Wendy 🇻🇳
23.7k Publications
Wendy 🇻🇳
Compte Square Vérifié+Binance Affiliate | Crypto Insights | Web3 | 🏅 Rising Star 2024 • Brand Amplifier H1/2026
#BinanceTurns7
#BinanceTurns7 task 2
Top Voices
194 Suivis
83.2K+ Abonnés
238.3K+ J’aime
3 Badges
Publications
Tous
Citations
Vidéos
Direct
PINNED
How TermMax Turns Leverage Into A Known Cost
What if leverage had a maximum loss you could see before entering?
I went deeper into TermMax Alpha after looking at the fixed-rate side of the protocol, and the design is quite different from the usual margin trade.
@TermMax uses an options-style structure.
Going Long means buying a call. Going Short means buying a put. Instead of maintaining a margin balance and waiting to see whether liquidation kicks in, the trader pays an upfront premium known as Max Cost.
That number matters.
Max Cost is also the maximum amount the position can lose.
So if I open a Long and the market moves against me, the loss does not keep expanding through a liquidation cascade. The downside is defined by the premium paid upfront.
The payoff is asymmetric.
A profitable Long can benefit when the underlying moves above the strike price, while a losing position simply expires with the premium as the loss.
I like this structure because it changes the question from “How close am I to liquidation?” to “Is this premium worth paying for the exposure I want?”
But there is a catch.
Defined downside does not mean cheap leverage.
TermMax charges trading fees, and profitable positions can also face an exercise fee, so the premium is only one part of the actual trading cost.
I’d also watch liquidity closely.
An option-style market can look attractive on paper, but execution still depends on available counterparties and pricing.
That is what makes Alpha interesting to me.
The experiment isn't whether leverage can exist without liquidation.
It is whether traders will prefer paying a known cost upfront for that tradeoff.
#TermMax
What if leverage had a maximum loss you could see before entering?
I went deeper into TermMax Alpha after looking at the fixed-rate side of the protocol, and the design is quite different from the usual margin trade.
@TermMax uses an options-style structure.
Going Long means buying a call. Going Short means buying a put. Instead of maintaining a margin balance and waiting to see whether liquidation kicks in, the trader pays an upfront premium known as Max Cost.
That number matters.
Max Cost is also the maximum amount the position can lose.
So if I open a Long and the market moves against me, the loss does not keep expanding through a liquidation cascade. The downside is defined by the premium paid upfront.
The payoff is asymmetric.
A profitable Long can benefit when the underlying moves above the strike price, while a losing position simply expires with the premium as the loss.
I like this structure because it changes the question from “How close am I to liquidation?” to “Is this premium worth paying for the exposure I want?”
But there is a catch.
Defined downside does not mean cheap leverage.
TermMax charges trading fees, and profitable positions can also face an exercise fee, so the premium is only one part of the actual trading cost.
I’d also watch liquidity closely.
An option-style market can look attractive on paper, but execution still depends on available counterparties and pricing.
That is what makes Alpha interesting to me.
The experiment isn't whether leverage can exist without liquidation.
It is whether traders will prefer paying a known cost upfront for that tradeoff.
#TermMax
PINNED
Why TermMax’s Range Orders Matter More Than Another Fixed APY
I used to think fixed-rate DeFi was mostly about locking in a better number.
Then I looked at how @TermMax actually handles pricing.
The interesting part is the curve.
A TermMax Range Order lets borrowers or lenders define how their rate changes as the order gets filled, instead of treating the whole position as one static quote.
That creates a different way to think about liquidity.
A borrower can set a borrowing curve where the first portion fills at one rate and later portions move to another.
A lender can do the reverse, starting with a lower target rate and asking for higher rates as more capital gets deployed.
There is even a two-way version.
I found this part particularly interesting because the same order can act on both sides of the market, using separate borrowing and lending curves and capturing the spread between them.
That is closer to market making than simply depositing into a lending pool.
📊 The tradeoff is obvious too.
More control means more decisions.
You need to understand where your curve should sit, how much liquidity you actually want deployed, and what happens when market conditions move away from your assumptions.
I’m still watching this part closely because the real test isn't whether a pricing curve looks elegant on paper.
It is whether enough capital and order flow show up to make those curves useful in a live market.
Would you use range-based fixed-rate markets?
