Wendy 1
122 Publicaciones
Wendy 1
🇻🇳 Verified Binance Square & CoinmarketCap | Research | Insight | Onchain | DM for Collab & Promo @wendyr9
0 Siguiendo
0 Seguidores
0 Me gusta
Publicaciones
Ver traducción
$ASTER ASTER Burns Another 3.08 Million Tokens Under Its Upgraded Tokenomics
ASTER has released the latest update on its buyback and burn program.
Between June 29 and July 13, the protocol allocated 99% of its daily platform fees to buy back 3,083,815.69 ASTER for stakers.
At the same time, the team permanently burned an additional 3,083,815.69 ASTER from its own allocation, matching the amount purchased through platform revenue.
The latest figures bring the totals to:
🔥 6.02 million ASTER burned since the upgraded tokenomics launched on June 17, 2026.
🔥 183.8 million ASTER burned across all burn programs since inception.
Current estimated staking rewards are also attractive, with:
• 5.35% APY for a 26-week lock.
• 28.85% APY for the maximum 208-week lock.
By combining protocol fee buybacks, team-funded burns, and staking incentives, ASTER is building a tokenomics model designed to reward long-term participants while gradually reducing circulating supply.
ASTER has released the latest update on its buyback and burn program.
Between June 29 and July 13, the protocol allocated 99% of its daily platform fees to buy back 3,083,815.69 ASTER for stakers.
At the same time, the team permanently burned an additional 3,083,815.69 ASTER from its own allocation, matching the amount purchased through platform revenue.
The latest figures bring the totals to:
🔥 6.02 million ASTER burned since the upgraded tokenomics launched on June 17, 2026.
🔥 183.8 million ASTER burned across all burn programs since inception.
Current estimated staking rewards are also attractive, with:
• 5.35% APY for a 26-week lock.
• 28.85% APY for the maximum 208-week lock.
By combining protocol fee buybacks, team-funded burns, and staking incentives, ASTER is building a tokenomics model designed to reward long-term participants while gradually reducing circulating supply.
Ver traducción
$UNI Uniswap Moves Toward Buybacks and Token Burns
Uniswap could soon introduce one of the biggest changes to its tokenomics.
According to Uniswap founder Hayden Adams, protocol fees have now been activated, while governance proposals are underway to enable fee collection across Robinhood Chain (v2/v3), Uniswap v4, and bridge deployments on XLayer, Avalanche, MegaETH, and Sonium.
The next major step is expected to be $UNI buybacks and token burns.
If governance approves the proposals, this would mark the first continuous burn mechanism in Uniswap’s history.
The timing is notable because Uniswap remains one of the highest revenue-generating protocols in crypto, producing more than $5.2 million in daily fees, behind only a handful of major stablecoin issuers.
For many investors, the key question is no longer whether Uniswap can generate revenue, but whether that revenue will begin creating direct value for the UNI token through long-term supply reduction.
Uniswap could soon introduce one of the biggest changes to its tokenomics.
According to Uniswap founder Hayden Adams, protocol fees have now been activated, while governance proposals are underway to enable fee collection across Robinhood Chain (v2/v3), Uniswap v4, and bridge deployments on XLayer, Avalanche, MegaETH, and Sonium.
The next major step is expected to be $UNI buybacks and token burns.
If governance approves the proposals, this would mark the first continuous burn mechanism in Uniswap’s history.
The timing is notable because Uniswap remains one of the highest revenue-generating protocols in crypto, producing more than $5.2 million in daily fees, behind only a handful of major stablecoin issuers.
For many investors, the key question is no longer whether Uniswap can generate revenue, but whether that revenue will begin creating direct value for the UNI token through long-term supply reduction.
Ver traducción
NOXA Burns 40% of Supply After Generating Millions in Robinhood Chain Fees
NOXA is drawing attention after a series of notable developments.
Over the past 7 days, the protocol has generated approximately $7.66 million in fees on Robinhood Chain, making it one of the most active applications on the network.
At the same time, the project’s original $NOXA token, which launched on DBKChain in 2025, has suddenly become active again.
