Binance Square

Cryptopolitan

image
Creador verificado
Crypto news that doesn't waste your time. Breaking updates, market analysis, on-chain insights. Building the smartest crypto community.
1 Siguiendo
161.2K+ Seguidores
570.7K+ Me gusta
55.1K+ compartieron
Publicaciones
PINNED
·
--
At Cryptopolitan, we research, analyze, and deliver news—daily. From breaking updates to in-depth analysis, educational guides, and market insights, we’re here to keep you informed with neutral and authentic news. Thank you for trusting us to be your go-to source!
At Cryptopolitan, we research, analyze, and deliver news—daily.

From breaking updates to in-depth analysis, educational guides, and market insights, we’re here to keep you informed with neutral and authentic news.

Thank you for trusting us to be your go-to source!
Google says its AI chatbot Gemini is facing large-scale “distillation attacks”Google’s AI chatbot Gemini has become the target of a large-scale information heist, with attackers hammering the system with questions to copy how it works. One operation alone sent more than 100,000 queries to the chatbot, trying to pull out the secret patterns that make it smart. The company reported Thursday that these so-called “distillation attacks” are getting worse. Bad actors send wave after wave of questions to figure out the logic behind Gemini’s responses. Their goal is simple: steal Google’s technology to build or improve their own AI systems without spending billions on development. Google believes most attackers are private businesses or researchers looking to get ahead without doing the hard work. The attacks came from around the world, according to the company’s report. John Hultquist, who leads Google’s Threat Intelligence Group, said smaller companies using custom AI tools will likely face similar attacks soon. Tech firms have thrown billions of dollars at building their AI chatbots. The inner workings of these systems are treated like crown jewels. Even with defenses in place to catch these attacks, major AI systems remain easy targets because anyone with internet access can talk to them. Last year, OpenAI pointed fingers at Chinese company DeepSeek, claiming it used distillation to make its models better. Cryptopolitan reported on January 30 that Italy and Ireland banned DeepSeek after OpenAI accused the Chinese firm of using distillation to steal its AI models. The technique lets companies copy expensive technology at a fraction of the cost. Why are attackers doing this? The economics are brutal. Building a state-of-the-art AI model costs hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars. DeepSeek reportedly built its R1 model for around six million dollars using distillation, while ChatGPT-5’s development topped two billion dollars, according to industry reports. Stealing a model’s logic cuts that massive investment to almost nothing. Many of the attacks on Gemini targeted the algorithms that help it “reason” or process information, Google said. Companies that train their own AI systems on sensitive data – like 100 years of trading strategies or customer information – now face the same threat. “Let’s say your LLM has been trained on 100 years of secret thinking of the way you trade. Theoretically, you could distill some of that,” Hultquist explained. Nation-state hackers join the hunt The problem goes beyond money-hungry companies. APT31, a Chinese government hacking group hit with US sanctions in March 2024, used Gemini late last year to plan actual cyberattacks against American organizations. The group paired Gemini with Hexstrike, an open-source hacking tool that can run more than 150 security programs. They analyzed remote code execution flaws, ways to bypass web security, and SQL injection attacks – all aimed at specific US targets, according to Google’s report. Cryptopolitan covered similar AI security concerns previously, warning that hackers were exploiting AI vulnerabilities. The APT31 case shows those warnings were spot-on. Hultquist pointed to two major worries. Adversaries operating across entire intrusions with minimal human help, and automating the development of attack tools. “These are two ways where adversaries can get major advantages and move through the intrusion cycle with minimal human interference,” he said. The window between discovering a software weakness and getting a fix in place, called the patch gap,  could widen dramatically. Organizations often take weeks to deploy defenses. With AI agents finding and testing vulnerabilities automatically, attackers could move much faster. “We are going to have to leverage the advantages of AI, and increasingly remove humans from the loop, so that we can respond at machine speed,” Hultquist told The Register. The financial stakes are enormous. IBM’s 2024 data breach report found that intellectual property theft now costs organizations $173 per record, with IP-focused breaches jumping 27% year-over-year. AI model weights represent the highest-value targets in this underground economy – a single stolen frontier model could fetch hundreds of millions on the black market. Google has shut down accounts linked to these campaigns, but the attacks keep coming from “throughout the globe,” Hultquist said. As AI becomes more powerful and more companies rely on it, expect this digital gold rush to intensify. The question isn’t whether more attacks will come, but whether defenders can keep up. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Google says its AI chatbot Gemini is facing large-scale “distillation attacks”

Google’s AI chatbot Gemini has become the target of a large-scale information heist, with attackers hammering the system with questions to copy how it works. One operation alone sent more than 100,000 queries to the chatbot, trying to pull out the secret patterns that make it smart.

The company reported Thursday that these so-called “distillation attacks” are getting worse. Bad actors send wave after wave of questions to figure out the logic behind Gemini’s responses. Their goal is simple: steal Google’s technology to build or improve their own AI systems without spending billions on development.

Google believes most attackers are private businesses or researchers looking to get ahead without doing the hard work. The attacks came from around the world, according to the company’s report. John Hultquist, who leads Google’s Threat Intelligence Group, said smaller companies using custom AI tools will likely face similar attacks soon.

Tech firms have thrown billions of dollars at building their AI chatbots. The inner workings of these systems are treated like crown jewels. Even with defenses in place to catch these attacks, major AI systems remain easy targets because anyone with internet access can talk to them.

Last year, OpenAI pointed fingers at Chinese company DeepSeek, claiming it used distillation to make its models better. Cryptopolitan reported on January 30 that Italy and Ireland banned DeepSeek after OpenAI accused the Chinese firm of using distillation to steal its AI models. The technique lets companies copy expensive technology at a fraction of the cost.

Why are attackers doing this?

The economics are brutal. Building a state-of-the-art AI model costs hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars. DeepSeek reportedly built its R1 model for around six million dollars using distillation, while ChatGPT-5’s development topped two billion dollars, according to industry reports. Stealing a model’s logic cuts that massive investment to almost nothing.

Many of the attacks on Gemini targeted the algorithms that help it “reason” or process information, Google said. Companies that train their own AI systems on sensitive data – like 100 years of trading strategies or customer information – now face the same threat.

“Let’s say your LLM has been trained on 100 years of secret thinking of the way you trade. Theoretically, you could distill some of that,” Hultquist explained.

Nation-state hackers join the hunt

The problem goes beyond money-hungry companies. APT31, a Chinese government hacking group hit with US sanctions in March 2024, used Gemini late last year to plan actual cyberattacks against American organizations.

The group paired Gemini with Hexstrike, an open-source hacking tool that can run more than 150 security programs. They analyzed remote code execution flaws, ways to bypass web security, and SQL injection attacks – all aimed at specific US targets, according to Google’s report.

Cryptopolitan covered similar AI security concerns previously, warning that hackers were exploiting AI vulnerabilities. The APT31 case shows those warnings were spot-on.

Hultquist pointed to two major worries. Adversaries operating across entire intrusions with minimal human help, and automating the development of attack tools. “These are two ways where adversaries can get major advantages and move through the intrusion cycle with minimal human interference,” he said.

The window between discovering a software weakness and getting a fix in place, called the patch gap,  could widen dramatically. Organizations often take weeks to deploy defenses. With AI agents finding and testing vulnerabilities automatically, attackers could move much faster.

“We are going to have to leverage the advantages of AI, and increasingly remove humans from the loop, so that we can respond at machine speed,” Hultquist told The Register.

The financial stakes are enormous. IBM’s 2024 data breach report found that intellectual property theft now costs organizations $173 per record, with IP-focused breaches jumping 27% year-over-year. AI model weights represent the highest-value targets in this underground economy – a single stolen frontier model could fetch hundreds of millions on the black market.

Google has shut down accounts linked to these campaigns, but the attacks keep coming from “throughout the globe,” Hultquist said. As AI becomes more powerful and more companies rely on it, expect this digital gold rush to intensify. The question isn’t whether more attacks will come, but whether defenders can keep up.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.
Singapore's Lawrence Wong unveils 2026 budget focused on AI and financial market growthSingapore’s Prime Minister Lawrence Wong laid out a spending plan on February 12 that puts artificial intelligence and financial market growth as the country’s future, as the government eyes a smaller budget surplus this year compared to last. The government expects to end the coming financial year, which starts in April, with a surplus of SG$8.5 billion. That is well below the SG$15.1 billion surplus recorded in 2025. Wong said last year’s figure was higher than anticipated as the economy grew faster than forecast, bringing in more corporate tax money, along with stronger sales of private vehicles and properties that pushed vehicle tax and stamp duty collections up. A smaller but steady surplus Even with a lower surplus, the government says it is on solid ground. The projected surplus works out to roughly 1% of the country’s GDP, enough to fund targeted programmes without drawing on the country’s reserves. Singapore has only drawn on those reserves twice before: once during the 2008 global financial crisis and again during the COVID-19 pandemic. With trade tensions and rapid technological change shaking up industries, Wong said the 2026 budget is focused on making Singapore more competitive over the long run. A large part of that plan centres on getting more companies and workers to use AI. Wong announced the creation of a “national AI council” that he will personally chair. “AI is a powerful tool, but it is still a tool. It must serve our national interests and our people,” he said. The council will oversee four focus areas: advanced manufacturing, connectivity, finance, and healthcare, with the aim of pushing Singapore toward becoming a leading AI hub. Singapore will establish a national AI council | Source: @MOFsg To help businesses make the shift, the government is launching a “Champions of AI” programme. It will offer tailored support to companies looking to use AI to change how they operate, covering both business transformation and staff training. Wong said companies that succeed under the programme would set standards for their industries and push others to follow. Firms can also benefit from an expansion of the Enterprise Innovation Scheme, which already gives businesses a 400% tax deduction on qualifying costs. AI spending will now count under the scheme, though there is a cap of SG$50,000 (about $39,654) per year for 2027 and 2028. On the worker side, Wong said every Singaporean can take steps to learn AI skills. The government will redesign its SkillsFuture website to make it easier for people to find AI courses that match their job needs and skill level. SkillsFuture gives Singaporeans credits to sign up for courses starting at age 25. Wong also acknowledged that while basic AI tools are free, more advanced features often come with a price tag. To help with that, people who complete selected AI training courses will get six months of free access to premium AI tools. “This will allow them to practice, experiment, and apply what they have learnt,” he said. Boosting the stock market On the financial markets side, the government announced it would add SG$1.5 billion (about $1.18 billion) to the Financial Sector Development Fund. Set up in 1999, the fund hands out grants to build Singapore up as a global financial centre. The new injection follows a SG$5 billion Equity Market Development Programme announced in 2025. That programme has helped the Straits Times Index climb 22.67% last year, its best annual performance since 2009. Of the original SG$5 billion, SG$4 billion has already been placed with nine asset managers, with the rest due to follow in the second quarter of 2026. The government also plans to make it easier for fast-growing companies to list on the stock exchange and to set up a dual-listing link between the Singapore Exchange and Nasdaq. “These measures will enhance the depth and vibrancy of our public equities market and provide more pathways for enterprises to grow and scale from Singapore,” Wong said. Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Singapore's Lawrence Wong unveils 2026 budget focused on AI and financial market growth

Singapore’s Prime Minister Lawrence Wong laid out a spending plan on February 12 that puts artificial intelligence and financial market growth as the country’s future, as the government eyes a smaller budget surplus this year compared to last.

The government expects to end the coming financial year, which starts in April, with a surplus of SG$8.5 billion. That is well below the SG$15.1 billion surplus recorded in 2025.

Wong said last year’s figure was higher than anticipated as the economy grew faster than forecast, bringing in more corporate tax money, along with stronger sales of private vehicles and properties that pushed vehicle tax and stamp duty collections up.

A smaller but steady surplus

Even with a lower surplus, the government says it is on solid ground. The projected surplus works out to roughly 1% of the country’s GDP, enough to fund targeted programmes without drawing on the country’s reserves. Singapore has only drawn on those reserves twice before: once during the 2008 global financial crisis and again during the COVID-19 pandemic.

With trade tensions and rapid technological change shaking up industries, Wong said the 2026 budget is focused on making Singapore more competitive over the long run.

A large part of that plan centres on getting more companies and workers to use AI. Wong announced the creation of a “national AI council” that he will personally chair. “AI is a powerful tool, but it is still a tool. It must serve our national interests and our people,” he said. The council will oversee four focus areas: advanced manufacturing, connectivity, finance, and healthcare, with the aim of pushing Singapore toward becoming a leading AI hub.

Singapore will establish a national AI council | Source: @MOFsg

To help businesses make the shift, the government is launching a “Champions of AI” programme. It will offer tailored support to companies looking to use AI to change how they operate, covering both business transformation and staff training. Wong said companies that succeed under the programme would set standards for their industries and push others to follow.

Firms can also benefit from an expansion of the Enterprise Innovation Scheme, which already gives businesses a 400% tax deduction on qualifying costs. AI spending will now count under the scheme, though there is a cap of SG$50,000 (about $39,654) per year for 2027 and 2028.

On the worker side, Wong said every Singaporean can take steps to learn AI skills. The government will redesign its SkillsFuture website to make it easier for people to find AI courses that match their job needs and skill level. SkillsFuture gives Singaporeans credits to sign up for courses starting at age 25. Wong also acknowledged that while basic AI tools are free, more advanced features often come with a price tag. To help with that, people who complete selected AI training courses will get six months of free access to premium AI tools. “This will allow them to practice, experiment, and apply what they have learnt,” he said.

Boosting the stock market

On the financial markets side, the government announced it would add SG$1.5 billion (about $1.18 billion) to the Financial Sector Development Fund. Set up in 1999, the fund hands out grants to build Singapore up as a global financial centre.

The new injection follows a SG$5 billion Equity Market Development Programme announced in 2025. That programme has helped the Straits Times Index climb 22.67% last year, its best annual performance since 2009. Of the original SG$5 billion, SG$4 billion has already been placed with nine asset managers, with the rest due to follow in the second quarter of 2026.

The government also plans to make it easier for fast-growing companies to list on the stock exchange and to set up a dual-listing link between the Singapore Exchange and Nasdaq.

