CryptonewsCom

The U.S. asset management firm WisdomTree just expanded users’ access to its portfolio of tokenized funds to the Solana blockchain.

As more Wall Street firms like this start to embrace the network, this adds fuel to bullish Solana price predictions.

WisdomTree’s decision reflects growing interest in Solana’s low transaction costs and high settlement speeds.

WisdomTree tokenized funds are now live on @Solana

WisdomTree Prime and Connect users can access regulated money market, equity, fixed income, and multi-asset funds natively on Solana, with the ability to hold them in self-custody wallets.

Read the Press Release:… pic.twitter.com/sgmolzWsZK

— WisdomTree Prime® (@WisdomTreePrime) January 28, 2026

Users will now be able to use their Solana-based USDC tokens to buy WisdomTree’s tokenized funds through the firm’s Connect and Prime solutions.

Solana is already an important player in the real-world assets (RWAs) market. Data from RWA.syz indicates that the network has $1.3 billion in assets at the time of writing. This makes it the fourth-largest blockchain in this segment with a 5.6% market share.

As network adoption accelerates among big players on Wall Street, demand for SOL could surge – how high can Solana go?

Solana Price Prediction: SOL Breaks Out of Price Channel – $145 Next?

Solana recently broke out of a bullish falling channel pattern and faced resistance at the $128 level.

It now looks ready to retest the channel’s upper bound to see where it goes next.

Source: TradingView

The $120 level is the key support to watch at the time. This has been a strong demand zone in the past few days.

The 4-hour chart shows that momentum has stalled for the time being, as the Relative Strength Index (RSI) has dived below the signal line.

If we get a strong bounce off $120, SOL could easily rally to $130 first and then to $145 if positive momentum gains traction.

Paired with positive news on the institutional front, this could set the stage for a broader recovery in the mid-term for SOL.

Meanwhile, Wall Street’s growing interest in blockchain technology benefits top crypto presales like SUBBD ($SUBBD). SUBBD leverages the power of AI to create new revenue streams for content creators who use its top-notch decentralized platform.

SUBBD Presale Lets Users Make Money with AI Characters and Crypto

The content creation industry is shifting, but creators are still held back by high fees, strict rules, and fragmented tools.

SUBBD ($SUBBD) is changing the landscape by launching an all-in-one platform where Web3 meets AI.

Instead of jumping between different apps to generate, edit, and post videos, creators can now manage their entire workflow in one place.

This ecosystem even allows users to mint and monetize AI influencer personas, creating brand new ways to earn in the digital economy.

At the heart of this revolution is the $SUBBD token, which simplifies everything from subscriptions to governance.

The project has already experienced a strong wave of positive momentum, with over $1.2 million raised as it taps into a network of 2,000 creators and 250 million fans.

To join the $SUBBD presale, visit the official website and connect a wallet like Best Wallet.

You can swap ETH or USDT, or use a bank card to get your tokens in seconds.

Visit the Official SUBBD Website Here

The post Solana Price Prediction: Wall Street Just Moved Billions Onto SOL – Is This the Most Bullish News of the Year? appeared first on Cryptonews.

ハイパーリキッドの価格は過去1時間で5％下落し、暗号市場の総時価総額が3.054兆ドルに減少する中で、33.84ドルへのジャンプがありました。

暗号通貨の価格全体が苦戦し続ける中（株式市場が上昇しているにもかかわらず）、ハイパーリキッドは最近、他の主要コインよりもはるかに好成績を収め、1週間で50％の印象的な上昇を記録し、1年で42％の増加を達成しました。

これは、ハイパーリキッドがレイヤー1ネットワークとして安定した成長を遂げ、トークン化の採用により総ロック価値が15億ドルに達したことから派生しています。

The U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee voted by a narrow margin to advance its own proposal of the long-awaited crypto market structure bill, bringing the overall CLARITY Act process a step further toward a full Senate test.

Under Chairman @JohnBoozman’s leadership, the Senate Ag Committee advanced crypto market structure legislation. This is a big move for consumer protection and innovation. pic.twitter.com/w0KpL2WXWM

— Senate Ag Committee Republicans (@SenateAgGOP) January 29, 2026

After a markup session that lasted a little more than an hour, the committee voted on the bill, 12–11, in a party-line vote.

