Coinstelegram
3.8k Posting
Coinstelegram
Square Terverifikasi+Laporkan
Blokir Pengguna
Coinstelegram is a leading blockchain & altcoins cryptocurrency media
0 Mengikuti
19.6K+ Pengikut
3.2K+ Disukai
Posting
Lihat terjemahan
Robinhood’s Blockchain Hit $400 Million TVL in 16 Days — But Memecoins, Not RWA, Drove the SurgeRobinhood, the retail brokerage that democratized commission-free stock trading, launched its own blockchain on July 1, 2026, positioning it as infrastructure for tokenized real-world assets and around-the-clock equity trading.
Within sixteen days, the network had accumulated $312-400 million in total value locked (TVL), ranking it among crypto’s fastest-growing blockchains. Yet the narrative took an unexpected turn: memcoins, not the tokenized stocks the platform was designed to showcase, became the primary engine of this explosive growth.
The Launch: An Infrastructure Play for Financial Markets
Robinhood Chain is an Ethereum Layer 2 network built using Arbitrum Orbit technology. The infrastructure runs at 100-millisecond block times and uses ETH for transaction fees, with Robinhood subsidizing gas costs for users transacting through its branded wallet for the first 90 days. The network launched with immediate integrations to Uniswap for spot trading, Chainlink for price oracle data, and Morpho for lending — a sophisticated stack designed to support institutional-grade DeFi and tokenized asset trading.
The company’s vision was explicit: create a blockchain where equities, bonds, commodities, and other real-world assets could be tokenized and traded twenty-four hours a day without the market-hours restrictions of traditional finance. For a company serving millions of retail investors accustomed to Robinhood’s interface simplicity, the blockchain represented the next frontier in making markets permissionless and programmable.
The Memecoin Takeover
The market had other ideas. Within days, a cat-themed memecoin named CASHCAT became the dominant liquidity source on the network. CASHCAT’s name references “Cash Cat,” an identity considered by Robinhood’s founders before the company settled on the Robinhood brand — a nostalgic connection that provided thematic ammunition for community-driven promotion.
In its first week, CASHCAT surged 2,158% in value, reaching a market capitalization between $156 million and $200 million at its peak before declining sharply. Early investors who purchased stakes measured in hundreds of dollars converted those positions into seven-figure returns. One documented trader converted an $800 position into more than $1 million in profit, a narrative that rippled across crypto trading forums and accelerated retail participation.
Other memecoins followed similar trajectories. Cash Dog and Hoodrat leveraged the memecoin momentum, each attempting to capture speculative trading volume. By mid-July, weekly DEX volume on Robinhood Chain reached $5.25 billion, volumes that would be exceptional for any new network and drew comparisons to Ethereum’s early-stage activity metrics.
The Contrast: Real-World Assets Versus Speculation
The stark disparity reveals the tension underlying the network’s early success. Tokenized real-world assets — the financial products Robinhood Chain was explicitly built to support — account for only $12.8-13 million in total value. Of this, approximately $10.68 million represents tokenized equities, while the remainder is distributed among commodity tokens, tokenized ETFs, and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Meanwhile, CASHCAT alone captured 12 times more value than all tokenized stocks combined. Stablecoins — USDC, USDT, and others — dominated TVL accounting, representing approximately $260-294 million of the network’s balance sheet. This composition suggests that the network’s early users were speculative traders seeking exposure to emerging blockchain ecosystems rather than financial professionals evaluating tokenized equity infrastructure.
CEO Acknowledges the Memecoin Reality
Vlad Tenev, Robinhood’s CEO, posted on X acknowledging the memecoin phenomenon: “While we’re building robinhood chain to be the best chain for RWA … it works great for memes too.” The statement, following CASHCAT’s ascent, signaled tacit acceptance that speculative interest had become the network’s primary growth catalyst. Tenev even followed CASHCAT’s official account, further legitimizing community perception of memecoin activity as part of the broader Robinhood Chain ecosystem.
The Infrastructure Implications
Robinhood Chain achieved 3.6 million daily transactions at peak activity, executed 17 million total transactions in its opening week, and onboarded nearly 350,000 addresses. Pump.fun, the Solana-based memecoin launchpad that has generated billions in speculative volume, announced support for Robinhood Chain tokens, further deepening the network’s integration into memecoin trading infrastructure.
This early adoption pattern is not unprecedented. New blockchains have historically attracted speculative capital first; institutional products follow as infrastructure matures. The question facing Robinhood is whether the memecoin speculators who drove initial TVL and transaction volume will eventually transition into users of tokenized equity and real-world asset offerings.
The Path Forward
Robinhood’s blockchain has achieved exceptional early metrics. Seven-day DEX volume reached $5.25 billion, daily active addresses approached 200,000 at peak, and over 13,900 smart contracts were deployed in the opening week. Yet these statistics mask an uncomfortable reality: most activity reflects speculation rather than adoption of the infrastructure Robinhood was explicitly designed to provide.
The company faces a critical inflection point: convert speculative traders into genuine users of tokenized financial products, or accept that memecoin trading activity, while impressive, does not validate its core RWA ambitions.
Robinhood’s Blockchain Hit $400 Million TVL in 16 Days — But Memecoins, Not RWA, Drove the Surge
Robinhood, the retail brokerage that democratized commission-free stock trading, launched its own blockchain on July 1, 2026, positioning it as infrastructure for tokenized real-world assets and around-the-clock equity trading.
Within sixteen days, the network had accumulated $312-400 million in total value locked (TVL), ranking it among crypto’s fastest-growing blockchains. Yet the narrative took an unexpected turn: memcoins, not the tokenized stocks the platform was designed to showcase, became the primary engine of this explosive growth.
The Launch: An Infrastructure Play for Financial Markets
Robinhood Chain is an Ethereum Layer 2 network built using Arbitrum Orbit technology. The infrastructure runs at 100-millisecond block times and uses ETH for transaction fees, with Robinhood subsidizing gas costs for users transacting through its branded wallet for the first 90 days. The network launched with immediate integrations to Uniswap for spot trading, Chainlink for price oracle data, and Morpho for lending — a sophisticated stack designed to support institutional-grade DeFi and tokenized asset trading.
The company’s vision was explicit: create a blockchain where equities, bonds, commodities, and other real-world assets could be tokenized and traded twenty-four hours a day without the market-hours restrictions of traditional finance. For a company serving millions of retail investors accustomed to Robinhood’s interface simplicity, the blockchain represented the next frontier in making markets permissionless and programmable.
The Memecoin Takeover
The market had other ideas. Within days, a cat-themed memecoin named CASHCAT became the dominant liquidity source on the network. CASHCAT’s name references “Cash Cat,” an identity considered by Robinhood’s founders before the company settled on the Robinhood brand — a nostalgic connection that provided thematic ammunition for community-driven promotion.
In its first week, CASHCAT surged 2,158% in value, reaching a market capitalization between $156 million and $200 million at its peak before declining sharply. Early investors who purchased stakes measured in hundreds of dollars converted those positions into seven-figure returns. One documented trader converted an $800 position into more than $1 million in profit, a narrative that rippled across crypto trading forums and accelerated retail participation.
Other memecoins followed similar trajectories. Cash Dog and Hoodrat leveraged the memecoin momentum, each attempting to capture speculative trading volume. By mid-July, weekly DEX volume on Robinhood Chain reached $5.25 billion, volumes that would be exceptional for any new network and drew comparisons to Ethereum’s early-stage activity metrics.
The Contrast: Real-World Assets Versus Speculation
The stark disparity reveals the tension underlying the network’s early success. Tokenized real-world assets — the financial products Robinhood Chain was explicitly built to support — account for only $12.8-13 million in total value. Of this, approximately $10.68 million represents tokenized equities, while the remainder is distributed among commodity tokens, tokenized ETFs, and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Meanwhile, CASHCAT alone captured 12 times more value than all tokenized stocks combined. Stablecoins — USDC, USDT, and others — dominated TVL accounting, representing approximately $260-294 million of the network’s balance sheet. This composition suggests that the network’s early users were speculative traders seeking exposure to emerging blockchain ecosystems rather than financial professionals evaluating tokenized equity infrastructure.
CEO Acknowledges the Memecoin Reality
Vlad Tenev, Robinhood’s CEO, posted on X acknowledging the memecoin phenomenon: “While we’re building robinhood chain to be the best chain for RWA … it works great for memes too.” The statement, following CASHCAT’s ascent, signaled tacit acceptance that speculative interest had become the network’s primary growth catalyst. Tenev even followed CASHCAT’s official account, further legitimizing community perception of memecoin activity as part of the broader Robinhood Chain ecosystem.
The Infrastructure Implications
Robinhood Chain achieved 3.6 million daily transactions at peak activity, executed 17 million total transactions in its opening week, and onboarded nearly 350,000 addresses. Pump.fun, the Solana-based memecoin launchpad that has generated billions in speculative volume, announced support for Robinhood Chain tokens, further deepening the network’s integration into memecoin trading infrastructure.
This early adoption pattern is not unprecedented. New blockchains have historically attracted speculative capital first; institutional products follow as infrastructure matures. The question facing Robinhood is whether the memecoin speculators who drove initial TVL and transaction volume will eventually transition into users of tokenized equity and real-world asset offerings.
The Path Forward
Robinhood’s blockchain has achieved exceptional early metrics. Seven-day DEX volume reached $5.25 billion, daily active addresses approached 200,000 at peak, and over 13,900 smart contracts were deployed in the opening week. Yet these statistics mask an uncomfortable reality: most activity reflects speculation rather than adoption of the infrastructure Robinhood was explicitly designed to provide.
The company faces a critical inflection point: convert speculative traders into genuine users of tokenized financial products, or accept that memecoin trading activity, while impressive, does not validate its core RWA ambitions.
Within sixteen days, the network had accumulated $312-400 million in total value locked (TVL), ranking it among crypto’s fastest-growing blockchains. Yet the narrative took an unexpected turn: memcoins, not the tokenized stocks the platform was designed to showcase, became the primary engine of this explosive growth.
The Launch: An Infrastructure Play for Financial Markets
Robinhood Chain is an Ethereum Layer 2 network built using Arbitrum Orbit technology. The infrastructure runs at 100-millisecond block times and uses ETH for transaction fees, with Robinhood subsidizing gas costs for users transacting through its branded wallet for the first 90 days. The network launched with immediate integrations to Uniswap for spot trading, Chainlink for price oracle data, and Morpho for lending — a sophisticated stack designed to support institutional-grade DeFi and tokenized asset trading.
The company’s vision was explicit: create a blockchain where equities, bonds, commodities, and other real-world assets could be tokenized and traded twenty-four hours a day without the market-hours restrictions of traditional finance. For a company serving millions of retail investors accustomed to Robinhood’s interface simplicity, the blockchain represented the next frontier in making markets permissionless and programmable.
The Memecoin Takeover
The market had other ideas. Within days, a cat-themed memecoin named CASHCAT became the dominant liquidity source on the network. CASHCAT’s name references “Cash Cat,” an identity considered by Robinhood’s founders before the company settled on the Robinhood brand — a nostalgic connection that provided thematic ammunition for community-driven promotion.
In its first week, CASHCAT surged 2,158% in value, reaching a market capitalization between $156 million and $200 million at its peak before declining sharply. Early investors who purchased stakes measured in hundreds of dollars converted those positions into seven-figure returns. One documented trader converted an $800 position into more than $1 million in profit, a narrative that rippled across crypto trading forums and accelerated retail participation.
Other memecoins followed similar trajectories. Cash Dog and Hoodrat leveraged the memecoin momentum, each attempting to capture speculative trading volume. By mid-July, weekly DEX volume on Robinhood Chain reached $5.25 billion, volumes that would be exceptional for any new network and drew comparisons to Ethereum’s early-stage activity metrics.
The Contrast: Real-World Assets Versus Speculation
The stark disparity reveals the tension underlying the network’s early success. Tokenized real-world assets — the financial products Robinhood Chain was explicitly built to support — account for only $12.8-13 million in total value. Of this, approximately $10.68 million represents tokenized equities, while the remainder is distributed among commodity tokens, tokenized ETFs, and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Meanwhile, CASHCAT alone captured 12 times more value than all tokenized stocks combined. Stablecoins — USDC, USDT, and others — dominated TVL accounting, representing approximately $260-294 million of the network’s balance sheet. This composition suggests that the network’s early users were speculative traders seeking exposure to emerging blockchain ecosystems rather than financial professionals evaluating tokenized equity infrastructure.
CEO Acknowledges the Memecoin Reality
Vlad Tenev, Robinhood’s CEO, posted on X acknowledging the memecoin phenomenon: “While we’re building robinhood chain to be the best chain for RWA … it works great for memes too.” The statement, following CASHCAT’s ascent, signaled tacit acceptance that speculative interest had become the network’s primary growth catalyst. Tenev even followed CASHCAT’s official account, further legitimizing community perception of memecoin activity as part of the broader Robinhood Chain ecosystem.
The Infrastructure Implications
Robinhood Chain achieved 3.6 million daily transactions at peak activity, executed 17 million total transactions in its opening week, and onboarded nearly 350,000 addresses. Pump.fun, the Solana-based memecoin launchpad that has generated billions in speculative volume, announced support for Robinhood Chain tokens, further deepening the network’s integration into memecoin trading infrastructure.
This early adoption pattern is not unprecedented. New blockchains have historically attracted speculative capital first; institutional products follow as infrastructure matures. The question facing Robinhood is whether the memecoin speculators who drove initial TVL and transaction volume will eventually transition into users of tokenized equity and real-world asset offerings.
The Path Forward
Robinhood’s blockchain has achieved exceptional early metrics. Seven-day DEX volume reached $5.25 billion, daily active addresses approached 200,000 at peak, and over 13,900 smart contracts were deployed in the opening week. Yet these statistics mask an uncomfortable reality: most activity reflects speculation rather than adoption of the infrastructure Robinhood was explicitly designed to provide.
The company faces a critical inflection point: convert speculative traders into genuine users of tokenized financial products, or accept that memecoin trading activity, while impressive, does not validate its core RWA ambitions.
78
Artikel
Blockchain Robinhood Tembus $400 Juta TVL dalam 16 Hari — tapi Memecoin, Bukan RWA, yang Menggerakkan LonjakanRobinhood, pialang ritel yang mendemokratisasi perdagangan saham tanpa komisi, meluncurkan blockchain-nya sendiri pada 1 Juli 2026, memposisikannya sebagai infrastruktur untuk aset riil yang ditokenisasi dan perdagangan saham sepanjang waktu.
Dalam enam belas hari, jaringan tersebut telah mengumpulkan nilai total terkunci (TVL) sebesar $312-400 juta, menempatkannya di antara blockchain dengan pertumbuhan tercepat di kripto. Namun, narasinya mengambil arah yang tak terduga: memecoin, bukan saham tokenisasi yang seharusnya ditampilkan oleh platform tersebut, menjadi mesin utama di balik pertumbuhan yang meledak itu.
