offthebot

82 penayangan
8 Berdiskusi
Matrix Kinetic
·
--
Lihat terjemahan
Off the bot #[2](https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/385841762668124), five days later. $BTC fell from 75,954 to 71,596, −5.7%. Same two grids as in that post: – Reverse grid, pays in BTC: +5.03% → +9.6% more BTC. On a fall it buys coins back. – Infinity grid, pays in USDT: +1.05% → −2.39%. It holds BTC, so it fell with it. In dollars the pair went from +2.6% to about zero. Plain BTC bought the same day: −6.5%. Not a hedge, a cushion: the fall cost half. How did this dump treat your positions? #bitcoin #GridTrading #OffTheBot
Off the bot #2, five days later. $BTC fell from 75,954 to 71,596, −5.7%. Same two grids as in that post:
– Reverse grid, pays in BTC: +5.03% → +9.6% more BTC. On a fall it buys coins back.
– Infinity grid, pays in USDT: +1.05% → −2.39%. It holds BTC, so it fell with it.
In dollars the pair went from +2.6% to about zero. Plain BTC bought the same day: −6.5%. Not a hedge, a cushion: the fall cost half.
How did this dump treat your positions?
#bitcoin #GridTrading #OffTheBot
Up or flat
Down less than 5%
Down more than 5%
In cash, now buying
16 jam lagi
Artikel
Lihat terjemahan
Where's your money?Off the bot # [4](https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/384308244291606). Everyone asks what to buy. Almost nobody asks why, or with what money. Until you know where your capital sits, what it's made of, and how much of it you can spend or lose, nothing else matters. You're not trading. You're playing a casino with the whole stack, and against yourself. My rule fits in one line: no single failure should wipe out all my capital, or even a big part of it. Not a bank, not an exchange, not a wallet, not a position, not a price move. So I split it three ways. Level 1: in what Not one asset. That includes the dollar. I count my portfolio in $BTC , but I live on fiat, so my cash sits in several currencies: the ones I earn in and the ones I pay my bills in. My crypto isn't one coin either. Level 2: where Not one place. Banks, exchanges, wallets. Any of them can freeze, fail or lock you out, and 2022 reminded everyone. If one goes, I lose a part, not everything. Level 3: for what The level most people skip, and the one that matters most. Every part of the capital has a job: – Reserve: months of expenses. Untouchable. – Ammo: cash above the reserve, waiting for its moment. – For buy-back: money from what I sold, waiting to become coins again. – Trading: spot and futures. Losses here are part of the plan, and they can't reach beyond this slice. – Long-term: investments. I count them in BTC: if my BTC balance grows, I'm doing it right. You can count in dollars or anything else. A daily recurring buy isn't another job. It's a pipe from ammo into trading. And every part splits further. My capital is a molecule: it's made of atoms, the atoms split too, and each piece has its own job. Trading alone holds spot, grids, futures margin and a small experimental cell for my bots. How it plays out On Oct 29 my futures bot was liquidated in $TIA : −$49. That bot lives in the experimental cell, a small part of the trading part. The loss hit that cell and nothing else. A year ago, for the first time in my life, I sold all my alts and the BTC from the last rally, on a monthly close below the 12-month average, roughly the 365-day one. My old BTC stayed where it was. Today 89% of that portfolio is cash, not counting futures and old BTC. That's not running from the market. Every dollar has a job. I'm coming back in drops, not in one move. In 2022 $BTC spent months below its 200-week EMA, so near that line I switched on a daily recurring buy instead of going all in at once. It buys double on fear, so I size it by that: what it spends if it buys double every single day. Right now BTC is about 6% above that line, and CoinMarketCap's Fear & Greed index reads 26, fear. My recurring buy is buying double. The panel This is my capital allocator. The numbers on it are placeholders, not mine. What matters is what it does. I enter my cash, my coins and the job of each part, plus income and expenses. One screen then shows where I am and with what: – the BTC cycle: last month against the 12-month average, and the distance to the 200-week EMA; – every bucket in dollars and as a share, the reserve in months of expenses; – trading against the target share for this phase of the cycle; – what different daily buying paces leave me in 12 months, after living costs, and in a stress case where income drops; – what's left to buy back from what I sold, and where I break even. I built it to make these calls right on the chart. Mine has my numbers, and every day they answer one question: what job does each dollar have? The blue stripes are the months BTC spent below its 200-week EMA this year. That's why I come back in drops. Why drops? Because I don't know whether price will dip under the 200-week EMA once more or turn up from here. The last cycle ran from 16K at the low to 126K at the high. Sold at 126K, an average of 16K, 20K or 30K means ×7.9, ×6.3 or ×4.2. All three win. Only the first one needed you to guess the bottom. My own BTC from that cycle averages about 28K. Not the bottom, and it didn't need to be. I don't catch tops either. I build in drops and exit through a grid, for the same reason: I don't know where the low or the high is, and chasing either one is greed. So why don't I hold TIA? I see no reason to keep it in my investment portfolio. Why do I trade it? Because it's volatile. Same coin, different cell. Why did you buy it? Bought FIL or TIA? Then answer one question first: why. To hold, or to trade? The answer picks the cell, the size and the exit. And leave emotions out of it. Regret a 10% take when the coin then ran 100%? That's greed for the top, the same as hunting the bottom. Next time set a trailing take that starts at +10% and go to sleep. Automate everything you can. First the budget: your expenses and what covers them. Then a job for each cell. Then risk, but only the surplus, and with a reason, not with hope. So, where's your money? Don't answer with the total. Answer for each part: where it sits and what job it has. #money #RiskManagement #InvestSmartly #OffTheBot