The amendments put forward were all voted down, mostly along partisan lines.

Clarity Bill Draws Lines Between the SEC and CFTC

The bill is intended to shift the U.S. crypto regulations from an enforcement-first model to more explicit statutory guidelines.

It would have the Commodity Futures Trading Commission with primary supervision over digital commodity spot markets of digital commodities like Bitcoin and Ethereum, but leave the Securities and Exchange Commission the authority to regulate the sale of digital assets as investment contracts.

Proponents state that the bill would make clear which regulator regulates what, create registration rules on intermediaries, and add protection of consumers, such as asset segregation and disclosure rules.

HAPPENING NOW: The @SenateAg Committee is convening to mark up its portion of the CLARITY Act, with Chairman @JohnBoozman kicking off proceedings. He says the markup is the culmination of months of bipartisan work and that while conversations were cordial and substantive,… pic.twitter.com/BgDDu0JlkM

— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) January 29, 2026

Throughout the markup, the Democrats insisted on ethics provisions and increased engagement among the parties.

Senator Cory Booker said legislators could not afford to develop rules to criminalize software writing by mistake, yet self-custody and open-source codes were necessary components of a viable scheme.

Booker also complained that the current version of the draft was not quite the same as a bipartisan version to be negotiated with Committee Chairman John Boozman at the end of last year, blaming political pressure and White House involvement for complicating talks.

A number of amendments directed towards ethical issues did not take off.

A motion to prohibit elected officeholders from possessing or making money on digital property during their term was suggested by Senator Michael Bennet and was voted down 12-11.

A provision proposed by Senator Dick Durbin seeks to prevent federal agencies from providing financial assistance to crypto intermediaries that enter bankruptcy.

The same amendment was also turned down, as Boozman cites that the bill does not give authority to bailouts in the first place.

CLARITY Act Advances, but Final Senate Deal Remains Elusive

The vote of the partisan committee, however, is a milestone in a process of legislation that has spanned several congressional sessions.

With a supermajority vote of Republicans and Democrats in the House, its version of the CLARITY Act was passed in July 2025, but stalled once the bill got to the Senate.

U.S. Crypto Week pushes digital assets into the legislative spotlight as key bills and industry leaders shape the path toward regulation. #CryptoWeek #Regulationhttps://t.co/6lXm38TRNN

— Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) July 17, 2025

The committee that would review the legislation was divided between the Agriculture Committee and the Senate Banking Committee, and it was an indication of overlapping authority on commodities, securities, and financial institutions.

Even though the Agriculture Committee now has its version developed, the work in the Banking Committee is still pending.

A proposed markup in the early months of this year was delayed due to disagreements and industry opposition, including objections to the provisions on the basis of limiting yield on payment stablecoins.

Coinbase CEO @brian_armstrong said the exchange cannot support the Senate’s crypto bill as written, warning it would hurt tokenized equities, DeFi and privacy while weakening the CFTC.#Coinbase #CryptoPolicy https://t.co/kMbxepaWYk

— Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) January 15, 2026

Banking lawmakers must still finalize and approve their text before the two Senate versions can be merged into a single bill.

The next step will most probably conclude the fate of the bill since once the Senate committees have a consensus in their versions, the package will be taken to the Senate floor.

If the bill passed by the Senate is not the same as the House version, it would then be subject to a conference committee to resolve differences and sent back to both chambers to be voted on.

After the vote, it goes to the president, who can either sign, veto, or pocket-veto the bill.

The post U.S. Senate Advances Crypto Market Structure Bill – What’s Next CLARITY Act? appeared first on Cryptonews.

