BlockBeast_Official
16.5k Publications
BlockBeast_Official
Compte Square Vérifié+X: @Ericledger0 BINANCE KOLCRYPTO IS MORE THAN MONEY — IT’S FREEDOM, TECHNOLOGY, AND A NEW FINANCIAL SYSTEM.
Ouvert au trading
Trade fréquemment
2 an(s)
683 Suivis
38.0K+ Abonnés
36.3K+ J’aime
Publications
Portefeuille
Tous
Citations
Vidéos
Direct
$BTC IS KNOCKING ON THE $80K DOOR 🚪🔥
Bitcoin is moving with serious momentum.
$BTC /USDT is trading around 79,712.2, up 3.10%, after pushing toward the 79,999.1 24H high. The move is backed by strong activity, with 833.41M in 24H turnover.
The 1H structure is clearly bullish:
• MA7: 78,873.8
• MA14: 78,034.6
• MA28: 77,723.0
Price is holding above all three averages, showing buyers remain in control.
But here’s the interesting part 👀
RSI6 is at 71.60, RSI12 at 67.78, and RSI24 at 63.74. Williams %R is also around -8.8, meaning BTC is stretched in the short term.
So I’m watching $80,000 very closely.
A clean breakout and hold above that psychological level could keep the momentum alive. If rejection appears, a pullback toward the moving-average zone would be the key area to watch.
For now, the trend is bullish — but chasing the top is where patience matters most. ⚡
$BTC
Bitcoin is moving with serious momentum.
$BTC /USDT is trading around 79,712.2, up 3.10%, after pushing toward the 79,999.1 24H high. The move is backed by strong activity, with 833.41M in 24H turnover.
The 1H structure is clearly bullish:
• MA7: 78,873.8
• MA14: 78,034.6
• MA28: 77,723.0
Price is holding above all three averages, showing buyers remain in control.
But here’s the interesting part 👀
RSI6 is at 71.60, RSI12 at 67.78, and RSI24 at 63.74. Williams %R is also around -8.8, meaning BTC is stretched in the short term.
So I’m watching $80,000 very closely.
A clean breakout and hold above that psychological level could keep the momentum alive. If rejection appears, a pullback toward the moving-average zone would be the key area to watch.
For now, the trend is bullish — but chasing the top is where patience matters most. ⚡
$BTC
Avoirs $SOL 0.2 USDT
$SOL is pressing directly into the level that can decide the next move.
After climbing from the $91.54 area, SOL has built a clear sequence of higher lows and stronger pushes on the 1H chart. Now price is sitting at $97.44, just beneath the visible 24H high of $97.60.
That makes the current zone interesting — but also dangerous to chase.
$SOL /USDT — 1H Setup
Market Bias: Bullish continuation
Current Price: $97.44
Key Resistance: $97.60
Potential Entry Zone: $96.08–$96.40 on a controlled pullback/retest
TP1: $97.60
Key Confirmation: 1H acceptance above $97.60
Major Support: $94.57
Deeper Invalidation Area: Below the recent $91.54 swing low
The important part of this chart isn't simply that SOL is green. The structure underneath the move is improving.
Price recovered from the $91.54 low, pushed back through $94.57, consolidated, and then started producing stronger upside candles. The latest move carried SOL through the $96.08 area and into $97.60 resistance.
Momentum indicators are also leaning bullish. MACD is positive with DIF around 0.53 versus DEA around 0.28, while the histogram has turned positive. That supports the idea that buyers currently have control.
There is one warning, though.
RSI14 is around 74.61 and KDJ's J value is near 98.86. Momentum is strong, but the short-term move is already stretched. If SOL gets rejected around $97.60, a pullback toward the $96.08 region would not automatically destroy the bullish structure. In fact, a clean retest there could provide a healthier setup than buying directly into resistance.
The real breakout signal would be a convincing 1H close above $97.60 followed by price holding that level as support. Without that confirmation, traders should be careful with late entries because rejection from the high could produce a quick retracement.
I would rather see SOL prove that $97.60 has flipped than assume the breakout before it happens.
For this chart, patience matters more than prediction. Let the resistance reveal whether buyers can actually take control — $SOL
After climbing from the $91.54 area, SOL has built a clear sequence of higher lows and stronger pushes on the 1H chart. Now price is sitting at $97.44, just beneath the visible 24H high of $97.60.