Blockchain Robinhood Tembus $400 Juta TVL dalam 16 Hari — tapi Memecoin, Bukan RWA, yang Menggerakkan Lonjakan
Robinhood, pialang ritel yang mendemokratisasi perdagangan saham tanpa komisi, meluncurkan blockchain-nya sendiri pada 1 Juli 2026, memposisikannya sebagai infrastruktur untuk aset riil yang ditokenisasi dan perdagangan saham sepanjang waktu.
Dalam enam belas hari, jaringan tersebut telah mengumpulkan nilai total terkunci (TVL) sebesar $312-400 juta, menempatkannya di antara blockchain dengan pertumbuhan tercepat di kripto. Namun, narasinya mengambil arah yang tak terduga: memecoin, bukan saham tokenisasi yang seharusnya ditampilkan oleh platform tersebut, menjadi mesin utama di balik pertumbuhan yang meledak itu.
Dalam enam belas hari, jaringan tersebut telah mengumpulkan nilai total terkunci (TVL) sebesar $312-400 juta, menempatkannya di antara blockchain dengan pertumbuhan tercepat di kripto. Namun, narasinya mengambil arah yang tak terduga: memecoin, bukan saham tokenisasi yang seharusnya ditampilkan oleh platform tersebut, menjadi mesin utama di balik pertumbuhan yang meledak itu.
147
Platform Perpetual Arbitrum Ostium Mengalami Eksploit Oracle Senilai $18 Juta — Salah Satu yang Terbesar pada 2026 Se...Ostium, bursa derivatif terdesentralisasi yang dibangun di jaringan Arbitrum Layer 2, menjadi sasaran serangan manipulasi oracle yang canggih pada 15 Juli 2026.
Serangan tersebut menguras sekitar $18 juta dalam USDC stablecoin dari brankas likuiditas platform—menjadikannya salah satu serangan paling signifikan terhadap infrastruktur keuangan terdesentralisasi tahun ini dan mengungkap kerentanan kritis dalam cara protokol blockchain mengamankan data harga.
Serangan: Bagaimana Hal Itu Terjadi
Perusahaan keamanan Blockaid mendeteksi pelanggaran tersebut dalam waktu beberapa jam setelah eksekusinya, mengungkap eksploitasi yang terencana dari sistem otomatisasi price-feed Ostium. Penyerang memperoleh akses ke komponen penting bernama PriceUpKeep, sebuah smart contract yang bertugas mengirimkan harga aset dunia nyata ke blockchain pada saat-saat yang tepat ketika transaksi dieksekusi.
Platform Perpetual Arbitrum Ostium Mengalami Eksploit Oracle Senilai $18 Juta — Salah Satu yang Terbesar pada 2026 Se...
Ostium, bursa derivatif terdesentralisasi yang dibangun di jaringan Arbitrum Layer 2, menjadi sasaran serangan manipulasi oracle yang canggih pada 15 Juli 2026.
Serangan tersebut menguras sekitar $18 juta dalam USDC stablecoin dari brankas likuiditas platform—menjadikannya salah satu serangan paling signifikan terhadap infrastruktur keuangan terdesentralisasi tahun ini dan mengungkap kerentanan kritis dalam cara protokol blockchain mengamankan data harga.
Serangan: Bagaimana Hal Itu Terjadi
Perusahaan keamanan Blockaid mendeteksi pelanggaran tersebut dalam waktu beberapa jam setelah eksekusinya, mengungkap eksploitasi yang terencana dari sistem otomatisasi price-feed Ostium. Penyerang memperoleh akses ke komponen penting bernama PriceUpKeep, sebuah smart contract yang bertugas mengirimkan harga aset dunia nyata ke blockchain pada saat-saat yang tepat ketika transaksi dieksekusi.
Serangan tersebut menguras sekitar $18 juta dalam USDC stablecoin dari brankas likuiditas platform—menjadikannya salah satu serangan paling signifikan terhadap infrastruktur keuangan terdesentralisasi tahun ini dan mengungkap kerentanan kritis dalam cara protokol blockchain mengamankan data harga.
Serangan: Bagaimana Hal Itu Terjadi
Perusahaan keamanan Blockaid mendeteksi pelanggaran tersebut dalam waktu beberapa jam setelah eksekusinya, mengungkap eksploitasi yang terencana dari sistem otomatisasi price-feed Ostium. Penyerang memperoleh akses ke komponen penting bernama PriceUpKeep, sebuah smart contract yang bertugas mengirimkan harga aset dunia nyata ke blockchain pada saat-saat yang tepat ketika transaksi dieksekusi.
120
Artikel
Platform Arbitrum Perpetual Ostium Mengalami Eksploit Oracle Senilai $18 Juta — Salah Satu yang Terbesar di ...Ostium, bursa derivatif terdesentralisasi yang dibangun di jaringan Arbitrum Layer 2, menjadi target serangan manipulasi oracle yang canggih pada 15 Juli 2026.
Serangan tersebut menguras sekitar $18 juta dalam stablecoin USDC dari brankas likuiditas platform — menandai salah satu serangan terbesar terhadap infrastruktur keuangan terdesentralisasi tahun ini dan menyingkap kerentanan kritis dalam cara protokol blockchain mengamankan data harga.
Serangan: Bagaimana Hal Itu Terjadi
Perusahaan keamanan Blockaid mendeteksi pelanggaran tersebut dalam hitungan jam setelah serangan itu dijalankan, mengungkap eksploitasi yang terencana terhadap sistem otomatisasi price-feed milik Ostium. Penyerang memperoleh akses ke komponen penting bernama PriceUpKeep, sebuah smart contract yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengirimkan harga aset dunia nyata ke blockchain pada momen yang tepat saat transaksi dieksekusi.
Platform Arbitrum Perpetual Ostium Mengalami Eksploit Oracle Senilai $18 Juta — Salah Satu yang Terbesar di ...
Ostium, bursa derivatif terdesentralisasi yang dibangun di jaringan Arbitrum Layer 2, menjadi target serangan manipulasi oracle yang canggih pada 15 Juli 2026.
Serangan tersebut menguras sekitar $18 juta dalam stablecoin USDC dari brankas likuiditas platform — menandai salah satu serangan terbesar terhadap infrastruktur keuangan terdesentralisasi tahun ini dan menyingkap kerentanan kritis dalam cara protokol blockchain mengamankan data harga.
Serangan: Bagaimana Hal Itu Terjadi
Perusahaan keamanan Blockaid mendeteksi pelanggaran tersebut dalam hitungan jam setelah serangan itu dijalankan, mengungkap eksploitasi yang terencana terhadap sistem otomatisasi price-feed milik Ostium. Penyerang memperoleh akses ke komponen penting bernama PriceUpKeep, sebuah smart contract yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengirimkan harga aset dunia nyata ke blockchain pada momen yang tepat saat transaksi dieksekusi.
Serangan tersebut menguras sekitar $18 juta dalam stablecoin USDC dari brankas likuiditas platform — menandai salah satu serangan terbesar terhadap infrastruktur keuangan terdesentralisasi tahun ini dan menyingkap kerentanan kritis dalam cara protokol blockchain mengamankan data harga.
Serangan: Bagaimana Hal Itu Terjadi
Perusahaan keamanan Blockaid mendeteksi pelanggaran tersebut dalam hitungan jam setelah serangan itu dijalankan, mengungkap eksploitasi yang terencana terhadap sistem otomatisasi price-feed milik Ostium. Penyerang memperoleh akses ke komponen penting bernama PriceUpKeep, sebuah smart contract yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengirimkan harga aset dunia nyata ke blockchain pada momen yang tepat saat transaksi dieksekusi.
199
Artikel
Interactive Brokers Meluncurkan Ekspansi Kripto Besar: 9 Token Baru dan Kapabilitas Penarikan Stablecoin...Interactive Brokers, salah satu platform pialang ritel terbesar di Amerika, telah mengambil langkah signifikan menuju pengintegrasian kripto ke dalam infrastruktur keuangan arus utama. Perusahaan tersebut mengumumkan penambahan dua belas aset digital baru ke platform perdagangannya dan mengaktifkan kemampuan penarikan stablecoin secara langsung — langkah yang menunjukkan bahwa keuangan tradisional kini tidak lagi menunggu kejelasan regulasi sebelum membangun infrastruktur kripto miliknya sendiri.
Ekspansi ini mencakup sembilan token yang ditambahkan melalui Zero Hash (AAVE, APT, CC, LDO, MON, NEAR, XPL, PAXG, dan UNI) serta tiga token tambahan melalui Paxos (AAVE, UNI, dan PAXG), sehingga memberi klien Interactive Brokers akses langsung ke beberapa protokol dan platform DeFi yang paling mapan. Sama pentingnya adalah aktivasi fungsionalitas penarikan stablecoin, yang memungkinkan klien mengonversi dolar menjadi USDC, PYUSD, atau RLUSD serta mentransfer dana ke dompet eksternal secara instan, 24 jam sehari.
Interactive Brokers Meluncurkan Ekspansi Kripto Besar: 9 Token Baru dan Kapabilitas Penarikan Stablecoin...
Interactive Brokers, salah satu platform pialang ritel terbesar di Amerika, telah mengambil langkah signifikan menuju pengintegrasian kripto ke dalam infrastruktur keuangan arus utama. Perusahaan tersebut mengumumkan penambahan dua belas aset digital baru ke platform perdagangannya dan mengaktifkan kemampuan penarikan stablecoin secara langsung — langkah yang menunjukkan bahwa keuangan tradisional kini tidak lagi menunggu kejelasan regulasi sebelum membangun infrastruktur kripto miliknya sendiri.
Ekspansi ini mencakup sembilan token yang ditambahkan melalui Zero Hash (AAVE, APT, CC, LDO, MON, NEAR, XPL, PAXG, dan UNI) serta tiga token tambahan melalui Paxos (AAVE, UNI, dan PAXG), sehingga memberi klien Interactive Brokers akses langsung ke beberapa protokol dan platform DeFi yang paling mapan. Sama pentingnya adalah aktivasi fungsionalitas penarikan stablecoin, yang memungkinkan klien mengonversi dolar menjadi USDC, PYUSD, atau RLUSD serta mentransfer dana ke dompet eksternal secara instan, 24 jam sehari.
Ekspansi ini mencakup sembilan token yang ditambahkan melalui Zero Hash (AAVE, APT, CC, LDO, MON, NEAR, XPL, PAXG, dan UNI) serta tiga token tambahan melalui Paxos (AAVE, UNI, dan PAXG), sehingga memberi klien Interactive Brokers akses langsung ke beberapa protokol dan platform DeFi yang paling mapan. Sama pentingnya adalah aktivasi fungsionalitas penarikan stablecoin, yang memungkinkan klien mengonversi dolar menjadi USDC, PYUSD, atau RLUSD serta mentransfer dana ke dompet eksternal secara instan, 24 jam sehari.
110
Interactive Brokers Meluncurkan Ekspansi Kripto Besar: 9 Token Baru dan Penarikan Stablecoin Berkapasitas...Interactive Brokers, salah satu platform pialang ritel terbesar di Amerika, telah mengambil langkah signifikan menuju integrasi kripto ke dalam infrastruktur keuangan arus utama. Perusahaan mengumumkan penambahan dua belas aset digital baru ke platform perdagangannya dan mengaktifkan kemampuan penarikan stablecoin secara langsung — langkah yang menunjukkan bahwa keuangan tradisional kini tidak lagi menunggu kejelasan regulasi sebelum membangun jalur kripto miliknya sendiri.
Ekspansi ini mencakup sembilan token yang ditambahkan melalui Zero Hash (AAVE, APT, CC, LDO, MON, NEAR, XPL, PAXG, dan UNI) serta tiga token tambahan melalui Paxos (AAVE, UNI, dan PAXG), sehingga klien Interactive Brokers mendapatkan akses langsung ke beberapa protokol dan platform DeFi yang paling mapan. Sama pentingnya adalah aktivasi fungsionalitas penarikan stablecoin, yang memungkinkan klien mengonversi dolar menjadi USDC, PYUSD, atau RLUSD dan mentransfer dana ke dompet eksternal secara instan, 24 jam sehari.
Interactive Brokers Meluncurkan Ekspansi Kripto Besar: 9 Token Baru dan Penarikan Stablecoin Berkapasitas...
Interactive Brokers, salah satu platform pialang ritel terbesar di Amerika, telah mengambil langkah signifikan menuju integrasi kripto ke dalam infrastruktur keuangan arus utama. Perusahaan mengumumkan penambahan dua belas aset digital baru ke platform perdagangannya dan mengaktifkan kemampuan penarikan stablecoin secara langsung — langkah yang menunjukkan bahwa keuangan tradisional kini tidak lagi menunggu kejelasan regulasi sebelum membangun jalur kripto miliknya sendiri.
Ekspansi ini mencakup sembilan token yang ditambahkan melalui Zero Hash (AAVE, APT, CC, LDO, MON, NEAR, XPL, PAXG, dan UNI) serta tiga token tambahan melalui Paxos (AAVE, UNI, dan PAXG), sehingga klien Interactive Brokers mendapatkan akses langsung ke beberapa protokol dan platform DeFi yang paling mapan. Sama pentingnya adalah aktivasi fungsionalitas penarikan stablecoin, yang memungkinkan klien mengonversi dolar menjadi USDC, PYUSD, atau RLUSD dan mentransfer dana ke dompet eksternal secara instan, 24 jam sehari.
Ekspansi ini mencakup sembilan token yang ditambahkan melalui Zero Hash (AAVE, APT, CC, LDO, MON, NEAR, XPL, PAXG, dan UNI) serta tiga token tambahan melalui Paxos (AAVE, UNI, dan PAXG), sehingga klien Interactive Brokers mendapatkan akses langsung ke beberapa protokol dan platform DeFi yang paling mapan. Sama pentingnya adalah aktivasi fungsionalitas penarikan stablecoin, yang memungkinkan klien mengonversi dolar menjadi USDC, PYUSD, atau RLUSD dan mentransfer dana ke dompet eksternal secara instan, 24 jam sehari.
591
Lihat terjemahan
Major Banks’ Bitcoin Adoption Reaches 32% — Fidelity Leads as Wall Street Slowly Embraces Digital...The banking world’s engagement with Bitcoin and digital assets is accelerating but remains unevenly distributed across global financial institutions. A new Bitcoin Banking Adoption Index released by Strategy Inc. on July 13, 2026, reveals that major banks are integrating cryptocurrency services at a 32% average adoption rate — a metric that underscores both emerging institutional momentum and substantial untapped opportunity in the sector.
Strategy CEO Phong Le stated:
“Adoption of Bitcoin and the related digital asset ecosystem across major banks and financial institutions is accelerating, but still early at 32%.”
