Gommorrah
79 投稿
Gommorrah
報告
ユーザーをブロック
7 years cryptocurrency experience
94 フォロー
50 フォロワー
97 いいね
投稿
すべて
引用
·
--
翻訳参照
$NES Hello everyone let's make a group to put more pressure on binance and $NES
i am the group admin.Should we use WhatsApp or telegram!I suggest WhatsApp
we were blocked from selling !!!
$NES Hello everyone let's make a group to put more pressure on binance and $NES
i am the group admin.Should we use WhatsApp or telegram!I suggest WhatsApp
we were blocked from selling !!!
i am the group admin.Should we use WhatsApp or telegram!I suggest WhatsApp
we were blocked from selling !!!
1
5
·
--
翻訳参照
$NES it does not matter when you bought.A scam took place
$NES it does not matter when you bought.A scam took place
804
·
--
$NES Holders。私たちは騙されて、誰も何も受け取れません。バイナンスのすべてのホルダーは、損失100%のみを受け取ることになります。
$NES Holders。私たちは騙されて、誰も何も受け取れません。バイナンスのすべてのホルダーは、損失100%のみを受け取ることになります。
2
718
·
--
$NES $BNB
$Nesa 保有者は置き去りにされた
率直に言おう。ここで実際にお金を失った人たちがいる。
Binance Alphaの保有者たちは、$NES を正当なプロジェクトだと信じて購入した。ところが、その後にエクスプロイトが起き、流動性は消え、トークンは暴落し、コミュニティは答えを求めて右往左往することになった。
そして、さらに悪いのは何か？
沈黙だ。
運営が次に何が起きるのかについてほとんど明確な説明をしないまま、人々は自分の資金が消えていくのを見ている。これをラグプルと呼ぼうが、見捨てられたと言おうが、単なる壊滅的な失敗だと言おうが、多くの保有者にとって結果は同じだ。彼らは傷ついている。
私たちはNesaをエクスプロイトしていない。
私たちはプロトコルを操作していない。
私たちは数百万ドルを盗んでいない。
私たちは、あのクソみたいなトークンを買っただけだ。
今や、普通の保有者たちが損を抱えさせられている。
もしNesaが少しでも信用を取り戻したいなら、隠れるのをやめて、保有者たちに自分たちのトークンに何が起きているのかを正確に説明しろ。
$NES $BNB
$Nesa 保有者は置き去りにされた
率直に言おう。ここで実際にお金を失った人たちがいる。
Binance Alphaの保有者たちは、$NES を正当なプロジェクトだと信じて購入した。ところが、その後にエクスプロイトが起き、流動性は消え、トークンは暴落し、コミュニティは答えを求めて右往左往することになった。
そして、さらに悪いのは何か？
沈黙だ。
運営が次に何が起きるのかについてほとんど明確な説明をしないまま、人々は自分の資金が消えていくのを見ている。これをラグプルと呼ぼうが、見捨てられたと言おうが、単なる壊滅的な失敗だと言おうが、多くの保有者にとって結果は同じだ。彼らは傷ついている。
私たちはNesaをエクスプロイトしていない。
私たちはプロトコルを操作していない。
私たちは数百万ドルを盗んでいない。
私たちは、あのクソみたいなトークンを買っただけだ。
今や、普通の保有者たちが損を抱えさせられている。
もしNesaが少しでも信用を取り戻したいなら、隠れるのをやめて、保有者たちに自分たちのトークンに何が起きているのかを正確に説明しろ。
$Nesa 保有者は置き去りにされた
率直に言おう。ここで実際にお金を失った人たちがいる。
Binance Alphaの保有者たちは、$NES を正当なプロジェクトだと信じて購入した。ところが、その後にエクスプロイトが起き、流動性は消え、トークンは暴落し、コミュニティは答えを求めて右往左往することになった。
そして、さらに悪いのは何か？
沈黙だ。
運営が次に何が起きるのかについてほとんど明確な説明をしないまま、人々は自分の資金が消えていくのを見ている。これをラグプルと呼ぼうが、見捨てられたと言おうが、単なる壊滅的な失敗だと言おうが、多くの保有者にとって結果は同じだ。彼らは傷ついている。
私たちはNesaをエクスプロイトしていない。
私たちはプロトコルを操作していない。
私たちは数百万ドルを盗んでいない。
私たちは、あのクソみたいなトークンを買っただけだ。
今や、普通の保有者たちが損を抱えさせられている。
もしNesaが少しでも信用を取り戻したいなら、隠れるのをやめて、保有者たちに自分たちのトークンに何が起きているのかを正確に説明しろ。
1
1
6
829
·
--
翻訳参照
$NES $MARSCOIN .@nesaorg halted on 24 August. All its endpoints still return 503, so this is reconstructed from Ethereum. CosmosEVM chain, so we know what’s the likely cause.
