Binance Square

BlockViz

Crypto price and market data visualization and simulation website for traders and macro-focused investors.
6 フォロー
29 フォロワー
57 いいね
1 共有
--
ブリッシュ
原文参照
$DASH は上昇し続けています。過去24時間でさらに12%。$ZEC のような仲間たちが停滞している中で。ですが、なぜでしょうか? Z-cash側の悪いニュース(開発チームの離脱)からの影響がまだ残っているようで、私たちが見た大規模なブレイクアウトと相まって、まだ勢いがついています。 あなたはどう思いますか?どれだけさらに上昇するでしょうか? 📈🤔 {spot}(DASHUSDT) {spot}(ZECUSDT)
$DASH は上昇し続けています。過去24時間でさらに12%。$ZEC のような仲間たちが停滞している中で。ですが、なぜでしょうか?
Z-cash側の悪いニュース(開発チームの離脱)からの影響がまだ残っているようで、私たちが見た大規模なブレイクアウトと相まって、まだ勢いがついています。

あなたはどう思いますか?どれだけさらに上昇するでしょうか? 📈🤔
--
ブリッシュ
原文参照
もし$SOL が$BNB の時価総額を持っていたら、すでに230ドルに戻っているでしょう。🚀 質問は:なぜ私たちはそうなっていないのですか?🤔 {spot}(SOLUSDT) {spot}(BNBUSDT)
もし$SOL $BNB の時価総額を持っていたら、すでに230ドルに戻っているでしょう。🚀

質問は:なぜ私たちはそうなっていないのですか?🤔
翻訳
$MANA rose only half as much as $SAND over the last days. Does that spell weakness or catchup opportunity? {spot}(MANAUSDT) {spot}(SANDUSDT)
$MANA rose only half as much as $SAND over the last days.
Does that spell weakness or catchup opportunity?
原文参照
ビットコインは再び$95Kを上回っており、そのタイミングは偶然ではありません。 CPIの柔らかい印刷がインフレのストーリーからいくらかの熱を取り除き、金利引き下げの期待が高まり、$BTC 即座に買いが入りました。価格は3.5%以上上昇し、現在は数週間にわたり反発を抑えてきた$95Kから$97Kのゾーンに押し込んでいます。 では、$100Kはテーブルに戻ってきているのでしょうか? はい、しかしこの動きが実際に持続する場合に限ります。 ブルケース: • マクロの逆風が和らぎ、リスク選好が改善し、BTCがついに$95Kから$97Kの天井を超えて受け入れられるようになります。 • そのゾーンをクリーンにクローズし、成功した再テストが行われれば、$100Kはミーム的なものから磁石的なものになります。 スタルケース: • 私たちは以前にこの映画を見たことがあります。BTCが抵抗に押し込まれ、皆が興奮し、その後、売り手が強さに対して売り込むと共にフェードします。 • BTCが$95Kを維持できず、レンジに戻ってしまうと、$100Kは遅れ、再び揉み合いに戻ります。 サインはシンプルです:BTCが$95Kを超えて高い安値を築くのか、それとも別の迅速な拒絶のウィックが来るのか。 #btc100knext? {spot}(BTCUSDT)
ビットコインは再び$95Kを上回っており、そのタイミングは偶然ではありません。

CPIの柔らかい印刷がインフレのストーリーからいくらかの熱を取り除き、金利引き下げの期待が高まり、$BTC 即座に買いが入りました。価格は3.5%以上上昇し、現在は数週間にわたり反発を抑えてきた$95Kから$97Kのゾーンに押し込んでいます。

では、$100Kはテーブルに戻ってきているのでしょうか?