The index evaluated approximately 25 to 30 of the world’s largest banks across five key categories: Bitcoin and spot ETF trading, institutional custody, blockchain-related products including stablecoins and tokenization, lending and margin services, and executive-level commitment to digital assets.
The Leaders: Who’s Winning the Bitcoin Race
Fidelity Investments dominates the rankings with a 71% adoption score, significantly outpacing competitors. Fidelity’s lead reflects years of investment in institutional crypto custody, beginning with the establishment of Fidelity Digital Assets in 2018, paired with its Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (NYSE: FBTC). The Currency analytics
The gap between Fidelity and other major institutions is substantial. BNY Mellon ranks second globally with a 46% adoption score, focused primarily on institutional digital asset custody, while Goldman Sachs scores 45%. JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Citigroup cluster together at 43% each, benefiting from broader involvement in Bitcoin ETF products and client investment exposure. The Currency analytics
The second tier of American banks shows moderate engagement. Wells Fargo leads this group at 38%, followed by Charles Schwab and TD Bank at 32%. These institutions offer Bitcoin trading and exposure but typically maintain narrower product portfolios than top-tier leaders.
Geographic Disparities: US Dominance, Asian Lag
The index reveals stark geographic divisions in Bitcoin adoption. North American institutions dominate the upper rankings, while most European and Japanese lenders score below 30%. European banks including Banco Santander and Société Générale score 35%, while BNP Paribas, HSBC, Crédit Agricole, and UBS each score 30%.
Asian banking institutions show the slowest adoption. Japan’s SMBC and the Royal Bank of Canada score just 13%, constrained by more restrictive local regulatory frameworks. The single notable exception is DBS (Singapore), which operates a progressive digital exchange offering crypto trading and custody services.
What the Index Actually Measures
The Strategy index assesses bank adoption across dimensions that matter to institutional clients and retail users alike. Scoring categories include Bitcoin and spot ETF trading, custody for Bitcoin and ether, stablecoin and tokenization work, yield and lending products, underwriting for exchange-traded products, and whether corporate treasuries have allocated to Bitcoin.
However, a critical distinction exists between capability and availability. The rankings indicate whether capabilities are publicly visible, but they do not measure customer numbers, transaction volumes, assets, revenue or profitability. A service may be limited to institutional or wealth-management clients, or restricted to particular geographic markets. A high adoption score therefore reflects the breadth of Bitcoin services a bank offers, not necessarily how many customers use them or how accessible those services are to retail depositors.
What 32% Means for Institutional Bitcoin Adoption
The 32% overall score reflects a paradox: major banks are integrating Bitcoin services, yet most have not deeply committed to the asset class. The gap widens by geography, with U.S. institutions significantly ahead of European and Asian counterparts.
Strategy’s index comes from a company with substantial stakes in Bitcoin adoption outcomes. Strategy holds 843,775 Bitcoin alongside a $3 billion USD reserve as of July 12, 2026, making it the world’s largest corporate Bitcoin treasury holder. The company’s interest in demonstrating institutional momentum is therefore not neutral. However, the underlying data points align with market reality: major banks have deployed Bitcoin infrastructure, but adoption remains fragmented across services and customer segments.
The Institutional Opportunity Ahead
The 32% adoption figure signals both achievement and runway. Banks have moved beyond discussing Bitcoin to deploying custody infrastructure, launching ETF products, and enabling client exposure. Yet the global financial system remains in early stages of digital asset integration — two-thirds of major banks score below 32%, suggesting substantial opportunity for institutions that increase their Bitcoin capabilities.
Michael Saylor, Strategy co-founder, has repeatedly emphasized that “limited banking acceptance” represents one of the primary obstacles to Bitcoin’s growth as a treasury asset. The index therefore serves as a report card not just for banks, but for the Bitcoin ecosystem’s path toward mainstream financial integration.
Major Banks’ Bitcoin Adoption Reaches 32% — Fidelity Leads as Wall Street Slowly Embraces Digital...
The banking world’s engagement with Bitcoin and digital assets is accelerating but remains unevenly distributed across global financial institutions. A new Bitcoin Banking Adoption Index released by Strategy Inc. on July 13, 2026, reveals that major banks are integrating cryptocurrency services at a 32% average adoption rate — a metric that underscores both emerging institutional momentum and substantial untapped opportunity in the sector.
Strategy CEO Phong Le stated:
“Adoption of Bitcoin and the related digital asset ecosystem across major banks and financial institutions is accelerating, but still early at 32%.”
The index evaluated approximately 25 to 30 of the world’s largest banks across five key categories: Bitcoin and spot ETF trading, institutional custody, blockchain-related products including stablecoins and tokenization, lending and margin services, and executive-level commitment to digital assets.
The Leaders: Who’s Winning the Bitcoin Race
Fidelity Investments dominates the rankings with a 71% adoption score, significantly outpacing competitors. Fidelity’s lead reflects years of investment in institutional crypto custody, beginning with the establishment of Fidelity Digital Assets in 2018, paired with its Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (NYSE: FBTC). The Currency analytics
The gap between Fidelity and other major institutions is substantial. BNY Mellon ranks second globally with a 46% adoption score, focused primarily on institutional digital asset custody, while Goldman Sachs scores 45%. JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Citigroup cluster together at 43% each, benefiting from broader involvement in Bitcoin ETF products and client investment exposure. The Currency analytics
The second tier of American banks shows moderate engagement. Wells Fargo leads this group at 38%, followed by Charles Schwab and TD Bank at 32%. These institutions offer Bitcoin trading and exposure but typically maintain narrower product portfolios than top-tier leaders.
Geographic Disparities: US Dominance, Asian Lag
The index reveals stark geographic divisions in Bitcoin adoption. North American institutions dominate the upper rankings, while most European and Japanese lenders score below 30%. European banks including Banco Santander and Société Générale score 35%, while BNP Paribas, HSBC, Crédit Agricole, and UBS each score 30%.
Asian banking institutions show the slowest adoption. Japan’s SMBC and the Royal Bank of Canada score just 13%, constrained by more restrictive local regulatory frameworks. The single notable exception is DBS (Singapore), which operates a progressive digital exchange offering crypto trading and custody services.
What the Index Actually Measures
The Strategy index assesses bank adoption across dimensions that matter to institutional clients and retail users alike. Scoring categories include Bitcoin and spot ETF trading, custody for Bitcoin and ether, stablecoin and tokenization work, yield and lending products, underwriting for exchange-traded products, and whether corporate treasuries have allocated to Bitcoin.
However, a critical distinction exists between capability and availability. The rankings indicate whether capabilities are publicly visible, but they do not measure customer numbers, transaction volumes, assets, revenue or profitability. A service may be limited to institutional or wealth-management clients, or restricted to particular geographic markets. A high adoption score therefore reflects the breadth of Bitcoin services a bank offers, not necessarily how many customers use them or how accessible those services are to retail depositors.
What 32% Means for Institutional Bitcoin Adoption
The 32% overall score reflects a paradox: major banks are integrating Bitcoin services, yet most have not deeply committed to the asset class. The gap widens by geography, with U.S. institutions significantly ahead of European and Asian counterparts.
Strategy’s index comes from a company with substantial stakes in Bitcoin adoption outcomes. Strategy holds 843,775 Bitcoin alongside a $3 billion USD reserve as of July 12, 2026, making it the world’s largest corporate Bitcoin treasury holder. The company’s interest in demonstrating institutional momentum is therefore not neutral. However, the underlying data points align with market reality: major banks have deployed Bitcoin infrastructure, but adoption remains fragmented across services and customer segments.
The Institutional Opportunity Ahead
The 32% adoption figure signals both achievement and runway. Banks have moved beyond discussing Bitcoin to deploying custody infrastructure, launching ETF products, and enabling client exposure. Yet the global financial system remains in early stages of digital asset integration — two-thirds of major banks score below 32%, suggesting substantial opportunity for institutions that increase their Bitcoin capabilities.
Michael Saylor, Strategy co-founder, has repeatedly emphasized that “limited banking acceptance” represents one of the primary obstacles to Bitcoin’s growth as a treasury asset. The index therefore serves as a report card not just for banks, but for the Bitcoin ecosystem’s path toward mainstream financial integration.
Strategy CEO Phong Le stated:
“Adoption of Bitcoin and the related digital asset ecosystem across major banks and financial institutions is accelerating, but still early at 32%.”
The index evaluated approximately 25 to 30 of the world’s largest banks across five key categories: Bitcoin and spot ETF trading, institutional custody, blockchain-related products including stablecoins and tokenization, lending and margin services, and executive-level commitment to digital assets.
The Leaders: Who’s Winning the Bitcoin Race
Fidelity Investments dominates the rankings with a 71% adoption score, significantly outpacing competitors. Fidelity’s lead reflects years of investment in institutional crypto custody, beginning with the establishment of Fidelity Digital Assets in 2018, paired with its Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (NYSE: FBTC). The Currency analytics
The gap between Fidelity and other major institutions is substantial. BNY Mellon ranks second globally with a 46% adoption score, focused primarily on institutional digital asset custody, while Goldman Sachs scores 45%. JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Citigroup cluster together at 43% each, benefiting from broader involvement in Bitcoin ETF products and client investment exposure. The Currency analytics
The second tier of American banks shows moderate engagement. Wells Fargo leads this group at 38%, followed by Charles Schwab and TD Bank at 32%. These institutions offer Bitcoin trading and exposure but typically maintain narrower product portfolios than top-tier leaders.
Geographic Disparities: US Dominance, Asian Lag
The index reveals stark geographic divisions in Bitcoin adoption. North American institutions dominate the upper rankings, while most European and Japanese lenders score below 30%. European banks including Banco Santander and Société Générale score 35%, while BNP Paribas, HSBC, Crédit Agricole, and UBS each score 30%.
Asian banking institutions show the slowest adoption. Japan’s SMBC and the Royal Bank of Canada score just 13%, constrained by more restrictive local regulatory frameworks. The single notable exception is DBS (Singapore), which operates a progressive digital exchange offering crypto trading and custody services.
What the Index Actually Measures
The Strategy index assesses bank adoption across dimensions that matter to institutional clients and retail users alike. Scoring categories include Bitcoin and spot ETF trading, custody for Bitcoin and ether, stablecoin and tokenization work, yield and lending products, underwriting for exchange-traded products, and whether corporate treasuries have allocated to Bitcoin.
However, a critical distinction exists between capability and availability. The rankings indicate whether capabilities are publicly visible, but they do not measure customer numbers, transaction volumes, assets, revenue or profitability. A service may be limited to institutional or wealth-management clients, or restricted to particular geographic markets. A high adoption score therefore reflects the breadth of Bitcoin services a bank offers, not necessarily how many customers use them or how accessible those services are to retail depositors.
What 32% Means for Institutional Bitcoin Adoption
The 32% overall score reflects a paradox: major banks are integrating Bitcoin services, yet most have not deeply committed to the asset class. The gap widens by geography, with U.S. institutions significantly ahead of European and Asian counterparts.
Strategy’s index comes from a company with substantial stakes in Bitcoin adoption outcomes. Strategy holds 843,775 Bitcoin alongside a $3 billion USD reserve as of July 12, 2026, making it the world’s largest corporate Bitcoin treasury holder. The company’s interest in demonstrating institutional momentum is therefore not neutral. However, the underlying data points align with market reality: major banks have deployed Bitcoin infrastructure, but adoption remains fragmented across services and customer segments.
The Institutional Opportunity Ahead
The 32% adoption figure signals both achievement and runway. Banks have moved beyond discussing Bitcoin to deploying custody infrastructure, launching ETF products, and enabling client exposure. Yet the global financial system remains in early stages of digital asset integration — two-thirds of major banks score below 32%, suggesting substantial opportunity for institutions that increase their Bitcoin capabilities.
Michael Saylor, Strategy co-founder, has repeatedly emphasized that “limited banking acceptance” represents one of the primary obstacles to Bitcoin’s growth as a treasury asset. The index therefore serves as a report card not just for banks, but for the Bitcoin ecosystem’s path toward mainstream financial integration.
78
Artikel
Adopsi Bitcoin oleh Bank-Bank Besar Mencapai 32% — Fidelity Memimpin Saat Wall Street Perlahan Merangkul Digital...Keterlibatan dunia perbankan dengan Bitcoin dan aset digital sedang dipercepat, tetapi masih belum merata di seluruh institusi keuangan global. Indeks Adopsi Perbankan Bitcoin baru yang dirilis oleh Strategy Inc. pada 13 Juli 2026 mengungkapkan bahwa bank-bank besar mengintegrasikan layanan mata uang kripto dengan tingkat adopsi rata-rata 32% — sebuah metrik yang menegaskan baik momentum institusional yang sedang berkembang maupun peluang besar yang masih belum tergarap di sektor tersebut.
CEO Strategi Phong Le menyatakan:
“Adopsi Bitcoin dan ekosistem aset digital terkait di antara bank-bank besar dan institusi keuangan sedang dipercepat, namun masih tergolong awal di angka 32%.”
Adopsi Bitcoin oleh Bank-Bank Besar Mencapai 32% — Fidelity Memimpin Saat Wall Street Perlahan Merangkul Digital...
Keterlibatan dunia perbankan dengan Bitcoin dan aset digital sedang dipercepat, tetapi masih belum merata di seluruh institusi keuangan global. Indeks Adopsi Perbankan Bitcoin baru yang dirilis oleh Strategy Inc. pada 13 Juli 2026 mengungkapkan bahwa bank-bank besar mengintegrasikan layanan mata uang kripto dengan tingkat adopsi rata-rata 32% — sebuah metrik yang menegaskan baik momentum institusional yang sedang berkembang maupun peluang besar yang masih belum tergarap di sektor tersebut.
CEO Strategi Phong Le menyatakan:
“Adopsi Bitcoin dan ekosistem aset digital terkait di antara bank-bank besar dan institusi keuangan sedang dipercepat, namun masih tergolong awal di angka 32%.”
CEO Strategi Phong Le menyatakan:
“Adopsi Bitcoin dan ekosistem aset digital terkait di antara bank-bank besar dan institusi keuangan sedang dipercepat, namun masih tergolong awal di angka 32%.”
173
Artikel
Lihat terjemahan
The European Parliament Approved Mass Message Scanning Through a Procedural Loophole — Here’s Wha...In one of the most controversial parliamentary maneuvers in recent European legislative history, the European Parliament approved the reinstatement of Chat Control 1.0 on July 9, 2026 — a regulation that allows technology companies to scan private messages for illegal content. The vote outcome was stunning: 314 lawmakers voted against it, yet the measure passed anyway. Understanding how this happened requires knowing how European parliamentary procedures work — and why tech companies, cryptography experts, and privacy advocates are alarmed.
What Exactly Is Chat Control 1.0?
Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption to European privacy laws that permits messaging platforms like Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Snapchat, and Skype to voluntarily scan users’ private communications. The platforms search for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) — images and videos of child exploitation — and report findings to law enforcement authorities.
