Crypto Breaking

FlightAware, the aviation data company behind real-time flight tracking and status updates, has sued Kalshi in New York federal court over Kalshi’s use of FlightAware’s “data and name” to power prediction market contracts tied to flight cancellations. The complaint, filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York on Monday, accuses Kalshi of continuing to list event contracts using FlightAware’s registered trademark and purportedly “verified” flight-cancellation information despite repeated demands to stop.
The lawsuit adds a reputational and safety dimension to the broader legal battle already surrounding prediction markets in the US. FlightAware argues that wagering tied to flight disruptions could create incentives for manipulation and even interfere with air travel, while also positioning FlightAware as being involved in alleged “illicit” activity through unauthorized branding and data use.
Key takeaways
FlightAware sued Kalshi in New York federal court, alleging continued use of FlightAware’s trademark and flight-cancellation data in prediction market contracts.
The complaint frames flight events as safety-relevant, arguing wagers could incentivize participants to interfere with cancellations or pressure aviation workers to cut corners.
Regulatory pressure on prediction markets is escalating, with states and federal regulators already contesting whether event contracts function as illegal gambling.
FlightAware says customers may assume involvement due to the way Kalshi presents “verified by FlightAware” information and FlightAware branding.
Trademark and data-use claims put FlightAware at the center
According to the Monday filing in the Southern District of New York, FlightAware contends that Kalshi kept publishing event contracts related to flight cancellations even after FlightAware demanded Kalshi stop using its registered trademark. FlightAware also claims Kalshi continued to advertise those markets as being “verified by FlightAware’s data,” effectively tying FlightAware’s brand and information to the trading activity.
FlightAware’s lawsuit asserts multiple legal theories, including trademark infringement, breach of contract, harm to its reputation, and unfair competition. The company characterizes the expansion of Kalshi’s trading into commercial flight operations—reported as starting in July—as amplifying the reputational stakes of unauthorized association.
“[T]here was widespread outrage and concern that the markets would incentivize unsafe tactics to impact cancellations, threatening public safety and creating the potential for massive disruption of air travel. Airlines condemned the markets,” said the lawsuit. “And due to Kalshi’s unauthorized use of FlightAware’s data and mark, customers immediately assumed that FlightAware was involved in the scheme.”
The complaint describes FlightAware’s requested remedy as preventing “harm to public safety” before any alleged damage grows—an argument that goes beyond branding disputes and into how flight-event markets might influence behavior.
Why flight-cancellation markets are central to the safety argument
While the lawsuit is anchored in trademark infringement and related business claims, it also makes a broader case that some prediction market structures can distort incentives—especially when participants may have information before it becomes public.
FlightAware’s filing points to concerns about manipulation in event contracts generally—particularly cases where traders might know more than the public until an event is formally disclosed. The filing references public reporting that has highlighted unusual betting activity in other contexts, including claims tied to political speech wording and allegations involving alleged nonpublic information.
On flight disruptions specifically, FlightAware argues Kalshi’s model risks creating incentives to affect outcomes that are operationally complex and safety-sensitive. In its complaint, FlightAware contends that:
“A market that allows the public to wager on whether flights will be delayed or cancelled creates an incentive for participants to interfere with air travel—including by causing or contributing to flight cancellations—to profit from their wagers.“
“Worse, wagers on flights being timely may incentivize airline, airport, or other aviation workers to cut corners to keep a flight on time.“
The practical implication for investors and users of prediction markets is that the debate is not only about legality; it’s also about whether these markets create behavioral pressures that regulators and consumers should treat differently from, say, entertainment-focused or purely informational forecasts.
Prediction markets face a wider legal showdown in the US
FlightAware’s suit arrives amid intensifying legal scrutiny of prediction markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket. The company’s complaint is described as another step in a pattern of court challenges where gaming authorities have asked judges to halt or block event contracts for residents in their states.
Earlier coverage cited in the source notes that Michigan has sought to block Kalshi’s sports betting contracts. More broadly, the continuing legal conflict is expected to develop into a standoff between federal regulators and state officials over whether certain prediction markets amount to illegal gambling under state law, with attention often focused on sports-betting-adjacent products.
Within that landscape, FlightAware’s complaint is notable for targeting the infrastructure behind a specific market type: the data feeds and branding used to connect aviation status information to tradable events. Even if a court ultimately decides the “wager” question in a different frame, the trademark and reputational claims could still materially affect how prediction markets partner with, or reference, data providers.
Market dominance and scale add pressure
The source also points to a report from Predicted’s “State of Prediction Markets – Q2 2026,” which says Kalshi and Polymarket combined controlled more than 90% of all prediction market volume, and together had more than $90 billion in second-quarter notional volume. While this figure is not part of FlightAware’s lawsuit, it helps explain why disputes involving major platforms and data sources attract immediate attention: the potential impact of any court outcome is amplified by the scale at which these venues operate.
At the same time, scale can cut both ways. For data providers and industry stakeholders, widely used prediction products increase the cost of getting the compliance picture wrong—especially when branding and “verified” claims link a company’s name to markets that may be perceived as encouraging unsafe interference or manipulation.
Cointelegraph reported that it reached out to Kalshi for comment on the lawsuit but did not receive an immediate response.
Readers should watch how courts address both strands of this conflict—whether event contracts are treated as wagers under relevant laws, and whether unauthorized trademark and data-use claims can force changes to how prediction platforms source and present verified information. The next developments in the case could determine how far prediction markets can go in partnering with real-world data providers without triggering safety and compliance concerns.
This article was originally published as FlightAware Sues Kalshi Over Use of Flight Cancellation Data on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

