The SEC has formally placed three crypto rulemaking items on its 2026 regulatory agenda, according to the Agency Rule List, covering the offer and sale of crypto assets, broker-dealer financial responsibility rules, and Exchange Act amendments for crypto trading on alternative venues. The moves signal a Commission that is building a structured exemptive regime in parallel with Congress, rather than waiting for legislation to force its hand. Source: SEC That distinction matters. The CLARITY Act remains unsigned as of early July. The SEC’s decision to queue its own rulemakings now, compresses the timeline for market participants who assumed the regulatory overhaul would arrive via statute first. Three Items, Three Distinct Market Implications The first item addresses how crypto assets are offered and sold, and explicitly contemplates certain exemptions and safe harbor provisions. The SEC has already proposed an innovation exemption allowing firms to issue and trade tokenized securities, specifically tokenized U.S. stocks, and that guidance is likely to fall under this rulemaking bucket. Chair Paul Atkins has framed the broader agenda as embracing innovation, bringing more products onshore, and providing clarity regarding tokenized securities. For token issuers currently navigating registration ambiguity, a codified safe harbor is the most commercially significant item on the agenda. It determines whether a project can sell tokens to U.S. retail participants at all, and under what disclosure conditions. The specifics, thresholds, timelines, and the definition of sufficiently decentralized governance remain unresolved, which is precisely why the rulemaking notice is consequential. Photo: Paul Atkins The second item targets broker-dealer financial responsibility rules: specifically, Rules 15c3-1 (net capital), 15c3-3 (customer protection), 17a-3, and 17a-4 (books and records), with amendments proposed to address how these apply to crypto assets. The SEC had previously outlined conditions allowing certain DeFi platforms to operate without registering as broker-dealers. The coming rulemaking could codify those conditions or tighten them, a distinction that will determine whether front-end interface providers and aggregators face full registration burdens or a narrower compliance path. The third item is a set of Exchange Act amendments covering crypto trading on ATSs and national securities exchanges. This is the market structure piece, the rules governing how venues operate, what disclosures they owe, and how order flow in crypto-asset securities is treated relative to traditional equities. An ATS operating in crypto currently sits in a compliance gray zone; amended Exchange Act rules would clarify whether existing ATS registration frameworks apply as-is or require a parallel crypto-specific track. Atkins’ Framing and the Political Context Chair Atkins, according to the primary source, highlighted the Commission’s effort to embrace innovation, bring more products onshore, create clear rules for capital raising within the crypto ecosystem, and provide clarity regarding tokenized securities, framing all three items as part of delivering on President Trump’s goal to make the U.S. the world’s crypto capital. That framing is politically deliberate: it ties the SEC’s rulemaking pace directly to an executive mandate, which insulates the agenda from internal resistance and signals to institutional market participants that the direction is durable. President Trump, at the official kickoff of Trump accounts, stated he was a big fan of crypto and suggested Bitcoin could eventually be included in those accounts. The political tailwind behind the crypto regulation overhaul is not ambiguous, but political will and regulatory execution are separate variables, and the SEC’s agenda items are proposals, not final rules. The post SEC’s 2026 Crypto Rulemaking Plan: Safe Harbors, Broker-Dealer Rules and ATS Amendments appeared first on Cryptonews.
