TechnicalTrader

2013年、ダビンチ・ジェレミーという名前の男性が、YouTuberであり初期のビットコインユーザーである彼が、人々にビットコインにわずか1ドルを投資するように言いました。その時、1ビットコインの価格は約116ドルでした。彼は、ビットコインが無価値になったとしても、彼らが失うのは1ドルだけなので、小さなリスクだと言いました。しかし、ビットコインの価値が上がれば、大きなリターンをもたらす可能性があるとも言いました。残念ながら、当時、彼の言うことを聞いた人はあまりいませんでした。
今日、ビットコインの価格は大幅に上昇し、最高で9万5000ドルを超えました。ジェレミーのアドバイスを受けてビットコインを購入した人々は今や非常に裕福です。この早期の投資のおかげで、ジェレミーは今、ヨットやプライベートジェット、豪華な車で贅沢な生活を送っています。彼の物語は、新しいものへの小さな投資が大きな利益につながることを示しています。

先週、古いハードドライブを見ていて、データを失うストレスがどれほど嫌いかを実感しました。
あなたは、写真や文書の山があるとき、毎月支払っているクラウド会社が永遠にビジネスを続けることを望む気持ちがどのようなものか知っていますよね。
私は何か違うものを探し始めたとき、ウォルラスというプロジェクトに出会いました。
私は開発者ではありませんが、自分の人生をかける前に物事がどのように機能するかを知るのが好きです。ほとんどのストレージは他の誰かのコンピュータに過ぎないことに気づきましたが、ウォルラスは地球全体に広がる巨大なデジタル安全ネットのように感じます。

この前、ストレージダッシュボードを見ていて、ウォルラスがどのように私のデータを裏で処理しているかをついに理解したことに気づきました。それは、どこかの部屋にある静的なハードドライブの山ではありません。
それは、常に情報の断片を動かして健康を保つ生き物のようなものです。これは、シャード移行と呼ばれる何かを通じて起こります。シャードを、保存されている全データの小さなスライスと考えることができます。
これらのスライスは、ゲームにどれだけの皮膚を持っているかに基づいてコンピュータを運営している人々の間を移動します。私のデータは一箇所に本当に留まっていないことに気づきました。それは、全体のシステムを正直に保つデジタル担保である、最も多くの利害を持つ人に基づいて動きます。

I was sitting at my desk last Tuesday trying to move some digital assets around when it hit me how much I hate the guessing game of crypto fees.
You know how it is when you try to send a simple payment or mint a little art project and suddenly the price of the network token spikes.
One minute you are paying pennies and the next minute the screen tells you it will cost twenty dollars for the exact same move. It feels like trying to buy a loaf of bread but the price changes while you are standing in the checkout line.
I started looking into how Vanar handles this because I heard they were doing things differently for regular people like us. Most blockchains use a gas system where the cost depends on how busy the network is or how high the price of their specific coin goes.

If the coin doubles in value your transaction costs double too which makes no sense for a consumer. Vanar decided to fix this by pegging the cost to the actual dollar instead of just letting the coin price dictate everything.
The first time I used it I realized that I actually knew what I was going to spend before I clicked the button.
They have this system where a basic transaction like sending a token or swapping something small costs exactly half of a tenth of a cent.
That sounds like a math puzzle but it just means it is point zero zero zero five dollars every single time.
"The cost of doing business should not be a surprise you get at the end of the transaction."
That is the first hard truth I realized while using this chain. If you are a developer or even just a person trying to manage a few NFTs you need to know your budget.
Vanar uses a foundation that checks the price of their token from different sources and cleans up the data to make sure the network knows exactly what a dollar is worth at that moment.
This means the system adjusts itself so my fee stays the same in dollar terms even if the token price is jumping all over the place.
I used to worry that if a network was this cheap someone would just spam it and break everything for the rest of us. We have all seen it happen where one person sends a million tiny messages and the whole chain freezes up for hours.
Vanar has this tiered system that I actually appreciate as a consumer even though it sounds like a rule at first. They basically say that if you are doing normal stuff like a regular person you pay the tiny fee I mentioned before.
But if you try to send a massive transaction that takes up a huge amount of space in a block the price goes up. This is not to be mean to big users but to keep the bad actors from choking the system.
If it costs almost nothing to fill a block an attacker could stop the network for eight hours with just five dollars in their pocket.
"Cheap fees are a gift for users but a weapon for those who want to break the system."
By making the massive transactions cost more like one dollar or fifteen dollars depending on the size it makes it way too expensive for anyone to attack us.
It keeps the lanes clear for people like me who just want to move our tokens or bridge a few assets without waiting in a digital traffic jam. I like the idea that the rules are there to protect my access to the network.
You might think that different tiers would be confusing but as a user I do not even have to calculate it. The protocol just handles the math in the background.
It feels like driving on a highway where the toll is always the same for a car but the giant trucks have to pay more because they wear down the road faster. It is just fair.
"Market volatility is a problem for traders but it should never be a problem for users."
I really felt that when the markets got crazy last week. While everyone else was complaining about gas fees on other chains spiking because of the volume my costs on Vanar stayed exactly where they were.
It provides a level of stability that makes me feel like I am using a real tool rather than gambling on a network.
Whether you are a small project or a giant company the predictability is what matters most. I do not want to check a price chart before I decide to use an app.
I just want the app to work for the price I expect. Vanar seems to understand that the tech needs to fade into the background.
"A blockchain is only as good as the confidence you have in your next click."
I have spent a lot of time over the years frustrated with how complicated things are. We talk about mass adoption but we expect people to understand fluctuating gas limits and slippage. Vanar feels like a step toward a world where the tech acts like a normal utility.

