's own wallets, reducing reliance on exchange custody.
Why does separating trading from custody matter?
Past exchange failures, such as the FTX collapse, showed that holding funds directly on an exchange carries risk if that platform mismanages or loses customer assets. Separating custody from trading aims to limit that exposure.
Will banks be involved in the Open Custody Network?
Reporting from CoinGape indicates the network is designed to connect banks with crypto trading, though specific bank partners have not been confirmed in available reporting.
Does this mean Bitget no longer holds any customer funds?
Not necessarily. The Open Custody Network offers an alternative custody arrangement, but details on how widely it applies across Bitget's services have not been fully disclosed.
Originally reported by AltcoinGordon, written by Noah Sullivan. Republished with permission.
View the original on AltcoinGordon →
The post New Open Custody Network Lets Traders Bypass Exchange Asset Control, Bitget Says appeared first on TheCoinrise.com.

Analysts point to repeated rejections at a key resistance level, with some flagging $1.00 as a downside risk.
XRP has spent the past week attempting to claw back ground after a broader pullback across digital assets. Reports from early November described the token recovering toward the $1.30 level, a zone traders have watched closely as a marker of near-term strength.
By the following day, a separate analysis described a different picture. XRP was reported to have been rejected at the same key resistance level for a second time. That rejection raised the possibility, according to the report, that the token could retest the $1.00 mark if buying pressure fails to return.
The contrast between the two accounts reflects how quickly sentiment can shift in a market still finding direction after weeks of volatility. A recovery toward resistance does not guarantee a breakout. Repeated failures to clear a level often signal that sellers remain in control, even when short-term bounces occur.
For XRP specifically, the $1.30 area has functioned as a technical ceiling in recent sessions. Traders typically watch for a decisive close above such a level, accompanied by rising volume, before treating a bounce as the start of a sustained move. Without that confirmation, price action can remain range-bound or reverse lower.
The downside scenario floated in the later report centers on $1.00, a round-number level that often attracts attention from both technical traders and longer-term holders. A drop toward that zone would represent a meaningful retracement from recent highs and could test the conviction of investors who bought during the token's earlier rally.
Broader context matters here as well. XRP's price action has often tracked developments tied to Ripple's ongoing regulatory and business activity, as well as wider market trends in Bitcoin and Ethereum. Shifts in risk appetite across crypto markets frequently filter down to mid-cap tokens like XRP, amplifying moves in either direction.
For now, the key question for XRP holders is whether the recent resistance rejection marks a temporary pause or a more extended period of consolidation. Market watchers will likely look to volume trends and broader crypto sentiment for clues in the coming sessions.
Market Impact
A failure to clear resistance near $1.30 could keep XRP range-bound in the near term, with some analysts flagging $1.00 as a potential downside level if selling pressure persists. Traders who positioned for a breakout may need to reassess exposure if the rejection pattern repeats.
More broadly, XRP's price behavior often serves as a sentiment gauge for mid-cap altcoins. Continued weakness could weigh on related tokens, while a successful break above resistance might signal renewed appetite for risk across the broader altcoin market.
XRP's path forward hinges on whether it can convert the current rebound attempt into a confirmed break above resistance, or whether renewed selling pushes the token back toward lower support levels.
Frequently Asked Questions
What level is XRP trying to break above?
Reports point to resistance near $1.30, a level XRP has struggled to clear in recent sessions.
What would confirm the rebound is holding?
Traders typically look for a decisive close above resistance along with rising trading volume before treating a bounce as sustained.
Could XRP fall back to $1.00?
One analysis flagged $1.00 as a possible downside target if XRP continues to be rejected at resistance and buying pressure weakens.
Why does XRP's price react to broader crypto market trends?
XRP, like many mid-cap tokens, tends to move in line with shifts in overall risk appetite across Bitcoin, Ethereum, and the wider crypto market.
Originally reported by AltcoinGordon, written by Sophia Bennett. Republished with permission.
View the original on AltcoinGordon →
The post XRP Rebound Toward $1.30 Stalls as Token Faces Resistance Again appeared first on TheCoinrise.com.

