CryptoLinus

$BTC Remember market follows liquidity,

And looking at the current scenario, we have a ton of liquidity stacked below 62.5k,

Seeing all the news events happening starting from today,

I think it's very likely we might see distribution from here and finally hunt the levels below,

As we have been engineering liquidity sub 62k from the past 1.5 months.

The $BTC CVD indicator shows buying by whales.

Retail investors sold during the short-term decline. However, buying by whales continues to maintain an increase trend.

There are still no large-scale sell or buy walls. Furthermore, large-scale selling by whales has not been confirmed.

The positive trend is continuing.

The Dusk node requirements surprised me a little because they are much lighter than I expected for a network targeting regulated financial infrastructure.
A provisioner can run with 2 CPU cores, 4 GB RAM, 50 GB storage and a 10 Mbps connection. The minimum stake is 1,000 DUSK, and the node needs to stay online and synchronized to participate in consensus.
I actually like this detail because people usually talk about Dusk through privacy, RWAs and compliance, but none of that matters much if running the underlying network requires some massive infrastructure setup.
There is also a separate prover role, which makes sense when the network is dealing with zero knowledge workloads instead of putting every kind of computation onto the same machine.
So the architecture feels a little more practical to me now. A relatively modest provisioner handles consensus participation, while heavier proving work can be separated when needed.
That is a very different thing from simply saying Dusk is built for financial markets.
I’m more curious about how this separation performs once confidential financial applications start generating real proving demand.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

A Binance P2P Order Came With One Extra Instruction
A USDT sell order was already active when the buyer added one more request in the chat: use a different payment note than the one normally associated with the transaction.
The amount was unchanged. The bank account was unchanged. Only the payment reference was different.
That small change matters because a clean P2P transaction should be easy to connect from the buyer, the order, the payment and the chat. Adding an unrelated reference makes that trail harder to understand if the transaction later needs to be reviewed.
The safer move is simple: follow the payment details shown in the active Binance P2P order. Keep the transaction inside the platform, check the counterparty information, and retain the Order ID and payment record.
So I told the buyer to follow the original order instructions. The trade stayed inside Binance P2P, where the escrow, order chat and Appeal process could still be used if anything went wrong.
A small payment-reference change might look harmless, but I would never trade a clean transaction trail for convenience.
Before paying or accepting payment, I now check the order details, payment instructions, counterparty identity and transaction record against each other. If someone suddenly wants a different arrangement, I stop and clarify it through the order.
@Binance Vietnam #BinanceP2PAnToan

Bitcoin pushed into the $65K resistance zone before seeing an immediate rejection.

Price wicked into $65,000 before pulling back to around $64,300.

The important part:

Bulls are still defending the $64K area.

$64K has now flipped into the key short-term support level.

As long as BTC holds above this zone, the rejection looks more like consolidation rather than a breakdown.

The levels I’m watching:

Above $65K:

$65.7K
$67.2K

Below $64K:

$63K
$61K

Bitcoin is currently stuck between a key pivot and major resistance.

A clean reclaim of $65.7K would shift momentum back in favour of the bulls.

Until then, patience.

Confirmation over prediction.

$BTC At the moment, it looks like we're seeing a rejection off the strong OB, which we predicted yesterday...

Still a bit early to fully understand the price movement, but if we see a continuation lower, the next region I'm expecting to test is the imbalance formed around $63.7k.

I'll assess price action based on whether we accept or reject this region.

I'm currently in a short from $64.8k with an expectation of reclaiming $63.3k.

$BTC Swing Long

Holding this position for the next 2–3 years.

Take profit will be hit. The games have begun.

At first i thought native issuance was basically just another version of tokenization but the more i read about how Dusk separates the two, the more i started to see why they keep making that distinction. Tokenization can put an existing asset onchain, while native issuance can change where the asset lifecycle actually starts and how ownership, transfers and settlement are handled from there.

That also made the regulated securities angle make more sense to me. If the asset is designed around an onchain lifecycle instead of being created somewhere else and represented onchain later, then the blockchain is not just acting like a new place to store the same asset.
I think that is where the idea gets more interesting. Creating a token is probably the easy part. Making issuance, ownership, transfer and settlement work together while the asset still has to fit real regulatory requirements is the much harder problem.

The part i keep coming back to is that $DUSK is trying to handle more than the token itself. If the entire lifecycle can eventually happen around the same infrastructure, then tokenization becomes only one small part of the story.
Would native issuance eventually matter more than simply putting existing assets onchain?

@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

CZ officially stops using his public wallet, saying it’s “almost impossible to clean out” as unsolicited meme coins continue piling in.

Multiple traders had been monitoring CZ’s wallet for trading signals, with one reportedly making $282K, a 29x return, after spotting the wallet burn $MarsCoin and immediately buying in while paying 100x the usual gas fees.

The founder of Binance says he will donate the remaining tokens to Giggle Academy before abandoning the address, as attempts to burn unsolicited tokens only resulted in more token spam and further speculation around his on-chain activity.

$BTC EQHs are finally swept and now price is chopping around it,

I am expecting price to pump to 64.8k-65k and that's where I will look for short setups.

Expecting price to start dumping from the other half of the week (Thursday).

On HTF, I am still targeting the 60-61k before the bull run starts.

