VOLATILITY KING

Ecco gli errori dolorosi che ho commesso (così tu non dovrai) 🧵*
*Impara dalle mie cicatrici, non dalle tue.* 🧠🔥

*1. Inseguire Candele Verdi* 🚀🟥
*Ho comprato BTC a 20k a dicembre 2017... poi l'ho visto crollare a 6k.*
→ FOMO è un killer. Il mercato premia la pazienza, non la ricerca dell'hype.

*Lezione:* Compra nella paura, vendi nell'avidità. Sempre.

---

*2. Tenere Sacchetti fino a Zero* 💼💀
*Ho tenuto altcoin “promettenti” fino a quando non sono letteralmente svanite.*
→ I progetti senza un reale caso d'uso o sviluppatori svaniranno nel tempo.

*Lezione:* Non innamorarti delle tue monete. Se i fondamentali muoiono, così dovrebbe la tua posizione.

You know what's fascinating about competition? It doesn't just create winners and losers—it forces evolution. And right now, watching @Lorenzo Protocol and Pendle circle each other is like witnessing natural selection in real-time.

Both are chasing yield optimization. Both have passionate communities. But they're taking radically different paths to the same destination. And honestly? The divergence tells us everything about where DeFi's actually heading.

The Philosophical Fork

Let me break down the fundamental difference, because it matters. Pendle pioneered yield tokenization—splitting your yield-bearing assets into principal and yield components that trade separately. Brilliant, elegant, and it opened entirely new trading strategies. You could speculate on future yields, hedge positions, and engineer risk profiles that didn't exist before.

Lorenzo's playing a different game entirely. They're building liquid staking derivatives with native Bitcoin integration, focusing on capital efficiency through $BANK and creating composable yield layers that stack. Where Pendle says "separate and trade," Lorenzo says "layer and amplify."

Same problem—extracting maximum value from your assets. Completely different solutions.

The Technical Battleground

Pendle's strength is maturity. They've been battle-tested through multiple market cycles. Their AMM design specifically handles yield tokens' unique properties. Total value locked has weathered volatility and kept climbing. The smart contracts have survived extensive auditing and real-world stress.

But here's where Lorenzo gets interesting: they're building for the next wave. Native Bitcoin yield was barely imaginable when Pendle launched. Cross-chain composability was theoretical. Lorenzo's architecture assumes a multi-chain future where liquidity flows seamlessly and yield strategies compound across ecosystems.

Their $BANK token isn't just governance—it's the connective tissue holding their yield infrastructure together. Stake it, you're not just earning fees; you're participating in protocol-level yield optimization that redistributes value algorithmically.

The Numbers Tell Stories

Pendle's metrics are impressive—billions in TVL, consistent trading volume, established market maker relationships. Their yield markets for stETH, GLP, and other blue-chips have genuine depth. When institutional players want yield exposure, Pendle's often the first call.

Lorenzo's metrics tell a different story: rapid TVL growth from a smaller base, sky-high APYs that scream "early phase," and user acquisition curves that look exponential. They're capturing the risk-tolerant capital chasing asymmetric opportunities. The $BANK holders? They're betting on architecture, not just current yields.

The Honest Challenges

Neither protocol is without scars. Pendle faces the innovator's dilemma—how do you revolutionize when you're the establishment? Their yields, while stable, can't match newer protocols' eye-popping numbers. Growth means competing against their own comfortable position.

Lorenzo's challenges are simpler but more existential: proving longevity. High yields attract mercenary capital that vanishes when better opportunities emerge. Smart contract risk looms larger when you're newer. And integrating Bitcoin yield—technically complex, operationally tricky—could stumble in implementation.

What This Competition Means

Here's why this matters beyond tribal allegiances: competition drives innovation. Pendle's watching Lorenzo and refining strategies. Lorenzo's studying Pendle's playbook and finding gaps. Users? We get better products, more options, and actual choice in how we optimize yield.

This isn't winner-take-all. It's specialization through competition. Pendle might dominate established asset yield markets. Lorenzo could own Bitcoin-native and cross-chain strategies. Both can thrive by being excellent at different things.

The real question isn't "which wins?" It's "which fits your strategy?"

*Compare yourself at @Lorenzo Protocol . governance discussions are live.