The attacker bought 1.1M NES on the open market and bridged it into Nesa. Eight hours later they bridged out 257,703,783 NES, about 25.8% of the 1B supply.
The Hyperlane warp route logs both directions on Ethereum:
Deposited 03:13–04:12 UTC: 1,114,564.66 NES
Withdrawn 10:51:47 UTC: 257,703,783.16 NES
Difference: 256,589,218.50 NES that was never deposited
The delivery transaction gives the origin. Hyperlane domain 41443 (Nesa), sender is Nesa’s HypNative route, recipient is the attacker.
etherscan.io/tx/0xd443eabd4…
Attacker: etherscan.io/address/0x9AE7…
Sell wallet: etherscan.io/address/0xB92d…
They sold 185,744,335 NES in 241 fills through CoW Protocol and Uniswap V4 between 15:11 and 16:09 UTC. Realised price went from $0.0125 to $0.00032. Proceeds were 95.97 ETH, roughly $237,208.
At 13:40 they burned a further 25,000,000 NES on Ethereum to bridge back into Nesa. That message never delivered because the chain had stopped. It mints on restart unless Nesa rolls back past it or Hyperlane blocks it.
etherscan.io/tx/0x575d6cc25…
I have not confirmed which precompile was used. On MANTRA, TAC and KiiChain I read the call directly. Nesa’s nodes are down, so the link to ASA-2026-002 is pattern only.
If you verify this, use 0x230f1e24… for Nesa’s Ethereum $NES. 0xEEC6574e… is KiiChain’s synthetic, deployed to the same address on a different chain.
etherscan.io/token/0x230f1e…
$NES $MARSCOIN .@nesaorg halted on 24 August. All its endpoints still return 503, so this is reconstructed from Ethereum. CosmosEVM chain, so we know what’s the likely cause.
The attacker bought 1.1M NES on the open market and bridged it into Nesa. Eight hours later they bridged out 257,703,783 NES, about 25.8% of the 1B supply.
The Hyperlane warp route logs both directions on Ethereum:
Deposited 03:13–04:12 UTC: 1,114,564.66 NES
Withdrawn 10:51:47 UTC: 257,703,783.16 NES
Difference: 256,589,218.50 NES that was never deposited
The delivery transaction gives the origin. Hyperlane domain 41443 (Nesa), sender is Nesa’s HypNative route, recipient is the attacker.
etherscan.io/tx/0xd443eabd4…
Attacker: etherscan.io/address/0x9AE7…
Sell wallet: etherscan.io/address/0xB92d…
They sold 185,744,335 NES in 241 fills through CoW Protocol and Uniswap V4 between 15:11 and 16:09 UTC. Realised price went from $0.0125 to $0.00032. Proceeds were 95.97 ETH, roughly $237,208.
At 13:40 they burned a further 25,000,000 NES on Ethereum to bridge back into Nesa. That message never delivered because the chain had stopped. It mints on restart unless Nesa rolls back past it or Hyperlane blocks it.
etherscan.io/tx/0x575d6cc25…
I have not confirmed which precompile was used. On MANTRA, TAC and KiiChain I read the call directly. Nesa’s nodes are down, so the link to ASA-2026-002 is pattern only.
If you verify this, use 0x230f1e24… for Nesa’s Ethereum $NES. 0xEEC6574e… is KiiChain’s synthetic, deployed to the same address on a different chain.
etherscan.io/token/0x230f1e…
The attacker bought 1.1M NES on the open market and bridged it into Nesa. Eight hours later they bridged out 257,703,783 NES, about 25.8% of the 1B supply.
The Hyperlane warp route logs both directions on Ethereum:
Deposited 03:13–04:12 UTC: 1,114,564.66 NES
Withdrawn 10:51:47 UTC: 257,703,783.16 NES
Difference: 256,589,218.50 NES that was never deposited
The delivery transaction gives the origin. Hyperlane domain 41443 (Nesa), sender is Nesa’s HypNative route, recipient is the attacker.
etherscan.io/tx/0xd443eabd4…
Attacker: etherscan.io/address/0x9AE7…
Sell wallet: etherscan.io/address/0xB92d…
They sold 185,744,335 NES in 241 fills through CoW Protocol and Uniswap V4 between 15:11 and 16:09 UTC. Realised price went from $0.0125 to $0.00032. Proceeds were 95.97 ETH, roughly $237,208.
At 13:40 they burned a further 25,000,000 NES on Ethereum to bridge back into Nesa. That message never delivered because the chain had stopped. It mints on restart unless Nesa rolls back past it or Hyperlane blocks it.
etherscan.io/tx/0x575d6cc25…
I have not confirmed which precompile was used. On MANTRA, TAC and KiiChain I read the call directly. Nesa’s nodes are down, so the link to ASA-2026-002 is pattern only.