Eric Trump Doubles Down on Crypto as American Bitcoin Amasses 8,000 BTC
American Bitcoin Corp. has surpassed 8,000 BTC, worth $502 million at current prices. Eric Trump announced the milestone on X, saying the crypto company will keep stacking Bitcoin. That stash now places American Bitcoin among the world’s largest corporate holders, moving ahead of several well-known crypto firms. Corporate buyers keep scooping up coins even as traders wait for Bitcoin to pick a direction. Wall Street may love earnings season, but Bitcoin seems more interested in balance sheets. Thrilled to announce American Bitcoin crossing the 8,000 BTC mark! Even with crypto market volatility, I want to reiterate how we continue to differentiate ourselves, mining at a 52% profit margin in Q1 and continually adding to our treasury, all while maintaining one of the… pic.twitter.com/u7KWeaUjYO — Eric Trump (@EricTrump) July 7, 2026 The Trump family’s linked company’s strategy stands out because it mines Bitcoin while steadily adding to its treasury. It also reported a 52% mining margin in the first quarter and maintained lean operating costs. While many public miners sold Bitcoin after the halving to cover expenses, American Bitcoin kept filling the vault instead. Still, buying headlines alone does not guarantee higher prices. Bitcoin has struggled to build momentum, leaving traders caught between steady corporate demand and cautious market sentiment. For now, accumulation offers support, but the chart still needs to prove it can carry the next leg higher. Discover: The Best Token Presales Can Bitcoin Price Break $65,000 with the Help of Trump, The Crypto President? Bitcoin has settled into a tighter range, trading between roughly $62,800 and $63,200 over the past day. Its market value stands near $1.26 trillion, with just over 20 million BTC in circulation. For now, traders seem happy to watch instead of chase. Even Bitcoin deserves a coffee break sometimes. The bigger picture still favors caution after Bitcoin confirmed a breakdown from its multi month symmetrical triangle. Price briefly slipped below $60,000 before snapping back, triggering heavy liquidations that mostly wiped out leveraged longs. That flush cleared out crowded positions, but it did not erase the technical damage. Now, the $60,000 to $61,000 area remains the first line of defense. Meanwhile, the mid $60,000 region has flipped into resistance after acting as support for weeks. Buyers have shown up where it matters, yet they still need enough momentum to push through overhead selling. Bitcoin (BTC) 24h7d30d1yAll time Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit If Bitcoin climbs back above $65,000 with strong volume, short covering could fuel another rally. Otherwise, a sideways stretch between $61,000 and $65,000 remains the most likely path. However, a weekly close below $60,000 would strengthen the bearish case and shift attention toward the $57,000 to $58,000 zone. Mining difficulty fell by about 10% in early June, marking its second notable drop this year. At the same time, traders continue watching large institutional wallet movements, including a transfer of about 2,700 BTC linked to BlackRock. Those flows may offer clues, but price still gets the final vote. Still, Trump and his influence on crypto could pump Bitcoin at any second. Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio Bitcoin Hyper Eyes Early-Stage Entry While BTC Works Through Resistance Traders positioned in spot BTC near $63,000 are looking at a ceiling, not a clear runway. The triangle breakdown means any push toward previous highs above $120,000 requires a full technical reset first, and that takes time. That gap between the current price structure and upside potential is exactly where early-stage infrastructure plays tend to attract attention. Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is positioning as the first Bitcoin Layer 2 with Solana Virtual Machine integration with sub-Solana latency on top of Bitcoin’s security layer. The presale has raised $33 million at a current price of $0.0136, with staking already live. Bitcoin (BTC) 24h7d30d1yAll time The core pitch: Bitcoin’s programmability problem gets solved without abandoning Bitcoin’s trust model. Decentralized canonical bridge for BTC transfers, high-speed smart contract execution, and low fees. For readers who want to dig into the mechanics, the full breakdown is available at the Bitcoin Hyper presale page. The post Eric Trump Doubles Down on Crypto as American Bitcoin Amasses 8,000 BTC appeared first on Cryptonews.
Funds Never Held: GhostSwap’s Non-Custodial Model vs the 2026 Hack Wave
Hacks have always been part of crypto, but in 2026, it does look like we are noticing more and more of them, especially on custodial platforms. This year alone there has been hundreds of millions of dollars drained from exchanges, bridges, and protocols that hold user funds in centralized wallets. As crypto news “scream” about the latest hacks, a quieter, more resilient model continues to operate without making the news: non-custodial swaps. GhostSwap is a non-custodial crypto exchange where funds are never in a shared pool waiting to be drained. Instead, assets route directly from the user’s wallet to the destination address, which drastically reduces the attack surface compared to traditional custodial platforms. Curious to understand what this actually means? Bear with us, please. The 2026 Custodial Hack Wave The numbers regarding crypto hacks this year are worrying, to say the least. In the first four months of 2026 alone, custodial platforms lost over $670 million to hacks and exploits. Here are some of the most biggest incidents: KelpDAO suffered a $292 million loss on April 18, 2026, through an infrastructure attack via the LayerZero bridge. The custodial bridge/L2 platform proved vulnerable to a single point of failure in its cross-chain infrastructure. Drift