#LorenzoProtocol

C'è un'energia particolare nell'aria quando due giganti iniziano a circondarsi. Puoi sentirlo prima degli annunci ufficiali, prima dei comunicati stampa, prima dei thread di Twitter accuratamente coordinati. È esattamente ciò che sta accadendo tra @Injective e Google Cloud in questo momento.

E se stai prestando attenzione, già lo sai: qualcosa di significativo si sta preparando.

I segnali che stiamo vedendo

Lascia che ti colleghi i punti. Google Cloud ha selettivamente collaborato con protocolli blockchain per oltre un anno, ma non sta inseguendo tutti. Sta scegliendo giocate infrastrutturali con serie capacità tecniche. Protocolli che non stanno solo cavalcando cicli di hype ma costruendo architetture che potrebbero scalare legittimamente a miliardi di utenti.

You know that feeling when you stumble onto something early and think, "Wait, is this real?" That's exactly where early $FF stakers are right now—staring at 168% APR and probably refreshing their dashboards just to make sure it's not a glitch.

It's not a glitch. But let me tell you why that number exists, and more importantly, whether it'll last.

The Math Behind the Magic

Here's what's actually happening at @FalconFinance. When protocols launch, they face a classic chicken-and-egg problem: you need liquidity to attract users, but you need users to justify liquidity. Falcon's solving this the old-fashioned way—paying handsomely for early believers.

That 168% APR isn't pulled from thin air. It's a combination of protocol emissions, trading fees, and—here's the key part—a deliberately front-loaded rewards curve. Think of it like a grand opening sale, except instead of discounted products, you're getting supercharged yields for taking the early risk.

Currently, total value locked sits around the lower millions. When TVL is small and emissions are generous, the math gets spicy. Every $FF token staked captures a larger slice of the rewards pie. It's beautiful, it's lucrative, and it's definitely temporary.

Why Early Means Everything

Let me paint the trajectory for you. Right now, maybe a few thousand people know about this. They're staking, compounding, accumulating. But exponential curves work both ways. As more capital floods in—and it will—that 168% starts dropping.

Not because the protocol's failing. Because it's succeeding.

When TVL doubles, your share of emissions gets diluted. When it 10xs, that APR might settle into something more pedestrian—maybe 40%, maybe 60%. Still attractive, but not "quit your day job" attractive. The early stakers? They've already captured the outsized gains while everyone else was sleeping on it.

This isn't speculation. It's mechanical. Historical data from similar launches shows APRs typically compress 60-80% within the first 30-60 days as discovery happens.

The Risks Nobody Mentions

Now for the honest part, because 168% demands scrutiny. High yields attract three things: genuine believers, mercenary capital, and exit liquidity hunters. Falcon's early success depends on which group dominates.

Smart contract risk exists—audits help but aren't bulletproof. Token price volatility could obliterate yield gains if $FF drops 50% while you're staking. And impermanent loss, if you're in liquidity pairs rather than single-sided staking, remains the silent killer it always is.

The governance structure is still maturing. Treasury management conversations are ongoing. The team's transparent about challenges, which I respect, but transparency doesn't eliminate risk—it just illuminates it.

The Window Is Closing

Here's what matters: opportunities like this operate on discovery curves. Right now, we're in the "early adopter" phase. Social metrics show mentions climbing. TVL's ticking upward daily. The flywheel's starting to spin.

If you're reading this and thinking "I'll wait and see," you're probably already late. Not catastrophically late—there's still value to capture. But the asymmetric opportunity? That belongs to people who moved last week.

The Bottom Line

168% APR won't last forever. It's not supposed to. It's jet fuel for ignition, not cruise-altitude economics. Early stakers are being compensated for taking protocol risk when liquidity was thin and the future uncertain.

That compensation is working exactly as designed.

*Check current rates at @Falcon Finance staking dashboard updates in real-time.#FalconFinance

Lasciami dirti qualcosa sulla governance: la maggior parte delle persone la ignora fino a quando non è troppo tardi. Poi si svegliano chiedendosi perché il loro protocollo preferito appare completamente diverso. Non essere quella persona.

Proprio ora, tra dicembre e gennaio, il pipeline delle proposte di @YGGPlay si sta accumulando silenziosamente decisioni che avranno un impatto su tutto l'ecosistema $YGG . E onestamente? Alcune di queste meritano la tua attenzione più dei tuoi aggiornamenti quotidiani sui prezzi.