The system works using hash matching, a technique that compares files against a database of known illegal content. When a match is found, the platform flags the conversation and reports it to authorities. In theory, the system focuses on already-identified abuse material, not new material.
Here’s the important distinction: platforms are allowed to scan, but they are not required to do so. It is voluntary. Additionally, services using end-to-end encryption — including WhatsApp and Signal, where the platform itself cannot see message contents — remain exempt from this rule. The company cannot scan what it cannot access.
How Did This Pass If Most Lawmakers Voted Against It?
This is where the procedural complexity becomes crucial. Chat Control 1.0 expired on April 3, 2026, after the European Parliament rejected its extension in March. The vote was decisive: 311 MEPs (Members of European Parliament) opposed renewal, 228 supported it, and 92 abstained. The matter appeared settled.
But on July 2, 2026, the European Council — representing the 27 member-state governments — unilaterally adopted Chat Control 1.0 as its official position for what is called a “second reading.” That procedural designation is the loophole. Under second-reading rules, Parliament cannot simply pass or reject a measure by a simple majority vote. Instead, lawmakers can only block or amend the Council’s proposal if they achieve an absolute majority of all 720 MEPs — meaning 361 votes are needed, not just a majority of those present.
On July 9, when the vote occurred, 607 MEPs were present and voting. Of those, 314 voted to reject the extension — a clear majority of attendees. But because 361 votes were required to block it, and only 314 were cast in opposition, the measure passed by default. The extension survived not because it won an argument, but because it cleared a procedural threshold.
The timing compounded the controversy. The vote was scheduled during the last parliamentary session before the summer recess, when attendance drops significantly. Around 112 MEPs were absent. Critics argue this wasn’t an accident — it was deliberately scheduled to minimize opposition votes.
The Democratic Problem
Privacy advocates and cybersecurity experts immediately flagged a fundamental issue: how can lawmakers who reject something democratically find it imposed through procedural maneuvering?
Former MEP Patrick Breyer, a long-time privacy advocate, stated bluntly:
“The fact that Chat Control is moving forward against the will of the majority of voting MEPs is a farce and damages democracy.” MEP Markéta Gregorová added that the move violated “our own rules of procedure” and accused the largest parliamentary bloc, the European People’s Party, of abusing its position to resurrect a proposal the Parliament had already rejected.
The paradox is stark: more lawmakers voted against Chat Control than for it. Yet it passed.
What This Means for Regular Users
If you use Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Instagram Direct Messages, Snapchat, Skype, or similar platforms in Europe, those services now have legal permission to scan your messages. The company will look for images and videos of child abuse and report them to authorities if found. Importantly, text messages are not scanned — only images and videos.
If you use WhatsApp, Signal, or other end-to-end encrypted services, your messages remain unscanned. These platforms encrypt data so thoroughly that even the company operating the service cannot see what users send to each other. Chat Control 1.0 explicitly exempts these services.
The regulation will remain in effect until April 3, 2028, while European lawmakers negotiate Chat Control 2.0 — a more permanent, more invasive framework that could potentially require scanning of encrypted messages using artificial intelligence.
The Crypto and Tech Industry Impact
The crypto community and Web3 developers view Chat Control 1.0 as a warning signal. Here’s why: the technology used to encrypt private messages is the same cryptographic foundation that secures blockchain networks and cryptocurrency wallets. If European regulators successfully mandate breaking or weakening encryption for messaging, they will create pressure to apply similar rules to cryptocurrency platforms.
Companies like Signal have already threatened to withdraw from the EU entirely if Chat Control 2.0 passes. Exodus to non-regulated jurisdictions would mean European users losing access to secure communications tools.
For artificial intelligence developers, the concern is different but related. Chat Control relies increasingly on AI systems to detect abuse material, including new or modified images the system hasn’t encountered before. The European Commission’s own testing found these AI systems produced false positives “as high as 20 percent” — meaning one in five flagged conversations were not actually illegal content. Expanding AI-based scanning creates risks of innocent users being flagged to authorities based on algorithmic error.
What’s Coming Next: Chat Control 2.0
This vote does not finalize European privacy policy. Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption. The real battle is over Chat Control 2.0 — formally called the Child Sexual Abuse Regulation (CSAR) — which has been under negotiation since 2022 and remains deeply contested.
Chat Control 2.0 could require platforms to scan encrypted messages by implementing “client-side scanning” — technology that analyzes content on a user’s device before it gets encrypted. Such technology would effectively weaken end-to-end encryption, creating vulnerabilities that governments, criminals, and hackers could potentially exploit.
Negotiations on Chat Control 2.0 resume in September 2026. The vote count on Chat Control 1.0 suggests support is fragile: if lawmakers achieve even a simple majority against a permanent framework, it could be blocked.
The Bigger Picture
Chat Control 1.0’s passage through procedural maneuvering raises questions about EU decision-making. Parliamentary rules designed to protect minority interests became, in this case, a tool for passing legislation against the majority’s explicit vote. European lawmakers and analysts are asking whether procedural safeguards work as intended or whether they can be weaponized to resurrect rejected proposals.
For cryptocurrency, Web3, and privacy-focused tech companies, the message is clear: Europe’s regulatory environment continues tightening around encryption, data access, and communications privacy. Whether Chat Control 2.0 advances will depend on whether lawmakers value privacy rights or regulatory access in 2026-2027.
The European Parliament Approved Mass Message Scanning Through a Procedural Loophole — Here’s Wha...
In one of the most controversial parliamentary maneuvers in recent European legislative history, the European Parliament approved the reinstatement of Chat Control 1.0 on July 9, 2026 — a regulation that allows technology companies to scan private messages for illegal content. The vote outcome was stunning: 314 lawmakers voted against it, yet the measure passed anyway. Understanding how this happened requires knowing how European parliamentary procedures work — and why tech companies, cryptography experts, and privacy advocates are alarmed.
What Exactly Is Chat Control 1.0?
Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption to European privacy laws that permits messaging platforms like Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Snapchat, and Skype to voluntarily scan users’ private communications. The platforms search for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) — images and videos of child exploitation — and report findings to law enforcement authorities.
The system works using hash matching, a technique that compares files against a database of known illegal content. When a match is found, the platform flags the conversation and reports it to authorities. In theory, the system focuses on already-identified abuse material, not new material.
Here’s the important distinction: platforms are allowed to scan, but they are not required to do so. It is voluntary. Additionally, services using end-to-end encryption — including WhatsApp and Signal, where the platform itself cannot see message contents — remain exempt from this rule. The company cannot scan what it cannot access.
How Did This Pass If Most Lawmakers Voted Against It?
This is where the procedural complexity becomes crucial. Chat Control 1.0 expired on April 3, 2026, after the European Parliament rejected its extension in March. The vote was decisive: 311 MEPs (Members of European Parliament) opposed renewal, 228 supported it, and 92 abstained. The matter appeared settled.
But on July 2, 2026, the European Council — representing the 27 member-state governments — unilaterally adopted Chat Control 1.0 as its official position for what is called a “second reading.” That procedural designation is the loophole. Under second-reading rules, Parliament cannot simply pass or reject a measure by a simple majority vote. Instead, lawmakers can only block or amend the Council’s proposal if they achieve an absolute majority of all 720 MEPs — meaning 361 votes are needed, not just a majority of those present.
On July 9, when the vote occurred, 607 MEPs were present and voting. Of those, 314 voted to reject the extension — a clear majority of attendees. But because 361 votes were required to block it, and only 314 were cast in opposition, the measure passed by default. The extension survived not because it won an argument, but because it cleared a procedural threshold.
The timing compounded the controversy. The vote was scheduled during the last parliamentary session before the summer recess, when attendance drops significantly. Around 112 MEPs were absent. Critics argue this wasn’t an accident — it was deliberately scheduled to minimize opposition votes.
The Democratic Problem
Privacy advocates and cybersecurity experts immediately flagged a fundamental issue: how can lawmakers who reject something democratically find it imposed through procedural maneuvering?
Former MEP Patrick Breyer, a long-time privacy advocate, stated bluntly:
“The fact that Chat Control is moving forward against the will of the majority of voting MEPs is a farce and damages democracy.” MEP Markéta Gregorová added that the move violated “our own rules of procedure” and accused the largest parliamentary bloc, the European People’s Party, of abusing its position to resurrect a proposal the Parliament had already rejected.
The paradox is stark: more lawmakers voted against Chat Control than for it. Yet it passed.
What This Means for Regular Users
If you use Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Instagram Direct Messages, Snapchat, Skype, or similar platforms in Europe, those services now have legal permission to scan your messages. The company will look for images and videos of child abuse and report them to authorities if found. Importantly, text messages are not scanned — only images and videos.
If you use WhatsApp, Signal, or other end-to-end encrypted services, your messages remain unscanned. These platforms encrypt data so thoroughly that even the company operating the service cannot see what users send to each other. Chat Control 1.0 explicitly exempts these services.
The regulation will remain in effect until April 3, 2028, while European lawmakers negotiate Chat Control 2.0 — a more permanent, more invasive framework that could potentially require scanning of encrypted messages using artificial intelligence.
The Crypto and Tech Industry Impact
The crypto community and Web3 developers view Chat Control 1.0 as a warning signal. Here’s why: the technology used to encrypt private messages is the same cryptographic foundation that secures blockchain networks and cryptocurrency wallets. If European regulators successfully mandate breaking or weakening encryption for messaging, they will create pressure to apply similar rules to cryptocurrency platforms.
Companies like Signal have already threatened to withdraw from the EU entirely if Chat Control 2.0 passes. Exodus to non-regulated jurisdictions would mean European users losing access to secure communications tools.
For artificial intelligence developers, the concern is different but related. Chat Control relies increasingly on AI systems to detect abuse material, including new or modified images the system hasn’t encountered before. The European Commission’s own testing found these AI systems produced false positives “as high as 20 percent” — meaning one in five flagged conversations were not actually illegal content. Expanding AI-based scanning creates risks of innocent users being flagged to authorities based on algorithmic error.
What’s Coming Next: Chat Control 2.0
This vote does not finalize European privacy policy. Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption. The real battle is over Chat Control 2.0 — formally called the Child Sexual Abuse Regulation (CSAR) — which has been under negotiation since 2022 and remains deeply contested.
Chat Control 2.0 could require platforms to scan encrypted messages by implementing “client-side scanning” — technology that analyzes content on a user’s device before it gets encrypted. Such technology would effectively weaken end-to-end encryption, creating vulnerabilities that governments, criminals, and hackers could potentially exploit.
Negotiations on Chat Control 2.0 resume in September 2026. The vote count on Chat Control 1.0 suggests support is fragile: if lawmakers achieve even a simple majority against a permanent framework, it could be blocked.
The Bigger Picture
Chat Control 1.0’s passage through procedural maneuvering raises questions about EU decision-making. Parliamentary rules designed to protect minority interests became, in this case, a tool for passing legislation against the majority’s explicit vote. European lawmakers and analysts are asking whether procedural safeguards work as intended or whether they can be weaponized to resurrect rejected proposals.
For cryptocurrency, Web3, and privacy-focused tech companies, the message is clear: Europe’s regulatory environment continues tightening around encryption, data access, and communications privacy. Whether Chat Control 2.0 advances will depend on whether lawmakers value privacy rights or regulatory access in 2026-2027.
What Exactly Is Chat Control 1.0?
Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption to European privacy laws that permits messaging platforms like Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Snapchat, and Skype to voluntarily scan users’ private communications. The platforms search for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) — images and videos of child exploitation — and report findings to law enforcement authorities.
The system works using hash matching, a technique that compares files against a database of known illegal content. When a match is found, the platform flags the conversation and reports it to authorities. In theory, the system focuses on already-identified abuse material, not new material.
Here’s the important distinction: platforms are allowed to scan, but they are not required to do so. It is voluntary. Additionally, services using end-to-end encryption — including WhatsApp and Signal, where the platform itself cannot see message contents — remain exempt from this rule. The company cannot scan what it cannot access.
How Did This Pass If Most Lawmakers Voted Against It?
This is where the procedural complexity becomes crucial. Chat Control 1.0 expired on April 3, 2026, after the European Parliament rejected its extension in March. The vote was decisive: 311 MEPs (Members of European Parliament) opposed renewal, 228 supported it, and 92 abstained. The matter appeared settled.
But on July 2, 2026, the European Council — representing the 27 member-state governments — unilaterally adopted Chat Control 1.0 as its official position for what is called a “second reading.” That procedural designation is the loophole. Under second-reading rules, Parliament cannot simply pass or reject a measure by a simple majority vote. Instead, lawmakers can only block or amend the Council’s proposal if they achieve an absolute majority of all 720 MEPs — meaning 361 votes are needed, not just a majority of those present.
On July 9, when the vote occurred, 607 MEPs were present and voting. Of those, 314 voted to reject the extension — a clear majority of attendees. But because 361 votes were required to block it, and only 314 were cast in opposition, the measure passed by default. The extension survived not because it won an argument, but because it cleared a procedural threshold.
The timing compounded the controversy. The vote was scheduled during the last parliamentary session before the summer recess, when attendance drops significantly. Around 112 MEPs were absent. Critics argue this wasn’t an accident — it was deliberately scheduled to minimize opposition votes.
The Democratic Problem
Privacy advocates and cybersecurity experts immediately flagged a fundamental issue: how can lawmakers who reject something democratically find it imposed through procedural maneuvering?
Former MEP Patrick Breyer, a long-time privacy advocate, stated bluntly:
“The fact that Chat Control is moving forward against the will of the majority of voting MEPs is a farce and damages democracy.” MEP Markéta Gregorová added that the move violated “our own rules of procedure” and accused the largest parliamentary bloc, the European People’s Party, of abusing its position to resurrect a proposal the Parliament had already rejected.
The paradox is stark: more lawmakers voted against Chat Control than for it. Yet it passed.
What This Means for Regular Users
If you use Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Instagram Direct Messages, Snapchat, Skype, or similar platforms in Europe, those services now have legal permission to scan your messages. The company will look for images and videos of child abuse and report them to authorities if found. Importantly, text messages are not scanned — only images and videos.
If you use WhatsApp, Signal, or other end-to-end encrypted services, your messages remain unscanned. These platforms encrypt data so thoroughly that even the company operating the service cannot see what users send to each other. Chat Control 1.0 explicitly exempts these services.
The regulation will remain in effect until April 3, 2028, while European lawmakers negotiate Chat Control 2.0 — a more permanent, more invasive framework that could potentially require scanning of encrypted messages using artificial intelligence.
The Crypto and Tech Industry Impact
The crypto community and Web3 developers view Chat Control 1.0 as a warning signal. Here’s why: the technology used to encrypt private messages is the same cryptographic foundation that secures blockchain networks and cryptocurrency wallets. If European regulators successfully mandate breaking or weakening encryption for messaging, they will create pressure to apply similar rules to cryptocurrency platforms.
