🚹 $3.8 MILLION WITHDRAWN. BUT THE DEPOSITS NEVER HAPPENED?

$NEAR Intents just revealed how an attacker created millions of dollars in balances that weren't backed by real deposits.

And the most disturbing detail?

It happened 23 TIMES.

🔍 HERE'S WHAT THE INVESTIGATION FOUND

On October 16, NEAR Intents published a detailed postmortem of its October 1 exploit.

The attacker exploited a smart contract accounting flaw.

Here's the trick:

1ïžâƒŁ A deposit was initiated.
2ïžâƒŁ A failed contract notification caused the tokens to be refunded.
3ïžâƒŁ NEAR Intents still recorded the deposit as successful.
4ïžâƒŁ The attacker used that artificial balance to withdraw real assets.

After 23 failed deposits, the system had credited approximately $3.8 million in funds that weren't actually there.

The team calls them "ghost funds."

⚠ IMPORTANT DETAILS

‱ The flaw was in the $NEAR Intents contract, not the Omni infrastructure.
‱ The team says all $3.8M was returned.
‱ Affected users were fully compensated.
‱ The vulnerable feature was removed.
‱ New balance checks and automatic safeguards were introduced.

💭 MY TAKE

The scary part isn't just the $3.8 million.

It's that a system can appear properly funded while its internal accounting tells a completely different story.

This raises a bigger question for DeFi: how many vulnerabilities remain invisible until someone exploits them?

The funds are back. But rebuilding trust is a different challenge.

👀 YOUR TAKE:

Would you trust $NEAR Intents again after these fixes?

Or does an exploit like this permanently change your view of a protocol?

👇 I want to hear both sides.

#Near #defi #CryptoSecurity