“These measures will enhance the depth and vibrancy of our public equities market and provide more pathways for enterprises to grow and scale from Singapore,” Wong said.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.
Ethereum (ETH) Struggles Near $2,100 Resistance: Crypto Whales Shift FocusThe crypto market is entering a period of reassessment as major assets struggle to regain momentum. Ethereum remains a core pillar of the ecosystem, but recent price action has raised new questions among large investors. With ETH facing strong resistance and slower upside potential, crypto whales are beginning to look elsewhere. Their focus is shifting toward lower priced tokens that combine utility, early stage growth, and visible technical progress. This rotation does not signal the end of Ethereum’s relevance. Instead, it reflects how capital behaves when large networks mature and opportunities with higher upside emerge. Ethereum (ETH) Ethereum is currently trading near $2,000, a zone that has acted as a key resistance level in recent months. Its market capitalization remains above $240 billion, making it the second largest cryptocurrency in the market. Ethereum continues to power a wide range of decentralized applications, stablecoins, and on chain activity. However, this scale also creates limitations. With such a high valuation, even strong inflows result in smaller percentage gains. For ETH to double in price, hundreds of billions in new capital would be required. Many investors now see Ethereum as a long term infrastructure hold rather than a high growth play. This is why whales are increasingly exploring lower cost tokens that offer more room for expansion. Mutuum Finance (MUTM) Mutuum Finance (MUTM) is a decentralized lending and borrowing protocol designed to support structured on chain finance. The platform is built around a dual market system that serves different user needs. The Peer to Contract P2C model uses pooled liquidity. Users supply funds and receive mtTokens, which track earned yield over time. APY is variable and depends on demand. For example, if a pool offers 6% APY, supplying $10,000 could generate about $600 over a year, assuming usage remains stable. The Peer to Peer P2P market, still under development, is intended to allow users to set custom borrow rates and loan types directly. Borrowing is over collateralized, with loan to value ratios typically around 70%, depending on the market. Risk is managed through automated liquidations that trigger if collateral value drops below required thresholds. Security and Community Activity Mutuum Finance is currently in Phase 7 of its token distribution. The MUTM token is priced at $0.04, below the confirmed $0.06 launch price. The presale has followed a structured path, with gradual price increases tied to development milestones. Security has been a major focus. The protocol has completed a Halborn audit, adding an extra layer of confidence around its smart contract design. Ongoing testing and monitoring are part of the development process. To keep engagement high, the project runs a 24 hour leaderboard that rewards active community participation. This approach helps build consistent activity rather than short bursts of attention driven by price alone. V1 Protocol Launch and Stablecoin Plans A major catalyst for growing interest is the V1 protocol launch on the Sepolia testnet, confirmed through official updates. This release allows users to interact with liquidity pools, mint mtTokens, and observe debt tracking and automated liquidation systems in a live test environment. Looking ahead, the team has outlined plans to introduce a native stablecoin in a later phase. This feature is intended to allow users to mint a stable unit against collateral without selling their holdings, once development and testing are complete. Phase 7 of the token distribution is progressing quickly, reflecting sustained demand as technical milestones are reached. For many whales, this combination of early stage pricing, active testing, and clear roadmap goals explains why attention is shifting away from large cap assets like Ethereum and toward emerging protocols with higher upside potential. Ethereum’s growth profile has changed. As ETH struggles near key resistance, whales are increasingly positioning in projects that resemble Ethereum’s early build phase rather than its current scale. Mutuum Finance is gaining attention because it offers structured lending, visible technical progress, and early stage positioning. This is why it is becoming part of the broader capital rotation taking shape in the market today. For more information about Mutuum Finance (MUTM) visit the links below: Website: https://www.mutuum.com Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mutuumfinance

Ethereum (ETH) Struggles Near $2,100 Resistance: Crypto Whales Shift Focus

The crypto market is entering a period of reassessment as major assets struggle to regain momentum. Ethereum remains a core pillar of the ecosystem, but recent price action has raised new questions among large investors. With ETH facing strong resistance and slower upside potential, crypto whales are beginning to look elsewhere. Their focus is shifting toward lower priced tokens that combine utility, early stage growth, and visible technical progress. This rotation does not signal the end of Ethereum’s relevance. Instead, it reflects how capital behaves when large networks mature and opportunities with higher upside emerge.

Ethereum (ETH)

Ethereum is currently trading near $2,000, a zone that has acted as a key resistance level in recent months. Its market capitalization remains above $240 billion, making it the second largest cryptocurrency in the market. Ethereum continues to power a wide range of decentralized applications, stablecoins, and on chain activity.

However, this scale also creates limitations. With such a high valuation, even strong inflows result in smaller percentage gains. For ETH to double in price, hundreds of billions in new capital would be required. Many investors now see Ethereum as a long term infrastructure hold rather than a high growth play. This is why whales are increasingly exploring lower cost tokens that offer more room for expansion.

Mutuum Finance (MUTM)

Mutuum Finance (MUTM) is a decentralized lending and borrowing protocol designed to support structured on chain finance. The platform is built around a dual market system that serves different user needs.

The Peer to Contract P2C model uses pooled liquidity. Users supply funds and receive mtTokens, which track earned yield over time. APY is variable and depends on demand. For example, if a pool offers 6% APY, supplying $10,000 could generate about $600 over a year, assuming usage remains stable.

The Peer to Peer P2P market, still under development, is intended to allow users to set custom borrow rates and loan types directly. Borrowing is over collateralized, with loan to value ratios typically around 70%, depending on the market. Risk is managed through automated liquidations that trigger if collateral value drops below required thresholds.

Security and Community Activity

Mutuum Finance is currently in Phase 7 of its token distribution. The MUTM token is priced at $0.04, below the confirmed $0.06 launch price. The presale has followed a structured path, with gradual price increases tied to development milestones.

Security has been a major focus. The protocol has completed a Halborn audit, adding an extra layer of confidence around its smart contract design. Ongoing testing and monitoring are part of the development process.

To keep engagement high, the project runs a 24 hour leaderboard that rewards active community participation. This approach helps build consistent activity rather than short bursts of attention driven by price alone.

V1 Protocol Launch and Stablecoin Plans

A major catalyst for growing interest is the V1 protocol launch on the Sepolia testnet, confirmed through official updates. This release allows users to interact with liquidity pools, mint mtTokens, and observe debt tracking and automated liquidation systems in a live test environment.

Looking ahead, the team has outlined plans to introduce a native stablecoin in a later phase. This feature is intended to allow users to mint a stable unit against collateral without selling their holdings, once development and testing are complete.

Phase 7 of the token distribution is progressing quickly, reflecting sustained demand as technical milestones are reached. For many whales, this combination of early stage pricing, active testing, and clear roadmap goals explains why attention is shifting away from large cap assets like Ethereum and toward emerging protocols with higher upside potential.

Ethereum’s growth profile has changed. As ETH struggles near key resistance, whales are increasingly positioning in projects that resemble Ethereum’s early build phase rather than its current scale. Mutuum Finance is gaining attention because it offers structured lending, visible technical progress, and early stage positioning. This is why it is becoming part of the broader capital rotation taking shape in the market today.

For more information about Mutuum Finance (MUTM) visit the links below:

Website: https://www.mutuum.com
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mutuumfinance
Ripple joins Fed discussion on Reserve Bank Payment Account pilot (Docket OP-1877)Ripple has officially participated in the United States Federal Reserve’s public discussion process regarding the Reserve Bank Payment Account pilot proposal under Docket OP-1877.  The fintech company is engaging in a conversation that could lead to non-bank financial institutions accessing central bank accounts without depending on intermediary commercial banks.  Under OP-1877, the Fed governors stated, “Any institution that is legally eligible for Federal Reserve accounts or services (accounts and services) under the Federal Reserve Act would be eligible to request a Payment Account from a Reserve Bank. The Payment Account prototype does not seek to expand or otherwise change legal eligibility for access to accounts and services.” Ripple says model aligns with transparency and financial stability goals The initiative is currently in its exploratory stage. The docket OP-1877 concerns whether the Fed should provide specialized accounts to specific non-bank institutions. Ripple based its response on enhancing the safety, efficiency, and resiliency of the US payment system. 🚨 JUST IN: #Ripple Engages Fed Consultation on OP-1877 Payment Account Pilot. pic.twitter.com/egOHTZKu1g — RippleXity (@RippleXity) February 12, 2026 “As a leader in enterprise blockchain, stablecoin and cross-border payment solutions, Ripple is committed to the safety, efficiency and modernization of the US payment system,” the company wrote. Ripple noted that changing account structures will likely reflect the increasing significance of real-time digital finance.  Ripple stated that this model is consistent with regulatory objectives of transparency and financial stability. According to market analysts, for the RLUSD stablecoins, the initiative can minimize counterparty risk with the commercial bank. It can make the settlement process more reliable during periods of stress.  This follows a robust growth as RLUSD. As reported by Cryptopolitan, the stablecoin reached a supply of $1.2 billion after 14 months of launch. This represents approximately a 10× year-over-year increase and reflects the stablecoin’s rapid traction. The $1.2 billion milestone marks a 20% increase since RLUSD reached a supply of over $1 billion on the ETH blockchain in November. It hit this milestone just a few days after hitting $900 million in October of last year. On-chain data showed that the supply of Ethereum’s RLUSD rose by 2.40% over the last seven days and by 11.54% over the last month. The supply of XRPL increased by 4.50% over the past month, driven by continued issuance and adoption across both networks. RLUSD’s market capitalization is $1.52 billion, up 9.85% over the previous 30 days. There are 41,277 active holdings, including 3,206 active addresses, and a 30-day trading volume of $3.2 billion.  Meanwhile, Cryptopolitan has reported that Binance has finalized the integration of Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin on the XRP Ledger network and is preparing withdrawals once liquidity conditions are met. In its public statement, Binance confirmed that the integration enables users to transfer RLUSD directly through the Ripple-made blockchain network.  Overall, Ethereum led the stablecoin ecosystem, accounting for $163.6 billion of the total market capitalization. TRON came in second with $83.7 billion, Solana with $16.3 billion, BNB Chain with $12.7 billion, and Arbitrum with $7.7 billion. XRP struggles below key resistance levels Data from SosoValue shows that XRP ETFs recorded zero daily net inflows during their last trading session. This follows single-day inflows of $3.26 million on Feb. 11 and $6.31 million on Feb. 10.  This silent movement of XRP funds reflects a pause in investor activity, possibly out of caution, even as market watchers pointed to potential recovery signals in XRP’s price. Meanwhile, Ripple’s native coin has already broken support levels and failed to hold major resistance. Now, it is attempting a comeback after a 2% surge in the past 24 hours, as volume is also up almost 20%  The main short-term support area sits between $1.34 and $1.28. Analysts expect high volatility inside this zone due to thin liquidity. If the market stabilizes in this range, XRP could find temporary support and attempt a recovery. However, the level may not hold if broader financial markets weaken. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Ripple joins Fed discussion on Reserve Bank Payment Account pilot (Docket OP-1877)

Ripple has officially participated in the United States Federal Reserve’s public discussion process regarding the Reserve Bank Payment Account pilot proposal under Docket OP-1877. 

The fintech company is engaging in a conversation that could lead to non-bank financial institutions accessing central bank accounts without depending on intermediary commercial banks. 

Under OP-1877, the Fed governors stated, “Any institution that is legally eligible for Federal Reserve accounts or services (accounts and services) under the Federal Reserve Act would be eligible to request a Payment Account from a Reserve Bank. The Payment Account prototype does not seek to expand or otherwise change legal eligibility for access to accounts and services.”

Ripple says model aligns with transparency and financial stability goals

The initiative is currently in its exploratory stage. The docket OP-1877 concerns whether the Fed should provide specialized accounts to specific non-bank institutions. Ripple based its response on enhancing the safety, efficiency, and resiliency of the US payment system.

🚨 JUST IN: #Ripple Engages Fed Consultation on OP-1877 Payment Account Pilot. pic.twitter.com/egOHTZKu1g

— RippleXity (@RippleXity) February 12, 2026

“As a leader in enterprise blockchain, stablecoin and cross-border payment solutions, Ripple is committed to the safety, efficiency and modernization of the US payment system,” the company wrote. Ripple noted that changing account structures will likely reflect the increasing significance of real-time digital finance. 

Ripple stated that this model is consistent with regulatory objectives of transparency and financial stability. According to market analysts, for the RLUSD stablecoins, the initiative can minimize counterparty risk with the commercial bank. It can make the settlement process more reliable during periods of stress. 

This follows a robust growth as RLUSD. As reported by Cryptopolitan, the stablecoin reached a supply of $1.2 billion after 14 months of launch. This represents approximately a 10× year-over-year increase and reflects the stablecoin’s rapid traction.

The $1.2 billion milestone marks a 20% increase since RLUSD reached a supply of over $1 billion on the ETH blockchain in November. It hit this milestone just a few days after hitting $900 million in October of last year.

On-chain data showed that the supply of Ethereum’s RLUSD rose by 2.40% over the last seven days and by 11.54% over the last month. The supply of XRPL increased by 4.50% over the past month, driven by continued issuance and adoption across both networks.

RLUSD’s market capitalization is $1.52 billion, up 9.85% over the previous 30 days. There are 41,277 active holdings, including 3,206 active addresses, and a 30-day trading volume of $3.2 billion. 

Meanwhile, Cryptopolitan has reported that Binance has finalized the integration of Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin on the XRP Ledger network and is preparing withdrawals once liquidity conditions are met. In its public statement, Binance confirmed that the integration enables users to transfer RLUSD directly through the Ripple-made blockchain network. 

Overall, Ethereum led the stablecoin ecosystem, accounting for $163.6 billion of the total market capitalization. TRON came in second with $83.7 billion, Solana with $16.3 billion, BNB Chain with $12.7 billion, and Arbitrum with $7.7 billion.

XRP struggles below key resistance levels

Data from SosoValue shows that XRP ETFs recorded zero daily net inflows during their last trading session. This follows single-day inflows of $3.26 million on Feb. 11 and $6.31 million on Feb. 10. 

This silent movement of XRP funds reflects a pause in investor activity, possibly out of caution, even as market watchers pointed to potential recovery signals in XRP’s price.