Companies like Signal have already threatened to withdraw from the EU entirely if Chat Control 2.0 passes. Exodus to non-regulated jurisdictions would mean European users losing access to secure communications tools.
For artificial intelligence developers, the concern is different but related. Chat Control relies increasingly on AI systems to detect abuse material, including new or modified images the system hasn’t encountered before. The European Commission’s own testing found these AI systems produced false positives “as high as 20 percent” — meaning one in five flagged conversations were not actually illegal content. Expanding AI-based scanning creates risks of innocent users being flagged to authorities based on algorithmic error.
What’s Coming Next: Chat Control 2.0
This vote does not finalize European privacy policy. Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption. The real battle is over Chat Control 2.0 — formally called the Child Sexual Abuse Regulation (CSAR) — which has been under negotiation since 2022 and remains deeply contested.
Chat Control 2.0 could require platforms to scan encrypted messages by implementing “client-side scanning” — technology that analyzes content on a user’s device before it gets encrypted. Such technology would effectively weaken end-to-end encryption, creating vulnerabilities that governments, criminals, and hackers could potentially exploit.
Negotiations on Chat Control 2.0 resume in September 2026. The vote count on Chat Control 1.0 suggests support is fragile: if lawmakers achieve even a simple majority against a permanent framework, it could be blocked.
The Bigger Picture
Chat Control 1.0’s passage through procedural maneuvering raises questions about EU decision-making. Parliamentary rules designed to protect minority interests became, in this case, a tool for passing legislation against the majority’s explicit vote. European lawmakers and analysts are asking whether procedural safeguards work as intended or whether they can be weaponized to resurrect rejected proposals.
For cryptocurrency, Web3, and privacy-focused tech companies, the message is clear: Europe’s regulatory environment continues tightening around encryption, data access, and communications privacy. Whether Chat Control 2.0 advances will depend on whether lawmakers value privacy rights or regulatory access in 2026-2027.
128
Lihat terjemahan
The European Parliament Approved Mass Message Scanning Through a Procedural Loophole — Here’s Wha...In one of the most controversial parliamentary maneuvers in recent European legislative history, the European Parliament approved the reinstatement of Chat Control 1.0 on July 9, 2026 — a regulation that allows technology companies to scan private messages for illegal content. The vote outcome was stunning: 314 lawmakers voted against it, yet the measure passed anyway. Understanding how this happened requires knowing how European parliamentary procedures work — and why tech companies, cryptography experts, and privacy advocates are alarmed.
What Exactly Is Chat Control 1.0?
Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption to European privacy laws that permits messaging platforms like Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Snapchat, and Skype to voluntarily scan users’ private communications. The platforms search for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) — images and videos of child exploitation — and report findings to law enforcement authorities.
The system works using hash matching, a technique that compares files against a database of known illegal content. When a match is found, the platform flags the conversation and reports it to authorities. In theory, the system focuses on already-identified abuse material, not new material.
Here’s the important distinction: platforms are allowed to scan, but they are not required to do so. It is voluntary. Additionally, services using end-to-end encryption — including WhatsApp and Signal, where the platform itself cannot see message contents — remain exempt from this rule. The company cannot scan what it cannot access.
How Did This Pass If Most Lawmakers Voted Against It?
This is where the procedural complexity becomes crucial. Chat Control 1.0 expired on April 3, 2026, after the European Parliament rejected its extension in March. The vote was decisive: 311 MEPs (Members of European Parliament) opposed renewal, 228 supported it, and 92 abstained. The matter appeared settled.
But on July 2, 2026, the European Council — representing the 27 member-state governments — unilaterally adopted Chat Control 1.0 as its official position for what is called a “second reading.” That procedural designation is the loophole. Under second-reading rules, Parliament cannot simply pass or reject a measure by a simple majority vote. Instead, lawmakers can only block or amend the Council’s proposal if they achieve an absolute majority of all 720 MEPs — meaning 361 votes are needed, not just a majority of those present.
On July 9, when the vote occurred, 607 MEPs were present and voting. Of those, 314 voted to reject the extension — a clear majority of attendees. But because 361 votes were required to block it, and only 314 were cast in opposition, the measure passed by default. The extension survived not because it won an argument, but because it cleared a procedural threshold.
The timing compounded the controversy. The vote was scheduled during the last parliamentary session before the summer recess, when attendance drops significantly. Around 112 MEPs were absent. Critics argue this wasn’t an accident — it was deliberately scheduled to minimize opposition votes.
The Democratic Problem
Privacy advocates and cybersecurity experts immediately flagged a fundamental issue: how can lawmakers who reject something democratically find it imposed through procedural maneuvering?
Former MEP Patrick Breyer, a long-time privacy advocate, stated bluntly:
“The fact that Chat Control is moving forward against the will of the majority of voting MEPs is a farce and damages democracy.” MEP Markéta Gregorová added that the move violated “our own rules of procedure” and accused the largest parliamentary bloc, the European People’s Party, of abusing its position to resurrect a proposal the Parliament had already rejected.
The paradox is stark: more lawmakers voted against Chat Control than for it. Yet it passed.
What This Means for Regular Users
If you use Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Instagram Direct Messages, Snapchat, Skype, or similar platforms in Europe, those services now have legal permission to scan your messages. The company will look for images and videos of child abuse and report them to authorities if found. Importantly, text messages are not scanned — only images and videos.
If you use WhatsApp, Signal, or other end-to-end encrypted services, your messages remain unscanned. These platforms encrypt data so thoroughly that even the company operating the service cannot see what users send to each other. Chat Control 1.0 explicitly exempts these services.
The regulation will remain in effect until April 3, 2028, while European lawmakers negotiate Chat Control 2.0 — a more permanent, more invasive framework that could potentially require scanning of encrypted messages using artificial intelligence.
The Crypto and Tech Industry Impact
The crypto community and Web3 developers view Chat Control 1.0 as a warning signal. Here’s why: the technology used to encrypt private messages is the same cryptographic foundation that secures blockchain networks and cryptocurrency wallets. If European regulators successfully mandate breaking or weakening encryption for messaging, they will create pressure to apply similar rules to cryptocurrency platforms.
Companies like Signal have already threatened to withdraw from the EU entirely if Chat Control 2.0 passes. Exodus to non-regulated jurisdictions would mean European users losing access to secure communications tools.
For artificial intelligence developers, the concern is different but related. Chat Control relies increasingly on AI systems to detect abuse material, including new or modified images the system hasn’t encountered before. The European Commission’s own testing found these AI systems produced false positives “as high as 20 percent” — meaning one in five flagged conversations were not actually illegal content. Expanding AI-based scanning creates risks of innocent users being flagged to authorities based on algorithmic error.
What’s Coming Next: Chat Control 2.0
This vote does not finalize European privacy policy. Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption. The real battle is over Chat Control 2.0 — formally called the Child Sexual Abuse Regulation (CSAR) — which has been under negotiation since 2022 and remains deeply contested.
Chat Control 2.0 could require platforms to scan encrypted messages by implementing “client-side scanning” — technology that analyzes content on a user’s device before it gets encrypted. Such technology would effectively weaken end-to-end encryption, creating vulnerabilities that governments, criminals, and hackers could potentially exploit.
Negotiations on Chat Control 2.0 resume in September 2026. The vote count on Chat Control 1.0 suggests support is fragile: if lawmakers achieve even a simple majority against a permanent framework, it could be blocked.
The Bigger Picture
Chat Control 1.0’s passage through procedural maneuvering raises questions about EU decision-making. Parliamentary rules designed to protect minority interests became, in this case, a tool for passing legislation against the majority’s explicit vote. European lawmakers and analysts are asking whether procedural safeguards work as intended or whether they can be weaponized to resurrect rejected proposals.
For cryptocurrency, Web3, and privacy-focused tech companies, the message is clear: Europe’s regulatory environment continues tightening around encryption, data access, and communications privacy. Whether Chat Control 2.0 advances will depend on whether lawmakers value privacy rights or regulatory access in 2026-2027.
The European Parliament Approved Mass Message Scanning Through a Procedural Loophole — Here’s Wha...
In one of the most controversial parliamentary maneuvers in recent European legislative history, the European Parliament approved the reinstatement of Chat Control 1.0 on July 9, 2026 — a regulation that allows technology companies to scan private messages for illegal content. The vote outcome was stunning: 314 lawmakers voted against it, yet the measure passed anyway. Understanding how this happened requires knowing how European parliamentary procedures work — and why tech companies, cryptography experts, and privacy advocates are alarmed.
What Exactly Is Chat Control 1.0?
Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption to European privacy laws that permits messaging platforms like Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Snapchat, and Skype to voluntarily scan users’ private communications. The platforms search for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) — images and videos of child exploitation — and report findings to law enforcement authorities.
The system works using hash matching, a technique that compares files against a database of known illegal content. When a match is found, the platform flags the conversation and reports it to authorities. In theory, the system focuses on already-identified abuse material, not new material.
Here’s the important distinction: platforms are allowed to scan, but they are not required to do so. It is voluntary. Additionally, services using end-to-end encryption — including WhatsApp and Signal, where the platform itself cannot see message contents — remain exempt from this rule. The company cannot scan what it cannot access.
How Did This Pass If Most Lawmakers Voted Against It?
This is where the procedural complexity becomes crucial. Chat Control 1.0 expired on April 3, 2026, after the European Parliament rejected its extension in March. The vote was decisive: 311 MEPs (Members of European Parliament) opposed renewal, 228 supported it, and 92 abstained. The matter appeared settled.
But on July 2, 2026, the European Council — representing the 27 member-state governments — unilaterally adopted Chat Control 1.0 as its official position for what is called a “second reading.” That procedural designation is the loophole. Under second-reading rules, Parliament cannot simply pass or reject a measure by a simple majority vote. Instead, lawmakers can only block or amend the Council’s proposal if they achieve an absolute majority of all 720 MEPs — meaning 361 votes are needed, not just a majority of those present.
On July 9, when the vote occurred, 607 MEPs were present and voting. Of those, 314 voted to reject the extension — a clear majority of attendees. But because 361 votes were required to block it, and only 314 were cast in opposition, the measure passed by default. The extension survived not because it won an argument, but because it cleared a procedural threshold.
The timing compounded the controversy. The vote was scheduled during the last parliamentary session before the summer recess, when attendance drops significantly. Around 112 MEPs were absent. Critics argue this wasn’t an accident — it was deliberately scheduled to minimize opposition votes.
The Democratic Problem
Privacy advocates and cybersecurity experts immediately flagged a fundamental issue: how can lawmakers who reject something democratically find it imposed through procedural maneuvering?
Former MEP Patrick Breyer, a long-time privacy advocate, stated bluntly:
“The fact that Chat Control is moving forward against the will of the majority of voting MEPs is a farce and damages democracy.” MEP Markéta Gregorová added that the move violated “our own rules of procedure” and accused the largest parliamentary bloc, the European People’s Party, of abusing its position to resurrect a proposal the Parliament had already rejected.
The paradox is stark: more lawmakers voted against Chat Control than for it. Yet it passed.
What This Means for Regular Users
If you use Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Instagram Direct Messages, Snapchat, Skype, or similar platforms in Europe, those services now have legal permission to scan your messages. The company will look for images and videos of child abuse and report them to authorities if found. Importantly, text messages are not scanned — only images and videos.
If you use WhatsApp, Signal, or other end-to-end encrypted services, your messages remain unscanned. These platforms encrypt data so thoroughly that even the company operating the service cannot see what users send to each other. Chat Control 1.0 explicitly exempts these services.
The regulation will remain in effect until April 3, 2028, while European lawmakers negotiate Chat Control 2.0 — a more permanent, more invasive framework that could potentially require scanning of encrypted messages using artificial intelligence.
The Crypto and Tech Industry Impact
The crypto community and Web3 developers view Chat Control 1.0 as a warning signal. Here’s why: the technology used to encrypt private messages is the same cryptographic foundation that secures blockchain networks and cryptocurrency wallets. If European regulators successfully mandate breaking or weakening encryption for messaging, they will create pressure to apply similar rules to cryptocurrency platforms.
Companies like Signal have already threatened to withdraw from the EU entirely if Chat Control 2.0 passes. Exodus to non-regulated jurisdictions would mean European users losing access to secure communications tools.
For artificial intelligence developers, the concern is different but related. Chat Control relies increasingly on AI systems to detect abuse material, including new or modified images the system hasn’t encountered before. The European Commission’s own testing found these AI systems produced false positives “as high as 20 percent” — meaning one in five flagged conversations were not actually illegal content. Expanding AI-based scanning creates risks of innocent users being flagged to authorities based on algorithmic error.
What’s Coming Next: Chat Control 2.0
This vote does not finalize European privacy policy. Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption. The real battle is over Chat Control 2.0 — formally called the Child Sexual Abuse Regulation (CSAR) — which has been under negotiation since 2022 and remains deeply contested.
Chat Control 2.0 could require platforms to scan encrypted messages by implementing “client-side scanning” — technology that analyzes content on a user’s device before it gets encrypted. Such technology would effectively weaken end-to-end encryption, creating vulnerabilities that governments, criminals, and hackers could potentially exploit.
Negotiations on Chat Control 2.0 resume in September 2026. The vote count on Chat Control 1.0 suggests support is fragile: if lawmakers achieve even a simple majority against a permanent framework, it could be blocked.
The Bigger Picture
Chat Control 1.0’s passage through procedural maneuvering raises questions about EU decision-making. Parliamentary rules designed to protect minority interests became, in this case, a tool for passing legislation against the majority’s explicit vote. European lawmakers and analysts are asking whether procedural safeguards work as intended or whether they can be weaponized to resurrect rejected proposals.
For cryptocurrency, Web3, and privacy-focused tech companies, the message is clear: Europe’s regulatory environment continues tightening around encryption, data access, and communications privacy. Whether Chat Control 2.0 advances will depend on whether lawmakers value privacy rights or regulatory access in 2026-2027.
What Exactly Is Chat Control 1.0?
Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption to European privacy laws that permits messaging platforms like Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Snapchat, and Skype to voluntarily scan users’ private communications. The platforms search for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) — images and videos of child exploitation — and report findings to law enforcement authorities.
The system works using hash matching, a technique that compares files against a database of known illegal content. When a match is found, the platform flags the conversation and reports it to authorities. In theory, the system focuses on already-identified abuse material, not new material.
Here’s the important distinction: platforms are allowed to scan, but they are not required to do so. It is voluntary. Additionally, services using end-to-end encryption — including WhatsApp and Signal, where the platform itself cannot see message contents — remain exempt from this rule. The company cannot scan what it cannot access.
How Did This Pass If Most Lawmakers Voted Against It?
This is where the procedural complexity becomes crucial. Chat Control 1.0 expired on April 3, 2026, after the European Parliament rejected its extension in March. The vote was decisive: 311 MEPs (Members of European Parliament) opposed renewal, 228 supported it, and 92 abstained. The matter appeared settled.
