News
Top 3 Price Predictions: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple – Bears in control, with next support at BT
09 Nov 2026, 03:24:49 Bitcoin trades around $75,530 on Monday, having closed below key EMAs, with next support at $70,000. Ethereum is around $2,155 after correcting over 6.5% last week, as bears target the psychological $2,000 level. XRP trades around $1.11 on Monday after correcting over 10% last week, with the next key zone around $1. Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH) and Ripple (XRP) bears remain in control, with the top three cryptocurrencies correcting over 4%, 6% and 10%, respectively, last week and marking their fifth consecutive weeks of losses. BTC trades around $75,530 on Monday after closing below key Exponential Moving Averages (EMAs), leaving the $70,000 level as its next major support. Meanwhile, ETH hovers near $2,155, while XRP trades around $1.11, with both altcoins facing downside risks toward $2,000 and $1, respectively. Bitcoin closes below major supports Bitcoin price trades at $75,530 on Monday, maintaining a bearish near-term tone as it holds below key Exponential Moving Averages (EMAs). The 200-day EMA at $76,463 acts as the first overhead cap, followed higher by the 100-day EMA at $77,635 and the 50-day EMA near $79,327, all reinforcing a structure of persistent topside supply. Momentum conditions remain soft, with the Relative Strength Index (RSI) hovering in the high-30s and the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) stuck in negative territory, hinting that selling pressure still outweighs dip-buying interest. On the topside, immediate resistance is located at the 200-day EMA around $76,463, ahead of a secondary barrier at the 100-day EMA near $77,635 and a deeper recovery hurdle at the 50-day EMA close to $79,327. Further up, a horizontal resistance line at $85,000 marks a stronger bullish validation level where buyers would need to reclaim ground to challenge the broader bearish bias. On the downside, the absence of nearby mapped support suggests that any break lower from current levels would send BTC toward the psychological support zone around $70,000 before stabilizing. BTC/USDT daily chart Ethereum bears eye $2,000 mark Ethereum price trades at $2,155 on Monday, maintaining a bearish near-term bias as it remains well below the 200-day EMA at $2,311, the 100-day EMA at $2,337, and the 50-day EMA at $2,372. The loss of the previously upward-sloping support trendline, now broken around $2,432, reinforces a corrective tone, while the RSI hovering near 35 and the MACD in negative territory suggest lingering downside momentum rather than outright capitulation. On the topside, initial resistance is seen at the 200-day EMA near $2,311, followed by the 100-day EMA at $2,337 and the 50-day EMA at $2,372, with a more notable horizontal barrier at $2,400 and the former rising trendline break zone around $2,432 capping any stronger rebound. On the downside, the next meaningful support sits around the key $2,000 level ahead of the prior horizontal base around $1,823, where buyers would be expected to show more robust interest if the current decline extends. ETH/USDT daily chart XRP bears aiming for next key support XRP price trades at $1.119 on Monday, extending a bearish near-term tone as it holds well below the 50-day, 100-day and 200-day EMAs clustered between roughly $1.303 and $1.368. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) at 28 sits in oversold territory. At the same time, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator remains negative, which together hint at persistent downside pressure even as the market risks a short-term pause or modest bounce from depressed levels. On the topside, initial resistance appears at $1.160, ahead of a stronger cap near $1.300 and the nearby EMA cluster between the 50-day EMA at $1.303 and the 100-day EMA at $1.308; beyond that, the 200-day EMA at $1.368 and horizontal levels at $1.540 and $1.900 define higher barriers. On the downside, the nearest meaningful support is located at the psychological $1.000 handle, where a break would likely expose the pair to a deeper bearish extension in the sessions ahead. XRP/USDT daily chart (The technical analysis of this story was written with the help of an AI tool. Know more.) Cryptocurrency prices FAQs How do new token launches or listings affect cryptocurrency prices? Token launches influence demand and adoption among market participants. Listings on crypto exchanges deepen the liquidity for an asset and add new participants to an asset’s network. This is typically bullish for a digital asset. How do hacks affect cryptocurrency prices? How do macroeconomic releases and events affect cryptocurrency prices? How do major crypto upgrades like halvings, hard forks affect cryptocurrency prices? #BitcoinFiveWeeklyLosses #ETHETFsApproved #TradingCommunity Source:Fxstreet
Inflationary or deflationary tendencies are measured by periodically summing the prices of a basket of representative goods and services and presenting the data as The Consumer Price Index (CPI). CPI data is compiled on a monthly basis and released by the US Department of Labor Statistics. The YoY reading compares the prices of goods in the reference month to the same month a year earlier.The CPI is a key indicator to measure inflation and changes in purchasing trends. Generally speaking, a high reading is seen as bullish for the US Dollar (USD), while a low reading is seen as bearish.