Meanwhile, Ripple’s native coin has already broken support levels and failed to hold major resistance. Now, it is attempting a comeback after a 2% surge in the past 24 hours, as volume is also up almost 20% 

The main short-term support area sits between $1.34 and $1.28. Analysts expect high volatility inside this zone due to thin liquidity. If the market stabilizes in this range, XRP could find temporary support and attempt a recovery. However, the level may not hold if broader financial markets weaken.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.
David Schwartz calls Bitcoin a “dead end” technologicallyFear has taken hold of the cryptocurrency market. Bitcoin is sitting near $67,000, well below where it stood late last year, and a closely watched sentiment tracker is flashing some of its most alarming readings on record. The Crypto Fear and Greed Index, which pulls together data from trading volumes, price swings, social media activity, market momentum, and Bitcoin’s share of the overall crypto market, has dropped to somewhere between 5 and 8 in recent days. Numbers that low are rare. The last time readings were this bleak was during some of the worst crashes the crypto market has ever seen. A crypto veteran calls Bitcoin a dead end While ordinary investors are running scared, a well-known figure in the blockchain world has added fuel to the fire with some sharp words about Bitcoin’s future. David Schwartz, who served as chief technology officer at Ripple and co-designed the XRP Ledger, said he has no interest in contributing to Bitcoin’s development. His reason? He thinks Bitcoin is basically a dead end from a technology standpoint. He drew a comparison to the regular US dollar, arguing that Bitcoin stays on top not because the people behind it are constantly improving the technology, but because people trust they’ll be able to hold onto it and move it around whenever they want. “For 99% of what makes Bitcoin interesting, all the blockchain needs to be able to do is allow people to rely on being able to hold and transfer Bitcoin in the future,” Schwartz wrote in posts on X. Source: @JoelKatz He did leave some room for the idea that change might eventually be unavoidable. One scenario he pointed to was quantum computing. If Bitcoin doesn’t update its code to defend against that kind of threat, a process that would require a hard fork, meaning a significant and divisive change to the network, it could be in serious trouble. “I guess that will be at least one case where technological changes will be necessary, or Bitcoin will collapse,” he said. Schwartz’s comments land in familiar territory for anyone who has followed Bitcoin criticism over the years. Many skeptics have long argued that Bitcoin’s staying power comes from its brand, the size of its network, and speculative interest, not from any real technical progress. Coming from someone who built a rival system with a focus on speed and practical use, his words carry a certain weight. JPMorgan sees a steadier road ahead However, not everyone is gloomy. Over at JPMorgan, strategists are taking a more upbeat view of where crypto is headed for the rest of 2026 and beyond. A team led by analyst Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou put out a report stating that they expect money to start flowing back into digital assets. The difference this time around, they say, is that the push will come from big institutions rather than regular retail investors or companies building up Bitcoin reserves. That kind of money tends to be more steady, which could make for a less chaotic cycle than what markets have seen before. The JPMorgan team also highlighted something worth watching on the mining side. It now costs roughly $77,000 to produce one Bitcoin. Since the price is currently sitting below that level, the most expensive miners are under real pressure. If enough of them shut down, the network becomes easier to mine, costs drop, and the market finds a new floor, a kind of built-in correction that Bitcoin has gone through before. The analysts also noted that Bitcoin is holding its ground reasonably well compared to gold, even though gold has been outperforming lately. On the regulatory front, potential legislation like the Clarity Act could open the door for more institutional money to come in, which JPMorgan sees as a meaningful boost. So Bitcoin finds itself in a strange place right now. A respected technology builder says it has nowhere left to grow. Meanwhile, one of the biggest banks in the world says the sell-off may not last. The market sits somewhere in between, waiting to see which side turns out to be right. Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

David Schwartz calls Bitcoin a “dead end” technologically

Fear has taken hold of the cryptocurrency market. Bitcoin is sitting near $67,000, well below where it stood late last year, and a closely watched sentiment tracker is flashing some of its most alarming readings on record.

The Crypto Fear and Greed Index, which pulls together data from trading volumes, price swings, social media activity, market momentum, and Bitcoin’s share of the overall crypto market, has dropped to somewhere between 5 and 8 in recent days. Numbers that low are rare.

The last time readings were this bleak was during some of the worst crashes the crypto market has ever seen.

A crypto veteran calls Bitcoin a dead end

While ordinary investors are running scared, a well-known figure in the blockchain world has added fuel to the fire with some sharp words about Bitcoin’s future.

David Schwartz, who served as chief technology officer at Ripple and co-designed the XRP Ledger, said he has no interest in contributing to Bitcoin’s development. His reason? He thinks Bitcoin is basically a dead end from a technology standpoint.

He drew a comparison to the regular US dollar, arguing that Bitcoin stays on top not because the people behind it are constantly improving the technology, but because people trust they’ll be able to hold onto it and move it around whenever they want.

“For 99% of what makes Bitcoin interesting, all the blockchain needs to be able to do is allow people to rely on being able to hold and transfer Bitcoin in the future,” Schwartz wrote in posts on X.

Source: @JoelKatz

He did leave some room for the idea that change might eventually be unavoidable. One scenario he pointed to was quantum computing. If Bitcoin doesn’t update its code to defend against that kind of threat, a process that would require a hard fork, meaning a significant and divisive change to the network, it could be in serious trouble.

“I guess that will be at least one case where technological changes will be necessary, or Bitcoin will collapse,” he said.

Schwartz’s comments land in familiar territory for anyone who has followed Bitcoin criticism over the years. Many skeptics have long argued that Bitcoin’s staying power comes from its brand, the size of its network, and speculative interest, not from any real technical progress. Coming from someone who built a rival system with a focus on speed and practical use, his words carry a certain weight.

JPMorgan sees a steadier road ahead

However, not everyone is gloomy. Over at JPMorgan, strategists are taking a more upbeat view of where crypto is headed for the rest of 2026 and beyond. A team led by analyst Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou put out a report stating that they expect money to start flowing back into digital assets.

The difference this time around, they say, is that the push will come from big institutions rather than regular retail investors or companies building up Bitcoin reserves. That kind of money tends to be more steady, which could make for a less chaotic cycle than what markets have seen before.

The JPMorgan team also highlighted something worth watching on the mining side. It now costs roughly $77,000 to produce one Bitcoin. Since the price is currently sitting below that level, the most expensive miners are under real pressure. If enough of them shut down, the network becomes easier to mine, costs drop, and the market finds a new floor, a kind of built-in correction that Bitcoin has gone through before.

The analysts also noted that Bitcoin is holding its ground reasonably well compared to gold, even though gold has been outperforming lately. On the regulatory front, potential legislation like the Clarity Act could open the door for more institutional money to come in, which JPMorgan sees as a meaningful boost.

So Bitcoin finds itself in a strange place right now. A respected technology builder says it has nowhere left to grow. Meanwhile, one of the biggest banks in the world says the sell-off may not last. The market sits somewhere in between, waiting to see which side turns out to be right.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.
Anthropic commits $20M to midterm races to defend state-level AI lawsThe battle between artificial intelligence companies has jumped from the tech world straight into American politics. Anthropic announced Thursday it will pour $20 million into races this midterm election season. The money goes to Public First Action, a newly formed group that wants states to keep their power to write AI rules. That puts Anthropic on a collision course with both OpenAI’s political operation and the Trump White House, which wants Washington to take control of AI policy nationwide. “The companies building AI have a responsibility to help ensure the technology serves the public good, not just their own interests,” Anthropic said in Thursday’s announcement. The group is backing candidates who oppose efforts to strip states of their authority over AI technology. One early beneficiary is Marsha Blackburn, the Republican running for Tennessee governor, who fought against federal bills that would have blocked state legislatures from passing their own AI laws. Public First Action faces steep odds against Leading the Future, the opposing group backed by OpenAI president Greg Brockman and tech investor Marc Andreessen. That operation has collected $125 million since launching in August 2025. Andreessen’s venture firm A16Z holds a stake in OpenAI, making the funding fight even more personal between the rival AI developers. Trump’s December executive order escalates the battle President Trump signed an order in December that directly threatens the state laws Anthropic wants to protect. The directive tells federal agencies to build a national AI framework with minimal rules, then use it to override tougher state regulations. Trump’s order goes further by creating a Justice Department task force specifically designed to challenge state AI laws in court. States with rules Trump considers too strict could lose federal funding. His AI advisor, David Sacks, already singled out Colorado’s law as “probably the most excessive” one on the books. Several states have regulations taking effect or moving through legislatures in 2026. Colorado delayed its AI Act until June 30, 2026, after facing pressure, but the law will still require companies building “high-risk” AI systems to prevent discrimination in their algorithms. California passed seven AI laws in 2025, with its Transparency in Frontier AI Act starting January 1, 2026. Texas banned AI use for certain purposes through its Responsible AI Governance Act. Cryptopolitan previously reported that Anthropic raised $2 billion at a $60 billion valuation last year, followed by a massive $15 billion investment from Microsoft and Nvidia that pushed its worth to around $350 billion. Those investors now have billions riding on how AI gets regulated. Deep ideological split drives spending war The company’s blog post Thursday took a veiled shot at OpenAI without naming them directly, warning that “vast resources have flowed to political organizations that oppose” efforts to make AI safer.  If candidates backed by Public First Action win enough seats, they could block federal preemption bills in Congress. That would keep the state-by-state approach alive, at least temporarily. The rivalry between Anthropic and OpenAI runs much deeper than just funding levels. Founded by siblings Dario and Daniela Amodei after they left OpenAI over safety concerns, Anthropic has built its entire identity around making AI technology less risky. OpenAI and its backers prefer lighter rules that let innovation move faster. That philosophical gap now plays out in campaign contributions and lobbying. OpenAI asked Trump to block state AI rules in exchange for government access to its models earlier this year. The company argued that fragmented state laws would damage America’s AI leadership. But the odds look tough. Leading the Future’s six-to-one funding advantage gives OpenAI’s side more money to spend on ads, staff, and ground operations. Trump’s executive order also hands federal agencies tools to challenge state laws immediately, without waiting for Congress. The fight reveals a deeper split in Silicon Valley over how much oversight AI should face. Companies like Anthropic, founded by former OpenAI employees who left over safety disagreements, generally favor stronger rules to prevent AI from causing harm. OpenAI and its supporters prefer lighter regulation that lets innovation move faster. Voters in states that passed AI laws will essentially get to choose which vision they prefer when they cast ballots this fall. Their decision could determine whether AI development happens under a patchwork of state rules or a uniform federal system with fewer restrictions. Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Anthropic commits $20M to midterm races to defend state-level AI laws

The battle between artificial intelligence companies has jumped from the tech world straight into American politics. Anthropic announced Thursday it will pour $20 million into races this midterm election season.

The money goes to Public First Action, a newly formed group that wants states to keep their power to write AI rules. That puts Anthropic on a collision course with both OpenAI’s political operation and the Trump White House, which wants Washington to take control of AI policy nationwide.

“The companies building AI have a responsibility to help ensure the technology serves the public good, not just their own interests,” Anthropic said in Thursday’s announcement.

The group is backing candidates who oppose efforts to strip states of their authority over AI technology. One early beneficiary is Marsha Blackburn, the Republican running for Tennessee governor, who fought against federal bills that would have blocked state legislatures from passing their own AI laws.

Public First Action faces steep odds against Leading the Future, the opposing group backed by OpenAI president Greg Brockman and tech investor Marc Andreessen. That operation has collected $125 million since launching in August 2025. Andreessen’s venture firm A16Z holds a stake in OpenAI, making the funding fight even more personal between the rival AI developers.

Trump’s December executive order escalates the battle

President Trump signed an order in December that directly threatens the state laws Anthropic wants to protect. The directive tells federal agencies to build a national AI framework with minimal rules, then use it to override tougher state regulations.

Trump’s order goes further by creating a Justice Department task force specifically designed to challenge state AI laws in court. States with rules Trump considers too strict could lose federal funding. His AI advisor, David Sacks, already singled out Colorado’s law as “probably the most excessive” one on the books.

Several states have regulations taking effect or moving through legislatures in 2026. Colorado delayed its AI Act until June 30, 2026, after facing pressure, but the law will still require companies building “high-risk” AI systems to prevent discrimination in their algorithms. California passed seven AI laws in 2025, with its Transparency in Frontier AI Act starting January 1, 2026. Texas banned AI use for certain purposes through its Responsible AI Governance Act.

Cryptopolitan previously reported that Anthropic raised $2 billion at a $60 billion valuation last year, followed by a massive $15 billion investment from Microsoft and Nvidia that pushed its worth to around $350 billion. Those investors now have billions riding on how AI gets regulated.

Deep ideological split drives spending war

The company’s blog post Thursday took a veiled shot at OpenAI without naming them directly, warning that “vast resources have flowed to political organizations that oppose” efforts to make AI safer.

 If candidates backed by Public First Action win enough seats, they could block federal preemption bills in Congress. That would keep the state-by-state approach alive, at least temporarily.

The rivalry between Anthropic and OpenAI runs much deeper than just funding levels. Founded by siblings Dario and Daniela Amodei after they left OpenAI over safety concerns, Anthropic has built its entire identity around making AI technology less risky. OpenAI and its backers prefer lighter rules that let innovation move faster.

That philosophical gap now plays out in campaign contributions and lobbying. OpenAI asked Trump to block state AI rules in exchange for government access to its models earlier this year. The company argued that fragmented state laws would damage America’s AI leadership.

But the odds look tough. Leading the Future’s six-to-one funding advantage gives OpenAI’s side more money to spend on ads, staff, and ground operations. Trump’s executive order also hands federal agencies tools to challenge state laws immediately, without waiting for Congress.

The fight reveals a deeper split in Silicon Valley over how much oversight AI should face. Companies like Anthropic, founded by former OpenAI employees who left over safety disagreements, generally favor stronger rules to prevent AI from causing harm. OpenAI and its supporters prefer lighter regulation that lets innovation move faster.

