Join the group to trade the positions we are currently running with us.
All signals are shared in the group first before being posted anywhere else. Some exclusive trades are only available in the group, including certain Alpha coins that won’t be posted elsewhere.
Join the group, connect with me there, and feel free to message me directly.
The DuskEVM bridge has a detail that is easy to miss: moving $DUSK back to Dusk L1 is not treated like a simple withdrawal. A deposit can move from Dusk L1 into the EVM environment, but the reverse direction requires a proof and finalization process. The docs even warn that users should follow the withdrawal status shown in the Web Wallet rather than assuming the funds will be ready after a fixed amount of time.
DuskEVM is not replacing DuskDS underneath it. The EVM layer handles execution, while DuskDS remains responsible for settlement and data availability. So the bridge is really connecting two different execution environments while keeping the L1 as the settlement foundation. A user sees a bridge button, but underneath there are proof maturity and dispute-game checks before the withdrawal can be finalized. That is a very different experience from the instant “send and forget” feeling people are used to with simple token transfers.
I’d like to see the Dusk team eventually make that process more transparent inside the wallet, especially explaining what stage the proof is at and what exactly is still preventing finalization. The mechanism can stay technical, but the user shouldn’t have to read bridge documentation to understand why their withdrawal is waiting. With DuskEVM opening the Solidity route while DuskDS remains the settlement layer, I think these small pieces of infrastructure will say a lot about how practical the whole architecture becomes. @Dusk #dusk
"So, based on this theory, the next 6 month candle should be green, meaning the move down we're seeing right now could actually be the capitulation candle."
"Because we topped earlier in this bull cycle (October), Q4 sellers were front run."
"If that's the case, it's reasonable to assume Q4 buyers will get front run as well."
$BTC put in a local bottom. The bottom will be in hindsight just as The top was in hindsight.
Let's make a bullish case: RSI just hit a reading of 82 on the daily chart. This is ultra bullish, not typical of a fake out right before a big drop.
Recent big price drops we've seen RSI reach as high as 65-70 levels prior to dropping, similar to big drops in 2022.
Coming out of the 2022 bottom: Bullish divergence -> RSI reached 88 January 14th -> Price pumped 50% from buy signal to top wick -> Took 30 days for trending dots to catch-up -> Price retraced -33% and then pumped again
Cautions remain as posted earlier.
Make a macro higher high above $82,000 and in hindsight that will have been The bottom. Below it and it's another lower high.
Corporate actions sounded like one of those finance terms that only matters to people working behind the market. Then I noticed Dusk treats them as part of what happens to a tokenized asset after it has already been issued and traded. Dividends still need to reach investors, votes still need to be handled, records have to stay accurate and lifecycle events have to reach the right holders. Dusk infrastructure is designed to support these kinds of servicing workflows alongside the asset itself. Putting a bond or fund onchain solves only one part of the process. If every dividend, corporate action or ownership update still has to pass through disconnected systems, the underlying workflow hasn’t changed as much as the token makes it look. A public blockchain can expose far more information than a regulated investor should have to reveal. Dusk’s approach combines restricted financial information with selective disclosure, so the relevant parties can verify what they are authorized to see without turning the whole investor record into public data. I’d like to see the Dusk team push this further at the application level. If an investor receives a dividend or participates in a corporate action through Dusk, the process should eventually feel almost invisible compared with today’s financial platforms, even though there is considerably more happening underneath. Maybe that is a better benchmark for tokenization: not whether the asset appears onchain, but whether the complicated lifecycle around owning it becomes easier to manage. @Dusk $DUSK #dusk