Perché Questi Due Mesi Sono Importanti

Ecco il punto riguardo alla governance di fine anno: è quando i veri protagonisti fanno le loro mosse. La stagione delle festività significa una riduzione della partecipazione degli elettori, il che paradossalmente rende *il tuo* voto ancora più importante. È anche quando i team portano avanti cambiamenti strategici che hanno pianificato per tutto l'anno: modelli di ricavo, allocazioni di tesoreria, framework di partnership.

Immagina questo: stai dormendo. Le tue posizioni sono sane. Il tuo rapporto collaterale sembra solido. Poi, in meno tempo di quanto ci voglia per cuocere i popcorn nel microonde, tutto è andato.

Non è ipotetico. Questo è ciò che è successo, e ha esposto la singola vulnerabilità più spaventosa in DeFi: il problema dell'oracolo.

L'anatomia di una catastrofe

Lasciami guidarti attraverso quei 43 secondi. Da qualche parte nella rete intricata dei feed di prezzo, un numero è andato storto. Non leggermente storto. *Catastroficamente* storto. Forse era $1.800 invece di $18.000. Forse un punto decimale ha ballato uno spazio troppo a sinistra. Non importa. Ciò che conta è questo: i contratti intelligenti non pongono domande. Non si fermano. Non chiedono verifica umana.

Sai quel momento in cui due cose si incastrano così perfettamente che ti chiedi perché non sia successo prima? È esattamente quello che sta succedendo con Grok e Kite.

Lasciami dipingere un quadro per te. Abbiamo trascorso anni a osservare gli agenti AI inciampare in compiti come bambini che imparano a camminare—promettenti, certo, ma goffi. Avrebbero bisogno di un continuo supporto, passando tra piattaforme, perdendo il contesto a metà conversazione. Era estenuante, onestamente. Ma qui è dove le cose diventano interessanti.

Il Problema Che Non Sapevamo Di Avere

Immagina un vigile guardiano, appollaiato sul bordo della blockchain, che sussurra verità dal caos del mondo oltre—prezzi, rendimenti, realtà. Questo è l'oracolo nella DeFi, il ponte tra codice e commercio. Ma cosa succede se quel sussurro si trasforma in una menzogna? Un singolo feed falsificato, e gli imperi crollano. Dalle tentative scintille del 2016 alle fiammate incessanti del 2025, i dati cattivi dell'oracolo hanno prosciugato 8,4 miliardi di dollari dalla finanza decentralizzata, come un veleno lento che si insinua attraverso vene dorate. È un motivo che risuona: fidati dei dati, o guardali disintegrarsi.

Lasciami dirti qualcosa che la maggior parte delle gilde di gioco non ammetterà: si prendono troppo sul serio. Documenti infiniti su "economia di gioco sostenibile." Linguaggio aziendale su "percorsi di onboarding strutturati." Dichiarazioni di missione che sembrano tesi di MBA. E nel frattempo, i veri giocatori—le persone che hanno fatto esplodere il play-to-earn—sono altrove, a divertirsi realmente.

@YGGPlay ha capito questo presto. La loro filosofia fondamentale? Divertimento Degen. Due parole che suonano spericolate ma rappresentano in realtà qualcosa di molto più sofisticato di quanto i dirigenti realizzino.

C'è un momento nella vita di ogni protocollo che separa la teoria dalla realtà. Per @FalconFinance, quel momento è arrivato silenziosamente—niente coriandoli, nessun annuncio appariscente—solo un numero che superava 1000 sul dashboard del mainnet. Mille coniazioni di USDF. Mille occasioni in cui utenti reali, rischiando capitale reale, hanno deciso che questo stablecoin valeva la pena di essere fidato.

E se capisci cosa significa veramente, vedrai perché il denaro intelligente sta prestando attenzione.

Perché questo numero è importante

Siamo onesti—lanciare un stablecoin nel 2024 sembra quasi assurdo. Abbiamo visto USDT dominare grazie a un netto vantaggio del primo arrivato. Abbiamo assistito all'implosione spettacolare di UST, portando con sé miliardi di valore. Abbiamo visto i regolatori circolare come falchi e i trader esperti sviluppare PTSD da stablecoin. Quindi, quando Falcon Finance ha annunciato USDF, la domanda immediata non era "le persone lo conieranno?" Era "perché qualcuno dovrebbe coniarlo?"

