ethereum

$BTC $XRP $ETH A major Ethereum whale has started de-risking, selling a portion of its ETH holdings and moving funds to exchanges amid ongoing market volatility. On-chain data shows the wallet previously accumulated a large ETH position, but as unrealized gains turned into losses, the whale reduced exposure to manage downside risk.
When large holders trim positions, it often signals caution and can impact short-term market sentiment. These moves highlight how big investors actively adjust their strategies as market conditions change.
#TrendingTopic #ethereum #ETH #whaleActivity #Onchai

From a broader market-structure perspective, the ongoing consolidation appears less like accumulation and more like a pause before a continuation. Unless buyers can decisively reclaim control, the risk of a deeper corrective move below $1,000 remains firmly in play.

Ethereum ( $ETH ) price key technical points

Ethereum is trading at the point of control, a critical balance level

Low-volume bounces signal weak demand, raising bull trap risk

Untapped liquidity sits below range lows, increasing downside probability

Ethereum’s recent bounce from the point of control has been shallow and short-lived. On the lower timeframes, price has shown temporary stabilization, but these moves have not been supported by strong bullish volume. In trending markets, sustainable reversals typically require expanding participation and aggressive buying, neither of which is currently present.

This type of weak rebound often signals a potential bull trap, in which the price briefly moves higher before rolling over and resuming the dominant trend. As long as Ethereum fails to reclaim higher resistance levels with conviction, short-term rallies remain vulnerable to rejection.

Liquidity below price remains unresolved

One of the most important factors influencing Ethereum’s downside risk is the presence of untouched liquidity beneath current price levels. Clean lows remain intact below the market, suggesting that stop-loss orders and resting sell-side liquidity are concentrated beneath support.

Markets naturally gravitate toward areas of liquidity, particularly during corrective or range-bound conditions. Until this liquidity is addressed, Ethereum remains susceptible to a rotation lower, designed to flush out weak positioning and rebalance the market structure.

Loss of point of control signals expansion risk

The point of control represents the price level at which the most trading activity occurs and often acts as a stabilizing force during consolidation phases. However, once the price loses the POC on a closing basis, it typically signals a shift from balance to imbalance.

If Ethereum decisively loses this level, the probability of an accelerated move increases. In this context, that would likely mean a capitulation-style rotation lower as price seeks the next major area of acceptance. Historically, such moves tend to be swift and volatile, particularly when liquidity below price remains untested.

$900 range low comes into focus

From a high-timeframe perspective, the next major downside target sits near the $900 level. This zone aligns with the value area low and the lower boundary of Ethereum’s broader trading range. Previous interactions with this region have resulted in strong reactions, making it a critical area for potential stabilization or reversal.

A move toward $900 would likely coincide with heightened volatility and emotional selling, characteristics often associated with capitulation events. While such a move may appear bearish in the short term, it could ultimately serve as a necessary reset before a more sustainable base can form.

What to expect in the coming price action

From a technical, price-action, and market-structure perspective, Ethereum remains at risk of trading below $1,000 if current support fails.

The combination of weak bounce attempts, unresolved liquidity, and the potential loss of the point of control favors downside continuation toward the $900 range low.

For this outlook to improve, Ethereum would need to regain control with strong volume confirmation and demonstrate acceptance above higher value areas.
#Ethereum