Where's your money?

Off the bot # 4. Everyone asks what to buy. Almost nobody asks why, or with what money.
Until you know where your capital sits, what it's made of, and how much of it you can spend or lose, nothing else matters. You're not trading. You're playing a casino with the whole stack, and against yourself.
My rule fits in one line: no single failure should wipe out all my capital, or even a big part of it. Not a bank, not an exchange, not a wallet, not a position, not a price move. So I split it three ways.
Level 1: in what
Not one asset. That includes the dollar. I count my portfolio in $BTC , but I live on fiat, so my cash sits in several currencies: the ones I earn in and the ones I pay my bills in. My crypto isn't one coin either.
Level 2: where
Not one place. Banks, exchanges, wallets. Any of them can freeze, fail or lock you out, and 2022 reminded everyone. If one goes, I lose a part, not everything.
Level 3: for what
The level most people skip, and the one that matters most. Every part of the capital has a job:
– Reserve: months of expenses. Untouchable.
– Ammo: cash above the reserve, waiting for its moment.
– For buy-back: money from what I sold, waiting to become coins again.
– Trading: spot and futures. Losses here are part of the plan, and they can't reach beyond this slice.
– Long-term: investments. I count them in BTC: if my BTC balance grows, I'm doing it right. You can count in dollars or anything else.
A daily recurring buy isn't another job. It's a pipe from ammo into trading.
And every part splits further. My capital is a molecule: it's made of atoms, the atoms split too, and each piece has its own job. Trading alone holds spot, grids, futures margin and a small experimental cell for my bots.
How it plays out
On Oct 29 my futures bot was liquidated in $TIA : −$49. That bot lives in the experimental cell, a small part of the trading part. The loss hit that cell and nothing else.
A year ago, for the first time in my life, I sold all my alts and the BTC from the last rally, on a monthly close below the 12-month average, roughly the 365-day one. My old BTC stayed where it was. Today 89% of that portfolio is cash, not counting futures and old BTC. That's not running from the market. Every dollar has a job.
I'm coming back in drops, not in one move. In 2022 $BTC spent months below its 200-week EMA, so near that line I switched on a daily recurring buy instead of going all in at once. It buys double on fear, so I size it by that: what it spends if it buys double every single day.
Right now BTC is about 6% above that line, and CoinMarketCap's Fear & Greed index reads 26, fear. My recurring buy is buying double.
The panel
This is my capital allocator. The numbers on it are placeholders, not mine. What matters is what it does. I enter my cash, my coins and the job of each part, plus income and expenses. One screen then shows where I am and with what:
– the BTC cycle: last month against the 12-month average, and the distance to the 200-week EMA;
– every bucket in dollars and as a share, the reserve in months of expenses;
– trading against the target share for this phase of the cycle;
– what different daily buying paces leave me in 12 months, after living costs, and in a stress case where income drops;
– what's left to buy back from what I sold, and where I break even.
I built it to make these calls right on the chart. Mine has my numbers, and every day they answer one question: what job does each dollar have?
