Wendy 🇻🇳
22.7k Publications
Wendy 🇻🇳
Compte Square Vérifié+Provided for general informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice | Powered by API
#BinanceTurns7 task 2
#BinanceTurns7
Top Voices
139 Suivis
83.1K+ Abonnés
237.5K+ J’aime
3 Badges
Publications
Tous
Citations
Vidéos
Direct
PINNED
What Trading Outside Binance P2P Actually Costs You
The rate looked better. No platform fees. Faster settlement, the seller promised.
I almost did it.
A contact in a Tele group was offering USDT 0.3% above the best rate on Binance 's P2P platform. They had a long message history in the group, positive comments from other members, and a transaction record screenshot going back eight months.
I asked for one thing: move the trade onto Binance P2P instead.
They disappeared from the group within the hour.
Off-platform trades remove every protection that makes P2P workable.
No escrow locks the crypto before you send payment. Your money moves first, and the seller controls whether the crypto follows. There's nothing holding their side of the deal while your bank transfer clears.
Binance Support cannot touch a transaction that never happened on their platform. No Order ID means no dispute record, no chat log to pull, no way for their team to intervene regardless of what evidence you bring them afterward.
After the fact, options shrink fast. Crypto sent off-platform leaves a blockchain trace, but recovering funds through local law enforcement on a peer deal is genuinely rare in practice.
The 0.3% better rate on a $1,000 trade saves $3.
Losing the full amount to someone who knew exactly what they were doing costs $1,000.
The math isn't complicated. The pressure in the moment is what makes people ignore it.
Anyone directing you toward Tele, or any channel outside Binance P2P is removing the infrastructure that protects you, not offering you a better deal.
If a trade can't happen on the platform, it shouldn't happen at all.
@Binance Vietnam $BTC $ETH $BNB
#BinanceP2PAnToan
The rate looked better. No platform fees. Faster settlement, the seller promised.
I almost did it.
A contact in a Tele group was offering USDT 0.3% above the best rate on Binance 's P2P platform. They had a long message history in the group, positive comments from other members, and a transaction record screenshot going back eight months.
I asked for one thing: move the trade onto Binance P2P instead.
They disappeared from the group within the hour.
Off-platform trades remove every protection that makes P2P workable.
No escrow locks the crypto before you send payment. Your money moves first, and the seller controls whether the crypto follows. There's nothing holding their side of the deal while your bank transfer clears.
Binance Support cannot touch a transaction that never happened on their platform. No Order ID means no dispute record, no chat log to pull, no way for their team to intervene regardless of what evidence you bring them afterward.
After the fact, options shrink fast. Crypto sent off-platform leaves a blockchain trace, but recovering funds through local law enforcement on a peer deal is genuinely rare in practice.
The 0.3% better rate on a $1,000 trade saves $3.
Losing the full amount to someone who knew exactly what they were doing costs $1,000.
The math isn't complicated. The pressure in the moment is what makes people ignore it.
Anyone directing you toward Tele, or any channel outside Binance P2P is removing the infrastructure that protects you, not offering you a better deal.
If a trade can't happen on the platform, it shouldn't happen at all.
@Binance Vietnam $BTC $ETH $BNB
#BinanceP2PAnToan
What If You Bought the AI Sector at Its Mid-June Peak?
The AI crypto sector reached a roughly $22.3 billion market cap around mid-June 2026 before giving back most of those gains.
So what would happen if you had put $10,000 into each of these AI tokens at their six-month highs?
According to the data in the chart, the results today would look very different:
* KAITO: $14,090 (+40.9%)
* FIL: $8,220 (-17.8%)
* ICP: $8,040 (-19.6%)
* INJ: $8,120 (-18.8%)
* VIRTUAL: $7,960 (-20.4%)
* TAO: $6,940 (-30.6%)
* NEAR: $6,370 (-36.3%)
* RENDER: $6,090 (-39.1%)
* FET: $5,880 (-41.2%)
* VELVET: $5,430 (-45.7%)
* KITE: $5,370 (-46.3%)
* VVV: $5,300 (-47.0%)
The standout is obvious.
KAITO is the only token in this list currently above its mid-June level, while the rest have given back anywhere from roughly 18% to 47%.
But there’s a more useful takeaway here than simply calling one token a winner.
A strong narrative can lift an entire sector, but sector momentum doesn’t mean every token will retain those gains.
At the peak, the AI narrative was attracting attention and capital. Once momentum reversed, the difference between individual projects became much more visible.
That’s why buying into a hot sector isn’t just about asking:
“Do I believe in AI?”
Sometimes the more important question is:
“Am I buying the narrative, or am I buying the momentum at its peak?”
Source: data shown in the provided infographic.
#Crypto #AI #KAITO #TAO #Altcoins
The AI crypto sector reached a roughly $22.3 billion market cap around mid-June 2026 before giving back most of those gains.
So what would happen if you had put $10,000 into each of these AI tokens at their six-month highs?
According to the data in the chart, the results today would look very different:
* KAITO: $14,090 (+40.9%)
* FIL: $8,220 (-17.8%)
* ICP: $8,040 (-19.6%)
* INJ: $8,120 (-18.8%)
* VIRTUAL: $7,960 (-20.4%)
* TAO: $6,940 (-30.6%)
* NEAR: $6,370 (-36.3%)
* RENDER: $6,090 (-39.1%)
* FET: $5,880 (-41.2%)
* VELVET: $5,430 (-45.7%)
* KITE: $5,370 (-46.3%)
* VVV: $5,300 (-47.0%)
The standout is obvious.