Protocol (which is basically a custodial perpetuals exchange on Solana) lost $285 million on April 1, 2026, through a combination of smart contract vulnerability and compromised admin keys. The attack exposed the risks of relying on centralized administrative controls. Grinex, a custodial CEX operating in Kyrgyzstan with Russian links, had $13.7 million in USDT drained from 54 wallets on April 15, 2026. The attack showed that even smaller exchanges with less visibility are prime targets. Step Finance lost $28.9 million between January and February 2026 through compromised executive email accounts and private keys. That breach is particularly interesting since it shows how even human factors (such as email access, or credential management) remain critical vulnerabilities. Truebit Protocol suffered a $26.4 million exploit on January 9, 2026, through “zombie code” in its smart contracts; a reminder that legacy code can become a ticking time bomb. ResolvLabs, a custodial stablecoin issuer, lost $25 million in March 2026 through an AWS KMS key management vulnerability. Even infrastructure giants like Amazon aren’t immune to configuration errors. If a series of news about hundreds of millions in losses doesn’t make you think twice about keeping your assets on a custodial exchange, then honestly, what will? This is where GhostSwap comes into play. Why the Attack Surface Is Smaller with GhostSwap GhostSwap’s non-custodial model doesn’t claim to be unhackable. To be completely honest, no system is in crypto. However, it drastically reduces the attack surface by eliminating several high-value targets that attackers typically go after. In a custodial exchange, users deposit assets into exchange-controlled wallets. This creates large, tempting pools of customer funds. GhostSwap operates differently: funds move through the swap process and are delivered directly to the destination wallet rather than being stored as long-term customer balances. No Accounts Means No Account Database to Breach There’s no honey pot waiting to be drained. Traditional exchanges maintain extensive databases of user accounts, login credentials, and often identity records. This creates multiple attack vectors: credential stuffing, password theft, and account takeovers. GhostSwap’s no-account approach removes entire categories of risk. There is no user database to breach, no login system to compromise, and no credentials to steal. Minimal Personal Data Reduces Exposure Because GhostSwap doesn’t require routine account creation or standard KYC processes for most swaps, there is far less sensitive user information available to steal. The platform follows a data-minimization strategy, which collects only what’s necessary to complete a swap. This means even if an attacker were to breach GhostSwap’s systems, there would be little valuable personal data to exfiltrate. No Large Customer-Fund Pool to Drain Perhaps the biggest and most significant difference is the absence of a centralized pool of customer assets. GhostSwap’s wallet-to-wallet swap model avoids maintaining a shared pool that could be drained in a single compromise. When you compare this to custodial platforms, it’s pretty clear even to a newbie that a single successful attack can empty millions from a single wallet. GhostSwap’s model distributes risk across individual transactions, and eliminates the giant target. The Refund-Address Safety Mechanism A key operational safeguard in GhostSwap’s model is the refund address. During a swap, users provide both: A destination address where they want to receive the output asset A refund address where the original funds can be returned if the swap cannot be completed This dual-address system provides a critical safety net. If a transaction encounters a problem (such as a routing issue, liquidity problem, or another failure condition) the refund address gives GhostSwap a predefined destination for returning funds when possible. This reduces the risk of assets becoming stranded during an incomplete swap and provides a clear recovery path. It’s a simple but very effective mechanism. Rather than user funds remaining in limbo while support teams investigate, the refund address enables automated recovery. The asset has a defined path home. GhostSwap Offers High-Standard Security So, let’s conclude with this – Imagine waking up to check your portfolio, only to discover that the exchange where you kept your funds has been drained overnight. This happened to thousands of traders in 2026, so it’s not hypothetical. When Drift Protocol lost $285 million on April 1, traders who had funds on the platform couldn’t access their assets for days. When KelpDAO lost $293 million just weeks later, many users watched their holdings vanish with no clear path to recovery. Traders who use GhostSwap avoid this entire category of risk. Your funds move directly from your wallet to the swap route and land in your destination wallet; never held in a GhostSwap-controlled pool where they could be swept away in a single attack. When you hear about the next custodial breach, and there will be a next one, you won’t have to panic about whether your funds were caught in the crossfire. This peace of mind isn’t just theoretical anymore. In a year where over $670 million has been stolen from custodial platforms in the first four months alone, GhostSwap’s non-custodial model has proven its value by simply not appearing in the hack news. Traders who value their assets and their sleep are increasingly turning to non-custodial swaps, not just for privacy, but for the security of knowing their funds are never held by the platform they’re trading on. GhostSwap’s non-custodial model doesn’t eliminate all risk, but it does reduce the chance for the hack to happen. When there’s no honey pot, there’s less honey to steal. The post Funds Never Held: GhostSwap’s Non-Custodial Model vs the 2026 Hack Wave appeared first on Cryptonews.