はい、しかしこの動きが実際に持続する場合に限ります。

ブルケース:
• マクロの逆風が和らぎ、リスク選好が改善し、BTCがついに$95Kから$97Kの天井を超えて受け入れられるようになります。
• そのゾーンをクリーンにクローズし、成功した再テストが行われれば、$100Kはミーム的なものから磁石的なものになります。

スタルケース:
• 私たちは以前にこの映画を見たことがあります。BTCが抵抗に押し込まれ、皆が興奮し、その後、売り手が強さに対して売り込むと共にフェードします。
• BTCが$95Kを維持できず、レンジに戻ってしまうと、$100Kは遅れ、再び揉み合いに戻ります。

サインはシンプルです:BTCが$95Kを超えて高い安値を築くのか、それとも別の迅速な拒絶のウィックが来るのか。

#btc100knext?
--
ブリッシュ
原文参照
$SAND サンドボックスの復活。過去24時間で25%以上の上昇を見せており、実際の強さを示しています。$AXS のように死から戻ってきたのでしょうか? 確かに理由は似ています: - 主に技術的なブレイクアウトが続くモメンタムを引き起こしている - また、実際のボリュームの増加を伴ったメタバースへの全体的なセクターのローテーション。 質問は:どれくらい続くでしょうか?🤔 {spot}(SANDUSDT)
$SAND サンドボックスの復活。過去24時間で25%以上の上昇を見せており、実際の強さを示しています。$AXS のように死から戻ってきたのでしょうか?
確かに理由は似ています:
- 主に技術的なブレイクアウトが続くモメンタムを引き起こしている
- また、実際のボリュームの増加を伴ったメタバースへの全体的なセクターのローテーション。

質問は:どれくらい続くでしょうか?🤔
--
ブリッシュ
原文参照
$AXS が非常に勢いよく上昇しており、ボリンジャーバンドを突破しています! 🚀 ホットな話題ですが、なぜでしょう? 主に二つの理由があります: (1) トークンインフレーションの減少への戦略的シフト と (2) トレーダーによって積み重ねられている巨大なモメンタムを生み出す技術的なブレイクアウト。 Axieはどれくらい高くなることができるのでしょうか?🤔 {spot}(AXSUSDT)
$AXS が非常に勢いよく上昇しており、ボリンジャーバンドを突破しています!
🚀 ホットな話題ですが、なぜでしょう?
主に二つの理由があります:
(1) トークンインフレーションの減少への戦略的シフト

(2) トレーダーによって積み重ねられている巨大なモメンタムを生み出す技術的なブレイクアウト。

Axieはどれくらい高くなることができるのでしょうか?🤔
翻訳
Crazy moves by $ZEC and $DASH over the last 90 days. Both had significant pumps and dumps, but not equally. DASH +74.5% vs ZEC +66.1%. DASH suddenly caught up and overtook ZEC in the last days. 🚀🤔 Does this continue? {spot}(DASHUSDT)
Crazy moves by $ZEC and $DASH over the last 90 days.
Both had significant pumps and dumps, but not equally.
DASH +74.5% vs ZEC +66.1%.
DASH suddenly caught up and overtook ZEC in the last days. 🚀🤔

Does this continue?
--
ブリッシュ
翻訳
$ETH at 50% of $BTC 's market cap = $7,908 (+140%). Where do you personally cap it: 50% is too high, too low, or fair? {spot}(BTCUSDT) {spot}(ETHUSDT)
$ETH at 50% of $BTC 's market cap = $7,908 (+140%).

