Starknet has spent years as one of Ethereum's best-known layer 2 networks. Now it says it is considering going independent, and the market reacted fast. Here is what is actually on the table and what is still just an idea.
📌 The news
On October 8, Starknet said it was considering becoming an independent layer 1, replacing its reliance on Ethereum's security, per CryptoSlate. It also targets 2027 to become what it calls the first fully quantum-resistant network. CryptoSlate stresses this is a consideration, not an approved migration timetable.
🔍 Why it matters
Today Starknet settles to Ethereum and uses it for data availability. StarkWare's June roadmap has three phases, and the third depends on Ethereum's own migration, which the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol cluster targets for December 2029. Going independent would remove that dependency, but also the security Ethereum provides.
📊 The numbers
• $STRK: about $0.104 on Monday, down about 6% in 24h, after a seven-day gain CryptoSlate measured at about 117%
• Futures volume: about $3.5B in one day, with $258.5M in open interest (CoinGlass via CryptoSlate)
• October 15 unlock: up to 127M STRK, about 1.27% of the original 10B supply
• Monthly unlocks of up to 127M continue through March 2027
⚖️ Bull vs bear case
Bull case: a faster path to quantum resistance and full control over the roadmap could set Starknet apart from other rollups.
Bear case: the plan is unapproved, much of the rally came through leveraged futures, and steady unlocks add supply every month.
👀 What to watch next
• Any formal governance proposal for the layer 1 move
• Price behaviour around the October 15 unlock
• Reactions from Ethereum developers and other layer 2 teams
━━━━━━━━━━━━
💡 My take: The quantum angle is a real differentiator, but a network leaving Ethereum gives up a lot of borrowed trust. I would wait for a concrete proposal before treating this as more than a narrative. That is my view.
💬 Would you use Starknet more or less if it became its own layer 1?