You've got your $INJ tokens. You've heard about staking rewards. But you're staring at Keplr wallet like it's written in ancient hieroglyphics, wondering where to even begin. I get it—the first time feels like navigating a spaceship cockpit. But here's the truth: once you stake $INJ successfully, you'll wonder why you waited so long.

Let me walk you through this, person to person, no jargon walls between us.

Why Keplr? Why Now?

First, understand what you're actually doing. @Injective runs on its own blockchain, and $INJ staking secures that network while rewarding you for participation. Keplr isn't just a wallet—it's your gateway to the entire Cosmos ecosystem, where Injective lives. Think of it as your Swiss Army knife for interchain DeFi.

Current staking APRs hover around 15-18%, though this fluctuates based on network inflation and total staked supply. Miss a week, and that's yield evaporating into thin air. So let's get you operational.

Setting Up: The Foundation

Download Keplr from the official site—browser extension for desktop, mobile app for phones. Fake versions lurk in the wild, so verify you're on keplr.app. Create your wallet, and here's where people make their first mistake: they screenshot their seed phrase or store it in cloud notes. Don't. Write it physically on paper. Hide it like your life savings depend on it, because frankly, they do.

Once you've secured that phrase, fund your Keplr wallet with $INJ . Send from your exchange—Binance, Coinbase, wherever you're holding. Double-check the network (Injective mainnet, not Ethereum), triple-check the address. Blockchain transactions are irreversible. One wrong character, and your tokens vanish into the void.

The Staking Process: Where Magic Happens

Open Keplr, navigate to the Injective chain. You'll see your balance. Click "Stake." A list of validators appears—dozens of them, each with different commission rates, uptime records, voting participation. This matters more than you think.

Low commission seems attractive, but uptime and reliability trump everything. A validator that's offline during critical network updates? You miss rewards. I typically look for validators with 5-7% commission, 99%+ uptime, active governance participation. These aren't just miners—they're network stewards. Choose wisely.

Select your validator, enter the amount you want to stake (leave a small buffer for transaction fees), and confirm. Boom. You're officially a network participant.

The 21-Day Reality Check

Here's what they don't advertise upfront: unstaking takes 21 days. It's called the unbonding period, and it exists for network security. During those three weeks, your tokens are locked—no trading, no moving, no panic-selling during market chaos. For some, this feels restrictive. For long-term believers, it's forced diamond hands.

Rewards accumulate immediately, visible in your Keplr dashboard. You can claim and restake them—compounding your position over time. Smart stakers do this weekly or monthly, letting exponential growth work its magic.

The Community Edge

Active $INJ stakers gain governance voting rights. Proposals appear regularly—treasury spending, protocol upgrades, ecosystem partnerships. Your stake gives you voice. Participate. The most profitable stakers aren't passive spectators—they're engaged community members shaping the protocol's future.

Staking INJ on Keplr isn't complicated. It's just unfamiliar. But now? You've got the map. Time to claim your rewards.

#injective

@Injective

Let's talk about something everyone's watching but few truly understand—the veBANK APR on @LorenzoProtocol. Right now, you're probably seeing numbers that make you do a double-take. Maybe 47%. Maybe 63%. Maybe higher, depending on when you're reading this. But here's what nobody tells you: that percentage alone means nothing without context.

And context? That's where the real story lives.

Decoding the Rate: Why It Fluctuates

Think of APR like a river's current—constantly moving, shaped by forces upstream. When $BANK holders lock their tokens for veBANK (vote-escrowed BANK), they're essentially removing supply from circulation while earning protocol revenue share. The APR you see reflects real-time protocol performance divided by total locked value.

Here's where it gets interesting: Lorenzo Protocol generates yield through Bitcoin staking derivatives. When BTC network activity surges—more transactions, higher fees, increased staking demand—protocol revenue climbs. That revenue flows directly to veBANK holders. So that APR isn't arbitrary. It's a living metric tied to actual economic activity in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Last month, we saw APRs spike to 71% during a period of heightened BTC volatility. Why? Trading volume exploded, liquidations generated fees, and Lorenzo's liquidity positions captured that momentum. The protocol made money. veBANK holders made money. Simple as that.

The Lock-Up Dynamic

But there's a catch—and it's actually a feature, not a bug. veBANK requires time commitment. Lock for six months, you get baseline voting power and APR share. Lock for four years? Maximum weight, maximum returns. This creates fascinating game theory.