The biggest development came roughly 10 hours ago, when the team permanently burned 400,000 NOXA, representing 40% of the token’s total supply.
While NOXA has not announced any new token plans, the combination of:
• Strong protocol revenue on Robinhood Chain.
• A large token burn.
• Renewed activity around the original token.
…has led many community members to speculate that a Robinhood Chain deployment or ecosystem expansion could be next.
For now, this remains speculation until the team confirms its plans. However, it’s a project worth monitoring as Robinhood Chain continues to attract new protocols and liquidity.
NOXA is drawing attention after a series of notable developments.
Over the past 7 days, the protocol has generated approximately $7.66 million in fees on Robinhood Chain, making it one of the most active applications on the network.
At the same time, the project’s original $NOXA token, which launched on DBKChain in 2025, has suddenly become active again.
The biggest development came roughly 10 hours ago, when the team permanently burned 400,000 NOXA, representing 40% of the token’s total supply.
While NOXA has not announced any new token plans, the combination of:
• Strong protocol revenue on Robinhood Chain.
• A large token burn.
• Renewed activity around the original token.
…has led many community members to speculate that a Robinhood Chain deployment or ecosystem expansion could be next.
For now, this remains speculation until the team confirms its plans. However, it’s a project worth monitoring as Robinhood Chain continues to attract new protocols and liquidity.
Ver traducción
Hacked X Accounts Were Used to Promote a Fake Token, Generating Around $125K
A hacker reportedly compromised the @SpaceXAI and @Starlink X accounts to promote a newly created token called $SCATMAN.
According to the shared on-chain data:
• The attacker minted 10 trillion $SCATMAN tokens.
• Sold the entire position for approximately 59 ETH, worth around $108,000.
• A second wallet controlled by the attacker sold another 59.28 million SCATMAN for 14.7 ETH, worth roughly $27,000.
Total estimated proceeds were approximately $125,000.
The token briefly attracted significant trading activity after being promoted through compromised social media accounts before rapidly collapsing.
Incidents like this continue to highlight a common attack pattern in crypto:
1. Compromise a trusted or high-profile social media account.
2. Promote a newly created token.
3. Create FOMO within minutes.
4. Sell into the buying pressure before disappearing.
Wendy’s reminder:
Before buying any newly launched token, always verify announcements through multiple official channels. A verified account alone should never be considered proof that a token is legitimate.
Source: On-chain transaction data shared by the community.
A hacker reportedly compromised the @SpaceXAI and @Starlink X accounts to promote a newly created token called $SCATMAN.
According to the shared on-chain data:
• The attacker minted 10 trillion $SCATMAN tokens.
• Sold the entire position for approximately 59 ETH, worth around $108,000.
• A second wallet controlled by the attacker sold another 59.28 million SCATMAN for 14.7 ETH, worth roughly $27,000.
Total estimated proceeds were approximately $125,000.
The token briefly attracted significant trading activity after being promoted through compromised social media accounts before rapidly collapsing.
Incidents like this continue to highlight a common attack pattern in crypto:
1. Compromise a trusted or high-profile social media account.
2. Promote a newly created token.
3. Create FOMO within minutes.
4. Sell into the buying pressure before disappearing.
Wendy’s reminder:
Before buying any newly launched token, always verify announcements through multiple official channels. A verified account alone should never be considered proof that a token is legitimate.
Source: On-chain transaction data shared by the community.
Ver traducción
U.S. Public Companies Now Hold 92.7% of Corporate Bitcoin Worldwide
Corporate Bitcoin ownership continues to become increasingly concentrated in the United States.
According to data from River and BitcoinTreasuries.net:
🇺🇸 U.S. public companies now hold approximately 1.24 million BTC, representing 92.7% of all Bitcoin held by public companies globally.
Over the past 12 months alone, U.S. companies added around 510,000 BTC to their balance sheets.
For comparison, that’s more than three times the amount of new Bitcoin mined during the same period.
Much of this growth has been driven by companies such as Strategy, while an increasing number of U.S.-listed firms have also adopted Bitcoin as part of their treasury strategy.
