$BTC has recently slipped below the $86,000–$90,000 range after failing to sustain moves above $90K. Traders are watching a tight range as markets digest macro and regulatory developments. CoinDesk+1
• Some short-term technical setups show a consolidation phase, with key resistance near ~$94,000 and support around ~$80,000–$83,000. A breakout or breakdown from this range could define the next major trend. Blockchain News
Market Sentiment & Drivers:
• Sentiment remains mixed and cautious — oversold conditions are evident, but many traders aren’t ready to declare a definitive bottom yet. CoinDesk
• ETF flows and macro factors (like rate expectations and regulatory uncertainty) continue shaping BTC price dynamics. TechStock²
• Recent news that key U.S. crypto legislation was postponed has added downward pressure and increased volatility. The Economic Times
Forecast Outlook:
• Bullish view: If BTC can reclaim resistance above ~$95K, it could target higher ranges into year-end as traders buy dips. Blockchain News
•
Bitcoin is trading within a defined range with subdued momentum. Short-term volatility is still high, and a clear breakout above resistance or breakdown below support will likely determine the next directional move. Traders remain cautious amid mixed signals from macro, regulatory, and institutional flows.
@The Notcoin Official はTelegramに基づいたWeb3のプレイ・トゥ・アーン(P2E)ゲームで、The Open Network(TON)ブロックチェーン上で動作し、Open Buildersチームによって開発され、TON財団の支援を受けています。 そのコア理念は——シンプルで楽しく、敷居の低いゲームを通じて、より多くの人々をWeb3の世界に引き込むことです。 最初のプレイは「クリックマイニング」だけでした。プレイヤーはTelegramのチャットボックスで画面上のアニメーションコインをクリックすることでNOTトークンを掘り出すことができます。
BREAKING: China has officially lifted its 125% tariffs on certain U.S. imports, signaling a major shift in global trade tensions. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has announced a 90-day pause on the implementation of most proposed "reciprocal" tariffs—excluding those targeting China. However, confusion remains as Trump continues to contradict himself on tariff policies, creating uncertainty in the markets. Will this lead to another DUMP? The market reaction is mixed, and traders are seeking clarity. Stay cautious and watch closely—macro news like this can trigger unexpected volatility.
President Donald Trump has intensified his longstanding feud with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, expressing renewed interest in removing him from office. This escalation raises significant concerns about the independence of the Federal Reserve and potential repercussions for financial markets.Fortune+8Reuters+8Time+8
🔥 Trump’s Renewed Push to Oust Powell
Trump, who initially appointed Powell in 2017, has grown increasingly critical of the Fed Chair's decisions, particularly regarding interest rates. He accuses Powell of acting politically by not lowering rates during his administration and then cutting them ahead of the 2024 election, which he claims benefited Democrats . In a recent statement, Trump remarked, "If I want him out, he'll be out of there real fast, believe me" .Latest news & breaking headlines+2Time+2AP News+2Latest news & breaking headlineseuronews
White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett confirmed that Trump is exploring legal avenues to dismiss Powell, suggesting that new legal interpretations might allow for such action .Reuters+1Latest news & breaking headlines+1
⚖️ Legal and Institutional Implications
The Federal Reserve Act stipulates that a Fed Chair can only be removed "for cause," typically interpreted as misconduct or incapacity, not policy disagreements. Historically, no Fed Chair has been dismissed by a president . Powell has asserted that he cannot be legally removed and intends to serve his term through May 2026.TimeReuters+1Business Insider+1
A pending Supreme Court case concerning presidential powers over independent agencies could set a precedent affecting the Fed's autonomy. Legal experts warn that removing Powell could undermine the Fed's independence and destabilize financial markets .Newsweek+5Time+5Reuters+5Reuters+1Time+1
President Donald Trump has intensified his longstanding feud with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, expressing renewed interest in removing him from office. This escalation raises significant concerns about the independence of the Federal Reserve and potential repercussions for financial markets.Fortune+8Reuters+8Time+8
🔥 Trump’s Renewed Push to Oust Powell
Trump, who initially appointed Powell in 2017, has grown increasingly critical of the Fed Chair's decisions, particularly regarding interest rates. He accuses Powell of acting politically by not lowering rates during his administration and then cutting them ahead of the 2024 election, which he claims benefited Democrats . In a recent statement, Trump remarked, "If I want him out, he'll be out of there real fast, believe me" .Latest news & breaking headlines+2Time+2AP News+2Latest news & breaking headlineseuronews
White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett confirmed that Trump is exploring legal avenues to dismiss Powell, suggesting that new legal interpretations might allow for such action .Reuters+1Latest news & breaking headlines+1
⚖️ Legal and Institutional Implications
The Federal Reserve Act stipulates that a Fed Chair can only be removed "for cause," typically interpreted as misconduct or incapacity, not policy disagreements. Historically, no Fed Chair has been dismissed by a president . Powell has asserted that he cannot be legally removed and intends to serve his term through May 2026.TimeReuters+1Business Insider+1
A pending Supreme Court case concerning presidential powers over independent agencies could set a precedent affecting the Fed's autonomy. Legal experts warn that removing Powell could undermine the Fed's independence and destabilize financial markets .Newsweek+5Time+5Reuters+5Reuters+1Time+1
📉 Economic and Market Repercussions
Trump's aggressive trade policies, including imposing a 145% tariff on Chinese goods, have been criticized for exacerbating inflation and economic uncertainty .