XRPは2026年末までに大きな動きを示唆するウォールストリートによる新しいXRP価格予測で、ブレイクアウトの年に向けて準備をしているかもしれません。

年が始まって以来、XRPは1.7%の上昇を記録し、現在$1.87で取引されています。

しかし、21Sharesによる新しいレポートでは、XRPの年末目標が$2.69まで高くなる可能性があり、モメンタムが加速すれば新しい過去最高値に近づく可能性があります。

ここに2026年の私たち自身のXRP予測があります：

ベースケース – $2.45 (50%)
ブルケース – $2.69 (30%)
ベアケース – $1.60 (-16%)

BTC価格が再び急落しており、今回は本当に$80,000に向かうかもしれません。執筆時点で、ビットコインは$89,500で取引されており、1日の下落率は4%です。

ビットコインは依然として弱い状態にあり、株式と金が新しい史上最高値を更新しています。XRPやイーサリアムのようなアルトコインはこの動きの乗客であり、2025年全体が厳しい後、ビットコインと共に苦しんでいます。以下は、2026年を通じて彼らの価格がどのようになるかです。

24時間7日間30日間1年間全期間

ビットコイン価格予測: あなたは本当にこんなに悪いことができないのですか？ $80,000が次かもしれません

Those expecting 2026 to mark a decisive breakthrough for mass crypto adoption may have to wait a little longer. That said, history shows that periods of low excitement often present the most attractive opportunities for investors positioning ahead of the next major bull cycle.

Following Coinbase’s decision to withdraw its support for the CLARITY Act, the Senate Banking Committee opted to postpone further discussion of the essential crypto bill for several weeks.

Despite the delay, comprehensive crypto regulation in the United States is inevitable. Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s share of the overall crypto market has been declining since summer, increasing the likelihood that altcoins such as XRP, Solana, and Dogecoin will drive the next bull run.

XRP (XRP): Payments-Focused Blockchain Sets Sights on $5 in Q2

XRP ($XRP), which carries a market capitalization of roughly $111 billion, remains one of the most established digital assets in global payments. It is known for fast settlement times and minimal transaction costs.

Ripple developed the XRP Ledger (XRPL) to offer banks and financial institutions a more efficient alternative to traditional systems like SWIFT, enabling near-instant cross-border transfers at a fraction of the cost.

The network has drawn interest from high-profile institutions, including the UN Capital Development Fund and the White House, strengthening XRP’s reputation as a serious contender in the evolution of global payment infrastructure.

After concluding its multi-year legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, XRP surged to a new all-time high (ATH) of $3.65 in mid-2025. A broader market downturn has led to a loss of around 50% since, with the token now trading near $1.83.

One of the most significant recent milestones has been the approval of spot XRP exchange-traded funds in the United States, giving both institutional and retail investors regulated access to the asset.

Additional ETF launches and greater regulatory clarity could act as key catalysts, potentially pushing XRP toward the $5 mark in the second quarter.

Solana (SOL): High-Performance Blockchain Aiming for a New Record High

Solana ($SOL) is one of the leading smart contract platforms in crypto. Its high transaction throughput and low fees have helped the network attract around $9.4 billion in total value locked, while SOL maintains a market capitalization near $74 billion.

The introduction of Solana spot ETFs by firms such as Grayscale and Bitwise has played a major role in bringing the asset to traditional finance investors.

Currently trading around $119, SOL sits below its 30-day moving average with a very low relative strength index (RSI) reading of 36, indicating heavy selling. This setup often precedes a sharp upward recovery. A bullish flag pattern that emerged in late 2026 suggests the potential for a renewed upside move.

A decisive breakout above resistance levels near $200 and $275 could pave the way for Solana to surpass its previous all-time high of $293.31 and potentially move beyond $300 before the end of the quarter.

Solana is a preferred blockchain for real-world asset tokenization, a use case that has drawn growing interest from institutions. Asset managers such as BlackRock and Franklin Templeton have already leveraged Solana to launch tokenized investment products.

Dogecoin (DOGE): Can the Doge Community Finally Push to $1?

Introduced in 2013, Dogecoin ($DOGE) holds the distinction of being the original and largest meme coin. Backed by one of crypto’s most dedicated communities, the project now boasts a market capitalization of approximately $20 billion.

DOGE’s meteoric rise during the 2021 bull market, amplified by endorsements from figures including Elon Musk, Snoop Dogg, and Gene Simmons, cemented its status as a cultural phenomenon.

Despite its humorous beginnings, Dogecoin’s size and liquidity help moderate the extreme price swings often seen in smaller meme tokens. As a result, DOGE frequently moves in tandem with major cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP.

“Dogecoin to $1” remains a popular slogan among supporters, though achieving that level by 2026 may prove challenging without meaningful progress on U.S. crypto regulation.