In 2026, comparing blockchains is no longer about who has the highest TPS or who is faster.
The real question is
What problem is this chain trying to solve?
$NEAR and $SUI are perfect examples of this.
They are both fast. Both powerful. Both growing.
But they are not trying to win the same game.
NEAR is Trying to Hide the Blockchain From You
NEAR has quietly moved away from being “just another Layer 1.”
Its big idea now is called Chain Abstraction.
Instead of trying to make people come use NEAR directly, NEAR wants to become the invisible layer that connects everything in Web3.
The goal is simple, you use crypto without feeling like you are using crypto.
How NEAR scales
NEAR uses something called Nightshade sharding.
Think of it like a highway. Most chains have one big road where all transactions pass through. NEAR keeps adding more lanes.
As of early 2026, NEAR runs on more than nine shards. That means it can handle a huge amount of activity simply by adding more capacity when needed.
This isn’t a future promise. It’s already running like this.
Where NEAR really stands out : User experience
This is where NEAR feels different from most chains.
You get named accounts like user.near instead of long wallet addresses.You can use your NEAR account to sign transactions on #Ethereum or #Bitcoin.
You might be interacting with Ethereum or Bitcoin and not even realize it.
NEAR is trying to remove the “technical stress” from using blockchain.
NEAR’s big 2026 direction : User-Owned AI
NEAR is now positioning itself as the place where AI agents can live on-chain.
The idea is that AI won’t just be software you use.
AI can hold assets, sign transactions and perform tasks on your behalf directly on the blockchain.
That’s a very different vision from most other Layer 1s.
NEAR is preparing for a world where users and AI interact with crypto without worrying about networks, wallets or gas fees.
Sui is Focused on Pure Speed and Performance
While NEAR focuses on abstraction and smooth experience, Sui is focused on something else
Raw performance and safety.
Sui doesn’t use shards like NEAR. Instead, it uses a completely different way of handling blockchain data.
How Sui works differently
Most blockchains think in terms of accounts holding balances.
Sui thinks in terms of objects.
Coins are objects.
NFTs are objects.
Smart contracts are objects.
Because these objects don’t depend on each other, Sui can process many transactions at the same time instead of one after another.
This is why Sui is extremely fast without needing sharding.
Where Sui shines : Speed that feels like Web2
$Sui regularly finalizes transactions in under half a second.
That’s so fast it doesn’t feel like a blockchain. It feels like using a normal app.
This is why Sui has become popular for:
GamingReal-time DeFiApps where instant response matters
Sui’s big strength : The Move language
Sui uses a programming language called Move.
Move was designed to prevent many of the common smart contract hacks we see on $ETH , like re-entrancy attacks and asset misuse.
This has turned into Sui’s biggest advantage.
It’s now seen as one of the safest high speed chains for serious applications and even institutional interest.
The Real Difference Between NEAR and Sui
NEAR is building a future where you don’t know which blockchain you are using. Everything just works smoothly in the background, even across Bitcoin and Ethereum. It is betting big on abstraction, user experience and a world where AI agents can operate on-chain for users.
Sui is building a future where applications need extreme speed and strong safety. It is focused on making blockchain feel as fast and responsive as Web2 while keeping assets secure through its object model and Move language.
They are not trying to beat each other.
They are solving different parts of the same problem.
In conclusion
If the future of Web3 is about seamless cross chain interaction, AI agents and removing the complexity of crypto for users, NEAR is positioned perfectly for that world.
If the future of Web3 is about gaming, real time apps, and high speed on-chain activity that feels like Web2, Sui is built for that world.
Both visions can succeed.
And that’s why this isn’t really a competition.
It’s two different roads leading to the same destination: making blockchain usable for everyone.

From my perspective, is not following the 2022 playbook. What we’re seeing now doesn’t look like a trend breakdown driven by extreme monetary tightening. Instead, it closely resembles the 2020 setup — a market positioning for a longer-term expansion.
Looking back at 2019–2020:
• The Fed ended tightening and began injecting liquidity
• Interest rates were cut
• Equity markets kept making new highs
That environment laid the groundwork for risk assets to recover and expand. What’s important is that many of those conditions are reappearing today: monetary policy is shifting more dovish, liquidity is improving, and market psychology is gradually moving away from the defensive mindset of 2022.
Because of that, the most reasonable scenario is this:
$ETH may still see another retest — potentially even a sweep of the April 2025 low — but that wouldn’t signal a bearish reversal. It would look more like a final accumulation phase before the longer-term trend fully reasserts itself.
#ETH #Ethereum

Guys, just look at this Monthly chart of $ETH

Looking at this, Ethereum is on its cyclical move. The view most of the analyst are having that it will make one more weak red candle and we will again see a bullish rally in ethereum.
Currently i am having a view of moderate bearishness in the short term and aggressive bullishness in the long run.
What I'll suggest is track the bottom to get a perfect entry for you and enjoy bumper profits.

If u want more such technical views do follow my page.
$ETH #GoldSilverRally #btc70k #ETH #Ethereum #Ethereum