The blue stripes are the months BTC spent below its 200-week EMA this year. That's why I come back in drops.
Why drops? Because I don't know whether price will dip under the 200-week EMA once more or turn up from here. The last cycle ran from 16K at the low to 126K at the high. Sold at 126K, an average of 16K, 20K or 30K means ×7.9, ×6.3 or ×4.2. All three win. Only the first one needed you to guess the bottom. My own BTC from that cycle averages about 28K. Not the bottom, and it didn't need to be. I don't catch tops either. I build in drops and exit through a grid, for the same reason: I don't know where the low or the high is, and chasing either one is greed.
So why don't I hold TIA?
I see no reason to keep it in my investment portfolio. Why do I trade it? Because it's volatile. Same coin, different cell.
Why did you buy it?
Bought FIL or TIA? Then answer one question first: why. To hold, or to trade? The answer picks the cell, the size and the exit.
And leave emotions out of it. Regret a 10% take when the coin then ran 100%? That's greed for the top, the same as hunting the bottom. Next time set a trailing take that starts at +10% and go to sleep. Automate everything you can.
First the budget: your expenses and what covers them. Then a job for each cell. Then risk, but only the surplus, and with a reason, not with hope.
So, where's your money? Don't answer with the total. Answer for each part: where it sits and what job it has.
#money #RiskManagement #InvestSmartly #OffTheBot
Bot dinonaktifkan # [3](https://www.binance.com/ru-UA/square/post/385841762668124). Grid atau rebalancing? Pada BTC +109%: +2% vs +49%. Terakhir kali, saya mengganti staking dengan reverse grid. Ada alat yang lebih sederhana: bot rebalancing 50/50. Koin dan stablecoin, kembali ke porsi yang sama setiap kali salah satunya bergeser. Binance punya fitur bawaan (minimum 200 USDC). Tanpa batas bawah, tanpa batas atas. Sebenarnya ini grid tanpa batas: ambang menentukan jaraknya, dan ukuran transaksi mengecil seiring portofolio, jadi uang tunai tidak pernah habis. Saya menyimulasikan keduanya menggunakan harga per 5 menit. Dalam satuan koin, hasil model berbeda kurang dari satu poin dari grid BTC dan TRX saya yang berjalan, dan 5 poin lebih rendah pada XLM. Di dalam rentang, hasilnya imbang. $XLM −34%: grid −16%, rebalance −16%. Di luar rentang, hasilnya ditentukan oleh rentang tersebut. $BTC +109%: reverse grid menjual semuanya di dekat batas atasnya lalu menyimpan uang tunai, +2%. Rebalance +49%. $TIA −91%: grid −87%, rebalance −51%. Tetap −51%. Ada dua hal yang saya kira akan berpengaruh, ternyata tidak. Ambang: dari 0.25% hingga 10%, hasil pada koin saya nyaris tidak berubah. Biaya: 0.05% atau 0.075%, sama saja. Dan jarak grid yang lebih rapat justru lebih buruk: 0.1% selalu kalah dari 1%. Jadi, mengapa saya tetap memakai grid? Saya menghitung dalam BTC. Selama 190 hari, reverse grid menambah +4.9% dalam satuan koin, rebalance +2.0%. Rebalance membagi hasilnya ke kedua sisi, dan Anda hanya melihat keduanya bertambah jika harga kembali. Namun, rebalance lebih mudah dijalankan. Atur BTC/BNB/TRX/USDT masing-masing sebesar 25%, lalu lupakan. Beberapa bot memungkinkan Anda menambah dana, menarik dana, atau mengubah pengaturan tanpa menghentikannya. Saya juga menjalankan satu bot. Bukan saran. Apa yang akan Anda jalankan selain staking? #trading #RiskManagement #bitcoin #Binance #OffTheBot
Bot dinonaktifkan # 3. Grid atau rebalancing? Pada BTC +109%: +2% vs +49%.

