Bit_boy

Lo sviluppo del calcolo quantistico potrebbe distruggere la rete Bitcoin
Ho ricercato tutti i dati e ho imparato tutto al riguardo.
/➮ Recentemente, BlackRock ci ha avvertito sui potenziali rischi per la rete Bitcoin
🕷 Tutto a causa dei rapidi progressi nel campo del calcolo quantistico.
🕷 Aggiungerò il loro rapporto alla fine - ma per ora, cerchiamo di capire cosa significa realmente.
/➮ La sicurezza di Bitcoin si basa su algoritmi crittografici, principalmente l'ECDSA
🕷 Protegge le chiavi private e garantisce l'integrità delle transazioni

I pattern candlestick sono uno strumento potente nell'analisi tecnica, offrendo spunti sul sentiment del mercato e sui potenziali movimenti dei prezzi. Riconoscendo e interpretando questi pattern, i trader possono prendere decisioni informate e aumentare le loro possibilità di successo. In questo articolo, esploreremo 20 pattern candlestick essenziali, fornendo una guida completa per aiutarti a migliorare la tua strategia di trading e potenzialmente guadagnare $ 1000 al mese.
Comprendere i modelli di candele
Prima di immergersi nei pattern, è essenziale comprendere le basi dei grafici a candela. Ogni candela rappresenta un intervallo di tempo specifico, mostrando i prezzi di apertura, massimo, minimo e chiusura. Il corpo della candela mostra il movimento dei prezzi, mentre gli stoppini indicano i prezzi massimi e minimi.

Every once in a while I come across a project that makes me pause and think, “okay, this is actually different.” Not different in the marketing sense, but different in the way it approaches the future. That’s the feeling I get whenever I look into Vanar. It doesn’t feel like just another Layer 1 chasing speed metrics or cheaper fees. It feels like it’s building for an entirely new kind of internet experience.
When I think about where things are heading, it’s obvious to me that the next wave isn’t just finance or DeFi. It’s entertainment powered by AI. Games that feel alive. Worlds that react to you. Characters that learn from you. Stories that change every time you play. And honestly, most blockchains today don’t even come close to supporting that kind of reality. They’re still optimizing for token transfers while the world is moving toward intelligent, interactive systems.
That’s where Vanar starts to make sense to me.
The part that really clicked for me is their Neutron layer. Anyone who has touched AI tools knows how heavy they are. Models need real compute power and fast responses. Trying to cram all of that directly onto a blockchain just sounds like a recipe for lag and high costs. I’ve seen other chains try it and it always feels clunky.
Vanar doesn’t force everything onchain. Instead, it lets the AI logic run offchain while still anchoring verification and settlement back to the chain. To me, that feels practical and realistic. You get the flexibility and speed AI needs without sacrificing trust. It’s the kind of balance that makes me think, “yeah, this is how it probably should be done.”
When I imagine what developers could build with that setup, it gets exciting fast. Games where NPCs actually remember what you did. Storylines that evolve instead of repeating the same script. AI companions that feel personal instead of scripted. These aren’t just cool demos. They’re the kinds of experiences people actually want to spend time in. And for the first time, it feels technically possible on a network designed for it.
But raw tech isn’t enough. I have learned that the biggest blocker in Web3 is almost always the user experience. Wallets, seed phrases, bridges, confusing pop-ups — all of it scares normal users away. Even I get tired of it sometimes. If entertainment is supposed to go mainstream, it can’t feel like a science experiment.
That’s why I like what Vanar is doing with Kayon. The goal seems simple: make everything feel like a normal app. Hide the complexity. Let people just play, create, and interact without thinking about the blockchain underneath. Personally, I think that’s the only way this space ever reaches millions of users. The tech should be invisible.
Another thing I keep noticing is how naturally Vanar fits creators and studios. Entertainment teams don’t want to become blockchain engineers. They just want tools that work. They want performance, stability, and something that won’t break when thousands of players show up at once. For years, most chains couldn’t offer that, which is why a lot of studios stayed away from Web3 entirely.
Vanar feels like one of the first ecosystems actually built with them in mind. Not as an afterthought, but as the main audience.
The timing also feels right to me. AI is moving from hype to real usage. People aren’t just talking about models anymore; they’re actually using intelligent features every day. Apps are getting smarter. Games are getting more dynamic. Digital life is starting to feel more alive. To support that, we need infrastructure that understands both AI and blockchain, not just one or the other.
Vanar seems to sit exactly at that intersection.
What I appreciate most is that it doesn’t feel rushed or overly loud. The progress looks steady. Integrations, tools, experiments, small releases. It feels like a team focused on building something solid rather than chasing headlines. Over time, I have started trusting that approach more than big promises.
When I zoom out, I don’t see Vanar as just another chain. I see it as a foundation for a new kind of digital world, one where AI, games, and ownership blend together naturally. And honestly, that future feels much more exciting to me than another DeFi dashboard or faster token swaps.
If the next generation of the internet is going to be interactive, intelligent, and entertainment-driven, then we’ll need networks designed specifically for that scale. From what I can see, Vanar is one of the few actually building with that mindset. That’s why I keep coming back to it. It feels less like a trend and more like a glimpse of what’s coming next.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY #VanarChain