#TermMax
I used to think fixed-rate DeFi was mostly about locking in a better number.
Then I looked at how @TermMax actually handles pricing.
The interesting part is the curve.
A TermMax Range Order lets borrowers or lenders define how their rate changes as the order gets filled, instead of treating the whole position as one static quote.
That creates a different way to think about liquidity.
A borrower can set a borrowing curve where the first portion fills at one rate and later portions move to another.
A lender can do the reverse, starting with a lower target rate and asking for higher rates as more capital gets deployed.
There is even a two-way version.
I found this part particularly interesting because the same order can act on both sides of the market, using separate borrowing and lending curves and capturing the spread between them.
That is closer to market making than simply depositing into a lending pool.
📊 The tradeoff is obvious too.
More control means more decisions.
You need to understand where your curve should sit, how much liquidity you actually want deployed, and what happens when market conditions move away from your assumptions.
I’m still watching this part closely because the real test isn't whether a pricing curve looks elegant on paper.
It is whether enough capital and order flow show up to make those curves useful in a live market.
Would you use range-based fixed-rate markets?
#TermMax
Yes, more control matters
100%
No, simple pools are better
0%
5 Votes • Vote fermé
$ENS is waking up.
But I’m not chasing this +14% candle.
LONG only if $ENS reclaims 4,600 and holds the retest.
Entry: 4,500-4,650
SL: 4,180
TP: 5,000 / 5,450
Watch the 4,600 level before trading the move.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
But I’m not chasing this +14% candle.
LONG only if $ENS reclaims 4,600 and holds the retest.
Entry: 4,500-4,650
SL: 4,180
TP: 5,000 / 5,450
Watch the 4,600 level before trading the move.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
$TURBO just exploded higher on the 4H chart, but I’m not chasing 0.00090+.
I want the pullback.
LONG: 0.000865-0.000875
TP: 0.0009267
SL: 0.000845
The 4H structure is strong, with volume expanding and price holding above the major EMAs.
If $TURBO pulls back into the entry zone and that micro support holds, check the chart for the continuation long.
If 0.000845 breaks, the setup is off.
Not financial advice. Manage risk.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
I want the pullback.
LONG: 0.000865-0.000875
TP: 0.0009267
SL: 0.000845
The 4H structure is strong, with volume expanding and price holding above the major EMAs.
If $TURBO pulls back into the entry zone and that micro support holds, check the chart for the continuation long.
If 0.000845 breaks, the setup is off.
Not financial advice. Manage risk.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
$1000SATS just printed a strong 4H expansion, but 0.00001250 is still the level to beat.
LONG above 0.00001250
Entry: 0.00001250-0.00001265
TP: 0.00001320 / 0.00001380
SL: 0.00001205
Momentum and volume are strong, so I’m looking for continuation rather than a countertrend short.
No chase at the current price.
If $1000SATS closes above 0.00001250 and holds the breakout, check the chart for the long setup.
Not financial advice. Manage risk.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
LONG above 0.00001250
Entry: 0.00001250-0.00001265
TP: 0.00001320 / 0.00001380
SL: 0.00001205
Momentum and volume are strong, so I’m looking for continuation rather than a countertrend short.
No chase at the current price.
If $1000SATS closes above 0.00001250 and holds the breakout, check the chart for the long setup.
Not financial advice. Manage risk.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
$DOGE is sitting right below the 0.08347 resistance after a powerful 4H breakout.
Here’s the setup I’m watching:
LONG above 0.08347
Entry: 0.0835-0.0840
TP: 0.0858 / 0.0880
SL: 0.0818
Volume is expanding and the 4H trend remains strongly bullish.
I want the breakout confirmed first.
If $DOGE closes above 0.08347, check the chart and take the long only if the breakout holds.
Not financial advice. Manage risk.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
Here’s the setup I’m watching:
LONG above 0.08347
Entry: 0.0835-0.0840
TP: 0.0858 / 0.0880
SL: 0.0818
Volume is expanding and the 4H trend remains strongly bullish.
I want the breakout confirmed first.
If $DOGE closes above 0.08347, check the chart and take the long only if the breakout holds.
Not financial advice. Manage risk.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
$PENGU just broke out on the 4H chart with heavy volume and is now testing 0.007337.
I’m looking for the pullback, not the chase.
