Cryptopolitan

TAC Protocol’s attempt to explain away a trading session where its TAC token lost around 90% of its value has stirred skepticism from holders after the project’s July 8 statement on X ruled out any exploit and also denied any foul play in the form of insider selling too, pinning the collapse on forced selling in the futures market.
However, onchain researchers have presented a conflicting theory, saying the chain of transactions tells a different story as fingers point to a coordinated exit by 18 wallets.
What is the TAC team’s explanation of the events?
“The protocol operates exactly as designed,” the TAC account wrote, adding that the network “was not hacked in any form” and that onchain assets stayed secure.
The team stated, “The decline was a liquidation cascade triggered initially by a large perpetual futures sell order exceeding the relatively thin liquidity on the market.”
The team also stated that neither its own holdings nor those of early investors moved because both remain under vesting locks.
To restore confidence, TAC stated that they are focused on strengthening their market structure and deepening liquidity, though it disclosed no specifics.
Were insiders selling TAC?
Although they stopped short of pointing the finger at people with connections to TAC Protocol, a July 8 post by onchain analyst EmberCN counted 18 wallets offloading about 372 million TAC and walking away with 1.78 million USD1.
The tokens were moved off TAC’s native chain onto BNB Chain first, where they were sold. By EmberCN’s measure, the price fell 91%, from about $0.05 to $0.0045.
EmberCN stated, “This coin bears a striking resemblance in onchain dumping tactics to $SIREN from a month ago and $AKE from yesterday—it’s highly likely they’re all being manipulated by the same ‘conspiracy syndicate.’”
What are TAC Protocol’s numbers now?
The protocol’s native token, TAC, was trading around $0.065 at the end of June but now trades around $0.0026, a decline of around 96%.
It has a market cap over $12.2 million, and DefiLlama put its total value locked on the TAC chain at around $1.27 million.
This is not TAC’s first violent week, as the token had already dropped about 82% in a day, roughly two months after a $2.8 million bridge exploit on May 11 that the team reclassified as a white-hat incident once the attacker returned about 90% of the funds.
TAC reopened cross-chain transfers between TON and its own network on June 10.
Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Asia’s ongoing repression of cryptocurrency prediction markets is channeling investment, liquidity, and innovation to Western nations that opted for regulation.
In a report dated July 8, the Web3 research firm Tiger Research suggested that the characterization of prediction markets as unlawful gambling is hindering Asian countries from enjoying a thriving blockchain market. Instead of stopping demand, the legal constraints merely push users and business transactions onto international platforms and diminish consumer safety.
The growth of the sphere has been fueled by crypto-native platforms like Polymarket, where trades are settled on-chain. Tiger Research estimates that the volume of trade exceeds $14 billion every month; moreover, the leaders in the industry have an overall value of $40 billion.
According to the report, Prediction markets sell contracts that pay $1 if an event takes place and $0 if it does not; thus, predictions become real-time estimates of probabilities. Academic research has found these markets can produce informative forecasts. Meta’s reported Arena project is an example of the growing interest in this technology beyond crypto.
Asia keeps reaching for the ban hammer
The crypto prediction markets are mostly thought of by authorities across the Asian continent as illegal forms of gambling.
In January 2025, the Singapore Gambling Regulatory Authority took censorship actions against the Polymarket platform due to it being regarded as an unlicensed gambling website. Additionally, the usage of the platform was restricted across Taiwan during the 2024 presidential elections when users were punished for violating the election laws. In Thailand, the usage of the platform was later also deemed illegal when internet service providers were ordered to censor it, while China continues its long-standing ban on all gambling and cryptocurrency platforms.
At present, Polymarket has also expanded the list of countries where its platform is not available to include the nations of Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Myanmar, North Korea, Singapore, Syria, Taiwan, Thailand, and Yemen. Users in Singapore, Taiwan, and Thailand are only allowed to close their positions in Polymarket as the platform does not allow them to place new bets.
The tendency of regulators to crack down upon crypto prediction markets continues throughout Asia. As indicated by Interexy, a company that specializes in blockchain development, India prohibited real-money online gaming in 2025, stating that the prohibition follows the actions taken against the opinion-trading platform Probo, which operates domestically.
The Philippines had also canceled the licenses for offshore gambling operations, Hong Kong warned that crypto prediction markets can be treated as illegal gambling, Indonesia froze more than 33,000 gambling-linked accounts, and Vietnam banned illegal gambling apps from app stores. Interexy concluded that regulators continue applying decades-old gambling laws instead of developing dedicated rules for crypto prediction markets.
Nonetheless, the demand continues to be robust. According to Chosun Daily, a South Korean betting exchange known as Opinion has surpassed a remarkable 2 trillion-won mark in its weekly trading volume since its inception, despite the stringent measures imposed by the country’s gambling regulations, highlighting that the regulations do not prevent gamblers from engaging in such activities and merely push them elsewhere.
The West chose to regulate, and cashed in
For the West, the course took a turn, and the difference is apparent in the money. Instead of completely prohibiting prediction markets, U.S. authorities have allowed regulated event contracts to coexist with crypto exchanges. As estimated by blockchain intelligence company TRM Labs, transaction volumes in prediction markets were around $1.2 billion per month at the beginning of 2025 and increased to over $20 billion in January 2026, with approximately 840,000 active wallets involved.
Polymarket and Kalshi have paved the way for the expansion. Kalshi functions as a designated contract market under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. This particular status allowed its partners such as CNN and Robinhood to gain significant acceptance of event-type financial contracts.
Regulatory measures did not stop many experts from voicing their concerns. Former SEC Commissioner Joseph Grundfest cautioned that highly specific event contracts can make inside trading feasible and argued that Polymarket does not have anti-money laundering or know-your-customer regulations that are mandatory for financial markets in the US.
Similarly, distressed-asset investor Thomas Braziel called prediction markets “sports gambling wrapped in finance.” In addition, he warned that it is a matter of time before venture capital starts regretting its investments because of the high level of regulatory uncertainty. Regulators in the US also called to tighten oversight in the wake of the insider- trading scandal involving event-driven contracts.
Currently, the legal conversation in the United States focuses on whether federal commodities laws take precedence over state gambling regulations. This issue may eventually reach the Supreme Court, according to Grundfest. In Asia, however, the competitive implications are already showing.
Tiger Research states that relying on gambling prohibitions may lead to a loss of capital, liquidity, and innovations as other regions adopt regulated prediction-market frameworks. As Western markets refine their regulatory regimes, Asian countries are under more pressure to figure out if their existing gambling laws are still the best way of overseeing one of the fastest-growing industries in the crypto space.
The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

The number of new exchange listings declined for another month in June, moving down from their peak in September 2025. More projects are delaying token launches, while exchange liquidity continues to decline.
New token listings on CEXs became another signal of slowing crypto sentiment. In June, new listings sank to the lowest level in two years, as appetite for new assets diminished.
Monthly listing activity is now down by over 77% since the last quarter of 2025, as the decline in listings continued for the past nine months.
In the past months, token trading slowed down as the altcoin market also slowed down to multi-year lows. The recent token listings data is also seen as another indicator of a potential market bottom, as token-based projects usually wait for bull markets and higher risk appetite.
Why are token-based projects delaying listings?
The token listing market declined for the third consecutive quarter. According to Cryptoquant, only 351 new projects were listed in Q2, down from 537 projects in Q1, a 35% drop. Token-based projects closed their worst quarter in two years.
New token listings on CEXs declined for several reasons. Some new assets only traded on DEXs or perpetual futures markets.
Overall interest in tokens was also displaced by tokenized securities and the occasional airdrop or meme launch.
Token trading also slowed down as market participants remained more skeptical of unlocks and controlled supply. A larger number of listings was also not seen as a source of guaranteed returns.