This trend highlights how institutional demand is becoming an increasingly important source of Bitcoin accumulation.
Whether this pace continues remains to be seen, but corporate adoption is clearly becoming more concentrated in the U.S. market.
Source: River, BitcoinTreasuries.net.
Corporate Bitcoin ownership continues to become increasingly concentrated in the United States.
According to data from River and BitcoinTreasuries.net:
🇺🇸 U.S. public companies now hold approximately 1.24 million BTC, representing 92.7% of all Bitcoin held by public companies globally.
Over the past 12 months alone, U.S. companies added around 510,000 BTC to their balance sheets.
For comparison, that’s more than three times the amount of new Bitcoin mined during the same period.
Much of this growth has been driven by companies such as Strategy, while an increasing number of U.S.-listed firms have also adopted Bitcoin as part of their treasury strategy.
This trend highlights how institutional demand is becoming an increasingly important source of Bitcoin accumulation.
Whether this pace continues remains to be seen, but corporate adoption is clearly becoming more concentrated in the U.S. market.
Source: River, BitcoinTreasuries.net.
Ver traducción
Binance Now Holds 57% of All Exchange Stablecoin Reserves
According to Binance Research, stablecoin reserves across major crypto exchanges have grown to approximately $93 billion.
The standout figure is Binance.
The exchange currently holds around $53 billion in stablecoins, representing 57% of all exchange stablecoin reserves. That’s roughly $42 billion more than the second-largest exchange.
Since the beginning of 2025:
📈 Total exchange stablecoin reserves have increased 61%, adding around $35 billion.
📈 Binance’s share has also expanded from 54% to 57%.
Why does this matter?
Stablecoins are often viewed as a proxy for available trading liquidity. Higher reserves can indicate greater capital waiting to enter the market, stronger market activity, and deeper liquidity for traders.
While stablecoin balances alone don’t predict market direction, they provide useful insight into where capital is being held.
In this case, Binance continues to be the dominant venue for stablecoin liquidity.
Source: Binance Research.
According to Binance Research, stablecoin reserves across major crypto exchanges have grown to approximately $93 billion.
The standout figure is Binance.
The exchange currently holds around $53 billion in stablecoins, representing 57% of all exchange stablecoin reserves. That’s roughly $42 billion more than the second-largest exchange.
Since the beginning of 2025:
📈 Total exchange stablecoin reserves have increased 61%, adding around $35 billion.
📈 Binance’s share has also expanded from 54% to 57%.
Why does this matter?
Stablecoins are often viewed as a proxy for available trading liquidity. Higher reserves can indicate greater capital waiting to enter the market, stronger market activity, and deeper liquidity for traders.
While stablecoin balances alone don’t predict market direction, they provide useful insight into where capital is being held.
In this case, Binance continues to be the dominant venue for stablecoin liquidity.
Source: Binance Research.
Ver traducción
Which Altcoin Is Leading DeFi? It Depends on the Metric.
Looking at only price rarely tells the full story.
Different DeFi projects dominate different categories.
Current leaders include:
📊 MCap / TVL: XPL (0.33x)
💰 Staking / Yield APY: AVAX (902k%)
💵 Fees / Revenue: CC ($57M)
📉 Price-to-Fees Ratio: WLFI (13x)
👥 Daily Active Users: AERO (3,192)
🔄 DEX Volume: HYPE ($8B)
📈 30-Day TVL Growth: STBL (+293%)
🏦 Total Value Locked: LDO ($16B)
The interesting part is that no single protocol leads every category.
Some projects generate the most revenue.
Others attract the most liquidity.
Some grow the fastest, while others already dominate in scale.
That’s why evaluating DeFi through multiple metrics often provides a clearer picture than looking at token price alone.
If you had to own just one DeFi project today, which would it be?
Looking at only price rarely tells the full story.
Different DeFi projects dominate different categories.