LONG: 0.00705-0.00715
TP: 0.00741 / 0.00765
SL: 0.00682
The breakout structure remains bullish while price holds above the 25 EMA and Supertrend.
If $PENGU pulls back into the entry zone and prints a bullish reaction, check the setup and take the long.
No pullback, no chase.
Not financial advice. Manage risk.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
I’m looking for the pullback, not the chase.
LONG: 0.00705-0.00715
TP: 0.00741 / 0.00765
SL: 0.00682
The breakout structure remains bullish while price holds above the 25 EMA and Supertrend.
If $PENGU pulls back into the entry zone and prints a bullish reaction, check the setup and take the long.
No pullback, no chase.
Not financial advice. Manage risk.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
$PUMP is testing 0.003777 after a strong 4H expansion.
I’m watching the reaction at this high.
LONG above 0.003777
Entry: 0.00378-0.00383
TP: 0.00395 / 0.00415
SL: 0.00355
Volume expanded with the move, while the 7 EMA remains above the 25 EMA and Supertrend.
If the 4H candle closes above 0.003777, the breakout has my attention.
Check $PUMP and take the long only if the breakout confirms.
Not financial advice. Manage risk.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
I’m watching the reaction at this high.
LONG above 0.003777
Entry: 0.00378-0.00383
TP: 0.00395 / 0.00415
SL: 0.00355
Volume expanded with the move, while the 7 EMA remains above the 25 EMA and Supertrend.
If the 4H candle closes above 0.003777, the breakout has my attention.
Check $PUMP and take the long only if the breakout confirms.
Not financial advice. Manage risk.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
$WIF is pressing the 0.1625 high again on the 1H chart.
LONG above 0.1625
Entry: 0.1625-0.1632
TP: 0.1640 / 0.1670
SL: 0.1585
The trend is strong, with price holding above the 7/25/99 EMAs and Supertrend.
I want the 1H breakout confirmed before entering.
If $WIF closes above 0.1625 with volume, check the setup and take the long only if the breakout holds.
Not financial advice. Manage risk.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
LONG above 0.1625
Entry: 0.1625-0.1632
TP: 0.1640 / 0.1670
SL: 0.1585
The trend is strong, with price holding above the 7/25/99 EMAs and Supertrend.
I want the 1H breakout confirmed before entering.
If $WIF closes above 0.1625 with volume, check the setup and take the long only if the breakout holds.
Not financial advice. Manage risk.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
$1000PEPE is pressing against 0.0032356 after holding a strong 15M uptrend.
Price is still above the 7 EMA, 25 EMA and Supertrend, but the breakout has not been confirmed yet.
The level I’m watching is simple:
Trigger: 15M close above 0.0032356 with volume
First objective: 0.0032836
I’m not chasing the current price before the breakout. The risk/reward is not attractive enough in the middle of the setup.
If $1000PEPE closes above 0.0032356 with real volume, I’ll reassess the continuation trade.
If the breakout fails and price loses the 0.00319 area, the setup goes back to watchlist.
Keep $1000PEPE on the chart and trade only after the breakout confirms.
Not financial advice. Manage risk and use a size you can afford to lose.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
Price is still above the 7 EMA, 25 EMA and Supertrend, but the breakout has not been confirmed yet.
The level I’m watching is simple:
Trigger: 15M close above 0.0032356 with volume
First objective: 0.0032836
I’m not chasing the current price before the breakout. The risk/reward is not attractive enough in the middle of the setup.
If $1000PEPE closes above 0.0032356 with real volume, I’ll reassess the continuation trade.
If the breakout fails and price loses the 0.00319 area, the setup goes back to watchlist.
Keep $1000PEPE on the chart and trade only after the breakout confirms.
Not financial advice. Manage risk and use a size you can afford to lose.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
$MOODENG is pressing 0.04457 after a strong 1H expansion from the 0.0346 area.
The trend is bullish. The entry is not confirmed yet.
I’m watching one level:
Breakout trigger: 1H close above 0.04457 with volume
Entry: 0.0446-0.0449 after confirmation/retest
Invalidation: lose 0.0420 after the breakout
The 7 EMA is around 0.0420, while the 25 EMA and Supertrend remain well below price.
I would not chase the current candle directly under resistance.
