TechnicalTrader

In 2013, a man named Davinci Jeremie, who was a YouTuber and early Bitcoin user, told people to invest just $1 in Bitcoin. At that time, one Bitcoin cost about $116. He said it was a small risk because even if Bitcoin became worthless, they would only lose $1. But if Bitcoin's value increased, it could bring big rewards. Sadly, not many people listened to him at the time.
Today, Bitcoin's price has gone up a lot, reaching over $95,000 at its highest point. People who took Jeremie’s advice and bought Bitcoin are now very rich. Thanks to this early investment, Jeremie now lives a luxurious life with yachts, private planes, and fancy cars. His story shows how small investments in new things can lead to big gains.
what do you think about this. don't forget to comment.
Follow for more information🙂
#bitcoin☀️

I was looking through some old digital files the other day and realized how many things I have lost over the years because a service shut down or I forgot to pay a monthly bill. It is a strange feeling to realize your personal history is held by companies that do not really know you. I started using Walrus because I wanted a different way to handle my data that felt more like owning a physical box in a real room. It is a storage network that does not try to hide the reality of how computers work behind a curtain.
You know how it is when you just want a file to stay put without worrying about a middleman. In this system everything is measured in epochs which are just blocks of time on the network. When I put something into storage I can choose to pay for its life for up to two years. It was a bit of a reality check to see a countdown on my data but it makes sense when you think about it. If you want something to last forever you have to have a plan for how to keep the lights on.
"Nothing on the internet is actually permanent unless someone is paying for the electricity."
I realized that the best part about this setup is that it uses the Sui blockchain to manage the time. I can actually set up a shared object that holds some digital coins and it acts like a battery for my files. Whenever the expiration date gets close the coins are used to buy more time automatically. It is a relief to know I can build a system that takes care of itself instead of waiting for an email saying my credit card expired and my photos are gone.
The rules for deleting things are also very clear which I appreciate as a user who values my space. When I upload a blob I can mark it as deletable. This means if I decide I do not need it later I can clear it out and the network lets me reuse that storage for something else. It is great for when I am working on drafts of a project. But if I do not mark it that way the network gives me a solid guarantee that it will be there for every second of the time I paid for.
"A guarantee is only as good as the code that enforces the storage limits."
One thing that surprised me was how fast I could get to my data. Usually these kinds of networks are slow because they have to do a lot of math to put your files back together. But Walrus has this feature called partial reads. It stores the original pieces of the file in a few different spots. If the network can see those pieces it just hands them to me directly without any extra processing. It makes the whole experience feel snappy and responsive even when I am dealing with bigger files.
I also had to learn how the network handles stuff it does not want to keep. There is no central office that censors what goes onto the network. Instead every person running a storage node has their own list of things they refuse to carry. If a node finds something it does not like it can just delete its pieces of that file and stop helping. As long as most of the nodes are fine with the file it stays available for everyone to see.
"The network decides what to remember and what to forget through a messy democratic process."
It is interesting to see how the system gets better as it grows. Most platforms get bogged down when too many people use them but this one is designed to scale out. When more storage nodes join the network the total speed for writing and reading actually goes up. It is all happening in parallel so the more machines there are the more bandwidth we all get to share. It feels like a community effort where everyone bringing a shovel makes the hole get dug faster.
"Capacity is a choice made by those willing to pay for the hardware."
I think the reason I keep using this project is because it treats me like an adult. It does not promise me magic or tell me that storage is free when it clearly is not. It gives me the tools to manage my own digital footprint and shows me exactly how the gears are turning. There is a certain peace of mind that comes from knowing exactly where your data is and how long it is going to stay there. It makes the digital world feel a little more solid and a little less like it could vanish at any moment.
"Data ownership is mostly about knowing exactly who is holding the pieces of your life."
I have started moving my most important documents over because I like the transparency of the whole process. I can check the status of my files through a light client without needing to trust a single company to tell me the truth. It is a shift in how I think about my digital life but it is one that makes me feel much more secure. Having a direct relationship with the storage itself changes everything about how I value what I save.
what you think about this? don't forget to comment 💭
Follow for more content 🙂
$WAL #Walrus @WalrusProtocol

I found out the hard way why Walrus is different. It happened on a Tuesday when my local network was acting like a total disaster. I was trying to upload a large file and half my connection just died mid-stream. Usually that means the file is broken or I have to start over from scratch because the data did not land everywhere it was supposed to go. In most systems if a node crashes or the internet hiccups while you are saving something the data just stays in this weird limbo. But with Walrus I noticed something strange. Even though my connection was failing the system just kept moving. It felt like the network was actually helping me fix my own mistakes in real-time.
"The network does not need every piece to be perfect to keep your data alive."
That is the first thing you have to understand about being a user here. When we upload a blob which is just a fancy word for any big chunk of data like a photo or a video it gets chopped up. In other systems if the storage node meant to hold your specific piece of data is offline that piece is just gone until the node comes back. Walrus uses this two dimensional encoding trick that sounds complicated but actually works like a safety net. If a node wakes up and realizes it missed a piece of my file it does not just sit there being useless. It reaches out to the other nodes and asks for little bits of their data to rebuild what it lost.