Under favorable market conditions, DOGE could rise from $0.12 to challenge its 2021 ATH of $0.7316 during a later stage of the bull market.

Adoption continues to expand gradually. Tesla accepts DOGE for select merchandise, and payment platforms including PayPal and Revolut now support Dogecoin transactions.

Bitcoin Hyper (HYPER): A Meme-Inspired Bitcoin Layer-2 With Bigger Ambitions

Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is a new Bitcoin Layer-2 project that will increase transaction speed, lower fees, and introduce smart contract functionality to the Bitcoin network.

The protocol is built on the Solana Virtual Machine and features decentralized governance alongside a Canonical Bridge that enables seamless Bitcoin transfers across multiple chains.

Its presale has already raised over $31.1 million, with some analysts forecasting potential returns of 10x to 100x once the token becomes publicly tradable. A recent audit by Coinsult reported no critical vulnerabilities in the project’s smart contracts.

The HYPER token underpins the ecosystem, serving as the medium for transaction fees, governance participation, and staking incentives.

Early participants can stake their presale tokens for yields of up to 38% APY, although rewards are designed to decrease as network participation grows.

With exchange listings anticipated later this year, Bitcoin Hyper’s presale offers early exposure to a project that could represent a new chapter in Bitcoin’s technological evolution.

Visit the official website or follow Bitcoin Hyper on X and Telegram for more information.

Visit the Official Website Here

The post Best Crypto to Buy Now January 29 – XRP, Solana, Dogecoin appeared first on Cryptonews.

巧妙に作成されたプロンプトに導かれると、AnthropicのAIモデルClaudeは、今後11か月間のXRP、Shiba Inu、Pepeの驚くべき価格予測を提供します。

モデルによれば、長期的な暗号市場のブル市場と、米国におけるより明確で好意的な規制政策が組み合わさることで、主要なデジタル資産が今後の数ヶ月で新たな史上最高値（ATH）に達する可能性があります。

さて、以下はClaude AIが今年予想外に強いパフォーマンスを示す可能性がある3つの暗号通貨についての見解です。

Shiba Inuのリード大使であるShytoshi Kusamaは、繁栄するエコシステムのための重要な要素がすでに整っている可能性があることを明らかにし、強気のShiba Inu価格予測に感謝しています。

エコシステムの現状についてXスレッドで比喩的に話す中で、Kusamaはミームコインを「数年かかった狂った難解なパズル」に例えました。

大きなパズルを始めたことはありますか？1000ピースのもののような？最初に何をすべきか知っていますよね、コーナーです。それがShib…残りのアウトライン—それはShib Bone Leash Treat Bad Shy Shifuなどです。さて、整いました。次は難しい部分、内部です。それがエコシステムです…

Worldcoinは主流の採用に向けて最大のステップを踏み出した可能性があり、OpenAIはWorldcoinの価格予測にとって強気の転換を示す生体認証技術を注視しています。

市場参加者は潜在的なパートナーシップの噂を買っており、水曜日の取引中にオルトコインを25%押し上げ、主流の採用に向けてポジショニングしています。

フォーブスの報道によると、AIの巨人はユーザーがAppleのFace IDまたはWorldcoinの虹彩スキャンを通じて「人格の証明」を提供する必要がある独自のソーシャルネットワークを構築しています。

今週、米国証券取引委員会と商品先物取引委員会のトップの公務員たちは、暗号規制に関する合意が高まっていることを示唆し、より一貫した規制が近づいている可能性があることを示しました。

ワシントンでの共同公の場に先立ち、CNBCに出演したSEC委員長ポール・アトキンズとCFTC委員長マイク・セリグは、法域と執行に基づく監視の明確さが欠如しているため、暗号の規制環境が転換点に近づいていると宣言しました。

ビットコインは約$85,289に滑り込み、木曜日に4.75%下落し、暗号市場全体で短期的なボラティリティを拡大させました。しかし、価格の反落の背後には、一連の構造的な展開があり、ビットコインの供給と需要のバランス、および投資家の信頼を再形成する可能性のある長期的な力を指し示しています。

崩壊を示すのではなく、この動きは規制の変化、新しいビットコインネイティブのDeFi活動、および再び企業が蓄積していることを反映しています。長期保有者にとって、これらの動態は単一の赤いキャンドルよりもはるかに重要です。

Capital runs are often described as moments of panic—irrational stampedes driven by fear, rumor, or herd behavior. This framing is comforting because it suggests failure is accidental and avoidable, the result of emotion rather than structure. History tells a different story. Capital runs are not breakdowns of rationality; they are acts of economic warfare. They occur when rational actors coordinate around a shared conclusion that a country or a system’s promises can no longer be defended. Long before laws change, defaults are declared, or regimes collapse, capital moves first. In financial conflict, movement is the decisive act.