KAITO is the only token in this list currently above its mid-June level, while the rest have given back anywhere from roughly 18% to 47%.
But there’s a more useful takeaway here than simply calling one token a winner.
A strong narrative can lift an entire sector, but sector momentum doesn’t mean every token will retain those gains.
At the peak, the AI narrative was attracting attention and capital. Once momentum reversed, the difference between individual projects became much more visible.
That’s why buying into a hot sector isn’t just about asking:
“Do I believe in AI?”
Sometimes the more important question is:
“Am I buying the narrative, or am I buying the momentum at its peak?”
Source: data shown in the provided infographic.
#Crypto #AI #KAITO #TAO #Altcoins
The Top 5 Cryptos by Market Cap Right Now
The gap between the biggest crypto assets is still pretty wide.
Here are the current top five by market capitalization:
🟠 Bitcoin: $1.30T
⚪ Ethereum: $231.7B
🟡 BNB: $80.4B
⚫ XRP: $64.8B
🟣 Solana: $44.6B
Bitcoin is still in a league of its own.
Its market cap is now more than 5x Ethereum's, while ETH has a sizeable lead over the rest of the top five.
The closer race is further down the list.
BNB currently ranks third at $80.4B, followed by XRP at $64.8B and Solana at $44.6B.
These rankings can change quickly, though. Market cap moves with price, and a relatively small shift in the larger assets can reshape the order below them.
The interesting question isn't just who's in the top five today.
It's which asset could move up the fastest from here?
Market cap figures provided in the source data.
#Bitcoin #Ethereum #BNB #XRP #Solana
The gap between the biggest crypto assets is still pretty wide.
Here are the current top five by market capitalization:
🟠 Bitcoin: $1.30T
⚪ Ethereum: $231.7B
🟡 BNB: $80.4B
⚫ XRP: $64.8B
🟣 Solana: $44.6B
Bitcoin is still in a league of its own.
Its market cap is now more than 5x Ethereum's, while ETH has a sizeable lead over the rest of the top five.
The closer race is further down the list.
BNB currently ranks third at $80.4B, followed by XRP at $64.8B and Solana at $44.6B.
These rankings can change quickly, though. Market cap moves with price, and a relatively small shift in the larger assets can reshape the order below them.
The interesting question isn't just who's in the top five today.
It's which asset could move up the fastest from here?
Market cap figures provided in the source data.
#Bitcoin #Ethereum #BNB #XRP #Solana
Thailand Has 0% Crypto Tax. What About Vietnam?
A crypto tax map is making the rounds again, listing countries and territories such as the UAE, Singapore, Hong Kong, Thailand and Switzerland as having 0% crypto tax.
That naturally raises another question for Vietnamese investors:
What about Vietnam?
The answer has changed significantly in 2026.
Vietnam is not currently a 0% crypto-tax jurisdiction.
The Ministry of Finance issued Circular 32/2026/TT-BTC on March 27, 2026. Under the current framework, individuals transferring crypto assets are subject to 0.1% personal income tax on the transfer value of each transaction. The rule applies during the pilot period for Vietnam's crypto-asset market.
So that "When Vietnam?" question in the graphic has a fairly straightforward answer:
Vietnam already has a specific crypto tax framework.
And I think that's actually more interesting than the 0% headline.
Vietnam has been moving from uncertainty toward a more defined framework for digital assets, including rules covering taxation, market participation and the pilot crypto-asset market. The Ministry of Finance has also established procedures related to tax declaration and payment for crypto-asset activities.
Whether Vietnam eventually moves toward a more competitive tax regime is another question.
For now, the important part is knowing that 0% is not the current rule for individual crypto transfers in Vietnam.
Source: Vietnam Ministry of Finance. Vietnam Ministry of Finance - Crypto-asset tax policy
This is general information, not tax advice. Tax obligations can depend on the type of transaction and the taxpayer's circumstances.
A crypto tax map is making the rounds again, listing countries and territories such as the UAE, Singapore, Hong Kong, Thailand and Switzerland as having 0% crypto tax.
That naturally raises another question for Vietnamese investors:
What about Vietnam?
The answer has changed significantly in 2026.
Vietnam is not currently a 0% crypto-tax jurisdiction.
The Ministry of Finance issued Circular 32/2026/TT-BTC on March 27, 2026. Under the current framework, individuals transferring crypto assets are subject to 0.1% personal income tax on the transfer value of each transaction. The rule applies during the pilot period for Vietnam's crypto-asset market.
So that "When Vietnam?" question in the graphic has a fairly straightforward answer:
Vietnam already has a specific crypto tax framework.
And I think that's actually more interesting than the 0% headline.
Vietnam has been moving from uncertainty toward a more defined framework for digital assets, including rules covering taxation, market participation and the pilot crypto-asset market. The Ministry of Finance has also established procedures related to tax declaration and payment for crypto-asset activities.
Whether Vietnam eventually moves toward a more competitive tax regime is another question.
For now, the important part is knowing that 0% is not the current rule for individual crypto transfers in Vietnam.
Source: Vietnam Ministry of Finance. Vietnam Ministry of Finance - Crypto-asset tax policy
This is general information, not tax advice. Tax obligations can depend on the type of transaction and the taxpayer's circumstances.