Tonight's page holds five stories confirmed by independent reporting and six that still rest on one or two outlets, and the second group is where the actual news is.
Tonight's page holds five stories confirmed by independent reporting and six that still rest on one or two outlets, and the second group is where the actual news is.
Five claims cleared the bar of independent confirmation
South Korea's proposal to delay its 22% crypto gains tax until 2029 was carried by five independent publishers, including BeInCrypto, Cointelegraph and CryptoBriefing, which makes it the best-supported story on the page today. Arkansas's lawsuit accusing Kalshi of running illegal gambling that causes mental harm reached four outlets, among them Decrypt and The Block, putting it on comparably solid ground. Arthur Hayes's warning that AI equity dilution could pressure Bitcoin prices also reached four publishers, even though the underlying summary notes the warning itself traces to only two outlets doing original reporting, a reminder that a wide feed count can sit on a narrow sourcing base. Trump Media's transfer of $344 million in Bitcoin to Crypto.com was reported by four independent publishers and five outlets overall, making the transfer itself one of the day's more durable facts. CERT-In's warning about AI-powered hackers targeting crypto and fintech firms reached three publishers, the minimum this newsroom treats as corroboration rather than a single claim repeated.
The unconfirmed half is larger than the confirmed one, and that is the point
Six stories on today's page never got past two publishers, and that group is not minor. Blockaid's $40 million in funding commitments following Binance's $6.3 billion hack rests on CryptoBriefing and The Cryptonomist EN alone. CZ's warning about a fake Trust Wallet site linked to a $1.1 million exploit comes from U.Today and crypto.news only. The claim that the naira failing to gain even as the dollar weakens is widening the parallel market gap is reported solely by BusinessDay NG and Nairametrics, both Nigerian outlets covering the same domestic market, which is not the same as independent confirmation from outside that market. Crédit Mutuel Arkéa's confirmed breach is real, the bank said so, but ZachXBT's flagged $133 million in suspected losses is the on-chain investigator's own figure and has not been independently verified at that number. None of these six are false. Unconfirmed is a sourcing status, not a verdict, and that distinction is the whole reason to keep the count rather than collapse it into a single headline.
One transfer produced two different confirmation counts
The most useful comparison on the page is not between two separate events but between two reports of the same one. The $75 million net inflow figure for spot Bitcoin ETFs, drawn from CryptoBriefing, sits against Cointelegraph's own $128 million combined figure for Bitcoin and Ether funds together, two numbers describing overlapping but not identical things under one general heading of ETF flows. Separately, a second account of the same Trump Media transfer, corroborated by only two independent publishers, duplicates a story that elsewhere reached four. Read together, the two Trump Media pieces show that the same underlying event can appear on this page with two different evidentiary weights depending on which report counted it, which is a caution against treating any single corroboration count as a fixed property of an event rather than of a particular writeup.
Of the thirteen stories on today's page, five were independently confirmed by three or more publishers; the remaining eight, including both versions of the Trump Media transfer, the Nigerian currency report and the Crédit Mutuel Arkéa loss figure, had not cleared that bar by the time this edition closed.
Stories in this edition
Publisher counts are as at publication and keep moving; each story page carries the live number.
22% Crypto Gains Tax Delay to 2029 Proposed by South Korea 5 independent publishers — established by five independent publishers, the best-supported story of the day
Arkansas Sues Kalshi Over Alleged Illegal Gambling, Cites Mental Harm 4 independent publishers — confirmed by four independent publishers including Decrypt and The Block
Bitcoin Prices Could Face Pressure From AI Equity Dilution, Says Arthur Hayes 4 independent publishers — wide feed count but original sourcing traced to only two outlets
Trump Media Transfers $344M in Bitcoin to Crypto.com as Shares Hit Record Low 4 independent publishers — confirmed by four independent publishers, the day's most durable fact
India's Cyber Agency Warns of AI-Powered Hackers Hitting Crypto and Fintech Firms 3 independent publishers — reached the minimum three-publisher threshold for corroboration
Blockaid Lands $40M in Funding Commitments Following Binance's $6.3B Hack 2 independent publishers — rests on only two publishers, unconfirmed beyond that
Fake Trust Wallet Site Linked to $1.1M Exploit Prompts Warning From Binance's CZ 2 independent publishers — reported by only two outlets, unconfirmed elsewhere
Naira Fails to Gain as Dollar Weakens, Parallel Market Gap Widens 2 independent publishers — sourced only from
Of the thirteen stories on today's page, five were independently confirmed by three or more publishers; the remaining eight, including both versions of the Trump Media transfer, the Nigerian currency report and the Crédit Mutuel Arkéa loss figure, had not cleared that bar by the time this edition closed.
Originally reported by AltcoinGordon, written by Grace Mitchell. Republished with permission.
View the original on AltcoinGordon →
The post Five of Today’s Thirteen Crypto Claims Reached Three or More Publishers appeared first on TheCoinrise.com.