When I first started paying attention to Plasma, it did not feel like one of those projects trying to grab attention with loud promises or flashy announcements. It felt quieter than that. Almost understated. The more I looked into it, the more I got the sense that it wasn’t trying to impress anyone today. It was trying to quietly build something that would still matter years from now.
I have seen a lot of chains market themselves as faster or cheaper, but Plasma feels different to me because it focuses on something more practical: actually moving money in a way that feels reliable. When I think about sending payments, especially stablecoins, I don’t want drama. I don’t want to wonder if my transaction is stuck or if I need to wait for five confirmations. I just want to press send and be done. With Plasma’s sub-second settlement, that’s exactly the experience I imagine. It feels closer to using a banking app than using a blockchain.
Privacy is another part that really stands out to me. I have never liked the idea that every single transaction I make could be visible to the whole world. It’s not about hiding anything. It’s about basic comfort and safety. Businesses don’t want competitors tracking their payments. Regular people don’t want strangers analyzing their spending habits. Institutions can’t expose their financial flows. Plasma seems to understand this human side of money. It treats privacy as something normal and necessary, not suspicious.
The gasless stablecoin transfers honestly feel like one of those small details that make a huge difference. I remember how confusing crypto felt when I first started. Having to buy another token just to pay fees was such unnecessary friction. If I can send stablecoins without worrying about gas at all, it removes one more barrier. It makes the whole thing feel simpler and more welcoming, especially for someone new.
What I also like is how Plasma One is designed. From what I’ve seen, it doesn’t feel like a typical crypto wallet with complicated buttons and jargon everywhere. It feels more like a normal fintech app. Something my friends or family could use without me explaining what a network or gas fee is. To me, that’s what real adoption looks like. The blockchain should stay in the background while the experience feels natural and familiar.
The licensing approach makes sense to me too. Most businesses don’t want to become blockchain experts. They just want payments to work. They want something stable, compliant, and easy to integrate. Plasma seems to offer them a ready-made foundation instead of forcing them to learn everything from scratch. That feels realistic. Not every company wants to run nodes or think about validators. They just want infrastructure that quietly does its job.
With regulation tightening around the world, I have started noticing that only the serious projects are going to survive. Governments are paying closer attention, and companies can’t afford to take risks anymore. Plasma feels like it was designed with that future in mind. It tries to balance privacy with compliance, which isn’t easy to do. But that balance is probably what the real world actually needs.
The more I think about it, the more Plasma feels less like “just another blockchain” and more like a payment rail. Something invisible that people don’t even realize they’re using. Stablecoins are already becoming everyday money for a lot of people, but the networks behind them still feel clunky and outdated. High fees, slow confirmations, poor onboarding. Plasma seems to address those problems in a straightforward way without overcomplicating things.
There’s something refreshing about a project that doesn’t chase hype. I find myself trusting teams more when they focus on fundamentals instead of noise. Fast settlement, privacy, simple user experience, real integrations. These things might not trend on social media, but they’re what actually matter when real people start using a system every day.
When I look at Plasma now, I don’t see a chain trying to compete for attention. I see infrastructure quietly forming in the background. If stablecoins really do become the default way we move money online, then networks like Plasma could end up shaping how digital finance works for millions of people. And honestly, I like that it’s happening quietly. It feels more real, more grounded, and more built for the long term.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL

Lately I have noticed something about how we talk about crypto. Most conversations revolve around prices, trends, or whatever narrative is hot that week. But almost no one talks about the actual plumbing of global finance. The boring, invisible layer where trillions move every day. The part that isn’t exciting but quietly decides how everything really works.
The more I learned about it, the more I realized that this backend is incredibly outdated. And that’s exactly why Dusk caught my attention. It feels like one of those projects that isn’t trying to be loud or trendy. It’s just trying to fix a problem most people don’t even realize exists.
When I started digging into traditional securities markets, I was honestly surprised. Stocks, bonds, and corporate instruments don’t just move freely. They rely on these entities called Central Securities Depositories that sit in the middle and keep the official records of ownership. At first glance, that sounds fine. Organized. Safe. But when you look closer, it’s messy.
In Europe alone there are more than twenty separate CSDs across different markets. Each one runs its own system. Its own database. Its own rules and integrations. Instead of one clean network, it’s like a patchwork of disconnected silos. Every time money or assets try to move between them, friction shows up. Delays show up. Costs show up.
The numbers make it even crazier to me. Hundreds of trillions of euros worth of securities are settled every year, yet cross-border settlement is still tiny. Not because there’s no demand, but because the infrastructure simply can’t handle it efficiently. We’re talking about systems that still operate on T+2 settlement, where trades take days to finalize. In a world where I can send a message across the planet instantly, waiting days for ownership to update feels almost absurd.
For a long time, I think the industry just accepted this as “the way things are.” There wasn’t a real alternative that institutions could trust or regulators would approve. That’s where Dusk started to make sense to me.
What I find different is that Dusk isn’t trying to slap tokens on top of the old system. It’s not saying, “let’s wrap these assets and mirror them onchain.” Instead, it asks a more direct question: what if the asset simply existed onchain from the start?
That idea of native issuance really changed how I think about it. If a security is created directly on the blockchain and legally recognized there, you don’t need multiple ledgers or custodians reconciling everything. There’s no constant matching between systems. The chain becomes the source of truth. Settlement can happen in seconds instead of days. Capital doesn’t sit frozen waiting to clear.
But speed alone isn’t enough, especially for institutions. One thing I’ve learned is that serious financial players will never use fully transparent chains for regulated assets. No bank or fund wants their entire portfolio visible to the public. I wouldn’t want that either. Privacy isn’t about hiding wrongdoing. It’s about basic operational safety.
That’s another reason Dusk feels practical to me. By integrating zero-knowledge proofs, participants can prove they’re allowed to trade without exposing everything about themselves. It’s a middle ground that actually makes sense: compliant but private. Transparent where it needs to be, confidential where it matters.
I also like that Dusk isn’t fighting regulators or trying to dodge the rules. It’s aligning with them. Working within European frameworks like MiFID and MiCA instead of pretending regulation doesn’t exist. That approach feels more sustainable. Real markets don’t run on rebellion. They run on compliance.
And when I see things like licensed exchanges and regulated institutions actually building on Dusk, it stops feeling theoretical. It’s not just a whitepaper idea. It’s real companies with real licenses preparing to use this as infrastructure. That makes it feel grounded and credible to me.
The more I step back, the more I realize how big this opportunity actually is. Securities markets move hundreds of trillions every year. Even a small shift in how settlement works could change everything. Yet most of crypto is still focused on short-term speculation. Charts. Memes. Hype cycles.
Meanwhile, projects like Dusk are quietly rebuilding the rails that institutions might eventually depend on every single day.
Personally, I find that more interesting than any trend. Because when the backend changes, everything on top changes with it. If financial markets really move onchain in a serious way, the protocols that handle regulated settlement, privacy, and compliance will matter far more than the loudest tokens on social media.
That’s why I keep coming back to Dusk. It doesn’t feel flashy. It feels necessary. Like it’s solving a decades-old inefficiency that everyone tolerated simply because there wasn’t a better option.
If blockchain is going to power real finance, not just speculation, it has to look a lot like this: native assets, instant settlement, built-in privacy, and rules that institutions can actually live with. From what I see, Dusk is quietly building exactly that. And sometimes the quiet builders end up shaping the future the most.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK

Over the past year I’ve started noticing something that doesn’t get talked about enough in Web3. Everyone debates tokens, narratives, and price action, but almost no one talks about where all the data actually lives. And the more I look at modern apps, the more obvious it feels to me that storage, not speculation, is becoming the real bottleneck.
A few years ago, decentralized storage felt like an afterthought. It was mostly used for NFT metadata or small files that didn’t really stress the system. Nothing mission-critical. Nothing that millions of people depended on at the same time. But that world is gone now. The apps being built today are heavier, faster, and far more demanding. AI models are huge. Games ship massive assets. Media platforms move ridiculous amounts of data every second. Suddenly, the old storage approaches just feel fragile.
That’s what pulled me toward Walrus. The more I read about it, the more it felt like someone finally designed storage for the kind of internet we actually use, not the one we had three years ago.
What clicked for me was how Walrus handles files. Instead of treating a file as one big object sitting in one place, it breaks everything into small encoded pieces called slivers and spreads them across the network. At first that sounded technical and abstract, but when I thought about it practically, it made perfect sense. If data comes from many places at once, performance doesn’t collapse when one part slows down. It becomes steadier and more predictable.
As a user, I don’t care how clever the architecture is. I just want things to load instantly. And as a builder, I’d want something even simpler: consistency. I don’t want storage that’s fast on good days and terrible on bad days. That unpredictability kills products. When an app feels slow, users don’t blame the storage layer. They just leave.
Walrus seems built around that exact pain point. It feels less like experimental crypto tech and more like a reliable cloud system, except decentralized and verifiable. That combination feels rare. And honestly, when something just works, developers don’t make a big announcement about it. They just quietly adopt it.
I also like that it’s tied into the Sui ecosystem. Fast confirmations and smooth handling of onchain objects make a lot of sense for data-heavy applications. When I picture the kind of apps people are building now, things that feel like real products instead of demos, this setup feels much closer to what they actually need.
What really stands out to me is how Walrus is growing without noise. There’s no constant hype or marketing circus. It feels more organic. Builders use it because their apps perform better, not because of a trend. And once a team builds their entire performance layer on top of a storage network, switching away isn’t easy. That’s when something stops being a tool and starts becoming infrastructure.
When I look around the industry, everything points in the same direction. AI is getting bigger. Games are more complex. Social apps expect real-time responsiveness. Media platforms have to deliver huge files instantly. Enterprises want data they can verify without trusting a single company. None of this works well on weak or inconsistent storage.
So to me, it’s obvious that Web3 can’t scale on yesterday’s foundations. We need a new backbone. And Walrus feels like one of the few projects actually preparing for that reality instead of pretending the old systems are fine.
Even when I think about the token side, it feels different from pure speculation. Infrastructure tokens tend to matter because people rely on them, not because they trend. If real applications depend on Walrus for performance and reliability, the network naturally becomes more valuable over time. It’s less about hype and more about necessity.
The interesting part is that it still feels early. Most of the market hasn’t fully connected the dots yet. But developers usually notice these shifts before everyone else. They feel the pain first. And when they start moving toward a solution quietly and consistently, that’s usually a sign something important is happening.
Personally, I’ve started seeing Walrus less as “a storage project” and more as a data engine that future Web3 apps might run on without users even realizing it. The same way we don’t think about cloud providers today, we just expect everything to work.
If Web3 is going to support serious applications, not just experiments, it needs storage that can handle real pressure. From where I stand, Walrus feels like one of the few networks actually built for that world. Not flashy. Not loud. Just solving a problem everyone else tried to ignore. And sometimes that’s exactly how the most important infrastructure gets built.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #walrus $WAL