Every monetary and financial system is a strategic construct. It rests on enforceable promises: convertibility, repayment, stability, or rule-based governance. Defending those promises requires reserves, credibility, and—above all—time. Challenging them requires only doubt, coordination, and speed. When obligations grow faster than defensive capacity, capital becomes a weapon. It probes weaknesses, applies pressure, and withdraws. What is often labeled “speculation” in neutral language is, in practice, the application of force against systems whose defenses are already strained.

Across history, a small class of economically powerful actors has played a recurring role in these conflicts. From ancient merchant networks and imperial reserve managers, to modern liquidity providers and advanced speculators, these actors do not usually create weakness. They recognize it early and act decisively. Their actions function as atomic accelerators—small, well-timed moves that trigger disproportionate systemic response. What appears sudden in hindsight is often the final phase of a campaign whose outcome was decided earlier, quietly, through shifts in behavior rather than public announcements.

Capital Runs as Structural Acts of Conflict

At its core, a capital run is the withdrawal of belief under pressure. Whether the instrument is silver coinage, gold-backed currency, sovereign debt, or a digital token, belief is the system’s primary line of defense. When promises become asymmetric—easy to claim but costly to honor—exit optionality emerges. Capital holders stop asking whether a system will fail and begin asking when continued participation becomes irrational. That moment marks the breach, even if the structure still appears intact.

Capital runs are coordination events, not panics. Early movers are not reckless; they are responding to incentives that reward speed and punish hesitation. In economic warfare, delay is costly. The last to exit absorbs the losses of those who moved first. This creates a narrow window in which recognition matters more than size. Those who act early do more than protect themselves—they change the battlefield by altering liquidity, pricing, and expectations, forcing others to respond.

This is where advanced speculators matter. Their importance lies not in aggression, but in interpretation. They combine balance-sheet awareness, policy constraints, historical memory, and liquidity mechanics. When they act, their behavior becomes intelligence. Markets follow actions, not explanations. In conflict, movement communicates more clearly than words.

Historical Capital Runs and the Games They Played

The British pound’s exit from the Exchange Rate Mechanism in 1992 illustrates economic warfare in a modern currency regime. Britain committed to defending sterling within a fixed exchange band despite weak growth and rising interest-rate costs. This created a classic one-way trade: the government’s downside increased with every hour of defense, while sellers faced limited risk. The Bank of England’s foreign exchange reserves—roughly £44–50 billion—were finite and visible. On September 16, 1992, the Bank spent an estimated £27 billion in a single day defending the pound and briefly raised interest rates toward 15%. The market did not retreat. Britain exited the ERM, and sterling fell roughly 10–15% against major currencies. The collapse was not caused by speculation; it was accelerated once it became clear the defense could not survive sustained pressure.

The breakdown of the dollar–gold system followed the same logic on a global scale. Under Bretton Woods, the United States promised foreign governments convertibility of dollars into gold at $35 per ounce. After World War II, U.S. gold reserves stood near 20,000 metric tons. By the late 1960s, reserves had fallen below 10,000 tons while offshore dollar claims continued to grow. The London Gold Pool attempted to suppress market prices by coordinated selling, but this defense revealed vulnerability rather than strength. As central banks—most famously France—began converting dollars into physical gold, withdrawals accelerated. Each conversion weakened remaining defenses and increased incentives for others to act. By 1971, reserves had fallen to roughly 8,100 tons. When the gold window closed, the conflict had already been decided. The announcement merely formalized an outcome the market had accepted years earlier.

