us

Regional powers including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Egypt and Oman are trying to bring Iran and the United States to talks in Istanbul on Friday, officials say, to stave off war – starting with Tehran’s nuclear file despite a wide gap over US demands on missiles and allied militias.
What is new this week is not simply another round of nuclear diplomacy, but the intensity of the regional effort behind it.
Officials say the priority of the Istanbul meeting is to prevent conflict, with countries including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Egypt, Oman, Pakistan and the UAE invited at foreign-minister level as part of a broader attempt to start dialogue before tensions spiral.
The meeting is expected to bring US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi together, with regional mediators hoping the presence of Arab and Turkish ministers can help bridge gaps that have widened since talks collapsed last summer after Israeli and US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
One regional official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that US President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner will also attend alongside Witkoff if the meeting goes ahead.
According to Qatar's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Majed Al-Ansari, on Tuesday, there is regional collaboration and ongoing efforts aimed at ensuring the de-escalation.
The UAE president's adviser Anwar Gargash told a panel at the World Governments Summit in Dubai on Tuesday, "I think that the region has gone through various calamitous confrontations. I don't think we need another one, but I would like to see direct Iranian-American negotiations leading to understandings so that we don't have these issues every other day."
Public rhetoric on both sides remains extreme, making it harder to judge where compromise lies.
Trump warned this week that with big US warships heading to Iran, "bad things" would likely happen without an agreement, while Iran’s leadership continues to insist it will not negotiate under threats.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Tuesday that he had instructed foreign minister to prepare the ground for talks with the United States.
“Given requests from friendly governments in the region for a response to the US president’s proposal for talks, I instructed the foreign minister to, if conditions are suitable – free of threats and unrealistic expectations – create the groundwork for fair and equitable negotiations, guided by the principle of dignity, wisdom, and expediency, within the framework of the national interest,” Pezeshkian said.
The existence of an Istanbul channel – and the involvement of multiple regional capitals – suggests both sides are still testing whether a deal is possible.
Where talks could bog down
The central diplomatic battle is over scope. Regional officials involved in the effort say mediators are trying to limit the talks to Iran’s nuclear program as the most realistic path to getting Tehran to “yes,” with one official describing the strategy as addressing Washington’s non-nuclear demands only later through innovative ways.
“If the talks happen, they will stay focused on Iran’s nuclear program. And then we will try to find innovative ways to address Washington’s nonnuclear demands,” the Washington Post cited a US official as saying.
The Trump administration, however, has been explicit that it wants more than nuclear limits – including constraints on Iran’s missile development and its support for allied militia groups across Iraq, Lebanon, Yemen and elsewhere.
That mismatch is likely to define the talks: Iran wants the file narrow, Washington wants it comprehensive.
Uranium stockpile and enrichment: the urgent nuclear core
At the heart of the talks is Iran’s uranium stockpile and enrichment capability.
The Trump administration has demanded that Tehran remove or transfer 400 kilograms (more than 900 pounds) of uranium enriched to 60% purity and curb enrichment activity it says is edging toward weapons capability.
Iran denies it intends to weaponize its program, but the question of what happens to existing stockpiles – whether moved abroad, frozen, or placed under tighter monitoring – remains one of the most immediate pressure points.
Analysts say one possible compromise could be suspending further enrichment without Iran explicitly renouncing what it claims as a right to enrich under the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Missile program: Tehran’s red line
Iran has consistently signaled that its missile program is not up for negotiation.
That creates an early ceiling on what can be achieved if Washington insists on missile curbs as part of any package, reinforcing the mediator strategy of keeping the first phase focused tightly on the nuclear file.
Regional militias: the hardest unresolved layer
The US has also demanded that Iran reduce support for allied non-state groups across the region.
Iran is unlikely to publicly abandon those relationships, but experts suggest the sides could explore narrower understandings – such as a nonaggression framework that extends to both countries’ respective partners – rather than an explicit proxy rollback.
This is where the talks could either expand into a broader security negotiation or fracture under maximalist expectations.
What happens next
Officials caution that details of the Istanbul format remain unclear, but the “main meeting” is expected on Friday.
The immediate goal may be modest: establish a channel, prevent escalation, and see whether nuclear-focused diplomacy can restart – with missiles and regional militias left as the more difficult second-stage questions.
In that sense, Istanbul seems less about a final agreement than about whether the sides can still find a negotiating floor before confrontation becomes the default.
According to an Iranian diplomatic source cited by Reuters on Tuesday, Iran is "neither optimistic nor pessimistic" over the talks.
#iran #US #USIranStandoff

en the United States and Iran have increased sharply in recent days, raising global concerns about security in the Middle East. The standoff has been fueled by military incidents in the Gulfs and ongoing disagreements over Iran’s nuclear program and US sanctions.
Recently, the US military reported intercepting an Iranian drone near its naval assets, while Iran accused the US of provoking instability in the region. Both sides have increased their military presence, especially around the Strait of Hormuz, a critical route for global oil supplies. Any disruption there could seriously impact oil prices and the global economy.
Despite the rising tensions, diplomatic efforts are still underway. Regional countries and global powers are urging both nations to avoid escalation and resolve disputes through dialogue. Iran and the US have also sent indirect signals that talks remain an option to prevent a full-scale conflict.
$BTC #TrumpEndsShutdown #USIranStandoff #KevinWarshNominationBullOrBear #US #Binance

"Usalranstandoff" appears to be a typo or merged spelling of US-Iran standoff (or "USA-Iran standoff"), referring to the current high-tension situation between the United States and Iran as of early February 2026.
This ongoing geopolitical crisis involves military posturing, threats of strikes, naval incidents, and simultaneous diplomatic efforts under President Donald Trump's administration. Key developments include:
- The US has deployed significant military assets, including the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group in the region, described by Trump as an "armada" to pressure Iran into negotiations.
- Recent incidents: US forces shot down an Iranian drone approaching the carrier in the Arabian Sea (claimed as self-defense), and there were reports of Iranian boats harassing a US-flagged vessel in the Strait of Hormuz.
- Trump has pushed for talks on Iran's nuclear program, warning of severe consequences (potentially "far worse" than prior actions) if no deal is reached, while also commenting on internal Iranian protests and calling for regime change in some contexts.
- Iran has responded with warnings of powerful retaliation (including threats toward Israel if attacked), but signals openness to "fair and equitable" negotiations without coercion.
- Regional dynamics: Gulf states (led by Saudi Arabia) have reportedly warned they won't allow their territory/airspace for US attacks on Iran, limiting US options and creating a strategic "checkmate" feel for some analysts. This complicates any potential strike plans.
- Broader context: Tensions tie into recent anti-regime protests in Iran, past US/Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites (e.g., in 2025), and fears of escalation into wider conflict affecting global oil routes.
Both sides express interest in diplomacy (talks reportedly ongoing or scheduled), but incidents at sea and military buildups keep the risk of miscalculation high. Analysts describe it as a delicate balance between brinkmanship and de-escalation, with no full-scale war preferred but no easy off-ramp either.
#USIranStandoff #US #iran #etf #Binance