Voters in states that passed AI laws will essentially get to choose which vision they prefer when they cast ballots this fall. Their decision could determine whether AI development happens under a patchwork of state rules or a uniform federal system with fewer restrictions.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.
Binance Coin Price Forecast: Where Is BNB Headed As XRP Flips It And Which Token Is The Best Cryp...The market order has changed. XRP has taken the fourth spot, bumping Binance Coin to the fifth spot despite both being in the red. Binance Coin has shed 6.28% in the last 24 hours and has fallen to $588 as traders debate what to do next. However, for investors wondering what cryptocurrency to invest in today, the question is not what will happen to Binance Coin.  The question is whether holding exchange-based tokens or settlement coins is even relevant in an era in which there are clear protocols for earning passive income. There is a cryptocurrency out there with functioning infrastructure, a limited supply, and passive income opportunities that Binance Coin and XRP do not provide. BNB Drops Lower XRP has taken the spot from Binance Coin, but this does not mean anything has changed on the fundamental side. XRP is currently trading at $1.36 and has shed 33% in one month. Despite Goldman Sachs holding $152 million in XRP ETFs, there is no income generated by XRP holders. All XRP does is settle transactions. It does not multiply the value of holders. The same goes for Binance Coin. While the value of Binance Coin is tied to trading volume on Binance and to the burning of Binance Coin, burning does not provide income to holders. There are no dividends earned on transactions processed on the exchange, and there is only speculation about the timing of the burn. As such, neither XRP nor Binance Coin qualifies as the best cryptocurrency to invest in today. What Mutuum Finance Actually Builds Mutuum Finance (MUTM) is a decentralized, non-custodial lending platform in which users earn income on their holdings without selling them. Mutuum Finance has two different markets: peer-to-contract (P2C) and peer-to-peer (P2P).  Peer-to-Contract lending features pools where different suppliers’ liquidity is combined. When a user adds $8,000 in USDC, they will be rewarded with mtUSDC, which will automatically start earning interest. At an achievable 10% APY, this could increase to a total of $8,800 in one year without the user’s involvement. Peer-to-peer is a type of market where users can set their own loan terms. A user who wants to borrow $4,000 ETH for a short time could be able to do so, negotiating a 12% APY and SHIB collateral. Presale Supply and 21x Opening Window The fixed supply mechanism is what differentiates Mutuum Finance from other DeFi tokens, which have inflationary systems. The total supply is capped at 4 billion, with 45.5% allocated for the presale. This is a fixed amount, with over 850 million absorbed by over 19,000 holders, raising a total of $20,500,000. The price for Phase 7 is set at $0.04, while Phase 8, which is set to be released soon, will be priced at $0.045. The public launch will be activated when the entire presale is sold out, and the price will be fixed at $0.06. However, according to analysts who have created a model for what will happen when the platform is launched, it is likely that the price will immediately rise 21x. This is due to the fixed supply versus growing demand and adoption, listings, and the other growth drivers like the protocol’s buyback-and-distribute mechanism. If the demand from stakers and new users is as predicted, it is likely that the price will be adjusted to $0.84 within a short time of its launch. Earning While Holding: Dividends and Daily Rewards Unlike BNB, which simply reduces float by burning, Mutuum actually transfers value to participants. The buy and distribute mechanism utilizes a portion of the borrowing fees from the protocol to buy MUTM on the open market. These MUTM tokens are then transferred to users who stake their mtTokens with the safety module. Take the example of a user who lends $12,000 of ETH to a liquidity pool. The user receives mtETH, which they decide to stake. What if the fees from the protocol reach $600,000 per month, with $90,000 of this being used for the buyback and redistribution? The staker could get up to an extra $1,200, separate from their yield on the lending. Why Infrastructure Beats Sentiment BNB is waiting for a volume boost while XRP is waiting for a lawsuit to spark nostalgia. Mutuum Finance on the other hand, has an audited lending platform with real fees to transfer to their token holders. For investors looking to determine what is the best crypto to buy, it’s not about which one has the top market capitalization. It’s about which one actually produces value. For more information about Mutuum Finance (MUTM) visit the links below: Website: https://mutuum.com/  Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mutuumfinance

Binance Coin Price Forecast: Where Is BNB Headed As XRP Flips It And Which Token Is The Best Cryp...

The market order has changed. XRP has taken the fourth spot, bumping Binance Coin to the fifth spot despite both being in the red. Binance Coin has shed 6.28% in the last 24 hours and has fallen to $588 as traders debate what to do next. However, for investors wondering what cryptocurrency to invest in today, the question is not what will happen to Binance Coin. 

The question is whether holding exchange-based tokens or settlement coins is even relevant in an era in which there are clear protocols for earning passive income. There is a cryptocurrency out there with functioning infrastructure, a limited supply, and passive income opportunities that Binance Coin and XRP do not provide.

BNB Drops Lower

XRP has taken the spot from Binance Coin, but this does not mean anything has changed on the fundamental side. XRP is currently trading at $1.36 and has shed 33% in one month. Despite Goldman Sachs holding $152 million in XRP ETFs, there is no income generated by XRP holders. All XRP does is settle transactions. It does not multiply the value of holders.

The same goes for Binance Coin. While the value of Binance Coin is tied to trading volume on Binance and to the burning of Binance Coin, burning does not provide income to holders. There are no dividends earned on transactions processed on the exchange, and there is only speculation about the timing of the burn. As such, neither XRP nor Binance Coin qualifies as the best cryptocurrency to invest in today.

What Mutuum Finance Actually Builds

Mutuum Finance (MUTM) is a decentralized, non-custodial lending platform in which users earn income on their holdings without selling them. Mutuum Finance has two different markets: peer-to-contract (P2C) and peer-to-peer (P2P). 

Peer-to-Contract lending features pools where different suppliers’ liquidity is combined. When a user adds $8,000 in USDC, they will be rewarded with mtUSDC, which will automatically start earning interest. At an achievable 10% APY, this could increase to a total of $8,800 in one year without the user’s involvement. Peer-to-peer is a type of market where users can set their own loan terms. A user who wants to borrow $4,000 ETH for a short time could be able to do so, negotiating a 12% APY and SHIB collateral.

Presale Supply and 21x Opening Window

The fixed supply mechanism is what differentiates Mutuum Finance from other DeFi tokens, which have inflationary systems. The total supply is capped at 4 billion, with 45.5% allocated for the presale. This is a fixed amount, with over 850 million absorbed by over 19,000 holders, raising a total of $20,500,000.

The price for Phase 7 is set at $0.04, while Phase 8, which is set to be released soon, will be priced at $0.045. The public launch will be activated when the entire presale is sold out, and the price will be fixed at $0.06. However, according to analysts who have created a model for what will happen when the platform is launched, it is likely that the price will immediately rise 21x. This is due to the fixed supply versus growing demand and adoption, listings, and the other growth drivers like the protocol’s buyback-and-distribute mechanism. If the demand from stakers and new users is as predicted, it is likely that the price will be adjusted to $0.84 within a short time of its launch.

Earning While Holding: Dividends and Daily Rewards

Unlike BNB, which simply reduces float by burning, Mutuum actually transfers value to participants. The buy and distribute mechanism utilizes a portion of the borrowing fees from the protocol to buy MUTM on the open market. These MUTM tokens are then transferred to users who stake their mtTokens with the safety module.

Take the example of a user who lends $12,000 of ETH to a liquidity pool. The user receives mtETH, which they decide to stake. What if the fees from the protocol reach $600,000 per month, with $90,000 of this being used for the buyback and redistribution? The staker could get up to an extra $1,200, separate from their yield on the lending.

Why Infrastructure Beats Sentiment

BNB is waiting for a volume boost while XRP is waiting for a lawsuit to spark nostalgia. Mutuum Finance on the other hand, has an audited lending platform with real fees to transfer to their token holders. For investors looking to determine what is the best crypto to buy, it’s not about which one has the top market capitalization. It’s about which one actually produces value.

For more information about Mutuum Finance (MUTM) visit the links below:

Website: https://mutuum.com/ 
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mutuumfinance
Move Over Ripple (XRP), This New Crypto Coin Will Deliver the Biggest Profits of 2026 While Ripple (XRP) continues to face difficulties in maintaining its growth, one new crypto coin is gaining the attention of investors. This new coin, Mutuum Finance (MUTM), has already shown impressive growth, with a highly-subscribed presale that has raised over $20.48 million sooner than expected. XRP Under Pressure Amid Global Risk-Off Sentiment XRP’s price has fallen from $2.00 to $1.40, driven by various factors in the global market. The latest decision by China to sell US Treasury bonds has caused a risk-off sentiment in the market, affecting the liquidity of various assets, including XRP. XRP’s RSI indicator is currently below 50, and the price is currently trading below the 50-day moving average. While XRP struggles with momentum, Mutuum Finance has gained attention as investors look for better opportunities in the market. MUTM Price Prediction: Could the Token Reach $1? From its presale start, MUTM has managed to raise more than $20.48 million and has recorded more than 19,000 token holders. The current price is $0.04 in Phase 7, having increased by 4x since its opening presale price. When it finally reaches $1, as analyst predictions state, it would be a 25x price appreciation from its current price. The price appreciation is not only based on strong presale demand, but also on its underlying protocol and upcoming exchange listings. The capped supply, presale structure, and increased engagement make MUTM an interesting investment opportunity for those searching for a top crypto to buy now. Multichain Expansion: Unlocking Liquidity Across Networks One of the strategies employed by Mutuum Finance is its multichain expansion, which will help unlock liquidity across multiple networks instead of having it confined to a single network.  For example, its deployment will start on Ethereum, where it could achieve $10 million in supplied liquidity and $5 million in borrowed liquidity. That results in a 50% utilization ratio, which could result in a 6% APY. When deployed to two more networks, liquidity could increase to $20 million and $15 million in borrowed liquidity, bringing its utilization ratio 75%. This would allow lenders to earn a higher APY e.g, 10%, making multichain expansion beneficial to both lenders and the protocol. Peer-to-Peer Lending: Flexible Solutions for Speculative Assets Mutuum Finance’s Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Lending offers specific and personalized loan opportunities. P2P is particularly useful for tokens that are volatile or cannot participate in a market pool. For example, if an investor has $12,000 in SHIB tokens but needs cash for other uses, the investor can find a peer who is willing to lend $6,000 USDC. The investor would then lock up the SHIB tokens as collateral at 200% overcollateralization. The loan would be received at an agreed interest rate, for instance, 12%. While Ripple continues to face challenges, investors are now looking to a new crypto coin, Mutuum Finance. While only recently launched, MUTM has taken over the DeFi scene with strong momentum. Investors can accumulate the token during phase 7 of its presale at $0.04, with higher prices scheduled in the upcoming phases. Phase 8 alone will see MUTM cost nearly 20% more. Investors can benefit from a live DeFi lending platform, liquidity expansion through multiple chains, and peer-to-peer lending for customized volatile assets. With its presale already exceeding $20.48 million and 19,000 investors, MUTM is projected to accelerate toward $1 upon launch, making it one of the best cryptos to buy now. For more information about Mutuum Finance (MUTM) visit the links below: Website: https://mutuum.com/  Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mutuumfinance 

Move Over Ripple (XRP), This New Crypto Coin Will Deliver the Biggest Profits of 2026 

While Ripple (XRP) continues to face difficulties in maintaining its growth, one new crypto coin is gaining the attention of investors. This new coin, Mutuum Finance (MUTM), has already shown impressive growth, with a highly-subscribed presale that has raised over $20.48 million sooner than expected.

XRP Under Pressure Amid Global Risk-Off Sentiment

XRP’s price has fallen from $2.00 to $1.40, driven by various factors in the global market. The latest decision by China to sell US Treasury bonds has caused a risk-off sentiment in the market, affecting the liquidity of various assets, including XRP. XRP’s RSI indicator is currently below 50, and the price is currently trading below the 50-day moving average. While XRP struggles with momentum, Mutuum Finance has gained attention as investors look for better opportunities in the market.

MUTM Price Prediction: Could the Token Reach $1?

From its presale start, MUTM has managed to raise more than $20.48 million and has recorded more than 19,000 token holders. The current price is $0.04 in Phase 7, having increased by 4x since its opening presale price. When it finally reaches $1, as analyst predictions state, it would be a 25x price appreciation from its current price. The price appreciation is not only based on strong presale demand, but also on its underlying protocol and upcoming exchange listings. The capped supply, presale structure, and increased engagement make MUTM an interesting investment opportunity for those searching for a top crypto to buy now.

Multichain Expansion: Unlocking Liquidity Across Networks

One of the strategies employed by Mutuum Finance is its multichain expansion, which will help unlock liquidity across multiple networks instead of having it confined to a single network. 

For example, its deployment will start on Ethereum, where it could achieve $10 million in supplied liquidity and $5 million in borrowed liquidity. That results in a 50% utilization ratio, which could result in a 6% APY. When deployed to two more networks, liquidity could increase to $20 million and $15 million in borrowed liquidity, bringing its utilization ratio 75%. This would allow lenders to earn a higher APY e.g, 10%, making multichain expansion beneficial to both lenders and the protocol.

Peer-to-Peer Lending: Flexible Solutions for Speculative Assets

Mutuum Finance’s Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Lending offers specific and personalized loan opportunities. P2P is particularly useful for tokens that are volatile or cannot participate in a market pool. For example, if an investor has $12,000 in SHIB tokens but needs cash for other uses, the investor can find a peer who is willing to lend $6,000 USDC. The investor would then lock up the SHIB tokens as collateral at 200% overcollateralization. The loan would be received at an agreed interest rate, for instance, 12%.

While Ripple continues to face challenges, investors are now looking to a new crypto coin, Mutuum Finance. While only recently launched, MUTM has taken over the DeFi scene with strong momentum. Investors can accumulate the token during phase 7 of its presale at $0.04, with higher prices scheduled in the upcoming phases. Phase 8 alone will see MUTM cost nearly 20% more. Investors can benefit from a live DeFi lending platform, liquidity expansion through multiple chains, and peer-to-peer lending for customized volatile assets. With its presale already exceeding $20.48 million and 19,000 investors, MUTM is projected to accelerate toward $1 upon launch, making it one of the best cryptos to buy now.

For more information about Mutuum Finance (MUTM) visit the links below:

Website: https://mutuum.com/ 

Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mutuumfinance 
Deutsche Bank kept Epstein as a client after publicly cutting tiesDeutsche Bank, Germany’s largest bank, managed a large part of Jeffrey Epstein’s assets through 40 accounts. This revelation came with consequences. The bank’s stock fell by 5.49% on February 4 after additional Epstein files detailing his criminal activities were made public.  Epstein was a sex offender. He was in custody awaiting trial for further charges when he died in August 2019 with a net worth of nearly $600 million. According to DOJ documents, Deutsche took him on as a client in 2013 after JPMorgan decided to close his long-held accounts for reputational reasons. Therefore, the bank knew exactly whom it was getting involved with.  Paul Morris was reportedly part of the JPMorgan team that managed Epstein’s money before introducing the financier as a client to Deutsche Bank. Morris was the primary officer for a number of Epstein accounts at Deutsche Bank, including Southern Financial, which was reportedly one of the financier’s main sources of income. Deutsche Bank kept Epstein as a client after publicly cutting ties Deutsche Bank has been particularly criticized for failing to react when Epstein withdrew large sums of cash from his account. Analysts have highlighted certain transaction details in the Epstein files that now seem problematic, considering the financier’s dubious business activities. The bank served him for 5 years before telling him that it would end the relationship in late 2018. However, it continued offering services even after closing all its accounts after his arrest in July 2019. For instance, it arranged an order made on April 9, 2019, for 50,000 euros ($59,300) in cash in “large bills” ahead of a trip to Europe Also, on January 3, 2019, Epstein’s office asked how much he could take out daily with his Deutsche debit card. The bank’s answer was $12,000 a day. Deutsche continued to operate one Epstein account, called Southern Trust Company, with more than $30 million moving in and out in March 2019.  In April 2019, an Epstein account at Deutsche made more than $100,000 in transfers to various aviation firms. Deutsche also arranged another $7,500 in euros to be sent in cash by FedEx to an Epstein aide in New York, as well as the 50,000 euros on short notice. Both requests were made in a single email on April 9.  Epstein still held at least nine accounts with balances totalling $1,776,680 with Germany’s largest bank as of May 3, 2019. The files show it took news of his arrest on July 6, 2019, almost seven months later, for Deutsche to make a final clean break with Epstein by officially closing the accounts. Deutsche Bank has already been forced to pay out money in this case. The US Federal Reserve imposed a fine of more than $180 million after it was found to have not fixed problems with its money-laundering controls fast enough. It was also ordered to pay $75 million as part of a settlement to a group of Epstein’s victims.  This week, the German news agency dpa quoted a company spokesperson as saying: “As repeatedly emphasized since 2020, the bank acknowledges its mistake in accepting Jeffrey Epstein as a client in 2013.” Financial institutions and their execs found in the Epstein files Chief legal officer and general counsel at Goldman Sachs, Kathy Ruemmler, appeared in several emails with Epstein and his associates from 2014 to 2019. Various emails suggest Ruemmler often visited Epstein for lunch, that he showered her with gifts, and sometimes paid for hair appointments. Jes Staley, who resigned as CEO of Barclays in 2021 following an investigation by the Financial Conduct Authority into his links with Epstein, also had very close connections with the convicted sex offender. “I deeply appreciate our friendship. I have few so profound,” Staley wrote to Epstein in 2009 when he was working at JPMorgan. Between 2008 and 2012, Staley exchanged around 1,200 emails with the disgraced financier while at the US bank. Additionally, Cecilia Steen, an employee within JPMorgan’s London office, is a longtime associate of Jeffrey Epstein. She messaged the convicted sex offender to pledge her loyalty just days before he died. “My dearest Jeffrey, I don’t know when you’ll get to read this. I was so sad to read that you had been found unconscious [sic] in your cell. No matter what happens, I will always be loyal to you, and you will always be in my heart,” she wrote. Paul Barrett, an employee at JPMorgan, served Epstein after JPMorgan dropped him. As reported by Cryptopolitan, he continued to engage with him privately and later left JPM to be Epstein’s manager. “I left a great career at JPM to work with you […] We made a lot of money working together over the years…” Barrett wrote to Epstein. Also, a spokesperson for Edmond de Rothschild told The Banker that de Rothschild was a business acquaintance of Epstein between 2013 and 2019. Epstein was paid $25 million to carry out strategic advisory assignments and support the bank’s overall business development. Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Deutsche Bank kept Epstein as a client after publicly cutting ties

Deutsche Bank, Germany’s largest bank, managed a large part of Jeffrey Epstein’s assets through 40 accounts. This revelation came with consequences. The bank’s stock fell by 5.49% on February 4 after additional Epstein files detailing his criminal activities were made public. 