I realized that this makes everything faster for me as a consumer. Because every node eventually gets a full copy of its assigned part I can ask any honest node for my file and get a response. It is all about load balancing. You know how it is when everyone tries to download the same popular file and the server chokes. Here the work is spread out so thin and so wide that no single point of failure can ruin my afternoon. It feels like the system is alive and constantly repairing itself behind the curtain while I just click buttons.
"A smart system expects things to break and builds a way to outlast the damage."
Sometimes the person sending the data is the problem. Not me of course but there are people out there who try to mess with the system by sending broken or fake pieces of a file. In a normal setup that might corrupt the whole thing or leave you with a file that wont open. Walrus has this built in lie detector. If a node gets a piece of data that does not fit the mathematical puzzle it generates a proof of inconsistency. It basically tells the rest of the network that this specific sender is a liar. The nodes then agree to ignore that garbage and move on. As a user I never even see the bad data because the reader I use just rejects anything that does not add up.
"You cannot trust the sender but you can always trust the math."
Then there is the issue of the people running the nodes. These nodes are not permanent fixtures. Since Walrus uses a proof of stake system the group of people looking after our data changes every few months or weeks which they call an epoch. In any other system this transition would be a nightmare. Imagine trying to move a whole library of books to a new building while people are still trying to check them out. You would expect the service to go down or for things to get lost in the mail. But I have used Walrus during these handovers and I barely noticed a thing.
The way they handle it is pretty clever. They do not just flip a switch and hope for the best. When a new group of nodes takes over they start accepting new writes immediately while the old group still handles the reads. It is like having two teams of movers working at once so there is no gap in service. My data gets migrated from the old nodes to the new ones in the background. Even if some of the old nodes are being difficult or slow the new ones use that same recovery trick to pull the data pieces anyway. It ensures that my files are always available even when the entire infrastructure is shifting underneath them.
"Data should stay still even when the servers are moving."
This matters to me because I am tired of worrying about where my digital life actually lives. I want to know that if a data center in another country goes dark or if a malicious user tries to flood the network my files are still there. Walrus feels like a collective memory that refuses to forget. It is not just about storage but about a system that actively fights to stay complete and correct. I do not have to be a genius to use it I just have to trust that the nodes are talking to each other and fixing the gaps.
"Reliability is not about being perfect but about how you handle being broken."
At the end of the day I just want my stuff to work. I want to hit save and know that the network has my back even if my own wifi is failing or if the servers are switching hands. That is why I stick with Walrus. It turns the messy reality of the internet into a smooth experience for me. It is a relief to use a tool that assumes things will go wrong and has a plan for it before I even realize there is a problem.
what you think about this? don't forget to comment 💭
Follow for more content 🙂
$WAL #Walrus @WalrusProtocol

I have been looking for a way to save my files without relying on the big tech companies that seem to own everything we do online. I finally started using Walrus and it changed how I think about digital storage. You know how it is when you upload a photo to a normal cloud service and just hope they do not lose it or peek at it. This feels different because it is a decentralized secure blob store which is just a fancy way of saying it breaks your data into tiny pieces and scatters them across a bunch of different computers. I realized that I do not have to trust one single person or company anymore because the system is designed to work even if some of the nodes go offline or act up.

When I first tried to upload something I noticed the process is a bit more involved than just dragging and dropping a file. It starts with something called Red Stuff which sounds like a brand of soda but is actually an encoding algorithm. It takes my file and turns it into these things called slivers. I found out that the system also uses something called RaptorQ codes to make sure that even if some pieces get lost the whole file can still be put back together.
"The biggest lie in the cloud is that your data is ever truly yours."
That is the first thing I realized when I started diving into how this works. With this project I actually feel like I have control. After my computer finishes the encoding it creates a blob id which is basically a unique fingerprint for my file. Then I have to go to the Sui blockchain to buy some space. It is like paying for a parking spot for my data. I tell the blockchain how big the file is and how long I want it to stay there. Once the blockchain gives me the green light I send those little slivers of data out to the storage nodes.
I learned that these nodes are just independent computers sitting in different places. Each one takes a piece and then sends me back a signed receipt. I have to collect a specific number of these receipts to prove that my file is actually safe. Once I have enough I send a certificate back to the blockchain. This moment is what they call the point of availability. It is the exact second where I can finally breathe easy and delete the file from my own hard drive because I know it is living safely on the network.
"Storage is not just about keeping files but about proving they still exist."
Using this system makes you realize that most of our digital lives are built on pinky promises. With this project the blockchain acts like a manager that keeps everyone honest. If a node forgets my data or tries to delete it early the blockchain knows. There is a lot of talk about shards and virtual identities in the technical documents but as a user I just see it as a giant safety net. Even if a physical storage node is huge it might be acting as many smaller virtual nodes to keep things organized. It is just the way things are in this new kind of setup.