If you verify this, use 0x230f1e24… for Nesa’s Ethereum $NES. 0xEEC6574e… is KiiChain’s synthetic, deployed to the same address on a different chain.
etherscan.io/token/0x230f1e…
1
2
684
·
--
一部該当
翻訳参照
$NES Nes project team has withdrawn most of the pools, what are they up to this time? @nesaorg
bscscan.com/address/0x19d8…
$NES Nes project team has withdrawn most of the pools, what are they up to this time? @nesaorg
bscscan.com/address/0x19d8…
bscscan.com/address/0x19d8…
1
2
511
·
--
翻訳参照
$NesBinance Alpha’s Stranded NES Holders
Nesa’s exploit and subsequent migration have left a major question for Binance Alpha NES holders: what happens to the tokens they bought on the old BSC contract?
Binance Alpha was the first platform to feature NES, giving its users direct access to the token.
But after the exploit, Nesa moved toward a new token structure, leaving holders of the old BSC NES in an uncertain position. Without a clear migration mechanism, these tokens risk becoming effectively worthless, even though holders acquired them legitimately.
The frustrating part is simple: the holders didn't exploit anything. They bought NES normally, yet they could be left holding the version of the token that the migration is designed to replace.
For Binance Alpha holders, the question is no longer just the token's price — it is whether their legitimate holdings will actually be recognized in the migration.
$Nes
Binance Alpha’s Stranded NES Holders
Nesa’s exploit and subsequent migration have left a major question for Binance Alpha NES holders: what happens to the tokens they bought on the old BSC contract?
Binance Alpha was the first platform to feature NES, giving its users direct access to the token.
But after the exploit, Nesa moved toward a new token structure, leaving holders of the old BSC NES in an uncertain position. Without a clear migration mechanism, these tokens risk becoming effectively worthless, even though holders acquired them legitimately.
The frustrating part is simple: the holders didn't exploit anything. They bought NES normally, yet they could be left holding the version of the token that the migration is designed to replace.
For Binance Alpha holders, the question is no longer just the token's price — it is whether their legitimate holdings will actually be recognized in the migration.
Nesa’s exploit and subsequent migration have left a major question for Binance Alpha NES holders: what happens to the tokens they bought on the old BSC contract?
Binance Alpha was the first platform to feature NES, giving its users direct access to the token.
But after the exploit, Nesa moved toward a new token structure, leaving holders of the old BSC NES in an uncertain position. Without a clear migration mechanism, these tokens risk becoming effectively worthless, even though holders acquired them legitimately.
The frustrating part is simple: the holders didn't exploit anything. They bought NES normally, yet they could be left holding the version of the token that the migration is designed to replace.
For Binance Alpha holders, the question is no longer just the token's price — it is whether their legitimate holdings will actually be recognized in the migration.
36
·
--
本人確認中
翻訳参照
Binance Alpha’s Stranded NES Holders
Nesa’s exploit and subsequent migration have left a major question for Binance Alpha NES holders: what happens to the tokens they bought on the old BSC contract?
Binance Alpha was the first platform to feature NES, giving its users direct access to the token.
But after the exploit, Nesa moved toward a new token structure, leaving holders of the old BSC NES in an uncertain position. Without a clear migration mechanism, these tokens risk becoming effectively worthless, even though holders acquired them legitimately.
The frustrating part is simple: the holders didn't exploit anything. They bought NES normally, yet they could be left holding the version of the token that the migration is designed to replace.
For Binance Alpha holders, the question is no longer just the token's price — it is whether their legitimate holdings will actually be recognized in the migration.$NES $MARSCOIN
Binance Alpha’s Stranded NES Holders
Nesa’s exploit and subsequent migration have left a major question for Binance Alpha NES holders: what happens to the tokens they bought on the old BSC contract?
Binance Alpha was the first platform to feature NES, giving its users direct access to the token.
But after the exploit, Nesa moved toward a new token structure, leaving holders of the old BSC NES in an uncertain position. Without a clear migration mechanism, these tokens risk becoming effectively worthless, even though holders acquired them legitimately.
The frustrating part is simple: the holders didn't exploit anything. They bought NES normally, yet they could be left holding the version of the token that the migration is designed to replace.
For Binance Alpha holders, the question is no longer just the token's price — it is whether their legitimate holdings will actually be recognized in the migration.$NES $MARSCOIN
Nesa’s exploit and subsequent migration have left a major question for Binance Alpha NES holders: what happens to the tokens they bought on the old BSC contract?
Binance Alpha was the first platform to feature NES, giving its users direct access to the token.