Where do you personally cap it: 50% is too high, too low, or fair?
翻訳
Does Crypto Seasonality Exist? Yes, But Not in the Way Most People Think{spot}(BTCUSDT) {spot}(ETHUSDT) Seasonality is one of the most frequently cited and least rigorously understood concepts in crypto markets. You have likely seen claims such as “Q4 is always bullish,” “September is weak,” or “Bitcoin rallies in Up-tober.” Some of these statements are directionally true. Many are misleading. Almost all are incomplete without context. Using long-term BTC and ETH seasonality heatmaps, both monthly and quarterly, a clearer picture emerges: crypto does exhibit seasonal tendencies, but those tendencies are highly conditional on market regime and cycle position. What the Data Actually Shows When you aggregate returns by month or quarter across many years, patterns do appear. For Bitcoin: Q4 has historically delivered the strongest average returns.November and December stand out across multiple bull cycles.Q2 tends to be more mixed, with frequent drawdowns in late-cycle or bear phases. For Ethereum: Returns are more volatile, but the same broad structure appears.Explosive Q4 performance clusters in specific years rather than evenly across time.Weakness is often concentrated mid-year during risk-off phases. The key point is this: seasonality exists in the data, but it is unevenly distributed across years. The heatmaps make this obvious. Strong months cluster together. Weak months cluster together. This is not how classical seasonality behaves in mature asset classes. Which leads to the real driver. Seasonality vs the 4-Year Crypto Cycle Most of what people call “crypto seasonality” is actually cycle-conditioned behavior. The 4-year cycle, anchored loosely around Bitcoin halvings and liquidity expansion, dominates return distributions. It creates long regimes of accumulation, expansion, speculation, and contraction. Seasonality does not override this cycle. It is filtered through it. In post-halving expansion years, seasonal strength becomes amplified.In late bull or bear years, the same calendar months often underperform or reverse.Averaging across all years blends fundamentally different regimes into a single number. This is why statements like “Q4 is bullish” feel true but fail as standalone rules. Q4 is bullish in expansionary phases, not universally. Crypto winter and crypto summer are useful metaphors, but they describe cycle phases, not calendar certainty. Why Seasonal Averages Can Be Misleading Seasonal averages hide three structural realities of crypto markets: Returns are extremely concentrated A small number of months and quarters drive the majority of multi-year performance. This is visible in both $BTC and $ETH heatmaps, where a handful of periods dominate cumulative returns.Regime dependency matters more than the calendar The same month behaves very differently depending on whether liquidity is expanding or contracting.Volatility distorts intuition High volatility amplifies both upside and downside, making coincidental alignment with calendar periods look like causation. Seasonality without regime awareness becomes narrative fitting. What Seasonality Is Actually Useful For Seasonality is not a timing signal. It is a contextual lens. Used correctly, it helps with: Setting expectations around volatility and dispersionUnderstanding why certain months feel emotionally harder to hold throughStress-testing narratives like “this always happens in X month”Comparing different assets across similar calendar windows Used incorrectly, it leads to overconfident positioning and fragile strategies. A Practical Framework A more robust way to think about crypto seasonality is hierarchical: Cycle first Where are we in the broader expansion or contraction cycle?Regime second Is liquidity tightening or loosening? Is risk appetite rising or falling?Seasonality last Within this regime, how have calendar periods tended to behave historically? When seasonality aligns with cycle direction, it can reinforce trends. When it conflicts, it usually loses. Key Takeaways Crypto does exhibit seasonal patterns, visible in long-term monthly and quarterly return data.These patterns are not stable across time and are heavily conditioned by the 4-year cycle.What looks like seasonality is often cyclicality expressed through the calendar.Seasonal averages are descriptive, not predictive.The real value lies in understanding context, not chasing dates. Seasonality exists in crypto. Just not as a rulebook. Sources: https://blockviz.xyz/price/seasonality

Does Crypto Seasonality Exist? Yes, But Not in the Way Most People Think


Seasonality is one of the most frequently cited and least rigorously understood concepts in crypto markets.
You have likely seen claims such as “Q4 is always bullish,” “September is weak,” or “Bitcoin rallies in Up-tober.” Some of these statements are directionally true. Many are misleading. Almost all are incomplete without context.
Using long-term BTC and ETH seasonality heatmaps, both monthly and quarterly, a clearer picture emerges: crypto does exhibit seasonal tendencies, but those tendencies are highly conditional on market regime and cycle position.
What the Data Actually Shows
When you aggregate returns by month or quarter across many years, patterns do appear.

For Bitcoin:
Q4 has historically delivered the strongest average returns.November and December stand out across multiple bull cycles.Q2 tends to be more mixed, with frequent drawdowns in late-cycle or bear phases.