When I want my file back the process is surprisingly fast. I do not have to talk to every single node. I just ask a few of them for their slivers and once I have enough I can reconstruct the original file. The cool thing is that the math behind it makes sure that if the file I put together does not match the original fingerprint the system rejects it. This means no one can secretly swap my cat video for a virus without me knowing immediately.
"A system is only as strong as the math that keeps the nodes in line."
I used to worry about whether decentralized stuff would be too slow for regular use. But they have these things called aggregators and caches that help speed things up for popular files. If everyone is trying to download the same thing the system can handle the traffic without breaking a sweat. It feels like the internet is finally growing up and moving away from the old way of doing things where everything was stored in one giant warehouse that could burn down or be locked away.
"You should not have to ask for permission to access your own memories."
Every time I upload a new project or a batch of photos I feel a little more secure. It is not about being a computer genius or understanding every line of code in the Merkle trees or the smart contracts. It is about the reality of knowing that my data is not sitting on a single server in a basement somewhere. It is spread out and protected by a committee of nodes that have a financial reason to keep my stuff safe.
"True privacy is found in the pieces that no one person can read alone."
I like that I can go offline and the network just keeps humming along. The nodes are constantly listening to the blockchain and if they realize they are missing a piece of a file they go through a recovery process to fix it. It is like a self-healing library. As a consumer I just want my stuff to be there when I need it. This project gives me a way to do that while staying away from the typical gatekeepers of the web. It is a bit of a shift in how we think about the internet but it feels like the right direction for anyone who values their digital freedom.

$WAL #Walrus @WalrusProtocol

Have you ever wondered how big data stays safe and accessible in a decentralized world. When we look at the Walrus protocol we are really looking at a clever way to store information so that it never gets lost even if some computers go offline. I want to walk you through how the Read Protocol works within Walrus because it is quite different from your average file download. In this system we use things called nodes to hold pieces of data.
When you want to read a blob of data in Walrus you start by asking for commitments. These commitments are like digital fingerprints that prove the data is real. You do not just take one person word for it. Instead you check these fingerprints against the original record to make sure nobody is trying to trick you. This is the first step in making sure the Walrus network remains honest and reliable for every user involved.
Once you have the right fingerprints you move on to requesting the actual pieces of the file. In the Walrus system these pieces are called primary slivers. You might not get them all at once because the system can send them gradually to save on internet speed. This smart way of handling data is what makes Walrus feel so smooth even when the files are massive.
How Walrus Decodes and Verifies Your Information
The magic happens when you collect enough of these slivers. In the Walrus environment we typically need a specific number of correct pieces to put the puzzle back together. Once you have these pieces you decode them to see the original file. But the Walrus protocol does not stop there. It actually re-encodes the data one more time to double check that everything matches the original post on the blockchain.
If the re-encoded data matches what was originally promised then you get your file. If something is wrong the system simply outputs an error. This rigorous checking is why we can trust Walrus with important information. It ensures that what you write into the system is exactly what you get out of it later. We are basically using math to create a shield around our digital content.
This process might sound complicated but it happens behind the scenes to keep your experience simple. By using these mathematical proofs Walrus avoids the typical risks of central servers. You are not relying on one company but rather on a network of nodes that all verify each other. This transparency is the core strength of the Walrus storage solution.
The Power of Sliver Recovery in the Walrus Network
One of the coolest features of the Walrus protocol is how it handles missing pieces. Sometimes a computer might go offline before it gets its share of the data. In a normal system that might be a problem. However Walrus uses a method called Red Stuff which allows nodes to recover their missing slivers from their neighbors. It is like asking a friend for the notes you missed in class.
Nodes can recover their secondary slivers by asking other honest nodes for specific symbols. Because of the way Walrus organizes data in rows and columns these nodes can rebuild what they are missing quite easily. This means that over time every honest node in the Walrus network will eventually have the full set of information they need to be helpful.
This recovery process is very efficient. Even though nodes are sharing and rebuilding data the cost stays low. The Walrus design ensures that the total communication needed is not much more than a regular read or write. This efficiency is what allows Walrus to grow very large without slowing down or becoming too expensive for the people using it.
Smart Optimizations for Better Performance in Walrus
We are always looking for ways to make things faster and Walrus has some great tricks up its sleeve. One big optimization involves something called source symbols. These are pieces of the real data that have not been scrambled by complex math yet. If you can read these source symbols directly you save a lot of time and computer power.
In the original design of systems like this some data might only live on one node. If that node went to sleep you would have to do a lot of extra work. Walrus fixes this by shuffling where these symbols go. By using a random process Walrus spreads the data out more evenly across the network. This load balancing makes sure no single node gets overwhelmed with requests.
Another smart move in Walrus is reversing the order of symbols during encoding. This means every piece of original data actually exists in two different places. If one node is busy or offline you can just grab the data from the second node. This redundancy makes reading from Walrus much more reliable without adding a lot of extra weight to the system.
