Funny shift in discourse: Bryan Johnson notes that the classic dunk on longevity work—"we're all gonna die anyway!"—has gotten way quieter in 2024. Why? Because AI existential risk conversations have people suddenly very interested in not dying. When AGI timelines compress and everyone's debating alignment failures, mortality becomes less of a philosophical given and more of an engineering problem worth solving. The irony: AI doom scenarios are accidentally making longevity research seem less crazy. If we're racing against superintelligence timelines, maybe extending human lifespan isn't such a weird priority after all.