Binance bStocks Is Pulling Ahead in Tokenized Stocks
The tokenized stock market has been growing, but the distribution of that growth is starting to look interesting.
Over the past 90 days, Binance bStocks added $594.4 million in market cap, putting it well ahead of several other major platforms.
For comparison:
* xStocks: +$192.8M
* Securitize: +$183.3M
* Reality: +$137.6M
Then there’s the blockchain side.
BNB Chain added $519.6 million in tokenized stock market cap over the same period.
Ethereum added $218.3M, while Solana added $201.0M.
That gap is hard to ignore.
It suggests the growth of tokenized stocks isn’t happening evenly across chains. Binance bStocks is gaining market cap quickly, while BNB Chain is also taking a large share of the growth among the networks tracked here.
For me, the interesting question isn’t simply whether tokenized stocks will keep growing.
It’s where that growth will settle.
If more issuers and users continue choosing BNB Chain, the competition in tokenized equities could eventually become as much about liquidity and distribution as it is about the stocks themselves.
Source: Token Terminal.
The tokenized stock market has been growing, but the distribution of that growth is starting to look interesting.
Over the past 90 days, Binance bStocks added $594.4 million in market cap, putting it well ahead of several other major platforms.
For comparison:
* xStocks: +$192.8M
* Securitize: +$183.3M
* Reality: +$137.6M
Then there’s the blockchain side.
BNB Chain added $519.6 million in tokenized stock market cap over the same period.
Ethereum added $218.3M, while Solana added $201.0M.
That gap is hard to ignore.
It suggests the growth of tokenized stocks isn’t happening evenly across chains. Binance bStocks is gaining market cap quickly, while BNB Chain is also taking a large share of the growth among the networks tracked here.
For me, the interesting question isn’t simply whether tokenized stocks will keep growing.
It’s where that growth will settle.
If more issuers and users continue choosing BNB Chain, the competition in tokenized equities could eventually become as much about liquidity and distribution as it is about the stocks themselves.
Source: Token Terminal.
X Is Changing How Creators Earn. Original Content Now Matters More.
X has introduced its Original Content Rewards Program, while closing new enrollment for the existing Revenue Sharing program.
At first glance, this looks like another creator monetization update.
I think the bigger change is in what X is actually trying to reward.
The new program puts more weight on original ideas, analysis, reporting, expertise, commentary, creativity, and personal perspective. Simply reposting someone else's content and adding a short caption is not enough.
That distinction matters.
X specifically says that minor edits, descriptive summaries, attribution, simple text overlays, or low-value reactions generally don't count as meaningful transformation. If the main value still comes from someone else's content, the post may not qualify as original.
For creators who want to qualify, the main requirements include:
• At least 500 verified followers
• At least 500,000 Home Timeline impressions from verified users in the last 90 days
• An X Premium, Premium+ or Premium Business subscription
• A Personal or Business account in good standing
• Regularly posting original content
Eligible creators earn from qualified impressions, which are unique impressions from Premium users on the Home Timeline where at least 50% of the post is visible. Payments are scheduled every two weeks.
There is also a clear shift for existing Revenue Sharing creators. Revenue Sharing earnings continue through September 7, 2026, with access to apply for Original Content Rewards rolling out from September 8.
But the part I find most useful is much simpler:
Before posting, ask yourself what you're actually adding.
If the post would be just as valuable without your contribution, there probably isn't enough of your own perspective in it yet.
That changes the creator game a little. The goal is no longer just to find something people will click on. You need to give them a reason to stay for your take.
Source: X Original Content Rewards Program.
$BTC
X has introduced its Original Content Rewards Program, while closing new enrollment for the existing Revenue Sharing program.
At first glance, this looks like another creator monetization update.
I think the bigger change is in what X is actually trying to reward.
The new program puts more weight on original ideas, analysis, reporting, expertise, commentary, creativity, and personal perspective. Simply reposting someone else's content and adding a short caption is not enough.
That distinction matters.
X specifically says that minor edits, descriptive summaries, attribution, simple text overlays, or low-value reactions generally don't count as meaningful transformation. If the main value still comes from someone else's content, the post may not qualify as original.
For creators who want to qualify, the main requirements include:
• At least 500 verified followers
• At least 500,000 Home Timeline impressions from verified users in the last 90 days
• An X Premium, Premium+ or Premium Business subscription
• A Personal or Business account in good standing
• Regularly posting original content
Eligible creators earn from qualified impressions, which are unique impressions from Premium users on the Home Timeline where at least 50% of the post is visible. Payments are scheduled every two weeks.
There is also a clear shift for existing Revenue Sharing creators. Revenue Sharing earnings continue through September 7, 2026, with access to apply for Original Content Rewards rolling out from September 8.
But the part I find most useful is much simpler:
Before posting, ask yourself what you're actually adding.
If the post would be just as valuable without your contribution, there probably isn't enough of your own perspective in it yet.
That changes the creator game a little. The goal is no longer just to find something people will click on. You need to give them a reason to stay for your take.
Source: X Original Content Rewards Program.
$BTC
The One Binance P2P Step Most Traders Rush and Regret
I've seen it happen more than once.
A buyer sends payment, gets a message saying the money is on its way, sees a screenshot of a transfer confirmation, and releases the crypto.
The money never arrives.