Reliability and Fault Tolerance in Walrus
The ultimate goal of the Walrus protocol is to be a truly dependable storage system. Because of the way it handles slivers it is very hard for the system to fail. Even if some nodes act up or go offline the remaining honest nodes have enough information to keep the Walrus network running perfectly. This is what we call being fault tolerant.
When you write data to Walrus the system makes sure that enough nodes have received their pieces before it considers the job done. This guarantees that the data is anchored safely. If a reader comes along later they are guaranteed to find enough pieces to recover the original file. This bond between the writer and the reader is the foundation of the Walrus community.
We also have a rule for consistency. If two different people try to read the same file from Walrus they will always get the same result. They might use different sets of slivers from different nodes but the math ensures the final file is identical. This consistency is vital for any system that wants to replace traditional cloud storage with something more modern and decentralized.
Why Scalability Matters for the Future of Walrus
As more people join the Walrus network the system needs to stay fast. Traditional protocols often get slower as they add more nodes but Walrus is built differently. Because the cost of recovering files is independent of the total number of nodes the system can scale up to massive sizes. This makes Walrus a perfect candidate for global data storage.
We also see that Walrus is very smart about how it uses hardware. It can store the main data on fast drives and keep the recovery pieces on slower cheaper storage. Since the recovery pieces are only needed when something goes wrong this saves money for everyone involved. It is a practical approach to building a high tech storage network.
I think the most exciting part of Walrus is how it combines complex math with a very human goal of keeping our data safe and accessible. It gives us the freedom to store our digital lives without fear of censorship or loss. As we continue to build and improve this protocol the potential for what we can achieve together only grows larger.
what you think about this? don't forget to comment 💭
Follow for more content 🙂
$WAL #Walrus @WalrusProtocol

The digital world is heavy.
Every photo you take, every contract you sign, and every line of code you commit adds to a global mountain of data that never stops growing. We’ve been told for decades that the "Cloud" is this magical, weightless place where things live forever. But honestly? That’s a bit of a myth.
The current version of the internet is actually quite fragile. We rely on a handful of massive companies to hold our digital lives. If they decide to change their terms, or if their servers go dark, our data is at their mercy. That doesn’t feel like freedom. It feels like we’re renting our own memories.
That’s why Walrus exists.
Walrus isn't just another storage locker in the sky. It’s a complete reimagining of how data survives in a decentralized world. When we talk about Walrus, we aren't talking about "traditional" storage. We are talking about a system built to be unshakeable, even when the world around it is in flux.
Walrus is designed to be the backbone of a new internet—one where your data belongs to you, stays available forever, and doesn’t cost a fortune to maintain.
"Data isn't just information; it’s the heartbeat of the modern world, and Walrus is here to make sure that heart never stops beating."
The Problem with Being "Online" Forever
Before we get into the "how" of Walrus, we have to talk about the "why."
In a perfect world, a storage node—a computer that holds a piece of your file—would stay online forever. It would never crash, its hard drive would never fail, and the person running it would never get bored and turn it off.
But we don't live in a perfect world. We live in a world of "churn."
In the tech world, "churn" is what happens when nodes leave the network. Maybe a server in Singapore loses power. Maybe a validator in London decides to upgrade their hardware. In a decentralized system like Walrus, this happens all the time. It’s natural.
The traditional way to fix this is "Replication." If Node A leaves, you copy everything it had over to Node B. But if you have petabytes of data, moving that much info across the internet every time someone’s Wi-Fi blinks is prohibitively expensive. It’s slow. It’s clunky.
Walrus saw this problem and decided to solve it with math that feels a bit like magic.
Actually, it’s called "Red Stuff." And it’s the secret sauce that makes Walrus so incredibly resilient.
Meet "Red Stuff": The DNA of Walrus
At the heart of Walrus is a protocol known as "Red Stuff."
If you want to understand Walrus, you have to understand how it views a file. Most systems see a file as a single block. Walrus sees a file as a two-dimensional puzzle.
Instead of just splitting a file into a few pieces and hoping for the best, Walrus uses something called 2D-encoding. Imagine taking a document and turning it into a grid.
The Vertical and the Horizontal
In the Walrus ecosystem, every blob of data is split into two dimensions:
1- Primary Slivers (The Columns): This is the vertical dimension.
2- Secondary Slivers (The Rows): This is the horizontal dimension.
When a writer sends a file to Walrus, they don't just send one version. They encode it so that every single storage node in the Walrus network holds a "Sliver Pair"—one primary and one secondary.
Why go to all this trouble? Because of recovery.
Imagine a storage node—let’s call it Node 4—suddenly goes offline. It loses its data. In a normal system, Node 4 would have to download the entire file again to get back to work. That’s a massive waste of bandwidth.
But in Walrus, Node 4 can talk to its neighbors. Because Walrus uses this 2D grid, Node 4 only needs to collect a tiny amount of data from other nodes to "math" its way back to its original state.
It’s like if you lost a piece of a crossword puzzle, but you could reconstruct the missing word just by looking at the letters that cross through it. That is the efficiency of Walrus.