eToro has outlined a new step in its push to broaden beyond crypto by announcing plans to acquire US online brokerage TradeZero. The deal is positioned as part of the company’s expansion strategy in the United States, with closing expected in the first half of 2026.
In parallel with the acquisition announcement, eToro’s second-quarter update showed crypto trading and revenues under pressure. The company reported $1.59 billion in total revenue for the quarter, with crypto assets contributing $1.34 billion—down roughly 30% from $1.9 billion in the prior-year comparable quarter. While crypto revenue fell, eToro also reported $1.35 billion in crypto-related cost of revenue and $19.7 million in net income from crypto assets, alongside $53.4 million in total net income.
Key takeaways
eToro plans to acquire TradeZero to accelerate its US expansion, targeting closing in the first half of 2026.
In Q2, crypto remained the largest revenue stream for eToro at $1.34 billion, but it fell about 30% year over year.
Crypto net income was positive at $19.7 million for the quarter, even as overall crypto trades and invested amounts declined sharply in July.
The company reported strong cross-asset engagement: many users who traded commodities later traded equities and then crypto on eToro.
TradeZero reportedly generated about $80 million in revenue over the last 12 months ended June 30, 2026, with 81% gross margins.
Why eToro wants TradeZero in its US strategy
The acquisition of TradeZero is framed by eToro as a practical move to become a broader multi-asset platform in the United States. The focus on US brokerage capabilities comes as the firm works to deepen trading relationships across asset classes, rather than relying solely on digital-asset activity.
eToro also previously signaled similar intent in crypto infrastructure: in April, it announced plans to acquire self-custodial wallet provider Zengo. Taken together, the company’s approach appears to combine more traditional brokerage reach (through TradeZero) with continuing investment in crypto custody and user access (through Zengo).
Crypto performance remains the swing factor
Despite the company’s ongoing multi-asset push, crypto continues to dominate the revenue mix. In its second-quarter report, eToro said total revenue came in at $1.59 billion, down from $2 billion in the comparable 2025 period. Of that amount, $1.34 billion was revenue from crypto assets, which the company said was about 30% lower than $1.9 billion in Q2 2025.
eToro reported $1.35 billion in crypto-related cost of revenue and $19.7 million in net income from crypto assets. Total net income for the quarter was $53.4 million, indicating that losses or reductions in crypto activity did not fully translate into an overall earnings collapse—though the numbers highlight how sensitive the business remains to the direction of crypto volumes and fees.
The broader trading picture also weakened after the quarter. According to eToro’s disclosures, total cryptocurrency trades on the platform fell to 1.4 million in July, representing a 73% year-on-year decline. The invested amount was down 50% over the same period, reinforcing that reduced trading activity has been affecting both the number of transactions and the size of positions.
Cross-asset engagement and the commodities-to-crypto funnel
Alongside crypto-specific declines, eToro highlighted user behavior that could support its multi-asset thesis. In commentary attributed to its financial leadership, the company said that more than 60% of users who traded commodities during Q4 2025 to Q1 2026 later traded equities in Q2 2026. It added that nearly nine in ten of those users have also traded crypto on eToro.
This matters because it suggests eToro is attempting to build a funnel where initial engagement in one asset category can lead to additional trading across other categories. If TradeZero helps expand access to US equities and other traditional brokerage products, eToro may be betting that increased equity trading will feed back into crypto usage—offsetting parts of the volatility in digital-asset demand.
eToro also reported that equities and commodities-related trading generated $141 million in net income for the platform, providing another anchor outside crypto revenue even as crypto volumes cooled.
Deal economics: TradeZero’s margins and expected earnings impact
From the perspective of deal structure, eToro provided figures intended to show that TradeZero could strengthen the business rather than dilute it. The company stated that TradeZero generated about $80 million of revenue with 81% gross margins in the last 12 months ended June 30, 2026.
Looking ahead, eToro said it expects the acquisition to be accretive to adjusted earnings per share in the first year after closing. Closing is expected in the first half of 2026, meaning the earliest period for the claimed benefit would likely follow shortly thereafter.
Market reaction to the announcement appeared cautious. eToro’s Nasdaq-traded shares were down more than 5% in pre-market activity on Tuesday, with the move expected to extend Monday’s decline according to Yahoo Finance data for ETOR.
What to watch next
Investors and users will likely focus on whether the TradeZero acquisition helps stabilize revenues as crypto volumes fluctuate, and on whether eToro can translate its reported cross-asset engagement into sustained trading activity in the US. In the meantime, July’s sharp drop in crypto trades and invested amounts remains a key signal for how quickly digital-asset performance can change the company’s quarterly outlook.
This article was originally published as eToro Plans to Acquire TradeZero as Q2 Crypto Revenue Drops 30% on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

