Been watching @TermMax since April and the V2 roadmap convinced me this isn't another lending fork.

They hit $34.9M TVL in five months with 10,000+ users, but the team openly admits three problems: liquidity fragmented across markets, capital frozen until maturity, idle funds earning nothing.

Their fix is clever.

Atomic Orders let one vault show the same 1.1M USDC across every market at once

it can only be taken once, then disappears everywhere atomically.

Smart Unwind lets borrowers set take-profit APRs, turning debt into trade able liquidity, so 5 ETH borrowed can recycle multiple times instead of sitting locked for 30 days.

That recycling part matters most to me turnover is where lending protocols actually make money.

They're projecting 5x-20x more liquidity per market and 1.5x-5x capital turnover. Big claims, but the mechanism is real.

My governance concern: who sets these parameters as curators multiply, and will TMX holders genuinely control that, or will the team keep the keys?

Curious how others weigh mechanism design against governance centralization when sizing into young protocols? #TermMax