That makes the current zone interesting — but also dangerous to chase.
$SOL /USDT — 1H Setup
Market Bias: Bullish continuation
Current Price: $97.44
Key Resistance: $97.60
Potential Entry Zone: $96.08–$96.40 on a controlled pullback/retest
TP1: $97.60
Key Confirmation: 1H acceptance above $97.60
Major Support: $94.57
Deeper Invalidation Area: Below the recent $91.54 swing low
The important part of this chart isn't simply that SOL is green. The structure underneath the move is improving.
Price recovered from the $91.54 low, pushed back through $94.57, consolidated, and then started producing stronger upside candles. The latest move carried SOL through the $96.08 area and into $97.60 resistance.
Momentum indicators are also leaning bullish. MACD is positive with DIF around 0.53 versus DEA around 0.28, while the histogram has turned positive. That supports the idea that buyers currently have control.
There is one warning, though.
RSI14 is around 74.61 and KDJ's J value is near 98.86. Momentum is strong, but the short-term move is already stretched. If SOL gets rejected around $97.60, a pullback toward the $96.08 region would not automatically destroy the bullish structure. In fact, a clean retest there could provide a healthier setup than buying directly into resistance.
The real breakout signal would be a convincing 1H close above $97.60 followed by price holding that level as support. Without that confirmation, traders should be careful with late entries because rejection from the high could produce a quick retracement.
I would rather see SOL prove that $97.60 has flipped than assume the breakout before it happens.
For this chart, patience matters more than prediction. Let the resistance reveal whether buyers can actually take control — $SOL
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
What if the most important part of a private financial transaction is not what gets published, but what stays hidden?
That’s an interesting way to look at @Dusk.
Dusk is positioning its blockchain around regulated onchain finance, where privacy is not treated as a separate feature added later. Its architecture combines public and confidential transaction models, selective disclosure, identity controls, and deterministic settlement.
One detail I find especially interesting is the separation between visibility and verification.
For example, a regulated asset workflow may need to prove that a participant is eligible without exposing every piece of their personal information publicly. Dusk’s Citadel 2 is designed around this idea: a user can prove possession of a valid credential with a zero-knowledge proof while keeping the underlying attributes off-chain.
That connects directly with Dusk’s broader design: some information can remain public, some can stay shielded, and specific information can be disclosed to authorized parties when required.
The latest Dusk update also focuses on tokenization and private-market financing, highlighting the full ownership lifecycle rather than treating tokenization as simply putting an asset on a blockchain.
So the interesting question isn’t simply “Can finance move onchain?”
It’s whether blockchains can give financial markets the right visibility, to the right people, at the right time.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
What if the most important part of a private financial transaction is not what gets published, but what stays hidden?
That’s an interesting way to look at @Dusk.
Dusk is positioning its blockchain around regulated onchain finance, where privacy is not treated as a separate feature added later. Its architecture combines public and confidential transaction models, selective disclosure, identity controls, and deterministic settlement.
One detail I find especially interesting is the separation between visibility and verification.
For example, a regulated asset workflow may need to prove that a participant is eligible without exposing every piece of their personal information publicly. Dusk’s Citadel 2 is designed around this idea: a user can prove possession of a valid credential with a zero-knowledge proof while keeping the underlying attributes off-chain.
That connects directly with Dusk’s broader design: some information can remain public, some can stay shielded, and specific information can be disclosed to authorized parties when required.
The latest Dusk update also focuses on tokenization and private-market financing, highlighting the full ownership lifecycle rather than treating tokenization as simply putting an asset on a blockchain.
So the interesting question isn’t simply “Can finance move onchain?”
It’s whether blockchains can give financial markets the right visibility, to the right people, at the right time.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
#termmax @TermMax
The interesting part of TermMax lender orders: your USDC doesn’t necessarily sit idle while waiting for a borrower.
While unmatched, the capital can earn Morpho’s base yield. Once a borrower matches your fixed quote, it moves into the fixed-rate position.
So the lender experience is basically:
Wait → earn base yield → match → lock fixed rate
That makes the matching phase an important part of TermMax’s design, not just dead time.
The interesting part of TermMax lender orders: your USDC doesn’t necessarily sit idle while waiting for a borrower.
