Starknet may be facing its biggest strategic decision yet.
Moving from Ethereum L2 to an independent L1 could give it more control over its quantum-resistant roadmap — but it also means weighing what it could lose by stepping away from Ethereum.
The key question isn't just whether the technology works.
Can it turn quantum resistance into real adoption and value for $STRK ?
Still under consideration. Not a confirmed migration.
Would you stay on Ethereum L2 or pursue L1 independence? 👀
TMF caught my attention for a different reason. I’m less interested in the 4,001 NFTs. I’m more interested in what happens when those NFTs become active Seats. Because once a Seat is activated, it isn’t just sitting in your wallet anymore. You’re basically getting a position in a system where capital allocation is influenced by the Seat holders. That changes the value proposition quite a bit. The NFT itself might have a market price. But the real question is whether the rights attached to that NFT can create value over time. And that’s the part I’ll be watching. If the community actually uses the voting mechanism and the funds can generate meaningful returns, the Seat could become much more than a collectible. If not, then 4,001 Seats are still just 4,001 NFTs. The experiment is more interesting to me than the mint. @TheMutualFun #TMF #NFT #Seat