When markets pump and speculation runs hot, impatient capital rushes toward shorter locks, chasing liquidity over yield. The whales who lock long-term during these periods? They're claiming disproportionate shares of protocol revenue with less competition. I've watched wallets locking hundred-thousand-dollar positions for max duration during market frenzies, betting that patience pays exponentially.

They're usually right.

Comparing the Landscape

How does veBANK stack up against alternatives? Traditional DeFi yields hover around 8-15% for stablecoins, 12-25% for blue-chip protocols. But those lack Bitcoin exposure. veBANK gives you BTC ecosystem upside *plus* yield. You're not just earning interest—you're capturing fees from the largest, most liquid crypto asset in existence.

Curve's veCRV model pioneered this mechanism. veBANK adapts it for Bitcoin DeFi. The precedent is proven; the innovation is bringing it to BTC infrastructure.

The Sustainability Question

Let's address the elephant in the room: can these rates last? Honestly? They'll compress as TVL grows. That's healthy protocol maturation. But Lorenzo's revenue streams—staking derivatives, liquid staking tokens, BTC liquidity provisioning—aren't temporary incentives. They're structural yield generation.

Early lockers today are banking peak rates while establishing governance positions. As the protocol scales and APRs normalize to sustainable levels, they'll still hold outsized influence and compounded gains.

The Real Calculation

Check current veBANK APR, yes. But calculate what that means for *your* position size, *your* lock duration, *your* conviction in Bitcoin's institutional adoption trajectory.

Because those numbers on the dashboard? They're not promises. They're reflections of right now—and opportunities for those paying attention.

$BANK

#LorenzoProtocol

@Lorenzo Protocol

Immagina questo: hai i tuoi $KITE tokens seduti nel tuo portafoglio, che non fanno nulla. Nel frattempo, altri possessori stanno guadagnando il doppio—talvolta il triplo—di quello che potresti guadagnare tu, semplicemente perché comprendono il gioco. La differenza tra puntare casualmente e puntare strategicamente non riguarda solo la fortuna. Riguarda sapere quali leve tirare.

Lasciami guidarti attraverso ciò che muove realmente l'ago.

La Fondazione: Comprendere la tua Posizione

Ecco la cosa che la maggior parte delle persone perde: le ricompense di staking non riguardano solo quanto blocchi. Riguardano *quando* punti, *dove* punti e *per quanto tempo* ti impegni. Pensalo come interessi composti su steroidi. Il protocollo premia coloro che dimostrano convinzione, che segnalano di essere qui per il lungo periodo, non per un rapido guadagno.

There's this moment in every tokenomics discussion where someone mentions "flywheel effects" and everyone nods knowingly while secretly wondering if it's just fancy marketing speak. I used to be skeptical too—until I watched Lorenzo Protocol's veBANK mechanism actually demonstrate what a genuine economic flywheel looks like.

Let me break down how buybacks transform from simple token burns into something considerably more interesting.

The Setup That Makes Everything Possible

Lorenzo Protocol generates revenue through liquid staking services—users deposit assets, receive liquid tokens, Lorenzo deploys those assets productively and captures yield. Standard DeFi playbook so far. But here's where veBANK ($BANK ) enters differently.

Instead of distributing all protocol revenue to token holders or reinvesting entirely into operations, Lorenzo allocates a percentage specifically for $BANK buybacks from open markets. These purchased tokens don't disappear into burn addresses. They get redistributed to veBANK holders—people who've locked their $BANK tokens for extended periods to gain governance rights and boosted rewards.

See the mechanism forming? Let me show you how it accelerates.

Spin One: Buyback Pressure

Protocol revenue flows in continuously from staking operations. As that revenue converts to $BANK purchases, it creates persistent buy pressure regardless of market conditions. When prices drop, the same revenue buys more tokens. When prices rise, existing holders see value appreciation. Either direction benefits the system.

This isn't revolutionary alone—plenty of projects buy back tokens. The flywheel starts spinning when you connect what happens next.

Spin Two: Locking Incentives

Those bought-back tokens redistribute exclusively to veBANK holders. Suddenly there's concrete incentive to lock your BANK rather than keeping it liquid. Lock your tokens, participate in governance, receive a share of continuous buybacks. The longer your lock period, typically the higher your reward multiplier.

As more holders lock tokens into veBANK positions, circulating supply contracts. Fewer tokens available for trading means reduced sell pressure and increased scarcity. Simple supply-demand dynamics working in holders' favor.

