E2SUI100

Subject: Formal Complaint — Buy Button Redirecting Users to Convert Instead of Spot**
I am submitting a formal complaint regarding the change to the Binance app’s Buy button.
Previously, pressing Buy gave direct access to the Spot trading interface, where I could see the order book, compare available prices, and choose how to execute an order. It now redirects directly to Convert, making the Spot order-book option less visible and less accessible.
This is a material downgrade in transparency and user choice. Convert may be convenient for some users, but it should not be imposed as the default route for users who expect direct access to Spot trading, visible market pricing, and order-book information. Redirecting the main Buy action away from the order book creates the impression that users are being steered toward a less transparent execution route.
I am particularly concerned that less-experienced users may not understand the difference between Convert and Spot. They may assume that Convert is the only available way to buy crypto, without being clearly shown the order book, market depth, execution alternatives, or the full pricing differences. This can be confusing and may disadvantage users who have less knowledge of how trading works.
Experienced users commonly prefer Spot because it provides clearer market visibility and more control over order execution. Binance should not make the more transparent trading route harder to access while placing Convert at the front of the user journey.
I request that Binance:
- Restore the previous Buy → Spot behavior; or
- Add a clear setting that allows users to choose Spot as their default Buy destination;
- Make Convert and Spot equally visible and easy to access; and
- Clearly disclose the differences between Convert and Spot, including pricing methodology, spreads, fees, execution method, and available order controls before routing users to Convert.
Please register this as a formal product and service complaint. I request a case reference number, a written explanation for this change, and confirmation of whether its impact on pricing transparency and informed user choice was assessed before implementation.

Kenapa saya terus kembali ke $HOME
Saya terus melihat $HOME lagi, dan jujur, saya pikir orang-orang sedang melihat hal yang salah.
Banyak diskusi kripto dimulai dan berakhir dengan grafik. Candle hijau = bagus. Candle merah = mati. Lalu seseorang melempar target harga dan semua orang mulai debat.
Saya lebih tertarik pada apa sebenarnya token itu terhubung.
Karena itulah Defi App menarik perhatian saya.
Gagasan dasarnya cukup sederhana: kumpulkan banyak hal DeFi dalam satu tempat, alih-alih membuat pengguna berpindah-pindah antar dompet, chain, bridge, dan token gas yang berbeda setiap lima menit.

Akan kubilang sekali lagi: Aku tetap berpikir HOME akan mencapai $0.05
$Mungkin aku salah. Itu kripto.
Tapi setelah melihat $HOME lagi, aku justru makin yakin, bukan makin tidak yakin.
Aku terus melihat orang-orang melihat harga saat ini dan memperlakukan HOME seolah-olah itu hanya token murah lain yang ada di Binance. Justru di situlah menurutku orang-orang kehilangan intinya.
Bagi saya, bagian yang menarik bukanlah bahwa HOME diperdagangkan dengan nilai sepersekian dolar.
Itu terjadi jika Defi App benar-benar membuat orang menggunakan produknya.