If $MOODENG closes above 0.04457 with volume, check the chart for the confirmed continuation setup.
No close, no breakout trade.
Not financial advice. Manage risk and use a size you can afford to lose.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
The trend is bullish. The entry is not confirmed yet.
I’m watching one level:
Breakout trigger: 1H close above 0.04457 with volume
Entry: 0.0446-0.0449 after confirmation/retest
Invalidation: lose 0.0420 after the breakout
The 7 EMA is around 0.0420, while the 25 EMA and Supertrend remain well below price.
I would not chase the current candle directly under resistance.
If $MOODENG closes above 0.04457 with volume, check the chart for the confirmed continuation setup.
No close, no breakout trade.
Not financial advice. Manage risk and use a size you can afford to lose.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
$COLLECT just made a sharp 1H expansion from 0.0483 to 0.06478, then pulled back from the high.
The broader structure has improved, but I don’t see a clean entry at 0.0600.
I’m watching two levels:
Above 0.06478: a confirmed 1H breakout could reopen the continuation setup.
0.0544-0.0534: this is the support zone I want to see hold if $COLLECT pulls back deeper.
For now, the middle around 0.0600 is not where I want to force a trade.
Keep $COLLECT on the chart and check it again when one of these levels gives a confirmed reaction.
No setup is still a valid setup.
Not financial advice. Manage risk and use a size you can afford to lose.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
The broader structure has improved, but I don’t see a clean entry at 0.0600.
I’m watching two levels:
Above 0.06478: a confirmed 1H breakout could reopen the continuation setup.
0.0544-0.0534: this is the support zone I want to see hold if $COLLECT pulls back deeper.
For now, the middle around 0.0600 is not where I want to force a trade.
Keep $COLLECT on the chart and check it again when one of these levels gives a confirmed reaction.
No setup is still a valid setup.
Not financial advice. Manage risk and use a size you can afford to lose.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
$XPL is bullish, but 0.0835-0.0845 is the zone I want to see.
LONG on a confirmed retest.
Entry: 0.0835-0.0845
SL: 0.0810
TP: 0.0905 / 0.0950
At 0.08875, I would not chase.
Watch the retest before trading $XPL
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
LONG on a confirmed retest.
Entry: 0.0835-0.0845
SL: 0.0810
TP: 0.0905 / 0.0950
At 0.08875, I would not chase.
Watch the retest before trading $XPL
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
$GOAT is holding its breakout zone.
🟢 LONG above $0.01561
Entry: $0.01555-$0.01570
TP: $0.01610 / $0.01660
SL: $0.01510
EMA structure remains bullish, while price is consolidating below the recent high.
No breakout, no trade.
Wait for the level to confirm before entering.
Not financial advice. Manage risk.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
🟢 LONG above $0.01561
Entry: $0.01555-$0.01570
TP: $0.01610 / $0.01660
SL: $0.01510
EMA structure remains bullish, while price is consolidating below the recent high.
No breakout, no trade.
Wait for the level to confirm before entering.
Not financial advice. Manage risk.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
$XRP just pushed into 1.30 after a powerful 1H expansion.
The trend is clearly bullish. The entry is the difficult part.
Price is now sitting near 1.3017 while already stretched well above the 7 EMA around 1.23.
I’m watching two paths:
Above 1.3017: a clean 1H break and hold with volume could confirm another continuation move.
1.23-1.20 pullback: a controlled retrace followed by a bullish reaction would offer a cleaner risk-defined entry.
Invalidation: 1H close below 1.1978.
I would not chase 1.30 after this vertical move.
Check $XRP when one of these conditions confirms. The trend can stay bullish without every price being a good entry.
Not financial advice. Manage risk and use a size you can afford to lose.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
The trend is clearly bullish. The entry is the difficult part.
Price is now sitting near 1.3017 while already stretched well above the 7 EMA around 1.23.
I’m watching two paths:
Above 1.3017: a clean 1H break and hold with volume could confirm another continuation move.
1.23-1.20 pullback: a controlled retrace followed by a bullish reaction would offer a cleaner risk-defined entry.
Invalidation: 1H close below 1.1978.
I would not chase 1.30 after this vertical move.
Check $XRP when one of these conditions confirms. The trend can stay bullish without every price being a good entry.