"Efficiency isn't just about speed; it's about the intelligence of the system. Walrus doesn't work harder; it works smarter."
How a "Write" Happens in the Walrus World
Actually, the way Walrus handles a new piece of data is pretty cool to see in action. It’s a process built on radical transparency and mathematical certainty.
When you want to store something on Walrus, you (the "Writer") become the architect.
The Encoding: You take your blob of data and perform the Red Stuff 2D-encoding. You create those primary and secondary slivers we talked about. The Commitments: This is where the trust comes in. For every sliver, Walrus computes a "commitment." Think of this as a digital fingerprint. If even one bit of data changes, the fingerprint won't match. The Handshake: You send the slivers to the nodes. But you don't just send the data; you send the commitments too. Each node in the Walrus network checks its specific sliver against the commitment. The Consensus: Once a node is happy, it signs off. When you get enough signatures (2f + 1, for the math nerds out there), Walrus generates a certificate.
This certificate is then posted on-chain. It is a public, unchangeable promise that your data is safe within the Walrus network.
Honestly, it’s a beautiful dance. The writer doesn't have to keep re-sending data forever. Once those signatures are collected, the Walrus protocol takes over. Even if the writer disappears the next second, the data lives on.
The "Referees": Security and Rewards
One of the most common questions we get is: "Why would anyone want to store data for Walrus?"
It’s a fair question. Storing data takes electricity, hardware, and time. In the Walrus philosophy, trust isn't given; it's built through incentives.
The nodes in the Walrus network aren't doing this out of the goodness of their hearts. They are part of a robust economic system. They act as the network's referees.
If a node does its job—if it keeps its slivers safe and responds quickly to read requests—it gets rewarded. But here’s the kicker: because of the 2D-encoding, Walrus can prove if a node is lying.
If a node tries to serve "fake" data, the commitments (those digital fingerprints we mentioned) will immediately flag it. The rest of the Walrus network will see the mismatch. In this way, Walrus creates a self-healing, self-policing environment.
It’s real security. Not the kind of security that relies on a "Terms of Service" agreement, but the kind of security that relies on the laws of mathematics.
"In a world of uncertainty, Walrus provides the one thing we all crave: a guarantee that doesn't depend on a human's word."
Reading from Walrus: Speed Meets Accuracy
Storing data is only half the battle. You also need to get it back.
Reading from Walrus is designed to be as seamless as possible. When a "Reader" wants to find a file, they don't need to talk to every single node.
They start by checking the on-chain certificate. This tells them what the "blob commitment" should be. Then, they ask the nodes for the primary slivers.
The reader only needs to collect a fraction of the slivers (f + 1) to reconstruct the entire file. Once they have those pieces, they decode them, re-run the math, and check it against the original commitment.
If it matches? Success. You have your file.
If it doesn’t? The reader knows exactly which node sent bad data and can ignore it.
Walrus makes sure that even if a third of the network is having a bad day (or being intentionally difficult), your data still comes home to you.
The Self-Healing Miracle
Let’s go back to our friend Node 4 who went offline. This is where Walrus really shines as a storyteller.
In a traditional system, Node 4 is a liability. In Walrus, Node 4 is just a temporary gap that the rest of the family helps fill.
When Node 4 comes back online and realizes it’s missing its data, it doesn't panic. It reaches out to its peers—say, Node 1 and Node 3.
Intersection: Node 1 and Node 3 don't send Node 4 their entire data sets. That would be too much. Instead, they only send the tiny "intersections" where their rows and columns meet Node 4's missing pieces. Recovery: Node 4 takes these tiny fragments and uses the Walrus encoding rules to "re-grow" its secondary sliver. Completion: Once the secondary sliver is back, Node 4 can use it to reconstruct its primary sliver.
It’s like a lizard regrowing a tail. The Walrus network is a living organism. It’s decentralized, yes, but it’s also deeply connected. Every node supports the whole, and the whole supports every node.
Why Walrus Matters for the Future
We are entering an era of AI, massive media, and decentralized finance. The "old" way of storing things—on a central server owned by a billion-dollar company—is becoming a bottleneck.
We need a system that can handle the "Red Stuff"—the faults, the churn, and the scale of the future.
Walrus is that system.
It’s actually pretty cool when you think about it. By using 2D-encoding, Walrus has solved the "Recovery Problem" that has plagued decentralized storage for years. It has made it cheap to be resilient. It has made it easy to be secure.
But beyond the math and the slivers, Walrus represents a shift in how we relate to the digital world. It’s about moving from "renting" to "owning."
When you put your data on Walrus, you aren't asking a company for a favor. You are placing your information into a protocol that is mathematically incapable of forgetting you.
"The future isn't something that happens to us; it's something we build. And we are building it on Walrus."
Final Thoughts: The Heavy Lifter
The name Walrus was chosen for a reason.
In nature, a walrus is a creature of immense strength, capable of thriving in the harshest environments. It is steady. It is resilient. It is a "heavy lifter."
The Walrus protocol is no different. It is designed to carry the weight of the internet's data without breaking a sweat. It handles the "churn" of the world with a calm, mathematical grace.