While unmatched, the capital can earn Morpho’s base yield. Once a borrower matches your fixed quote, it moves into the fixed-rate position.
So the lender experience is basically:
Wait → earn base yield → match → lock fixed rate
That makes the matching phase an important part of TermMax’s design, not just dead time.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Most people look at Dusk’s lending from the interest-rate side.
I think the more interesting part is the order itself.
Imagine a lender wants to lend USDC, but only at a specific rate. Instead of immediately accepting the market, they can place a limit order and wait for someone who agrees to those terms.
While nobody has matched it yet, the USDC can earn Morpho’s base yield.
Then a borrower accepts the order.
That’s where the position changes: the lending deal becomes fixed-rate, and the lender receives a Fixed-Rate Token (FT).
So the journey is:
Set your rate → wait for a match → earn base yield → get matched → enter the fixed-rate position.
The interesting part isn’t just the fixed rate.
It’s how Dusk gives the lender control over when the floating waiting phase ends and the fixed-rate deal begins.
$ONG
$BOME
Most people look at Dusk’s lending from the interest-rate side.
I think the more interesting part is the order itself.
Imagine a lender wants to lend USDC, but only at a specific rate. Instead of immediately accepting the market, they can place a limit order and wait for someone who agrees to those terms.
While nobody has matched it yet, the USDC can earn Morpho’s base yield.
Then a borrower accepts the order.
That’s where the position changes: the lending deal becomes fixed-rate, and the lender receives a Fixed-Rate Token (FT).
So the journey is:
Set your rate → wait for a match → earn base yield → get matched → enter the fixed-rate position.
The interesting part isn’t just the fixed rate.
It’s how Dusk gives the lender control over when the floating waiting phase ends and the fixed-rate deal begins.
$ONG
$BOME
📈 Breakout confirmation
0%
🛡️ Strong support holding
0%
📊 Volume picking up
0%
🔄 Trend reversal
0%
0 Votes • Vote fermé
#termmax @TermMax
The part of TermMax I find interesting
A lender on TermMax can place a limit order for a fixed rate, but the money doesn’t necessarily sit there doing nothing while waiting for a match.
Before matching, USDC can earn Morpho’s base yield. Once a borrower matches the order, it switches into the agreed fixed-rate structure.
So I see it as two stages: floating yield while waiting, fixed yield after matching.
That small detail makes TermMax’s lending model much easier to understand.
The part of TermMax I find interesting
A lender on TermMax can place a limit order for a fixed rate, but the money doesn’t necessarily sit there doing nothing while waiting for a match.
Before matching, USDC can earn Morpho’s base yield. Once a borrower matches the order, it switches into the agreed fixed-rate structure.
So I see it as two stages: floating yield while waiting, fixed yield after matching.
That small detail makes TermMax’s lending model much easier to understand.
Dusk: The interesting part is the waiting period
One useful way to understand fixed-rate lending is what happens before a lender gets matched. The quote can remain fixed while the order is waiting, rather than behaving like a constantly changing floating rate.
For USDC, the unmatched liquidity can still earn Morpho’s base yield before a fixed-rate match happens. Once matched, the lender moves into the fixed-rate structure, while the borrower gets predictable financing terms.
That separation between “waiting yield” and “matched fixed yield” is a small detail, but it makes Dusk’s lending mechanics much easier to understand.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
$SKYAI
$MAGMA
One useful way to understand fixed-rate lending is what happens before a lender gets matched. The quote can remain fixed while the order is waiting, rather than behaving like a constantly changing floating rate.
For USDC, the unmatched liquidity can still earn Morpho’s base yield before a fixed-rate match happens. Once matched, the lender moves into the fixed-rate structure, while the borrower gets predictable financing terms.
That separation between “waiting yield” and “matched fixed yield” is a small detail, but it makes Dusk’s lending mechanics much easier to understand.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
$SKYAI
$MAGMA
📈 Market trend
50%
🧱 Support & resistance
17%
⚡ Volume & momentum
0%
🛡️ Risk management
33%
6 Votes • Vote fermé
#termmax @TermMax
TermMax has an interesting mechanic: an unmatched lender limit order doesn’t necessarily mean idle USDC.
