三月 - M A R C H

I don't want to discuss about Dusk trade either duskEVM anymore. I feel it's useless.

Not only this campaign but several campaign backwards.

Nothing really change in creatorpad.

I thought we are supposed to be fair. Building community, learn and research fairly. But its nonsense.

Creatorpad is an events to shows how great you are manipulating rules and algorithm to win.

Most of people win Use AI generated content more than 30% in Dusk. Even most previous campaign. Bots system to boost fake views. 3rd app to boost views. But the actual users here on square was not really reached.

I was excited at first. Looking on dusk whitepaper. Looking the documents. Waiting their x for update.. checking their tokenomics and price action.. But now..

I am more than dissapointed.

Who do I think more dissapointed? @Dusk team. They gave airdrop for the community. But what they really want to achieve was not there.

They would rather making a trading competition about dusk or airdrop as duskevm mainnet rather than donating dusk token to a cheater.

Alas its help $DUSK token got a volume.

Yes. Creatorpad taught us to be a cheater.

Should we blame who those spamming comments and like for views?? Not really. They appear because system flaws and system allows it. I thought they will be banned. But its only a warning🤣

Its not matter if I lose with a genuine content. So I can learn how to write better. But against a cheater??

Nor algorithm and scoring rubrics work for a genuine creator.

I do understand now why big creator with 100k+ followers stop doing creatorpad. It ruined their health account. Compete with a cheater was not a thing. When you already there even before the creatorpad was.

Its already the 2nd #dusk creatorpad here on square. From last 2-3 month how many campaign that was. loopholes coming again and again.

Should I trust my money to largest crypto exchange in the world if they can't even handle cheaters on their own systems??
@Binance Square Official

Guys listen... i want to discuss something about DUSK that lot of people missing.

Validator.

"more validator more secure". I think this logic is pretty common in cryptocurrency.

Algorand has 2000 validators for security. And... it's work!

But DUSK?? only 67 validator per step🤔🤔

Me belike: Are you good @Dusk ??🤣🤣

But it turns on pretty comprehensive.

Dusk consensus named succinct attestation. The committee pick by deterministic algorithm sortition.

Purpose?? To make sure finality voting between node only takes second.

I was stunned like. . . . Second??

So with 67 validators and second finality dusk can have same level security with another chain network.

It is like saying sayonara to old system.

lot of crypto project talking about efficiency, privacy and security. I'm really sick with it to be honest.

But maybe... Just maybe.. I'm gonna look on dusk. How this kind of validators system works.

Are they gonna brings more volume to dusk token??

Let's see it in the future🤭🤭
#dusk $DUSK

$SOL back to $100🥶🥶🥶

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
最近のバタバタした仕事のあと家に向かう途中、Duskのドキュメントを調べながら考え事をしていたら、あるものにぶつかって――正直、思わず一瞬スクロールを止めました。
彼らの一連のマルチレイヤーアーキテクチャへの移行の背景で、ずっと同じ名前が出てきたんです。Lumos。…思わず「この人は誰なんだろう」と考えてしまって。聞いたことがない。そしてこれは単なるサブタスクじゃない。DuskDSとDuskEVMの間をつなぐ“橋”を作っているのが彼らで、さらにDEXなどのスターターアプリも、この先のエコシステム全体の土台になるはずです。
調べてみると、なんと同じチームが、Duskが標準のゴシッププロトコルを置き換えるために作ったカスタム・ネットワーキング・プロトコルKadcastの監査も担当していたことが分かりました。つまり、巨額の資金が入ってきた瞬間に現れた“新参”ではありません。もう前からそこにいたのに、大手の監査法人みたいにマーケ資料の目立つところへ名前がベタっと貼られていなかっただけなんです。
そこで、暗号界であまり見かけないものを感じました。皆さんはduskdsとduskevmを試したことありますか？