But on July 2, 2026, the European Council — representing the 27 member-state governments — unilaterally adopted Chat Control 1.0 as its official position for what is called a “second reading.” That procedural designation is the loophole. Under second-reading rules, Parliament cannot simply pass or reject a measure by a simple majority vote. Instead, lawmakers can only block or amend the Council’s proposal if they achieve an absolute majority of all 720 MEPs — meaning 361 votes are needed, not just a majority of those present.
On July 9, when the vote occurred, 607 MEPs were present and voting. Of those, 314 voted to reject the extension — a clear majority of attendees. But because 361 votes were required to block it, and only 314 were cast in opposition, the measure passed by default. The extension survived not because it won an argument, but because it cleared a procedural threshold.
The timing compounded the controversy. The vote was scheduled during the last parliamentary session before the summer recess, when attendance drops significantly. Around 112 MEPs were absent. Critics argue this wasn’t an accident — it was deliberately scheduled to minimize opposition votes.
The Democratic Problem
Privacy advocates and cybersecurity experts immediately flagged a fundamental issue: how can lawmakers who reject something democratically find it imposed through procedural maneuvering?
Former MEP Patrick Breyer, a long-time privacy advocate, stated bluntly:
“The fact that Chat Control is moving forward against the will of the majority of voting MEPs is a farce and damages democracy.” MEP Markéta Gregorová added that the move violated “our own rules of procedure” and accused the largest parliamentary bloc, the European People’s Party, of abusing its position to resurrect a proposal the Parliament had already rejected.
The paradox is stark: more lawmakers voted against Chat Control than for it. Yet it passed.
What This Means for Regular Users
If you use Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Instagram Direct Messages, Snapchat, Skype, or similar platforms in Europe, those services now have legal permission to scan your messages. The company will look for images and videos of child abuse and report them to authorities if found. Importantly, text messages are not scanned — only images and videos.
If you use WhatsApp, Signal, or other end-to-end encrypted services, your messages remain unscanned. These platforms encrypt data so thoroughly that even the company operating the service cannot see what users send to each other. Chat Control 1.0 explicitly exempts these services.
The regulation will remain in effect until April 3, 2028, while European lawmakers negotiate Chat Control 2.0 — a more permanent, more invasive framework that could potentially require scanning of encrypted messages using artificial intelligence.
The Crypto and Tech Industry Impact
The crypto community and Web3 developers view Chat Control 1.0 as a warning signal. Here’s why: the technology used to encrypt private messages is the same cryptographic foundation that secures blockchain networks and cryptocurrency wallets. If European regulators successfully mandate breaking or weakening encryption for messaging, they will create pressure to apply similar rules to cryptocurrency platforms.
Companies like Signal have already threatened to withdraw from the EU entirely if Chat Control 2.0 passes. Exodus to non-regulated jurisdictions would mean European users losing access to secure communications tools.
For artificial intelligence developers, the concern is different but related. Chat Control relies increasingly on AI systems to detect abuse material, including new or modified images the system hasn’t encountered before. The European Commission’s own testing found these AI systems produced false positives “as high as 20 percent” — meaning one in five flagged conversations were not actually illegal content. Expanding AI-based scanning creates risks of innocent users being flagged to authorities based on algorithmic error.
What’s Coming Next: Chat Control 2.0
This vote does not finalize European privacy policy. Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption. The real battle is over Chat Control 2.0 — formally called the Child Sexual Abuse Regulation (CSAR) — which has been under negotiation since 2022 and remains deeply contested.
Chat Control 2.0 could require platforms to scan encrypted messages by implementing “client-side scanning” — technology that analyzes content on a user’s device before it gets encrypted. Such technology would effectively weaken end-to-end encryption, creating vulnerabilities that governments, criminals, and hackers could potentially exploit.
Negotiations on Chat Control 2.0 resume in September 2026. The vote count on Chat Control 1.0 suggests support is fragile: if lawmakers achieve even a simple majority against a permanent framework, it could be blocked.
The Bigger Picture
Chat Control 1.0’s passage through procedural maneuvering raises questions about EU decision-making. Parliamentary rules designed to protect minority interests became, in this case, a tool for passing legislation against the majority’s explicit vote. European lawmakers and analysts are asking whether procedural safeguards work as intended or whether they can be weaponized to resurrect rejected proposals.
For cryptocurrency, Web3, and privacy-focused tech companies, the message is clear: Europe’s regulatory environment continues tightening around encryption, data access, and communications privacy. Whether Chat Control 2.0 advances will depend on whether lawmakers value privacy rights or regulatory access in 2026-2027.
101
Artikel
Lihat terjemahan
Hernando De Soto Plantea Uso De Blockchain Para Impulsar La Economía Peruana: “Activos Deben Conv...Hernando de Soto plantea uso de blockchain para impulsar la economía peruana: “Activos deben convertirse en capital productivo”
Excandidato presidencial propone que títulos de las propiedades, concesiones y contratos sean cotizados como capital de inversión y de esa manera combatir la economía informal.
De Soto expondrá sus planteamientos en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026, este 11 de julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar, junto a destacados representantes de empresas líderes del ecosistema blockchain y crypto global.
Lima, Perú — El economista y excandidato presidencial, Hernando de Soto, planteó una innovadora propuesta económica orientada a la inclusión financiera de los sectores más vulnerables del país, sugiriendo el uso de la tecnología blockchain y sistemas de criptoactivos para dinamizar la economía nacional.
Según explicó De Soto, gran parte de los peruanos en situación de pobreza habitan sobre algunos de los territorios más ricos del país; sin embargo, la falta de títulos formales impide a millones de peruanos convertir sus activos -como tierras, negocios o recursos- en capital productivo, dejándolos excluidos del sistema financiero.
“Por qué, los más pobres, la mayor parte de ellos propietarios y emprendedores, se encuentran en los territorios más ricos del Perú y no pueden capitalizarse para entrar en la revolución industrial. La respuesta es que los títulos de las propiedades, las concesiones y los contratos que los vinculan al mundo, y que deberían permitirles generar capital, tienen serias limitaciones”, sostuvo De Soto, quien brindará una charla sobre este tema en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026 que se desarrollará este sábado en Lima.
Para resolver esta problemática, el economista propone que estos recursos de poco valor sean transformados en activos altamente rentables. La estrategia consiste en que, además de ser valorizados localmente, puedan ser cotizados como capital de inversión, lo que ayudará a incluir en el sistema financiero del país a millones de personas.
Perú recibirá a expertos de tecnología blockchain y ecosistema crypto
De Soto expondrá estos planteamientos durante la charla que dará en la quinta edición del Perú Blockchain Conference, evento que se realizará el 11 de Julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar en Miraflores, que contará también con entradas gratuitas por tiempo limitado. Organizado por LATAM Blockchain Events LLC, el encuentro se consolida como el evento más importante del país en crypto, blockchain, trading, activos digitales e innovación financiera, reuniendo a líderes globales de la industria, empresas tecnológicas, instituciones, inversionistas, traders, comunidades Web3 y público interesado en las nuevas tecnologías financieras.
Durante los últimos dos años, el mercado peruano ha mostrado un crecimiento sostenido en la adopción de activos digitales y tecnología blockchain, pasando de ser un simple espectador a convertirse en protagonista, posicionándose como uno de los mercados con mayor proyección en América Latina.
Según el Informe Blockchain LATAM 2025 de Sherlock Communications, el 3.7% de peruanos ya es usuario de criptomonedas, lo que equivale a más de un millón de personas, duplicando la cantidad registrada hace menos de dos años. Asimismo, el Global Crypto Adoption Index de Chainalysis coloca al país en el puesto 7 de adopción de criptomonedas a nivel regional y en el puesto 42 a nivel mundial.
A esto se suma el crecimiento del uso de stablecoins como mecanismo de resguardo, pagos internacionales y remesas digitales, especialmente en un entorno donde la eficiencia transfronteriza y la dolarización digital ganan relevancia entre usuarios y empresas. Reportes de mercado señalan que las stablecoins representan ya una parte significativa de la actividad cripto en Perú, impulsadas por la interoperabilidad entre fintechs, wallets y el sistema financiero tradicional, logrando, incluso, que el Banco Central de Reserva de Perú destaque sus ventajas tangibles frente a los sistemas tradicionales.
“Perú vive hoy uno de los momentos más importantes para la evolución del ecosistema blockchain y de activos digitales en la región. Ya no solo somos eventos; somos un puente para acelerar la adopción cripto responsable, la educación financiera y la conexión entre empresas, instituciones y comunidad. Esta quinta edición de Perú Blockchain Conference representa la consolidación de un espacio estratégico para impulsar con profesionalismo, visión regional y compromiso el crecimiento sostenible del ecosistema Web3 en el país y en Latinoamérica”, aseguró Kristopher Panana, Fundador de Perú Blockchain Conference.
Más información y entradas:Perú Blockchain Conference 2026
Hernando De Soto Plantea Uso De Blockchain Para Impulsar La Economía Peruana: “Activos Deben Conv...
Hernando de Soto plantea uso de blockchain para impulsar la economía peruana: “Activos deben convertirse en capital productivo”
Excandidato presidencial propone que títulos de las propiedades, concesiones y contratos sean cotizados como capital de inversión y de esa manera combatir la economía informal.
De Soto expondrá sus planteamientos en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026, este 11 de julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar, junto a destacados representantes de empresas líderes del ecosistema blockchain y crypto global.
Lima, Perú — El economista y excandidato presidencial, Hernando de Soto, planteó una innovadora propuesta económica orientada a la inclusión financiera de los sectores más vulnerables del país, sugiriendo el uso de la tecnología blockchain y sistemas de criptoactivos para dinamizar la economía nacional.
Según explicó De Soto, gran parte de los peruanos en situación de pobreza habitan sobre algunos de los territorios más ricos del país; sin embargo, la falta de títulos formales impide a millones de peruanos convertir sus activos -como tierras, negocios o recursos- en capital productivo, dejándolos excluidos del sistema financiero.
“Por qué, los más pobres, la mayor parte de ellos propietarios y emprendedores, se encuentran en los territorios más ricos del Perú y no pueden capitalizarse para entrar en la revolución industrial. La respuesta es que los títulos de las propiedades, las concesiones y los contratos que los vinculan al mundo, y que deberían permitirles generar capital, tienen serias limitaciones”, sostuvo De Soto, quien brindará una charla sobre este tema en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026 que se desarrollará este sábado en Lima.
Para resolver esta problemática, el economista propone que estos recursos de poco valor sean transformados en activos altamente rentables. La estrategia consiste en que, además de ser valorizados localmente, puedan ser cotizados como capital de inversión, lo que ayudará a incluir en el sistema financiero del país a millones de personas.
Perú recibirá a expertos de tecnología blockchain y ecosistema crypto
De Soto expondrá estos planteamientos durante la charla que dará en la quinta edición del Perú Blockchain Conference, evento que se realizará el 11 de Julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar en Miraflores, que contará también con entradas gratuitas por tiempo limitado. Organizado por LATAM Blockchain Events LLC, el encuentro se consolida como el evento más importante del país en crypto, blockchain, trading, activos digitales e innovación financiera, reuniendo a líderes globales de la industria, empresas tecnológicas, instituciones, inversionistas, traders, comunidades Web3 y público interesado en las nuevas tecnologías financieras.
Durante los últimos dos años, el mercado peruano ha mostrado un crecimiento sostenido en la adopción de activos digitales y tecnología blockchain, pasando de ser un simple espectador a convertirse en protagonista, posicionándose como uno de los mercados con mayor proyección en América Latina.
Según el Informe Blockchain LATAM 2025 de Sherlock Communications, el 3.7% de peruanos ya es usuario de criptomonedas, lo que equivale a más de un millón de personas, duplicando la cantidad registrada hace menos de dos años. Asimismo, el Global Crypto Adoption Index de Chainalysis coloca al país en el puesto 7 de adopción de criptomonedas a nivel regional y en el puesto 42 a nivel mundial.
A esto se suma el crecimiento del uso de stablecoins como mecanismo de resguardo, pagos internacionales y remesas digitales, especialmente en un entorno donde la eficiencia transfronteriza y la dolarización digital ganan relevancia entre usuarios y empresas. Reportes de mercado señalan que las stablecoins representan ya una parte significativa de la actividad cripto en Perú, impulsadas por la interoperabilidad entre fintechs, wallets y el sistema financiero tradicional, logrando, incluso, que el Banco Central de Reserva de Perú destaque sus ventajas tangibles frente a los sistemas tradicionales.
“Perú vive hoy uno de los momentos más importantes para la evolución del ecosistema blockchain y de activos digitales en la región. Ya no solo somos eventos; somos un puente para acelerar la adopción cripto responsable, la educación financiera y la conexión entre empresas, instituciones y comunidad. Esta quinta edición de Perú Blockchain Conference representa la consolidación de un espacio estratégico para impulsar con profesionalismo, visión regional y compromiso el crecimiento sostenible del ecosistema Web3 en el país y en Latinoamérica”, aseguró Kristopher Panana, Fundador de Perú Blockchain Conference.
Más información y entradas:Perú Blockchain Conference 2026
Excandidato presidencial propone que títulos de las propiedades, concesiones y contratos sean cotizados como capital de inversión y de esa manera combatir la economía informal.
De Soto expondrá sus planteamientos en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026, este 11 de julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar, junto a destacados representantes de empresas líderes del ecosistema blockchain y crypto global.
Lima, Perú — El economista y excandidato presidencial, Hernando de Soto, planteó una innovadora propuesta económica orientada a la inclusión financiera de los sectores más vulnerables del país, sugiriendo el uso de la tecnología blockchain y sistemas de criptoactivos para dinamizar la economía nacional.
Según explicó De Soto, gran parte de los peruanos en situación de pobreza habitan sobre algunos de los territorios más ricos del país; sin embargo, la falta de títulos formales impide a millones de peruanos convertir sus activos -como tierras, negocios o recursos- en capital productivo, dejándolos excluidos del sistema financiero.
“Por qué, los más pobres, la mayor parte de ellos propietarios y emprendedores, se encuentran en los territorios más ricos del Perú y no pueden capitalizarse para entrar en la revolución industrial. La respuesta es que los títulos de las propiedades, las concesiones y los contratos que los vinculan al mundo, y que deberían permitirles generar capital, tienen serias limitaciones”, sostuvo De Soto, quien brindará una charla sobre este tema en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026 que se desarrollará este sábado en Lima.
Para resolver esta problemática, el economista propone que estos recursos de poco valor sean transformados en activos altamente rentables. La estrategia consiste en que, además de ser valorizados localmente, puedan ser cotizados como capital de inversión, lo que ayudará a incluir en el sistema financiero del país a millones de personas.
