Crypto keeps finding ways to make transactions faster, cheaper and more accessible. Look at $PUMP and the attention around onchain activity right now. But there’s another part of Web3 we should think about: Communication. If sending a message costs basically nothing, spammers can send thousands. Bots flood inboxes. Scammers reach users at scale. And the real cost gets pushed onto our attention. That’s why I find @Liberdus interesting. A small cost attached to sending messages can make mass spam far less attractive while keeping genuine conversations practical. It’s not about making communication expensive. It’s about making abuse expensive. Crypto solved a lot of problems around transferring value. Maybe decentralized communication deserves the same level of thinking.