Circleの準備金収入、Cantonのトークン化取引、韓国の半導体株売りについて、それぞれ両立しない2つの報道があり、いずれもここでは真偽を確定できません。
Circleの準備金収入、Cantonのトークン化取引、韓国の半導体株売りについて、それぞれ両立しない2つの報道があり、いずれもここでは真偽を確定できません。
Circle自身の決算で、減少幅に2つの異なる数字
American BankerとCoinGeekはどちらもCircleの第3四半期決算を報じ、前年同期比で準備金収入が減少したと伝えました。これは両者の報道で最も明確に一致している点です。見解が分かれているのは減少幅です。American BankerとCoinGeekの数字は一致せず、一方は8％減、もう一方は5％減としています。これは丸め誤差ではなく、ステーブルコインの経済性を理解するうえで中核的な要素となる準備金収入について、同じ四半期を異なる見方で捉えたものです。いずれの媒体も一次資料ではないため、ここでどちらの数字が誤りなのかを断定する根拠はありません。ただ、一方の通信社の報道だけを頼りにした読者は、もう一方を頼りにした読者とは、同収入がどれほどの速さで縮小しているかについて、実質的に異なる印象を持つことになるでしょう。

委任機能の欠陥により、権限のない第三者がネットワーク上で新しいトークンを発行できた可能性があります。
XRP Ledgerは、委任されたトークン焼却権限システムに関連するバグの修正を有効化しました。Crypto.newsとUnchainedの報道によると、開発者は、この欠陥により権限のない者がネットワーク上で新しいトークンを発行できた可能性があると述べています。
XRP Ledgerの委任権限を使うと、あるアカウントが別のアカウントに対し、アカウントの完全な管理権を渡すことなく、トークンの焼却など特定の操作を許可できます。こうした権限の仕組みは、台帳上の資産を管理する際に、発行者やアプリケーションがより柔軟に対応できるよう設計されています。

この訴訟は、わずか1週間のうちに予測市場運営会社を相手取って州が起こした3件目の訴訟となる。
アーカンソー州は、Kalshiが州内で違法なギャンブルサービスを運営しているとして、同社を提訴した。The Blockの報道によると、訴状では、Kalshiのイベント契約が利用者を従来のギャンブル商品に伴うものと同様の心理的被害にさらすと主張している。
Kalshiは連邦政府に登録された取引所として運営されており、選挙、経済指標、スポーツの結果など、現実世界の出来事に関する契約を提供している。同社は、自社の商品は賭けではなく規制対象のデリバティブであり、州のギャンブル法ではなく商品先物取引委員会（CFTC）の監督下にあると主張している。