As global trade evolves, digital currencies like Bitcoin are beginning to intersect with traditional economic tools such as tariffs. Tariffs—taxes on imported or exported goods—are typically used by governments to protect domestic industries or exert economic pressure. While Bitcoin isn't a physical good subject to customs duties, it is increasingly relevant in discussions about trade, taxation, and economic sovereignty.
1. Circumventing Tariffs with Bitcoin
One of the most controversial aspects of Bitcoin is its potential use in bypassing traditional financial systems. Businesses engaged in international trade might use Bitcoin to settle cross-border payments, avoiding banks and the fees or delays associated with currency conversion. In theory, this could also be used to dodge tariffs or sanctions by masking the nature of transactions or the origin of funds.
2. Tariffs on Mining Equipment
Countries like the United States and China have engaged in tariff wars that included taxes on cryptocurrency mining equipment such as ASIC miners. These tariffs impact the cost of setting up mining operations and can shift the geographical landscape of Bitcoin mining. For example, high tariffs on Chinese-made mining rigs have incentivized mining companies to relocate or source hardware from other countries.
3. Regulation and Policy Response
Governments are becoming increasingly aware of how cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin can be used to undermine traditional trade policies. In response, some countries are tightening regulations on crypto exchanges and wallet providers, enforcing Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) rules to ensure these platforms cannot be used to circumvent tariffs and sanctions.
4. Future Outlook
As blockchain technology becomes more intertwined with global commerce, the challenge for regulators will be to adapt old tools like tariffs to a new, decentralized financial reality. Bitcoin presents a test case for how policy can keep pace with innovation—striking a balance between encouraging technological progress and maintaining the integrity of international trade laws.
Would you like this expanded into a full article or adapted for a specific use—like a presentation, essay, or blog post?
Bitcoin with Tariffs: A New Angle on Global Trade
As global trade evolves, digital currencies like Bitcoin are beginning to intersect with traditional economic tools such as tariffs. Tariffs—taxes on imported or exported goods—are typically used by governments to protect domestic industries or exert economic pressure. While Bitcoin isn't a physical good subject to customs duties, it is increasingly relevant in discussions about trade, taxation, and economic sovereignty.
1. Circumventing Tariffs with Bitcoin
One of the most controversial aspects of Bitcoin is its potential use in bypassing traditional financial systems. Businesses engaged in international trade might use Bitcoin to settle cross-border payments, avoiding banks and the fees or delays associated with currency conversion. In theory, this could also be used to dodge tariffs or sanctions by masking the nature of transactions or the origin of funds.
2. Tariffs on Mining Equipment
Countries like the United States and China have engaged in tariff wars that included taxes on cryptocurrency mining equipment such as ASIC miners. These tariffs impact the cost of setting up mining operations and can shift the geographical landscape of Bitcoin mining. For example, high tariffs on Chinese-made mining rigs have incentivized mining companies to relocate or source hardware from other countries.
3. Regulation and Policy Response
Governments are becoming increasingly aware of how cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin can be used to undermine traditional trade policies. In response, some countries are tightening regulations on crypto exchanges and wallet providers, enforcing Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) rules to ensure these platforms cannot be used to circumvent tariffs and sanctions.
4. Future Outlook
As blockchain technology becomes more intertwined with global commerce, the challenge for regulators will be to adapt old tools like tariffs to a new, decentralized financial reality. Bitcoin presents a test case for how policy can keep pace with innovation—striking a balance between encouraging technological progress and maintaining the integrity of international trade laws.
Would you like this expanded into a full article or adapted for a specific use—like a presentation, essay, or blog post?