I keep coming back to it because it is the only place where I do not feel like I am being penalized for the network being popular.
When more people join the fees do not have to go up for the little guy. That is a huge relief when you are just trying to explore what is possible with digital ownership.
"Predictability is the only way to turn a hobby into a real economy."
Looking back at how much I used to stress over transaction timing I realize how much mental energy I was wasting. Now I just do what I need to do and move on with my day.
It is a simple shift but it changes how I interact with everything. I think that is why I stay here because it finally feels like the system is working for me instead of the other way around.
what you think about this? don't forget to comment 💭
Follow for more content 🙂
$VANRY #Vanar @Vanar

I used to think that every new blockchain was like moving to a completely different country where I had to learn a whole new language just to buy a loaf of bread. Every time a friend told me about a new project, my first thought was always about how much work it would be to move my assets or learn a new wallet.
Then I started looking into Vanar and realized that it felt less like moving to a foreign country and more like moving into a new house in the same neighborhood I already know.
The reason for this comfort is something called EVM compatibility which sounds technical but is actually a lifesaver for regular people like us.

Most of the stuff we do in crypto happens on the Ethereum Virtual Machine which is basically the engine that runs most of the big apps and wallets we use every day.
Because Vanar is built to be compatible with this engine it means everything just works the way I expect it to.
"If it is not easy to use then nobody is going to show up for the long haul."
That is a reality I have seen play out so many times in this space. I have tried using chains that were supposedly the next big thing but they were so isolated that I felt like I was stuck on an island.
With Vanar it feels like they built a bridge before they even opened the doors. I can use the same tools and the same logic that I have been using for years.
You know how it is when you download a new app and you have to spend an hour watching tutorials just to figure out the home screen. We do not have time for that anymore.
I want to be able to jump in and start doing things right away without feeling like I need a computer science degree.
When I first connected my wallet to the network I realized that the rules were the same as everywhere else I like to hang out.
"Compatibility is the only way to survive in a world with too many choices."
That quote stuck with me because it explains why so many projects fail while others grow. Vanar is not trying to reinvent the wheel just for the sake of being different.
They are making the wheel faster and better while keeping it the same shape so it fits on our existing cars. For a consumer like me that means I do not have to throw away my old tools or learn a brand new interface.
I talked to a developer friend of mine who was looking for a place to move his project. He told me that moving to a chain that is not EVM compatible is like trying to rewrite a whole book in a different language.
It takes forever and things get lost in translation. But because Vanar uses that familiar engine he can just pick up his work and move it over in a weekend.
"A blockchain is only as good as the apps that actually run on it."
This is the hard truth about the industry right now. We do not need more empty networks that boast about high speeds if there is nothing to actually do once you get there.
Vanar seems to understand that by making it easy for developers to migrate they are making it better for us users because we get more games and more tools to play with.
I remember the frustration of trying to use a bridge to move funds to a non-compatible chain and losing my mind over the complicated steps.
It was a nightmare of clicking through multiple windows and hoping I did not lose my money in the process.
With this project that anxiety is mostly gone because the environment is so familiar that it feels like second nature.
"We are tired of starting from scratch every time a new network launches."
I think that sums up how most of us feel these days. We have put in the time to learn how things work and we want projects that respect that effort.
Vanar feels like a project that was built by people who actually use the internet and understand that convenience is just as important as technology.
It is about making the transition feel like a natural next step instead of a giant leap into the dark.
The reality of the situation is that the ecosystem is already huge and trying to fight against that is a losing battle.
By joining the club instead of trying to build a rival one Vanar has made it easy for everyone to collaborate.
I see projects moving over not because they have to but because it makes sense for their growth and for their users.
"The best technology is the kind that stays out of your way while you use it."
I realized that this is exactly what is happening here. I do not spend my time thinking about the technical specs of the engine when I am driving a car and I should not have to think about the backend of a blockchain when I am using an app.
Everything feels smooth because the groundwork was laid out with compatibility in mind from the very first day.
It is honestly refreshing to see a project admit that the existing tools are good and that they want to work with them instead of against them.
It makes me feel more confident as a consumer because I know that my assets and my knowledge are still valuable here. I do not feel like I am taking a risk by trying something new when the foundation is something I already trust.
At the end, I just want things to work without a headache. Vanar matters to me because it proves that you can be innovative and powerful without being difficult or confusing.
That kind of simplicity is exactly what we need if we want this whole space to actually grow into something everyone can use.
what you think about this? don't forget to comment 💭
Follow for more content 🙂
$VANRY #Vanar @Vanar