For Ethereum:

Returns are more volatile, but the same broad structure appears.Explosive Q4 performance clusters in specific years rather than evenly across time.Weakness is often concentrated mid-year during risk-off phases.

The key point is this: seasonality exists in the data, but it is unevenly distributed across years. The heatmaps make this obvious. Strong months cluster together. Weak months cluster together. This is not how classical seasonality behaves in mature asset classes.
Which leads to the real driver.
Seasonality vs the 4-Year Crypto Cycle
Most of what people call “crypto seasonality” is actually cycle-conditioned behavior.
The 4-year cycle, anchored loosely around Bitcoin halvings and liquidity expansion, dominates return distributions. It creates long regimes of accumulation, expansion, speculation, and contraction.
Seasonality does not override this cycle. It is filtered through it.
In post-halving expansion years, seasonal strength becomes amplified.In late bull or bear years, the same calendar months often underperform or reverse.Averaging across all years blends fundamentally different regimes into a single number.

This is why statements like “Q4 is bullish” feel true but fail as standalone rules. Q4 is bullish in expansionary phases, not universally.
Crypto winter and crypto summer are useful metaphors, but they describe cycle phases, not calendar certainty.
Why Seasonal Averages Can Be Misleading

Seasonal averages hide three structural realities of crypto markets:

Returns are extremely concentrated A small number of months and quarters drive the majority of multi-year performance. This is visible in both $BTC and $ETH heatmaps, where a handful of periods dominate cumulative returns.Regime dependency matters more than the calendar The same month behaves very differently depending on whether liquidity is expanding or contracting.Volatility distorts intuition High volatility amplifies both upside and downside, making coincidental alignment with calendar periods look like causation.

Seasonality without regime awareness becomes narrative fitting.
What Seasonality Is Actually Useful For
Seasonality is not a timing signal. It is a contextual lens.
Used correctly, it helps with:

Setting expectations around volatility and dispersionUnderstanding why certain months feel emotionally harder to hold throughStress-testing narratives like “this always happens in X month”Comparing different assets across similar calendar windows

Used incorrectly, it leads to overconfident positioning and fragile strategies.
A Practical Framework
A more robust way to think about crypto seasonality is hierarchical:

Cycle first Where are we in the broader expansion or contraction cycle?Regime second Is liquidity tightening or loosening? Is risk appetite rising or falling?Seasonality last Within this regime, how have calendar periods tended to behave historically?

When seasonality aligns with cycle direction, it can reinforce trends. When it conflicts, it usually loses.
Key Takeaways
Crypto does exhibit seasonal patterns, visible in long-term monthly and quarterly return data.These patterns are not stable across time and are heavily conditioned by the 4-year cycle.What looks like seasonality is often cyclicality expressed through the calendar.Seasonal averages are descriptive, not predictive.The real value lies in understanding context, not chasing dates.

Seasonality exists in crypto. Just not as a rulebook.

Sources: https://blockviz.xyz/price/seasonality
翻訳
$SOL has overtaken $XRP in its Year to Date performance. {spot}(SOLUSDT) While Ripple had a strong start to the year, surging over 30% it came back down and now stands at +11% for the year. While Solana took it slow-and-steady but ultimately overtook XRP and now stands at +14% for the year. What do you think who will prevail this year? 😎
$SOL has overtaken $XRP in its Year to Date performance.
While Ripple had a strong start to the year, surging over 30% it came back down and now stands at +11% for the year.
While Solana took it slow-and-steady but ultimately overtook XRP and now stands at +14% for the year.