Current leaders include:
📊 MCap / TVL: XPL (0.33x)
💰 Staking / Yield APY: AVAX (902k%)
💵 Fees / Revenue: CC ($57M)
📉 Price-to-Fees Ratio: WLFI (13x)
👥 Daily Active Users: AERO (3,192)
🔄 DEX Volume: HYPE ($8B)
📈 30-Day TVL Growth: STBL (+293%)
🏦 Total Value Locked: LDO ($16B)
The interesting part is that no single protocol leads every category.
Some projects generate the most revenue.
Others attract the most liquidity.
Some grow the fastest, while others already dominate in scale.
That’s why evaluating DeFi through multiple metrics often provides a clearer picture than looking at token price alone.
If you had to own just one DeFi project today, which would it be?
Ver traducción
Solana OG Loses 181,000 SOL ($14.2M) in Major Wallet Theft
A long-time Solana holder reportedly lost approximately 181,000 SOL, worth around $14.2 million, after their wallet was compromised.
According to on-chain investigator @zachxbt, the attacker quickly moved the stolen funds through several steps:
• Stole 181,000 SOL from the victim’s wallet
• Sold the entire SOL balance
• Bridged the proceeds from Solana to Ethereum
• Swapped the funds into approximately 7,918 ETH
The movement of funds can be tracked on-chain, highlighting both the transparency of public blockchains and the speed at which stolen assets can be laundered across multiple networks.
Incidents like this serve as another reminder that security remains one of the most important aspects of crypto ownership.
Some basic precautions include:
• Store large holdings in a hardware wallet
• Never share or digitally store your seed phrase
• Carefully review every wallet signature before approving it
• Stay cautious of phishing websites and fake wallet pop-ups
While blockchain transactions are transparent, recovering stolen assets is often extremely difficult once funds have been moved across chains.
Source: @zachxbt, Arkham Intelligence.
A long-time Solana holder reportedly lost approximately 181,000 SOL, worth around $14.2 million, after their wallet was compromised.
According to on-chain investigator @zachxbt, the attacker quickly moved the stolen funds through several steps:
• Stole 181,000 SOL from the victim’s wallet
• Sold the entire SOL balance
• Bridged the proceeds from Solana to Ethereum
• Swapped the funds into approximately 7,918 ETH
The movement of funds can be tracked on-chain, highlighting both the transparency of public blockchains and the speed at which stolen assets can be laundered across multiple networks.
Incidents like this serve as another reminder that security remains one of the most important aspects of crypto ownership.
Some basic precautions include:
• Store large holdings in a hardware wallet
• Never share or digitally store your seed phrase
• Carefully review every wallet signature before approving it
• Stay cautious of phishing websites and fake wallet pop-ups
While blockchain transactions are transparent, recovering stolen assets is often extremely difficult once funds have been moved across chains.
Source: @zachxbt, Arkham Intelligence.
Ver traducción
Not All “Privacy Coins” Are Actually Privacy Coins
The term privacy coin is often used too broadly.
In reality, these projects solve very different problems.
1. Retail transaction privacy
Projects like Monero (XMR), Zcash (ZEC), Dash (DASH), Pirate Chain (ARRR) and Zano (ZANO) are what most people traditionally mean by privacy coins.
Their goal is to protect transaction details by hiding the sender, receiver, amount, or a combination of all three.
2. Institutional confidentiality
Projects such as Concordium (CCD) and Canton Coin (CC) focus on a different use case.
Instead of anonymous payments, they aim to keep business transactions confidential while still allowing regulators or auditors to access information when authorized.
3. Computational privacy
ZAMA takes another approach.
Rather than hiding transactions, it enables applications to perform computations directly on encrypted data through Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE).
The privacy exists during computation, not during asset transfers.
4. Zero-knowledge scaling
Projects like Starknet (STRK) and zkSync (ZK) are frequently mistaken for privacy coins.
In reality, they use zero-knowledge proofs to improve scalability and verify transactions efficiently.
Transaction data itself remains publicly visible on-chain.
Why this distinction matters
“Zero-knowledge” doesn’t automatically mean “private.”
Likewise, a project using cryptography doesn’t necessarily aim to provide anonymous transactions.