I used to think that saving a file to a cloud was like putting a piece of paper in a physical drawer.
You just shove it in there and hope the drawer stays locked. But when I started looking into how things actually work with Walrus, I realized that my data is not just one thing anymore.
It is more like a giant puzzle that gets broken into tiny pieces and scattered across the world.
The first time I tried to understand Red Stuff and the way this network handles my files, I felt a bit overwhelmed.
It is the engine that makes the whole system reliable. You know how it is when you lose an internet connection and everything just stops? This system is designed to keep going even when things are messy.
It is built to handle the fact that some computers on the network might be slow or even trying to trick the system.

I noticed that Walrus does not just save one copy of my file. It uses something called Red Stuff to chop my data into parts called slivers. These are not just random chunks.
They are mathematically linked so that even if some parts of the network go offline, the whole thing can be put back together. I learned that there are primary and secondary slivers which act like a safety net for each other.
"The system assumes people might be dishonest and prepares for it."
When I upload a file, which they call a blob, the writer sends pieces to different storage nodes. Each node is just a computer somewhere in the world.
The cool part is that these nodes talk to each other to make sure they all have what they need. If one node is missing a piece, it asks its neighbors.
Because of the way the math works, they can rebuild a missing piece if they have enough other parts.
I was curious about what happens if a node tries to lie to me. That is where the vector commitment comes in. Think of it like a digital seal on a wax envelope.
If a node sends me a piece of data that does not match that seal, I know immediately. It is not just about trusting the person running the computer.
It is about the math making it impossible for them to change my data without me noticing.
"You can only get your data back if the math says it is all there."
There is a lot of talk about write completeness in the technical papers.
For me, that just means that if I send my file into the network, I can be sure it actually got there. The nodes keep checking in until they are all holding their assigned pieces.
It feels like a group of people holding hands in a circle. If one person lets go, the others can pull them back in.
Reading the data back is just as important. I found out that the network has something called read consistency.
This is the rule that says if I can see my file, then anyone else who is supposed to see it will see the exact same thing. We either both get the file or we both get nothing.
There is no middle ground where I see a corrupted version while you see the real one.
"Trust is not required when you have a proof you can check yourself."
I also worried about whether nodes would actually keep my data over time. In some systems, a node might delete things to save space.
But with Walrus, they have these things called proofs. A node has to prove it is still holding the specific pieces it was given. If it deletes even one small symbol, it will fail the challenge because it won't have enough parts to reconstruct the proof.
The math behind this is pretty strict. A node needs a specific number of symbols to rebuild a sliver.
If it tries to cheat by colluding with other bad nodes, it still won't have enough pieces to pass the test. It is like trying to finish a hundred-piece puzzle with only forty pieces.
No matter how much you move them around, the picture is never going to be complete.
"A node cannot fake having data it already threw away."
Using this feels different from using a normal hard drive. On a drive, if a sector fails, that data is just gone. Here, the data is alive in a way.
It is constantly being verified and shared among nodes that make sure nothing is lost. It gives me a sense of security that I didn't have before I understood how the pieces fit together.

Everything in this project seems to come down to these proofs. Whether it is writing a new file, reading an old one, or just making sure the storage providers are doing their jobs, there is always a check in place.
It is a very structured way of handling information that assumes the worst about the world but hopes for the best.
"The network is only as strong as the math that holds it together."
I like the idea that my files are not sitting on a single server owned by one big company.
Instead, they are floating in this decentralized web, protected by Red Stuff. It is a bit like a digital insurance policy.
I don't have to worry about one company going out of business or one server crashing in a data center halfway across the country.
Ultimately, I use Walrus because I want my data to be permanent and unchanged.
Knowing that every honest node will eventually hold the right pieces makes me feel better about where I put my digital life.
It is not just storage. It is a system that treats my files as something worth protecting with every mathematical tool it has.
what you think about this? don't forget to comment 💭
Follow for more content 🙂
$WAL #Walrus @WalrusProtocol