Not financial advice. Manage risk and use a size you can afford to lose.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
Binance Agent OS: AI Agents Can Now Connect Directly to Binance
Binance just launched Binance Agent OS, and the interesting part is not just the MCP integration.
It is a broader developer platform that brings together Binance APIs, Wallet Agentic Hub, x402, Skill Hub, and MCP into one ecosystem for building AI-powered crypto applications.
The Binance MCP Server gives compatible AI applications a standardized way to access supported Binance capabilities, subject to user authorization and account eligibility.
Depending on the permissions granted, an agent can:
• Read market data such as tickers, order books, candlesticks and funding rates
• Check Agentic sub-account balances and positions
• Trade supported Spot, Margin, Convert, USDⓈ-M Futures and COIN-M Futures products
One detail I think matters a lot: there is no withdrawal permission through the MCP integration. Agents cannot withdraw funds to external addresses.
The access is also isolated through a dedicated Agentic sub-account, so users should only fund it with assets they are comfortable making available for authorized agent activity.
Compatible AI tools currently include Claude, Claude Code, Codex, ChatGPT and VS Code.
For developers, this could make Binance integrations much less fragmented. Instead of building separate connections for every agent workflow, MCP provides a common layer for discovering and using supported Binance tools.
For users, the bigger question is how much control they want to give an AI agent over their account.
AI can automate actions, but permissions still matter. Always review what an agent is authorized to do before connecting or approving transactions.
Binance Agent OS: https://www.binance.com/en/support/announcement/detail/07d45cdd3831498f8a4ff339031a8480
#Binance #BinanceAgentOS #MCP #AIAgents
Binance just launched Binance Agent OS, and the interesting part is not just the MCP integration.
It is a broader developer platform that brings together Binance APIs, Wallet Agentic Hub, x402, Skill Hub, and MCP into one ecosystem for building AI-powered crypto applications.
The Binance MCP Server gives compatible AI applications a standardized way to access supported Binance capabilities, subject to user authorization and account eligibility.
Depending on the permissions granted, an agent can:
• Read market data such as tickers, order books, candlesticks and funding rates
• Check Agentic sub-account balances and positions
• Trade supported Spot, Margin, Convert, USDⓈ-M Futures and COIN-M Futures products
One detail I think matters a lot: there is no withdrawal permission through the MCP integration. Agents cannot withdraw funds to external addresses.
The access is also isolated through a dedicated Agentic sub-account, so users should only fund it with assets they are comfortable making available for authorized agent activity.
Compatible AI tools currently include Claude, Claude Code, Codex, ChatGPT and VS Code.
For developers, this could make Binance integrations much less fragmented. Instead of building separate connections for every agent workflow, MCP provides a common layer for discovering and using supported Binance tools.
For users, the bigger question is how much control they want to give an AI agent over their account.
AI can automate actions, but permissions still matter. Always review what an agent is authorized to do before connecting or approving transactions.
Binance Agent OS: https://www.binance.com/en/support/announcement/detail/07d45cdd3831498f8a4ff339031a8480
#Binance #BinanceAgentOS #MCP #AIAgents
$ORDI is recovering after dropping from 4.432 into the 4.10 area.
The 15M chart is starting to improve. Price has reclaimed the 7 EMA and 25 EMA, but the bigger confirmation is still missing.
I’m watching 4.295.
Trigger: 15M close above 4.295 with improving volume
Entry: 4.295-4.33 after confirmation/retest
TP: 4.400 / 4.432
SL: 4.16
The Supertrend is still sitting around 4.400, so I want to see buyers clear that resistance before calling this a full continuation setup.
If 4.16 breaks on a 15M close, I would cancel the recovery thesis.
Check $ORDI when 4.295 is reclaimed with confirmation. Until then, I’m watching rather than chasing.
Not financial advice. Manage risk and use a size you can afford to lose.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
The 15M chart is starting to improve. Price has reclaimed the 7 EMA and 25 EMA, but the bigger confirmation is still missing.
I’m watching 4.295.
Trigger: 15M close above 4.295 with improving volume
Entry: 4.295-4.33 after confirmation/retest
TP: 4.400 / 4.432
SL: 4.16
The Supertrend is still sitting around 4.400, so I want to see buyers clear that resistance before calling this a full continuation setup.
If 4.16 breaks on a 15M close, I would cancel the recovery thesis.
