Could $BTC ever break its 21M supply cap? Adam Back says that idea is a dangerous trap 👀 Peter Todd argues $BTC may eventually need a tiny permanent block reward once new issuance ends around 2140. Adam Back strongly disagrees - and says changing the cap could damage one of Bitcoin’s most important guarantees. Todd’s argument is simple: miners currently earn both block rewards and fees, but the reward keeps shrinking every four years. Eventually, fees alone would need to secure the network. 💰 His solution? A small “tail emission” that never fully disappears. Back sees a much bigger problem. Raising the supply cap would require a hard fork and broad agreement from holders, miners and the wider network - something far harder than a normal protocol update. ⚡ For now, nothing is changing. But the debate matters because Bitcoin’s 21M limit is one of the reasons investors trust its scarcity. If that rule ever became negotiable, the market reaction could be much bigger than the technical change itself. ⚖ #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#