Azraciv23
7.8k Publications
Azraciv23
✊✨🦋Every action has a direct and opposite reaction
#BinanceTurns7 task 2
#BinanceTurns7
Ouvert au trading
Trade fréquemment
2.9 an(s)
4.0K+ Suivis
25.3K+ Abonnés
26.6K+ J’aime
2 Badges
Publications
Portefeuille
Tous
Citations
Vidéos
Direct
$BNB
$BTC
$ETH
WTF ?
BTC, ETH , SOL, BNB ... all the big ones are fully awake !
We have BTc above 68k, -68876 at this moment
ETH finally above $2099
BNB above $620
Sol at 85
And the charts look almost identical! Is this moment going to last or we go back to the bear soon ?
$BTC
$ETH
WTF ?
BTC, ETH , SOL, BNB ... all the big ones are fully awake !
We have BTc above 68k, -68876 at this moment
ETH finally above $2099
BNB above $620
Sol at 85
And the charts look almost identical! Is this moment going to last or we go back to the bear soon ?
We gonna stay Bullish 🐂
We going back to Bearish 🐻
Don't care, let it play out 🫡
2 jour(s) restant(s)
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk I kept thinking the difference between tokenization and native issuance was mostly technical until I got deeper into how @Dusk describes it.
With tokenization, you can put a token onchain that represents an asset whose actual ownership record still lives somwhere else
Native issuance flips that around. The asset is created and managed onchain, so issuance, transfers, settlement and parts of the asset lifecycle can be built around the same ledger
That sounds cleaner to me, but it also raised a much bigger question.
If I buy a digitaly native share on Dusk, what actually makes that blockchain record the legal ownership record?
Because putting the asset onchain doesn't automatically change the law.
There still has to be a legal framework saying what that onchain record means, who is recognized as the owner, what happens if something goes wrong, and which institution or registry has authority when the legal and tekhnical records disagree.
That is the part I find more interesting than the usual “RWAs are coming onchain” discussion.
The hard problem might not be creating the asset onchain.
It might be getting the legal system to recognize that the onchain asset is the thing itself, rather than another represantation that has to point back to something sitting in an offchain database.
And if that actually works, then native issuance isn't just tokenization done differently.
It's a change in where the asset's source of truth lives.
With tokenization, you can put a token onchain that represents an asset whose actual ownership record still lives somwhere else
Native issuance flips that around. The asset is created and managed onchain, so issuance, transfers, settlement and parts of the asset lifecycle can be built around the same ledger
That sounds cleaner to me, but it also raised a much bigger question.
If I buy a digitaly native share on Dusk, what actually makes that blockchain record the legal ownership record?
Because putting the asset onchain doesn't automatically change the law.
There still has to be a legal framework saying what that onchain record means, who is recognized as the owner, what happens if something goes wrong, and which institution or registry has authority when the legal and tekhnical records disagree.
That is the part I find more interesting than the usual “RWAs are coming onchain” discussion.
The hard problem might not be creating the asset onchain.
It might be getting the legal system to recognize that the onchain asset is the thing itself, rather than another represantation that has to point back to something sitting in an offchain database.
And if that actually works, then native issuance isn't just tokenization done differently.
It's a change in where the asset's source of truth lives.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Honestly, looking at @Dusk I wonder why does Dusk need two confidential transaction systems instead of one?
I originally figured Hedger was just Zedger rebuilt for the EVM. Same privacy model, just repackaged in Solidity so developers wouldnt have to learn a new stack. Reading through both docs side by side, that explanation started to fall apart...
Looks like the actual difference comes down to the underlying architecture.
Zedger runs natively on UTXOs.
Hedger has to play by the EVM’s account based rules, and those rules put some limits on anonymity
Seems like a small implementation detail until you sit with it. Hedger and Zedger arent a native version and a ported version of the same system. They're two different answers to a similar problem, shaped by whatever execution model they are stuck operating inside.
Looking at Hedger again with that in mind, the point of combining homomorphic encryption with zero knowledge proofs isn t just bolting privacy onto the EVM
It's more about testing how far confidential functionality can be pushed while still playing by the EVM's rules.
Also thb,this changes how I think about DuskEVM as a choice. Picking EVM compatibility over native Dusk development isn t purely about whats conviniant to the devs. There s a privacy tradeoff sitting underneath that decision too.
I don t know yet how much that tradeoff ends up mattering once actual regulated transactions are moving through both systems,just saying I noticed it. Thats the part I want to watch.
$ACE $TUT
Honestly, looking at @Dusk I wonder why does Dusk need two confidential transaction systems instead of one?