The screenshot was fake. The seller had edited it in under three minutes using a free online tool. Nothing in the image looked wrong.
That moment — releasing crypto before the money actually lands in your account — is the single most expensive mistake in P2P trading.
On Binance, the release button is always yours to press. The escrow holds the seller's crypto safely. But the moment you tap release, the trade closes. No undo. No recall whatsoever.
So here's the actual check I run before releasing anything.
I open my bank app directly. Not a screenshot someone sent me. Not a chat message saying "check, I sent." My own app, my own account, the actual balance on screen. I look for the exact amount. I check the timestamp matches the trade window.
If the numbers are right, I release.
Anything else, I wait.
Four situations should make you pause before releasing: the deposit amount doesn't match exactly, the sender name doesn't match what's listed on the Binance P2P order, someone in chat is pushing you to move faster than you're comfortable with, or the transfer timestamp falls outside the agreed window.
That fourth one gets ignored most often. Pressure to move fast almost always means someone needs you to act before you notice something is off.
Save your Order ID before closing any trade. Binance Support needs that number to trace a transaction if something goes wrong after the fact. Without it, the dispute process takes much longer than it needs to.
One check. Takes 30 seconds. Has saved me from releasing crypto on a fake payment at least twice.
@Binance Vietnam
#BinanceP2PAnToan $BTC $ETH $BNB
I've seen it happen more than once.
A buyer sends payment, gets a message saying the money is on its way, sees a screenshot of a transfer confirmation, and releases the crypto.
The money never arrives.
The screenshot was fake. The seller had edited it in under three minutes using a free online tool. Nothing in the image looked wrong.
That moment — releasing crypto before the money actually lands in your account — is the single most expensive mistake in P2P trading.
On Binance, the release button is always yours to press. The escrow holds the seller's crypto safely. But the moment you tap release, the trade closes. No undo. No recall whatsoever.
So here's the actual check I run before releasing anything.
I open my bank app directly. Not a screenshot someone sent me. Not a chat message saying "check, I sent." My own app, my own account, the actual balance on screen. I look for the exact amount. I check the timestamp matches the trade window.
If the numbers are right, I release.
Anything else, I wait.
Four situations should make you pause before releasing: the deposit amount doesn't match exactly, the sender name doesn't match what's listed on the Binance P2P order, someone in chat is pushing you to move faster than you're comfortable with, or the transfer timestamp falls outside the agreed window.
That fourth one gets ignored most often. Pressure to move fast almost always means someone needs you to act before you notice something is off.
Save your Order ID before closing any trade. Binance Support needs that number to trace a transaction if something goes wrong after the fact. Without it, the dispute process takes much longer than it needs to.
One check. Takes 30 seconds. Has saved me from releasing crypto on a fake payment at least twice.
@Binance Vietnam
#BinanceP2PAnToan $BTC $ETH $BNB
$BTC The Coldcard Hacker Moves BTC Again. Here's What We Know.
A wallet linked to the Coldcard exploit has become active once more.
According to Arkham Intelligence, the address labeled Coldcard Hacker transferred 30.185 BTC, worth approximately $1.94 million, to a new Bitcoin wallet about an hour ago.
The wallet is associated with the theft of roughly 2,055 BTC, currently valued at around $130 million.
One detail stands out.
The funds were not sent to an exchange deposit address. Instead, they were transferred to another wallet, which means the blockchain data alone does not reveal the next step.
A wallet-to-wallet transfer does not necessarily indicate a sale. It could be part of internal fund management, an effort to improve privacy, or preparation for future transactions.
Even so, movements from wallets connected to major exploits are closely monitored because they can provide early signals if stolen assets begin moving toward exchanges or other liquidation channels.
Source: Arkham Intelligence.
A wallet linked to the Coldcard exploit has become active once more.
According to Arkham Intelligence, the address labeled Coldcard Hacker transferred 30.185 BTC, worth approximately $1.94 million, to a new Bitcoin wallet about an hour ago.
The wallet is associated with the theft of roughly 2,055 BTC, currently valued at around $130 million.
One detail stands out.
The funds were not sent to an exchange deposit address. Instead, they were transferred to another wallet, which means the blockchain data alone does not reveal the next step.
A wallet-to-wallet transfer does not necessarily indicate a sale. It could be part of internal fund management, an effort to improve privacy, or preparation for future transactions.
Even so, movements from wallets connected to major exploits are closely monitored because they can provide early signals if stolen assets begin moving toward exchanges or other liquidation channels.
Source: Arkham Intelligence.
$ETH The Jaredfromsubway Exploiter Lost Over $500K Trading ETH
Stealing funds and trading them profitably are two very different things.
According to Arkham Intelligence, the wallet linked to the Jaredfromsubway exploiter has completed another major ETH trade, and the numbers tell an interesting story.
About a month ago, the exploiter stole roughly $7.7 million and converted the funds into ETH.
The wallet later sold 2,327 ETH at an average price of around $1,695 per coin.
Roughly 10 hours ago, it bought back 2,063 ETH at approximately $1,912.
The result was a realized trading loss of about 264 ETH, worth roughly $505,000 at current prices.
This serves as a useful reminder that on-chain activity doesn't always reflect successful trading. Even wallets associated with high-profile exploits can make costly market decisions after the exploit itself.
Large blockchain movements often attract attention, but the outcome isn't always what people expect.
Source: Arkham Intelligence.