Terakhir kali, saya mengganti staking dengan reverse grid. Ada alat yang lebih sederhana: bot rebalancing 50/50. Koin dan stablecoin, kembali ke porsi yang sama setiap kali salah satunya bergeser. Binance punya fitur bawaan (minimum 200 USDC).
Tanpa batas bawah, tanpa batas atas.

Sebenarnya ini grid tanpa batas: ambang menentukan jaraknya, dan ukuran transaksi mengecil seiring portofolio, jadi uang tunai tidak pernah habis.

Saya menyimulasikan keduanya menggunakan harga per 5 menit. Dalam satuan koin, hasil model berbeda kurang dari satu poin dari grid BTC dan TRX saya yang berjalan, dan 5 poin lebih rendah pada XLM.

Di dalam rentang, hasilnya imbang. $XLM −34%: grid −16%, rebalance −16%.
Di luar rentang, hasilnya ditentukan oleh rentang tersebut. $BTC +109%: reverse grid menjual semuanya di dekat batas atasnya lalu menyimpan uang tunai, +2%. Rebalance +49%. $TIA −91%: grid −87%, rebalance −51%. Tetap −51%.

Ada dua hal yang saya kira akan berpengaruh, ternyata tidak. Ambang: dari 0.25% hingga 10%, hasil pada koin saya nyaris tidak berubah. Biaya: 0.05% atau 0.075%, sama saja. Dan jarak grid yang lebih rapat justru lebih buruk: 0.1% selalu kalah dari 1%.

Jadi, mengapa saya tetap memakai grid? Saya menghitung dalam BTC. Selama 190 hari, reverse grid menambah +4.9% dalam satuan koin, rebalance +2.0%. Rebalance membagi hasilnya ke kedua sisi, dan Anda hanya melihat keduanya bertambah jika harga kembali.

Namun, rebalance lebih mudah dijalankan. Atur BTC/BNB/TRX/USDT masing-masing sebesar 25%, lalu lupakan. Beberapa bot memungkinkan Anda menambah dana, menarik dana, atau mengubah pengaturan tanpa menghentikannya. Saya juga menjalankan satu bot.

Bukan saran. Apa yang akan Anda jalankan selain staking?
#trading #RiskManagement #bitcoin #Binance #OffTheBot
Lihat terjemahan
Almost all of it
About half
A small part
Nothing, I spread it out
16 jam lagi
Takut? $BTC sedang turun selama 6 minggu berturut-turut. Indeks Fear & Greed: 21. Tadi malam saat BTC di 71,5K, saya memasukkan sebagian BTC saya ke grid futures long: order terbawah di 57,8K, titik terendah siklus ini, batas atas di 75K, dengan trailing naik. Leverage 10x di atas kertas, tetapi sebagian besar margin disimpan sebagai cadangan, jadi harga likuidasinya 51.956. Sebelas jam berlalu: −6,69%. Menakutkan? Itu 0,7% di bawah harga rata-rata saya, dikalikan 10. Grid sudah membeli saat harga turun dan menurunkan harga rata-rata ke 69,7K. Di 60K saya akan menggandakannya. Alasan saya tidak menjual: dominasi BTC sedang turun, bukan naik, dan sebagian besar dari 100 aset teratas sedang naik. Kapitulasi sungguhan terlihat berbeda. Saya mungkin salah, dan bot ini akan menunjukkannya secara langsung. Apa yang sedang kalian lakukan sekarang? #fearandgreed #WhatWillDriveCryptoandStocks’NextRebound? #OffTheBot
Takut? $BTC sedang turun selama 6 minggu berturut-turut. Indeks Fear & Greed: 21.