Epstein was a sex offender. He was in custody awaiting trial for further charges when he died in August 2019 with a net worth of nearly $600 million. According to DOJ documents, Deutsche took him on as a client in 2013 after JPMorgan decided to close his long-held accounts for reputational reasons. Therefore, the bank knew exactly whom it was getting involved with. 

Paul Morris was reportedly part of the JPMorgan team that managed Epstein’s money before introducing the financier as a client to Deutsche Bank. Morris was the primary officer for a number of Epstein accounts at Deutsche Bank, including Southern Financial, which was reportedly one of the financier’s main sources of income.

Deutsche Bank kept Epstein as a client after publicly cutting ties

Deutsche Bank has been particularly criticized for failing to react when Epstein withdrew large sums of cash from his account. Analysts have highlighted certain transaction details in the Epstein files that now seem problematic, considering the financier’s dubious business activities.

The bank served him for 5 years before telling him that it would end the relationship in late 2018. However, it continued offering services even after closing all its accounts after his arrest in July 2019. For instance, it arranged an order made on April 9, 2019, for 50,000 euros ($59,300) in cash in “large bills” ahead of a trip to Europe

Also, on January 3, 2019, Epstein’s office asked how much he could take out daily with his Deutsche debit card. The bank’s answer was $12,000 a day. Deutsche continued to operate one Epstein account, called Southern Trust Company, with more than $30 million moving in and out in March 2019. 

In April 2019, an Epstein account at Deutsche made more than $100,000 in transfers to various aviation firms. Deutsche also arranged another $7,500 in euros to be sent in cash by FedEx to an Epstein aide in New York, as well as the 50,000 euros on short notice. Both requests were made in a single email on April 9. 

Epstein still held at least nine accounts with balances totalling $1,776,680 with Germany’s largest bank as of May 3, 2019. The files show it took news of his arrest on July 6, 2019, almost seven months later, for Deutsche to make a final clean break with Epstein by officially closing the accounts.

Deutsche Bank has already been forced to pay out money in this case. The US Federal Reserve imposed a fine of more than $180 million after it was found to have not fixed problems with its money-laundering controls fast enough. It was also ordered to pay $75 million as part of a settlement to a group of Epstein’s victims. 

This week, the German news agency dpa quoted a company spokesperson as saying: “As repeatedly emphasized since 2020, the bank acknowledges its mistake in accepting Jeffrey Epstein as a client in 2013.”

Financial institutions and their execs found in the Epstein files

Chief legal officer and general counsel at Goldman Sachs, Kathy Ruemmler, appeared in several emails with Epstein and his associates from 2014 to 2019. Various emails suggest Ruemmler often visited Epstein for lunch, that he showered her with gifts, and sometimes paid for hair appointments.

Jes Staley, who resigned as CEO of Barclays in 2021 following an investigation by the Financial Conduct Authority into his links with Epstein, also had very close connections with the convicted sex offender.

“I deeply appreciate our friendship. I have few so profound,” Staley wrote to Epstein in 2009 when he was working at JPMorgan. Between 2008 and 2012, Staley exchanged around 1,200 emails with the disgraced financier while at the US bank.

Additionally, Cecilia Steen, an employee within JPMorgan’s London office, is a longtime associate of Jeffrey Epstein. She messaged the convicted sex offender to pledge her loyalty just days before he died.

“My dearest Jeffrey, I don’t know when you’ll get to read this. I was so sad to read that you had been found unconscious [sic] in your cell. No matter what happens, I will always be loyal to you, and you will always be in my heart,” she wrote.

Paul Barrett, an employee at JPMorgan, served Epstein after JPMorgan dropped him. As reported by Cryptopolitan, he continued to engage with him privately and later left JPM to be Epstein’s manager. “I left a great career at JPM to work with you […] We made a lot of money working together over the years…” Barrett wrote to Epstein.

Also, a spokesperson for Edmond de Rothschild told The Banker that de Rothschild was a business acquaintance of Epstein between 2013 and 2019. Epstein was paid $25 million to carry out strategic advisory assignments and support the bank’s overall business development.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.
Why is China cracking down on car price wars now?After years of price wars destabilizing the Chinese automobile industry, the government is finally stepping in to regulate prices and protect both manufacturers and consumers.  China’s market regulator has released 28 new rules that target extreme price competition and encourage companies to make their platforms safer for consumers by flagging suspicious or unclear listings.  Why is China cracking down on car price wars now? The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) in China has issued a new set of rules called the “Guideline for Compliance with Price Behavior in the Automobile Industry” in order to protect both consumers and businesses from the destructive price wars that have hurt the Chinese car market for the past few years.  The new guideline contains five chapters and 28 articles and covers everything from how car manufacturers set their prices to how local dealerships advertise to customers. The guideline firstly sets rules for manufacturers, requiring them to manage prices through the entire production process.  Second, it targets sales companies for “non-clear price marking” and false advertisements. Third, it encourages online platforms to set up risk prompts for very low prices that might be misleading or dangerous to the market.  Finally, it instructs car companies to build internal compliance systems containing six specific mechanisms, including price decision-making, contract management, internal supervision, emergency response, risk control, and staff training. According to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM), the Chinese automobile industry’s price war caused an estimated loss of 471 billion yuan ($65 billion) in industry output value over the last three years. Industry data shows that 173 car models saw official price cuts in the first 11 months of 2025 alone. The industry’s pre-tax profit margin fell to just 4.3% or 4.4% in late 2025, the second-lowest level on record for the sector.  Regulators are now worried that companies will stop investing in new technology or safety if profit margins remain so low. Passenger car sales in China experienced the biggest percentage drop in nearly two years, dropping by 19.5% in January 2026 compared to the previous year.  The government is now trying to encourage buyers to return to the market with the confidence that prices have stabilized. The government also extended a program that gives subsidies to people who trade in old cars for new ones. But, the 2026 version of the program gives a percentage of the car’s price rather than a fixed amount.  How will these new price rules affect the global EV market? The EU recently agreed to exempt the Cupra Tavascan, an electric SUV designed in Spain but made in China, from a 20.7% import tariff. In exchange, Volkswagen agreed to a minimum price floor and a sales quota, meaning the car cannot be sold in Europe below a certain price.  An EU investigation showed that this “price undertaking” would prevent Chinese subsidies from hurting European car makers. He Yadong, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), reversed the country’s previous stance and said that China now supports its EV makers reaching “minimum price” agreements with the EU.  China’s Ministry of Commerce is encouraging other Chinese brands like BYD and Nio to also agree to minimum prices so Chinese companies can avoid the high tariffs that were first introduced in 2024. Those tariffs ranged from 7.8% for Tesla to over 35% for SAIC.  Under the EU’s new guidance issued in January 2026, companies that agree to minimum prices are also encouraged to invest in manufacturing plants within the European Union. This helps the EU reach its climate goals and protects local jobs. Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program

Why is China cracking down on car price wars now?

After years of price wars destabilizing the Chinese automobile industry, the government is finally stepping in to regulate prices and protect both manufacturers and consumers. 

China’s market regulator has released 28 new rules that target extreme price competition and encourage companies to make their platforms safer for consumers by flagging suspicious or unclear listings. 

Why is China cracking down on car price wars now?

The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) in China has issued a new set of rules called the “Guideline for Compliance with Price Behavior in the Automobile Industry” in order to protect both consumers and businesses from the destructive price wars that have hurt the Chinese car market for the past few years. 

The new guideline contains five chapters and 28 articles and covers everything from how car manufacturers set their prices to how local dealerships advertise to customers. The guideline firstly sets rules for manufacturers, requiring them to manage prices through the entire production process. 

Second, it targets sales companies for “non-clear price marking” and false advertisements. Third, it encourages online platforms to set up risk prompts for very low prices that might be misleading or dangerous to the market. 

Finally, it instructs car companies to build internal compliance systems containing six specific mechanisms, including price decision-making, contract management, internal supervision, emergency response, risk control, and staff training.

According to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM), the Chinese automobile industry’s price war caused an estimated loss of 471 billion yuan ($65 billion) in industry output value over the last three years.

Industry data shows that 173 car models saw official price cuts in the first 11 months of 2025 alone. The industry’s pre-tax profit margin fell to just 4.3% or 4.4% in late 2025, the second-lowest level on record for the sector. 

Regulators are now worried that companies will stop investing in new technology or safety if profit margins remain so low.

Passenger car sales in China experienced the biggest percentage drop in nearly two years, dropping by 19.5% in January 2026 compared to the previous year. 

The government is now trying to encourage buyers to return to the market with the confidence that prices have stabilized. The government also extended a program that gives subsidies to people who trade in old cars for new ones. But, the 2026 version of the program gives a percentage of the car’s price rather than a fixed amount. 

How will these new price rules affect the global EV market?

The EU recently agreed to exempt the Cupra Tavascan, an electric SUV designed in Spain but made in China, from a 20.7% import tariff. In exchange, Volkswagen agreed to a minimum price floor and a sales quota, meaning the car cannot be sold in Europe below a certain price. 

An EU investigation showed that this “price undertaking” would prevent Chinese subsidies from hurting European car makers.

He Yadong, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), reversed the country’s previous stance and said that China now supports its EV makers reaching “minimum price” agreements with the EU. 

China’s Ministry of Commerce is encouraging other Chinese brands like BYD and Nio to also agree to minimum prices so Chinese companies can avoid the high tariffs that were first introduced in 2024. Those tariffs ranged from 7.8% for Tesla to over 35% for SAIC. 

Under the EU’s new guidance issued in January 2026, companies that agree to minimum prices are also encouraged to invest in manufacturing plants within the European Union. This helps the EU reach its climate goals and protects local jobs.

Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program
Lending protocols top DeFi hack targets with 67 historical exploitsLending protocols are some of the most active DeFi apps. Due to the heavy usage of smart contracts, they are also the most at risk for hacks and exploits.  Lending protocols logged the biggest number of exploits among DeFi attacks. Historically, lending protocols suffered 67 attacks in total, out of 267 DeFi incidents reported by Sentora.  Lending protocols are attractive for exploiters for several reasons. They contain well-funded vaults with stablecoins or valuable collateral, often in the form of ETH or BTC. Additionally, most of the on-chain lending is permissionless and relies on smart contracts.  The other main reason is the possibility of flash loans, which are in themselves an exploit, causing market losses. Protocols also faced risks from oracles and pricing, as well as the triggering of liquidations. Lending protocols also sometimes use new tokens to pay interest, leading to minting exploits.  Technical error is the main reason for losses from lending protocols Overall, most large protocols aim to increase their security and audit their smart contracts. The chief source of losses for the past 12 months ended January 2026 shows a dominance of technical issues.  Smart contract bugs were the root cause of the majority of incidents. The second most notable cause was compromised private keys or multisig wallets. In total, smart contracts led to $526M losses across 48 incidents in the past year.  Lending protocols hold $53B in reported value locked, and may remain a target for exploits. The attacks target smaller protocols and sometimes, specific vaults. As Cryptopolitan reported, projects like Moonwell were exploited through flaws in oracles and pricing data.  Price manipulation incidents were also a key type of exploit, with a total of 13 incidents in the past year and $65M in losses.  Even audited protocols were at risk, losing a total of $515M. Out-of-scope exploits lost $193M, while unaudited contracts leaked another $77M in 24 incidents. Historically, among the top 30 hacks, unaudited code is the main reason in 58.4% of cases. Most projects go through audits, but this does not protect them from all risks, as on-chain apps have multiple sources of input and interaction. Most of the attacks against DeFi rely on careful tracking and deep knowledge of their smart contracts. The other vector of stealing funds is directed at end users. While DeFi is permissionless, new cloned DEXs are appearing. Some pretend to be decentralized, but hold user deposits and require additional fees to withdraw.    Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Lending protocols top DeFi hack targets with 67 historical exploits

Lending protocols are some of the most active DeFi apps. Due to the heavy usage of smart contracts, they are also the most at risk for hacks and exploits. 

Lending protocols logged the biggest number of exploits among DeFi attacks. Historically, lending protocols suffered 67 attacks in total, out of 267 DeFi incidents reported by Sentora. 

Lending protocols are attractive for exploiters for several reasons. They contain well-funded vaults with stablecoins or valuable collateral, often in the form of ETH or BTC. Additionally, most of the on-chain lending is permissionless and relies on smart contracts. 

The other main reason is the possibility of flash loans, which are in themselves an exploit, causing market losses. Protocols also faced risks from oracles and pricing, as well as the triggering of liquidations.

Lending protocols also sometimes use new tokens to pay interest, leading to minting exploits. 