The security firm's fundraising comes as the crypto industry reassesses defenses after one of the largest exchange breaches on record
Blockaid has secured $40 million in funding commitments, according to reports published this week. The announcement comes in the immediate aftermath of a $6.3 billion hack affecting Binance, one of the largest crypto exchanges by trading volume.
The timing of the funding news has drawn attention from industry observers. Reports frame the raise as part of a broader response to renewed concerns about crypto security following the breach. Blockaid operates in the blockchain security space, an area that has seen growing investor interest as exchanges and wallet providers confront escalating threats from hackers.
The $6.3 billion figure attached to the Binance hack marks it among the largest security incidents in the exchange's history. Breaches of this scale tend to ripple beyond the affected platform, prompting competitors, custodians, and infrastructure providers to reexamine their own defenses. Investors often respond to such events by directing capital toward firms positioned to address the underlying vulnerabilities.
Funding commitments, as distinct from a fully closed round, typically represent pledges from investors that are expected to convert into capital over a defined period. The distinction matters for assessing how quickly a company can deploy new resources. Details on Blockaid's investor base, valuation, or intended use of the funds have not been disclosed in the reports reviewed.
The broader context here is a crypto industry that has repeatedly confronted the costs of inadequate security infrastructure. Exchange hacks, bridge exploits, and wallet compromises have cost the sector billions of dollars over the past several years. Each major incident tends to accelerate adoption of improved monitoring, transaction screening, and threat detection tools.
Security-focused firms like Blockaid position themselves as part of the answer to this recurring problem. Their products typically aim to flag malicious transactions, detect phishing attempts, or screen smart contracts before funds are lost. Growing investor appetite for this category suggests that market participants view security spending as a durable, rather than cyclical, priority.
Binance has not been named in the reports as a direct party to Blockaid's funding round. The two events are linked by timing and by the shared theme of exchange security rather than by any disclosed business relationship.
Market Impact
The Binance hack is likely to keep crypto security spending in focus for exchanges, custodians, and institutional investors in the near term. Firms offering threat detection and transaction-screening tools may see increased investor and customer interest as a result.
For Blockaid specifically, the $40 million in commitments signals continued investor confidence in security infrastructure providers even during a period of heightened industry risk. The broader effect on token prices or exchange market share from the Binance incident has not been detailed in available reporting.
Blockaid's funding commitments underscore how major security incidents continue to shape investment flows within crypto infrastructure. Further details on the hack's resolution and the funding round's terms are expected to emerge as reporting continues.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Blockaid?
Blockaid is a blockchain security firm. Reports describing its $40 million funding commitments did not provide further detail on its product lineup or founding history.
How much funding did Blockaid secure?
Blockaid secured $40 million in funding commitments, according to reports from CryptoBriefing and The Cryptonomist EN.
What happened in the Binance hack?
Reports cite a $6.3 billion hack affecting Binance, though further operational details of the breach were not included in the available coverage.
Is Blockaid's funding directly connected to Binance?
The reports link the two events by timing and shared relevance to crypto security, but do not describe a direct business relationship between Blockaid and Binance.
Originally reported by AltcoinGordon, written by Victoria Reed. Republished with permission.
View the original on AltcoinGordon →
The post Blockaid Lands $40M in Funding Commitments Following Binance’s $6.3B Hack appeared first on TheCoinrise.com.

議員らは、デジタル資産の利益への課税をさらに先送りするため、より多くの時間を求めている。これは、何年も前に導入が計画された規則の新たな延期となる。
韓国の財務省は、暗号資産の利益に対する課税を2029年まで延期する案を提示した。税率は22％に設定されており、最初に法制化されて以来、すでに何度も延期されている。
この提案は水曜日にCryptoBriefingとBeInCryptoが報じ、両者とも、度重なる延期が続く中での最新の動きだと伝えた。韓国の議員らは、業界からの反発や政治的優先事項の変化を受け、施行時期を何度か見直してきた。

中間選挙後、ビットコインおよびイーサリアムのファンドに新たな資金が流入する中、他の発行体がブラックロックの資金流出を相殺した。
現物ビットコインETFは当日、カテゴリー最大のファンドで大規模な資金流出が記録されたにもかかわらず、純流入となった。CryptoBriefingによると、このカテゴリーには約7,500万ドルの新規資金が純流入した一方、ブラックロックのIBITファンド単独では2億100万ドルが流出した。
この組み合わせは、現物ビットコインETF市場の他の発行体が、IBITの資金流出を相殺するのに十分な量を上回る新たな資金を集めたことを示唆している。ファンドの運用開始以来、IBITはこの分野で圧倒的な存在となっているため、ブラックロックの商品から1日でこれほどの資金が流出したことは、カテゴリー全体の純流入と対照的だ。

American BankerとCoinGeekはどちらもCircleの第3四半期決算を報じていますが、準備金収益の前年同期比減少率について異なる数字を示しています。
American BankerとCoinGeekはどちらもCircleの第3四半期決算を報じていますが、準備金収益の前年同期比減少率について異なる数字を示しています。
すべての情報源が一致している点
Circleは総収益と準備金収益が8億6,500万ドルに達し、前年同期比17%増となったと報告しました。
1億8,200万ドルのARCトークンのプレセールにより、四半期の「その他の収益」が押し上げられました。
Circleの準備金運用利回りは61ベーシスポイント低下し、3.5%となりました。