Your fixed quote can stay at the rate you chose, while the USDC earns floating yield through the underlying Morpho strategy until a borrower matches it.
So the lender is basically saying:
“I’ll wait for 10% fixed, but I don’t want my capital doing nothing while I wait.”
That separation between quote rate and capital yield is the part I find most interesting.
TermMax has an interesting mechanic: an unmatched lender limit order doesn’t necessarily mean idle USDC.
Your fixed quote can stay at the rate you chose, while the USDC earns floating yield through the underlying Morpho strategy until a borrower matches it.
So the lender is basically saying:
“I’ll wait for 10% fixed, but I don’t want my capital doing nothing while I wait.”
That separation between quote rate and capital yield is the part I find most interesting.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Was digging through Dusk Network's docs last night, not really looking for anything specific, just trying to understand what makes it different from the ten other "privacy chain" projects out there. Then I hit the part about XSC, the Confidential Security Contract standard, and I had to stop scrolling for a second.
Most privacy chains I've looked at treat privacy as a bolt-on. Shield the transaction, hide the amount, call it done. But XSC is built specifically for regulated financial instruments, contracts that need to stay confidential from the public but still provable to an auditor or regulator when required. That's a weirdly narrow and specific thing to optimize for, and it made me realize this isn't a "hide everything from everyone" chain. It's a "show the right thing to the right person" chain.
That distinction actually bugged me for a bit. I've always assumed privacy and compliance were opposites, like you pick one and lose the other. Seeing @DuskFoundation try to make them coexist at the protocol level, not as an afterthought, made me rethink what "privacy blockchain" even means. It's not about secrecy for its own sake. It's about controlled disclosure, which is basically how real finance already works.
I don't know if DUSK ends up being the chain that institutions actually use for this stuff. That's a much bigger question than one afternoon of reading docs can answer. But it left me with a genuine question I keep turning over: if confidentiality and compliance can actually live on the same chain, why did we spend so long assuming they couldn't?
Poll:
Can privacy and compliance coexist on the same blockchain?
$BTW
$ACE
Was digging through Dusk Network's docs last night, not really looking for anything specific, just trying to understand what makes it different from the ten other "privacy chain" projects out there. Then I hit the part about XSC, the Confidential Security Contract standard, and I had to stop scrolling for a second.
Most privacy chains I've looked at treat privacy as a bolt-on. Shield the transaction, hide the amount, call it done. But XSC is built specifically for regulated financial instruments, contracts that need to stay confidential from the public but still provable to an auditor or regulator when required. That's a weirdly narrow and specific thing to optimize for, and it made me realize this isn't a "hide everything from everyone" chain. It's a "show the right thing to the right person" chain.
That distinction actually bugged me for a bit. I've always assumed privacy and compliance were opposites, like you pick one and lose the other. Seeing @DuskFoundation try to make them coexist at the protocol level, not as an afterthought, made me rethink what "privacy blockchain" even means. It's not about secrecy for its own sake. It's about controlled disclosure, which is basically how real finance already works.
I don't know if DUSK ends up being the chain that institutions actually use for this stuff. That's a much bigger question than one afternoon of reading docs can answer. But it left me with a genuine question I keep turning over: if confidentiality and compliance can actually live on the same chain, why did we spend so long assuming they couldn't?
Poll:
Can privacy and compliance coexist on the same blockchain?
$BTW
$ACE
🔹 Yes, that’s the future
0%
🔹 Maybe, still early
0%
🔹 No, they conflict
0%
0 Votes • Vote fermé
#termmax @TermMax
I was checking out @TermMax today and something simple caught my attention.
It combines fixed-rate borrowing and lending with options trading in a decentralized way. What I found interesting is the focus on having more certainty around rates instead of dealing with constant changes.
That made me look at $TMAX a little differently.
DeFi is already complicated enough, so I like projects that try to make one part of the experience easier to understand and manage.
The more I looked into TermMax, the more I wondered if predictable rates could become a bigger part of how people use DeFi.
Sometimes the simple idea is the one worth watching.
I was checking out @TermMax today and something simple caught my attention.
It combines fixed-rate borrowing and lending with options trading in a decentralized way. What I found interesting is the focus on having more certainty around rates instead of dealing with constant changes.
That made me look at $TMAX a little differently.
