$ZEN scored 75/100 on both the quick public-risk scan and deeper TokenToolHub contract intelligence.
Contract:
0xf43eB8De897Fbc7F2502483B2Bef7Bb9EA179229
Network: Base
Key findings:
• Source verified
• Honeypot: Not detected
• Buy tax: 0%
• Sell tax: 0%
• Proxy: Not detected
• Current supply: 21M $ZEN
• Supply expansion: Present
• Wallet restrictions: Not detected
• Mutable fees/taxes: Not detected
• Trading switches: Not detected
• Transaction/wallet limits: Not detected
• Emergency pause: Not detected
• Upgrade authority: Not detected
• Asset recovery: Not detected
• Generic external execution: Not detected
The deeper scan identified one material risk scenario:
• Possible supply dilution
The verified contract exposes:
mint(address,uint256)
That means additional supply may potentially be created if an effective authority can exercise the mint path.
The important unresolved question is who currently controls that capability.
TokenToolHub could not fully resolve the privileged address behind the material authority surface.
That makes the next verification steps straightforward:
• Identify the mint authority
• Confirm whether supply is capped
• Check governance, multisig or timelock protection
• Monitor zero-address Transfer events for new issuance
The rest of the current contract surface is comparatively limited.
No blacklist was detected.
No mutable fee-setting path was detected.
No pause control was detected.
No proxy or upgrade path was detected.
No generic external execution concern was detected.
Recent contract activity and token-transfer activity were unavailable, so recent mint activity remains unresolved rather than assumed absent.
The takeaway:
$ZEN currently shows a relatively simple control surface.
The main trust assumption is supply authority.
Full $ZEN scan:
https://tokentoolhub.com/token-safety-checker/?net=base&address=0xf43eB8De897Fbc7F2502483B2Bef7Bb9EA179229