Russia’s GKO crisis in 1998 shows how economic warfare operates in credit markets without dramatic selling. The Russian government financed itself through short-term Treasury bills, rolling maturities every few months at yields that eventually exceeded 40–60%. Solvency depended entirely on continuous refinancing. Foreign investors held roughly one-third of the market. When oil prices fell and global risk appetite collapsed after the Asian crisis, advanced speculators recognized that rollover risk—not fundamentals—was decisive. Rather than attacking prices, many simply refused to roll. Liquidity vanished. Reserves drained. The ruble was devalued and default declared. The currency lost roughly 70% of its value within months. The run succeeded through non-participation, a quiet but devastating form of pressure.

The Asian Financial Crisis of 1997–1998 illustrates how capital runs become decisive when currency pegs and external debt are jointly exposed. Throughout the early 1990s, countries such as Thailand, Indonesia, and South Korea maintained quasi-fixed exchange rates while accumulating large volumes of short-term, dollar-denominated borrowing. This created a structural asymmetry: central banks implicitly guaranteed stability without holding sufficient reserves to defend it. Advanced speculators recognized that confidence depended on uninterrupted capital rollover. When Thailand’s usable reserves proved far smaller than the officially reported $38 billion, the baht was forced to float and lost more than 50% of its value, triggering regional capital withdrawal and IMF intervention.

Ancient history reveals the same mechanics at slower speed. Roman debasement reduced silver content from near purity under Augustus to under 5% by the third century, triggering a slow-motion capital run. Citizens hoarded older, higher-quality coins, withdrew trust from official money, and shifted toward barter or foreign currencies. This was economic warfare conducted through everyday transactions rather than market orders, and it succeeded because the state’s promises no longer aligned with its capacity to defend them. By contrast, the Byzantine gold solidus represents one of history’s most successful monetary defenses. For over seven centuries, the solidus maintained remarkably stable gold content and weight, becoming the dominant settlement currency across Europe, the Mediterranean, and the Near East. Its durability was not accidental: it rested on credible enforcement, consistent minting, and institutional continuity. In modern terms, Byzantium solved an early version of the Byzantine Generals Problem—maintaining shared trust and coordination among dispersed actors without constant renegotiation. The solidus functioned as a reliable consensus layer, allowing trade and taxation to occur without continuous verification. Only when prolonged military conflict, fiscal strain, and political fragmentation eroded that institutional coherence did confidence finally withdraw. In this sense, the solidus anticipates Bitcoin’s core insight: that monetary systems endure not through flexibility, but through credible commitment, predictable rules, and resistance to discretionary debasement. When those conditions hold, economic warfare loses its leverage; when they fail, capital exits—slowly or suddenly—but always decisively.

Pattern Recognition: The Rules of Economic Warfare

Across eras, the same rules recur. One-way promises create optionality for capital holders and rising costs for defenders. Balance-sheet constraints collide with market time, which moves faster than political decision-making. Early withdrawals alter liquidity conditions, forcing others to respond. Reflexivity takes over: actions change fundamentals, which justify further action.

Consensus always forms before it is announced. Markets do not wait for official confirmation; they discover agreement through behavior. Liquidity thins, spreads widen, funding freezes, and prices gap. By the time narratives catch up, the outcome is already locked in.

Consensus is not democratic. It is formed by economically important actors, not by the majority. Liquidity providers, large holders, reserve managers, and intermediaries shape outcomes because they control settlement and funding. When they move, others adapt regardless of stated beliefs. In economic warfare, weight matters more than numbers.

Within this structure operates a small class of advanced speculators— or elite hedge funds—who function as early interpreters. They do not chase short-term mispricings. They specialize in detecting pre-finality: the moment when belief has cracked but is not yet visible. Their advantage lies in historical pattern recognition and policy constraint awareness. They know which defenses can hold and which cannot, not in theory but in practice.

Crucially, these actors do not create weakness. They accelerate resolution once outcomes are inevitable. Speed is not manipulation; it is pressure. Suppressing these signals does not preserve stability—it merely delays defeat and magnifies eventual damage.

Ledgers, Pre-Finality, and Real-Time Consensus

Ledger-based systems fundamentally change how economic warfare unfolds. Power does not reside at the moment of execution, but in the phase immediately before it. This phase—pre-finality—is where consensus forms, strategies converge, and outcomes become inevitable even though nothing irreversible has yet occurred. The ledger does not decide history; it timestamps the moment when history has already been decided.