A Dubai-based maritime tokenization platform, Shipfinex, has teamed up with Abu Dhabi blockchain network ADI Chain to test how vessel-linked assets could be represented and financed on-chain. The partners say they are tokenizing a pipeline of roughly 35 vessels valued at about $500 million, aiming to create additional funding options for shipowners.
The concept centers on placing the vessels into separate special-purpose vehicles (SPVs). Tokens would then be issued to reflect economic exposure to each ship—potentially structured as vessel-backed credit, charter-related income, or other rights tied to the underlying assets. ADI Chain is expected to handle the distribution and settlement layer, with primary allocations and distributions planned to use stablecoins denominated in UAE dirham, US dollars, and other currencies.
Key takeaways
Shipfinex and ADI Chain are piloting tokenization of a vessel pipeline worth about $500 million across around 35 ships.
The structure uses separate SPVs per vessel, with tokens representing ship-specific economic interests such as credit or charter income.
ADI Chain will provide the stablecoin-oriented distribution and settlement infrastructure for the pilot.
The project is still in an operational readiness stage, with no Maritime Asset Tokens publicly issued yet and the regulated issuance route still being finalized.
The announcement aligns with broader growth forecasts for tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), including Standard Chartered’s estimate that the sector could reach $4 trillion by end-2028.
How the pilot is structured: SPVs and ship-linked tokens
Tokenizing shipping assets is notoriously complex, largely because the industry is fragmented and ship-level cash flows can vary widely depending on charter terms, routes, and financing arrangements. Shipfinex’s approach, as described in the announcement, attempts to translate that complexity into a modular on-chain wrapper: each vessel is moved into its own SPV, and tokens are intended to map to the economics of that specific vehicle.
That could matter for investors and lenders because it potentially enables more granular exposure than traditional fund structures—at least in theory—letting market participants choose how they want to participate in a given ship’s revenue stream or credit profile. The partners have also framed the tokens as potentially representing vessel-backed credit, charter-linked income, or other interests, suggesting room for multiple payoff designs depending on the underlying deal economics.
Stablecoin settlement: why ADI Chain’s role matters
ADI Chain, based in Abu Dhabi, is described as the partner providing distribution and settlement infrastructure. The planned use of currency-denominated stablecoins—specifically UAE dirham- and US dollar-linked assets, plus additional denominations—signals that the settlement model is being built to reduce friction in cross-currency payments, which is a common challenge in international shipping finance.
For market participants, stablecoin settlement can also influence how quickly transactions clear and how tokenized positions can be serviced operationally. Even so, the project’s success will likely depend on the operational details of issuance, custody, and investor onboarding, especially given the regulatory process the partners say remains unfinished.
Still in a pilot: issuance route not finalized
While the partnership outlines a significant vessel pipeline, it is important that the project is not yet live in terms of publicly issued tokens. The arrangement is described as being in a pilot and operational-readiness phase. The partners state that Maritime Asset Tokens have not been publicly issued and that the regulated issuance pathway is still being finalized.
This staging matters because tokenization efforts in RWAs can fail at different points: legal structuring, regulatory approvals, or the practical ability to support ongoing distributions and compliance. By highlighting that the regulated issuance route is still under development, Shipfinex and ADI Chain appear to be treating the first phase as a test of readiness rather than an immediate launch of investable tokens.
Investors watching similar initiatives may therefore want to track what changes next—particularly whether the pilot culminates in a formally approved issuance structure, and how ongoing payments tied to charter activity or credit terms are operationalized.
RWA tokenization momentum: from shipping to broader forecasts
The shipping pilot comes as tokenized RWAs continue to attract attention across traditional finance and crypto-native infrastructure. RWA.xyz data cited in the report indicates that assets tracked on its platform totaled about $38.1 billion as of Aug. 9. Within that figure, US Treasury debt accounts for roughly $16.2 billion and commodities about $4.9 billion.
Standard Chartered’s outlook also points to continued expansion. In a report released Monday, the bank forecast that tokenized RWAs could reach $4 trillion by the end of 2028, according to Geoff Kendrick, the global head of digital asset research at the bank. The scale of that projection suggests that the market is expected to grow beyond early niches—though it also underlines the difference between long-term forecasts and near-term, pilot-stage delivery.
In shipping specifically, the scale remains small relative to the total addressable market. The announcement cites Clarksons Research data valuing the world fleet and orderbook at about $2.1 trillion at the start of 2026. Compared with that estimate, the $500 million vessel pipeline represents a limited slice—meaning this pilot is likely best viewed as a proof-of-process and market test rather than a near-term transformation of shipping finance.
Still, even incremental moves can be significant in RWAs if they demonstrate repeatable mechanics: asset segregation, token-to-cashflow mapping, stablecoin-based settlement, and the ability to maintain compliance over time. That is precisely where pilots tend to earn or lose momentum.
For readers, the key next indicators to watch are whether Shipfinex and ADI Chain progress from operational readiness to a clearly defined regulated issuance route, and how they handle the practicalities of ongoing distributions tied to ship-level economics—especially once any tokens transition from closed testing to broader market participation.
This article was originally published as ADI Chain and Shipfinex Partner to Tokenize $500M Vessel Pipeline on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

SharpLink, one of the largest corporate treasuries focused on Ether, reported a significantly wider loss for the second quarter of 2026 as ETH’s price decline weighed on its balance sheet. The Miami, Florida-based firm posted a net loss of $394 million, compared with a $103 million net loss in the same quarter of the prior year.
In the company’s Monday announcement, SharpLink attributed the bulk of the loss to $321 million in unrealized crypto losses and $76 million in impairments related to staked Ether tokens. At the same time, the firm generated $11.5 million in revenue, including $11.1 million from ETH staking.
Key takeaways
SharpLink’s Q2 2026 net loss widened to $394 million, driven largely by $321 million in unrealized crypto losses.
Impairments tied to staked Ether amounted to $76 million, adding pressure beyond mark-to-market declines.
Revenue remained positive at $11.5 million, with staking contributing $11.1 million.
Cash and cash equivalents rose to $56 million from $28 million as of December 2025.
Unrealized losses dominate SharpLink’s quarter
SharpLink’s financial results underscore how sensitive large Ether treasuries are to ETH’s spot price and to accounting treatment for staked derivatives. The firm reported that its Q2 2026 loss included $321 million in unrealized crypto losses, reflecting changes in the valuation of its Ether exposure rather than realized selling losses.
That valuation pressure aligned with broader market conditions. Ether fell by around 23% during the second quarter of 2026, according to CoinMarketCap. While staking produced income, the scale of the unrealized mark-downs appears to have overwhelmed that support.
Staking income and staked-token impairments
SharpLink generated $11.5 million in revenue in the quarter, including $11.1 million from ETH staking, according to the company’s Monday announcement. For Ether-focused treasury strategies, staking can partially offset volatility by adding cash-flow-like yield.
However, SharpLink also recorded $76 million in impairments on staked Ether (ETH) tokens. This detail matters for investors because it suggests that performance isn’t determined solely by ETH price moves; the accounting and valuation of staked-token instruments can introduce additional losses even when staking revenue is present.
How much Ether SharpLink controls
SharpLink said it holds 632,784 Ether, worth about $1.2 billion, plus an additional 181,321 ETH—worth roughly $343 million—through various liquid staked Ether tokens. Combined, this creates a substantial balance-sheet exposure to Ethereum’s price direction, with liquid staked products carrying their own valuation and impairment dynamics.
SharpLink is currently described as the second-largest Ether treasury company. Based on StrategicEthReserve data cited in the report, Bitmine is the largest corporate Ether holder, holding 5.54 million ETH worth about $9.4 billion. SharpLink’s current holdings are estimated at 863,000 ETH, valued at about $1.46 billion.
Buying ETH after an eight-month pause
SharpLink’s latest results arrive alongside a notable change in its acquisition pattern. Earlier coverage from Cointelegraph noted that the company resumed Ether purchases with a $7.8 million buy in late June after pausing for eight months. A second purchase followed days later, with SharpLink buying 10,000 Ether for about $16 million, as referenced by Cointelegraph.
That kind of buying at lower levels can be a strategic way to extend a treasury’s exposure when assets are discounted. Still, the Q2 financials show that even resumed accumulation doesn’t neutralize accounting losses in the near term when ETH declines sharply across the reporting period.
Treasury liquidity and equity-market reaction
SharpLink reported that its cash and cash equivalents totaled $56 million, up from $28 million in December 2025. Liquidity improvements can be important for corporate treasuries because they provide flexibility for operations and for potential future purchases—especially after a quarter marked by large unrealized and impairment charges.
On the equity side, SharpLink’s stock fell 3.9% on Monday, extending a 30% year-to-date decline, according to Yahoo Finance. For public Ether treasury companies, equity performance can reflect both the market’s view of treasury risk and expectations for how quickly staking yield and future purchases might offset volatility-driven drawdowns.
Going forward, investors should watch two things most closely: whether SharpLink’s staking revenue trend can stabilize amid continued ETH volatility, and how future quarters treat liquid staked token valuations and impairments—particularly if ETH’s price swings produce new mark-to-market pressure.
This article was originally published as SharpLink Posts $394M Q2 Net Loss as ETH Prices Weigh In on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