Tadi malam saat BTC di 71,5K, saya memasukkan sebagian BTC saya ke grid futures long: order terbawah di 57,8K, titik terendah siklus ini, batas atas di 75K, dengan trailing naik. Leverage 10x di atas kertas, tetapi sebagian besar margin disimpan sebagai cadangan, jadi harga likuidasinya 51.956.

Sebelas jam berlalu: −6,69%. Menakutkan? Itu 0,7% di bawah harga rata-rata saya, dikalikan 10. Grid sudah membeli saat harga turun dan menurunkan harga rata-rata ke 69,7K. Di 60K saya akan menggandakannya.

Alasan saya tidak menjual: dominasi BTC sedang turun, bukan naik, dan sebagian besar dari 100 aset teratas sedang naik. Kapitulasi sungguhan terlihat berbeda. Saya mungkin salah, dan bot ini akan menunjukkannya secara langsung.

Apa yang sedang kalian lakukan sekarang?

#fearandgreed #WhatWillDriveCryptoandStocks’NextRebound? #OffTheBot
Selling
Holding
Buying
Sitting in cash
16 jam lagi
Lihat terjemahan
Lab check #2. "40% winners at 1:3": everyone quotes it. Math answers it before any backtest. The risk rule in this post is sound: isolated margin, $10 at risk on $1,000. The 40% is the problem. If price has no direction, a stop 1 step away is mathematically hit 3 times more often than a take 3 steps away. At 1:3 that's 25% winners, at 1:1 it's 50%. R:R doesn't create an edge: it only sets the break-even win rate. 40% is a wish, not a result. I checked it anyway: 12 coins, including $ADA $ENA $AVAX , 1-minute data, Aug 2024 to Nov 2026. Stop 4.5%, take 13.5%, random entries, fees in. 3,920 trades, 25.2% winners. 1:1 gave 49.4%, 1:2 gave 33.8%. The market agrees with the math, and fees push it below zero. So 40% at 1:3 isn't a rule. It means winning 4 trades in 10 where chance gives 1 in 4. The best entry I've measured, with an ATR stop, won about 3 in 10. And the losing runs: up to 19 in a row on one coin. Where does your win rate come from? #RiskManagement #trading #OffTheBot
Lab check #2. "40% winners at 1:3": everyone quotes it. Math answers it before any backtest.

The risk rule in this post is sound: isolated margin, $10 at risk on $1,000. The 40% is the problem.

If price has no direction, a stop 1 step away is mathematically hit 3 times more often than a take 3 steps away. At 1:3 that's 25% winners, at 1:1 it's 50%. R:R doesn't create an edge: it only sets the break-even win rate. 40% is a wish, not a result.

I checked it anyway: 12 coins, including $ADA $ENA $AVAX , 1-minute data, Aug 2024 to Nov 2026. Stop 4.5%, take 13.5%, random entries, fees in. 3,920 trades, 25.2% winners. 1:1 gave 49.4%, 1:2 gave 33.8%. The market agrees with the math, and fees push it below zero.

So 40% at 1:3 isn't a rule. It means winning 4 trades in 10 where chance gives 1 in 4. The best entry I've measured, with an ATR stop, won about 3 in 10.

And the losing runs: up to 19 in a row on one coin.

Where does your win rate come from?
#RiskManagement #trading #OffTheBot
Maxim S
·
--
Bagaimana cara trading dengan posisi besar, tetapi hanya mempertaruhkan sedikit uang? 🧠
Saya akan menjelaskan dengan sederhana cara trading yang benar dengan modal $1000 (misalnya)! 👇
Kebanyakan pemula mengira leverage adalah alat untuk melipatgandakan saldo dengan cepat. Akibatnya, mereka memakai leverage 20x, masuk dengan seluruh modal, lalu terkena likuidasi saat pasar baru bergejolak sedikit.