ウォルラスのような分散型ネットワークに私たちのデジタルライフを保存することについて話すとき、私たちはセキュリティについて考えなければなりません。
ハッカーを排除するだけでなく、データをアップロードする人々がルールに従っていることを確認することも重要です。
時々、「悪意のあるライター」が故意に壊れたデータや間違って混乱させたデータをアップロードしようとすることがあります。
これらの状況をどのように処理するかを説明したいので、ネットワークがクリーンであり、あなたのデータが信頼できる状態を保ちます。
ウォルラスシステムでは、ファイルはスライバーと呼ばれる部分に分割されます。これらの部分は異なるストレージノードに送信されます。

I want to take a moment to talk to you about something we often take for granted: how digital information stays safe when the computers holding it need to change.
In a world of decentralized storage, we use a protocol called Walrus. Since it is decentralized, the group of computers, which we call storage nodes is always changing. People come and go, and new hardware replaces the old.
When a new group of nodes takes over from an old group, we call this a committee reconfiguration.
It is a bit like a relay race where the baton is your precious data. We need to make sure that the handoff is perfect every single time.
If we miss even a small part of that handoff, your files could disappear, and that is exactly what we work to prevent.
I think it is amazing how the system maintains a constant flow of data even when the entire "staff" is being replaced.
Our main goal is to keep the data available at all times, no matter how many times the committee changes between different time periods, which we call epochs.

The Challenge of Moving Massive Data
I want you to imagine moving a massive library from one building to another. In most blockchain systems, you are only moving small pieces of paper. But with Walrus, we are moving huge amounts of state. This is a much bigger challenge because the sheer volume of data is orders of magnitude larger than what most networks handle.
Sometimes, this moving process can take several hours. During those hours, the network has to be careful. If users are uploading new files faster than the nodes can move the old ones, the process could get stuck. We have to manage this race between new information coming in and old information being transferred out.
We also have to prepare for the reality that some nodes might go offline or stop working during the move. To solve this, Walrus uses clever math to recover data even if some parts are missing. It ensures that the "cost" of moving the data stays the same even if some nodes are being difficult or slow.
How We Keep the System Running During the Move
You might be wondering if the system has to shut down while all this moving is happening. The answer is a firm no. We use a very smart design where we never have to stop your reads or writes. We actually keep both the old committee and the new committee active at the same time during the transition.
The moment we start moving things over, we tell the system to send all new "writes" to the new group. However, if you want to "read" an old file, the system still points you toward the old group that has been holding it. This way, there is no downtime for you, and everything feels as fast as usual.
This dual-committee approach is what makes Walrus so reliable. It is like having two teams of movers working together to make sure that while one team is loading the truck, the other team is already setting up the new house. You never lose access to your belongings for even a second.
Using Metadata to Find Your Files
I know it sounds complicated to have two groups of nodes running at once, but we have a very simple way to keep track of it all. We use something called metadata. Every "blob" of data has a small tag that says exactly which epoch it was born in. This tag acts like a map for your requests.
If the tag says the data belongs to the new epoch, the system knows to talk to the new committee. If it is an older file, it goes to the old committee. This only happens during the short window of time when the handoff is taking place. It is a brilliant way to ensure no one gets lost during the move.
Once the handoff is complete, we dont need those directions anymore because the new committee becomes the primary home for everything. I find this to be a very human way of organizing a digital space—simply labeling things so everyone knows exactly where to go.
Signaling When the New Team is Ready
How do we know when it is officially time to let the old committee retire? We wait for a signal. Every member of the new group has to "bootstrap" themselves, which basically means they download and verify all the data slivers they are responsible for keeping safe.
Once a node has everything ready, it sends out a signal to the rest of the network. We wait until a clear majority—specifically more than two-thirds—of the new committee says they are ready. Only then do we officially finish the reconfiguration and let the new group take full control.
This signaling process is like a safety check. It ensures that we never turn off the old system until we are 100% sure the new system is standing on its own two feet. It keeps the data protected and ensures that the transition is based on facts and readiness, not just a timer.

Why This Keeps Your Data Secure Forever
The beauty of this whole process is that it protects the integrity of your data across years of changes.
The security rules of Walrus ensure that even if the nodes change, the data is always held by enough honest participants to keep it alive. This is the core promise of the protocol.
Even if the network faces errors or some nodes act up, the math behind the slivers ensures that the "truth" of your file is never lost.
By requiring such a strong majority to move from one epoch to the next, we create a chain of custody that is incredibly hard to break.
I hope this helps you see that while the technology is complex, the goal is simple: making sure your digital life stays permanent and accessible.
Walrus is built to grow and change without ever forgetting what it is holding for you.
what you think about this? don't forget to comment 💭
Follow for more content 🙂
$WAL #Walrus @WalrusProtocol