Stealing funds and trading them profitably are two very different things.
According to Arkham Intelligence, the wallet linked to the Jaredfromsubway exploiter has completed another major ETH trade, and the numbers tell an interesting story.
About a month ago, the exploiter stole roughly $7.7 million and converted the funds into ETH.
The wallet later sold 2,327 ETH at an average price of around $1,695 per coin.
Roughly 10 hours ago, it bought back 2,063 ETH at approximately $1,912.
The result was a realized trading loss of about 264 ETH, worth roughly $505,000 at current prices.
This serves as a useful reminder that on-chain activity doesn't always reflect successful trading. Even wallets associated with high-profile exploits can make costly market decisions after the exploit itself.
Large blockchain movements often attract attention, but the outcome isn't always what people expect.
Source: Arkham Intelligence.
$SOL pump.fun Moves Another 84,789 SOL. Its Total SOL Sales Have Now Reached $807 Million.
Another sizeable SOL transfer from pump.fun has caught the market's attention.
According to Arkham Intelligence, several pump.fun fee wallets transferred a combined 84,789 SOL, worth roughly $6.25 million, to Kraken over the past few hours.
This wasn't an isolated event.
Arkham estimates that pump.fun has sold approximately 4,823,325 SOL in total, generating around $807 million at an average selling price of $167.4 per SOL.
Those numbers highlight how much value the platform has realized since becoming one of the most active applications in the Solana ecosystem.
One detail is worth keeping in mind.
A transfer to an exchange deposit address is often interpreted as preparation to sell, but on-chain data alone cannot confirm whether every deposited token has already been sold. It simply shows that the assets were moved to Kraken.
Even so, wallets linked to major protocols are closely monitored because repeated exchange deposits can influence short-term market sentiment, especially when they involve multi-million-dollar transfers.
Source: Arkham Intelligence.
Another sizeable SOL transfer from pump.fun has caught the market's attention.
According to Arkham Intelligence, several pump.fun fee wallets transferred a combined 84,789 SOL, worth roughly $6.25 million, to Kraken over the past few hours.
This wasn't an isolated event.
Arkham estimates that pump.fun has sold approximately 4,823,325 SOL in total, generating around $807 million at an average selling price of $167.4 per SOL.
Those numbers highlight how much value the platform has realized since becoming one of the most active applications in the Solana ecosystem.
One detail is worth keeping in mind.
A transfer to an exchange deposit address is often interpreted as preparation to sell, but on-chain data alone cannot confirm whether every deposited token has already been sold. It simply shows that the assets were moved to Kraken.
Even so, wallets linked to major protocols are closely monitored because repeated exchange deposits can influence short-term market sentiment, especially when they involve multi-million-dollar transfers.
Source: Arkham Intelligence.
$BTC Bitcoin Miners Move Nearly 600 BTC. The Transfers Are Getting Attention.
Two of the largest publicly listed Bitcoin mining companies have moved another sizeable amount of BTC.
According to Arkham Intelligence, MARA transferred 200 BTC, worth around $12.86 million, to NYDIG. Around the same time, Riot Platforms sent another 381 BTC, valued at approximately $24.51 million, to the same destination.
The combined transfers total 581 BTC, making them difficult to ignore.
One detail is worth keeping in mind, though.
A transfer to NYDIG does not automatically mean those coins have been sold. The movement could be related to custody, treasury management, collateral, or preparation for a future transaction. On-chain data alone cannot confirm the final purpose.
MARA also continues to hold a substantial Bitcoin treasury of roughly 36,303 BTC, valued at about $2.34 billion.
Large miner transfers rarely tell the whole story on their own. Even so, they are closely watched because miners represent one of the market's natural sources of Bitcoin supply. If these transfers eventually lead to exchange inflows or confirmed sales, they could become more relevant for short-term market sentiment.
Source: Arkham Intelligence.
Two of the largest publicly listed Bitcoin mining companies have moved another sizeable amount of BTC.
According to Arkham Intelligence, MARA transferred 200 BTC, worth around $12.86 million, to NYDIG. Around the same time, Riot Platforms sent another 381 BTC, valued at approximately $24.51 million, to the same destination.
The combined transfers total 581 BTC, making them difficult to ignore.
One detail is worth keeping in mind, though.
A transfer to NYDIG does not automatically mean those coins have been sold. The movement could be related to custody, treasury management, collateral, or preparation for a future transaction. On-chain data alone cannot confirm the final purpose.
MARA also continues to hold a substantial Bitcoin treasury of roughly 36,303 BTC, valued at about $2.34 billion.
Large miner transfers rarely tell the whole story on their own. Even so, they are closely watched because miners represent one of the market's natural sources of Bitcoin supply. If these transfers eventually lead to exchange inflows or confirmed sales, they could become more relevant for short-term market sentiment.
Source: Arkham Intelligence.
OpenAI Expands Free ChatGPT Access With GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI has announced a major upgrade for ChatGPT users on the Free and Go plans.
Starting this week, GPT-5.6 Luna will become the default model for both tiers. The rollout doesn't stop there.
Beginning next week, OpenAI plans to introduce unlimited text chats for Free users, along with a new "Think" button designed for prompts that require deeper reasoning.
There is still an important limitation.
The announcement makes it clear that image generation, file uploads, and several other tools will continue to have usage caps, so the expanded access applies primarily to text conversations rather than every feature available in ChatGPT.
