What if liquidity providers didn't have to choose between being a lender or a borrower?
That's one TermMax feature I find surprisingly interesting.
TermMax supports Two-Way Range Orders, where one position can contain both a borrowing curve and a lending curve. As market activity changes, the position can participate on either side of the market.
To me, that's more than a different order type.
It changes how liquidity can be deployed. Instead of committing capital to only one direction, a user can define terms for both sides and let market activity determine which side gets filled.
TermMax also has a broader system of range-order setters, market takers and curators, each with different roles in determining pricing and deploying liquidity.
And this connects back to TMX: the March 2026 whitepaper describes TMX as the protocol's utility and governance token, with governance and staking among its core functions.
The question I find interesting is whether this flexibility can translate into deeper, more efficient markets as TermMax grows.
#termmax @TermMax
That's one TermMax feature I find surprisingly interesting.
TermMax supports Two-Way Range Orders, where one position can contain both a borrowing curve and a lending curve. As market activity changes, the position can participate on either side of the market.
To me, that's more than a different order type.
It changes how liquidity can be deployed. Instead of committing capital to only one direction, a user can define terms for both sides and let market activity determine which side gets filled.
TermMax also has a broader system of range-order setters, market takers and curators, each with different roles in determining pricing and deploying liquidity.
And this connects back to TMX: the March 2026 whitepaper describes TMX as the protocol's utility and governance token, with governance and staking among its core functions.
The question I find interesting is whether this flexibility can translate into deeper, more efficient markets as TermMax grows.
#termmax @TermMax