Whether you are a developer looking for a place to host your dApp, a creator wanting to preserve your art, or just someone who believes the internet should be more open—Walrus is built for you.
It’s real. It’s here. And it’s changing the game.
The digital world might be heavy, but with Walrus, we finally have the shoulders to carry it.
$WAL #Walrus @WalrusProtocol

You know how it is when you upload a file to the cloud and just assume it stays there because you are paying for it. I used to think the same way about decentralized storage until I started digging into how Walrus actually keeps the nodes honest. It is one thing to say your data is safe on a bunch of different computers but it is another thing entirely to make sure those people are not just pretending to keep your files to collect a paycheck.
I realized that the biggest problem with this kind of tech is laziness. If a storage node can get away with deleting your data to save space while still telling the network they have it they probably will. To stop this Walrus uses something called a challenge protocol which is basically a surprise inspection that happens all the time.
"If a node can get paid for doing nothing they will eventually stop doing the work."
I was reading through the rules and found out that at the end of every epoch which is just a set period of time the system picks random files that each node has to prove they still have. It is not like they can just send back a thumbs up or a simple yes. They have to provide a specific mathematical proof that they are holding the actual pieces of the file they were assigned.
The cool part is how they handle the randomness because if a node knew which files were going to be checked they could just keep those and delete everything else. They use a random coin that everyone agrees on and it dictates which blobs of data get tested. If a node fails this test they do not just get a slap on the wrist. They actually lose their stake which means their money gets burned and disappears forever.
"Burning the penalties is the only way to make sure nobody is lying for profit."
One thing that surprised me is how the network handles these challenges without breaking. There is a version of the protocol that is fully asynchronous which means it does not rely on everyone's clocks being perfectly in sync. When the challenge starts the nodes actually stop answering some read requests for a moment to focus on the proof. This sounds like a pain for the user but it ensures that a sneaky node cannot just borrow the data from a neighbor at the last second to pass the test.
I noticed that they are starting with a slightly relaxed version for the main launch to keep things fast. They assume the network will stay mostly on time so that reads stay snappy. It feels like a fair trade because as a consumer I want my files immediately but I also want to know the nodes are actually working.
"Storage is only as good as the proof that it actually exists."
The way we get our data back is also pretty interesting. Walrus is built to be a storage powerhouse first and a delivery service second. They expect nodes to give us our data for free because it makes the whole system look good but there is no strict rule forcing them to be fast. This is what people call a public goods problem. If everyone expects someone else to do the heavy lifting of sending data eventually nobody might do it.
To fix this I saw that we have a few options as users. We can make direct deals with nodes for faster service or we can even put up a bounty. If I really need a file and the nodes are being slow I can put a little bit of money on the chain as a reward. The first nodes to bring me my data get the prize. It is a bit like calling a premium ride share when the bus is taking too long.
"The system stays alive because the cost of cheating is higher than the cost of honest work."
I like that they do not just give the slashed money to other nodes because that would give people a reason to report their neighbors even if they were doing nothing wrong. By burning the money they keep the incentives clean. It reminds me of how some big blockchain networks handle fees to keep everything stable.
It is funny because as a user I do not usually think about what happens behind the scenes when I click download. I just want my photo or my document to appear. But knowing that there is this constant cycle of challenges and proofs makes me feel a lot better about moving my important stuff there. It is not just a pinky promise that my data is safe. It is a mathematical certainty backed by people who stand to lose a lot of money if they let me down.
"Real security is not about trusting people but about making it impossible for them to lie."

At the end, I just want a place where my digital life can live without me worrying if the company behind it is going to go bust or if the server is going to get wiped. Walrus feels like a system that treats my data with the seriousness it deserves by constantly questioning the people who hold it. It is a bit of a tough love approach to storage but it is exactly what we need if we are going to move away from the old way of doing things.
what you think about this? don't forget to comment 💭
Follow for more content 🙂
#Walrus @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL

Вчора ввечері я сидів за столом і намагався зрозуміти, де насправді мають зберігатися всі мої цифрові фото та робочі файли. Знаєте, як це буває, коли раптом усвідомлюєш, що «хмара» — це зовсім не хмара, а просто чийсь чужий комп’ютер, за який ти платиш щомісяця. Я почав вивчати Walrus, бо хотів чогось більш постійного, що не виглядало б як чергова пастка з місячною підпискою.
Мені знадобився певний час, щоб розібратися в їхній системі оплати, бо вона зовсім не схожа на типовий рахунок за кредитною карткою. Я зрозумів: використовуючи цю систему, я не просто орендую папку — я фактично купую конкретний сегмент мережі на певний проміжок часу.

Спочатку це дивне відчуття — думати про сховище як про фізичний ресурс, яким можна володіти або торгувати. Я дізнався, що в блокчейні Sui ці речі називаються «ресурсами зберігання» (storage resources), і вони мають чітку дату початку та завершення. Ви просто кажете системі, скільки місця вам потрібно і на скільки місяців чи років. Виявилося, що я навіть можу розділити ці ресурси або перепродати їх, якщо передумаю. Це більше схоже на володіння ділянкою землі, ніж на оренду шафки у спортзалі.