New token listings for high-profile projects often chose Binance, but the bulk of new tokens were listed on Mexc. The exchange still holds its position as the leader in new listings, but the overall trend shows an outflow of new projects and liquidity.
Most exchanges also saw significant outflows of liquidity in June. Binance lost nearly $2.5B in liquidity, with a significant withdrawal trend for stablecoins. Close to $1B flowed out of OKX and Bybit. The only exchange with positive inflows was Robinhood, which recently started drawing volumes to its newly launched chain.
New tokens in Q2 faced bear market headwinds
For the tokens that chose Q2 to launch, return on investment was limited. New assets battled for shrinking liquidity and a shift to perpetual futures markets or real-world assets.
The success of token listings depended on the exchange rules, where more selective markets had more positive price moves and higher general returns. Cryptorank data shows some high-profile listings achieve short-term success, though overall, the majority of new listings were in the red.
Most new token listings were in the red, even for leading centralized exchanges. | Source: Cryptorank
Upbit achieved the biggest returns for new projects, with three profitable and five unprofitable listings in Q2. OKX and Binance followed with similar return rates. MEXC listed 153 tokens, but most of the new additions underperformed.
The last few months showed that new tokens could not rely on hype for drawing in liquidity. In 2026, projects are vetted for their ownership structure, as well as for signs of real activity and fee generation. Token-based projects also no longer rely on constant asset appreciation, but try to attract users with fee sharing and token burns.
If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Centralized exchanges are moving away from speculative narratives and toward tokens with demonstrated utility. An analysis of over 10,000 listings across the 10 major exchanges, Binance, Bybit, OKX, Bitget, Gate, MEXC, KuCoin, HTX, Kraken, and Crypto.com, shows blockchain infrastructure, DeFi, and tokenized real-world assets displacing meme and GameFi tokens at the top of exchange listing activity in the first half of 2026. The shift marks a break from the two prior cycles, in which listing pipelines were dominated by crypto-native, hype-driven categories.
In Q2 2026, exchanges shifted listings toward blockchain infrastructure (64 listings) and DeFi (46 listings) tokens over speculative assets, reflecting a broader move toward projects with demonstrated utility. Tokenized assets, covering equities, commodities, and real-world assets, ranked third with 42 listings as exchanges sought exposure to TradFi instruments.
Source: CryptoRank API
Beneath that leaderboard, the speculative end of the market lost momentum. Meme and GameFi, the two categories that had defined the previous hype cycle, both saw their new listings fall quarter after quarter from their 2024-2025 peaks.
Taken together, the shift points to a more selective market, where exchanges leaning toward projects tied to real usage rather than the meme speculation that defined the previous cycle.
CEX Listing Category Share: State of 2025 vs H1 2026
The biggest shift in exchange listing activity was a switch towards Tokenized Assets, which became the most-listed category in H1 2026. In H1 2026, nearly every 5th listed token was a tokenized asset. By contrast, in 2025, less than 7% of listings were tokenized assets.
Source: CryptoRank API
The growth was driven primarily by tokenized stocks. Most new listings came from a small number of issuers, including xStocks, bStocks, and Ondo’s tokenized markets. This represents a clear shift from the Meme tokens that dominated the previous cycle, with exchanges increasingly listing tokenized versions of traditional financial assets.
Meme Listings Return to Pre-Memecraze Levels
Memecoin listings have declined for six consecutive quarters. In Q4 2024 exchanges listed 196 memecoins, but in Q2 2026 there were only 41 new listings in this category. which is a 79% decline from the peak. This is the lowest quarterly total since Q3 2023, before the memecoin craze began.
Source: CryptoRank API
GameFi Listings Down 84% Since the Q2 2024 Peak
GameFi was one of the leading listing narratives throughout 2023 and 2024. However, listings in this category are down 84% from their peak 2 years ago, reaching just 15 new listings in Q2 2026. This suggests the lowest interest in GameFi tokens since Q3 2023, when only 10 tokens were listed across analyzed exchanges.
Source: CryptoRank API
Listings and category share point in the same direction: exchanges are rewarding categories with an external, real-world anchor over those that depend on internal crypto narrative cycles. Whether this reflects a lasting reallocation of exchange risk appetite or a temporary lull between speculative cycles will depend on whether tokenized assets can sustain the growth rate they showed in H1 2026 once the current wave of issuers, xStocks, bStocks, and Ondo among them, is joined by others.

A federal court has denied a request to suspend Tennessee’s new ban on crypto ATMs, which is an early legal blow to the kiosk sector at a time when state governments are moving from imposing restrictions on the devices to outright bans.
Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti announced the ruling on July 7, stating that Public Chapter 766 would continue to be enforceable while a constitutional challenge by CoinFlip operator GPD Holdings LLC and kiosk owner Charles Wernicke is pending. While the court did not rule on the constitutionality of the ban, it determined that the plaintiffs did not meet the high threshold necessary to stop its application before the hearing.
Court lets Tennessee enforce the ban
According to Public Chapter 766, installing, operating, or allowing a virtual currency kiosk anywhere in Tennessee is a Class A offense.
Plaintiffs stated that the law would result in real damage and unlawfully burden interstate commerce. But U.S. District Judge Travis McDonough stated that they were not convincing, concluding that the interest of protecting consumers is stronger than the need for emergency relief required by the plaintiffs. The judge made it clear that he based his ruling on the limited evidence the court had at the preliminary stage, and broader issues of constitutionality would have to wait for further proceedings.
The ruling gives a first glance at the legal issues to be faced during the litigation. Instead of outright rejecting the claims, the court hinted that CoinFlip proved insufficient facts to demonstrate that the law in Tennessee affects interstate commerce, while the Tennessee government relied on legislative conclusions and statistics relating to fraud on the federal level.
“Cryptocurrency ATMs are tools for scammers targeting vulnerable Tennesseans and are rarely used for anything approaching a legitimate purpose,” Skrmetti said after the decision, adding that the legislature acted to protect consumers from increasingly sophisticated fraud schemes.
CoinFlip has objected to this interpretation. In legal documents, CEO Ben Weiss disclosed that the kiosks help clients who use cash, are unbanked, or do not like tying their bank account to cryptocurrency platforms. The firm also insisted that taking away its machines from Tennessee would irreversibly damage its relationship with customers and retail associates it developed over several years.
Tennessee reflects a broader regulatory shift
The Tennessee court ruling arrives at a time when elected officials across the United States are becoming more vocal in establishing regulations pertaining to crypto ATMs.
Indiana was the first state to entirely prohibit their use; since then, states such as Tennessee and Minnesota have followed suit; however, other states have taken a different approach and opted to enact regulations regarding the use of crypto ATMs. According to the American Bankers Association, at least 20 states have different measures in place regarding crypto ATMs, including transaction caps, licensing requirements, and mandatory fraud reimbursement programs.
The debate regarding crypto ATMs has also reached Congress, where Representatives Sean Casten and María Elvira Salazar introduced the bipartisan Stop Crypto ATM Scams Act, stating that the payment kiosks have become a popular means of payment for scams aimed at older people. Casten said that extortionists are able “to prey on seniors” quickly and easily, while Salazar feels that more should be done to protect retirees from scams.
Some elected officials think that stricter regulations may not suffice. For instance, New Jersey Senator Paul Moriarty told The Jersey Vindicator that crypto ATMs have “no legitimate purpose” and that their operators are reaping profits from scammed people.
The changing view on crypto ATMs is directly connected to growing losses from scams. According to the FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center data in 2024, victims lost $247 million in scams related to crypto ATMs, many of whom were older people.
Industry faces mounting legal and commercial pressure
The ruling from the court is increasing the pressure on crypto ATM operators, most of whom face economic difficulties and greater scrutiny from regulators.
In Texas, there were around $56.8 million in losses caused by crypto ATM fraud last year, more than in any other state. Bitcoin Depot, one of the leading companies in the industry, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to huge declines in income. Regulators in multiple states have either initiated lawsuits or introduced new measures against the operators of kiosks.