I originally figured Hedger was just Zedger rebuilt for the EVM. Same privacy model, just repackaged in Solidity so developers wouldnt have to learn a new stack. Reading through both docs side by side, that explanation started to fall apart...
Looks like the actual difference comes down to the underlying architecture.
Zedger runs natively on UTXOs.
Hedger has to play by the EVM’s account based rules, and those rules put some limits on anonymity
Seems like a small implementation detail until you sit with it. Hedger and Zedger arent a native version and a ported version of the same system. They're two different answers to a similar problem, shaped by whatever execution model they are stuck operating inside.
Looking at Hedger again with that in mind, the point of combining homomorphic encryption with zero knowledge proofs isn t just bolting privacy onto the EVM
It's more about testing how far confidential functionality can be pushed while still playing by the EVM's rules.
Also thb,this changes how I think about DuskEVM as a choice. Picking EVM compatibility over native Dusk development isn t purely about whats conviniant to the devs. There s a privacy tradeoff sitting underneath that decision too.
I don t know yet how much that tradeoff ends up mattering once actual regulated transactions are moving through both systems,just saying I noticed it. Thats the part I want to watch.
$ACE $TUT
$DOLO
And The "Strangest chart Award " today goes toooo
😂
WTF
And I toaght $PORTAL has a strange pattern
It's so confusing where it's going is it trying to do symmetric looking fall , or it's gonna pull one over $0.02 and blow away everyone ?
I honestly can't decide 😅
And The "Strangest chart Award " today goes toooo
😂
WTF
And I toaght $PORTAL has a strange pattern
It's so confusing where it's going is it trying to do symmetric looking fall , or it's gonna pull one over $0.02 and blow away everyone ?
I honestly can't decide 😅
$HEMI
looks as it's calming down,
Same as the past days top gainers
like $COW
and
$ACE
They are all still listed as top gainers
but that's more old glory leftover,
as their charts sing a bearish song this time 🐻
looks as it's calming down,
Same as the past days top gainers
like $COW
and
$ACE
They are all still listed as top gainers
but that's more old glory leftover,
as their charts sing a bearish song this time 🐻
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
I think I confused myself reading @Dusk s piece on native issuance The idea is that an asset can be created and managed onchain, with ownership, transfers and settlement built around the same record
tbh, firs I thought the Dutch BV example in Dusk's native issuance piece was mainly about the legal requirements around regulated assets. but the more I looked at it, the more another question came to mind 🧠
#dusk is building for regulated markets where legal ownership still matters, but it also puts a lot of emphasis on privacy and selective disclosure.
A transfer of Dutch BV shares still requires a notarial deed, so there is still an identifiable legal process outside de the blockchain.
What caught my attention is HOW those two sides actually meet.
If the asset and its financial activity can stay private onchain, while a notary still needs to verify the parties and the legal transfer, what information does the notary actually need to see, and what can remain shielded? Naturaly, onchain assets and real world notary does not sound as a DeFi process, but may be seen as RegFi one?
I understand why the legal process exists I m more curious about how @Dusk 's selective disclosure fits around it
Where does the privacy line actually sit when a regulated asset still has to pass through a real world legal process?
#SP500TopsRecord7800 $SNDK $ACU
I think I confused myself reading @Dusk s piece on native issuance The idea is that an asset can be created and managed onchain, with ownership, transfers and settlement built around the same record
tbh, firs I thought the Dutch BV example in Dusk's native issuance piece was mainly about the legal requirements around regulated assets. but the more I looked at it, the more another question came to mind 🧠
#dusk is building for regulated markets where legal ownership still matters, but it also puts a lot of emphasis on privacy and selective disclosure.
A transfer of Dutch BV shares still requires a notarial deed, so there is still an identifiable legal process outside de the blockchain.
What caught my attention is HOW those two sides actually meet.
If the asset and its financial activity can stay private onchain, while a notary still needs to verify the parties and the legal transfer, what information does the notary actually need to see, and what can remain shielded? Naturaly, onchain assets and real world notary does not sound as a DeFi process, but may be seen as RegFi one?
I understand why the legal process exists I m more curious about how @Dusk 's selective disclosure fits around it
Where does the privacy line actually sit when a regulated asset still has to pass through a real world legal process?
#SP500TopsRecord7800 $SNDK $ACU
$GPS
GoPlusSecurity just shaved off one zero from it's price in a sudden attack of bullishness . 😅
Lot of suprices today on top gainers list ,
but also some good ol players like
$TUT
will GPS go down as fast as it went up ?
what you say ?