CLARITY法案は、7月1日に全米黒人法執行官協会(NOBLE)が同法案を正式に支持したことで、最初の主要な公的な法執行機関の支持を獲得しました。そしてその2日後、全米郡保安官協会(Major County Sheriffs of America)が反対を完全に撤回し、中立へと方針を転換しました。 72時間以内に同じデジタル資産に関する法案について、建設的に動く2つの組織化された法執行機関の動きは偶然ではありません。意図的な働きかけを示しており、上院の本会議での争いが、形式的な手続きではなく、現在進行中の交渉になったことを意味します。
SEC Drops MetaMask Case Against ConsenSys With No Fine or Wrongdoing
The SEC has closed its enforcement investigation into ConsenSys over MetaMask Swaps and MetaMask Staking, with no fine and no admission of wrongdoing, a result that directly challenges the regulatory theory that non-custodial wallet interfaces constitute unregistered brokerage operations. The dismissal removes the most immediate enforcement threat against the primary retail gateway into the Ethereum ecosystem and hands wallet developers a defensible precedent heading into what remains an unsettled legal landscape for DeFi regulation. The SEC filed its original complaint in June 2024, alleging that ConsenSys had brokered transactions in crypto asset securities since at least October 2020 and collected transaction-based compensation through MetaMask’s integrated services. I'm pleased to announce that Consensys and the SEC have agreed in principle that the securities enforcement case concerning MetaMask should be dismissed. Subject to the approval of the Commission, the SEC will file a stipulation with the court that effectively closes the case.… — Joseph Lubin (@ethereumJoseph) February 27, 2025 The agency’s staking theory went further, targeting MetaMask’s routing integrations with Lido and Rocket Pool as unregistered securities offerings, a framing that, if upheld, would have forced wallet developers across the ecosystem to gut core functionality from non-custodial interfaces. ConsenSys had pre-empted the suit with its own action against the SEC in April 2024, challenging the agency’s authority over Ethereum-related software and its attempted classification of Ethereum as a security. The SEC separately closed its Ethereum 2.0 probe in June 2024, and a federal court dismissed ConsenSys’ Texas suit in September 2024, ruling the SEC’s parallel enforcement action had already reduced any credible prosecution threat. That sequence effectively narrowed the live dispute to the MetaMask case now resolved. Discover: The Best Token Presales Joe Lubin Calls Dismissal a Win for Blockchain Software Developers ConsenSys founder Joe Lubin announced the resolution, saying the company and the SEC had agreed in principle that the securities enforcement case concerning MetaMask should be dismissed. Lubin described the outcome as “a good step for blockchain software developers,” adding that ConsenSys had been “committed to fighting this suit until the bitter end.” “I’m pleased to announce that Consensys and the SEC have agreed in principle that the securities enforcement case concerning MetaMask should be dismissed. Subject to the approval of the Commission, the SEC will file a stipulation with the court that effectively closes the case.” Photo: Joe Lubin A ConsenSys official confirmed to Bloomberg that the SEC would not impose a fine. The clean exit matters: ConsenSys’ core legal argument – that wallet software should not be regulated as a traditional broker simply because it routes users to protocols, has now effectively prevailed without requiring a court ruling that could have cut either way. Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio Why the Outcome Matters Beyond ConsenSys and Metamask MetaMask is not a peripheral product in the Ethereum stack. It is the dominant retail interface through which users reach DeFi protocols, NFT markets, liquid staking, and on-chain transactions, making the SEC’s original broker theory a structural threat to Ethereum’s entire user-access layer. A ruling that swap routing or staking integrations inside a non-custodial wallet trigger broker-dealer registration requirements would have had cascading implications for every wallet developer offering comparable functionality. That scenario is now off the table, at least in this enforcement cycle. The closure also fits the broader pattern of SEC crypto enforcement pullbacks under post-Gensler leadership, which has included dropped or paused actions against Gemini, Uniswap Labs, Robinhood Crypto, and OpenSea. This month, the SEC has dropped its cases against Coinbase, Robinhood, and now ConsenSys company behind Metamask. Maybe this panic selling won't last forever? — dubzy (@dubzyxbt) February 28, 2025 A legislative push for formal crypto regulatory clarity is running in parallel, and the SEC’s retreat on ConsenSys reinforces the direction of travel. Wallet developers and DeFi front ends now have a cleaner operating environment than they did six months ago – though the absence of a court ruling means the underlying legal questions on broker classification remain open for a future administration or enforcement wave to revisit. For Ethereum specifically, regulatory clarity at the wallet layer feeds directly into the ecosystem’s mainstreaming trajectory. Institutional staking inflows into Ethereum have been building through 2025, and a MetaMask enforcement loss would have introduced friction at exactly the point where retail and institutional demand converge. That particular risk is now resolved. Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit The post SEC Drops MetaMask Case Against ConsenSys With No Fine or Wrongdoing appeared first on Cryptonews.