The industry claims that it is not the machines themselves that generate fraudulent activities. In fact, operators argue that criminals lure unwitting victims into committing unlawful transactions and boast of the use of transaction monitoring, customer identification, and fraud prevention techniques that many companies have put in place.
What comes next
Although Tennessee secured an early courtroom victory, the constitutional fight is far from over.
This decision does not indicate that a statewide crypto ATM ban is constitutional. Rather, it gives Tennessee the right to enforce its law while its constitutionality is being litigated. This may matter for regulators elsewhere—state lawmakers looking to impose stricter measures may see this verdict as a sign that courts could uphold cases of consumer protection laws while constitutionality claims take their course.
For the crypto ATM industry, the litigation has become about more than Tennessee. As lawmakers increasingly question whether kiosks have a place in society or whether they should be controlled with various laws, the CoinFlip case could turn out to be a very significant example when it comes to defining how much states can do when it comes to limiting physical access to digital assets.
If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Robinhood Chain was pitched as the network for RWAs and the place to trade tokenized stocks. On July 8, it did something else entirely. According to data from Dune, the chain drew in $563.9 million in volume on Uniswap, making it the biggest volume day by far since its mainnet launch on July 1.
Source: Dune
That is roughly 10 times the $58.9 million it processed the day before. Uniswap founder Hayden Adams confirmed in a tweet that the volume seen yesterday beat every network except Ethereum mainnet.
Robinhood chain is going absolutely crazy
$500m in 24hr volume on Uniswap – that’s 10x what it did yesterday
And more than any chain other than Ethereum mainnet! pic.twitter.com/wcV70BYqFa
— Hayden Adams 🦄 (@haydenzadams) July 9, 2026
CASHCAT Ran 10x and Dragged the Chain With It
The memecoin called CASHCAT has been the main reason behind the volume spike. The token’s lore is around Robinhood’s old “Cashcat” mascot. The token went up more than 10x within the span of 24 hours with its market cap going over $100 million. That single token dragged the chain’s Uniswap V3 WETH pair from the low tens of millions to $212.3 million in a day.
All of this took place on the day Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev embraced memes and stated in a tweet that the RWA-focused chain “works great for memes too.” Pump.fun added Robinhood Chain support on the same day, letting traders buy in with SOL and skip the bridging friction that usually keeps retail from piling into a new network.
Robinhood tokens are now available to trade on the Pumpfun app!
– No bridging
– Trade seamlessly in SOL
– Trade every trending Robinhood token
Never miss out again, no matter the meta. Only on the Pumpfun app. pic.twitter.com/xWiz0LDVBo
— Pump.fun (@Pumpfun) July 8, 2026
The network’s RWA market cap, in comparison, is at $12.62 million according to DeFiLlama.
At its peak, the memecoin’s market cap was around 8x the size of the tokenized asset market on the chain.
Nearly 16,000 New Tokens Were Created in a Single Day
The activity was not limited to one token. Daily active addresses approached 200,000, and more than 140,000 of those made their first transaction on the chain that day. Nearly 16,000 new tokens were created in 24 hours. Seven memecoins crossed $1 million in market cap.
This is the cascade memecoins tend to set off on a young network. One token runs, the tooling shows up to feed it, wallets and launchpads plug in, and suddenly a chain that measured its activity in tens of millions is clearing more than half a billion. The users arrive for the meme, and the infrastructure follows the users. Robinhood built the rails for equities and watched a cat token fill them.
The Question Is What Happens When CASHCAT Cools
Records like this are easy to celebrate and hard to keep. The volume redefined what Robinhood Chain looks like on paper, a network built for equities now posting numbers that put it near the top of Uniswap. Whether that sticks is a different question.
The open question is conversion. A memecoin can flood a chain with first-time users and new tokens overnight, but those addresses do not automatically become RWA traders. If CASHCAT fades, the 140,000 new wallets and the 16,000 tokens can fade with it, leaving the chain with the same $12.62 million RWA market it started the week with. If even a fraction stay, Robinhood just found a cheaper acquisition funnel than any tokenized-stock pitch was going to hand it.
For now the number stands. What it means depends entirely on July 9 and everything after.
Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Sony Bank has successfully completed its inaugural federal assessment and acquired the necessary permission to manufacture a dollar stablecoin. This is a remarkable progress for the well-known production company in allusion to its ambitions in the field where major manufacturers are trying to exploit the opportunities provided by the system of regulation in US banking.
The approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has implications that extend beyond Tokyo. The fact that Sony has entered the digital currency space means that it is no longer just cryptocurrency companies involved in issuing dollar-pegged cryptocurrency tokens. Circle, Ripple, and Paxos were among the first group of companies to be granted a trust license in December.
Major financial institutions such as Morgan Stanley are also seeking the same licensing arrangements for their own digital-asset arms. The Klaros Group’s director and a former OCC regulator, Roman Goldstein, dubbed the Sony operation the “first commercial-conglomerate ecosystem bank.”
What the OCC actually granted
The regulator did not provide a green signal to conduct business but offered initial provisional approval. Sony Bank, an online lender of Sony Financial Group, stated that the newly formed entity which will be established as a fully-owned subsidiary with $40-million (approx. ¥6.4 billion) initial capital is named as Connectia Trust, National Association. The start of business operations is expected in 2027.
Connectia has been set up for only one purpose; issuance and management of dollar-stable coins. The application for the charter does not include any traditional banking activity such as taking deposits, granting loans or making payments. Additionally, Sony wanted to highlight that no transactions would occur until an acquisition of the needed approvals from the OCC.
“Until all approvals and other authorizations, including the OCC’s final approval, have been obtained, no business activities, including the issuance of stablecoins, will be conducted,” the Company said in a statement.
Because the $40 million commitment exceeds 10% of Sony Financial Group’s capital, the parent had to disclose the plan to Japanese authorities under the country’s Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, Banking Dive noted.
Why Sony wants to be its own issuer
According to the American Banker, Sony already had a way to get into the stablecoin business in December 2025. It partnered with Bastion Platforms of California, which is expected to become the issuer, custodian and reserve keeper of the token once it is launched. Bastion itself is pursuing a conversion application to obtain a national trust charter.
With a charter, Sony’s position changes in the hierarchy. Goldstein stated that this license makes Sony the “issuer of record,” which means that the company obtains direct communication with the regulator and also manages its compliance program. The license also allows receiving income from the reserve assets, which in the future will allow it to become a qualified issuer in compliance with the GENIUS Act. If it lacked such a charter, Goldstein claims that its product would be issued under another company’s license and inherit that company’s regulatory risk.
Evey Guo, a principal of FS Vector, suggests that the charter allows Sony to “control their own destiny.” With the federal charter in hand, the company can manage issuance, custody, transfer and redemption under as single federal supervisor without involvement of any third-party provider and money-transmitter licensee.
The strategic business interest relies on Sony’s own products. According to American Banker, the company intends to use dollar tokens for treasury operations, cross-border payments, and in-app purchases for its entertainment products, such as video games, anime, movies and music, which would help save on payment processing fees through the card networks.
Bankers and consumer advocates push back
Since October 2025, the proposal has been the subject of criticism. The Bank Policy Institute questioned if the charter could violate the long-standing separation of commerce and banking activities. Moreover, the Independent Community Bankers of America warned that the trust lacks deposit insurance, increasing the risk for customers in case of its collapse, and also stated that the OCC’s assumptions were untested for such a large institution.
The National Community Reinvestment Coalition went even further expressing the opinion that approval of Connectia “would create a two-tier system where digital asset firms receive comparable federal status without comparable public obligations, undermining the integrity of the entire chartering framework.”
Nevertheless, the OCC decided to proceed since the interpretation of the current law allows the move. It did attach at least one unusual string: Goldstein noted the regulator may require Sony’s unit to install a full-time, dedicated chief financial officer.