CryptoBriefing reports specific share counts and dollar figures for the first tokenized CNTN trade, while crypto.news states the company did not disclose those numbers.
CryptoBriefing reports specific share counts and dollar figures for the first tokenized CNTN trade, while crypto.news states the company did not disclose those numbers.
What all sources agree on
TSV LLC executed the first tokenized stock trades for Canton Strategic Holdings (NASDAQ: CNTN) on November 4, 2026.
Five North sold the tokenized shares to DRW Cumberland.
Flowdesk provided liquidity for the transaction through the Tradecraft protocol.
Fairmint served as the SEC-registered transfer agent maintaining the ownership register.
The trades occurred under the SEC's Innovation Exemption, introduced September 17, 2026.
Where the reports disagree
1Whether specific trade figures (share count, price, total value) were disclosed
Five North sold approximately 14,461 CNTN shares to DRW Cumberland, with Flowdesk facilitating the deal.
CryptoBriefing 2026-11-05 00:05
The total came to about $30,296, at a price of roughly $2.08 per share.
CryptoBriefing 2026-11-05 00:05
Canton Strategic did not disclose the number of shares traded, their execution prices or the total transaction value.
crypto.news 2026-11-05 07:49
What would settle it: Canton Strategic Holdings' official trade announcement or the on-chain transaction record on the Canton Network
What to make of it
Treat the participants (Five North, DRW Cumberland, Flowdesk, Fairmint) and the SEC Innovation Exemption framework as established, but do not rely on the $30,296 / 14,461-share / $2.08 figures until the company or an on-chain record confirms them, since crypto.news reports the company declined to disclose that data.
Treat the participants (Five North, DRW Cumberland, Flowdesk, Fairmint) and the SEC Innovation Exemption framework as established, but do not rely on the $30,296 / 14,461-share / $2.08 figures until the company or an on-chain record confirms them, since crypto.news reports the company declined to disclose that data.
Originally reported by AltcoinGordon, written by Noah Sullivan. Republished with permission.
View the original on AltcoinGordon →
The post Canton CNTN Tokenized Trade: Were Figures Disclosed? appeared first on TheCoinrise.com.

Changpeng Zhao氏は、関連するエクスプロイトによる損失が110万ドルに達するなか、Trust Walletユーザーを狙ったフィッシング詐欺に警鐘を鳴らしました。
Binanceの創設者であるChangpeng Zhao氏は、暗号資産保有者を狙ったフィッシング詐欺について公に警告しました。警告では、人気のセルフカストディ型ウォレットアプリであるTrust Walletになりすました偽ウェブサイトが具体的に名指しされました。
報道によると、この偽サイトはすでにエクスプロイトとの関連が確認されており、約110万ドルの損失が発生しています。CZ氏は自身のプラットフォームを通じてユーザーに直接注意を呼びかけ、正規のウォレット提供事業者を装う見慣れないリンクやウェブサイトにアクセスする前に慎重になるよう促しました。

ブロックチェーン調査員が多額の損失の疑いについて懸念を示した後、フランスの銀行グループは情報漏えいを認めた。
フランス有数の地方銀行グループであるCrédit Mutuel Arkéaは、サイバー攻撃を受けたことを認めた。この発表は、ブロックチェーン調査員のZachXBTが事件について公に懸念を示した後に行われた。ZachXBTは、この侵害に関連して約1億3300万ドルの損失が発生した疑いを指摘した。
ZachXBTは、暗号資産市場で盗難資金やエクスプロイトを追跡することで評価を築いてきた。従来型の銀行をめぐる報道に同氏が関わっている点は注目に値する。これは、従来の銀行インフラとブロックチェーンベースの資産の流れが重なり合う可能性を示唆しているが、現時点の報道では侵害の正確な仕組みは明らかになっていない。