What do you think who will prevail this year? 😎
翻訳
$KAITO dumps as Twitter kills InfoFi. {spot}(KAITOUSDT) Feels related, even if no one wants to say it out loud. A lot of InfoFi only worked because X rewards existed. Not just payouts, but visibility. Tweets ranked, threads surfaced, engagement mattered. Attention was the currency and X was the exchange. Now that rewards are gone, the whole thing looks shaky. If InfoFi depends on being paid for posting on one platform, was it ever really InfoFi or just incentivized content farming? KAITO selling off makes sense in that context. If the main distribution and reward loop disappears, the token narrative weakens fast. You can’t price in “information markets” when the market for attention just got rug pulled. The real question is whether InfoFi can exist without X at the center. Can it move on chain? Can it reward signal instead of engagement? Can it survive without algorithmic amplification? If the answer is no, then InfoFi wasn’t a new primitive. It was a feature riding on Twitter’s incentives. If the answer is yes, this is probably the shakeout it needed. Curious to see which projects were actually building infrastructure and which were just farming impressions.
$KAITO dumps as Twitter kills InfoFi.

Feels related, even if no one wants to say it out loud.

A lot of InfoFi only worked because X rewards existed. Not just payouts, but visibility. Tweets ranked, threads surfaced, engagement mattered. Attention was the currency and X was the exchange.

Now that rewards are gone, the whole thing looks shaky.

If InfoFi depends on being paid for posting on one platform, was it ever really InfoFi or just incentivized content farming?

KAITO selling off makes sense in that context. If the main distribution and reward loop disappears, the token narrative weakens fast. You can’t price in “information markets” when the market for attention just got rug pulled.

The real question is whether InfoFi can exist without X at the center.

Can it move on chain?
Can it reward signal instead of engagement?
Can it survive without algorithmic amplification?

If the answer is no, then InfoFi wasn’t a new primitive. It was a feature riding on Twitter’s incentives.

If the answer is yes, this is probably the shakeout it needed.

Curious to see which projects were actually building infrastructure and which were just farming impressions.
翻訳
CME is adding futures for $ADA , LINK, and XLM and that is a bigger deal than it sounds. It basically means more regulated ways for funds to get exposure or hedge, without touching spot directly. Launch is planned for Feb 9, pending regulatory review. 🚀 So which token benefits the most? 🤔 My pick is . . . $LINK ! 🚀 Why LINK: • It already sits in the “infrastructure” bucket that institutions understand (oracles, data rails). When tradfi gets a new ticker, they usually start with stuff that feels like picks and shovels. • Futures matter most when there is real hedging demand. LINK has active traders, a lot of spot liquidity, and it is used across DeFi, so hedging and basis trades make more sense here than for a pure hype coin. • LINK has shown clear outperformance since the beginning of the year (see chart below)! ADA will benefit too, but more in a “bigger audience can trade it” way. It has a massive community, and CME access can legitimize it further, but ADA has also had lots of attention already, so the marginal effect might be smaller. XLM is the wild card. It could surprise because it is under-owned compared to the other two, so even a small wave of new access can move it. But it usually needs a stronger narrative spark than just “futures launched.” One caution: new futures do not automatically mean price goes up. Sometimes it pumps on the headline, then chops because traders use futures to short or hedge. Still, longer term it is a positive sign that CME keeps expanding beyond just BTC and ETH.
CME is adding futures for $ADA , LINK, and XLM and that is a bigger deal than it sounds. It basically means more regulated ways for funds to get exposure or hedge, without touching spot directly. Launch is planned for Feb 9, pending regulatory review. 🚀

So which token benefits the most? 🤔
My pick is . . . $LINK ! 🚀

Why LINK:
• It already sits in the “infrastructure” bucket that institutions understand (oracles, data rails). When tradfi gets a new ticker, they usually start with stuff that feels like picks and shovels.
• Futures matter most when there is real hedging demand. LINK has active traders, a lot of spot liquidity, and it is used across DeFi, so hedging and basis trades make more sense here than for a pure hype coin.
• LINK has shown clear outperformance since the beginning of the year (see chart below)!

ADA will benefit too, but more in a “bigger audience can trade it” way. It has a massive community, and CME access can legitimize it further, but ADA has also had lots of attention already, so the marginal effect might be smaller.