Understanding the difference between transaction privacy, institutional confidentiality, encrypted computation, and scaling technology helps avoid one of the most common misconceptions in crypto.
The term privacy coin is often used too broadly.
In reality, these projects solve very different problems.
1. Retail transaction privacy
Projects like Monero (XMR), Zcash (ZEC), Dash (DASH), Pirate Chain (ARRR) and Zano (ZANO) are what most people traditionally mean by privacy coins.
Their goal is to protect transaction details by hiding the sender, receiver, amount, or a combination of all three.
2. Institutional confidentiality
Projects such as Concordium (CCD) and Canton Coin (CC) focus on a different use case.
Instead of anonymous payments, they aim to keep business transactions confidential while still allowing regulators or auditors to access information when authorized.
3. Computational privacy
ZAMA takes another approach.
Rather than hiding transactions, it enables applications to perform computations directly on encrypted data through Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE).
The privacy exists during computation, not during asset transfers.
4. Zero-knowledge scaling
Projects like Starknet (STRK) and zkSync (ZK) are frequently mistaken for privacy coins.
In reality, they use zero-knowledge proofs to improve scalability and verify transactions efficiently.
Transaction data itself remains publicly visible on-chain.
Why this distinction matters
“Zero-knowledge” doesn’t automatically mean “private.”
Likewise, a project using cryptography doesn’t necessarily aim to provide anonymous transactions.
Understanding the difference between transaction privacy, institutional confidentiality, encrypted computation, and scaling technology helps avoid one of the most common misconceptions in crypto.
Ver traducción
This or That: Which Projects Would You Choose?
Let’s make it simple.
If you could only pick one project from each pair, which would you choose?
Layer 1
🔹 SUI or SEI
DePIN / Compute
🔹 AKT or IO
Lending
🔹 MORPHO or SYRUP (Maple)
DePIN / AI Compute
🔹 AETHIR or RENDER
RWA
🔹 ONDO or PLUME
If I had to choose today:
✅ SUI
✅ IO
✅ MORPHO
✅ RENDER
✅ ONDO
Of course, every project has different strengths. Some focus on ecosystem growth, some on infrastructure, while others target institutions or AI.
There isn’t a single “correct” answer, and that’s what makes these comparisons interesting.
What’s your list?
Let’s make it simple.
If you could only pick one project from each pair, which would you choose?
Layer 1
🔹 SUI or SEI
DePIN / Compute
🔹 AKT or IO
Lending
🔹 MORPHO or SYRUP (Maple)
DePIN / AI Compute
🔹 AETHIR or RENDER
RWA
🔹 ONDO or PLUME
If I had to choose today:
✅ SUI
✅ IO
✅ MORPHO
✅ RENDER
✅ ONDO
Of course, every project has different strengths. Some focus on ecosystem growth, some on infrastructure, while others target institutions or AI.
There isn’t a single “correct” answer, and that’s what makes these comparisons interesting.
What’s your list?
Ver traducción
Robinhood Chain Reached $100M TVL in Just 9 Days. Is Distribution the Real Moat?
Robinhood Chain has officially become the fastest Layer 2 ever to reach $100 million in TVL, doing so in just 9 days.
Current ranking:
🥇 Robinhood: 9 days
🥈 Boba: 10 days
🥉 Arbitrum: 13 days
• zkSync Era: 17 days
• Base: 17 days
• Metis: 30 days
What’s interesting is how Robinhood achieved it.
Unlike many recent L2 launches, Robinhood didn’t rely on a token, an airdrop or a points campaign. Instead, it launched with something arguably more valuable: distribution.
With millions of existing users, tokenized stock trading available from day one, and promotional incentives like free gas, Robinhood quickly attracted liquidity and activity.
However, TVL alone doesn’t tell the whole story.
A significant portion of the liquidity currently comes from a small number of DeFi protocols, and history shows that reaching $100M TVL quickly doesn’t necessarily guarantee long-term success. Projects like Base, Boba and zkSync all reached the milestone at different times, but their adoption trajectories have been very different.
The next questions worth watching are:
• Can Robinhood maintain growth after promotional incentives end?