eToro telah menguraikan langkah baru dalam upayanya untuk memperluas ke dalam pasar keuangan AS: perusahaan tersebut mengatakan pada Selasa bahwa mereka berencana mengakuisisi perusahaan perantara saham online AS, TradeZero. Kesepakatan ini diposisikan sebagai bagian dari upaya eToro yang lebih luas untuk membangun platform multi-aset yang mencakup saham, komoditas, dan aset digital.
Seiring dengan pengumuman akuisisi, pembaruan kuartal kedua eToro menunjukkan adanya volatilitas yang berlanjut dalam bisnis krionya. Perusahaan melaporkan pendapatan sebesar $1,59 miliar untuk kuartal tersebut, turun dari $2 miliar pada periode 2025 yang sebanding. Pendapatan yang terkait dengan aset kripto berjumlah $1,34 miliar—turun sekitar 30% dibanding $1,9 miliar pada Kuartal II 2025—sementara eToro juga melaporkan biaya pendapatan terkait kripto sebesar $1,35 miliar, sehingga menghasilkan pendapatan bersih dari aset kripto sebesar $19,7 juta. Total pendapatan bersih untuk kuartal tersebut adalah $53,4 juta.

Para trader Bitcoin semakin menaruh perhatian pada stablecoin untuk mencari petunjuk tentang ke mana arah selera risiko bergerak. Tinjauan data terbaru dari CryptoQuant menyoroti bahwa nilai pasar Tether untuk USDT menyusut dengan laju yang tidak biasa cepat—namun pola yang sama pada pasar bearish sebelumnya menunjukkan bahwa aksi jual tersebut mungkin sedang mendekati akhir.
Menurut CryptoQuant, perubahan kap pasar USDT bergulir 60 hari rata-rata sekitar minus $4,88 miliar per 10 Agustus, sementara jendela 11 hari terbaru menunjukkan hampir $870 juta pasokan USDT menghilang. Kombinasi ini mengindikasikan adanya penarikan likuiditas yang biasanya menekan kinerja kripto secara lebih luas, tetapi juga selaras dengan perilaku fase akhir dari penurunan-penurunan sebelumnya.

Penyelidik kripto sedang bergelut dengan salah satu masalah alokasi kerugian paling sulit dalam keamanan aset digital: memperkirakan pencurian dari dompet self-custody, di mana tidak ada daftar resmi tentang pengguna yang terdampak. Analisis yang sedang berlangsung terkait peretasan yang terkait Coldcard kini menghasilkan angka yang secara signifikan berbeda, tergantung bagaimana masing-masing tim memperlakukan laporan korban “yang telah dikonfirmasi” dibandingkan atribusi di rantai (on-chain).
Platform analitik blockchain CryptoQuant saat ini memperkirakan kerugian yang telah dikonfirmasi mencapai 1.432 Bitcoin, sementara Galaxy Research dan TRM Labs berpendapat bahwa dampak yang lebih luas lebih tinggi ketika penelusuran menunjukkan adanya korban tambahan di beberapa gelombang. Perbedaan ini menyoroti mengapa eksploitasi pada dompet perangkat keras bisa sulit untuk dikuantifikasi—dan mengapa investor serta pengawas keamanan sebaiknya menganggap setiap angka tunggal sebagai perkiraan sementara.

Perusahaan pembayaran Decta mengatakan bahwa mereka menambahkan USDC milik Circle ke back-end operasi treasury internasionalnya, dengan menggunakan OpenPayd untuk mengonversi fiat menjadi stablecoin untuk penyelesaian internal lintas pasar. Langkah ini menyoroti pola yang kian berkembang dalam kripto: stablecoin semakin digunakan sebagai infrastruktur untuk likuiditas dan transfer operasional, bukan sebagai opsi pembayaran bermerek untuk pelanggan.
Decta mengatakan kepada Cointelegraph bahwa perusahaan tersebut akan menyalurkan dana mereka sendiri melalui infrastruktur teregulasi milik OpenPayd, di mana dana tersebut dikonversi menjadi USDC melalui kemampuan over-the-counter OpenPayd. Selanjutnya, OpenPayd mendukung penyelesaian operasional internasional yang seharusnya dilakukan Decta melalui proses perbankan konvensional.