For users who mainly rely on ChatGPT for writing, brainstorming, coding, or research, this could significantly improve the day-to-day experience without requiring a paid subscription.
According to OpenAI, the rollout will take place gradually over the coming week, so availability may vary depending on your account and region.
Source: OpenAI.
OpenAI has announced a major upgrade for ChatGPT users on the Free and Go plans.
Starting this week, GPT-5.6 Luna will become the default model for both tiers. The rollout doesn't stop there.
Beginning next week, OpenAI plans to introduce unlimited text chats for Free users, along with a new "Think" button designed for prompts that require deeper reasoning.
There is still an important limitation.
The announcement makes it clear that image generation, file uploads, and several other tools will continue to have usage caps, so the expanded access applies primarily to text conversations rather than every feature available in ChatGPT.
For users who mainly rely on ChatGPT for writing, brainstorming, coding, or research, this could significantly improve the day-to-day experience without requiring a paid subscription.
According to OpenAI, the rollout will take place gradually over the coming week, so availability may vary depending on your account and region.
Source: OpenAI.
Adding liquidity on BSC no longer has to start with a manual swap or token-ratio math.
With Zap in Binance Wallet DeFi, you can deposit a single token and open an LP position in one transaction. Using two tokens instead? Pick any ratio you want.
Zap Out works the other way around: exit an LP position and receive one token.
Now available on BSC for Uniswap V3 and PancakeSwap V3.
Open Binance Wallet → DeFi → Add Liquidity, then turn on Zap.
With Zap in Binance Wallet DeFi, you can deposit a single token and open an LP position in one transaction. Using two tokens instead? Pick any ratio you want.
Zap Out works the other way around: exit an LP position and receive one token.
Now available on BSC for Uniswap V3 and PancakeSwap V3.
Open Binance Wallet → DeFi → Add Liquidity, then turn on Zap.
$BTC US July Non-Farm Payrolls Miss Expectations. Here's What Happened.
The latest US Non-Farm Payrolls (NFP) report delivered a significant downside surprise.
Instead of adding roughly 80,000 to 83,000 jobs, the US economy lost 23,000 jobs during July, well below market expectations.
Here are the key figures:
Non-Farm Payrolls: -23,000 (Forecast: 80,000-83,000)
Unemployment Rate: 4.1% (Forecast: 4.2%)
Average Hourly Earnings (MoM): +0.1% (Forecast: +0.3%)
The report sends mixed signals.
Job creation weakened sharply, while wage growth also slowed, both of which could suggest that the labor market is losing momentum. At the same time, the unemployment rate came in lower than expected, indicating that employment conditions remain relatively resilient.
For financial markets, the focus now shifts to how this data could influence expectations for future Federal Reserve policy. Employment and wage data are among the most closely watched indicators because they can affect interest rate expectations, which often have a direct impact on risk assets, including cryptocurrencies.
Markets are likely to pay close attention to the Fed's next signals as they reassess the path for monetary policy.
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The latest US Non-Farm Payrolls (NFP) report delivered a significant downside surprise.
Instead of adding roughly 80,000 to 83,000 jobs, the US economy lost 23,000 jobs during July, well below market expectations.
Here are the key figures:
Non-Farm Payrolls: -23,000 (Forecast: 80,000-83,000)
Unemployment Rate: 4.1% (Forecast: 4.2%)
Average Hourly Earnings (MoM): +0.1% (Forecast: +0.3%)
The report sends mixed signals.
Job creation weakened sharply, while wage growth also slowed, both of which could suggest that the labor market is losing momentum. At the same time, the unemployment rate came in lower than expected, indicating that employment conditions remain relatively resilient.
For financial markets, the focus now shifts to how this data could influence expectations for future Federal Reserve policy. Employment and wage data are among the most closely watched indicators because they can affect interest rate expectations, which often have a direct impact on risk assets, including cryptocurrencies.
Markets are likely to pay close attention to the Fed's next signals as they reassess the path for monetary policy.
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The Crypto Projects Quietly Outperforming in 2026
Not every strong performer dominates Crypto Twitter.
Several projects have delivered impressive year-to-date returns while receiving far less attention than many of the market’s biggest narratives.
Here are some of the notable names.
Top Performers
* $US: +713%
* $VVV: +596.95%
* $UB: +319.33%
* $ALLO: +170.19%
* $JST: +150.77%
* $FUN: +146.80%
* $TAG: +146.12%
* $STABLE: +137.86%
* $CFG: +49.65%
* $PIEVERSE: +43.81%
* $AKT: +34.32%
What’s Driving the Performance?
Several recurring themes appear across these projects:
Token value accrual
* $VVV expanded its buy-and-burn program.
* $JST continued revenue-funded buybacks alongside record token burns.
* $TAG introduced USD1-related buybacks.
Projects with clear mechanisms that reduce circulating supply continue attracting investor attention.
AI Momentum
* $US benefited from AI agent narratives and a significant short squeeze.
* $UB gained momentum following its agent marketplace launch and an OKX listing.
* $ALLO participated in the broader AI infrastructure rotation.
AI remains one of the strongest narratives in crypto throughout 2026.
Real-World Assets
* $STABLE advanced with its Tether-backed chain launch.
* $CFG benefited from renewed interest in tokenized real-world assets as TVL continued to expand.