CERT-In says attackers are using artificial intelligence to breach exchanges and fintech platforms at what it calls machine speed
India's Computer Emergency Response Team, known as CERT-In, has flagged a new wave of cyberattacks aimed at the country's crypto and fintech sectors. The agency says the attacks are being carried out by a hacker group using artificial intelligence tools to speed up and scale its operations.
According to the warning, the group is targeting crypto exchanges and fintech firms at what CERT-In describes as machine speed. That phrase points to a shift in how cybercriminals are operating. Automated systems can scan for vulnerabilities, craft phishing attempts, and adapt tactics far faster than human-led teams working through traditional methods.
CERT-In functions as India's primary cybersecurity watchdog, issuing advisories to businesses and government bodies when it identifies credible threats. Its warnings typically prompt firms to review security protocols, patch known vulnerabilities, and tighten access controls. The agency has not been reported as naming the specific hacker group involved, nor has it detailed which exchanges or fintech firms have already been affected.
The warning arrives as India's crypto and fintech industries continue to expand, drawing both legitimate investment and the attention of cybercriminals. Exchanges hold large pools of digital assets and sensitive customer data, making them attractive targets. Fintech platforms, which often handle payments and lending, present similar risks given the volume of financial data they process daily.
AI-assisted hacking has become a growing concern across the global cybersecurity community. Security researchers have noted that generative AI tools can help attackers write more convincing phishing messages, identify weaknesses in code, and automate parts of an intrusion that once required significant manual effort. This can compress the time between an initial breach attempt and a successful compromise, leaving defenders with less room to react.
For crypto exchanges specifically, the stakes are higher than for many other industries. Stolen funds can often be moved and laundered within minutes, especially when attackers use cross-chain tools or decentralized platforms to obscure the trail. That makes early detection and rapid response especially important once a breach begins.
CERT-In's advisory is likely to push Indian crypto and fintech firms to reassess their current defenses against AI-enhanced threats. Companies may need to invest in automated monitoring systems of their own, capable of detecting unusual activity in real time rather than relying solely on periodic audits.
The warning also reflects a broader pattern seen in other markets, where regulators and cybersecurity agencies have begun treating AI-powered attacks as a distinct category of risk, separate from conventional hacking attempts. India's response may offer a signal of how other national agencies could approach similar threats in the months ahead.
Market Impact
A government warning of this kind does not directly move crypto prices, but it can influence investor confidence in platforms operating within India's jurisdiction. Exchanges named or implicated in future disclosures could face scrutiny over their security practices, particularly if customer funds or data are compromised.
Fintech firms tied to crypto payment rails may also see increased compliance costs as they work to meet heightened security expectations. If CERT-In's warning leads to tangible breaches becoming public, it could accelerate calls for stricter cybersecurity standards across India's digital asset industry.
CERT-In's warning underscores how artificial intelligence is reshaping the threat landscape facing crypto and fintech firms. As AI tools become more accessible to attackers, Indian regulators and companies alike may face pressure to adopt faster, more automated defenses.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CERT-In?
CERT-In, or the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team, is India's national agency responsible for monitoring cybersecurity threats and issuing warnings to businesses and government bodies.
What does 'machine speed' mean in this context?
The term refers to attacks carried out with the help of artificial intelligence, which can scan systems, craft phishing attempts, and adapt tactics faster than traditional human-led hacking methods.
Which companies have been affected by these attacks?
CERT-In's warning did not specify particular crypto exchanges or fintech firms that have already been targeted or breached.
Why are crypto exchanges considered high-risk targets?
Exchanges hold large amounts of digital assets and customer data, and stolen funds can often be moved quickly across blockchains, making fast detection critical.
How might firms respond to this warning?
Companies are likely to review and strengthen their cybersecurity protocols, including deploying automated monitoring tools designed to detect unusual activity in real time.
Originally reported by AltcoinGordon, written by Benjamin Clarke. Republished with permission.
View the original on AltcoinGordon →
The post India’s Cyber Agency Warns of AI-Powered Hackers Hitting Crypto and Fintech Firms appeared first on TheCoinrise.com.

トランプ大統領と関係のあるメディア企業が4,259 BTCを移動、株価は選挙後の最安値に
Truth Socialの親会社であるTrump Media & Technology Groupは今週、保有するビットコインのかなりの部分を移動した。ブロックチェーンの追跡により、約3億4,400万ドル相当の4,259 BTCが暗号資産取引所Crypto.comに送金されたことが確認された。この取引はCryptoBriefingとcrypto.newsが報じ、両社はそのタイミングが注目に値すると指摘した。
DJTのティッカーで取引されているTrump Mediaの株価が、米中間選挙以降の最安値まで下落する中で、この送金は行われた。同社が今年初めにビットコイン保有を軸とする財務戦略を採用して以来、投資家は同社の株価を注視している。この戦略は、ヘッジや成長への賭けとしてデジタル資産を貸借対照表に加えてきた他の上場企業の動きに倣うものだ。