GoPlusSecurity just shaved off one zero from it's price in a sudden attack of bullishness . 😅
Lot of suprices today on top gainers list ,
but also some good ol players like
$TUT
will GPS go down as fast as it went up ?
what you say ?
So , here you can see me explaining why I think $SNDKB price will move up from $1654, and also saying that $MU & $SKHYNIX prices moving in the same direction show a sector moving , not just one stock .
Turns out I was right, SunDisk jumped from the exact price I expected it to $1739 at this moment.
The bell 🔔 still haven't rang ,we are still on weekend time for the US Market , let's see if that changes the price in either way 🤷♀️.
#SP500TopsRecord7800
#SP500EarningsBeatExpectations
#SECReviewsSix3xLeveragedCommodityETFs
Turns out I was right, SunDisk jumped from the exact price I expected it to $1739 at this moment.
The bell 🔔 still haven't rang ,we are still on weekend time for the US Market , let's see if that changes the price in either way 🤷♀️.
#SP500TopsRecord7800
#SP500EarningsBeatExpectations
#SECReviewsSix3xLeveragedCommodityETFs
Azraciv23
·
--
#TradebStocks #BinanceAfrica Today I traded some $SNDKB and it was not random decision. So, how did I choose this bStock ? First I had my eye on SunDisk for some time now and I genuenly believe its price will go up. It started with a price of $1700 on Binance and went up to $2376 at one point. Last month it slided below $1650 (its curent price) and stayed there untill today. So a possible brakout migh be coming. Also, stocks from the same sector had a similar move -like $MU and $SKHYNIX -and that might be a strong sector signal, not just a single stock moving. This is my opinion, and it might be completly wrong 😅 so please dont take this as signal. Always DYOR -and I mean that for real. In trading you must learn to listen to your own judgment first,because it is ultimatly your crypto and your responsibility what you do with it. 💛🖤
So few days ago the chart looked like this ,
and I thoughts it's a shorting signal
but I guess I was early cause it longed instead
What's interesting is that the pattern repeats once again in similar order .
I don't know how to draw on charts properly , but I do know a pattern when I see it 😉
$PORTAL
and I thoughts it's a shorting signal
but I guess I was early cause it longed instead
What's interesting is that the pattern repeats once again in similar order .
I don't know how to draw on charts properly , but I do know a pattern when I see it 😉
$PORTAL
Azraciv23
·
--
$PORTAL
👀 Have you seen how does this chart looks 😅
It's like someone drew it , text book presentation💥
Wait for the levels to fall back for
entering short,
It broke support 4 times already so I guess it will
start shorting at $0.0154
NFA , DYOR!
👀 Have you seen how does this chart looks 😅
It's like someone drew it , text book presentation💥
Wait for the levels to fall back for
entering short,
It broke support 4 times already so I guess it will
start shorting at $0.0154
NFA , DYOR!
$PORTAL
👀 Have you seen how does this chart looks 😅
It's like someone drew it , text book presentation💥
Wait for the levels to fall back for
entering short,
It broke support 4 times already so I guess it will
start shorting at $0.0154
NFA , DYOR!
👀 Have you seen how does this chart looks 😅
It's like someone drew it , text book presentation💥
Wait for the levels to fall back for
entering short,
It broke support 4 times already so I guess it will
start shorting at $0.0154
NFA , DYOR!
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk At first i thought bringing a regulated asset on chain was mostly about putting the asset there but then i looked at how @Dusk connects investor onboarding, wallet binding and transfer er controls and it started making more sense to me .
imagine a regulated bond that can only be held by approved investors . having a Dusk wallet does not automatically mean you are allowed to receive that bond . the investor has to be onboarded and the wallet has to be connected to that eligibility before the asset can move
I actually find this more interesting than just tokenizing a bond because the rules about who can own it become part of the assets lifecycle instead of being handled somewhere completely outside the blockchain .
now i am more curious about how this works once the same asset starts moving between lots of diferent investors and every wallet has to meet the right requirements on @Dusk .
would you rather have those eligibility checks happen before the transfer or find out afterwards that the buyer was not allowed to receive the asset?
$SNDK $COW #SP500TopsRecord7800 #COWRises55.77%In24h
imagine a regulated bond that can only be held by approved investors . having a Dusk wallet does not automatically mean you are allowed to receive that bond . the investor has to be onboarded and the wallet has to be connected to that eligibility before the asset can move
I actually find this more interesting than just tokenizing a bond because the rules about who can own it become part of the assets lifecycle instead of being handled somewhere completely outside the blockchain .
now i am more curious about how this works once the same asset starts moving between lots of diferent investors and every wallet has to meet the right requirements on @Dusk .
would you rather have those eligibility checks happen before the transfer or find out afterwards that the buyer was not allowed to receive the asset?