> «Сховище в мережі має бути ресурсом, яким ви володієте, а не послугою, яку ви орендуєте».
>
Як формується ціна
Те, як визначається ціна, стає дуже цікавим, якщо копнути глибше. Можна подумати, що є якийсь «бос», який встановлює тариф, але насправді за це голосують люди, які тримають сервери. Кожен з них подає свою пропозицію: яку ціну він вважає справедливою і який обсяг даних може обробити. Система аналізує всі ці голоси та обирає ціну, з якою згодна більшість. Це схоже на те, як компанія друзів обирає ресторан для вечері, зупиняючись на варіанті, що підходить під бюджет більшості.
Я хвилювався, що ціна може змінитися вже після того, як я завантажу свої файли. Але насправді, як тільки ви купуєте ресурс зберігання, ціна фіксується. Ви платите наперед і не переймаєтеся тим, що токени подорожчають або провайдери стануть жадібними наступного місяця. Мені подобається знати, що мої файли в безпеці на наступні два роки, і мені не потрібно перевіряти пошту, очікуючи сповіщення про підвищення тарифів. Це дає спокій, якого просто не отримаєш від традиційних техгігантів.
> «Передоплата за ваш цифровий простір захищає вас від примх мінливого ринку».
>
Депозити та відповідальність
Один момент спочатку мене збентежив — це депозит при записі даних. Коли я завантажую файл, я плачу трохи більше у вигляді застави, яку можна повернути. Згодом я зрозумів: це спосіб системи заохотити мене бути «хорошим сусідом». Якщо я сам відправляю свої дані в усі різні частини мережі, це допомагає системі працювати швидше. Коли я це роблю, частина депозиту повертається мені. Це як застава за скляну пляшку, яку ти отримуєш назад, коли здаєш її на переробку.
Іноді я замислююся: а що, якщо люди, які тримають сервери, просто підуть або вимкнуть свої машини? У системі діють правила, за якими вони зобов’язані виконувати свої обіцянки. Якщо вони спробують видалити дані або перестануть підтверджувати їх наявність, їх штрафують. Вони ризикують власними грошима, бо мають виставити свої токени як гарантію. Мені спокійніше від думки, що для них є реальна ціна за лінощі або недбалість щодо моїх даних.
> «Мережа працює лише тоді, коли ті, хто тримає дані, мають втратити більше, ніж ви».
>
Погляд у майбутнє
Я помітив, що можу продовжити термін зберігання, якщо він добігає кінця. Це простий процес оновлення, який дозволяє залишити дані там, де вони є, без необхідності їх переносити. Вони навіть дозволяють побачити майбутні ціни заздалегідь, щоб ви могли планувати. Звісно, система ще не ідеальна — платити за два роки вперед може бути відчутно для гаманця. Я чув, що в майбутньому це можуть змінити, щоб зробити оплату зручнішою, але поки що це працює так.
Робота з Walrus схожа на участь у великому експерименті про те, як ми оцінюємо наше цифрове життя. Ми настільки звикли отримувати речі «безкоштовно» в обмін на нашу приватність або вічно платити за те, чим ніколи не володіємо. Ця технологія змусила мене усвідомити: я хочу більше контролю. Я хочу точно знати, де мої файли і скільки вони коштуватимуть мені протягом наступних років. Це трохи складніше, ніж просто натиснути кнопку в сервісі великої корпорації, але це здається більш чесним.
> «Справжнє володіння даними вимагає системи, яка не може змінити правила гри посеред процесу».
>
Зрештою, я просто хочу знати, що мої фото п’ятирічної давнини будуть на місці ще через п’ять років. Я не хочу залежати від компанії, яка може видалити мій акаунт або вдвічі підняти ціни. Навіть враховуючи необхідність навчання та витрати наперед, я вважаю, що цей компроміс того вартий. Йдеться про створення стабільного та справедливого фундаменту. Я починаю бачити, що це не просто про сховище — це про побудову кращого способу життя в інтернеті.
> «Ми рухаємося до світу, де наші цифрові сліди належать багатьом, а не кільком обраним».
>
Мені справді цікаво подивитися, як з часом розвиватиметься вторинний ринок цих «часток сховища». Було б круто побачити, як люди торгують простором, як будь-яким іншим активом. А поки що я просто радий мати місце для своїх даних, яке здається безпечним і передбачуваним. Це робить цифровий світ трохи схожим на реальний — де речі мають своє місце та цінність, яка має сенс.
$WAL #Walrus @WalrusProtocol

Якось пізно ввечері я сидів перед екраном і намагався зрозуміти чи варто мені залишатися зі своїми старими токенами чи все ж таки зробити цей крок у невідоме. Я вже досить довго тримав TVK і тут почув про цей перехід на Vanar. Це був один із тих моментів коли ти маєш вирішити чи залишаєшся ти в минулому чи хочеш побачити куди рухається майбутнє.