The Unemployment Rate released by the Eurostat is the percentage of unemployed workers in the total civilian labor force. It is a leading indicator for the economy of the European Union. If the rate goes up, it indicates a lack of expansion within the European labor market and a weakening of the economy. Generally speaking, a decrease of the figure is seen as bullish for the Euro (EUR), while an increase is seen as bearish
News Federal Reserve: One more 2026 hike then murkier path – BNY 03 Nov 2026, 11:59:40 BNY Markets’ John Velis maintains the view that the Federal Reserve will deliver one additional rate hike in December to preserve credibility after its latest hold. He sees a murkier outlook heading into 2027, arguing inflation is mainly supply-driven and expectations anchored. Velis doubts higher rates can address supply pressures but warns demand-side risks could justify more tightening later.
December hike then uncertain 2027 path "After last week’s anticipated hold by the FOMC, we maintain our view that there will be one additional rate hike in December this year, to preserve Fed credibility. Heading into 2027, the landscape appears much murkier."
"Yes, inflation remains high, and the recent bout of higher oil prices will undoubtedly keep the pressure on prices. We’ve argued, and continue to argue, that inflation is mainly supply driven, and that inflation expectations remain well anchored over long horizons."
"We’re not convinced that higher rates will be able to rein in supply pressures, as they are indeed a demand-management tool. Nevertheless, it bears watching to see if demand-side pressures emerge in 2027, in which case interest rate remedies would be appropriate."
"We noted with some interest Warsh’s assertion at last week’s press conference that the interest rate hike in September tightened financial conditions meaningfully, since aside from the AI-related wobbles in October, there’s scant evidence of such tightening pervading across the real economy."
"Still, should financial jitters persist, conditions will naturally tighten, requiring fewer hikes in 2027 than the two currently priced in."
(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor. Know more.)
Will US Stocks Rise After Midterm Elections? Analysis of Historical Election Data and Market Patte
2026-11-2 10:03 Fact CheckerMitrade fengmian TradingKey - As the U.S. midterm elections approach, in addition to focusing on the election results and their impact on economic policies, investors are also searching for clues regarding the next phase of U.S. stock market trends. Although the S&P 500 Index remains near record highs, semiconductor and popular AI stocks have experienced a noticeable pullback recently, and market concerns over high valuations, returns on AI capital expenditure, and the interest rate outlook have not faded. Historical data offers a relatively optimistic answer. Following the conclusion of midterm elections, U.S. stocks typically enter a phase of stronger performance. However, this pattern primarily reflects a decrease in political uncertainty, stabilizing policy expectations, and improving corporate earnings, and does not mean the market will inevitably rise. US Stocks Are Typically Strong After Midterm Elections According to statistics from Matt Cerminaro, founder of Exhibit A, the S&P 500 Index has posted an average gain of 15.5% from Midterm Election Day through June 30 of the following year since 1950. Another study by JPMorgan also shows that since 1950, the S&P 500 has generated positive returns in the 12 months following every midterm election, with an average gain of approximately 15%. sp500-1421509181b94902b75108c205eae41b If the observation window is narrowed to the six months following an election, the seasonal pattern is equally evident. Since the S&P 500 Index was established in 1957, the index has never posted a negative return during the November-to-April period following a midterm election, and its overall performance has significantly outperformed the same period in other years of a presidential term. Why US Stocks Are More Likely to Rise After Midterm Elections A decline in political uncertainty is an important factor explaining this pattern. Research by Terry Marsh, professor emeritus of finance at UC Berkeley, and Kam Fong Chan, professor at the University of Western Australia, found that the U.S. Economic Policy Uncertainty Index typically rises in the months leading up to midterm elections and falls significantly after the elections. After the election results are announced, investors can more accurately gauge the congressional power structure and the future direction of taxation, fiscal spending, and industry regulation. As political risks that need to be priced into stock prices decrease, capital often flows back into risk assets such as equities. Historical data also shows that the market does not consistently favor any single political party. Compared to a victory by the Republicans or Democrats, whether the policy environment is stable and whether the structure of government power is clear generally have a more direct impact on asset prices. Fidelity research shows that weak performance in midterm election years is often linked to rising policy uncertainty rather than investors simply supporting a specific party. Seasonal factors also help: the period from November after the midterm elections through April of the following year is inherently a traditionally strong period for U.S. equities. The waning of election uncertainty coinciding with favorable seasonality makes historical returns during these six months particularly notable. Why the Third Year of a Presidential Term Usually Performs Best Following the midterm elections, the U.S. will enter the third year of the presidential four-year term. According to data from CFRA Research, the S&P 500 Index has averaged a gain of 16.3% in the third year of a presidential term, higher than the first year's 9.5%, the second year's 