Mahkamah Agung Korea Selatan telah mengusulkan amandemen terhadap Aturan Eksekusi Perdata yang memungkinkan kreditur untuk membekukan, mengidentifikasi, dan melikuidasi kripto yang dimiliki debitur.
Batas waktu untuk komentar publik atas amandemen yang diusulkan adalah 11 Agustus. Di bawah amandemen baru, bursa cryptocurrency hanya akan memiliki waktu tujuh hari untuk mengungkap kepemilikan pelanggan jika mereka menerima perintah pengadilan.
Aturan Penyitaan Kripto Baru Korea Selatan
Amandemen yang diusulkan terhadap Aturan Eksekusi Perdata menciptakan proses standar bagi kreditur untuk membekukan, mengidentifikasi, dan melikuidasi aset kripto milik debitur. Jika disahkan, aturan tersebut akan mulai berlaku pada 1 Oktober. Setelah disahkan, bursa cryptocurrency akan memiliki jendela waktu tujuh minggu untuk bersiap agar dapat berperan dalam penegakan utang perdata.

Korea Selatan sedang mempersiapkan untuk memperluas aturan kripto “Travel Rule”-nya agar berlaku untuk hampir semua transfer on-chain antara penyedia layanan aset virtual (VASP) yang terdaftar, bukan hanya transaksi di atas nilai tertentu. Perubahan ini menghapus ambang batas saat ini sebesar 1 juta won (sekitar $700), langkah yang ditujukan untuk menutup celah yang jelas: pengguna membagi transfer menjadi potongan-potongan yang lebih kecil agar tetap berada di bawah persyaratan pelaporan dan berbagi informasi.
Menurut keputusan kabinet yang menyetujui amandemen terhadap Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Korea Selatan tentang Pelaporan dan Penggunaan Informasi Transaksi Keuangan Tertentu, aturan yang diperbarui juga akan menambah kewajiban anti pencucian uang (AML) yang lebih ketat terkait transfer yang melibatkan penukaran mata uang asing dan dompet pribadi, di mana otoritas mengatakan bahwa kontrol yang ada telah dieksploitasi.

Proposal SEC Reg Crypto akan menuju rapat terbuka pada 14 Agustus 2026, di mana Komisi Sekuritas dan Bursa AS (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission) akan mempertimbangkan apakah akan menerbitkan aturan yang diusulkan untuk menciptakan rezim penawaran yang disesuaikan bagi kontrak investasi tertentu yang melibatkan aset kripto. Rapat dijadwalkan pukul 10:00 ET. Jika disetujui, rilis yang diusulkan akan memulai proses komentar publik formal begitu dipublikasikan.
SEC Mengatur Jadwal Aset Kripto untuk 14 Agustus
Pemberitahuan Sunshine Act milik SEC pada 10 Agustus mengonfirmasi bahwa Komisi akan mengadakan rapat terbuka pada Jumat, 14 Agustus, pukul 10:00 ET. Rapat akan berlangsung di kantor pusat SEC di Washington, D.C., dan juga akan tersedia melalui webcast lembaga tersebut.

Proposal SEC mengenai regulasi kripto akan dibawa ke rapat terbuka pada 14 Agustus 2026, di mana Komisi Sekuritas dan Bursa AS akan mempertimbangkan apakah akan menerbitkan aturan yang diusulkan untuk menciptakan rezim penawaran yang disesuaikan bagi kontrak investasi tertentu yang melibatkan aset kripto. Rapat dijadwalkan pada pukul 10.00 ET. Jika disetujui, rilis yang diusulkan akan memulai proses komentar publik formal setelah dipublikasikan.
SEC Menjadwalkan Regulasi Aset Kripto untuk 14 Agustus
Pemberitahuan Sunshine Act 10 Agustus dari SEC menegaskan bahwa Komisi akan mengadakan rapat terbuka pada Jumat, 14 Agustus, pukul 10.00 ET. Rapat akan berlangsung di kantor pusat SEC di Washington, D.C., dan juga dapat diakses melalui siaran web (webcast) lembaga tersebut.

Penyedia infrastruktur pembayaran Decta UK mengatakan pihaknya akan memasukkan USDC ke dalam alur kerja treasury internalnya untuk penyelesaian lintas negara—integrasi yang menyoroti bagaimana stablecoin semakin sering digunakan di balik layar, bukan sebagai opsi pembayaran yang ditujukan langsung untuk pelanggan.
Menurut pengumuman yang dibagikan ke Cointelegraph, Decta akan menyalurkan dananya sendiri melalui OpenPayd, penyedia infrastruktur keuangan teregulasi, tempat perusahaan mengonversi fiat menjadi USDC untuk penyelesaian operasional internasional.

Korea Selatan akan memperluas aturan kripto “Travel Rule” sehingga berlaku untuk hampir semua transfer di-chain antara penyedia layanan aset virtual yang teregulasi, sekaligus menghapus ambang nilai yang sebelumnya digunakan. Perubahan ini merupakan bagian dari amandemen yang telah disetujui Kabinet terhadap Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang tentang Pelaporan dan Penggunaan Informasi Transaksi Keuangan Tertentu, yang disetujui pada Selasa oleh pemerintah negara tersebut.
Pembaruan ini dirancang untuk menutup celah yang memungkinkan sebagian pengguna menghindari kepatuhan Travel Rule dengan memecah transaksi menjadi bagian-bagian yang lebih kecil. Seiring dengan perluasan Travel Rule, amandemen tersebut juga memperketat kontrol anti pencucian uang (AML) untuk transfer yang melibatkan bursa luar negeri dan dompet pribadi.