Ecosystem Growth
* $FUN saw increased activity through new game launches and token burns.
* $PIEVERSE gained visibility following its Upbit listing and agentic payments narrative.
* $AKT continued strengthening its decentralized compute ecosystem through protocol upgrades and growing network demand.
The Bigger Picture
Strong returns rarely come from hype alone.
Many of this year’s best-performing projects combined multiple catalysts, including product launches, ecosystem expansion, exchange listings, revenue-sharing models, or supply reduction mechanisms.
Performance alone doesn’t guarantee future returns, but understanding why a project is outperforming often provides more insight than simply looking at the percentage gain.
Not every strong performer dominates Crypto Twitter.
Several projects have delivered impressive year-to-date returns while receiving far less attention than many of the market’s biggest narratives.
Here are some of the notable names.
Top Performers
* $US: +713%
* $VVV: +596.95%
* $UB: +319.33%
* $ALLO: +170.19%
* $JST: +150.77%
* $FUN: +146.80%
* $TAG: +146.12%
* $STABLE: +137.86%
* $CFG: +49.65%
* $PIEVERSE: +43.81%
* $AKT: +34.32%
What’s Driving the Performance?
Several recurring themes appear across these projects:
Token value accrual
* $VVV expanded its buy-and-burn program.
* $JST continued revenue-funded buybacks alongside record token burns.
* $TAG introduced USD1-related buybacks.
Projects with clear mechanisms that reduce circulating supply continue attracting investor attention.
AI Momentum
* $US benefited from AI agent narratives and a significant short squeeze.
* $UB gained momentum following its agent marketplace launch and an OKX listing.
* $ALLO participated in the broader AI infrastructure rotation.
AI remains one of the strongest narratives in crypto throughout 2026.
Real-World Assets
* $STABLE advanced with its Tether-backed chain launch.
* $CFG benefited from renewed interest in tokenized real-world assets as TVL continued to expand.
Ecosystem Growth
* $FUN saw increased activity through new game launches and token burns.
* $PIEVERSE gained visibility following its Upbit listing and agentic payments narrative.
* $AKT continued strengthening its decentralized compute ecosystem through protocol upgrades and growing network demand.
The Bigger Picture
Strong returns rarely come from hype alone.
Many of this year’s best-performing projects combined multiple catalysts, including product launches, ecosystem expansion, exchange listings, revenue-sharing models, or supply reduction mechanisms.
Performance alone doesn’t guarantee future returns, but understanding why a project is outperforming often provides more insight than simply looking at the percentage gain.
Does DCA Always Win? These Results Say Otherwise.
Dollar-cost averaging (DCA) is one of the most popular investing strategies in crypto, but your choice of asset still matters.
Assuming you invested $100 every month from 2022 through August 2026, your total investment would be $5,600.
The outcomes would have looked very different depending on the asset.
Performance
* $TRX: $16,521 (+195.0%)
* $BTC: $8,660 (+54.6%)
* $XRP: $8,465 (+51.2%)
* $SOL: $8,025 (+43.3%)
* $ETH: $4,898 (−12.5%)
* $ADA: $2,616 (−53.3%)
Consistency Beats Volatility
The standout performer is $TRX, which nearly tripled the invested capital through consistent monthly purchases.
$BTC, $XRP, and $SOL also generated positive returns despite experiencing multiple corrections during the period.
Meanwhile, $ETH and $ADA remind investors that DCA does not eliminate asset-specific risk. Investing consistently into an underperforming asset can still produce negative returns over several years.
The Lesson
DCA reduces the impact of trying to time the market, but it does not guarantee profits.
Long-term success still depends on choosing assets that continue to create value, attract users, and maintain market demand over time.
A disciplined strategy matters-but so does what you’re buying.
Dollar-cost averaging (DCA) is one of the most popular investing strategies in crypto, but your choice of asset still matters.
Assuming you invested $100 every month from 2022 through August 2026, your total investment would be $5,600.
The outcomes would have looked very different depending on the asset.
Performance
* $TRX: $16,521 (+195.0%)
* $BTC: $8,660 (+54.6%)
* $XRP: $8,465 (+51.2%)
* $SOL: $8,025 (+43.3%)
* $ETH: $4,898 (−12.5%)
* $ADA: $2,616 (−53.3%)
Consistency Beats Volatility
The standout performer is $TRX, which nearly tripled the invested capital through consistent monthly purchases.
$BTC, $XRP, and $SOL also generated positive returns despite experiencing multiple corrections during the period.
Meanwhile, $ETH and $ADA remind investors that DCA does not eliminate asset-specific risk. Investing consistently into an underperforming asset can still produce negative returns over several years.
The Lesson
DCA reduces the impact of trying to time the market, but it does not guarantee profits.
Long-term success still depends on choosing assets that continue to create value, attract users, and maintain market demand over time.
A disciplined strategy matters-but so does what you’re buying.
Are Privacy Coins Finally Showing Relative Strength?
Privacy coins have quietly fallen out of the spotlight over the past few years, but price structure suggests not all of them are behaving the same.
Some continue to build constructive trends despite a difficult altcoin market, while others remain stuck in long-term downtrends.
Stronger Structures
Three projects currently stand out from a technical perspective:
* $ZEC
* $ZANO
* $ZAMA
All three continue to hold higher lows and avoid breaking their broader uptrend structure. In a market where many altcoins continue making lower lows, that relative strength deserves attention.