What to watch next
Before it can proceed with issuing anything, Connectia must receive final approval from OCC authorities and approval from Japanese regulators, and there still isn’t a named head from Sony to run it. The 2027 plan is only saved if those approvals happen. Sony is now the testing subject for a market watching if big companies not in finance can get into the US dollar-token system.
Sony Bank has won preliminary conditional approval from the US OCC to set up Connectia Trust, a national trust bank subsidiary built to issue and manage dollar-denominated stablecoins, with a launch targeted for 2027. The move matters to the wider crypto market because it puts a major global conglomerate alongside Circle, Ripple and Paxos in the race for US trust charters, even as banking groups and consumer advocates warn the structure lets stablecoin issuers gain bank-like status without bank-like obligations.
Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

On July 9, the Fair Trade Commission of South Korea (KFTC) approved Mirae Asset Consulting’s acquisition of 92.06% of the cryptocurrency exchange Korbit. This is the first time that a subsidiary of a significant Korean financial institution has been permitted to buy a licensed digital asset exchange.
For the rest of the world, which is keenly observing how conventional finance is moving towards cryptocurrency, this ruling represents a real trial for the acceptance of that merger.
Regulators in the US, Europe and Asia spent years considering how banks and asset management companies would be able to operate exchanges. South Korea has demonstrated one approach to make use of and did not have to break down the barriers between finance and cryptocurrency.
Mirae Asset Consulting is paying 133.4 billion won for the acquisition (equivalent to $97.9 million based on Bank of Korea’s exchange rates on July 9). The company purchased 26.9 million shares of Korbit, as stated in the regulatory filing.
Why the regulator said yes
The KFTC based its case for approval on the fact that Korbit is a minor player in the market. The commission informed that Korbit is the fourth in the country of five licensed exchanges operating using the technology of exchange trading with won. The platform saw the trading volume of the year equal to only 0.5%. Also, it is widely known that Upbit accounts for 69% of trading volume; Bithumb reaches about 28%; Coinone has about 2%; and Gopax is close to 0.1%, as reported by Bloomingbit.
Thus, the Commission ruled that the deal will not cause harmful effects on the market. The commission explained that it studied two risks: whether it is possible to create a stock-and-crypto platform that will make difficult for competitors to access the securities market and whether it is realistic to set up a crypto-exchange traded fund that will push rivals in asset management. The regulator concluded that these risks could occur only in the case of Korbit enjoying much more liquidity.
“For concerns such as the exclusion of competing businesses in the securities and asset management markets to actually materialize, Korbit must have sufficient liquidity,” a commission official said, according to Chosunbiz, adding that “at the current level, it is insufficient to cause anticompetitive effects.”
A workaround, not a rewrite
In Korea, there is a regulation that prohibits banks, insurance companies, and securities firms that are regulated from participating in cryptocurrency transactions, which was the approach that Mirae Asset applied in executing this transaction.
The buyer is a firm called Mirae Asset Consulting, which is an organization not in the financial sector that generates its revenue from hotel operations, and not from any of the various activities related to investment securities or other financial activities conducted by the group.
Structure is important to anybody viewing the deal as a precedent. Mirae Asset didn’t manage to secure the approval of its financial subsidiary to own the exchange but employed a non-financial company to hold the asset to assure that the separation principle was preserved, which is a difference highlighted by KFTC when it called this precedent the first case of a financial entity subsidiary acquiring a digital asset exchange.
According to a report from Ledger Insights, the sellers are NXC, which is the holding firm of game maker Nexon, and SK Square. Meanwhile, it looks like Bitstamp, which is owned by Robinhood, retains the other 8 percent stake in Korbit. This stake is in line with Mirae Asset Group’s goal of building digital asset and wallet infrastructure outside of Korea.
What it signals for the wider market
The purchase slots into a strategy Mirae Asset has branded as “Mirae Asset 3.0,” a plan its securities arm announced this year to fold digital assets into a traditional finance business. The ownership of the exchange infrastructure gives the company a licensed base from where to explore the world of tokenized securities and crypto ETFs.
KFTC defined the outcome as a stimulus, rather than a threat to the industry. “We hope competition in the digital asset market will be invigorated through a reshaping of the digital finance market and service innovation,” it said, according to DigitalToday.
Only time will tell if the reshaping of the market will remain confined to Korea. The consolidation process has already begun since Coinone is currently seeking for a buyer, according to a CoinMarketCap report. A licensed exchange now located among one of the biggest banking conglomerates in South Korea acts like a new indicator for international financial institutions that are still contemplating how to invest in cryptocurrencies through legal means.



If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Binance, which makes up about 39% of the overall spot trading volume for cryptocurrencies in the month of May, may become harder for investigators to depend on in the near future.
The Information, which looked over an internal memo from the US Department of Justice (DOJ), stated that prosecutors dealing with cases regarding cryptocurrency were informed in June that cooperation from Binance may be less than wanted. It has been said that Binance intends to add conditions before fulfilling requests regarding freezing and seizing customer assets.
This raises concerns for the digital asset industry as a whole. Being the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the world, Binance has proven to be an essential ally in the pursuit of tracking, freezing, and recovering illicit digital assets that were obtained by way of hacking, ransomware, violating sanctions, and fraud. Any decrease in the willingness to cooperate voluntarily is bound to draw the investigations and retrieval of the assets to a halt.
The memorandum was reportedly written by Rachel Jones, who serves as DOJ digital currency counsel, and then disseminated among the people dealing directly with cryptocurrency cases. It also included copies of the memo for some high-level employees, including Kevin Mosley who was involved in the investigations of Binance in 2023.
Binance contest this interpretation of events, with its spokesperson saying:
There has been and will be no change to Binance’s cooperation with U.S. law enforcement.
In a different interview with BeInCrypto, the company’s head of corporate communications stated that the DOJ officials seem to have misinterpreted Binance’s responsibilities under the Abu Dhabi licensing structure and that the company has reached out to both the DOJ and Abu Dhabi officials to clear the matter.
The Abu Dhabi wrinkle
The cause of the misunderstanding, according to Binance, is the license which the company received from the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) where regulation started on Jan. 5, 2026.
According to the official guidance from the ADGM Office of Data Protection, the exemption allowing for necessary disclosures “would not extend to cover requests from law enforcement agencies outside of the UAE.”
If read narrowly, it may mean requiring international authorities to submit requests in accordance with the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLTA) rather than relying on the voluntary cooperation of Binance for immediate asset freezing.
However, the provided guidance allows for transfers needed for the “establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims (including judicial, administrative, regulatory and out-of-court procedures).”
The guidance even gives an example of said provision with reference to the request of a US regulator. Binance insists that this allows the company to continue its cooperation with American law enforcement while still complying with the privacy laws of the UAE, saying:
“We are not going to change in any way, shape or form, the way that we interact with law enforcement in America.”
The firm’s head of corporate communications stated to BeInCrypto that the firm is expanding its cooperation with the DOJ, not decreasing it.
Why voluntary help carries weight now
This issue has taken on greater importance because many of the supervision procedures that were put in place following Binance’s landmark settlement in 2023 have been relaxed significantly.
In November 2023, Binance accepted its guilt regarding the violations of the Bank Secrecy Act including operating an unauthorized money transmitting firm and violations of the sanctions.
The firm agreed to pay penalties worth more than 4.3 billion dollars and accept three years of independent compliance monitoring. As per the plea agreement, Binance also consented to “cooperate fully” with law enforcement agencies in the United States and across the globe.
Since that time, the Department of Justice has suspended many corporate monitoring programs, while the memo that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche issued in April 2025 ended what it called “regulation by prosecution” of digital assets and led to the closure of the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team.