Trump Media mengatakan pihaknya sedang melakukan perombakan cara pengelolaan portofolio aset digital setelah kerugian yang belum direalisasi atas kripto dan sekuritas mendorong perusahaan mengalami rugi bersih sebesar 238 juta dolar pada kuartal kedua. Dalam pembaruan Q2 yang dirilis pada Senin, bisnis di balik Truth Social dan merek layanan keuangan Truth.Fi mengatakan pihaknya berencana melakukan “revamp” terhadap pendekatan bendaharanya yang ditujukan untuk menjaga eksposur kripto jangka panjang sambil mengendalikan volatilitas laporan posisi keuangan dengan lebih baik.
Perusahaan tersebut mengaitkan kerugian yang belum direalisasi sebesar 190,4 juta dolar atas aset digital, aset digital yang dijaminkan, dan sekuritas ekuitas. Perusahaan juga menggambarkan perubahan ini sebagai cara untuk meningkatkan “produktivitas” neraca—sebuah penekanan yang menunjukkan bahwa pihaknya berniat untuk terus menghasilkan imbal hasil dan menyusun manajemen risiko seputar Bitcoin, bukan sekadar menahan eksposur spot tanpa batas.

Trump Media says it will overhaul how it manages its digital-asset treasury after crypto and securities losses contributed to a $238 million net loss in the second quarter. In its Q2 earnings materials, the company attributed $190.4 million in unrealized losses to its mix of digital assets, pledged digital assets, and equity securities, while describing a plan aimed at keeping long-term Bitcoin exposure but reducing balance-sheet volatility.
The publicly traded company—best known as the parent of social platforms Truth Social and Truth+ and the financial services brand Truth.Fi—linked the strategy shift to the need for a more resilient framework. The company noted that the changes are meant to improve the “productivity” of its balance sheet without abandoning its core digital-asset positioning.
Key takeaways
Trump Media reported $238 million net loss in Q2, with $190.4 million tied to unrealized losses across digital assets, pledged digital assets, and equity securities.
A new treasury framework is planned to preserve long-term Bitcoin exposure while managing volatility and improving capital efficiency.
Bitcoin use in hedging and yield activity is already in place, including options-based volatility management and deployments of some BTC to third parties.
The company increased direct Bitcoin exposure in July, moving from 9,477.16 BTC at quarter-end to about 14,139 BTC by July 31, including pledged BTC.
Counterparty and liquidity risks are explicitly flagged for Bitcoin-yield strategies, including default risk and limits on selling or pledging deployed BTC.
Why Trump Media is changing its digital-asset plan
Trump Media’s shift comes as investors focus on how publicly traded firms balance crypto exposure with the accounting swings that unrealized losses can create. In its second-quarter reporting, the company said its existing digital-asset and securities positions generated significant unrealized markdowns. Those losses, it said, were part of what drove the quarter’s large net loss figure.
Rather than retreating from Bitcoin, Trump Media emphasized that the revamp is intended to “preserve” long-term exposure while addressing volatility and making the balance sheet work more efficiently. The company also said it plans to direct more resources toward Truth Social, Truth+, and other media operations, framing the treasury shift as part of a broader capital allocation change.
Because the group is tied to former U.S. President Donald Trump, the broader context matters for market watchers. The filing notes that a trust holding roughly 41.1% of Trump Media’s voting power as of Feb. 25 remains the sole beneficiary of Trump Media voting power, according to the company’s latest annual report.
What the Q2 filing says about Bitcoin strategy
Trump Media’s Q2 documentation indicates it is not treating Bitcoin purely as a long-term spot holding. Instead, the company described a framework that already includes options to manage Bitcoin volatility and generate premium income. It also reported using part of its BTC in lending and other yield-style arrangements.
As of June 30, Trump Media held 9,477.16 Bitcoin, down slightly from 9,542.16 BTC at the end of the prior quarter. Separately, it reported pledging 2,077.34 BTC as collateral for its options strategy. The company also said 4,260.73 BTC was serving as collateral for convertible notes.
That structure shows a balancing act: maintaining Bitcoin exposure while ring-fencing assets for derivatives and financing obligations. It also highlights how pledged collateral can constrain a company’s flexibility during drawdowns or liquidity events.
July: Bitcoin-related sales followed by increased BTC exposure
While the second quarter itself left Trump Media’s direct Bitcoin holding relatively stable, the company later stepped up its Bitcoin exposure in July. By July 31, Trump Media said it held approximately 14,139 BTC, including pledged Bitcoin, which it valued at about $890.5 million at the time of reporting.
The path to that increase was tied to an intermediate step: the company said it sold Bitcoin-related securities worth $159.6 million in July and used the proceeds to purchase Bitcoin. This matters because it suggests the company viewed those securities as a temporary component in its capital deployment rather than a permanent replacement for direct BTC exposure.
For readers tracking how non-traditional crypto entrants manage treasury assets, the key takeaway is that Trump Media’s exposure management appears active rather than passive. The company is also maintaining a portfolio where some Bitcoin remains tied up—through pledges and other arrangements—while the headline BTC totals can rise through incremental purchases.
Risks Trump Media says it faces with BTC yield activities
Trump Media’s filings do not just outline how it earns additional income; they also provide a clear warning about the trade-offs. The company stated it deployed a portion of its Bitcoin holdings to third parties via lending, placement, and other yield-generating arrangements, describing these as relatively new strategies.
According to the company, some counterparties may not be rated by major credit rating agencies. That increases the risk that counterparties could default during periods such as market downturns, liquidity crises, or other financial stress.
Trump Media also warned that if an arrangement is unsecured, it may be unable to recover its Bitcoin in the event a counterparty becomes insolvent. It added that its ability to sell or pledge Bitcoin can be limited while assets are deployed, and that counterparties may use the assets at their discretion.
These disclosures are especially relevant when paired with the company’s decision to revamp its treasury strategy. The new framework is positioned as a way to maintain long-term exposure and reduce volatility, but the filings indicate the risk is not only market-driven. It is also operational and credit-driven—tied to whether deployed Bitcoin is recoverable and how counterparties behave under stress.
In other words, the company is trying to enhance balance-sheet performance while accepting that yield-style BTC deployments can introduce new failure modes that typical spot holding does not.
What investors should watch next
Trump Media has flagged both accounting volatility from unrealized losses and credit/liquidity risk from its Bitcoin-yield counterparties. Going forward, investors will likely focus on how the company implements its revamped treasury framework—particularly whether it changes the share of Bitcoin deployed to third parties versus retained as pledged collateral or held directly, and how those choices affect reported results in subsequent quarters.
This article was originally published as Trump Media Plans Crypto Treasury Overhaul After $238M Q2 Loss on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Thailand tengah meluncurkan fasilitas pemotongan pajak yang ditargetkan bagi investor kripto: mulai 1 Januari 2025, pajak capital gains atas keuntungan dari perdagangan kripto yang dilakukan melalui platform berlisensi oleh Komisi Sekuritas dan Bursa Thailand akan dikecualikan selama lima tahun, hingga 31 Desember 2029.
Langkah ini dirancang untuk memperkuat posisi Thailand sebagai pusat aset digital regional, sekaligus menarik garis yang jelas antara platform onshore yang teregulasi dan aktivitas perdagangan yang terjadi di luar lisensi—di mana investor tetap dikenai tarif pajak penghasilan pribadi standar hingga 38%.