Check $ORDI when 4.295 is reclaimed with confirmation. Until then, I’m watching rather than chasing.
Not financial advice. Manage risk and use a size you can afford to lose.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
$MON is recovering from a higher low after pulling back from 0.02701.
The 15M structure still looks constructive. Price is back above the 7 EMA, while the 25 EMA and Supertrend remain below.
I’m watching the pullback zone rather than chasing the current candle.
Entry zone: 0.0260-0.02625
Trigger: Bullish reaction while the zone holds
TP: 0.02701 / 0.02711+
SL: 0.02520
If $MON loses 0.02520 on a 15M close, the continuation thesis is invalid.
The cleaner trade is the higher-low setup. If price runs straight into 0.02701, I’d rather wait than chase.
Check $MON if it returns to the entry zone and confirms the higher low.
Not financial advice. Manage risk and use a size you can afford to lose.
The 15M structure still looks constructive. Price is back above the 7 EMA, while the 25 EMA and Supertrend remain below.
I’m watching the pullback zone rather than chasing the current candle.
Entry zone: 0.0260-0.02625
Trigger: Bullish reaction while the zone holds
TP: 0.02701 / 0.02711+
SL: 0.02520
If $MON loses 0.02520 on a 15M close, the continuation thesis is invalid.
The cleaner trade is the higher-low setup. If price runs straight into 0.02701, I’d rather wait than chase.
Check $MON if it returns to the entry zone and confirms the higher low.
Not financial advice. Manage risk and use a size you can afford to lose.
$PEOPLE just broke out of its 15M accumulation range with a major volume expansion.
The breakout is confirmed. The entry is what matters now.
Price already pushed to 0.009557, so I would not chase 0.00944 after the impulse.
Retest zone: 0.00925-0.00935
Trigger: Hold the zone after the breakout
TP: 0.00964 / 0.01000
SL: 0.00900
The 7 EMA is around 0.00910, while Supertrend remains bullish near 0.00893.
If the breakout holds on the retest, $PEOPLE could have room for another expansion. If 0.00900 breaks on a 15M close, I would cancel the long thesis.
Check $PEOPLE on the retest and trade only if the breakout structure holds.
Not financial advice. Manage risk and use a size you can afford to lose.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
The breakout is confirmed. The entry is what matters now.
Price already pushed to 0.009557, so I would not chase 0.00944 after the impulse.
Retest zone: 0.00925-0.00935
Trigger: Hold the zone after the breakout
TP: 0.00964 / 0.01000
SL: 0.00900
The 7 EMA is around 0.00910, while Supertrend remains bullish near 0.00893.
If the breakout holds on the retest, $PEOPLE could have room for another expansion. If 0.00900 breaks on a 15M close, I would cancel the long thesis.
Check $PEOPLE on the retest and trade only if the breakout structure holds.
Not financial advice. Manage risk and use a size you can afford to lose.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
$USELESS is compressing just below 0.04947 after a strong 15M breakout.
The interesting part is that price has not been aggressively rejected from the high. Instead, candles are tightening around 0.048 while the broader structure remains bullish.
I’m watching the compression:
Breakout trigger: 15M close above 0.04947 with volume
Entry: 0.0495-0.0498 after confirmation/retest
TP1: 0.04992
SL: 0.0475
If 0.04756 breaks on a 15M close, I would cancel the breakout idea.
This is a wait-for-expansion setup, not a chase at 0.048.
Check $USELESS when 0.04947 breaks and trade only if the volume confirms the move.
Not financial advice. Manage risk and use a size you can afford to lose.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
The interesting part is that price has not been aggressively rejected from the high. Instead, candles are tightening around 0.048 while the broader structure remains bullish.
I’m watching the compression:
Breakout trigger: 15M close above 0.04947 with volume
Entry: 0.0495-0.0498 after confirmation/retest
TP1: 0.04992
SL: 0.0475
If 0.04756 breaks on a 15M close, I would cancel the breakout idea.
This is a wait-for-expansion setup, not a chase at 0.048.
Check $USELESS when 0.04947 breaks and trade only if the volume confirms the move.
Not financial advice. Manage risk and use a size you can afford to lose.
⇢ Click here to Trade 👇️
Connectez-vous pour découvrir plus de contenu