But after the exploit, Nesa moved toward a new token structure, leaving holders of the old BSC NES in an uncertain position. Without a clear migration mechanism, these tokens risk becoming effectively worthless, even though holders acquired them legitimately.
The frustrating part is simple: the holders didn't exploit anything. They bought NES normally, yet they could be left holding the version of the token that the migration is designed to replace.
For Binance Alpha holders, the question is no longer just the token's price — it is whether their legitimate holdings will actually be recognized in the migration.$NES $MARSCOIN
1
576
·
--
翻訳参照
If you bought $NES on binance alpha.You cannot sell like in other exchanges.You have been given an opportunity to see your hard earned money go to zero and completely disappear !!!
If you bought $NES on binance alpha.You cannot sell like in other exchanges.You have been given an opportunity to see your hard earned money go to zero and completely disappear !!!
1
3
452
·
--
翻訳参照
$NES Welcome to binance rug!!!
we got rugged not by meme but a genuine binance alpha token with binance investment!!!
$NES Welcome to binance rug!!!
we got rugged not by meme but a genuine binance alpha token with binance investment!!!
we got rugged not by meme but a genuine binance alpha token with binance investment!!!
1
·
--
翻訳参照
$NES Going to zero.The team packed up their bags and left
If you hold $nes in spot on other exchanges sell immediately and forget about it,No miracle is coming
$NES Going to zero.The team packed up their bags and left
If you hold $nes in spot on other exchanges sell immediately and forget about it,No miracle is coming
If you hold $nes in spot on other exchanges sell immediately and forget about it,No miracle is coming
5
3
922
·
--
$NES ソフトウェアの不具合は1日未満で、コミュニケーションは人々の安心のために2日未満で行われます。ここに希望を留めないでください。自分で判断して悪い選択をしたのなら、それを認めて先へ進みましょう。
$NES ソフトウェアの不具合は1日未満で、コミュニケーションは人々の安心のために2日未満で行われます。ここに希望を留めないでください。自分で判断して悪い選択をしたのなら、それを認めて先へ進みましょう。
1
1.2k
·
--
翻訳参照
$NES I belive 100% $nes is dead.Nothing good is coming
$NES I belive 100% $nes is dead.Nothing good is coming
1
455
·
--
翻訳参照
$NES it's all over.if you hold funds in spot in other exchanges please sell and save yourself the trauma
$NES it's all over.if you hold funds in spot in other exchanges please sell and save yourself the trauma
256
ログインして、さらにコンテンツを読む
厳選トピックで世界の暗号資産トレーダーの仲間入り
⚡️ 暗号資産に関する最新かつ有益な情報が見つかります。
💬 世界最大の暗号資産取引所から信頼されています。
👍 認証を受けたクリエイターから、有益なインサイトを得られます。
メール / 電話番号
トレンドトピック
FortitudeRaisesCreditLineTo$50M
閲覧回数 180
34人が討論中
#FortitudeRaisesCreditLineTo$50M
我慢（Fortitude）が信用枠を拡大し5,000万ドルへ――ZEC資金調達の詳細が重要
Fortitude Miningは、親会社Digital Currency Groupとの信用枠を2,600万ドルから5,000万ドルに拡大しました。今回の修正ではコミットメントに2,400万ドルを追加し、ファシリティの条件に従って借り入れ可能額はおよそ3,100万ドル残る見込みです。
Fortitudeは残りの利用可能枠がZECで調達されることを見込み、採掘用の機器、施設、拡張の資金に充てるためにそれらのトークンを売却する計画です。ローンは引き続き米ドル建てで、米ドルで返済されます。
9,000台のマイニングマシン向けにこれまで発表されている受注の支払いを支援するため、9月末までに約700万ドルが引き出される見込みです。
見解：これは、インフラ投資とトークン売却の可能性を結びつけています。追加の資金があればマシンの稼働開始につながり得ますが、ZECを売却することによる市場への影響は、タイミング、実行、利用可能な流動性次第です。
検証ポイントは、新しい能力によって生み出されるキャッシュフローが、機器・電力・融資コストを正当化するだけのものになるかどうかです。借入上限の引き上げを収益性改善の証拠として扱う前に、実際の引き出し状況、導入のマイルストーン、営業マージンを注視したいところです。
ZEC保有者にとっては、資本投入のタイミングとトークン売却が、この資金調達がどのように市場活動へつながるかを説明する手がかりになります。
では、ZECにとってここでより重要なのは何でしょう――採掘の拡大か、それとも計画されているトークン売却の管理方法か？
#zcash #CryptoMining
$ZEC $NOM $LSK
Blockchain Boss X
·いいね：0件
·閲覧回数 262
USWeighsPromotingDollarStablecoinsAbroad
閲覧回数 5,804
409人が討論中
US10YTreasuryYieldHits19YearHigh
閲覧回数 5,057
324人が討論中