Technical error is the main reason for losses from lending protocols

Overall, most large protocols aim to increase their security and audit their smart contracts. The chief source of losses for the past 12 months ended January 2026 shows a dominance of technical issues. 

Smart contract bugs were the root cause of the majority of incidents. The second most notable cause was compromised private keys or multisig wallets. In total, smart contracts led to $526M losses across 48 incidents in the past year. 

Lending protocols hold $53B in reported value locked, and may remain a target for exploits. The attacks target smaller protocols and sometimes, specific vaults. As Cryptopolitan reported, projects like Moonwell were exploited through flaws in oracles and pricing data. 

Price manipulation incidents were also a key type of exploit, with a total of 13 incidents in the past year and $65M in losses. 

Even audited protocols were at risk, losing a total of $515M. Out-of-scope exploits lost $193M, while unaudited contracts leaked another $77M in 24 incidents. Historically, among the top 30 hacks, unaudited code is the main reason in 58.4% of cases. Most projects go through audits, but this does not protect them from all risks, as on-chain apps have multiple sources of input and interaction.

Most of the attacks against DeFi rely on careful tracking and deep knowledge of their smart contracts. The other vector of stealing funds is directed at end users. While DeFi is permissionless, new cloned DEXs are appearing. Some pretend to be decentralized, but hold user deposits and require additional fees to withdraw. 

 

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.
Pudgy Penguins jumps 10% after Visa and KAST partnershipPudgy Penguins has surged nearly 10% in the past 2 hours after the firm integrated with Visa and KAST on Thursday to launch the Pengu Card. At the time of publication, Pudgy Penguins is trading at $0.006403, up 8.8% in the past 24 hours. Pudgy Penguins has dropped 9% in the last 7 days and more than 46.5% in the last 30 days prior to the partnership announcement. The firm’s initiative shows that it’s expanding beyond the cryptocurrency sector into retail traditional finance. Pengu Card offers up to 12% rewards Today, Pengu enters the world of consumer finance. Introducing the Pengu Card on @Visa, in collaboration with @KASTxyz. Sign up for the waitlist below to secure your very own Pengu Card. pic.twitter.com/Kdj5lNmMOw — Pudgy Penguins (@pudgypenguins) February 11, 2026 Pudgy Penguins said on Wednesday that users can access the Pengu Card in advance via a waitlist. The Visa Debit Card will be accepted globally, targeting more than 150 million merchants. The firm revealed that the card will offer users up to 12% rewards and up to 7% yield. The card will also enable users to directly pay with stablecoins or cryptocurrencies. Pengu Penguins said the initiative aims to enable seamless circulation of virtual assets in daily financial activities. The financial firm released the card in three tiers: Standard Card, Black Card, and Gold Card. Pengu Penguins revealed that the Standard Card offers 6%, while the Premium and Gold Cards offer up to 8% and 12%, respectively. Pengu Penguins added that it will offer users on the waitlist a unique referral code to invite friends to participate. Users will also receive a Black Card once they get a higher ranking on the leaderboard. The waitlist will open a few weeks before the virtual card launch. The firm will also offer the top 10 referrers on the waitlist leaderboard a free Premium Pengu Card. The referral program will rank users by total successful referrals, with the final leaderboard confirmed before launch. KAST also revealed that users will require a verified KAST account to receive and use the Pengu Card. The Pengu card will be accepted in more than 170 countries where Visa is accepted.  Pengu Penguins said it will first launch the card as a virtual card, enabling users to use it online with digital wallets. The firm confirmed that it will release a physical card later and will offer waitlist members early updates on the release. Pengu Penguins and KAST have also arranged a party in Hong Kong to celebrate the project, with the firm promising attendees an early access code and exclusive merch.  Pudgy Penguins hosts a three-day Valentine’s pop-up event The firm is also planning to host the Pudgy Petals for Valentine’s Day pop-up event, signifying its efforts to build cultural relevance. The firm said the three-day event in New York City will feature major retailers and integrate with physical products in the Pudgy World metaverse. Pudgy Penguins will offer the Pudgy Penguins Plush Bouquet ($49.99), featuring plush characters and soft textures as an alternative to traditional flowers. “The Plushie Bouquet marked our first Valentine’s Day expression. The item is intentionally positioned as a long-lasting symbol of companionship designed to be kept and revisited rather than disregarded after a few days like traditional flowers or candy.” -Steve Starobinsky, Director of Business Development at Pudgy Penguins. Starobinsky also revealed that the firm is aiming to expand the pop-up event globally in 2027. Pudgy Penguins began as an internet-native phenomenon and NFT project after Canary Capital filed for an S-1 form with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in March 2025 to list a fund tracking PENGU. Cryptopolitan previously reported that the SEC has extended its review of a Pengu ETF proposal filed by Grayscale and T. Rowe Price. The ETFs will be the first funds to include both the PENGU token and Pudgy Penguins NFTs once approved. The firm also revealed that the ETF will hold Solana and Ethereum to allow the sale and purchase of the included assets. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Pudgy Penguins jumps 10% after Visa and KAST partnership

Pudgy Penguins has surged nearly 10% in the past 2 hours after the firm integrated with Visa and KAST on Thursday to launch the Pengu Card. At the time of publication, Pudgy Penguins is trading at $0.006403, up 8.8% in the past 24 hours.

Pudgy Penguins has dropped 9% in the last 7 days and more than 46.5% in the last 30 days prior to the partnership announcement. The firm’s initiative shows that it’s expanding beyond the cryptocurrency sector into retail traditional finance.

Pengu Card offers up to 12% rewards

Today, Pengu enters the world of consumer finance.

Introducing the Pengu Card on @Visa, in collaboration with @KASTxyz.

Sign up for the waitlist below to secure your very own Pengu Card. pic.twitter.com/Kdj5lNmMOw

— Pudgy Penguins (@pudgypenguins) February 11, 2026

Pudgy Penguins said on Wednesday that users can access the Pengu Card in advance via a waitlist. The Visa Debit Card will be accepted globally, targeting more than 150 million merchants.

The firm revealed that the card will offer users up to 12% rewards and up to 7% yield. The card will also enable users to directly pay with stablecoins or cryptocurrencies. Pengu Penguins said the initiative aims to enable seamless circulation of virtual assets in daily financial activities.

The financial firm released the card in three tiers: Standard Card, Black Card, and Gold Card. Pengu Penguins revealed that the Standard Card offers 6%, while the Premium and Gold Cards offer up to 8% and 12%, respectively.

Pengu Penguins added that it will offer users on the waitlist a unique referral code to invite friends to participate. Users will also receive a Black Card once they get a higher ranking on the leaderboard. The waitlist will open a few weeks before the virtual card launch.

The firm will also offer the top 10 referrers on the waitlist leaderboard a free Premium Pengu Card. The referral program will rank users by total successful referrals, with the final leaderboard confirmed before launch.

KAST also revealed that users will require a verified KAST account to receive and use the Pengu Card. The Pengu card will be accepted in more than 170 countries where Visa is accepted. 

Pengu Penguins said it will first launch the card as a virtual card, enabling users to use it online with digital wallets. The firm confirmed that it will release a physical card later and will offer waitlist members early updates on the release. Pengu Penguins and KAST have also arranged a party in Hong Kong to celebrate the project, with the firm promising attendees an early access code and exclusive merch. 

Pudgy Penguins hosts a three-day Valentine’s pop-up event

The firm is also planning to host the Pudgy Petals for Valentine’s Day pop-up event, signifying its efforts to build cultural relevance. The firm said the three-day event in New York City will feature major retailers and integrate with physical products in the Pudgy World metaverse. Pudgy Penguins will offer the Pudgy Penguins Plush Bouquet ($49.99), featuring plush characters and soft textures as an alternative to traditional flowers.

“The Plushie Bouquet marked our first Valentine’s Day expression. The item is intentionally positioned as a long-lasting symbol of companionship designed to be kept and revisited rather than disregarded after a few days like traditional flowers or candy.”

-Steve Starobinsky, Director of Business Development at Pudgy Penguins.

Starobinsky also revealed that the firm is aiming to expand the pop-up event globally in 2027. Pudgy Penguins began as an internet-native phenomenon and NFT project after Canary Capital filed for an S-1 form with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in March 2025 to list a fund tracking PENGU.

Cryptopolitan previously reported that the SEC has extended its review of a Pengu ETF proposal filed by Grayscale and T. Rowe Price. The ETFs will be the first funds to include both the PENGU token and Pudgy Penguins NFTs once approved. The firm also revealed that the ETF will hold Solana and Ethereum to allow the sale and purchase of the included assets.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.
Solana outperforms Web3 and Web2 platforms in payment volume with 755% growth yearSolana network has experienced explosive growth in payment volume, outpacing both Web3 and Web2 platforms. The network’s payment volume grew 755% year on year, according to Artemis data. The Solana network is currently leading all payment platforms across Web2 and Web3 in total payment volume. According to data from onchain data provider Artemis, Solana’s payment processing volume grew 755% year over year across all platforms, with total payment volume exceeding $1.8 billion. Solana Network’s B2B payment volume rises by 9X in 16 months, onchain data shows Solana leads payments growth across all platforms, at +755% YoY. While blockchains are winning growth (+755% on $6.5B), TradFi still owns volume (PayPal processes $1.8T). https://t.co/9bW2qfzIlA pic.twitter.com/k0BlKxdckJ — Artemis (@artemis) February 11, 2026 In comparison, Artemis data showed that stablecoin payment volume increased by over 137% year over year as of August 2025, with B2B accounting for the largest share across all stablecoins. The data also shows that Solana’s B2B payment volume grew by 9X to $3.84 billion in just 16 months. Solana Network has also witnessed massive growth in spot trading volume. A previous report by Cryptopolitan, dated January 5, highlighted that the network recorded $1.6 trillion in spot trading volume in 2025, outpacing major crypto exchanges. Solana’s trading volume accounted for 11.92% of the global spot market according to onchain data. The network’s spot volume ranked it only behind Binance, which led the pack with $7.2 trillion. According to onchain data, Solana outperformed major crypto exchanges such as Bybit, Coinbase, and Bitget in 2025.  Data from the open-source DeFi data aggregator DefiLlama shows that SOL’s monthly volume on decentralized exchanges outperformed major rivals such as Ethereum and BSC in most of 2025, peaking in January 2025 at $313.91 billion. In the same month, Ethereum followed in second place with a total trading volume of $85.692 billion, while Base ranked third with $50 billion. Solana ended the year with total trading volume exceeding $1.5 trillion, while Ethereum clocked $950 billion. SOL price dips, sending treasury firms tumbling However, SOL has had a rough start to the year amid the ongoing crypto winter. The crypto asset is down 9% over the last 7 days, according to CoinMarketCap data. SOL has declined by more than 35% year to date and is trading at $82.38 at the time of this publication. The price decline has had a devastating impact on SOL treasury firms. Cryptopolitan recently reported that Solana treasury firms have seen their holdings decline after SOL fell nearly 40% over the last 30 days. According to data from Coingecko, Forward Industries currently ranks first with 6.9 million Solana in its books, valued at $564.38 million. In comparison, Solana Company claims the second spot with 2.3 million SOL, valued at $187.8 million. The report noted that SOL’s price mirrored the massive liquidations that occurred on Friday, wiping out more than $300 million in long positions.  Spot SOL ETFs have recorded net outflows of more than $10 million so far in February. Data from Sosovalue shows that these funds recorded inflows worth $478.90k on Wednesday after drawing $8.43 million from investors the previous day. The funds currently hold $673.99 million in net assets under management, which accounts for 1.49% of the crypto asset’s total market capitalization. Solana’s daily validator count has fallen to its lowest level since 2021, below 800. The figures mark a significant decline from the network’s peak validator count of 2,500 recorded in early 2023. The decline in validator count could be a deliberate effort by the Solana Foundation, according to a previous Cryptopolitan coverage. The report noted that the foundation implemented a deliberate behind-the-scenes restructuring to reshape validator conditions and requirements. The pruning phase led the Solana Foundation to offload many underperforming nodes amid efforts to improve the network’s quality and reliability. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Solana outperforms Web3 and Web2 platforms in payment volume with 755% growth year

Solana network has experienced explosive growth in payment volume, outpacing both Web3 and Web2 platforms. The network’s payment volume grew 755% year on year, according to Artemis data.

The Solana network is currently leading all payment platforms across Web2 and Web3 in total payment volume. According to data from onchain data provider Artemis, Solana’s payment processing volume grew 755% year over year across all platforms, with total payment volume exceeding $1.8 billion.

Solana Network’s B2B payment volume rises by 9X in 16 months, onchain data shows

Solana leads payments growth across all platforms, at +755% YoY.

While blockchains are winning growth (+755% on $6.5B), TradFi still owns volume (PayPal processes $1.8T). https://t.co/9bW2qfzIlA pic.twitter.com/k0BlKxdckJ

— Artemis (@artemis) February 11, 2026

In comparison, Artemis data showed that stablecoin payment volume increased by over 137% year over year as of August 2025, with B2B accounting for the largest share across all stablecoins. The data also shows that Solana’s B2B payment volume grew by 9X to $3.84 billion in just 16 months.

Solana Network has also witnessed massive growth in spot trading volume. A previous report by Cryptopolitan, dated January 5, highlighted that the network recorded $1.6 trillion in spot trading volume in 2025, outpacing major crypto exchanges.

Solana’s trading volume accounted for 11.92% of the global spot market according to onchain data. The network’s spot volume ranked it only behind Binance, which led the pack with $7.2 trillion. According to onchain data, Solana outperformed major crypto exchanges such as Bybit, Coinbase, and Bitget in 2025. 

Data from the open-source DeFi data aggregator DefiLlama shows that SOL’s monthly volume on decentralized exchanges outperformed major rivals such as Ethereum and BSC in most of 2025, peaking in January 2025 at $313.91 billion.

In the same month, Ethereum followed in second place with a total trading volume of $85.692 billion, while Base ranked third with $50 billion. Solana ended the year with total trading volume exceeding $1.5 trillion, while Ethereum clocked $950 billion.

SOL price dips, sending treasury firms tumbling

However, SOL has had a rough start to the year amid the ongoing crypto winter. The crypto asset is down 9% over the last 7 days, according to CoinMarketCap data. SOL has declined by more than 35% year to date and is trading at $82.38 at the time of this publication.

The price decline has had a devastating impact on SOL treasury firms. Cryptopolitan recently reported that Solana treasury firms have seen their holdings decline after SOL fell nearly 40% over the last 30 days.

According to data from Coingecko, Forward Industries currently ranks first with 6.9 million Solana in its books, valued at $564.38 million. In comparison, Solana Company claims the second spot with 2.3 million SOL, valued at $187.8 million. The report noted that SOL’s price mirrored the massive liquidations that occurred on Friday, wiping out more than $300 million in long positions. 