$SNDK $COW #SP500TopsRecord7800 #COWRises55.77%In24h
I keep seeing tokens from past CreatorPad events on the Top Gainers list At this moment we have :
$HEMI
$DOLO
$VANRY
Only HEMI and DOLO are actualy moving up at the moment , while VANRY is giving it's last kicks before delisting on 17th.
Sad for VANRY since it was one of the projects that I had great CreatorPad standing on, did a lots reaserch on it and honesly loved it. But I guess something changed in the meantime and the price of the coin went down fast ...
If I remember correctly their whole thing was AI memory and how to make AI remember contexts ,not just pieces of conversations, but now that problem is already in the past. Technology is so fast thise days that lot of this specific projects get obsolite fast...Unless they catch up with the times too 🤷♀️
$HEMI
$DOLO
$VANRY
Only HEMI and DOLO are actualy moving up at the moment , while VANRY is giving it's last kicks before delisting on 17th.
Sad for VANRY since it was one of the projects that I had great CreatorPad standing on, did a lots reaserch on it and honesly loved it. But I guess something changed in the meantime and the price of the coin went down fast ...
If I remember correctly their whole thing was AI memory and how to make AI remember contexts ,not just pieces of conversations, but now that problem is already in the past. Technology is so fast thise days that lot of this specific projects get obsolite fast...Unless they catch up with the times too 🤷♀️
$HEMI is still a top gainer but looks as it's slowing down for now, started going sideways . Tried opening long and chickened out fast, if I kept it open for 1 min more this would be a nice plus instead 😅.
You know the unwritten rule already - everytime you close the trade it goes crazy bullish , just inspite of you 😂
You know the unwritten rule already - everytime you close the trade it goes crazy bullish , just inspite of you 😂
#dusk $DUSK
I kept thinking tokenization and native issuance were basically the same thing until I actually read @Dusk s explanation.
Tokenization puts a token onchain that represents an asset held somewhere else
Native issuance is different because the asset itself is created and managed onchain, which could let RWAs have their issuance, transfers and settlement built around the same ledger
What caught my attention is that #dusk also says the reduced reliance on separate custody and registry layers depends on the legal structure...
I understand the technical difference, but now Im wondering about the point where the technical and legal sides actually meet. If an asset is created and managed onchain, what determines when it can legally be treated as the asset itself rather than a representation of something held elsewhere?
Also how is that line handled in practice?
@Dusk $MOVR $ONE
I kept thinking tokenization and native issuance were basically the same thing until I actually read @Dusk s explanation.
Tokenization puts a token onchain that represents an asset held somewhere else
Native issuance is different because the asset itself is created and managed onchain, which could let RWAs have their issuance, transfers and settlement built around the same ledger
What caught my attention is that #dusk also says the reduced reliance on separate custody and registry layers depends on the legal structure...
I understand the technical difference, but now Im wondering about the point where the technical and legal sides actually meet. If an asset is created and managed onchain, what determines when it can legally be treated as the asset itself rather than a representation of something held elsewhere?
Also how is that line handled in practice?
@Dusk $MOVR $ONE
Join! Another fun campaign with @Binance Africa !
Binance Africa
·
--
🚀 Flash Quest: Stocks Are Moving Fast on Binance! The markets are on the move. 📈
Trade your favourite stocks on Binance, then share your trade on Binance Square for a chance to win rewards from our $ 1,000 USDC Prize pool
How to Participate:
🔸 Follow @Binance Africa
🔸 Like this post and repost
🔸 Share your bStocks trades on Square using the tradingcard with hashtag #TradebStocks #BinanceAfrica
🔸 Fill in this survey 👉🏾 Click on the Link to Participate Prizes: A total of 200 winners will receive 5 USDC each.
🔸 📆 Period: Aug 13, 2026 10:00 UTC – Aug 23, 2026 23:59 UTC
$TSLAB
Trade your favourite stocks on Binance, then share your trade on Binance Square for a chance to win rewards from our $ 1,000 USDC Prize pool
How to Participate:
🔸 Follow @Binance Africa
🔸 Like this post and repost
🔸 Share your bStocks trades on Square using the tradingcard with hashtag #TradebStocks #BinanceAfrica
🔸 Fill in this survey 👉🏾 Click on the Link to Participate Prizes: A total of 200 winners will receive 5 USDC each.