Spin Three: Compounding Dynamics

Here's where it gets self-reinforcing. As $BANK price appreciates from reduced supply and consistent buybacks, Lorenzo's total value locked becomes more attractive. Higher TVL generates more protocol revenue. More revenue means larger buyback allocations. Larger buybacks increase rewards to veBANK holders, incentivizing more locking, further reducing supply.

Each component feeds the next. It's not circular reasoning—it's circular *reinforcement*. The system strengthens itself through participation.

The Governance Lever

There's an additional dimension most people miss. veBANK holders govern protocol parameters—which assets to support, fee structures, strategic partnerships. This governance power becomes increasingly valuable as the protocol grows, creating non-financial incentives to acquire and lock tokens beyond just yield.

Effective governance attracts better partnerships, which increases TVL, which generates more revenue, which funds larger buybacks. The flywheel spins on multiple axes simultaneously.

Where the Friction Lives

Of course, flywheels can spin in reverse. If TVL drops significantly, revenue decreases, buybacks shrink, rewards diminish, and unlocking pressure builds. The mechanism amplifies in both directions—that's the nature of reflexive systems.

Lorenzo's bet is that liquid staking demand grows faster than any temporary market turbulence. That real utility drives sustainable revenue, making the flywheel resilient through volatility rather than fragile.

The Honest Truth

What makes veBANK's flywheel compelling isn't complexity—it's elegant simplicity. Revenue generates buybacks, buybacks reward lockers, locking reduces supply, scarcity attracts capital, capital generates revenue.

Round and round it goes, accelerating with each rotation, as long as that foundational revenue keeps flowing.

#LorenzoProtocol

@Lorenzo Protocol

Sai quel momento in cui tutti parlano di un progetto e tu stai ancora cercando di capire quale scambio lo elenchi? Ci sono passato più volte di quanto mi piacerebbe ammettere. Quindi, facciamo chiarezza e facciamo in modo che tu tenga $INJ —il token nativo di Injective—attraverso Binance, il percorso più diretto per la maggior parte delle persone.

Niente sovraccarico di gergo. Nessuna conoscenza presupposta. Solo i passaggi effettivi.

Perché Binance, perché ora

Prima di immergerci nella meccanica, il contesto è importante. Injective Protocol ha costruito silenziosamente uno degli ecosistemi DeFi più tecnicamente sofisticati nel crypto—derivati cross-chain, scambi decentralizzati con orderbook, zero commissioni di gas. Il tipo di infrastruttura che rende ovvie le limitazioni di Ethereum in modo doloroso.

Lasciami raccontarti del momento in cui ho realmente capito i meccanismi di buyback-and-burn. Non è stato leggendo whitepaper o guardando video esplicativi—è stato osservare la fornitura di token di Falcon Finance $FF ridursi in tempo reale mentre il tesoro cresceva simultaneamente più forte.

Quella contraddizione? È l'intero punto.

Il problema che questo risolve

La maggior parte dei progetti crypto viene lanciata con forniture fisse o inflazionistiche, poi si chiede perché il valore del token stagna nonostante l'adozione crescente. È Economia 101 al contrario: l'aumento dell'utilità incontra una fornitura costante o in espansione, creando una pressione al ribasso permanente sui prezzi. I detentori osservano la diluizione della loro percentuale di possesso. I primi credenti vengono puniti per la loro lealtà.

Quindi ecco una domanda che rimbalza nella mia testa ultimamente: cosa succede quando una delle più grandi gilde del gioco Web3 decide di impegnarsi seriamente nell'infrastruttura?

Questo è essenzialmente ciò che stiamo osservando svilupparsi con il momento di attenzione di SupDAO: la loro integrazione con Yield Guild Games che crea quella che potrebbe essere la struttura parallela più interessante nella governance dei giochi decentralizzati. E credetemi, questo conta più di quanto sembri.

La Storia che Imposta Tutto

Yield Guild Games ha rivoluzionato l'economia del gioco per guadagnare. Non erano solo una gilda; sono diventati il modello di come le comunità potessero possedere, gestire e trarre profitto dagli asset di gioco. Studiosi guadagnando attraverso NFT presi in prestito, diversificazione del tesoro attraverso più giochi, subDAO locali che gestiscono operazioni regionali: YGG ha scritto il manuale che tutti gli altri hanno copiato.