• Will users remain active beyond the initial launch period?
• Can TVL become more diversified over time?
Early momentum is impressive, but long-term adoption is what ultimately defines a successful blockchain ecosystem.
Source: DefiLlama.
Robinhood Chain has officially become the fastest Layer 2 ever to reach $100 million in TVL, doing so in just 9 days.
Current ranking:
🥇 Robinhood: 9 days
🥈 Boba: 10 days
🥉 Arbitrum: 13 days
• zkSync Era: 17 days
• Base: 17 days
• Metis: 30 days
What’s interesting is how Robinhood achieved it.
Unlike many recent L2 launches, Robinhood didn’t rely on a token, an airdrop or a points campaign. Instead, it launched with something arguably more valuable: distribution.
With millions of existing users, tokenized stock trading available from day one, and promotional incentives like free gas, Robinhood quickly attracted liquidity and activity.
However, TVL alone doesn’t tell the whole story.
A significant portion of the liquidity currently comes from a small number of DeFi protocols, and history shows that reaching $100M TVL quickly doesn’t necessarily guarantee long-term success. Projects like Base, Boba and zkSync all reached the milestone at different times, but their adoption trajectories have been very different.
The next questions worth watching are:
• Can Robinhood maintain growth after promotional incentives end?
• Will users remain active beyond the initial launch period?
• Can TVL become more diversified over time?
Early momentum is impressive, but long-term adoption is what ultimately defines a successful blockchain ecosystem.
Source: DefiLlama.
$BTC Según se informó, Strategy vendió otros 2.225 BTC la semana pasada, recaudando $135M a un precio de venta promedio de $60.773 por Bitcoin. Esto sigue a la venta de la semana anterior de 1.363 BTC por $81M, ejecutada a un precio promedio de $59.256. En el periodo de dos semanas, Strategy redujo su posición en 3.588 BTC, generando $216M en ingresos en conjunto. Las tenencias actuales reportadas ascienden a 843.775 BTC.
$BTC Alguien creó una nueva wallet "0x243," depositó 52.67 $BTC ($3 .26M) en #HyperLiquid para vender y luego abrió una posición larga de 14.189M $XRP (20x) valorada en $16.3M.
La posición ya está con una ganancia flotante de ~$477K.
La posición ya está con una ganancia flotante de ~$477K.
A medida que $ANSEM continúa en aumento, superando una capitalización de mercado de $350M+, las tenencias de $ANSEM de Ansem’s (@blknoiz06) ahora tienen un valor de más de $204M.
La ballena "0x50b" ha cerrado su posición corta de $ETH, perdiendo $9.386M en esta operación.
La ballena vio cómo su beneficio total bajaba de $6.6M a -$2.3M. La ballena aún mantiene una posición larga de 228.7 $BTC (20x).
La ballena vio cómo su beneficio total bajaba de $6.6M a -$2.3M. La ballena aún mantiene una posición larga de 228.7 $BTC (20x).
Dos inversores invirtieron 10.000 $ en cripto a finales de 2016.
Uno compró Bitcoin. El otro eligió Ethereum.
Avancemos diez años:
🔸 Bitcoin: 10.000 $ → 640.000 $
🔹 Ethereum: 10.000 $ → 2,17 millones
El mismo capital inicial. El mismo horizonte temporal. Resultados muy diferentes.
Bitcoin entregó aproximadamente una rentabilidad de 64x, mientras que Ethereum generó alrededor de 217x, impulsado en gran medida por su crecimiento explosivo durante el auge de DeFi, NFT y los contratos inteligentes.
Por supuesto, el camino no fue sencillo. Ambos activos experimentaron múltiples caídas (drawdowns) de más del 70%, y Ethereum vio incluso una volatilidad mayor durante todo el ciclo.
La gran pregunta ahora es:
Bitcoin ofrece la mayor adopción institucional, la demanda de ETFs y la narrativa de “oro digital”.
Ethereum sigue siendo el ecosistema de contratos inteligentes más grande, impulsando DeFi, stablecoins (monedas estables), tokenización y activos del mundo real.