The internal memo, as stated by The Information, read that Binance is going to stop “courtesy freezes” and will need additional legal processes including MLAT requests sometimes before making the decision on specific asset freezing or seizing requests. If the idea is implemented, then the investigators may have to wait longer to recover potentially movable digital assets.
Yet, problems regarding compliance remain. The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists reported that the Cambodia-linked Huione Group transferred at least $408 million through Binance in November 2025, while the exchange was being monitored by court officials. In April 2026, Senator Richard Blumenthal asked the DOJ and Treasury for information regarding reports that more than $1 billion was sent via Binance to wallets linked to Iran.
Scott Armstrong, former official of the DOJ Fraud Section, said the rumored changes could lead to “an additional and quite frankly unnecessary hurdle that is going to cause a lot of problems in the law enforcement community.”
What to watch
Binance has disclosed that it has raised the matter of the DOJ memo with officials from the department in its effort to end the monitorship imposed on it by the court. Whether the disagreement results from a fundamental misunderstanding of the privacy laws in ADGM or represents a change in operational procedures could seriously impact the cross-border cryptocurrency enforcement.
Given that Binance is currently responsible for two-fifths of the global market of centralized spot cryptocurrency trading, law enforcement entities have started to depend more and more on the cooperation of Binance in freezing stolen or sanctioned asset in an efficient manner. Should there be a need for more formal requests to be made, the process of international investigations will become a lot slower and more complicated.



The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) is about to open subscription for its Shanghai IPO worth about 29.5 billion yuan (approximately 4.33 billion dollars) on July 16. This is significant not only because CXMT is the largest DRAM producer in China, but also because investors can use this event to evaluate the potential of the company in light of AI developments.
This listing comes about as the memory market across the globe is changing due to developments in AI infrastructure. Companies in the cloud business have started to set up AI data centers that require new technology with higher volume and speed, particularly in high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and DRAM.
With that, motherboard producers have prioritized higher profit-margin memory models. The shift has tightened supply and resulted in the continuous increase in memory prices.
Interest in CXMT has spread outside of China as well. According to Financial Times, Apple is checking the Chinese memory chip company’s products for their China-based devices, which proves the increased importance of Chinese manufacturers.
However, the process might turn out to be distorted due to geopolitical reasons supplied by new restrictions introduced by Washington regarding semiconductors. Cryptopolitan had reported previously that new developments in the U.S. will complicate Apple’s path in that direction.
This IPO comes as a result of the company’s quick financial recovery from losses it faced last year, making it now one of the key semiconductor IPOs in China.
The mechanics of the offering
As revealed by CXMT’s STAR Market documentation, preliminary bidding will begin on July 13 and the final IPO price announcement will happen on July 15. The institutional and retail subscriptions will commence on July 16 under the code 688825 for securities, while for online, the code will be 787825, and payment should be made by July 20.
CXMT intends to sell approximately 6.69 billion shares which will be around 10% of the enlarged share capital. The lead underwriter China International Capital Corporation also has an over-allotment option of 15% which may take the total number of shares under sale to over 7.69 billion shares.
CXMT aims to raise 29.5 billion yuan, making it the second-largest IPO in the history of Shanghai’s STAR Market after Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation and the largest A-share listing of 2026, according to the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC).
From losses to record earnings
CXMT’s financial performance has improved sharply alongside the industry’s recovery.
Caixin reported that the company posted a first-quarter net profit of 33 billion yuan after recording a 2.8-billion-yuan loss a year earlier, while revenue surged 719% year over year to 50.8 billion yuan.
The momentum is expected to continue. National Business Daily reported that CXMT forecasts first-half 2026 revenue of 110 billion to 120 billion yuan and net profit of 50 billion to 57 billion yuan, representing year-over-year profit growth of between 2,244% and 2,544%.
The company credits its recovery to restrained supply of DRAM products combined with increased pricing as demand related to AI has taken up all production capacity of the sector.
China’s flagship DRAM maker
Founded in 2016, CXMT is based in Hefei, Anhui and it is currently the largest DRAM manufacturer in China. It supplies memory chips to mobile phones, computers, servers and other computing devices. Its founder, Zhu Yiming, who was also behind GigaDevice, is the major stakeholder of the firm.
In June, the company got the approval from the CSRC for registering on the STAR Market, clearing the way for the IPO
Though it is still lagging behind Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix and Micron Technology in cutting-edge memory technologies, CXMT is still the leading manufacturer of DRAM in China. News that Apple is testing its chips indicates that foreign companies are becoming interested in China amid ongoing geopolitical conflicts.
Riding the AI memory supercycle
CXMT is going public during what industry experts refer to as a “memory supercycle.”
According to TrendForce, DRAM contract prices are projected to rise 13-18 percent in Q3, while NAND flash prices are estimated to increase by 10-15 percent due to shifting production capacities toward AI server memory. Gartner projects that overall revenue within the semiconductor sector might approach $1.3 trillion in 2026, with memory segment contributing to approximately 50 percent of the growth in the industry.
Leading cloud computing organizations are buying up huge quantities of memory dedicated to AI projects, thereby leaving little room for supplies for other potential customers and pushing DRAM prices higher, according to the report by TrendForce.
Unlike the previous cycles that were powered mainly by mobile phone and PC upgrades, the current rally is linked to the structural demand for AI infrastructure. One of the reasons behind this phenomenon is that memory manufacturing capacities are not easily increased in a short time, which has resulted in increasing production of HBM and enterprise DRAM, affecting availability of mainstream products and supporting elevated prices.
The favorable state of the market has obviously played into the hands of its competitors. South Korea’s SK Hynix is preparing for a U.S. ADR offering of about $28 billion ahead of its July 10 Nasdaq debut. If completed as planned, the transaction would become the largest foreign listing in U.S. history and the world’s second-largest share sale.
Investor sentiment regarding CXMT remains optimistic. Even though the IPO aims to raise 29.5 billion yuan, the estimates provided by National Business Daily claim the company’s value to be between 2 and 3 trillion yuan.
The valuation seems to be supported by the expectations of investors concerning the ability of CXMT to shorten the technological gap between the Chinese manufacturer and the global market leaders although maintaining such valuation will depend on the company’s ability to consistently bring new advanced DRAM technologies into commercialization rather than relying solely on favorable market conditions.
Founder commits to long-term stake
As stated by National Business Daily, Zhu Yiming has committed to not selling any of his shares within ten years following the timeframe of the IPO. In the following years, Zhu will sell up to 20% of his remaining holdings each year which is one of the longest-held voluntary lock-up commitments made by a founder of an A-share company.
Zhu is also preparing to allocate 768 million shares to his staff over the course of 10 years starting three years after the IPO. The value of the stock package is projected to be higher than 20 billion yuan based on the recent market prices, making it the largest individual employee equity grant in A-share market history, according to National Business Daily.
When subscriptions begin on July 16, the demand from investors will act as the initial test of the market’s confidence. Moreover, the IPO is predicted not only to reflect the success of the fundraising but also how high on the scale the investors put China’s aspiration to create a genuinely competitive memory sector during an AI semiconductor boom period. With Yangtze Memory Technologies also preparing for an IPO, CXMT’s debut could set the benchmark for future Chinese chip listings.



If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Kalshi has lost another round in court. A federal judge has turned down the company’s request to stop New York from applying its gambling laws to the prediction markets platform.
U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres in Manhattan issued the ruling on Tuesday. She said Kalshi was not entitled to a preliminary injunction. She reasoned that the federal Commodity Exchange Act does not override New York’s gambling laws when it comes to Kalshi’s sports-event contracts.
Torres said New York has strong reasons for its position. She pointed to the state’s goals of stopping gambling addiction, protecting the integrity of sports, and keeping unregulated contracts from spreading. Those interests, she wrote, “heavily” outweigh Kalshi’s arguments about federal law taking priority, and about customers running into what the company called “intractable” tech problems.