Perú recibirá a expertos de tecnología blockchain y ecosistema crypto
De Soto expondrá estos planteamientos durante la charla que dará en la quinta edición del Perú Blockchain Conference, evento que se realizará el 11 de Julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar en Miraflores, que contará también con entradas gratuitas por tiempo limitado. Organizado por LATAM Blockchain Events LLC, el encuentro se consolida como el evento más importante del país en crypto, blockchain, trading, activos digitales e innovación financiera, reuniendo a líderes globales de la industria, empresas tecnológicas, instituciones, inversionistas, traders, comunidades Web3 y público interesado en las nuevas tecnologías financieras.
Durante los últimos dos años, el mercado peruano ha mostrado un crecimiento sostenido en la adopción de activos digitales y tecnología blockchain, pasando de ser un simple espectador a convertirse en protagonista, posicionándose como uno de los mercados con mayor proyección en América Latina.
Según el Informe Blockchain LATAM 2025 de Sherlock Communications, el 3.7% de peruanos ya es usuario de criptomonedas, lo que equivale a más de un millón de personas, duplicando la cantidad registrada hace menos de dos años. Asimismo, el Global Crypto Adoption Index de Chainalysis coloca al país en el puesto 7 de adopción de criptomonedas a nivel regional y en el puesto 42 a nivel mundial.
A esto se suma el crecimiento del uso de stablecoins como mecanismo de resguardo, pagos internacionales y remesas digitales, especialmente en un entorno donde la eficiencia transfronteriza y la dolarización digital ganan relevancia entre usuarios y empresas. Reportes de mercado señalan que las stablecoins representan ya una parte significativa de la actividad cripto en Perú, impulsadas por la interoperabilidad entre fintechs, wallets y el sistema financiero tradicional, logrando, incluso, que el Banco Central de Reserva de Perú destaque sus ventajas tangibles frente a los sistemas tradicionales.
“Perú vive hoy uno de los momentos más importantes para la evolución del ecosistema blockchain y de activos digitales en la región. Ya no solo somos eventos; somos un puente para acelerar la adopción cripto responsable, la educación financiera y la conexión entre empresas, instituciones y comunidad. Esta quinta edición de Perú Blockchain Conference representa la consolidación de un espacio estratégico para impulsar con profesionalismo, visión regional y compromiso el crecimiento sostenible del ecosistema Web3 en el país y en Latinoamérica”, aseguró Kristopher Panana, Fundador de Perú Blockchain Conference.
Más información y entradas:Perú Blockchain Conference 2026
82
Hernando de Soto mengusulkan pemanfaatan blockchain untuk mendorong ekonomi Peru: “Aset harus diubah menjadi modal produktif”Hernando de Soto mengusulkan pemanfaatan blockchain untuk mendorong ekonomi Peru: “Aset harus diubah menjadi modal produktif”
Mantan kandidat presiden mengusulkan agar judul kepemilikan atas properti, konsesi, dan kontrak diperdagangkan sebagai modal investasi, sehingga dengan demikian memerangi ekonomi informal.
De Soto akan memaparkan gagasannya di Peru Blockchain Conference 2026, pada 11 Juli mendatang di JW Marriott Larcomar, bersama perwakilan terkemuka dari perusahaan-perusahaan terkemuka di ekosistem blockchain dan crypto global.
Hernando de Soto mengusulkan pemanfaatan blockchain untuk mendorong ekonomi Peru: “Aset harus diubah menjadi modal produktif”
Hernando de Soto mengusulkan pemanfaatan blockchain untuk mendorong ekonomi Peru: “Aset harus diubah menjadi modal produktif”
Mantan kandidat presiden mengusulkan agar judul kepemilikan atas properti, konsesi, dan kontrak diperdagangkan sebagai modal investasi, sehingga dengan demikian memerangi ekonomi informal.
De Soto akan memaparkan gagasannya di Peru Blockchain Conference 2026, pada 11 Juli mendatang di JW Marriott Larcomar, bersama perwakilan terkemuka dari perusahaan-perusahaan terkemuka di ekosistem blockchain dan crypto global.
Mantan kandidat presiden mengusulkan agar judul kepemilikan atas properti, konsesi, dan kontrak diperdagangkan sebagai modal investasi, sehingga dengan demikian memerangi ekonomi informal.
De Soto akan memaparkan gagasannya di Peru Blockchain Conference 2026, pada 11 Juli mendatang di JW Marriott Larcomar, bersama perwakilan terkemuka dari perusahaan-perusahaan terkemuka di ekosistem blockchain dan crypto global.
112
Artikel
Konvensi Blockchain Eropa Kembali ke Barcelona untuk Pertemuan Pasca-MiCA Pertama di EropaKonvensi Blockchain Eropa Kembali ke Barcelona untuk Pertemuan Pasca-MiCA Pertama di Eropa
EBC12 menghadirkan pembicara dari J.P. Morgan, Financial Conduct Authority, Invesco, Coinbase, Fidelity International, dan lebih dari 300 pemimpin dari bank, regulator, dan manajer aset yang membentuk pasar aset digital Eropa.
Barcelona, Spanyol, 12 Juli 2026 — Sebelas minggu setelah tenggat waktu MiCA Uni Eropa, edisi ke-12 Konvensi Blockchain Eropa (EBC12) kembali ke Barcelona pada momen penting bagi industri. Ini adalah pertemuan kelembagaan utama pertama di kawasan tersebut sejak regulasi aset digital lintas batas yang komprehensif pertama di dunia sepenuhnya menjadi hukum, sekaligus menjadi acara tempat arus kesepakatan (deal flow) Eropa terjadi.
Konvensi Blockchain Eropa Kembali ke Barcelona untuk Pertemuan Pasca-MiCA Pertama di Eropa
Konvensi Blockchain Eropa Kembali ke Barcelona untuk Pertemuan Pasca-MiCA Pertama di Eropa
EBC12 menghadirkan pembicara dari J.P. Morgan, Financial Conduct Authority, Invesco, Coinbase, Fidelity International, dan lebih dari 300 pemimpin dari bank, regulator, dan manajer aset yang membentuk pasar aset digital Eropa.
Barcelona, Spanyol, 12 Juli 2026 — Sebelas minggu setelah tenggat waktu MiCA Uni Eropa, edisi ke-12 Konvensi Blockchain Eropa (EBC12) kembali ke Barcelona pada momen penting bagi industri. Ini adalah pertemuan kelembagaan utama pertama di kawasan tersebut sejak regulasi aset digital lintas batas yang komprehensif pertama di dunia sepenuhnya menjadi hukum, sekaligus menjadi acara tempat arus kesepakatan (deal flow) Eropa terjadi.
EBC12 menghadirkan pembicara dari J.P. Morgan, Financial Conduct Authority, Invesco, Coinbase, Fidelity International, dan lebih dari 300 pemimpin dari bank, regulator, dan manajer aset yang membentuk pasar aset digital Eropa.
Barcelona, Spanyol, 12 Juli 2026 — Sebelas minggu setelah tenggat waktu MiCA Uni Eropa, edisi ke-12 Konvensi Blockchain Eropa (EBC12) kembali ke Barcelona pada momen penting bagi industri. Ini adalah pertemuan kelembagaan utama pertama di kawasan tersebut sejak regulasi aset digital lintas batas yang komprehensif pertama di dunia sepenuhnya menjadi hukum, sekaligus menjadi acara tempat arus kesepakatan (deal flow) Eropa terjadi.
COINUS-2,09%
66
Konvensi Blockchain Eropa Kembali ke Barcelona untuk Pertemuan Pasca-MiCA Pertama di EropaKonvensi Blockchain Eropa Kembali ke Barcelona untuk Pertemuan Pasca-MiCA Pertama di Eropa
EBC12 menghadirkan pembicara dari J.P. Morgan, Financial Conduct Authority, Invesco, Coinbase, Fidelity International, dan lebih dari 300 pemimpin dari bank, regulator, dan manajer aset yang membentuk pasar aset digital Eropa.
Barcelona, Spanyol, Juli, 2026 — Sebelas minggu setelah tenggat waktu Peraturan Pasar Kripto Uni Eropa (MiCA), edisi ke-12 Konvensi Blockchain Eropa (EBC12) kembali ke Barcelona pada momen penting bagi industri. Ini adalah pertemuan institusional besar pertama di kawasan ini sejak regulasi aset digital lintas negara yang komprehensif pertama di dunia sepenuhnya menjadi undang-undang, serta acara tempat arus kesepakatan (deal flow) Eropa terjadi.
Konvensi Blockchain Eropa Kembali ke Barcelona untuk Pertemuan Pasca-MiCA Pertama di Eropa
Konvensi Blockchain Eropa Kembali ke Barcelona untuk Pertemuan Pasca-MiCA Pertama di Eropa
EBC12 menghadirkan pembicara dari J.P. Morgan, Financial Conduct Authority, Invesco, Coinbase, Fidelity International, dan lebih dari 300 pemimpin dari bank, regulator, dan manajer aset yang membentuk pasar aset digital Eropa.
Barcelona, Spanyol, Juli, 2026 — Sebelas minggu setelah tenggat waktu Peraturan Pasar Kripto Uni Eropa (MiCA), edisi ke-12 Konvensi Blockchain Eropa (EBC12) kembali ke Barcelona pada momen penting bagi industri. Ini adalah pertemuan institusional besar pertama di kawasan ini sejak regulasi aset digital lintas negara yang komprehensif pertama di dunia sepenuhnya menjadi undang-undang, serta acara tempat arus kesepakatan (deal flow) Eropa terjadi.
EBC12 menghadirkan pembicara dari J.P. Morgan, Financial Conduct Authority, Invesco, Coinbase, Fidelity International, dan lebih dari 300 pemimpin dari bank, regulator, dan manajer aset yang membentuk pasar aset digital Eropa.
Barcelona, Spanyol, Juli, 2026 — Sebelas minggu setelah tenggat waktu Peraturan Pasar Kripto Uni Eropa (MiCA), edisi ke-12 Konvensi Blockchain Eropa (EBC12) kembali ke Barcelona pada momen penting bagi industri. Ini adalah pertemuan institusional besar pertama di kawasan ini sejak regulasi aset digital lintas negara yang komprehensif pertama di dunia sepenuhnya menjadi undang-undang, serta acara tempat arus kesepakatan (deal flow) Eropa terjadi.
COINUS-2,09%
80
Artikel
CEO Binance Richard Teng: 70% Pengguna UE Memilih Self-Custody Ketimbang Platform Berlisensi MiCAPeraturan Markets in Crypto-Assets Uni Eropa yang sangat dinantikan, yang dirancang untuk melindungi konsumen melalui lisensi dan pengawasan yang wajib, justru tampaknya menghasilkan efek yang berlawanan. Berdasarkan pengungkapan oleh Wakil CEO Binance Richard Teng pada konferensi Reuters NEXT Asia di Singapura, rezim penegakan yang ketat secara tidak sengaja telah mengarahkan pengguna kripto menjauh dari bursa yang teregulasi dan menuju solusi self-custody terdesentralisasi yang beroperasi sepenuhnya di luar jangkauan regulasi.
Teng mengungkapkan bahwa di antara pengguna berbasis UE yang dipaksa menarik aset dari Binance setelah perusahaan tersebut pada 24 Juni menarik aplikasi MiCA-nya, tujuh dari sepuluh memilih memindahkan kepemilikan mereka ke wallet yang di-host sendiri alih-alih beralih ke kompetitor yang beroperasi dengan otorisasi MiCA. Hanya tiga dari sepuluh yang memindahkan dana ke platform berlisensi. Temuan ini menantang asumsi dasar yang mendasari rancangan MiCA: bahwa tekanan regulasi akan memusatkan aktivitas ke tempat yang diawasi dan patuh.
CEO Binance Richard Teng: 70% Pengguna UE Memilih Self-Custody Ketimbang Platform Berlisensi MiCA
Peraturan Markets in Crypto-Assets Uni Eropa yang sangat dinantikan, yang dirancang untuk melindungi konsumen melalui lisensi dan pengawasan yang wajib, justru tampaknya menghasilkan efek yang berlawanan. Berdasarkan pengungkapan oleh Wakil CEO Binance Richard Teng pada konferensi Reuters NEXT Asia di Singapura, rezim penegakan yang ketat secara tidak sengaja telah mengarahkan pengguna kripto menjauh dari bursa yang teregulasi dan menuju solusi self-custody terdesentralisasi yang beroperasi sepenuhnya di luar jangkauan regulasi.
Teng mengungkapkan bahwa di antara pengguna berbasis UE yang dipaksa menarik aset dari Binance setelah perusahaan tersebut pada 24 Juni menarik aplikasi MiCA-nya, tujuh dari sepuluh memilih memindahkan kepemilikan mereka ke wallet yang di-host sendiri alih-alih beralih ke kompetitor yang beroperasi dengan otorisasi MiCA. Hanya tiga dari sepuluh yang memindahkan dana ke platform berlisensi. Temuan ini menantang asumsi dasar yang mendasari rancangan MiCA: bahwa tekanan regulasi akan memusatkan aktivitas ke tempat yang diawasi dan patuh.
Teng mengungkapkan bahwa di antara pengguna berbasis UE yang dipaksa menarik aset dari Binance setelah perusahaan tersebut pada 24 Juni menarik aplikasi MiCA-nya, tujuh dari sepuluh memilih memindahkan kepemilikan mereka ke wallet yang di-host sendiri alih-alih beralih ke kompetitor yang beroperasi dengan otorisasi MiCA. Hanya tiga dari sepuluh yang memindahkan dana ke platform berlisensi. Temuan ini menantang asumsi dasar yang mendasari rancangan MiCA: bahwa tekanan regulasi akan memusatkan aktivitas ke tempat yang diawasi dan patuh.
96
CEO Binance Richard Teng: 70% Pengguna UE Memilih Self-Custody Daripada Platform Berlisensi MiCAPeraturan yang sangat dinantikan dari Uni Eropa tentang Markets in Crypto-Assets, yang dirancang untuk melindungi konsumen melalui lisensi dan pengawasan yang wajib, tampaknya justru menghasilkan efek sebaliknya. Berdasarkan pengungkapan oleh co-CEO Binance, Richard Teng, dalam acara Reuters NEXT Asia di Singapura, rezim penegakan yang ketat secara tidak sengaja telah mengarahkan pengguna mata uang kripto menjauh dari bursa yang teregulasi dan menuju solusi penyimpanan mandiri yang terdesentralisasi, yang beroperasi sepenuhnya di luar jangkauan regulasi.
Teng mengungkapkan bahwa di antara pengguna berbasis di UE yang dipaksa menarik aset dari Binance setelah perusahaan tersebut pada 24 Juni menarik aplikasi MiCA-nya, tujuh dari sepuluh memilih memindahkan kepemilikan mereka ke dompet yang di-host sendiri, bukan bermigrasi ke kompetitor yang beroperasi dengan otorisasi MiCA. Hanya tiga dari sepuluh yang memindahkan dana ke platform berlisensi. Temuan ini menantang asumsi dasar yang mendasari rancangan MiCA: bahwa tekanan regulasi akan mengonsolidasikan aktivitas ke tempat yang diawasi dan patuh.
