Bitcoin has always had an interesting trade-off.
The network is exceptional at preserving value, but using that value in broader financial applications often means introducing additional trust assumptions.

That's why I think Trustless Bitcoin Vaults (TBV) deserve attention, not because they promise higher yields, but because they're asking a more fundamental question: Can Bitcoin become more useful without asking users to trust more?

What I find interesting is that the conversation isn't centred on replacing Bitcoin's design, It's about extending what native BTC can do while keeping Bitcoin's security model at the core.

After reading about Babylon's approach and exploring the testnet, one thing stands out: the focus isn't simply on borrowing against Bitcoin. It's on building infrastructure that could make native BTC a more active asset in decentralised finance without relying on wrapped representations.

Of course, every new primitive has trade-offs, and the real test will be how TBV performs under real-world conditions and how the user experience evolves through community feedback.

I'm curious to see how @BabylonLabs_io develops this further.
@BabylonLabs_io #baby $BABY