“Kalshi has not, therefore, made a clear or substantial showing that it is likely to succeed on the merits,” Torres wrote. She also noted that federal courts around the country remain split on this question.
A lawyer for Kalshi declined to comment on the ruling. The company has since filed an appeal with the federal appeals court in Manhattan.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul and Attorney General Letitia James put out a joint statement on Wednesday, welcoming the decision. “New York’s gambling laws are designed to protect consumers,” they said. “We will continue to hold all gambling platforms accountable to the law – and that includes prediction markets.”
Commodity Futures Trading Commission sees things differently
CFTC Chairman Michael Selig has said his agency holds “exclusive” authority over commodity derivatives markets, a category he says includes prediction markets.
Platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket let users bet on outcomes, from sports results to elections. Interest in them grew sharply after the 2024 presidential election, when their live odds turned out to be more accurate than traditional polls in predicting Donald Trump’s win over Kamala Harris.
As reported by Cryptopolitan previously, Kalshi first sued New York in October, after the state’s gaming commission told the company to stop offering sports event contracts without a license.
On April 21, New York filed separate lawsuits against Coinbase Financial Markets and Gemini Titan, accusing both companies of promoting gambling through their own event contracts.
Three days later, the CFTC sued New York. Last month, the CFTC said it has also challenged similar regulatory moves in eight other states: Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, Kentucky, Minnesota, New Mexico, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin.
Google bans prediction market extensions
In a second blow, Google has updated its Chrome Web Store rules to ban browser extensions tied to prediction markets.
The company’s Developer Program policy now lists predictive markets as a prohibited product. “Extensions that facilitate or enable real money transactions on predictive outcomes are not allowed,” Google said in a blog post announcing the change. Enforcement begins August 1, 2026.
Spotify has also recently spoken up about removal of its branding since no partnership exists between them.
That request came after Spotify found and removed more than 500,000 fake streams that had helped push Malcolm Todd’s song “Earrings” onto its charts. Kalshi had already settled a prediction market tied to those fake streams.



The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Sen. Ron Wyden, the Oregon Democrat sent a letter this week to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer. His ask: keep Section 604 in future drafts of the Clarity Act.
The disputed section is the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, known as BRCA.
BRCA began as its own bill. It later got folded into the bigger Clarity Act, and it has since become one of the hardest sticking points as lawmakers try to move crypto legislation forward.
The measure creates a safe harbor for developers who don’t hold or control customer funds. It says plainly that these developers should not count as money transmitters. Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., introduced the original bill earlier this year. Wyden is its only cosponsor.
“Smart policy will empower law enforcement to do its job and facilitate innovation at the same time,” Wyden wrote in the letter, seen by The Block. “As the Senate continues its consideration of the Clarity Act, I urge you to include the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act in any legislative package.”
Pressure builds from Law Enforcement
Pressure on Section 604 built up in June. Two separate coalitions sent letters raising concerns about the developer safe harbor. Law enforcement groups said their main worries hadn’t been addressed. The Catholic anti-trafficking network went further, telling Senate leaders to rework the section before the bill moves ahead.
The first letter came from groups representing more than 70,000 prosecutors, sheriffs, and police officers. Signers included the National District Attorneys Association, NAAUSA, the International Association of Chiefs of Police, and the National Sheriffs’ Association. It went to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt. The letter warned that broad exemptions could shield people who help move illicit money.
“Regulatory certainty should not come at the expense of accountability, transparency, victim protection, or public safety,” the letter read. The groups said the problem isn’t limited to Section 604 either. Other parts of the Clarity Act, they argued, could weaken transparency and leave gaps in anti-money-laundering safeguards that law enforcement relies on.
The second letter came from the Alliance to End Human Trafficking, a network of Catholic sisters and advocates. It went to Thune and Schumer, and it tied Section 604 directly to trafficking and money-laundering risks.
“We are particularly concerned that certain provisions under Section 604 could create broad carveouts and regulatory ambiguities that may make it more difficult to responsibly monitor illicit financial activity tied to trafficking, organized crime, child exploitation, sanctions evasion, and other forms of abuse,” the alliance wrote.
Industry support and Wyden’s rationale
Much of the crypto industry backs the section as reported by Cryptopolitan previously. Supporters say it gives software developers legal clarity and keeps innovation from moving overseas.
In his letter, Wyden said the provision would line up policy between the Department of Justice and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. The goal, he said, is to focus resources on people running unlicensed money transmitting businesses, not on ordinary coders.
“The provision also includes a common-sense exception that any non-custodial developers found to be transferring or using funds originating from illicit activity are not protected, ensuring that bad actors can still be held accountable while avoiding the unintended consequence of mistreating neutral software developers as financial intermediaries,” Wyden wrote.
The fight over BRCA is now one of the biggest unresolved pieces of the Clarity Act. Lawmakers are also stuck on whether new ethics rules are needed for officials with crypto ties, including President Donald Trump. Time is short. Congress leaves Washington in August, and the November elections are getting close.
Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

OpenAI began rolling out a rebuilt voice mode to ChatGPT consumer users on Wednesday, replacing Advanced Voice Mode with two models, GPT-Live-1 and GPT-Live-1 mini, that can hear a user and respond at the same time.
The update will be made available to free and paid consumer accounts and comes one day prior to the launch of the GPT-5.6 model family by the company.
The main reason behind the shift to GPT Live is architectural. While previous voice models would wait for the human speaker to finish their sentence, GPT-Live operates based on OpenAI’s full-duplex architecture, which involves processing input speech while generating output speech at the same time.
According to OpenAI’s announcement, the model decides many times per second whether to talk, keep listening, pause, cut in, or reach for a tool. In practice, that means a user can talk over it, stop to think without being interrupted, or hear it drop in an “mhmm” to signal it is following along.
OpenAI brings GPT-Live to ChatGPT Voice
Free ChatGPT accounts now default to GPT-Live-1 mini, while subscribers on the Go, Plus, and Pro tiers get the larger GPT-Live-1.
The rollout covers iOS, Android, and the web, and because ChatGPT already works through CarPlay, 9to5Mac noted the update also lands in the car. OpenAI says the nine voices in ChatGPT have been remastered for the new models.
It also said it built GPT-Live to be a conversationalist, not a reasoning engine. For more complex requests, GPT-Live does not handle everything on its own. According to OpenAI, the voice model is capable of delegating tasks like web search, reasoning, and even multistep answers to GPT-5.5 without pausing the voice conversation.
This is supposed to address one of the major shortcomings of ChatGPT’s earlier voice mode, where it sometimes seemed to be less powerful compared to typing. Users will also have the option of selecting between a quick-response mode and a high-effort mode.
OpenAI is also adding near real-time speech translation and visual cards for weather, stock prices, and sports scores, giving users some answers on screen instead of having ChatGPT read everything aloud. The company said more than 150 million people already use ChatGPT features such as Voice and Dictation each week.
GPT-Live improves voice flow but leaves gaps
According to TechCrunch, which covered an OpenAI press conference, the Hindi translation had a strong American accent along with very stiff and bookish language.
Per OpenAI, the model works best for “some of the most common languages in ChatGPT,” although they warn that there might be a problem with the accent or fluency in some languages. Also, OpenAI stated that voice in combination with videos and screen sharing is not supported as of now.
While OpenAI has pitched GPT-Live as a more human version of its entire model lineup, it insists that it is not an AI companion. The company also highlighted safeguards it had put in place to guarantee age-appropriate responses to teens. It also added that crisis resources are in place should a user conversation be geared towards self-harm.
Audio clips from Live and Advanced Voice conversations are retained for 30 days and are not used to train models unless users choose to share them.
Atty Eleti, product lead for ChatGPT Voice, told the briefing he has held 30- to 40-minute conversations with the feature on walks, and argued voice could become a main way people run longer, more complex tasks.