CEO Binance Richard Teng: 70% Pengguna UE Memilih Self-Custody Daripada Platform Berlisensi MiCA
Peraturan yang sangat dinantikan dari Uni Eropa tentang Markets in Crypto-Assets, yang dirancang untuk melindungi konsumen melalui lisensi dan pengawasan yang wajib, tampaknya justru menghasilkan efek sebaliknya. Berdasarkan pengungkapan oleh co-CEO Binance, Richard Teng, dalam acara Reuters NEXT Asia di Singapura, rezim penegakan yang ketat secara tidak sengaja telah mengarahkan pengguna mata uang kripto menjauh dari bursa yang teregulasi dan menuju solusi penyimpanan mandiri yang terdesentralisasi, yang beroperasi sepenuhnya di luar jangkauan regulasi.
Teng mengungkapkan bahwa di antara pengguna berbasis di UE yang dipaksa menarik aset dari Binance setelah perusahaan tersebut pada 24 Juni menarik aplikasi MiCA-nya, tujuh dari sepuluh memilih memindahkan kepemilikan mereka ke dompet yang di-host sendiri, bukan bermigrasi ke kompetitor yang beroperasi dengan otorisasi MiCA. Hanya tiga dari sepuluh yang memindahkan dana ke platform berlisensi. Temuan ini menantang asumsi dasar yang mendasari rancangan MiCA: bahwa tekanan regulasi akan mengonsolidasikan aktivitas ke tempat yang diawasi dan patuh.
Teng mengungkapkan bahwa di antara pengguna berbasis di UE yang dipaksa menarik aset dari Binance setelah perusahaan tersebut pada 24 Juni menarik aplikasi MiCA-nya, tujuh dari sepuluh memilih memindahkan kepemilikan mereka ke dompet yang di-host sendiri, bukan bermigrasi ke kompetitor yang beroperasi dengan otorisasi MiCA. Hanya tiga dari sepuluh yang memindahkan dana ke platform berlisensi. Temuan ini menantang asumsi dasar yang mendasari rancangan MiCA: bahwa tekanan regulasi akan mengonsolidasikan aktivitas ke tempat yang diawasi dan patuh.
358
Artikel
Alexander Gerchik: “Saya Belum Melihat Sinyal-Sinyal yang Secara Fundamental Buruk di Pasar Saham. Tapi Kripto..."Wawancara hari ini bersama Alexander Gerchik, salah satu trader paling terkenal di ruang berbahasa Rusia. Ia berawal dari menjadi pengemudi taksi di New York hingga menjadi seorang miliarder, menjadi trader publik pertama di pasar berbahasa Rusia, dan wawancaranya telah menerima jutaan penonton. Hari ini, Gerchik secara terbuka membagikan trading-nya dan menjalankan kanal Telegram untuk para trader.
Kami membahas kondisi pasar saham AS, kemungkinan koreksi, peran dana pensiun dan hedge fund, prospek suku bunga AS, serta dampak kebijakan Trump. Fokus terpisah adalah pasar kripto: apa yang terjadi dengan Bitcoin, mengapa Gerchik khawatir dengan strategi MicroStrategy, apakah Michael Saylor bisa “bertahan” menghadapi penurunan, dan skenario BTC mana yang menurutnya lebih mungkin.
Alexander Gerchik: “Saya Belum Melihat Sinyal-Sinyal yang Secara Fundamental Buruk di Pasar Saham. Tapi Kripto..."
Wawancara hari ini bersama Alexander Gerchik, salah satu trader paling terkenal di ruang berbahasa Rusia. Ia berawal dari menjadi pengemudi taksi di New York hingga menjadi seorang miliarder, menjadi trader publik pertama di pasar berbahasa Rusia, dan wawancaranya telah menerima jutaan penonton. Hari ini, Gerchik secara terbuka membagikan trading-nya dan menjalankan kanal Telegram untuk para trader.
Kami membahas kondisi pasar saham AS, kemungkinan koreksi, peran dana pensiun dan hedge fund, prospek suku bunga AS, serta dampak kebijakan Trump. Fokus terpisah adalah pasar kripto: apa yang terjadi dengan Bitcoin, mengapa Gerchik khawatir dengan strategi MicroStrategy, apakah Michael Saylor bisa “bertahan” menghadapi penurunan, dan skenario BTC mana yang menurutnya lebih mungkin.
Kami membahas kondisi pasar saham AS, kemungkinan koreksi, peran dana pensiun dan hedge fund, prospek suku bunga AS, serta dampak kebijakan Trump. Fokus terpisah adalah pasar kripto: apa yang terjadi dengan Bitcoin, mengapa Gerchik khawatir dengan strategi MicroStrategy, apakah Michael Saylor bisa “bertahan” menghadapi penurunan, dan skenario BTC mana yang menurutnya lebih mungkin.
58
Alexander Gerchik: “Saya belum melihat ada sinyal yang secara fundamental buruk di pasar saham. Tapi kripto...Wawancara hari ini bersama Alexander Gerchik, salah satu trader paling terkenal di kalangan berbahasa Rusia. Ia berawal dari menjadi pengemudi taksi di New York hingga menjadi seorang multimiliuner, menjadi trader publik pertama di pasar berbahasa Rusia, dan wawancaranya telah ditonton jutaan kali. Hari ini, Gerchik secara terbuka membagikan trading-nya dan menjalankan kanal Telegram untuk para trader.
Kami membahas kondisi pasar saham AS, kemungkinan koreksi, peran uang pensiun dan dana lindung nilai, prospek suku bunga AS, serta dampak kebijakan Trump. Fokus terpisah adalah pasar kripto: apa yang sedang terjadi dengan Bitcoin, mengapa Gerchik khawatir tentang strategi MicroStrategy, apakah Michael Saylor bisa “bertahan” menghadapi penurunan, dan skenario BTC mana yang menurutnya lebih mungkin.
Alexander Gerchik: “Saya belum melihat ada sinyal yang secara fundamental buruk di pasar saham. Tapi kripto...
Wawancara hari ini bersama Alexander Gerchik, salah satu trader paling terkenal di kalangan berbahasa Rusia. Ia berawal dari menjadi pengemudi taksi di New York hingga menjadi seorang multimiliuner, menjadi trader publik pertama di pasar berbahasa Rusia, dan wawancaranya telah ditonton jutaan kali. Hari ini, Gerchik secara terbuka membagikan trading-nya dan menjalankan kanal Telegram untuk para trader.
Kami membahas kondisi pasar saham AS, kemungkinan koreksi, peran uang pensiun dan dana lindung nilai, prospek suku bunga AS, serta dampak kebijakan Trump. Fokus terpisah adalah pasar kripto: apa yang sedang terjadi dengan Bitcoin, mengapa Gerchik khawatir tentang strategi MicroStrategy, apakah Michael Saylor bisa “bertahan” menghadapi penurunan, dan skenario BTC mana yang menurutnya lebih mungkin.
Kami membahas kondisi pasar saham AS, kemungkinan koreksi, peran uang pensiun dan dana lindung nilai, prospek suku bunga AS, serta dampak kebijakan Trump. Fokus terpisah adalah pasar kripto: apa yang sedang terjadi dengan Bitcoin, mengapa Gerchik khawatir tentang strategi MicroStrategy, apakah Michael Saylor bisa “bertahan” menghadapi penurunan, dan skenario BTC mana yang menurutnya lebih mungkin.
133
PROFX MEDIA MENGUMUMKAN PROFX EXPO AFRICA 2026 DI CAPE TOWN, MEMPERSATUKAN PARA PEMIMPIN GLOBAL FOREX & FINTECHPROFX MEDIA MENGUMUMKAN PROFX EXPO AFRICA 2026 DI KOTA CAPE TOWN, MEMPERSATUKAN PARA PEMIMPIN GLOBAL FOREX & FINTECH
Kota Cape Town, Afrika Selatan – 20–21 Agustus 2026
ProFX Media dengan bangga mengumumkan PROFX Expo Africa 2026 yang akan datang, sebuah pameran industri keuangan internasional yang dijadwalkan berlangsung pada 20–21 Agustus 2026 di Kota Cape Town, Afrika Selatan.
Acara ini akan mempertemukan para profesional terkemuka, organisasi, dan pengambil keputusan dari seluruh ekosistem keuangan global, termasuk broker Forex, perusahaan FinTech, penyedia likuiditas, perusahaan solusi pembayaran, inovator blockchain, dan investor institusional.
PROFX MEDIA MENGUMUMKAN PROFX EXPO AFRICA 2026 DI CAPE TOWN, MEMPERSATUKAN PARA PEMIMPIN GLOBAL FOREX & FINTECH
PROFX MEDIA MENGUMUMKAN PROFX EXPO AFRICA 2026 DI KOTA CAPE TOWN, MEMPERSATUKAN PARA PEMIMPIN GLOBAL FOREX & FINTECH
Kota Cape Town, Afrika Selatan – 20–21 Agustus 2026
ProFX Media dengan bangga mengumumkan PROFX Expo Africa 2026 yang akan datang, sebuah pameran industri keuangan internasional yang dijadwalkan berlangsung pada 20–21 Agustus 2026 di Kota Cape Town, Afrika Selatan.
Acara ini akan mempertemukan para profesional terkemuka, organisasi, dan pengambil keputusan dari seluruh ekosistem keuangan global, termasuk broker Forex, perusahaan FinTech, penyedia likuiditas, perusahaan solusi pembayaran, inovator blockchain, dan investor institusional.
Kota Cape Town, Afrika Selatan – 20–21 Agustus 2026
ProFX Media dengan bangga mengumumkan PROFX Expo Africa 2026 yang akan datang, sebuah pameran industri keuangan internasional yang dijadwalkan berlangsung pada 20–21 Agustus 2026 di Kota Cape Town, Afrika Selatan.
Acara ini akan mempertemukan para profesional terkemuka, organisasi, dan pengambil keputusan dari seluruh ekosistem keuangan global, termasuk broker Forex, perusahaan FinTech, penyedia likuiditas, perusahaan solusi pembayaran, inovator blockchain, dan investor institusional.
74
Artikel
PROFX MEDIA MENGUMUMKAN PROFX EXPO AFRICA 2026 DI KAPETOWN, MEMPERSATUKAN PEMIMPIN FOREX & FINTECH GLOBALPROFX MEDIA MENGUMUMKAN PROFX EXPO AFRICA 2026 DI KAP TOWN, MEMPERSATUKAN PEMIMPIN FOREX & FINTECH GLOBAL
Cape Town, Afrika Selatan – 20–21 Agustus 2026
ProFX Media dengan bangga mengumumkan rangkaian acara PROFX Expo Africa 2026, sebuah pameran industri keuangan internasional yang dijadwalkan berlangsung pada 20–21 Agustus 2026 di Cape Town, Afrika Selatan.
Acara ini akan mempertemukan para profesional terkemuka, organisasi, dan pengambil keputusan dari seluruh ekosistem keuangan global, termasuk pialang Forex, perusahaan FinTech, penyedia likuiditas, perusahaan solusi pembayaran, inovator blockchain, serta investor institusional.
PROFX MEDIA MENGUMUMKAN PROFX EXPO AFRICA 2026 DI KAPETOWN, MEMPERSATUKAN PEMIMPIN FOREX & FINTECH GLOBAL
PROFX MEDIA MENGUMUMKAN PROFX EXPO AFRICA 2026 DI KAP TOWN, MEMPERSATUKAN PEMIMPIN FOREX & FINTECH GLOBAL
Cape Town, Afrika Selatan – 20–21 Agustus 2026
ProFX Media dengan bangga mengumumkan rangkaian acara PROFX Expo Africa 2026, sebuah pameran industri keuangan internasional yang dijadwalkan berlangsung pada 20–21 Agustus 2026 di Cape Town, Afrika Selatan.
Acara ini akan mempertemukan para profesional terkemuka, organisasi, dan pengambil keputusan dari seluruh ekosistem keuangan global, termasuk pialang Forex, perusahaan FinTech, penyedia likuiditas, perusahaan solusi pembayaran, inovator blockchain, serta investor institusional.
Cape Town, Afrika Selatan – 20–21 Agustus 2026
ProFX Media dengan bangga mengumumkan rangkaian acara PROFX Expo Africa 2026, sebuah pameran industri keuangan internasional yang dijadwalkan berlangsung pada 20–21 Agustus 2026 di Cape Town, Afrika Selatan.
Acara ini akan mempertemukan para profesional terkemuka, organisasi, dan pengambil keputusan dari seluruh ekosistem keuangan global, termasuk pialang Forex, perusahaan FinTech, penyedia likuiditas, perusahaan solusi pembayaran, inovator blockchain, serta investor institusional.
110
Masuk untuk menjelajahi konten lainnya
Bergabunglah dengan pengguna kripto global di Binance Square
⚡️ Dapatkan informasi terbaru dan berguna tentang kripto.
💬 Dipercayai oleh bursa kripto terbesar di dunia.
👍 Temukan wawasan nyata dari kreator terverifikasi.
Email/Nomor Ponsel
Topik Sedang Tren
VIXSurges12%
3,960 penayangan
176 Berdiskusi
📉 Lonjakan indeks Fear (VIX) sebesar 12%.. Apakah pasar memasuki fase volatilitas baru?
Indeks volatilitas (VIX), yang dikenal sebagai "Indeks Ketakutan", mengalami kenaikan lebih dari 12%, sebuah sinyal yang jelas bahwa kehati-hatian di kalangan investor meningkat serta permintaan terhadap instrumen lindung nilai ikut naik.
Lonjakan seperti ini biasanya mencerminkan meningkatnya kekhawatiran terhadap data ekonomi, ketegangan geopolitik, atau ekspektasi kebijakan moneter—yang mendorong investor untuk mengurangi paparan pada aset berisiko tinggi. Dalam situasi seperti ini, pasar saham maupun mata uang digital bisa mengalami volatilitas tajam dan meningkatnya frekuensi aksi ambil untung.
Namun, kenaikan VIX bukanlah sinyal penurunan yang pasti, melainkan mencerminkan meningkatnya volatilitas dan ketidakpastian. Periode-periode ini sering menjadi peluang bagi investor yang mengandalkan manajemen modal yang disiplin dan rencana trading yang jelas, alih-alih mengambil keputusan berdasarkan rasa takut atau emosi.
Pesan paling penting: ketika indeks ketakutan naik, pengelolaan risiko dan disiplin dalam trading menjadi lebih penting daripada mengejar keuntungan cepat.
#VIXSurges12%
yosreia
·Disukai 1 Kali
·90 penayangan
IranianCrudeTops$80
5,824 penayangan
127 Berdiskusi
MissilesHitJaskPowerAndDesalinationFacilities
28,628 penayangan
597 Berdiskusi