🔸 📆 Period: Aug 13, 2026 10:00 UTC – Aug 23, 2026 23:59 UTC
$TSLAB
$ACE is looking little confused about it's direction.
It pulls this giant green candles, just to go back down in exacly same lenght red candles.
I was playing with it on DEMO and what's interesting is that all tries to open long were failures .
The short trade on the other hand went excelent, but that is demo 😅
The funding fees are
👉 Short Play Longs ,
so keep an eye on that if you are trading ...
$ACE
It pulls this giant green candles, just to go back down in exacly same lenght red candles.
I was playing with it on DEMO and what's interesting is that all tries to open long were failures .
The short trade on the other hand went excelent, but that is demo 😅
The funding fees are
👉 Short Play Longs ,
so keep an eye on that if you are trading ...
$ACE
$ACE
Today The Fusionist has a clear and visible take off 🚀
The coin is going up like there is no tommorow.
Take a look at it !
$ACE
Today The Fusionist has a clear and visible take off 🚀
The coin is going up like there is no tommorow.
Take a look at it !
$ACE
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
I used to think that if a project has a tight cryptographic design, that automatically makes it safer Turns out, no matter how tight the math is built, the softest spot is almost always the same thing: the human factor.
When the @Dusk team spotted unusual activity back in January, tied to a wallet used for bridge operations, this turned out to be true again Not a flaw in the actual protocol. Not the ZK proofs or the shielded transfers breaking. Just an operational wallet with too much responsibility sitting on it
They paused the bridge right away Once part of the flow touched Binance, the two teams coordinated directly to contain it, and no user funds were affected
What I actually cared about was what came after...
Because the easy move here is patching the one thing that got hit and calling it fixed. @Dusk didnt do that They rebuilt the whole bridge design.
Separated the components, separated signing from event handling, made the transaction flow explicit step by step, and cut down how much exposure any single hot wallet carries. The web wallet also picked up a blocklist that flags known bad addresses before you send to them.
Thats the part that actually matters to me.Cryptography can be flawless and the operational layer around it can still be the weak link. Thats how these systems work
Problems are going to happen in crypto. Thats why we stress test projects, run testnets before mainnet, and use hackathons where people actively try to break things. Thats how builders find the weak sides and learn from them.
So the question isnt whether a problem will ever happen. Its what happens when it does. Do you put a temporary band aid over it 🩹, or do you perform the whole surgical operation🧑⚕️ and fix the underlying design?
@Dusk chose the design problem. #dusk $SPCX $METAB #DUSKARMY.
I used to think that if a project has a tight cryptographic design, that automatically makes it safer Turns out, no matter how tight the math is built, the softest spot is almost always the same thing: the human factor.
When the @Dusk team spotted unusual activity back in January, tied to a wallet used for bridge operations, this turned out to be true again Not a flaw in the actual protocol. Not the ZK proofs or the shielded transfers breaking. Just an operational wallet with too much responsibility sitting on it
They paused the bridge right away Once part of the flow touched Binance, the two teams coordinated directly to contain it, and no user funds were affected
What I actually cared about was what came after...
Because the easy move here is patching the one thing that got hit and calling it fixed. @Dusk didnt do that They rebuilt the whole bridge design.
Separated the components, separated signing from event handling, made the transaction flow explicit step by step, and cut down how much exposure any single hot wallet carries. The web wallet also picked up a blocklist that flags known bad addresses before you send to them.
Thats the part that actually matters to me.Cryptography can be flawless and the operational layer around it can still be the weak link. Thats how these systems work
Problems are going to happen in crypto. Thats why we stress test projects, run testnets before mainnet, and use hackathons where people actively try to break things. Thats how builders find the weak sides and learn from them.
So the question isnt whether a problem will ever happen. Its what happens when it does. Do you put a temporary band aid over it 🩹, or do you perform the whole surgical operation🧑⚕️ and fix the underlying design?
@Dusk chose the design problem. #dusk $SPCX $METAB #DUSKARMY.
$QQQ
Decided to add $10 on its price overnight ...
While you were sleeping someone else was trading
And we can see that clearly in the numbers.
A jump from $720 ish to $735 is not small.
Eyes on the prize ! 🏆 👀
Decided to add $10 on its price overnight ...
While you were sleeping someone else was trading
And we can see that clearly in the numbers.
A jump from $720 ish to $735 is not small.
Eyes on the prize ! 🏆 👀
Connectez-vous pour découvrir plus de contenu