The kind of amazing use cases that we see people using Codex and ChatGPT to accomplish, we think voice can be the future interface to all kinds of work
– Eleti via TechCrunch
GPT-5.6 launch puts the timing in focus
The voice update is separate from the model release OpenAI has scheduled for Thursday.
According to Cryptopolitan, the approval of GPT-5.6 for public release was granted after the U.S. Department of Commerce had released the embargo imposed during its national security review, and it is available in three versions: Sol, Terra, and Luna.
GPT-Live is set to reach OpenAI’s API after the consumer rollout, with developers able to register for access.



The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Meta will build a 1-gigawatt AI data center in Sturgeon County, Alberta, the company’s first in Canada and, by its own account, its largest outside the United States. Meta puts the investment at more than CAD $13 billion, or roughly $9.2 billion in US dollars.
The company confirmed the project on Wednesday, July 8, at a Calgary news conference where Gary Demasi, Meta’s vice-president of data center strategy and development, appeared alongside Alberta Premier Danielle Smith.
As reported by EnergyNow, Gary Demasi said:
We are excited to announce that Sturgeon County, Alberta, will be home to Meta’s newest data center.
The site sits about 35 kilometers north of Edmonton in the Alberta Industrial Heartland, a zone set aside for heavy industry. It will span roughly 2.9 million square feet and rank as Meta’s 33rd data center worldwide, joining a fleet that already includes facilities in Sweden, Ireland, Denmark, and Singapore.
Meta describes the campus as optimized for the AI workloads behind products used by billions of people. As Cryptopolitan earlier reported, the company plans to spend up to $135 billion on AI infrastructure in 2026, nearly double the $72 billion it spent in 2025.
Alberta lands its biggest project since the oilsands era
Meta’s own newsroom lists about 3,000 construction workers at peak build and more than 300 permanent operational jobs, plus roughly CAD $60 million toward local roads and water infrastructure. Alberta’s government frames the payoff more broadly: an estimated $250 million a year in taxes, natural gas royalties, and industry levies, according to Culture Alberta and EnergyNow.
Technology Minister Nate Glubish tied the win to a deliberate campaign. He said he first pitched Meta’s data center team in Silicon Valley about two years ago, when the company had not considered the province. “It did not happen by accident. It happened by design,” Glubish said.
For scale, reports note the campus would be the largest capital project in the province since Suncor’s $17 billion Fort Hills oilsands mine. And the $13 billion figure covers the buildings, not the AI chips inside them. Carson Kearl, an analyst at Enverus, said the project could eventually drive more than $75 billion in total spending once chips and networking gear are counted.
Gas power becomes the key trade-off for Meta’s AI campus
The data center’s power will come from Alberta’s grid and a gas plant next door. That gas plant, called Greenlight Electricity Center, is a stand-alone $4.6 billion facility owned by Pembina Pipeline, Morgan Stanley Infrastructure Partners and Kineticor. Meta doesn’t own the plant, it just purchases the power it generates.
The announcement also solved a small mystery: when the Greenlight plant got its go-ahead on July 2, its backers would only describe the buyer as a single “major data center” customer, Culture Alberta reported. Meta is that customer. The plant is targeted to come online in the second half of 2030.
The facility would require about as much electricity as 800,000 homes would, having power of up to 970 megawatts from the grid, as well as up to 1,800 megawatts of onsite gas generation when fully built out, according to reports. That reliance on gas is key to the province’s argument, and it’s also a source of contention.
Alberta’s grid is far more carbon-intensive than Canada’s national average. Meta says it will match its electricity use with 100% clean and renewable energy and is screening clean-energy projects in the region to offset consumption.
The Pembina Institute, a clean-energy think tank unrelated to the pipeline company, warned that the added gas demand means household electricity costs will keep rising in the years ahead.
Glubish argued the reverse on transmission, saying Meta’s roughly $100 million a year in transmission fees would spread fixed costs across more users and cut other Albertans’ transmission charges by up to six percent.
Meta: “Dry cooling will limit water use”
Meta says that on water, the site will use a closed loop, liquid-cooled system with dry cooling, using no water at all for cooling purposes, as per its newsroom and CBC News.
On-site water use will be limited to domestic needs, fire safety, and equipment maintenance.
Our annual water use is actually less than a typical Alberta golf course.
Meta has also pledged to be water positive by 2030 and, in Alberta, to help conserve 200 acres of grassland, trees, and wetlands in the North Saskatchewan River watershed.
The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

AI company Mistral AI unveiled an 8-billion-parameter model, called Robostral Navigate, that steers robots with a single camera on Wednesday, marking the French company’s first move into physical A.
The launch is intended to challenge the sensor-heavy navigation systems used across warehouses and factories.
Mistral AI builds novel navigation system with AI
The Paris-based startup, valued at 11.7 billion euros (about $13.4 billion) in its September Series C round, has spent most of its existence competing with OpenAI on text and code. Its new model, Robostral Navigate, however, puts the company in a totally different tech category.
According to a Mistral press release, the model handles “embodied navigation,” which lets a robot move through offices, homes, commercial buildings, and outdoor spaces without external input.
However, unlike regular autonomous navigation models that lean on LiDAR, depth sensors, or several cameras working together, Robostral Navigate runs on a single RGB camera. All the model requires is a plain-language instruction just like an AI text prompt, after which it produces the movement commands to carry it out.
Mistral AI trial numbers
Mistral AI says the robotic AI model scored 76.6% on R2R-CE validation unseen, a benchmark that measures how well a robot follows instructions in environments it was not trained on. That figure beat the best previous single-camera scores by 9.7 points, according to The News International.
AI Weekly reported that the model also edged out multi-sensor systems built on LiDAR and depth by 4.5 points, with a validation-seen score of 79.4%.
If these gaps hold in real-life situations, it would be of utmost importance to those interested in industrial robots. Naturally, the general assumption in mobile robotics has been that cameras alone are too fragile, so a full sensor stack is compulsory. A build with just a single camera that matches or beats full stack systems would cut the parts bill for warehouse and facility machines.
Skepticism surrounding real-life usage
It is worth noting that these scores come from simulated situations and not real life. Mistral claims to have trained the model on about 400,000 trajectories across 6,000 scenes, using a method the company claims cut training tokens by a factor of 22, while shortening runs that took previously took months to only days.
But as AI Weekly noted, the company has not published any actual robot usage results or figures regarding on-device latency. Engineers have also questioned if a 76.6% success rate is good enough for deployment in real life.
Mistral is also reported to be in talks to raise about 3 billion euros (approximately $3.42 billion) at a valuation close to 20 billion euros (about $23 billion).
Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

The 50-week moving average of Ethereum crossed below the 200-week average, creating a “death cross.” This is seen as a long-term bearish indicator. Meanwhile, Bitcoin is struggling to stay above $62,000 after being unable to break through the $64,000 to $65,000 resistance area. Such a pattern matters for the retail investors who flocked into crypto through exchange-traded funds and are now trading in the red.
Bitcoin price declined by around 2% over the last 24 hours and was mostly stuck in the low $62,000 territory. However, it recovered from dropping below $58,000, a new 21-month low. Ethereum has been trading below $1,750, which is almost 4% lower than the previous day and about 30% below its value one year ago. All other altcoins followed suit. Crypto market cap excluding Bitcoin and Ether has declined 30% from January.
Ether’s technical warning
The death cross is the main technical event. On-Chain data shows that the 50-week exponential moving average of Ether has crossed below its 200-week counterpart. This has previously managed to avoid such a move during all selloffs. Prediction markets traders bet that the bear trend will continue. It appears that there is a 72.3% chance that Ether will reach $1,500 before rising to $3,000. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index reads 26, flashing “extreme fear” among investors.