Leverage sebaiknya digunakan bukan untuk memperbesar risiko, melainkan untuk membebaskan modal Anda.
Lihat terjemahan
Off the bot #1. A deaf frog can climb. But the climb is not the goal. A reader staked 30,000 $TIA in [Keplr](https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/383914064424624?sqb=1) and sent me a Chinese fable: "Only a deaf frog can climb to the top of a tall tower." I respect his choice. Let's just open the charts. Three years, same start, price change on CoinMarketCap: $TRX +227% $BNB +202% $BTC +120% TIA −81% TIA did climb: in early 2024 it was up over 600%, ahead of everything on this list. I don't know when my reader bought his 30,000, near the top or at some local bottom. But an alt sitting on a bottom is not a reason to buy it. Some towers are Babel: a staircase up that leads down. I know that tower. TIA and ATOM sat in my Keplr too. A year ago I sold everything except BTC from the previous cycle (average around 28K). The trigger: BTC closed a month below its 12-month average. For me, that's where a bull market ends. Not a feeling, a rule. The same rule is bringing me back. BTC closed a month above that average again, and I'm returning to speculative positions in alts. Not at the bottom of 57.7K, but later and higher. The right price isn't the lowest one. It's the confirmed one. Exceptions to this rule? There are. But that's another story. Long-term buying is a separate track. When BTC fell below its 200-week EMA, the cycle bottom for me, I switched on regular buys of my favorites. What I buy doesn't sit as dead weight: it goes to spot grid bots and keeps working. A deaf frog can climb. But the climb is a path, not a goal. I know my goals. Does the frog know its own? I can't tell. If the goal is to catch a few X's by buying some bottom, that's not a goal. That's hope. And hope and a goal are different things. What's the goal behind the coin you hold? #RiskManagement #InvestSmart #bitcoin #OffTheBot P.S. The market is sleepy and my bot has nothing new to report. A good excuse to talk about everything around it. Hence the #1.
Off the bot #1. A deaf frog can climb. But the climb is not the goal.

A reader staked 30,000 $TIA in Keplr and sent me a Chinese fable: "Only a deaf frog can climb to the top of a tall tower."

I respect his choice. Let's just open the charts. Three years, same start, price change on CoinMarketCap:

$TRX +227% $BNB +202% $BTC +120% TIA −81%

TIA did climb: in early 2024 it was up over 600%, ahead of everything on this list. I don't know when my reader bought his 30,000, near the top or at some local bottom. But an alt sitting on a bottom is not a reason to buy it. Some towers are Babel: a staircase up that leads down.

I know that tower. TIA and ATOM sat in my Keplr too. A year ago I sold everything except BTC from the previous cycle (average around 28K). The trigger: BTC closed a month below its 12-month average. For me, that's where a bull market ends. Not a feeling, a rule.
The same rule is bringing me back. BTC closed a month above that average again, and I'm returning to speculative positions in alts. Not at the bottom of 57.7K, but later and higher. The right price isn't the lowest one. It's the confirmed one.

Exceptions to this rule? There are. But that's another story.

Long-term buying is a separate track. When BTC fell below its 200-week EMA, the cycle bottom for me, I switched on regular buys of my favorites. What I buy doesn't sit as dead weight: it goes to spot grid bots and keeps working.

A deaf frog can climb. But the climb is a path, not a goal. I know my goals. Does the frog know its own? I can't tell. If the goal is to catch a few X's by buying some bottom, that's not a goal. That's hope. And hope and a goal are different things.

What's the goal behind the coin you hold?

#RiskManagement #InvestSmart #bitcoin #OffTheBot

P.S. The market is sleepy and my bot has nothing new to report. A good excuse to talk about everything around it. Hence the #1.
Masuk untuk menjelajahi konten lainnya
Bergabunglah dengan pengguna kripto global di Binance Square
⚡️ Dapatkan informasi terbaru dan berguna tentang kripto.
💬 Dipercayai oleh bursa kripto terbesar di dunia.
👍 Temukan wawasan nyata dari kreator terverifikasi.
Email/Nomor Ponsel