En la próxima década, ¿el capital seguirá favoreciendo la escasez de Bitcoin y su tesis como reserva de valor, o los efectos de red y la utilidad de Ethereum volverán a entregar mayores rendimientos?
Si hoy tuvieras 10.000 $ para invertir durante los próximos 10 años, ¿qué elegirías: $BTC o $ETH ? 👇
Uno compró Bitcoin. El otro eligió Ethereum.
Avancemos diez años:
🔸 Bitcoin: 10.000 $ → 640.000 $
🔹 Ethereum: 10.000 $ → 2,17 millones
El mismo capital inicial. El mismo horizonte temporal. Resultados muy diferentes.
Bitcoin entregó aproximadamente una rentabilidad de 64x, mientras que Ethereum generó alrededor de 217x, impulsado en gran medida por su crecimiento explosivo durante el auge de DeFi, NFT y los contratos inteligentes.
Por supuesto, el camino no fue sencillo. Ambos activos experimentaron múltiples caídas (drawdowns) de más del 70%, y Ethereum vio incluso una volatilidad mayor durante todo el ciclo.
La gran pregunta ahora es:
Bitcoin ofrece la mayor adopción institucional, la demanda de ETFs y la narrativa de “oro digital”.
Ethereum sigue siendo el ecosistema de contratos inteligentes más grande, impulsando DeFi, stablecoins (monedas estables), tokenización y activos del mundo real.
En la próxima década, ¿el capital seguirá favoreciendo la escasez de Bitcoin y su tesis como reserva de valor, o los efectos de red y la utilidad de Ethereum volverán a entregar mayores rendimientos?
Si hoy tuvieras 10.000 $ para invertir durante los próximos 10 años, ¿qué elegirías: $BTC o $ETH ? 👇
$ETH por debajo de $2.000 se siente doloroso — Pero muchas altcoins lo han hecho aún peor en 2026
El hecho de que Ethereum cotice por debajo del nivel psicológico de $2.000 sin duda ha afectado negativamente al sentimiento del mercado. Sin embargo, varias altcoins importantes han sufrido caídas aún más profundas este año.
Mayores peores resultados frente a ETH en 2026
🔻 DATOS: -83%
🔻 APT: -67%
🔻 OP: -63%
🔻 ZK: -62%
🔻 VET: -61%
🔻 XTZ: -57%
🔻 DOT: -55%
🔻 ADA: -54%
🔻 AVAX: -52%
🔻 SUI: -51%
La lista pone de relieve una realidad importante de este ciclo de mercado: tener un rendimiento inferior a Bitcoin es doloroso, pero superar negativamente a Ethereum ha sido aún más costoso.
Surgen varios temas:
• Los tokens de Capa 2 como OP y ZK han luchado con desbloqueos de tokens y una competencia cada vez mayor.
• Las Capa 1 heredadas, incluidas ADA, DOT, XTZ y VET, continúan enfrentando desafíos para atraer capital y actividad de usuarios.
• Proyectos con alto FDV como APT han sufrido por la expansión continua de la oferta y la débil demanda del mercado.
• Incluso ecosistemas más nuevos como SUI y AVAX han experimentado correcciones significativas a pesar de la sólida actividad de desarrollo.
Mientras tanto, el propio Ethereum ha caído de forma considerable, pero su resistencia relativa frente a muchas altcoins vuelve a demostrar la preferencia del mercado por activos más grandes y más líquidos durante periodos de incertidumbre.
La lección de 2026 ha quedado clara: cuando la liquidez se ajusta, el capital tiende a consolidarse en un pequeño número de activos dominantes, mientras que muchas altcoins sufren caídas mucho más pronunciadas.
¿Cuáles de estos tokens todavía sigues manteniendo? 👇
El hecho de que Ethereum cotice por debajo del nivel psicológico de $2.000 sin duda ha afectado negativamente al sentimiento del mercado. Sin embargo, varias altcoins importantes han sufrido caídas aún más profundas este año.