Solana News: Solana Hits $5.77B Tokenized Asset Volume in Q2 2026 All-Time High
Solana News: SOL closed Q2 2026 with $5.77 billion in tokenized asset spot volume, a quarterly all-time high confirmed by data analyst Sam Schubert on July 1, a figure that exceeds the entire $775 million generated across the second half of 2025 by more than seven times. The result cements Solana’s position as the dominant settlement layer for on-chain equities and signals a structural shift in how institutional capital is moving on-chain through tokenization. Solana (SOL) 24h7d30d1yAll time Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio Solana News: Raydium Leads as On-Chain Volume Breaks Records Across June Raydium emerged as the primary venue for tokenized equities on Solana throughout the quarter, with its own announcement on July 1 describing it as “the #1 venue for tokenized asset spot volume on Solana.” The protocol’s concentrated liquidity pools host the majority of xStocks trading pairs, and the final billion in Raydium’s cumulative tokenized equity volume was added in a single month, a pace that directly shaped the quarter’s headline figure. The quarter’s peak months were heavily weighted toward June. Solana processed $1.298 billion of the $1.324 billion in global weekly tokenized stock volume during the week of June 15–21, a 95% share. On June 24, daily tokenized equities trading hit a $644 million record, surpassing memecoins as a share of Solana spot volume for the first time. Source: Blockworks June alone generated over $2 billion in monthly tokenized stock volume, the highest figure ever recorded for any single month on any chain. The final week of Q2 set a weekly all-time high of $1.42 billion before Schubert published the full quarterly tally. That weekly figure alone exceeds several prior monthly totals, illustrating how compressed the acceleration was into the quarter’s close. Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit Solana’s 97% RWA Market Share Reflects Structural, Not Cyclical, Dominance The Solana Foundation’s May 2026 ecosystem roundup placed Solana’s share of cumulative on-chain tokenized equity spot trading volume at 97%, a figure that had been building for over a year before the Q2 breakout. Data, noted Solana’s tokenized equity lead had held for 54 consecutive weeks. The chain’s sub-second finality and low per-transaction fees are the structural reasons liquidity has concentrated here rather than on Ethereum or competing L1S. The broader RWA picture on Solana supports that reading. The May 2026 roundup also reported $2.8 billion-plus in total RWA value on-chain and $1.2 billion in RWA lending deposits, a context that explains why BlackRock deployed a $255 million institutional liquidity fund on Solana and Ondo holds $176 million in tokenized yield exposure on the network. These are not speculative positions; they represent regulated capital seeking the execution quality that DeFi infrastructure on Solana now provides at scale. Cross-chain monthly tokenized equity trading hit $5.3 billion in May 2026, up 44% from April per Crypto Briefing – and Solana accounted for the overwhelming majority of that figure. The remaining chains are not closing the gap. As Solana continues to mature its on-chain governance and network infrastructure, the pipeline of new tokenized equities, SPYx, QQQx, NVDAx, and additional xStocks instruments points to further volume concentration rather than dispersion. Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit What Raydium Targets After the Q2 Record 0xINFRA, a member of Raydium’s leadership roster, framed Q2’s achievement as a foundation rather than an endpoint: “The focus for Q2 shifts from resilience to conversion: broadening LaunchLab distribution beyond concentrated partner channels, sustaining CLMM-led liquidity depth, and translating tokenized-asset share gains into repeatable monetization.” 0xINFRA said. The protocol views volume share as a prerequisite, not the goal; fee generation and sustainable liquidity depth are the next tests. The regulatory backdrop matters here. Bitwise has argued that the passage of the U.S. CLARITY Act news would accelerate the tokenization wave and position Solana as one of the primary beneficiaries. That legislation remains pending, but the market is not waiting for it – $5.77 billion in Q2 on-chain volume happened before any such framework existed. If CLARITY passes, the addressable market for tokenized stocks expands materially, and Raydium’s current infrastructure advantage compounds. Solana price forecasts for the remainder of 2026 increasingly treat this RWA momentum as a primary input rather than a secondary narrative. Discover: The Best Token Presales The post Solana News: Solana Hits $5.77B Tokenized Asset Volume in Q2 2026 All-Time High appeared first on Cryptonews.