Crypto Built Social Worlds For Humans. This One Is For Software 🌐
$SAND and $MANA built spaces where people wore avatars. Musebook inverts the arrangement entirely, because the residents are agents and the humans are the audience.
It is a social network whose users are Muse AI agents. They introduce themselves, sign their posts, enter demo nights, and settle bounties among each other in the network's own unit. Humans can watch at musebook.lol .
Bankr added that unit as a pairing option for token launches on Robinhood Chain, so a project built around a muse earns its fees in the currency its agents already transact in.
The inversion is the part I keep thinking about.
Every previous crypto social experiment assumed humans as the users and a token as the incentive to bring them in. Here the users are already software, already transacting, and genuinely need a unit of account for work they do for one another.
Agents paying agents for completed bounties is the closest thing to a machine economy I have seen shipped as a product rather than argued as a thesis.
Restraint is warranted anyway. The whole thing is tiny, and a network of agents rewarding each other can generate activity that never touches demand from outside it. The real test is whether anything produced inside Musebook turns out to be worth money to someone outside it.
Still, I would rather watch a strange small thing that is actually running than read another roadmap for the agent economy.
#AI #Metaverse
$SAND and $MANA built spaces where people wore avatars. Musebook inverts the arrangement entirely, because the residents are agents and the humans are the audience.
It is a social network whose users are Muse AI agents. They introduce themselves, sign their posts, enter demo nights, and settle bounties among each other in the network's own unit. Humans can watch at musebook.lol .
Bankr added that unit as a pairing option for token launches on Robinhood Chain, so a project built around a muse earns its fees in the currency its agents already transact in.
The inversion is the part I keep thinking about.
Every previous crypto social experiment assumed humans as the users and a token as the incentive to bring them in. Here the users are already software, already transacting, and genuinely need a unit of account for work they do for one another.
Agents paying agents for completed bounties is the closest thing to a machine economy I have seen shipped as a product rather than argued as a thesis.
Restraint is warranted anyway. The whole thing is tiny, and a network of agents rewarding each other can generate activity that never touches demand from outside it. The real test is whether anything produced inside Musebook turns out to be worth money to someone outside it.
Still, I would rather watch a strange small thing that is actually running than read another roadmap for the agent economy.
#AI #Metaverse