3.8%, and the fourth year's 6.8%. In terms of quarterly performance, the fourth quarter of a midterm election year rises by an average of 6.4%, ranking second among all 16 quarters in the four-year cycle; closely following it, the first quarter of the third year averages a 7% gain, making it historically the strongest quarter. This pattern may be linked to policy cycles: to campaign for the next presidential election, the governing party typically pushes policies in the second half of its term to stimulate the economy, improve employment, or raise household income. These measures are gradually reflected in consumption, investment, and corporate earnings, thereby providing fundamental support for the stock market. However, fiscal stimulus does not come without a price. If policies further drive up deficits, inflation, and Treasury yields, highly valued growth stocks may instead face greater pressure. Therefore, the historical advantage of the third year still requires support from the interest rate and corporate earnings environment. Can US Stocks Repeat Historical Patterns in 2026 One of the market's biggest headwinds currently is high interest rates. Even as the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield once pulled back below 5%, long-term financing costs remain at multi-year highs. Higher risk-free yields diminish the relative appeal of equities and increase the costs for companies to construct data centers, procure AI chips, and expand production capacity. The return on AI capital expenditures will also impact the post-election market trend. Big tech companies such as Meta are committing massive funds to build computing infrastructure, but the market is increasingly focused on when this capex can translate into revenue and free cash flow. If growth in cloud computing, advertising, and enterprise AI businesses fails to cover depreciation and financing costs, tech stock valuations may remain under pressure. The upcoming Anthropic IPO may also add liquidity-drainage pressure to the stock market. A large-scale initial public offering requires absorbing substantial liquidity; if it coincides with high interest rates and waning risk appetite, short-term volatility in the tech sector could amplify further. On a relatively positive note, U.S. mega-cap corporate earnings remain resilient. As long as 2027 earnings expectations are not significantly revised downward, corporate profit growth could offset some of the pressure from interest rates and oil prices. Given that tech stocks account for nearly 40% of the S&P 500's weight, for the index to replicate historical post-election gains, tech giants including Microsoft, Nvidia, Apple, Amazon, and Meta will still need to participate in the rally. Overall, historical data following U.S. midterm elections is relatively optimistic for U.S. equities, but what truly drives the market is not the election itself, but rather reduced political uncertainty, stable policy expectations, and corporate earnings growth. The historical average gain of around 15% can serve as a reference for market research, but should not be viewed as a definitive forecast. Once the election concludes, investors will still need to closely monitor Treasury yields, inflation, AI investment returns, and earnings guidance from big tech companies. Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Get it on Will US Stocks Rise After Midterm Elections? Analysis of Historical Election Data and Market Patterns TradingKey 2026-11-2 10:03 Fact CheckerMitrade fengmian TradingKey - As the U.S. midterm elections approach, in addition to focusing on the election results and their impact on economic policies, investors are also searching for clues regarding the next phase of U.S. stock market trends. Although the S&P 500 Index remains near record highs, semiconductor and popular AI stocks have experienced a noticeable pullback recently, and market concerns over high valuations, returns on AI capital expenditure, and the interest rate outlook have not faded. Historical data offers a relatively optimistic answer. Following the conclusion of midterm elections, U.S. stocks typically enter a phase of stronger performance. However, this pattern primarily reflects a decrease in political uncertainty, stabilizing policy expectations, and improving corporate earnings, and does not mean the market will inevitably rise. US Stocks Are Typically Strong After Midterm Elections According to statistics from Matt Cerminaro, founder of Exhibit A, the S&P 500 Index has posted an average gain of 15.5% from Midterm Election Day through June 30 of the following year since 1950. Another study by JPMorgan also shows that since 1950, the S&P 500 has generated positive returns in the 12 months following every midterm election, with an average gain of approximately 15%. sp500-1421509181b94902b75108c205eae41b If the observation window is narrowed to the six months following an election, the seasonal pattern is equally evident. Since the S&P 500 Index was established in 1957, the index has never posted a negative return during the November-to-April period following a midterm election, and its overall performance has significantly outperformed the same period in other years of a presidential term. Why US Stocks Are More Likely to Rise After Midterm Elections A decline in political uncertainty is an important factor explaining this pattern. Research by Terry Marsh, professor emeritus of finance at UC Berkeley, and Kam Fong Chan, professor at the University of Western Australia, found that the U.S. Economic Policy Uncertainty Index typically rises in the months leading up to midterm elections and falls significantly after the elections. After the election results are announced, investors can more accurately gauge the congressional power structure and the future direction of taxation, fiscal spending, and industry regulation. As political risks that need to be priced into stock prices decrease, capital often flows back into