As articulated in Mike Rogers, CPA’s Capital Velocity Economics (CVE) framework, economic significance lies less in issuance or static balances and more in movement: how frequently capital turns over, reallocates, or withdraws as risk appetite and positioning shift. In stressed market structures, changes in capital velocity often precede visible breakdowns. Velocity accelerates asymmetrically when belief fractures—liquidity rotates, collateral is repositioned, and exit optionality is exercised. In practice, capital velocity functions as an early signal of consensus formation or fracture, well before outcomes are finalized on-chain.

Consensus is often misunderstood as a formal mechanism—a vote, a block confirmation, a governance proposal. In reality, consensus is behavioral. It emerges when economically significant actors independently reach the same conclusion and begin to act. By the time a transaction is broadcast, liquidity is withdrawn, or a validator exits, the consensus has already formed off-ledger. The ledger merely makes that agreement visible and irreversible.

Traditional financial systems obscured pre-finality through opacity and delay. Settlement cycles, discretionary intervention, and fragmented reporting allowed belief to fracture quietly. Distributed ledgers eliminate this ambiguity. Capital movements, liquidity withdrawals, governance actions, and validator coordination occur in real time under a shared state. This does not create instability—it compresses time.

Reacting to ledger events is therefore reacting too late. A depeg, liquidation cascade, or governance execution is not the beginning of the conflict; it is the acknowledgment that the conflict has already been lost. Ledger finality represents the end of maneuver.

Web3 and the Future Market Battlefields

In a blockchain-driven financial system, economic warfare becomes explicit. Capital exits instantly. Governance is visible. Defenses are algorithmic. Finality is irreversible. This shifts power decisively toward those who can recognize inevitability earliest.

Consensus in Web3 remains weighted, not egalitarian. Validators, liquidity providers, large holders, and structurally constrained actors determine outcomes because their actions materially affect system viability. Advanced speculators specialize in reading early signals of consensus formation: liquidity thinning, validator alignment shifts, governance abstention, reserve stress, and cross-market hedging. These are not noise; they are reconnaissance.

Machines execute finality. Humans decide when finality is inevitable. Human judgment triggers exits and reallocations; algorithms simply enforce them at scale. Accountability therefore remains human, even in automated systems.

From ancient silver to digital ledgers, the game has not changed. Trust breaks before rules change. Capital moves before authority reacts. The future of markets is not trustless—it is faster recognition of broken trust. In a world of real-time ledgers and irreversible finality, history will be shaped by those who understand that economic warfare is decided before it is written into the ledger.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cryptonews.com. This article is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment or financial advice.

The post Capital Runs, Atomic Accelerators, and Regime Games appeared first on Cryptonews.

トークン化された株式に関する深刻化する対立は、業界の幹部たちが歴史的なデジタル資産法案の上院銀行委員会の部分における言語について分裂する中、ワシントンの包括的な暗号規制の推進を妨げる恐れがあります。

CoinbaseのCEOブライアン・アームストロングは、今月初めにトークン化された株式に対する「事実上の禁止」と呼ばれる論争のあるセクションについて述べました。一方、ケン・グリフィンのシタデル・セキュリティーズを含む伝統的な金融の重鎮たちは、ブロックチェーンベースの証券でも従来の証券でも同じルールに従うべきだと主張しています。

イギリスの立法者による正式な調査が、これらのデジタル通貨の急速な採用が銀行預金を移動させ、信用供給を混乱させると規制当局が考えているため、ステーブルコインの拡大に関して開始されました。

上院の金融サービス規制委員会は、1月29日の声明で、調査がイギリスにおけるステーブルコインの発展を明らかにし、イングランド銀行と金融行動監視機構による提案された規制が革新と金融の安定性の間でバランスを取るかどうかを決定すると述べました。

世界中の金融機関は、デジタル資産が重要であることをもはや納得する必要がありません。今の質問は、どこで制度的規模で、規制の確実性と商業的な実行可能性を持って展開できるかということです。アジア太平洋地域は、明確なライセンスフレームワークへの早期投資、コンプライアンス優先の規制、短期的な実験ではなく長期的な統合のために設計されたインフラのおかげで、ますますその答えとなっています。