Something about the $BABY campaign doesn’t feel right to me
I’m going to say this because I’m genuinely frustrated.
I’ve been putting quite a lot of time into the $BABY campaign. Not just throwing two lines together , adding the tags and pressing publish. I actually spend time thinking about what to write, trying to make it original, making images, reading about @BabylonLabs_io and trying to follow all the rules properly.
Yesterday I spent a long time on one post.
My reward?
0.61 points.
Honestly… what am I supposed to do with that?
I’m not complaining because I didn’t get a huge reward. I’m complaining because I don’t understand the scoring.
And that’s the part that bothers me.
I’ve been looking at the leaderboard and I’ve noticed some accounts that appear to be P2P users rather than people actively creating the kind of $BABY content this campaign is asking for. Some of them are ranking surprisingly high.
So maybe I’m missing something.
Maybe there’s another part of the scoring system I don’t understand.
Maybe P2P activity counts for something I’m not aware of.
Fine.
But then explain it.
Because from the outside, it looks strange when someone can spend time creating original content about $BABY , following the campaign requirements, and receive a tiny score, while accounts that don’t appear to be doing the same type of activity can sit very high on the leaderboard.
That’s what makes creators annoyed.
Not losing.
Not knowing why you’re losing.
I don’t expect every post I make to get a massive score. Obviously not. There are thousands of creators competing and the system has to decide what deserves more points.
But if originality matters, relevance matters, visuals matter and actual effort matters, then I’d like to understand how those things are being weighted.
Because sometimes I look at a post that took me five minutes and think, “yeah, maybe that wasn’t great.”
Fair enough.
But when I spend a long time researching something, writing it properly and creating an original visual, then get 0.61, I naturally start wondering what the system actually wants from me.
And this isn’t me attacking Babylon.
Quite the opposite.
I actually like what @BabylonLabs_io is building. That’s why I’m still here making content about baby instead of simply moving on to another campaign.
W
I just don’t like feeling that the campaign itself is becoming a competition where the rules aren’t completely obvious.
If I’m doing something wrong, tell me what I’m doing wrong.
If my content isn’t original enough, show me what better content looks like.
If the scoring is heavily influenced by something other than posts, explain that.
If P2P activity contributes to the ranking, tell creators that clearly.
If there are other factors we’re not seeing, then give us some transparency around them.
That’s all I’m asking.
Because I don’t mind putting in the work. I’ve already proved that to myself by the amount of time I’ve spent on these posts.
What I don’t want is to spend an hour making something and then look at the leaderboard wondering whether any of it actually mattered.
And yes, maybe I’m completely wrong about some of the accounts I’ve seen.
That’s possible.
I’m not claiming I’ve uncovered some secret system or that I know the leaderboard is rigged.
I’m saying it looks confusing from a creator’s point of view, and when enough people start feeling confused about the same thing, it’s probably worth addressing.
I’d much rather have a campaign where I know:
“Do this → this is worth X.”
“Make something genuinely original → this matters.”
“Bring useful information about baby and u’ll be rewarded.”
Then I can decide whether it’s worth my time and improve my content accordingly.
That’s fair competition.
At the moment, I’m honestly just disappointed.
I like $BABY .
I like the idea behind Babylon.
I enjoy making crypto content.
But I don’t want to feel like I’m shouting into a room where someone else knows the scoring system better than I do.
So @BabylonLabs_io _io, if someone from the team sees this:
What exactly determines these scores?
Because I’m genuinely interested in understanding it.
And if I’m doing something wrong, I’ll happily change what I’m doing.
Just tell me what the game actually is.

Saya tidak berpikir DeFi punya masalah dengan terlalu sedikit aplikasi. DeFi punya masalah dengan terlalu banyak gesekan.
Setiap kali ada orang baru yang bertanya harus mulai dari mana, hal yang sama selalu muncul. Dompet yang mana? Jaringan yang mana? Kenapa saya tiba-tiba perlu token lain hanya untuk membayar gas? Bagi orang yang sudah berada di kripto, itu terasa normal. Bagi semua orang lainnya, itu membingungkan.
Itulah sebabnya saya sempat berhenti dan melihat Defi App, alih-alih hanya melihat $HOME chart.
Yang menarik bagi saya bukan tokennya pertama kali. Yang menarik adalah idenya agar berbagai blockchain terasa seperti satu tempat. Jika sebuah aplikasi bisa memungkinkan saya menukar aset, berpindah antarjaringan, dan tidak terus-menerus memikirkan biaya gas, itu menyelesaikan masalah nyata, bukan menambahkan fitur lain yang tidak ada yang minta.

Saya sudah mengikuti evolusi Bitcoin selama bertahun-tahun, dan salah satu frustrasi terbesar selalu tentang betapa sulitnya benar-benar menggunakan BTC Anda di DeFi tanpa kehilangan kendali, membungkusnya, atau mempercayai perantara tertentu. Anda bisa menahannya atau mengorbankan kedaulatan diri. Babylon mengubah permainan itu.
Vault Bitcoin Tanpa Kepercayaan mereka (TBV) memungkinkan Anda mengunci BTC asli langsung di jaringan Bitcoin sambil menggunakannya sebagai jaminan di Ethereum—saat ini melalui Aave v4 di testnet. Tidak ada jembatan, tidak ada token terbungkus, tidak ada kustodian. Kunci Anda, koin Anda, tetapi sekarang produktif di DeFi untuk meminjam stablecoin seperti USDC/USDT. Ini efisien secara modal, bisa dikustodikan sendiri, dan sepenuhnya tanpa kepercayaan.

Kenapa Saya Masih Menonton $BABY Sementara Semua Orang Mengejar Tren Berikutnya
Satu hal yang diajarkan kripto kepada saya adalah bahwa pasar punya ingatan yang sangat singkat.
Setiap beberapa minggu muncul koin baru yang semua orang mengklaim akan mengubah semuanya. Timeline dipenuhi emoji roket, target harga yang mustahil, dan orang-orang yang pura-pura seolah mereka sudah tahu dari awal. Lalu, secepat itu juga, percakapan pindah ke tempat lain.
Dulu saya sering terjebak dalam hal itu.
Melihat ke belakang, beberapa keputusan terburuk saya datang dari perasaan bahwa saya harus bertindak sebelum memiliki informasi yang cukup. Saya bukan berinvestasi—saya hanya bereaksi.