I once had a P2P order where the countdown became more stressful than the trade itself.
I was buying USDT and noticed the payment window was getting shorter. My bank was taking longer than usual, and I started thinking about the timer instead of the transaction.
That was when I nearly made a stupid decision.
I was about to transfer first and deal with the details afterward simply because I didn't want the order to expire.
I stopped and looked at the order again. The payment window is there to define how long I have to complete the payment, not to force me into sending money blindly. Binance also tells users to review the advertiser's terms before placing the order.
⏳ I would rather lose one P2P offer than rush a payment just because the countdown is running.
🏦 If my bank is delayed or unavailable, I wait until I can complete the payment properly instead of improvising with another account or another method.
📍 I only follow the payment method and conditions shown in that specific advertisement.
🧾 If the order expires before I can complete everything correctly, I move on rather than trying to recreate the transaction through a different route.
The annoying part is that the pressure came entirely from my own head.
That made me realize how easily a countdown can turn a normal P2P transaction into an emotional decision.
A rushed bank transfer can create a problem that doesn't disappear when the timer does.
@Binance Vietnam #BinanceP2PAnToan

$BTC The bottom might be in.

So far, price is still holding above the S/R level from the previous top and the aVWAP from the last bottom.

We’re also seeing compression and a decline in volatility, which is very typical at the end of a bear market.

I don’t think it makes sense to wait for lower prices here.

It’s time to long.

$BTC August 14–16.

Price pushed lower into the same time pivot as the 2018 bear market.

Price has been following these time pivots closely. If the correlation continues, price could push higher into early September.

I'm remaining cautious, as price front-ran the 60–62K level I was targeting, which is a major liquidity cluster.

$SOL Breaking Bullish

Nice break above descending trendline.

Multiple confirming factors indicate upside is more likely.

If $BTC holds 64k, SOL should run towards its liquidation range between 77 - 79.

$BTC We’re currently seeing a strong bounce from an important support level.

During this pump, open interest has started to cool off significantly, while spot participation has started to pick up again.

At the same time, we’ve seen quite a decent amount of shorts getting squeezed out of the market.

This suggests that the move has been supported by genuine spot demand while excessive leverage is being flushed out at the same time.

Price is now approaching an important resistance level, so it will be interesting to see whether buyers are strong enough to push BTC above it.

If spot demand remains strong and buyers manage to reclaim this level, I think there is a good chance that we see a continuation towards $67k.

I was lat how Dusk handles smart contracts and one thing caught me off guard, the network is not trying to make every developer follow the same execution model. There is native WASM execution through Piecrust, while @Dusk also gives Solidity developers another route through DuskEVM.
A financial application does not always have the same requirements as a normal DeFi app. Some developers may want the control of the native environment, while others already have years of Solidity code and tooling they would rather not throw away. Dusk seems to be leaving both doors open instead of forcing everything through one stack.
The part I find harder to judge is whether that flexibility actually helps adoption or just creates another decision developers have to make before building. More options are useful, but only if developers clearly understand when each environment makes sense.
That probably matters more than simply having an EVM layer. A chain can make development familiar and still struggle to attract applications that people actually use.
Would you rather build directly with Piecrust, or take the easier route through Solidity and DuskEVM?
$DUSK #dusk @Dusk

I was buying USDT on Binance P2P and made a stupid mistake I almost turned into a much bigger headache.

My bank app froze right after I confirmed the transfer. I thought the payment had failed, so I pressed the button again. A few seconds later, both transfers appeared in my bank history.

Now I had paid twice, while the seller only had one Binance P2P order to match against those payments. I immediately realized that sending the second payment created a problem that escrow could not magically solve for me.

🧩 I kept everything inside the original order instead of asking the seller to handle the extra money somewhere else.

📌 I saved both bank receipts, the Order ID and the chat because the second transfer was not part of the original order amount.

🚧 I also refused any quick “just send it back to another account” solution. If money needs to be returned, I want the transaction and refund trail to remain clear.

The painful part was realizing that a mistake can happen before any scam is involved. One extra transfer can create a separate payment dispute, waste time and require evidence to explain exactly what happened.

That changed one habit for me: when a banking app looks delayed, I check the transaction history before pressing Send again.
One order. One payment. Check first, send once.

@Binance Vietnam #BinanceP2PAnToan

$BTC My pattern plays out again...

Friday weakness.✔️
Weekend strength.✔️

This time wasn't different.
The weekend should close above Friday's candle close, bringing the pattern to 14 out of the last 15 instances.

$LINK Has been outperforming and has broken above the $8.9 horizontal.

Looks quite good and yet another coin that shows strength after the Standard Chartered report. Whether that's the cause or not, these may become a self fulfilling prophecy at this point, as more people catch on.

Anyways, from here on out the LINK bulls need to hold the $8.9 level going forward to keep the move going.

The Smallest P2P Mistake Can Become The Expensive One

A friend once rushed into a P2P order because the offer looked convenient. Nothing dramatic happened at first. The problem was a small misunderstanding during the payment process, and by the time both sides realized they were working from different assumptions, the order had already become a dispute.

The money was not necessarily gone, but the time was. Payment proof had to be collected, the order details checked again, and the situation explained through the official process. Binance says its Appeal process can review both sides of a disputed transaction, which is useful, but it is still much easier to prevent confusion than reconstruct everything afterward.

Read the offer and understand exactly what the counterparty expects before paying.
If something feels unclear, don't increase the amount just because the price looks attractive.
Keep the payment proof and Order ID until the transaction is fully settled.
If a problem appears, don't create another transaction to “fix” the first one. Keep the original evidence and use Appeal when necessary.

Binance P2P already provides escrow, KYC, order records and support, but those tools work much better when the original transaction is clear and properly documented.
It is the small decision that turns a five minute trade into days of explaining what happened.

@Binance Vietnam #BinanceP2PAnToan