risk assets such as equities. Historical data also shows that the market does not consistently favor any single political party. Compared to a victory by the Republicans or Democrats, whether the policy environment is stable and whether the structure of government power is clear generally have a more direct impact on asset prices. Fidelity research shows that weak performance in midterm election years is often linked to rising policy uncertainty rather than investors simply supporting a specific party. Seasonal factors also help: the period from November after the midterm elections through April of the following year is inherently a traditionally strong period for U.S. equities. The waning of election uncertainty coinciding with favorable seasonality makes historical returns during these six months particularly notable. Why the Third Year of a Presidential Term Usually Performs Best Following the midterm elections, the U.S. will enter the third year of the presidential four-year term. According to data from CFRA Research, the S&P 500 Index has averaged a gain of 16.3% in the third year of a presidential term, higher than the first year's 9.5%, the second year's 3.8%, and the fourth year's 6.8%. In terms of quarterly performance, the fourth quarter of a midterm election year rises by an average of 6.4%, ranking second among all 16 quarters in the four-year cycle; closely following it, the first quarter of the third year averages a 7% gain, making it historically the strongest quarter. This pattern may be linked to policy cycles: to campaign for the next presidential election, the governing party typically pushes policies in the second half of its term to stimulate the economy, improve employment, or raise household income. These measures are gradually reflected in consumption, investment, and corporate earnings, thereby providing fundamental support for the stock market. However, fiscal stimulus does not come without a price. If policies further drive up deficits, inflation, and Treasury yields, highly valued growth stocks may instead face greater pressure. Therefore, the historical advantage of the third year still requires support from the interest rate and corporate earnings environment. Can US Stocks Repeat Historical Patterns in 2026 One of the market's biggest headwinds currently is high interest rates. Even as the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield once pulled back below 5%, long-term financing costs remain at multi-year highs. Higher risk-free yields diminish the relative appeal of equities and increase the costs for companies to construct data centers, procure AI chips, and expand production capacity. The return on AI capital expenditures will also impact the post-election market trend. Big tech companies such as Meta are committing massive funds to build computing infrastructure, but the market is increasingly focused on when this capex can translate into revenue and free cash flow. If growth in cloud computing, advertising, and enterprise AI businesses fails to cover depreciation and financing costs, tech stock valuations may remain under pressure. The upcoming Anthropic IPO may also add liquidity-drainage pressure to the stock market. A large-scale initial public offering requires absorbing substantial liquidity; if it coincides with high interest rates and waning risk appetite, short-term volatility in the tech sector could amplify further. On a relatively positive note, U.S. mega-cap corporate earnings remain resilient. As long as 2027 earnings expectations are not significantly revised downward, corporate profit growth could offset some of the pressure from interest rates and oil prices. Given that tech stocks account for nearly 40% of the S&P 500's weight, for the index to replicate historical post-election gains, tech giants including Microsoft, Nvidia, Apple, Amazon, and Meta will still need to participate in the rally. Overall, historical data following U.S. midterm elections is relatively optimistic for U.S. equities, but what truly drives the market is not the election itself, but rather reduced political uncertainty, stable policy expectations, and corporate earnings growth. The historical average gain of around 15% can serve as a reference for market research, but should not be viewed as a definitive forecast. Once the election concludes, investors will still need to closely monitor Treasury yields, inflation, AI investment returns, and earnings guidance from big tech companies.
The Nonfarm Payrolls release presents the number of new jobs created in the US during the previous month in all non-agricultural businesses; it is released by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The monthly changes in payrolls can be extremely volatile. The number is also subject to strong reviews, which can also trigger volatility in the Forex board. Generally speaking, a high reading is seen as bullish for the US Dollar (USD), while a low reading is seen as bearish, although previous months' reviews and the Unemployment Rate are as relevant as the headline figure. The market's reaction, therefore, depends on how the market assesses all the data contained in the BLS report as a whole.
The Federal Reserve (Fed) deliberates on monetary policy and makes a decision on interest rates at eight pre-scheduled meetings per year. It has two mandates: to keep inflation at 2%, and to maintain full employment. Its main tool for achieving this is by setting interest rates – both at which it lends to banks and banks lend to each other. If it decides to hike rates, the US Dollar (USD) tends to strengthen as it attracts more foreign capital inflows. If it cuts rates, it tends to weaken the USD as capital drains out to countries offering higher returns. If rates are left unchanged, attention turns to the tone of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement, and whether it is hawkish (expectant of higher future interest rates), or dovish (expectant of lower future rates).