BlackRock is expanding its Canada-listed ETF lineup with two new iShares products that begin trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) this week. The most notable addition blends traditional equities with a small, fixed allocation to Bitcoin exposure.
Both funds are managed by BlackRock Asset Management Canada under the RBC iShares alliance. They are designed for investors seeking diversified market exposure—either broadly outside North America, or a balanced mix that includes a Bitcoin sleeve.
Key takeaways
BlackRock Canada launched two TSX-listed iShares ETFs: IBQT (equities plus a 3% Bitcoin allocation) and XINT (international equity exposure).
IBQT’s structure targets a diversified equity core: 97% in equities via iShares ETFs, alongside 3% Bitcoin exposure via BlackRock’s Canadian iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT).
XINT provides broad non-North America coverage: it tracks the MSCI ACWI ex North America IMI Index, spanning more than 5,000 companies across over 40 markets.
BlackRock positions iShares as the platform: both funds rely primarily on other iShares ETFs rather than direct stock holdings.
BlackRock’s US Bitcoin ETF scale remains a reference point: CoinMarketCap data shows its US-listed iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) holds about $47.9 billion in assets under management.
What BlackRock launched on the TSX
On Monday, BlackRock Canada introduced two ETFs on the Toronto Stock Exchange: the iShares Equity + Bitcoin ETF Portfolio (IBQT) and the iShares Core MSCI All-International Equity Index ETF (XINT).
While both funds sit under the iShares brand and share a common management setup, they differ sharply in how they aim to deliver exposure. IBQT adds a defined Bitcoin component to an otherwise equity-focused portfolio, while XINT is a more traditional, index-tracking international equity fund.
IBQT: a “core equities + 3% Bitcoin” portfolio
The iShares Equity + Bitcoin ETF Portfolio (IBQT) is designed around a straightforward allocation framework. The fund allocates 97% of its portfolio to a mix of equities across Canada, the United States, international markets, and emerging markets. The remaining 3% is allocated to Bitcoin exposure through BlackRock’s Canadian iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT), which trades on Cboe Canada.
According to the launch details, IBQT does not seek to hold individual stocks directly. Instead, it primarily invests in other iShares ETFs to achieve both its diversified equity exposure and its Bitcoin sleeve.
This design choice matters for investors thinking about implementation. A fund-of-funds approach can make it easier to access multiple exposures within a single product, rather than requiring investors to combine separate equity and Bitcoin funds themselves—though investors will still want to review the underlying holdings and the total costs across the layered structure.
XINT: broad international equities outside North America
The second product, iShares Core MSCI All-International Equity Index ETF (XINT), is more conventional in its index approach. The ETF tracks the MSCI ACWI ex North America IMI Index.
Based on the provided index description, XINT offers exposure to more than 5,000 companies spread across over 40 developed and emerging markets, covering regions outside both Canada and the United States.
For investors who already hold North American equities and want a non-overlapping allocation, XINT’s benchmark selection is intended to fill that gap. By tracking a widely diversified index outside North America, it also reduces the need to make region-by-region allocation decisions, at least at the index construction level.
Why this matters for Canadian ETF investors
BlackRock’s move reflects a broader shift in how crypto exposure is being packaged for mainstream portfolios—often in small, rules-based allocations rather than all-in constructions. IBQT’s fixed 3% Bitcoin allocation is a concrete example of that approach: it aims to keep the portfolio heavily equity-oriented while adding a measured amount of BTC-linked exposure.
At the same time, BlackRock is keeping the rest of the implementation familiar. Both funds are described as relying primarily on iShares ETFs, which signals that BlackRock is leveraging its existing ETF ecosystem to deliver new outcomes—rather than creating a wholly separate investment framework for crypto-linked products in Canada.
BlackRock said its iShares business managed approximately $6.2 trillion in assets across more than 1,700 ETFs as of June 30. That scale can be relevant for Canadian investors because it suggests ongoing operational capacity and product development across the iShares range, including the integration of new crypto components into established ETF formats.
Bitcoin ETF momentum remains a key backdrop
The launch of IBQT also lands against ongoing momentum in BlackRock’s US Bitcoin ETF business. The US-listed iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) is described as the largest US spot Bitcoin ETF by assets under management, with about $47.9 billion in AUM, according to CoinMarketCap.
While IBQT is a Canada-focused product and XINT is an equities-only index fund, BlackRock’s shared branding and ETF infrastructure underscore a key reality: the firm’s crypto products are increasingly becoming part of a broader ETF platform strategy, rather than operating as isolated experiments.
Going forward, investors should watch how IBQT’s trading and flows develop on the TSX, including whether the “small fixed Bitcoin sleeve” format draws demand from advisors and retail investors seeking easier portfolio integration. It will also be important to track how regulators and market participants continue to treat crypto-linked exchange-traded products in Canada, since that environment will shape how quickly similar portfolio-style offerings spread.
This article was originally published as BlackRock Debuts Two Canada ETFs; One Adds 3% Bitcoin Exposure on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Senat AS dijadwalkan membahas kembali Undang-Undang Keterbukaan Pasar Aset Digital (CLARITY) setelah masa reses selama sebulan, dengan Pemimpin Mayoritas John Thune mengajukan mosi cloture untuk mengarahkan RUU tersebut menuju pemungutan suara di sidang lantai. Langkah prosedural ini, yang dilaporkan oleh Senate Daily Press, secara efektif mengakhiri spekulasi bahwa anggota parlemen mungkin akan membawa langkah tersebut ke depan sebelum September meskipun RUU itu sudah disahkan oleh Dewan lebih dari setahun lalu.
Jika RUU tersebut sampai ke ruang sidang, Senat akan membutuhkan ambang batas 60 suara untuk meloloskan CLARITY, yang berarti dukungan bipartisan tetap menjadi kunci. Dorongan hingga pertengahan September juga jatuh dengan waktu yang lebih sedikit untuk membangun momentum seiring mendekatnya pemilihan sela paruh waktu 2026, sebuah masalah waktu yang telah memperbesar rasa frustrasi di kalangan pemimpin industri kripto dan anggota legislatif yang telah mendukung rancangan undang-undang tersebut.