Spot SOL ETFs have recorded net outflows of more than $10 million so far in February. Data from Sosovalue shows that these funds recorded inflows worth $478.90k on Wednesday after drawing $8.43 million from investors the previous day. The funds currently hold $673.99 million in net assets under management, which accounts for 1.49% of the crypto asset’s total market capitalization.

Solana’s daily validator count has fallen to its lowest level since 2021, below 800. The figures mark a significant decline from the network’s peak validator count of 2,500 recorded in early 2023. The decline in validator count could be a deliberate effort by the Solana Foundation, according to a previous Cryptopolitan coverage.

The report noted that the foundation implemented a deliberate behind-the-scenes restructuring to reshape validator conditions and requirements. The pruning phase led the Solana Foundation to offload many underperforming nodes amid efforts to improve the network’s quality and reliability.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.
Spot crypto trading on crypto exchanges see 10% boost in JanuarySpot crypto trading on centralized and decentralized exchanges expanded in January. Binance was once again the leading market, boosting the growth to 10% compared to December 2025.  Spot crypto trading on centralized exchanges remains active, even after the drawdown of leveraged liquidity. On average, activity expanded by 10% in January, compared with December 2025. The top growth was noted on Uniswap, up by 84%. Bitfinex added 70% to its volumes, and Upbit expanded its activity by 44%.  The biggest outflows happened on HTX, down 19%, and Bybit, down 16%. KuCoin lost 7% of its January volume.  Derivative crypto trading slowed down in January The crypto market still has sufficient liquidity, though concentrated into BTC and ETH, as Cryptopolitan reported. The crypto space has a record supply of stablecoins capable of ensuring active spot trading.  Derivative activity has lost its momentum, meaning exchanges operate with lower leverage. In January 2026, derivatives trading volumes declined by 5% on average. MEXC led the decline, down 36%, followed by Aster (down 24%).  Coinbase showed an increase of 49% for derivatives, while Hyperliquid recovered 19% of its volumes.  Binance remained the top spot and derivative exchange, up by 12.5% for spot trading activity. However, Binance only saw a 0.7% increase for its derivative trading, reflecting the cautious market sentiment. Trading data may be inaccurate by including bot-driven orders and wash trading.  Web traffic to exchanges remained mostly unchanged, though South Korean markets like Upbit and KuCoin saw increased visits. MEXC continued to slow down, losing 8% of its site visits.  Traders searched for short-term resolution Crypto trading in January saw an uptick in volumes, while most assets took a downturn. For some DEXs and markets, activity reached peak levels, as traders divested their positions.  A part of the volume expansion was due to selling, as well as some spot accumulation. Without a clear directional move and greed sentiment, the current spot-driven market may mean a period of sideways trading for major assets.  DEXs retained a relatively high share of 16.9% of centralized activity. Those markets were also more widely used by retail and for meme token trading. Centralized market orders also diminished in size.  The size of spot orders declined in January, while smaller whales and retail reappeared in February. | Source: Cryptoquant In the past weeks, retail orders returned, alongside orders from smaller whales. Larger whales continued with silent accumulation, but did not add to active daily trading volumes. While the market moves sideways, smaller wallets were noticed buying back BTC, as well as ETH, while whales continued to sell. Crypto trades with peak uncertainty and higher volatility, as questions were raised on whether BTC could go lower in an extended bear market. Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Spot crypto trading on crypto exchanges see 10% boost in January

Spot crypto trading on centralized and decentralized exchanges expanded in January. Binance was once again the leading market, boosting the growth to 10% compared to December 2025. 

Spot crypto trading on centralized exchanges remains active, even after the drawdown of leveraged liquidity. On average, activity expanded by 10% in January, compared with December 2025.

The top growth was noted on Uniswap, up by 84%. Bitfinex added 70% to its volumes, and Upbit expanded its activity by 44%. 

The biggest outflows happened on HTX, down 19%, and Bybit, down 16%. KuCoin lost 7% of its January volume. 

Derivative crypto trading slowed down in January

The crypto market still has sufficient liquidity, though concentrated into BTC and ETH, as Cryptopolitan reported. The crypto space has a record supply of stablecoins capable of ensuring active spot trading. 

Derivative activity has lost its momentum, meaning exchanges operate with lower leverage. In January 2026, derivatives trading volumes declined by 5% on average. MEXC led the decline, down 36%, followed by Aster (down 24%). 

Coinbase showed an increase of 49% for derivatives, while Hyperliquid recovered 19% of its volumes. 

Binance remained the top spot and derivative exchange, up by 12.5% for spot trading activity. However, Binance only saw a 0.7% increase for its derivative trading, reflecting the cautious market sentiment. Trading data may be inaccurate by including bot-driven orders and wash trading. 

Web traffic to exchanges remained mostly unchanged, though South Korean markets like Upbit and KuCoin saw increased visits. MEXC continued to slow down, losing 8% of its site visits. 

Traders searched for short-term resolution

Crypto trading in January saw an uptick in volumes, while most assets took a downturn. For some DEXs and markets, activity reached peak levels, as traders divested their positions. 

A part of the volume expansion was due to selling, as well as some spot accumulation. Without a clear directional move and greed sentiment, the current spot-driven market may mean a period of sideways trading for major assets. 

DEXs retained a relatively high share of 16.9% of centralized activity. Those markets were also more widely used by retail and for meme token trading. Centralized market orders also diminished in size. 

The size of spot orders declined in January, while smaller whales and retail reappeared in February. | Source: Cryptoquant

In the past weeks, retail orders returned, alongside orders from smaller whales. Larger whales continued with silent accumulation, but did not add to active daily trading volumes.

While the market moves sideways, smaller wallets were noticed buying back BTC, as well as ETH, while whales continued to sell. Crypto trades with peak uncertainty and higher volatility, as questions were raised on whether BTC could go lower in an extended bear market.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.
Russia extends firewall to limits amid censorship of Telegram, WhatsApp, and YouTubeThe full blocking of WhatsApp in Russia is linked to the nation’s firewall running out of capacity amid attempts to slow down Telegram, experts in the field suggest. Besides the two messengers, Russian authorities are also cutting traffic to YouTube, overloading the technology employed by the state to censor internet for its citizens. Russia extends itself to block massive online content and communication The sudden and complete restriction of access to the popular messenger WhatsApp and YouTube in Russia is likely related to efforts to slow down Telegram, local media unveiled, quoting specialists with knowledge of how the system works. Russia’s telecom watchdog, Roskomnadzor, removed the WhatsApp domain from its DNS servers on Wednesday, effectively preventing the use of Meta’s messaging service in the country. It appears it did that also with Google’s video sharing platform a day earlier. The domains have been deleted from the National Domain Name System (NDNS), established after the adoption of the so-called “sovereign internet” law. Under the legislation, the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor) is responsible for enforcing the Russian equivalent to the Chinese framework for internet control. The strategy is the same in both case, so is the reason which is of technical nature, according to Dzhemali Avalishvili, managing director of the infrastructure integrator Ultimatek, who commented on the latest developments for RBC. Quoted by the Russian business news portal, Avalishvili explained further: “There’s only one reason, and it’s technical – the TSPU equipment is operating at the limit of its capacity.” The TSPU (Technical Means of Counteracting Threats) devices are deployed at internet service providers to allow them to throttle or block internet traffic to targeted platforms. In comparison with China’s “Great Firewall,” which operates on a national level, Russia’s solution allows for more precise, highly targeted and geographically defined restricting. However, the Russian system isn’t built to last, Avalishvili pointed out, and is running out of resources now when it has to deal with multiple and widely used platforms. He elaborated: “The infrastructure simply can’t handle simultaneously squashing YouTube, Telegram, and WhatsApp. It’s like trying to run three heavy apps on an old laptop.” Targeting Telegram is harder and requires resources that Russia doesn’t have Slowing down Telegram is much harder than in the case of all of the other affected services and websites, the expert emphasized. He highlighted that tech entrepreneur Pavel Durov’s messenger has stronger security and more experience with previous attempts to block it in other countries. Avalishvili added that Telegram’s unique architecture relies on a distributed infrastructure of mirrors and content delivery networks (CDNs). “Its encryption protocol is designed to make deep packet inspection (DPI) as difficult as possible. To slow down Telegram, you need to deploy colossal computing power,” he detailed. The privacy-oriented messenger has tens of millions of users in Russia, and not only among citizens and businesses, but also government institutions and other organizations. Almost everyone in the country has the messenger installed on their smartphones, logging in several times a day to read and write, chimed in Alexey Uchakin, an independent telecom market specialist. “This represents a huge amount of traffic and a huge number of connections from end-user devices to Telegram servers. The messenger has learned to bypass many standard blocking mechanisms.” While WhatsApp used to be more popular in the Russian Federation, it never significantly modernized its infrastructure to successfully circumvent Moscow’s restrictions, he noted, agreeing that blocking Telegram is definitely harder. He is convinced that Roskomnadzor is removing the domains of previously restricted services to “clear up resources to slow down Telegram.” In a broad interview with the official TASS news agency, the Kremlin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov insisted that the messenger must comply with Russia’s laws and ensure protection for its citizens, before the restrictions are removed, although some say Moscow has already made up its mind about its future. President Putin’s press secretary set similar conditions for resuming WhatsApp’s full services in Russia, where its parent company, Facebook’s owner Meta, has been designated as an “extremist” organization. He accused the latter of lacking the willingness to engage in dialogue with Russian authorities on the matter. Roskmonadzor limited voice calls through both apps in August, alleging they were increasingly being used by fraudsters and extremists. The measures against them seem to be part of a campaign to make Russians use a state-approved alternative called Max, which critics say can be used for surveillance and censorship. Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Russia extends firewall to limits amid censorship of Telegram, WhatsApp, and YouTube

The full blocking of WhatsApp in Russia is linked to the nation’s firewall running out of capacity amid attempts to slow down Telegram, experts in the field suggest.

Besides the two messengers, Russian authorities are also cutting traffic to YouTube, overloading the technology employed by the state to censor internet for its citizens.

Russia extends itself to block massive online content and communication

The sudden and complete restriction of access to the popular messenger WhatsApp and YouTube in Russia is likely related to efforts to slow down Telegram, local media unveiled, quoting specialists with knowledge of how the system works.

Russia’s telecom watchdog, Roskomnadzor, removed the WhatsApp domain from its DNS servers on Wednesday, effectively preventing the use of Meta’s messaging service in the country. It appears it did that also with Google’s video sharing platform a day earlier.

The domains have been deleted from the National Domain Name System (NDNS), established after the adoption of the so-called “sovereign internet” law.

Under the legislation, the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor) is responsible for enforcing the Russian equivalent to the Chinese framework for internet control.

The strategy is the same in both case, so is the reason which is of technical nature, according to Dzhemali Avalishvili, managing director of the infrastructure integrator Ultimatek, who commented on the latest developments for RBC. Quoted by the Russian business news portal, Avalishvili explained further:

“There’s only one reason, and it’s technical – the TSPU equipment is operating at the limit of its capacity.”

The TSPU (Technical Means of Counteracting Threats) devices are deployed at internet service providers to allow them to throttle or block internet traffic to targeted platforms.

In comparison with China’s “Great Firewall,” which operates on a national level, Russia’s solution allows for more precise, highly targeted and geographically defined restricting.

However, the Russian system isn’t built to last, Avalishvili pointed out, and is running out of resources now when it has to deal with multiple and widely used platforms. He elaborated:

“The infrastructure simply can’t handle simultaneously squashing YouTube, Telegram, and WhatsApp. It’s like trying to run three heavy apps on an old laptop.”

Targeting Telegram is harder and requires resources that Russia doesn’t have

Slowing down Telegram is much harder than in the case of all of the other affected services and websites, the expert emphasized.

He highlighted that tech entrepreneur Pavel Durov’s messenger has stronger security and more experience with previous attempts to block it in other countries.

Avalishvili added that Telegram’s unique architecture relies on a distributed infrastructure of mirrors and content delivery networks (CDNs).

“Its encryption protocol is designed to make deep packet inspection (DPI) as difficult as possible. To slow down Telegram, you need to deploy colossal computing power,” he detailed.

The privacy-oriented messenger has tens of millions of users in Russia, and not only among citizens and businesses, but also government institutions and other organizations.

Almost everyone in the country has the messenger installed on their smartphones, logging in several times a day to read and write, chimed in Alexey Uchakin, an independent telecom market specialist.

“This represents a huge amount of traffic and a huge number of connections from end-user devices to Telegram servers. The messenger has learned to bypass many standard blocking mechanisms.”

While WhatsApp used to be more popular in the Russian Federation, it never significantly modernized its infrastructure to successfully circumvent Moscow’s restrictions, he noted, agreeing that blocking Telegram is definitely harder.

He is convinced that Roskomnadzor is removing the domains of previously restricted services to “clear up resources to slow down Telegram.”

In a broad interview with the official TASS news agency, the Kremlin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov insisted that the messenger must comply with Russia’s laws and ensure protection for its citizens, before the restrictions are removed, although some say Moscow has already made up its mind about its future.

President Putin’s press secretary set similar conditions for resuming WhatsApp’s full services in Russia, where its parent company, Facebook’s owner Meta, has been designated as an “extremist” organization. He accused the latter of lacking the willingness to engage in dialogue with Russian authorities on the matter.