Crypto ETF outflows laid out the most evident statistic of the destruction. The outflows of US Bitcoin funds amounted to nearly $1.79 billion in the week ending June 26, and opinions differ regarding how terrible this performance was. The data showed that it was one of the worst weeks for Bitcoin ETFs since their introduction in January 2024. Turns out that this $1.79 billion outflow equals the second biggest week on record, being beaten only by a $2.61 billion outflow in late February 2025.
Regardless of that, this streak is the longest one yet for the group. As per SoSoValue data, there were already seven consecutive weeks of outflows, which began back in mid-May and exceeded two prior five-week streaks.
ETF investors turn underwater
Those ETF outflows tell the tale of retail. The typical IBIT investor is now sitting on close to 40% in losses. This is in sharp contrast to the typical IBIT investor being in the black by about 30% as of mid-2025. IBIT has posted $60.26 billion in inflows but has net assets of $44.42 billion as Bitcoin price dipped by more than 23% over the last 60 days.
The situation is equally dire for Spot Ether funds, which have lost $273.34 million over the same period, marking their seventh consecutive week of outflows.
There is one piece of positive news as Bitcoin ETFs ended a 10-day streak of $2.7 billion in outflows. The sell-off has coincided with a hawkish stance from the Fed. The Fed kept interest rates unchanged at its June 18 meeting and removed the word “ease” from its statement, while the probability of a rate increase in December is currently above 50%,
This pessimism might be overstated, given that every Bitcoin bear cycle since 2009 ended with the onset of extreme fear, and the next halving period, when the production of new bitcoins falls by half, is expected in about 21 months. This time, there is an additional factor to offset the bear market – the presence of institutional investors in the form of spot ETFs, company balance sheets, and the legal framework of digital assets, which was nonexistent during the previous cycle.
Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Perpetuals.com Ltd (Nasdaq: PDC) has signed a non-binding term sheet to explore buying the Trump-linked fintech, Alt5 Sigma Canada, Inc.
The fintech company was known as ALT5 Sigma Corporation until April. If the deal closes, it could be worth up to $15 million and function as a lifeline for the company that has warned it may not survive the year.
Why is AI Financial selling its core business?
Perpetuals.com Ltd (NASDAQ: PDC) has signed a non-binding term sheet to explore buying Alt5 Sigma Canada Inc., a profitable subsidiary of AI Financial Corporation (Nasdaq: AIFC).
The term sheet was disclosed on July 7 in a statement from Matthew Nicoletti, chief strategy officer at Perpetuals. Nicoletti said Perpetuals is still running due diligence and emphasized that nothing has been finalized as the company is still weighing how the purchase might fit its product roadmap.
What is Trump’s connection?
AI Financial was ALT5 Sigma Corporation (Nasdaq: ALTS) until it announced a rebrand and ticker change in April, according to Reuters. The Las Vegas firm, in 2025, recorded roughly $24.8 million in fintech revenue and processed about $3.5 billion in transactions, with more than $8 billion in cumulative volume since inception. It also lost $5.86 per share over the trailing twelve months.
Cryptopolitan reported that Alt5 tied itself to World Liberty Financial, the Trump family’s crypto venture, through a $1.5 billion crypto reserve arrangement. Through that arrangement, World Liberty received stock and board seats. Eric Trump appeared on the company’s leadership page as an adviser and board observer as recently as March, then disappeared from it by late April.
In its most recent annual filing, AI Financial recorded a loss of more than $341 million and told investors there was serious doubt about whether it could keep operating for another year.
Before the deal can be completed, Perpetual laid out that first, due diligence must be completed, they have to agree on a price, sign the definitive documents, get board approval, and clear regulators. The company said it will present to investors at the Global Technology Virtual Investor Conference on July 9 and the Emerging Growth Conference on July 15, where questions about the proposed deal are likely to surface.
Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

The Bank of America has offered a $520 million credit line to OpenAI, with the ChatGPT maker preparing to go public in an IPO. This move pulls one of Wall Street’s largest institutions deeper into the business of financing AI.
This hands the Bank of America a foothold in what could become one of the biggest listings ever, and also signals that a historically cautious bank now sees AI startups as worth the financial risk.
Bank of America makes a U-turn
Bank of America, run by CEO Brian Moynihan, had kept its distance from AI startups because a lot of them kept losing money. However, increased competition in the AI financing sector has changed this.
OpenAI had already pulled in more than $5 billion from other financiers, and the bank has calculated that sitting out meant potentially losing access to an IPO that could feed its Merrill Lynch wealth-management arm.
The bank is also a huge player in the happenings on Wall Street. It carries a $3.5 trillion balance sheet, holds the second-largest deposit share in the United States, and trades at a market cap of about $424 billion.
OpenAI IPO positioning
Since last year, the Bank of America has helped to raise almost $500 billion for AI-related companies. According to Reuters, this figure accounts for 60% of all of that type of fundraising across leveraged finance, investment-grade debt, and equity capital markets. Reuters also reported that the bank was weighing advisory roles in the IPOs of both OpenAI and its rival Anthropic.
The Bank of America worked as one of the bookrunners on SpaceX’s public listing and ran the IPO’s US retail distribution. Elon Musk’s rocket and AI company debuted in June at a valuation above $2 trillion, which remains the largest IPO on record.
OpenAI filed confidentially for a US listing last month and is targeting a valuation above $1 trillion, although the company has reportedly considered delaying the offering.
The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

A deputy home minister told parliament on Wednesday that since 2022, Malaysian police have arrested 629 people and taken back 75,578 crypto mining machines in more than 3,000 raids. The fight against miners who steal power from the national grid is getting tougher.
According to Bernama and The Star, Datuk Seri Dr. Shamsul Anuar Nasarah gave these numbers during Ministry Question Time in the Dewan Rakyat, the lower house of parliament. They are up to date as of May 2026 and include 3,049 raids across the country. The Royal Malaysian Police, Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB), the Energy Commission, and local councils all worked together on the raids.
A lawmaker named Datuk Siti Zailah Mohd Yusoff asked Shamsul a follow-up question. She pushed the ministry about what she called a lack of prosecutions against miners who steal electricity. He said that law enforcement will now rely more on sharing information and using technology to find high-risk areas before raids. This will allow for what he called a “faster and more precise” response.
Owning crypto is legal, stealing power is not
In Malaysia, people can own and trade crypto, but the government does not recognize it as money. Digital assets are regulated by the Securities Commission Malaysia. Bank Negara Malaysia is the country’s central bank. Its job is to keep the economy stable and enforce laws against money laundering.
The crackdown is meant to stop the theft of electricity that comes with it. Shamsul said that a setup is breaking the law when it uses unauthorized connections, tampered meters, breaks down supply systems, or runs without the right licenses. Since Malaysia doesn’t have a specific law against crypto mining, people who do it are charged under the Electricity Supply Act with bypassing or tampering with meters.
People who want to steal power are drawn to mining rigs. They keep going and pull heavy loads all the time. Shamsul told parliament that operators often tamper with meters to hide how much energy is being used. This drives up utility costs and can make the supply that homes and businesses nearby depend on less stable.
He also talked about claims made before about raids in Manjung, Perak. He said that investigators found no proof that any police officers, agents, or members of the Manjung municipal council were involved in any illegal raids in the area.
Losses top $1 billion
TNB says that between 2018 and 2024, electricity theft related to crypto mining increased by about 300%. The number of cases found increased from 610 to 2,397, as Cryptopolitan reported in November 2025. The power company said that illegal power use by miners at about 14,000 locations between 2020 and August 2025 cost it more than 4.6 billion ringgit, or about $1.1 billion.
This is the same driver that the police have used before, Shamsul said. It’s the need for digital assets and the money that can be made when token prices change. The lawmaker made it clear that gains do not make crimes less serious and that illegal mining is against the law and costs power companies and their customers real money.
Investigators are making lists of properties that might be suspects. TNB has been putting in smart meters that can tell right away if someone is tampering with them or using them in a way that isn’t normal.
Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.