Чому я вирішив залишитися з Vanar на довгу дистанцію.
Ви знаєте як це буває коли проєкт змінює назву і ти мимоволі починаєш думати чи не намагаються вони щось приховати. Спочатку я був налаштований скептично бо перехід з одного токена на інший завжди звучить як купа зайвої роботи для звичайної людини. Але потім я подивився на те як ця математика насправді працює для нас.
Загальна кількість нових токенів встановлена на рівні два цілих чотири мільярди. Це звучить як величезне число але половина з цього була призначена саме для тих людей які вже володіли старими токенами. Я зрозумів що якщо у мене був один старий токен я отримаю один новий токен через простий обмін один до одного.
Цей перехід не коштував мені жодних додаткових грошей і це принесло полегшення. Я терпіти не можу коли проєкти намагаються витиснути більше грошей з людей які підтримували їх з самого початку. Це було схоже на те ніби мені просто оновили двигун у машині якою я вже володію.
"Цей обмін є лише містком до значно більшої гри."
Я витратив деякий час на вивчення планів щодо іншої половини токенів бо саме тут зазвичай починаються проблеми. Часто можна побачити як величезний шматок іде засновникам або на якийсь таємничий гаманець команди який потім просто розпродає все іншим. Я шукав цей підвох але так і не зміг його знайти.
Натомість я побачив що вони повертають майже всі нові токени в руки людей які фактично підтримують роботу мережі. Близько вісімдесяти трьох відсотків цього нового запасу заблоковано спеціально для винагород валідаторів. Це означає що люди які гарантують безпеку системи отримують основну вигоду.
Тринадцять відсотків іде на розробку і зовсім невелика частина призначена для спільноти. Найбільш дивовижним для мене було те що в цій новій партії взагалі не було виділено токенів для команди. Це майже нечувано в цій сфері де кожен шукає миттєвої вигоди.
"Відсутність токенів у команди означає що вони мають працювати так само важко як і ми."
Я почав вивчати цю екосистему щоб зрозуміти як це бути частиною мережі. Це не просто тримати цифровий гаманець і чекати поки цифри підуть угору. Ви насправді можете голосувати за те хто стане валідатором.
Валідатор це просто розумне слово для людей які перевіряють транзакції та стежать щоб ніхто нікого не обдурив. У багатьох інших проєктах це робиться за зачиненими дверима великими компаніями з мільйонами доларів. Тут я відчув що у мене справді є право голосу.
Коли я голосую за валідатора я фактично кажу що довіряю цій людині підтримувати роботу мережі. Якщо вони добре справляються вони отримують винагороди за блоки які мережа дає за виконану роботу. Потім спеціальний контракт автоматично ділиться цими винагородами з людьми які за них голосували.
"Довіра це єдина валюта яка насправді тримає мережу живою."
Мені подобається що всім цим займається контракт а не людина. Контракт це просто частина коду яка виконує правила без зайвих емоцій чи жадібності. Він гарантує що якщо я беру участь я отримую свою справедливу частку і мені не потрібно ні в кого просити дозволу.
Це створює дивне відчуття спільної власності якого я не відчував у багатьох інших проєктах. Зазвичай я просто клієнт але тут я відчуваю себе частиною інфраструктури. Я допомагаю вирішувати хто керує процесом і отримую за це невелику плату за свою увагу та довіру.
"Автоматизована справедливість краща за обіцянки будь якої людини."
Весь процес отримання винагород досить простий як тільки ви в ньому розберетеся. Ви стейкаєте свої токени що означає що ви їх тимчасово фіксуєте щоб показати свої серйозні наміри. Потім ви обираєте своїх улюблених валідаторів і чекаєте поки винагороди почнуть капати у ваш гаманець.
Це не схема швидкого збагачення і ніхто не обіцяє мені приватний острів до наступного вівторка. Це більше схоже на повільне та стабільне зростання яке походить від того що ти приносиш користь мережі. Я зрозумів що чим більше людей бере участь тим сильнішою стає вся система для кожного з нас.
Те як вони налаштували розподіл показує що вони хочуть щоб люди залишалися тут на роки а не на дні. Зосередившись так сильно на валідаторах вони переконуються що фундамент міцний перш ніж намагатися будувати решту будинку. Це приємна зміна темпу порівняно з тими циклами хайпу які я бачу зазвичай.
"Справжня цінність походить від людей які вирішують залишитися."
Я все ще тут бо така прозорість дає мені відчуття спокою. Я точно знаю куди йдуть токени і знаю що команда не просто чекає моменту щоб усе кинути. Це схоже на проєкт побудований для людей які насправді користуються технологіями а не просто торгують ними.
Зрештою я залишився з Vanar бо це здалося мені чесною угодою. Я отримав свої токени один до одного і отримав право голосу в тому як мережа розвивається. Приємно бути частиною чогось де правила чіткі а винагороди діляться з людьми які насправді роблять справу.
$VANRY #Vanar @Vanar