DeFi is already complicated enough, so I like projects that try to make one part of the experience easier to understand and manage.
The more I looked into TermMax, the more I wondered if predictable rates could become a bigger part of how people use DeFi.
Sometimes the simple idea is the one worth watching.
I was looking into $DUSK today and one thing stood out to me.
Dusk Network isn’t just calling itself another privacy chain. It’s a Layer-1 built around financial applications, with the Confidential Security Contract (XSC) standard and confidential smart contracts at the core.
That made me stop for a moment. Privacy in crypto often gets treated like a feature, but for financial systems, it can be much closer to a requirement.
The more I looked at @DuskNetwork, the more I started seeing the project less as “another L1” and more as an attempt to make blockchain-based finance work without putting every detail on public display.
Maybe that’s the part people overlook.
I’m curious whether privacy-focused infrastructure like $DUSK becomes more important as traditional finance moves deeper on-chain.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
Dusk Network isn’t just calling itself another privacy chain. It’s a Layer-1 built around financial applications, with the Confidential Security Contract (XSC) standard and confidential smart contracts at the core.
That made me stop for a moment. Privacy in crypto often gets treated like a feature, but for financial systems, it can be much closer to a requirement.
The more I looked at @DuskNetwork, the more I started seeing the project less as “another L1” and more as an attempt to make blockchain-based finance work without putting every detail on public display.
Maybe that’s the part people overlook.
I’m curious whether privacy-focused infrastructure like $DUSK becomes more important as traditional finance moves deeper on-chain.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
I’m watching TermMax and one thing caught my attention: it lets borrowers lock in a fixed rate instead of dealing with a rate that keeps moving.
I’m looking at this more closely because the simple part is easy to understand, but the real interesting part is how these fixed-rate positions behave as they get closer to maturity.
I’m still checking how the borrowing and lending sides react when market conditions change.
For me, that’s the part worth watching next.
@TermMax #TermMax
I’m looking at this more closely because the simple part is easy to understand, but the real interesting part is how these fixed-rate positions behave as they get closer to maturity.
I’m still checking how the borrowing and lending sides react when market conditions change.
For me, that’s the part worth watching next.
@TermMax #TermMax
I was checking out DUSK again and one thing caught my attention: Dusk isn’t just talking about privacy as a feature. It’s building a Layer-1 around financial applications where confidential smart contracts are part of the core idea.
That made me look at @DuskFoundation a little differently.
I usually think of blockchain privacy as “hide the data,” but for finance, it feels more like controlling what needs to be visible and what doesn’t.
The more I looked into it, the more I started wondering if that distinction could become one of the bigger pieces of blockchain infrastructure over time.
Sometimes the interesting part of a project isn’t what it adds, but what it chooses not to expose.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
$ACE
$GPS
That made me look at @DuskFoundation a little differently.
I usually think of blockchain privacy as “hide the data,” but for finance, it feels more like controlling what needs to be visible and what doesn’t.
The more I looked into it, the more I started wondering if that distinction could become one of the bigger pieces of blockchain infrastructure over time.
Sometimes the interesting part of a project isn’t what it adds, but what it chooses not to expose.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
$ACE
$GPS
Dusk Network: Controlled Visibility
Financial infrastructure shouldn’t force institutions to choose between transparency and confidentiality.
Dusk Network is building a privacy-focused Layer-1 where financial activity can remain protected while still being selectively verifiable.
Public when transparency matters.
Private when sensitive data needs protection.
Verifiable when regulators need proof.
With confidential smart contracts, selective disclosure, programmable compliance, and deterministic settlement, Dusk is focused on bringing privacy and regulatory requirements into the same financial infrastructure.
That’s not about hiding finance.
It’s about controlling who can see what, and when.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
$AIO
$PORTAL
Financial infrastructure shouldn’t force institutions to choose between transparency and confidentiality.
Dusk Network is building a privacy-focused Layer-1 where financial activity can remain protected while still being selectively verifiable.
Public when transparency matters.
Private when sensitive data needs protection.
Verifiable when regulators need proof.
With confidential smart contracts, selective disclosure, programmable compliance, and deterministic settlement, Dusk is focused on bringing privacy and regulatory requirements into the same financial infrastructure.
That’s not about hiding finance.