This doesn’t necessarily mean they will outperform, but it suggests selling pressure has been absorbed more effectively than many peers.
Still Showing Weakness
Not every privacy-focused project is seeing the same behavior.
Projects such as:
* $NIGHT
* $DASH
* $CCD
continue to trade within lower-high, lower-low structures, indicating that longer-term selling pressure has not yet been fully exhausted.
Why Price Structure Matters
During difficult market conditions, price structure often says more than short-term price moves.
Assets that maintain higher lows while the broader market struggles may indicate:
* Stronger long-term holder conviction.
* Reduced supply entering the market.
* Buyers willing to defend previous support levels.
Conversely, repeated lower highs generally suggest sellers continue to dominate rallies.
What To Watch Next
The current technical picture becomes more convincing if:
* $ZEC, $ZANO and $ZAMA continue defending their latest higher lows.
* Trading volume expands during breakouts instead of only during short-term spikes.
* $NIGHT, $DASH and $CCD fail to reclaim previous swing highs, confirming their longer-term downtrends remain intact.
Privacy coins have quietly fallen out of the spotlight over the past few years, but price structure suggests not all of them are behaving the same.
Some continue to build constructive trends despite a difficult altcoin market, while others remain stuck in long-term downtrends.
Stronger Structures
Three projects currently stand out from a technical perspective:
* $ZEC
* $ZANO
* $ZAMA
All three continue to hold higher lows and avoid breaking their broader uptrend structure. In a market where many altcoins continue making lower lows, that relative strength deserves attention.
This doesn’t necessarily mean they will outperform, but it suggests selling pressure has been absorbed more effectively than many peers.
Still Showing Weakness
Not every privacy-focused project is seeing the same behavior.
Projects such as:
* $NIGHT
* $DASH
* $CCD
continue to trade within lower-high, lower-low structures, indicating that longer-term selling pressure has not yet been fully exhausted.
Why Price Structure Matters
During difficult market conditions, price structure often says more than short-term price moves.
Assets that maintain higher lows while the broader market struggles may indicate:
* Stronger long-term holder conviction.
* Reduced supply entering the market.
* Buyers willing to defend previous support levels.
Conversely, repeated lower highs generally suggest sellers continue to dominate rallies.
What To Watch Next
The current technical picture becomes more convincing if:
* $ZEC, $ZANO and $ZAMA continue defending their latest higher lows.
* Trading volume expands during breakouts instead of only during short-term spikes.
* $NIGHT, $DASH and $CCD fail to reclaim previous swing highs, confirming their longer-term downtrends remain intact.
Where Is Venture Capital Flowing in Crypto?
Recent funding rounds show a clear picture of where investors are placing their biggest bets.
Startup valuations by sector
* Prediction Markets: $30B
* Trading & Exchanges: $16.3B
* Wallets & Infrastructure: $9B
* Payments & Banking: $6.55B
* Intelligence & Compliance: $1.67B
* Insurance: $190M
Prediction Markets Stand Out
The most notable trend is the rapid increase in valuation for prediction market platforms.
* Kalshi has reached a $22B valuation.
* Polymarket is reportedly seeking funding at more than $20B, roughly 2.2× its previous valuation of around $9B only months earlier.
This pace of valuation growth is significantly faster than what is being observed across most other crypto sectors.
Infrastructure Continues to Attract Capital
Payments, exchanges, wallets, and infrastructure companies continue to receive substantial investment, but capital is spread across multiple participants rather than concentrating on a single dominant company.
This suggests venture investors still view crypto infrastructure as a long-term growth theme with multiple potential winners.
The Key Risk Is Regulation
For prediction markets, the investment thesis appears to depend less on technology and more on regulation.
The products have already demonstrated strong user demand, but broader adoption still depends on how regulators treat prediction markets across major jurisdictions.
As a result, today’s premium valuations represent a significant bet that regulatory developments will ultimately favor the sector, while infrastructure continues to be funded as the foundation of the broader crypto ecosystem.
Recent funding rounds show a clear picture of where investors are placing their biggest bets.
Startup valuations by sector
* Prediction Markets: $30B
* Trading & Exchanges: $16.3B
* Wallets & Infrastructure: $9B
* Payments & Banking: $6.55B
* Intelligence & Compliance: $1.67B
* Insurance: $190M
Prediction Markets Stand Out
The most notable trend is the rapid increase in valuation for prediction market platforms.
* Kalshi has reached a $22B valuation.
* Polymarket is reportedly seeking funding at more than $20B, roughly 2.2× its previous valuation of around $9B only months earlier.
This pace of valuation growth is significantly faster than what is being observed across most other crypto sectors.
Infrastructure Continues to Attract Capital
Payments, exchanges, wallets, and infrastructure companies continue to receive substantial investment, but capital is spread across multiple participants rather than concentrating on a single dominant company.
This suggests venture investors still view crypto infrastructure as a long-term growth theme with multiple potential winners.
The Key Risk Is Regulation
For prediction markets, the investment thesis appears to depend less on technology and more on regulation.
The products have already demonstrated strong user demand, but broader adoption still depends on how regulators treat prediction markets across major jurisdictions.
As a result, today’s premium valuations represent a significant bet that regulatory developments will ultimately favor the sector, while infrastructure continues to be funded as the foundation of the broader crypto ecosystem.
Connectez-vous pour découvrir plus de contenu