2026年に入ると、アジア太平洋地域はパイロットプログラムを超えて決定的に進展しました。地域全体の機関投資家は急速に資金を配分しており、現在71%が暗号資産にさらされています。一方、政府や規制当局は、実際の資本配分を支援するフレームワークを進めています。香港の保険規制当局は、ライセンスを持つ保険会社がバランスシートの一部を暗号資産および関連インフラに配分できる法的フレームワークを提案しており、数十億ドルの保険資本がデジタル資産に入るための正式な道筋を作っています。なお、デジタル資産のエコシステム全体は急速に成長しており、ステーブルコイン市場だけでも約2800億ドルに達し、アジア太平洋地域は使用量と取引量の大幅な成長を促進しています。

主なポイント:

ポリーマーケットのような予測市場は、2026年に高い勝率と目に見える利益に押されて主要な暗号通貨の物語となりつつあります。

ほぼ完璧なパフォーマンスを持つアカウントは、しばしば市場予測ではなく自動化によって支えられています。

ボットは、結果を予測するのではなく、高いボラティリティの際に短期的な価格の非効率性を利用します。

Clawdbotのようなツールは自動化の障壁を下げますが、技術的な失敗や資金の管理喪失を含む新たなリスクをもたらします。

自動化はアドバンテージを生むことができますが、市場の理解、リスク管理、または長期的な持続可能性を置き換えるものではありません。

タロスは、機関向けのデジタル資産取引技術プロバイダーとして、4500万ドルのシリーズB拡張を行い、新たな投資家としてロビンフッド・マーケッツを迎えました。

タロスは4500万ドルのシリーズB拡張を完了し、シリーズBの総資金調達額を1億5000万ドルに引き上げました。
続きを読む: https://t.co/g3ZHG6n5SH

この拡張により、戦略的パートナーがタロスとより緊密に連携し、統合されたフロントからバックへのインフラストラクチャーを構築し続けます… pic.twitter.com/n1KhOvFvkN

— タロス (@talostrading) 2026年1月29日

長年にわたり、ビットコインは「デジタルゴールド」として称賛されてきました — 熱心な信者たちは、それが貴金属よりもはるかに優れていると主張しています。しかし、残念ながら市場は異なる意見を持っているようです。

金の驚異的な上昇は、減速の兆しを見せていません。過去1ヶ月で25%、過去6ヶ月で66%、そして5年前と比較して200%上昇しています。

これは公式に、金が世界最大の暗号通貨を大きく上回っていることを意味します。それに対して、BTCは1ヶ月前から2.5%下落しており、過去6ヶ月で25%の価値を失っています。一方、2021年以降のリターンはより控えめな156%です。

製造業の明日を再定義する
2026年2月12日、リヤドマリオットホテル

サウジアラビアの製造業は、スマートファクトリー技術、AI主導の自動化、産業IoT、ロボティクス、データ駆動型の運用における急速な進展によって、変革の重要な段階に突入しています。これらはすべて、王国のビジョン2030の目標に沿っています。これらの革新は、工場がどのように生産し、最適化し、スケールするかを再形成し、サウジアラビアの野望である、グローバルに競争力があり、技術的に進んだ、未来に備えた産業エコシステムの構築を反映しています。同時に、この加速したシフトは、新たな優先事項を前面に押し出しており、相互接続された工場のサイバーセキュリティ、強力なデータガバナンス、レジリエントなサプライチェーン、次世代製造システムを操作できる高度なスキルを持つ労働力が含まれています。

製造業の明日を再定義する
2026年2月12日、リヤドマリオットホテル

サウジアラビアの製造業は、スマートファクトリー技術、AI主導の自動化、産業IoT、ロボティクス、データ駆動のオペレーションにおける急速な進展によって、変革の重要な段階に入っています。これらはすべて、王国のビジョン2030の目標に沿っています。これらの革新は、工場が生産、最適化、スケールを行う方法を再構築し、サウジアラビアの野望を反映して、世界的に競争力があり、技術的に進んだ、未来に備えた産業エコシステムを築くことを目指しています。同時に、この加速した変化は、新たな優先事項を前面に押し出し、相互接続された工場のサイバーセキュリティ、強力なデータガバナンス、弾力的なサプライチェーン、次世代製造システムを運営できる高度なスキルを持つ労働力が求められています。