XLM is the wild card. It could surprise because it is under-owned compared to the other two, so even a small wave of new access can move it. But it usually needs a stronger narrative spark than just “futures launched.”

One caution: new futures do not automatically mean price goes up. Sometimes it pumps on the headline, then chops because traders use futures to short or hedge. Still, longer term it is a positive sign that CME keeps expanding beyond just BTC and ETH.
翻訳
Today was a classic “digest the rally” session. Total crypto market cap cooled to around $3.2T (-1.4%) after pushing higher earlier. Altcoins lagged harder (about -2.3%), while BTC dominance held near 59%, so Bitcoin kept gaining share even as the market paused. 😴 $BTC traded in the mid-$90Ks after briefly pushing above $97K, while $ETH held up better than most alts. Volume faded (about -20%) but derivatives open interest rose (about +11%), which usually means leverage is rebuilding even though price is not trending yet. Under the hood, the bid still looks institutional: spot BTC ETFs stayed strong with another large inflow day, and bigger wallets have been adding while smaller holders have been net sellers. That mix tends to support the uptrend, but it also raises liquidation risk if we get a negative shock. 💸 #Macro is still a tailwind with rate cut expectations in the background, but regulation is back in focus after the US Senate Banking Committee delayed progress on a market structure bill and the debate over yield-bearing stablecoins intensified. 📉 Net: BTC-led consolidation near highs, alts still heavy, leverage rising, sentiment back in “greed.” The next big move likely depends on whether BTC can hold these levels without another leverage flush.
Today was a classic “digest the rally” session.

Total crypto market cap cooled to around $3.2T (-1.4%) after pushing higher earlier. Altcoins lagged harder (about -2.3%), while BTC dominance held near 59%, so Bitcoin kept gaining share even as the market paused. 😴

$BTC traded in the mid-$90Ks after briefly pushing above $97K, while $ETH held up better than most alts. Volume faded (about -20%) but derivatives open interest rose (about +11%), which usually means leverage is rebuilding even though price is not trending yet.

Under the hood, the bid still looks institutional: spot BTC ETFs stayed strong with another large inflow day, and bigger wallets have been adding while smaller holders have been net sellers. That mix tends to support the uptrend, but it also raises liquidation risk if we get a negative shock. 💸

#Macro is still a tailwind with rate cut expectations in the background, but regulation is back in focus after the US Senate Banking Committee delayed progress on a market structure bill and the debate over yield-bearing stablecoins intensified. 📉

Net: BTC-led consolidation near highs, alts still heavy, leverage rising, sentiment back in “greed.” The next big move likely depends on whether BTC can hold these levels without another leverage flush.
翻訳
$DASH losing 10% in 24h looks like a trip-back down. But when you zoom out, after the massive pump, it looks more like consolidation. Are we gearing up for a move higher? 🚀 Or is this a bull trap? 🤔
$DASH losing 10% in 24h looks like a trip-back down. But when you zoom out, after the massive pump, it looks more like consolidation.

Are we gearing up for a move higher? 🚀 Or is this a bull trap? 🤔
--
ブリッシュ
翻訳
Running the numbers: if $BNB catches up to $ETH , we're looking at $2,960 per coin. 💎 That's a +216% move from here, requiring $275.8B in fresh capital. Will it happen?
Running the numbers: if $BNB catches up to $ETH , we're looking at $2,960 per coin. 💎
That's a +216% move from here, requiring $275.8B in fresh capital.