It’s about controlling who can see what, and when.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
$AIO
$PORTAL
Dusk Network: Privacy That Finance Actually Needs
I’ve been watching crypto long enough to know that every new trend sounds amazing at first. Then the hype fades and we find out what actually works.
That’s why Dusk Network caught my attention. It’s building a privacy-focused Layer-1 for financial applications, with confidential smart contracts through its XSC standard.
The idea makes sense. Financial activity can’t always be fully public, especially when institutions are involved. Privacy and compliance both matter.
But I’m still cautious. Good technology doesn’t guarantee users, liquidity, or adoption. Dusk has an interesting path ahead, but now the real question is simple: will people actually use it?
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
I’ve been watching crypto long enough to know that every new trend sounds amazing at first. Then the hype fades and we find out what actually works.
That’s why Dusk Network caught my attention. It’s building a privacy-focused Layer-1 for financial applications, with confidential smart contracts through its XSC standard.
The idea makes sense. Financial activity can’t always be fully public, especially when institutions are involved. Privacy and compliance both matter.
But I’m still cautious. Good technology doesn’t guarantee users, liquidity, or adoption. Dusk has an interesting path ahead, but now the real question is simple: will people actually use it?
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
Dusk Network: Great Infrastructure Means Nothing If Nobody Shows Up
I’m tired of watching crypto rename the same ideas and call it innovation. Every cycle brings another shiny narrative, while the boring problem remains: nobody cares about infrastructure until people actually use it.
Dusk is interesting because it’s trying to build privacy infrastructure for financial applications, not just another chain chasing attention. But technology alone doesn’t guarantee adoption.
Liquidity, users, developers and real demand are the hard part. I’m cautiously watching Dusk. It might quietly become useful, or the infrastructure might be ready while nobody shows up.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
I’m tired of watching crypto rename the same ideas and call it innovation. Every cycle brings another shiny narrative, while the boring problem remains: nobody cares about infrastructure until people actually use it.
Dusk is interesting because it’s trying to build privacy infrastructure for financial applications, not just another chain chasing attention. But technology alone doesn’t guarantee adoption.
Liquidity, users, developers and real demand are the hard part. I’m cautiously watching Dusk. It might quietly become useful, or the infrastructure might be ready while nobody shows up.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
I'm watching $SOL , and it is showing bullish momentum after a strong recovery from the $72.37 area toward the $77.86 swing high. Price is now consolidating around $76.11, while buyers are still holding the recent higher-price structure.
This setup matters because SOL is trading below the visible $77.08 24h high and $77.86 resistance. A clean move above these levels would show buyers regaining control. On the downside, $75.39 is the key nearby level visible on the chart.
Discipline matters here: avoid chasing candles after a sharp move. Waiting for confirmation around support or resistance can help reduce emotional entries.
Coin: $SOL
Position: LONG
Entry Price (EP): $75.40–$76.10
TP1: $77.08
TP2: $77.86
TP3: No clear third level visible
Stop Loss (SL): $75.39
Manage risk carefully, take partial profits gradually, and protect your capital. 📊
#SheinToStartHKIPOBookbuildingAsSoonAsNextWeek #KoreaApprovesTighterCryptoExchangeRules #BlackRockCanadaLaunchesBitcoinLinkedETF #TrumpDemandsCompensationFromIran #KeelClosesUSBitcoinMining
This setup matters because SOL is trading below the visible $77.08 24h high and $77.86 resistance. A clean move above these levels would show buyers regaining control. On the downside, $75.39 is the key nearby level visible on the chart.
Discipline matters here: avoid chasing candles after a sharp move. Waiting for confirmation around support or resistance can help reduce emotional entries.
Coin: $SOL
Position: LONG
Entry Price (EP): $75.40–$76.10
TP1: $77.08
TP2: $77.86
TP3: No clear third level visible
Stop Loss (SL): $75.39
Manage risk carefully, take partial profits gradually, and protect your capital. 📊
#SheinToStartHKIPOBookbuildingAsSoonAsNextWeek #KoreaApprovesTighterCryptoExchangeRules #BlackRockCanadaLaunchesBitcoinLinkedETF #TrumpDemandsCompensationFromIran #KeelClosesUSBitcoinMining
Connectez-vous pour découvrir plus de contenu