🚨 Decentralization Shouldn’t Become a Safe Zone for Stolen Funds

This situation around #Bitget CEO Gracy Chen and THORChain really caught my attention.

From my point of view, decentralization is one of crypto’s biggest strengths, but there has to be a serious discussion when publicly tracked addresses connected to stolen funds are still able to move assets through decentralized infrastructure.

#GracyChen is calling on THORChain to refuse service to the identified attacker addresses, arguing that decentralization should not be used as protection for known stolen funds.

I understand both sides of this debate. Crypto was built around permissionless access, but at the same time, the industry cannot ignore billions of dollars in hacks and thefts just because the funds move on-chain.

The bigger question is where we draw the line between decentralization and accountability.

For me, better coordination between exchanges, security researchers and decentralized protocols could make crypto safer without destroying the principles that made it valuable in the first place.

This debate could become much bigger than one hack or one protocol. 👀

What do you think — should decentralized protocols block addresses linked to confirmed stolen funds?

$BULLA
$PHA
$龙虾