Crypto payments platform Coinsbuy says it has covered all client losses after wallets tied to the service were allegedly drained on Sunday. Blockchain investigator SpecterAnalyst reported that more than $7.9 million was moved out across Ethereum and TRON, with parts of the proceeds routed through exchanges and into Monero.
According to SpecterAnalyst’s Telegram post, the attacker initially began converting the stolen funds into Monero via exchange activity. The same report claimed ChangeNOW was involved in freezing a six-figure portion of the assets during the incident.
Key takeaways
Coinsbuy confirmed an Aug. 9 security incident and stated affected client funds were fully covered from its own reserves.
SpecterAnalyst alleged that attackers moved over $7.9 million across Ethereum and TRON, with additional steps to route value into Monero.
Coinsbuy temporarily paused deposits and withdrawals, later restoring both services to normal operations.
The platform offered a $100,000 reward for information leading to the identification of those responsible, with an extra bonus for help recovering the funds.
Alleged multi-chain drain and attempts to obscure proceeds
SpecterAnalyst’s report focused on on-chain activity tied to Coinsbuy-linked wallets. The investigator said the stolen funds were routed through multiple addresses and then moved onward into Monero through exchange interfaces, a strategy commonly associated with attempts to reduce traceability.
In the same Telegram post, SpecterAnalyst identified three addresses linked to the compromised funds—two on Ethereum and one on TRON—suggesting the attacker exploited access across more than one network rather than relying on a single chain or transfer pattern.
The alleged scale is central to why this case matters for the broader payments market: payments platforms typically sit at a crossroads between user custody, exchange-like routing, and business workflows. When that infrastructure is compromised, the incident can quickly ripple from a single compromised wallet into large cross-chain movements.
Coinsbuy response: coverage from reserves and operational restart
Coinsbuy acknowledged the incident in a statement shared with Cointelegraph. The company said unauthorized withdrawals affected several platform wallets, but that all affected client funds have been fully covered from its own reserves—meaning users were not expected to bear direct financial loss.
Coinsbuy also said the platform is back to normal operation, with deposits and withdrawals restored. SpecterAnalyst previously reported that Coinsbuy temporarily paused both deposits and withdrawals following the incident before reinstating service.
While Coinsbuy did not confirm or dispute the reported $7.9 million figure attributed by SpecterAnalyst, it did not provide additional technical details during the early stages of investigation. The company said it is still investigating and plans to disclose technical information only after its review is complete and findings are verified.
Freezing assistance and what remains unclear
SpecterAnalyst claimed that ChangeNOW helped freeze a six-figure portion of the assets during the incident. That point is important for investors and operators because it highlights how quickly counterparties can sometimes mitigate exposure once abnormal flows become apparent. At the same time, the overall timeline, the exact mechanism used by the attacker, and the full extent of assets that were frozen versus successfully moved were not fully substantiated in the publicly available reporting.
Coinsbuy’s statement did not detail the attack method or explain whether compromised keys, misconfigured permissions, or another failure mode was responsible. For readers, the key takeaway is that the public narrative currently rests on investigator tracing of blockchain activity and the platform’s assurance of coverage, rather than on confirmed technical findings.
Given that the platform is delaying technical disclosure until verification, what watchers should monitor next is whether Coinsbuy’s eventual investigation identifies the initial breach vector and whether it leads to changes in internal controls, monitoring, or custody procedures across its networks.
Incentives for information and possible recovery efforts
Beyond covering client funds, Coinsbuy said it offered a $100,000 reward for information that leads to identifying those responsible. The platform also indicated it would provide an additional bonus for help recovering stolen funds.
Rewards of this type can be a practical lever for incident response, especially when stolen assets are dispersed across exchanges and networks. They can also encourage third parties—such as analysts who can link wallets to identities or brokers who may have custody-relevant information—to share actionable details before assets become permanently difficult to trace.
For users of crypto payments infrastructure, the reward plus coverage stance provides some near-term stability, but it does not eliminate the longer-term concern that vulnerabilities in operational security can recur if root causes are not addressed. The most consequential follow-up will be whether Coinsbuy’s later disclosures point to structural weaknesses that can affect other platforms with similar architectures.
As Coinsbuy continues its investigation and refrains from releasing technical details for now, the next signals to watch are: any confirmed update on the attackers’ initial access method, whether additional funds beyond what was reportedly frozen can be recovered, and what operational or custody safeguards the company says it will change after verification.
This article was originally published as Coinsbuy Announces $100K Reward After Sunday Security Breach on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.