After months of work, I’ve leveraged AI to craft 3 BTC futures quant signals, and today they’re officially open for subscription.
Each strategy has its own role: · SYS03 EMA Triple Pulse — Tracks mid-term trend waves, with 54 trades over the past year, profit factor of 1.46 · SYS05 Volatility Energy Breakout — Bollinger Bands + Keltner Double Compression, capturing energy explosions, profit factor of 1.49 · SYS06 RSI Divergence Reversal — Only 15 trades in the past year, win rate of 66.67%, profit factor of 3.57, with a max drawdown of just 0.25%
All backtested on TradingView, so you can replicate the numbers yourself, no need to take my word for it.
Each signal includes: ✓ Real-time annotations for entry direction + SL / TP levels ✓ TradingView alerts pushed directly, getting notified of entry price / stop-loss / take-profit without having to watch the charts ✓ Backtest version for historical performance verification
Background: Former KOL team & CEX researcher, now independently developing trading systems.
If you're interested, DM me on X (Twitter) to learn about the subscription options, spots are limited, first come, first served.
Today a reader asked me: “How do you manage not to watch the charts?”
I said: “Because I clearly know that watching the charts won’t make me earn a single extra cent.”
The system has already told me where to enter, where to place the stop-loss, and where the target is.
The rest is just waiting.
Many people think that “serious trading” = staring at the candlestick chart every day. In fact, real seriousness is when you have no signal— being disciplined enough to do nothing.
Waiting is a position. Not moving is the strategy.
When was the last time you ‘restrained yourself and didn’t act’?
During the time when I was working as a KOL, I wasn’t actually happy.
Every day I had to produce “professional-looking” content. Speaking honestly—sometimes the direction wasn’t really that clear, but the platform still needed you to present “a clear point of view.”
After a while, you wouldn’t know whether you were analyzing—or just performing analysis.
Later, I stepped back and returned to independent trading.
At first my income was lower, but I could sleep at night.
Now, every post I share on the square is my real observations and my operation logs— all the gains and losses, I post them too.
Not many people do this, but I think this is the right way.
All three EMA moving averages must be aligned in the same direction, and the momentum indicator must confirm in sync before a signal is triggered.
Why so strict?
Because I’ve seen too many people enter trades when they just “feel like it’s going up,” then watch the direction reverse—yet they end up holding on because there’s “no clear stop-loss level,” and they get wiped out.
SYS03’s strict conditions are designed to filter out these “looks-like” false signals.
Do less, but every time there’s a reason.
On TradingView, search for SYS03 and you can run your own backtests.
Market Weekly Report | What is BTC telling us this week?
Overall, BTC this week has shown a high-level consolidation pattern. Volume gradually shrank, indicating both bulls and bears are waiting.
Typically, this kind of formation ends in two ways: 1. Volume suddenly expands → a direction is chosen 2. Continue ranging until an external catalyst appears
My current view: before the direction is clear, keep observing.
Once confirmed, that’s the most effortless approach.
The market is always there, and opportunities come every week. But your mindset is the most important asset you have.
When your mindset is unstable—everything you look at becomes an opportunity, and the results turn into traps. When your mindset is steady—when opportunities come, you can see clearly.
If you could go back to the first day of trading, what would you most want to tell yourself?
My answer:
“Learn position/risk management first, then learn technical analysis.”
Most people do it in the opposite order—learn candlesticks, indicators, and patterns first. You might be able to see the direction correctly, but you still end up losing money.
The reason is: you haven’t done risk management.
Even if you only have a 60% win rate, paired with a 2R risk-reward ratio, profitable expectation over the long run is still possible.
Traded for five years—the one thing that cost me the most in tuition:
It wasn’t misreading the direction. It wasn’t picking the wrong coin.
It was trading based on emotion when I didn’t have a system.
When the market looked good: I’d carry heavy positions, feeling like a genius. When things turned worse: I’d frequently switch directions, stop out and immediately flip, and end up getting hit on both sides.
During that period, I went back through my trade records— When I made money, I always had a reason. When I lost money, I also always had a reason.
The issue isn’t whether the reasons are right or wrong— I just didn’t have a consistent framework to restrain myself.
Later, I forced myself to become systematic— No matter how strong my feelings were, if there was no signal, I wouldn’t move.
It was painful for a while, but the results became stable.
With a system versus without one, the gap after five years isn’t in returns—it’s in mindset.
In early 2024, BTC surged with heavy volume near 58,000.
A friend of mine checks charts every day and tells me, “Wait—let’s see for a bit longer, until the signal is clearer.”
When it rose to 62,000: “It’s moving too fast. Wait for a pullback.”
When it hit 68,000: “Buy after it pulls back. No rush.”
When it reached 73,000: “I couldn’t stand it anymore—I FOMO’d and chased in.”
Then BTC started to correct and fell back to 60,000.
He said he wasn’t losing those amounts of money— he was losing this: He saw the opportunity at 58,000, but because he kept waiting for a “more certain signal,” he missed the best entry.
I asked him, “What are you waiting for?” He said, “A signal that won’t be wrong.” I said, “That kind of signal doesn’t exist.”
In trading, “waiting for something more certain” often ends up delivering a “higher cost.”
When I built my first quantitative trading system, I stepped into three pitfalls.
Pitfall 1: Overfitting Backtests looked unbelievably great, but once I went live, it all fell apart. Reason: I tuned the parameters too precisely to match the historical data.
Pitfall 2: Ignoring trading fees In backtests I earned 50 bucks per trade, but after fees on live trading I only had 15 bucks left. My returns were cut by 70% straight away.
Pitfall 3: No stop-loss logic “Quant systems won’t do anything reckless.” Until one market move wiped out 20% in a single wave—I realized quant systems can still blow up.
The SYS series was built slowly after I’d stepped into these three pitfalls. Without pitfalls, there would be no system.
Market Weekly Report | What is BTC telling us this week?
Overall, this week BTC shows a high-level consolidation pattern. Trading volume gradually shrinks, indicating both bulls and bears are waiting.
Typically, there are two ways this formation ends: 1. Trading volume suddenly expands → a direction is chosen 2. Continue ranging until an external catalyst appears
My current judgment: before the direction is clear, keep observing.
Once confirmed, it’s the most effortless approach.
Now BTC suddenly surged 5%. What’s your first reaction?
A. Buy immediately—I don’t want to miss out B. Wait for a pullback to enter C. First check the volume/market activity, then decide D. Do nothing, wait for system signals
There’s no standard answer, but your choice will tell me what kind of trader you are.
Leave a comment about your pick, and I’ll analyze it.
Someone said: “I’m always getting liquidated, or on my way to getting liquidated. I just want to learn from you.”
That line made me think for a long time.
Because I’ve walked that road too. I know that feeling—resetting to zero again and again, and telling yourself “next time for sure.”
But his sentence—“I’m not that greedy, I just want to learn”— In a market full of leverage dreams, the person who can say that has already won half the mindset battle.
The ones who truly manage to survive in the market are never the smartest or the most willing to take big gambles.
It’s the most low-key, the one who’s most willing to admit when they’re wrong.
If you’re also on the way, leave a comment and tell me which stage you’re stuck at.