Will it happen?
翻訳
Year-to-Date $SOL has outperformed $ETH by 4.6%. ETH is up 13.6% while SOL is up 18.1%. The max outperformance was on Jan 12th with 9.3% delta between SOL and ETH.
Year-to-Date $SOL has outperformed $ETH by 4.6%. ETH is up 13.6% while SOL is up 18.1%.
The max outperformance was on Jan 12th with 9.3% delta between SOL and ETH.
翻訳
Privacy coins are ripping again — and honestly, this move feels real, not just random green candles. 🚀🔒 Monero (XMR) just pushed into fresh all-time-high territory, and when XMR leads, the whole privacy basket usually wakes up. Right on cue, Dash (DASH) is catching that “beta bid” right after — classic rotation from the sector leader into the laggards. Why this is happening (IMO) The privacy narrative is back. More reporting + compliance pressure keeps ramping up, and markets love to front-run the “privacy hedge” trade. 🕵️‍♂️ • Rotation season. When BTC chills and people want volatility, money flows into smaller sectors that can actually move. • Positioning is light. Privacy coins have been ignored for a while… so when momentum flips, the squeeze can get nasty (in a good way). 😅 So what’s the ceiling for XMR + DASH? Forget the one magic price target. Think levels + structure. $XMR • First ceiling is psychological: round numbers like 700 can act like a magnet… then turn into a wall. 🧲 • The real tell: does XMR hold above the breakout zone after the initial spike? -> If it holds → trend extension is on the table. -> If it loses it fast → could be a blow-off top + sharp mean reversion. $DASH • DASH is more beta — it can move faster up and down. ⚡ • 50 is the first obvious battleground. -> Accepts above 50 + holds → next squeeze zone opens up. -> Hard rejection → often means it was mostly momentum and profit-taking hits quick. What I’m watching next 👀 ✅ Does XMR consolidate near highs without a deep dump? ✅ Does DASH hold breakout levels instead of giving it all back? ✅ If BTC starts trending hard again… does liquidity stay in privacy or rotate out?
Privacy coins are ripping again — and honestly, this move feels real, not just random green candles. 🚀🔒

Monero (XMR) just pushed into fresh all-time-high territory, and when XMR leads, the whole privacy basket usually wakes up. Right on cue, Dash (DASH) is catching that “beta bid” right after — classic rotation from the sector leader into the laggards.

Why this is happening (IMO)
The privacy narrative is back. More reporting + compliance pressure keeps ramping up, and markets love to front-run the “privacy hedge” trade. 🕵️‍♂️
• Rotation season. When BTC chills and people want volatility, money flows into smaller sectors that can actually move.
• Positioning is light. Privacy coins have been ignored for a while… so when momentum flips, the squeeze can get nasty (in a good way). 😅

So what’s the ceiling for XMR + DASH?
Forget the one magic price target. Think levels + structure.

$XMR
• First ceiling is psychological: round numbers like 700 can act like a magnet… then turn into a wall. 🧲
• The real tell: does XMR hold above the breakout zone after the initial spike?
-> If it holds → trend extension is on the table.
-> If it loses it fast → could be a blow-off top + sharp mean reversion.

$DASH
• DASH is more beta — it can move faster up and down. ⚡
• 50 is the first obvious battleground.
-> Accepts above 50 + holds → next squeeze zone opens up.
-> Hard rejection → often means it was mostly momentum and profit-taking hits quick.

What I’m watching next 👀
✅ Does XMR consolidate near highs without a deep dump?
✅ Does DASH hold breakout levels instead of giving it all back?
✅ If BTC starts trending hard again… does liquidity stay in privacy or rotate out?
翻訳
Soft CPI just gave $BTC  the macro green light today and you can see it immediately in price action: risk bid turns on, yields cool off, and Bitcoin gets another shot at the top of the range, breaking its hourly moving averages to the upside! 🚀📈 What the CPI print implies for BTC • Softer inflation reduces the urgency for "higher for longer" talk. • That tends to loosen financial conditions, which is exactly what BTC likes when it is already basing. • In other words: CPI does not magically create a bull market, but it can remove the brake. The real question: can BTC clear 94k? 94k has been the rejection level for weeks. Every time BTC pokes above it, sellers show up fast. That is why this level matters more than any headline. Scenario A: Break and hold above 94k (bullish) 💸 • A clean daily close above 94k, followed by 94k acting as support on a retest • That is when 100k becomes a realistic magnet, not just a meme • If we get acceptance above 94k, the move can accelerate because sidelined buyers chase and shorts cover Scenario B: Another wick above 94k and fade (still chop) • If BTC pops on CPI and then gives it back, it is the same range story • That would signal supply is still sitting overhead and the market is not ready for trend yet • In that case, we likely rotate back into the mid-range and keep grinding What I am watching into the close • Does BTC hold the gains, or does it do the usual vertical selloff after the spike • Does volume expand on the breakout attempt, not just on the wick • Where does the weekly structure settle relative to 90k and 94k What do you think? Are we heading higher? 🤔
Soft CPI just gave $BTC  the macro green light today and you can see it immediately in price action: risk bid turns on, yields cool off, and Bitcoin gets another shot at the top of the range, breaking its hourly moving averages to the upside! 🚀📈