Mayores peores resultados frente a ETH en 2026
🔻 DATOS: -83%
🔻 APT: -67%
🔻 OP: -63%
🔻 ZK: -62%
🔻 VET: -61%
🔻 XTZ: -57%
🔻 DOT: -55%
🔻 ADA: -54%
🔻 AVAX: -52%
🔻 SUI: -51%
La lista pone de relieve una realidad importante de este ciclo de mercado: tener un rendimiento inferior a Bitcoin es doloroso, pero superar negativamente a Ethereum ha sido aún más costoso.
Surgen varios temas:
• Los tokens de Capa 2 como OP y ZK han luchado con desbloqueos de tokens y una competencia cada vez mayor.
• Las Capa 1 heredadas, incluidas ADA, DOT, XTZ y VET, continúan enfrentando desafíos para atraer capital y actividad de usuarios.
• Proyectos con alto FDV como APT han sufrido por la expansión continua de la oferta y la débil demanda del mercado.
• Incluso ecosistemas más nuevos como SUI y AVAX han experimentado correcciones significativas a pesar de la sólida actividad de desarrollo.
Mientras tanto, el propio Ethereum ha caído de forma considerable, pero su resistencia relativa frente a muchas altcoins vuelve a demostrar la preferencia del mercado por activos más grandes y más líquidos durante periodos de incertidumbre.
La lección de 2026 ha quedado clara: cuando la liquidez se ajusta, el capital tiende a consolidarse en un pequeño número de activos dominantes, mientras que muchas altcoins sufren caídas mucho más pronunciadas.
¿Cuáles de estos tokens todavía sigues manteniendo? 👇
Si Hubieras Invertido $10,000 Cuando Trump Asumió el Cargo, Aquí Está Cuánto Sería Hoy 📉 Desde el inicio del actual mandato de Trump, la mayoría de los principales criptoactivos han superado significativamente a la baja, y solo Bitcoin ha demostrado ser relativamente resistente. 📊 $10,000 Invertidos Entonces vs. Hoy • BTC: $5,910 • ETH: $4 ,890 • TAO: $4 ,570 • LINK: $3 ,280 • SOL: $3 ,060 • KAS: $2,290 • RENDER: $2,090 • INJ: $2,000 • ICP: $1 ,870 • SUI: $1 ,640 • DOT: $1 ,230 • APT: $660 • MELANIA: $125 Los datos resaltan la gravedad de la reciente corrección del mercado. Si bien Bitcoin ha perdido aproximadamente 41% de la inversión inicial, muchas altcoins han registrado caídas de 70%–95%, y los tokens especulativos han sufrido los mayores descensos. En particular: • Bitcoin sigue siendo el mejor desempeño entre los activos principales. • Ethereum y los principales tokens relacionados con IA como TAO se han mantenido mejor que la mayoría de las altcoins. • Los activos de alta beta, como APT, DOT y MELANIA, han visto algunas de las pérdidas más pronunciadas. • La diferencia entre el rendimiento de BTC y el de las altcoins continúa ampliándose, reforzando el papel de Bitcoin como el activo dominante del mercado durante períodos de incertidumbre. Este ciclo demuestra una vez más una lección cripto familiar: durante las caídas del mercado, el capital tiende a rotar hacia la calidad y la liquidez, mientras que los activos especulativos a menudo experimentan las caídas más profundas. 📉📈
$BTC LAS CLAVES PERDIDAS VUELVEN A MOVERSE Los antiguos monederos de BTC de Clifton Collins acaban de enviar otros 500 BTC a Coinbase Prime. Se trata de $30.85M que se desplazan desde monedas que supuestamente debían ser prácticamente inalcanzables durante una década. El mismo grupo ahora ha depositado 1,500 BTC en Coinbase Prime y Wintermute en solo 3 meses. Esto sugiere que alguien recuperó el acceso, controló las claves todo el tiempo o encontró una vía que el mercado no contempló. La señal más importante es lo que permanece sin tocar. 4,500 BTC siguen ahí. Aproximadamente $276M esperando detrás de la próxima transacción. #Bitcoin
Inicia sesión para explorar más contenidos