BitMEXの共同創業者は、大手AI企業で株式売却が起きる可能性が、暗号資産市場の下落リスクにつながると指摘しています。
BitMEXの元CEOで、現在はMaelstromの最高投資責任者を務めるArthur Hayes氏が、ビットコインを取り巻くリスクについて新たな警告を発しました。同氏は、人工知能関連企業に伴う株式の希薄化が暗号資産市場にも波及する可能性があると主張しています。CryptoBriefingとcrypto.newsはともに、11月5日にこの発言を報じました。
Hayes氏は、暗号資産業界で特に注目されるマクロ経済コメンテーターの一人として知られています。同氏は、伝統的金融、金融政策、企業の資本市場における動向を、ビットコインの価格推移と結び付けて論じることが多くあります。今回の警告もその姿勢に沿ったもので、AI関連株の動向をデジタル資産の評価額と結び付けています。

株価が上場以来の最安値に沈むなか、Trump Media & Technology Groupがこの動きを見せた。
CryptoBriefingの報道によると、Trump Media & Technology Groupは約3億4,400万ドル相当のビットコインを暗号資産取引所Crypto.comに移動した。DJTのティッカーシンボルで取引されている同社の株価が、公開取引開始以来の最安値に下落するなかでの移動だった。
Truth Socialプラットフォームの親会社であるTrump Mediaは、企業の財務戦略の一環として、多額のビットコインを保有していることを以前に公表している。近年、従来の現金や株式以外のデジタル資産への投資を目指す企業の間で、ビットコインをバランスシート上に保有することが一般的になっている。

提案されているネットワーク変更により、別々のハッキング事件で盗まれた資金に紐づく、約650万ドル相当のトークンが解放される可能性がある。
報道によると、Polygonは、7,049万POLトークンの凍結を解除し、BinanceとPolymarketに返還するハードフォークを検討している。約650万ドル相当のこれらのトークンは、両プラットフォームに影響を及ぼした別々のハッキング事件に関連づけられて以来、ネットワーク上でロックされているという。
ハードフォークとは、ブロックチェーンの今後のルールを変更する、プロトコルレベルの変更である。単純なソフトウェアパッチとは異なり、通常はバリデーターやノード運営者が新しいコンセンサスコードを採用する必要がある。今回のフォークは、凍結されたPOLを元の保有者に返すため、専用に送金経路を変更するよう設計されると報じられている。

選挙後に暗号資産市場全体が上昇するなか、トランプ氏の名前に結びついたトークンは市場を下回るパフォーマンスとなった。
BeInCryptoの報道によると、ドナルド・トランプ氏の名前に関連する暗号資産市場の一部は、選挙後にセクター全体を押し上げた上昇の恩恵を受けなかった。主要な暗号資産や関連資産がリスク選好の回復を受けて上昇する一方、トランプブランドに関連するトークンは出遅れたという。
報道では具体的な数値は示されていないが、こうした資産の一部が政治的なセンチメントやヘッドライン主導の取引と密接に結びついてきたことを踏まえ、今回の低調なパフォーマンスは注目に値するとしている。政治をテーマにしたトークンは、選挙や選挙活動の節目、あるいはその名を冠する人物の発言をめぐり、価格が急変することが多い。

ビットコイン価格の上昇を受け、マイニングと財務運用を手掛ける同社の四半期業績は押し上げられた。一方で、相場上昇が鈍化した場合に何が起きるのかという疑問も浮上している。
ティッカーシンボルABTCで取引されるAmerican Bitcoinは、対象期間に1億2,600万ドルの利益を計上した。これは主に、保有するビットコインの価値が1億9,700万ドル増加したことによるものだ。この数字は、同社にとってこれまでで最も好調な業績の一つとなった。
この利益は、主に事業の成長やマイニング生産量の拡大によって生じたものではない。むしろ、同社のバランスシートに計上されているビットコインの値上がりを反映したものだ。ビットコイン価格の上昇に伴い、ABTCの準備資産の含み価値も増加し、その分が業績に直接反映された。