Quando guardo la maggior parte delle blockchain, noto un modello familiare. Il primo giorno promettono piena decentralizzazione, accesso senza permesso e totale apertura. Sembra fantastico in teoria. Ma quando quelle stesse reti devono gestire pagamenti reali, utenti reali e aziende reali che si aspettano uptime e conformità, le cose si complicano rapidamente. Improvvisamente, l'idealismo si scontra con la realtà.
Ecco perché l'approccio di Vanar mi sembra diverso.
Invece di fingere che tutto sia decentralizzato fin dall'inizio, Vanar sembra accettare qualcosa in cui sono giunto a credere anch'io: la fiducia non è istantanea. Si costruisce passo dopo passo. Come utente, in realtà non voglio caos dal primo giorno. Voglio qualcosa che funzioni, qualcosa di stabile, qualcosa su cui posso contare prima di iniziare a preoccuparmi della purezza filosofica.

Quando guardo la maggior parte delle blockchain oggi, noto quanto della conversazione ruoti ancora attorno alla speculazione. La gente parla di NFT, memecoins, trading e yield farms come se fosse tutta la storia. Ma quando penso a ciò che conta davvero per le persone comuni, me compreso, è molto più semplice. Voglio che il denaro si muova rapidamente. Voglio che sia economico. Non voglio pensare ai token di gas, alla congestione o se la mia transazione fallirà.
Ecco perché Plasma mi sembra diverso.
Non lo vedo solo come un altro Layer-1 alla ricerca di numeri TPS più elevati. Lo vedo come un tentativo di costruire qualcosa che userei realmente nella vita quotidiana: una infrastruttura finanziaria progettata specificamente per le stablecoin. Non un parco giochi di uso generale, ma un'infrastruttura per il denaro stesso.

Quando sento per la prima volta le persone parlare di portare beni del mondo reale sulla blockchain, spesso sembra semplice. Tokenizza un'obbligazione, tokenizza un'equità, mettila su una blockchain, fatto. Ma più ho approfondito come funzionano realmente i mercati dei capitali, più mi rendo conto di quanto sia irrealistico quel quadro.
I mercati reali non sono solo scambi e grafici. Sono documenti, regole, divulgazioni, elenchi di investitori, restrizioni sui trasferimenti, audit, reportistica e controlli di conformità. Se quei pezzi non ci sono, non è realmente un titolo. È solo un token che finge di esserlo.

Quando ho sentito parlare per la prima volta di un nuovo progetto di archiviazione decentralizzata, il mio istinto è di solito scetticismo. Ho visto così tanti di loro promettere “IPFS ma migliore,” e alla fine della giornata sembra ancora un disco rigido nel cielo. I file entrano, i file escono, e questo è tutto.
Quindi, quando ho iniziato a guardare Walrus, ho cercato di capirlo da un angolo semplice e personale. Se sto costruendo un'app o archiviando qualcosa di importante, di cosa ho realmente bisogno?
Non ho solo bisogno di un posto dove scaricare file. Ho bisogno di sapere che i miei dati sono lì quando ne ho bisogno. Devo controllare chi può accedervi. Ho bisogno di prove che non sia stato manomesso. E idealmente, voglio che i miei dati interagiscano con i miei contratti intelligenti come qualsiasi altro asset on-chain.