What the CPI print implies for BTC
• Softer inflation reduces the urgency for "higher for longer" talk.
• That tends to loosen financial conditions, which is exactly what BTC likes when it is already basing.
• In other words: CPI does not magically create a bull market, but it can remove the brake.

The real question: can BTC clear 94k?
94k has been the rejection level for weeks. Every time BTC pokes above it, sellers show up fast. That is why this level matters more than any headline.

Scenario A: Break and hold above 94k (bullish) 💸
• A clean daily close above 94k, followed by 94k acting as support on a retest
• That is when 100k becomes a realistic magnet, not just a meme
• If we get acceptance above 94k, the move can accelerate because sidelined buyers chase and shorts cover

Scenario B: Another wick above 94k and fade (still chop)
• If BTC pops on CPI and then gives it back, it is the same range story
• That would signal supply is still sitting overhead and the market is not ready for trend yet
• In that case, we likely rotate back into the mid-range and keep grinding

What I am watching into the close
• Does BTC hold the gains, or does it do the usual vertical selloff after the spike
• Does volume expand on the breakout attempt, not just on the wick
• Where does the weekly structure settle relative to 90k and 94k

What do you think? Are we heading higher? 🤔
原文参照
1年前に$SOL の10,000ドルをETHに交換していたらどうだったでしょうか? -> まだ10,000ドルが残っているはずですが、SOLを保有していた場合、2.2kドル(23%)の損失を被っていました。 💸 -> ETHをSOLに戻して交換していたら71SOLを所有できていたのに、元々の55SOLを保有していたにすぎません。 🚀 ご自身の見解では、なぜSOLがETHに比べてパフォーマンスが劣っていると考えられますか?
1年前に$SOL の10,000ドルをETHに交換していたらどうだったでしょうか?
-> まだ10,000ドルが残っているはずですが、SOLを保有していた場合、2.2kドル(23%)の損失を被っていました。 💸
-> ETHをSOLに戻して交換していたら71SOLを所有できていたのに、元々の55SOLを保有していたにすぎません。 🚀

ご自身の見解では、なぜSOLがETHに比べてパフォーマンスが劣っていると考えられますか?
原文参照
IF $PENGU が $DOGE の時価総額と一致すれば、0.37米ドルになります!🚀 ほぼ+3000%の上昇で、時価総額は230億ドル以上増加します 📈 現在の7億6000万ドルと比べて。 どう思いますか、これって本当に起こるでしょうか? 💸
IF $PENGU $DOGE の時価総額と一致すれば、0.37米ドルになります!🚀 ほぼ+3000%の上昇で、時価総額は230億ドル以上増加します 📈 現在の7億6000万ドルと比べて。
どう思いますか、これって本当に起こるでしょうか? 💸
さらにコンテンツを探すには、ログインしてください
暗号資産関連最新ニュース総まとめ
⚡️ 暗号資産に関する最新のディスカッションに参加
💬 お気に入りのクリエイターと交流
👍 興味のあるコンテンツがきっと見つかります
メール / 電話番号

最新ニュース

--
詳細確認
サイトマップ
Cookieの設定
プラットフォーム利用規約