Roskmonadzor limited voice calls through both apps in August, alleging they were increasingly being used by fraudsters and extremists. The measures against them seem to be part of a campaign to make Russians use a state-approved alternative called Max, which critics say can be used for surveillance and censorship.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.
World Liberty Financial reveals World Swap to expand USD1 into forex, cross-border paymentsWorld Liberty Financial is expanding its operations into foreign exchange trading in order to strengthen its USD1 stablecoin ecosystem. The Trump-associated crypto firm confirmed at Consensus Hong Kong that it will launch “World Swap”, a USD1-based forex platform.  Co-founder Zak Folkman said more information will be released at an upcoming Mar-a-Lago event. However, the core goal is already obvious. World Liberty Financial wants USD1 to anchor a full-stack digital finance network that includes payments, lending, asset tokenization, and now foreign exchange. World Liberty takes on the global money game World Liberty Financial aims to compete directly with traditional remittance firms. According to company statements, legacy operators charge between 2% – 10% per transfer. Therefore, World Swap aims to reduce costs by incorporating cross-border currency exchange into the USD1 ecosystem. Users will send and receive digital dollars via an interface aimed to be similar to mainstream payment apps. As a result, the platform aims to reduce the friction commonly associated with managing crypto wallets and private keys.  USD1 is at the base of the whole model. The stablecoin has reached more than $5 billion in market capitalization in the first year of its existence. It is now among the top 25 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization. Folkman said that the growth of stablecoins has enabled the firm to accelerate product development.  USD1 powers a bold market expansion World Liberty Financial has continually expanded its product line. At the Hong Kong conference, Folkman described World Liberty Markets as a lending platform that raised hundreds of millions of dollars in deposits within weeks of its launch.  The firm has also secured partnerships with decentralized finance protocols to increase the circulation of stablecoins. These collaborations are looking to inject USD1 into multiple blockchain environments. Therefore, adoption is no longer confined to peer-to-peer payments. Last month, the company partnered with Spacecoin to develop a USD1-focused token swap system. Spacecoin launched three satellites into low Earth orbit to support its network infrastructure. The satellite structure will be based on World Liberty’s financial systems for transaction processing, connecting digital finance with space-based communications. In addition, the company has announced plans to introduce real-world asset products that are collateralized by USD1. This initiative is aimed at institutional investors who are seeking exposure to tokenized traditional assets. The RWA offerings will also increase the stablecoin’s utility beyond peer-to-peer transactions. World Liberty Financial also unveiled a branded WLFI debit card that will enable holders to spend digital assets in everyday activities. The card is meant to link crypto balances with traditional payment networks.  Meanwhile, the firm’s native token, WLFI, has been moving higher. As of the latest data, WLFI is trading around $0.107, up 7.53% over the past 24 hours. Market capitalization is about $2.86 billion.  Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

World Liberty Financial reveals World Swap to expand USD1 into forex, cross-border payments

World Liberty Financial is expanding its operations into foreign exchange trading in order to strengthen its USD1 stablecoin ecosystem. The Trump-associated crypto firm confirmed at Consensus Hong Kong that it will launch “World Swap”, a USD1-based forex platform. 

Co-founder Zak Folkman said more information will be released at an upcoming Mar-a-Lago event. However, the core goal is already obvious. World Liberty Financial wants USD1 to anchor a full-stack digital finance network that includes payments, lending, asset tokenization, and now foreign exchange.

World Liberty takes on the global money game

World Liberty Financial aims to compete directly with traditional remittance firms. According to company statements, legacy operators charge between 2% – 10% per transfer. Therefore, World Swap aims to reduce costs by incorporating cross-border currency exchange into the USD1 ecosystem.

Users will send and receive digital dollars via an interface aimed to be similar to mainstream payment apps. As a result, the platform aims to reduce the friction commonly associated with managing crypto wallets and private keys. 

USD1 is at the base of the whole model. The stablecoin has reached more than $5 billion in market capitalization in the first year of its existence. It is now among the top 25 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization. Folkman said that the growth of stablecoins has enabled the firm to accelerate product development. 

USD1 powers a bold market expansion

World Liberty Financial has continually expanded its product line. At the Hong Kong conference, Folkman described World Liberty Markets as a lending platform that raised hundreds of millions of dollars in deposits within weeks of its launch. 

The firm has also secured partnerships with decentralized finance protocols to increase the circulation of stablecoins. These collaborations are looking to inject USD1 into multiple blockchain environments. Therefore, adoption is no longer confined to peer-to-peer payments.

Last month, the company partnered with Spacecoin to develop a USD1-focused token swap system. Spacecoin launched three satellites into low Earth orbit to support its network infrastructure. The satellite structure will be based on World Liberty’s financial systems for transaction processing, connecting digital finance with space-based communications.

In addition, the company has announced plans to introduce real-world asset products that are collateralized by USD1. This initiative is aimed at institutional investors who are seeking exposure to tokenized traditional assets. The RWA offerings will also increase the stablecoin’s utility beyond peer-to-peer transactions.

World Liberty Financial also unveiled a branded WLFI debit card that will enable holders to spend digital assets in everyday activities. The card is meant to link crypto balances with traditional payment networks. 

Meanwhile, the firm’s native token, WLFI, has been moving higher. As of the latest data, WLFI is trading around $0.107, up 7.53% over the past 24 hours. Market capitalization is about $2.86 billion. 

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.
Samsung targets SK Hynix market share with 46% faster speeds HBM4 claimsSamsung Electronics has begun mass production and shipment of its next-generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM4), claiming significant performance gains that challenge longtime rival SK Hynix’s dominance and intensify competition with other players like Micron. According to Samsung, its HBM4 chips deliver a consistent transfer speed of 11.7 gigabits per second (Gbps), roughly 46% faster than the JEDEC industry standard of 8 Gbps, and can be pushed to 13 Gbps under optimized conditions. In a statement dated Thursday, February 12, Samsung mentioned that it is striving to keep up with the high demand for Nvidia Corp.’s graphics chips. This surging demand stems from the chips’ cutting-edge features, positioning them as the industry-leading choice for AI model training and operationalization. Samsung seeks to solidify its position as a leader in the tech industry  For some time, Samsung has observed its competitor, SK Hynix Inc., gaining dominant market share and capturing the majority of Nvidia’s high-bandwidth memory orders. High-bandwidth memory is a key component for AI accelerators. Nonetheless, after years of hard work, Samsung recently narrowed this gap through its latest strategic move. Both tech giants have solidified their positions as the most valuable tech firms in South Korea by market capitalization. Moreover, they have witnessed a significant surge in their stock prices since September last year amid fears of a memory shortage.  Responding to these fears, the Corporate President and Chief Technology Officer (CTO) of Samsung Electronics’ Device Solutions Business, Jaihyuk Song, forecast significant supply constraints for both this year and next.  Meanwhile, regarding Samsung’s first delivery phase for its new HBM4 memory chips, Song mentioned that they are setting the standard in the high-performance memory industry again, reigniting growth as the definitive leader in memory. Afterwards, the industry executive asserted that the company’s stock prices would rise significantly to high levels. He expressed this unexpected confidence in Seoul during the Semicon Korea conference, where he was the featured speaker. Song made these remarks after another senior executive from Samsung earlier shared a brief message stating that the tech giant is back. This statement sparked hope that Nvidia will soon adopt the firm’s next-generation high-bandwidth memory as its preferred option. “We’re showing Samsung’s true abilities once more,” Song said, further arguing that, “Although we haven’t fully showcased how Samsung meets customer needs with top-notch technology for a while, you can see this as our return to form.”  Memory supply shortage remains a primary concern in the industry  Regarding shortages in memory chip supply, Samsung’s industry executives said this situation could trigger price hikes across the industry, impacting the firm’s own client products. To further demonstrate the intensity of the situation, reports highlighted that, despite its status as the top memory producer, Samsung is constrained by the escalating costs of these foundational components, which range from smartphones and laptops to smart home devices and self-driving vehicles. During an interview, Wonjin Lee, president and head of global marketing, commented on this matter. He noted that, “There will be challenges with semiconductor supplies, and everyone will feel the impact,” adding that, “Prices are increasing right now. We definitely don’t want to pass that cost onto consumers, but we may reach a point where we have to rethink our product pricing.”  Lee made this statement at CES in Las Vegas, where the company was exhibiting its full lineup of electronic products from small wireless earbuds to top-notch 130-inch TVs. Like many event exhibitors, Samsung sought to promote its vision of a more connected, AI-enhanced product lineup amid rising production costs. Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Samsung targets SK Hynix market share with 46% faster speeds HBM4 claims

Samsung Electronics has begun mass production and shipment of its next-generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM4), claiming significant performance gains that challenge longtime rival SK Hynix’s dominance and intensify competition with other players like Micron.

According to Samsung, its HBM4 chips deliver a consistent transfer speed of 11.7 gigabits per second (Gbps), roughly 46% faster than the JEDEC industry standard of 8 Gbps, and can be pushed to 13 Gbps under optimized conditions.

In a statement dated Thursday, February 12, Samsung mentioned that it is striving to keep up with the high demand for Nvidia Corp.’s graphics chips. This surging demand stems from the chips’ cutting-edge features, positioning them as the industry-leading choice for AI model training and operationalization.

Samsung seeks to solidify its position as a leader in the tech industry 

For some time, Samsung has observed its competitor, SK Hynix Inc., gaining dominant market share and capturing the majority of Nvidia’s high-bandwidth memory orders. High-bandwidth memory is a key component for AI accelerators.

Nonetheless, after years of hard work, Samsung recently narrowed this gap through its latest strategic move. Both tech giants have solidified their positions as the most valuable tech firms in South Korea by market capitalization. Moreover, they have witnessed a significant surge in their stock prices since September last year amid fears of a memory shortage. 

Responding to these fears, the Corporate President and Chief Technology Officer (CTO) of Samsung Electronics’ Device Solutions Business, Jaihyuk Song, forecast significant supply constraints for both this year and next. 

Meanwhile, regarding Samsung’s first delivery phase for its new HBM4 memory chips, Song mentioned that they are setting the standard in the high-performance memory industry again, reigniting growth as the definitive leader in memory. Afterwards, the industry executive asserted that the company’s stock prices would rise significantly to high levels.

He expressed this unexpected confidence in Seoul during the Semicon Korea conference, where he was the featured speaker. Song made these remarks after another senior executive from Samsung earlier shared a brief message stating that the tech giant is back. This statement sparked hope that Nvidia will soon adopt the firm’s next-generation high-bandwidth memory as its preferred option.

“We’re showing Samsung’s true abilities once more,” Song said, further arguing that, “Although we haven’t fully showcased how Samsung meets customer needs with top-notch technology for a while, you can see this as our return to form.” 

Memory supply shortage remains a primary concern in the industry 

Regarding shortages in memory chip supply, Samsung’s industry executives said this situation could trigger price hikes across the industry, impacting the firm’s own client products.

To further demonstrate the intensity of the situation, reports highlighted that, despite its status as the top memory producer, Samsung is constrained by the escalating costs of these foundational components, which range from smartphones and laptops to smart home devices and self-driving vehicles.

During an interview, Wonjin Lee, president and head of global marketing, commented on this matter. He noted that, “There will be challenges with semiconductor supplies, and everyone will feel the impact,” adding that, “Prices are increasing right now. We definitely don’t want to pass that cost onto consumers, but we may reach a point where we have to rethink our product pricing.” 

Lee made this statement at CES in Las Vegas, where the company was exhibiting its full lineup of electronic products from small wireless earbuds to top-notch 130-inch TVs. Like many event exhibitors, Samsung sought to promote its vision of a more connected, AI-enhanced product lineup amid rising production costs.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.
Israeli prosecutors indict IDF reservist and civilian for Polymarket insider trading on Iran attacksIsraeli authorities have formally charged an army reservist and a civilian accused of using classified military information to place bets on Polymarket. According to court documents and official statements released Thursday, the Tel Aviv District Court lifted a gag order at the request of the State Attorney’s Office cyber department, allowing limited disclosure of the investigation.  State officials claim the accused reservist had accessed classified information during his military service, which he passed to a civilian to place wagers online. Israeli law enforcement confirmed the suspects were arrested during a joint operation with domestic security agency Shin Bet, the Arazim investigations unit within the Defense Ministry’s Security Authority, and Israel Police. Ex-military shared classified data that a civilian used on Polymarket  Local news outlet The Jerusalem Post reported that prosecutors filed indictments against both suspects on several charges, including severe security offenses, bribery, and obstruction of justice. The investigators allege the pair used confidential operational information to gain a betting advantage in military-related markets. “The defense establishment emphasizes that placing such bets, based on secret and classified information, poses a real security risk to IDF operations and to the security of the state,” a joint statement from authorities read. The officials noted they would “thwart and bring to justice anyone involved in the unlawful use of classified information.” The Israeli military separately condemned the alleged conduct, stating the reservist’s actions represented “a serious ethical failure and a clear crossing of a red line, which are inconsistent with the IDF’s values and the standards expected of its service members.” Last month, Israel’s public broadcaster Kan reported that Shin Bet had begun investigating suspicions that someone within the defense establishment was leaking classified documents for betting purposes. According to information from the said investigation, an online user with the moniker ricosuave666 made bets which correctly foretold Israeli military activities against Iran. According to the prosecution, these wagers amounted to tens of thousands of dollars, with an estimated profit of $150,000. However, the reservist’s Attorney, Nir Cohen Rochverger, has disputed some elements of the charges. Rochverger said authorities had to drop an earlier allegation claiming his client harmed Israel’s national security. “Our client is a highly regarded individual who has made a significant contribution to Israel’s security. Due to the broad gag order, we cannot at this stage address the matter in detail, only clarify what it does not contain,” he said in a statement. He also mentioned that the defense intends to challenge the case on several grounds, including the agencies’ involvement in investigative misconduct.  “We have strong arguments regarding the indictment that was filed, the defects in it, selective enforcement, and the improper and severe conduct of the investigative bodies, which itself caused harm to security. We are convinced that once these are presented, the case will conclude in a manner entirely different from how it began.” Insider trading allegations put spotlight on prediction markets The Israeli case joins a list of instances in which authorities believe classified information was used in decentralized prediction markets. Regulators and lawmakers in several jurisdictions, like the US, are probing whether existing financial or gambling laws adequately cover prediction markets. In January, US Representative Ritchie Torres proposed legislation to stop insider trading on such platforms after a trader reportedly earned about $400,000 by wagering on the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, hours before the news became public. Advocates of prediction markets argue that such activities should not be classified as simply “gambling.” The thought is the collective betting information provides better insight into what will happen in the future compared to traditional polls. “It’s the most accurate thing we have as mankind right now, until someone else creates some sort of super crystal ball,” Polymarket chief executive Shayne Coplan told CBS’s 60 Minutes last November. Blockchain analyst Andrew 10 Gwei, who has investigated insider trading within crypto startups, said prediction markets share information with the public faster than conventional news channels. “You gain access to critical information about key world events faster than everyone else,” he said. Kalshi recently recorded one of its busiest trading days during the Super Bowl, with users placing a $113 million pool predicting which song the Puerto Rican singer Bad Bunny would perform at halftime. Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Israeli prosecutors indict IDF reservist and civilian for Polymarket insider trading on Iran attacks

Israeli authorities have formally charged an army reservist and a civilian accused of using classified military information to place bets on Polymarket.

According to court documents and official statements released Thursday, the Tel Aviv District Court lifted a gag order at the request of the State Attorney’s Office cyber department, allowing limited disclosure of the investigation. 

State officials claim the accused reservist had accessed classified information during his military service, which he passed to a civilian to place wagers online.

Israeli law enforcement confirmed the suspects were arrested during a joint operation with domestic security agency Shin Bet, the Arazim investigations unit within the Defense Ministry’s Security Authority, and Israel Police.

Ex-military shared classified data that a civilian used on Polymarket 

Local news outlet The Jerusalem Post reported that prosecutors filed indictments against both suspects on several charges, including severe security offenses, bribery, and obstruction of justice. The investigators allege the pair used confidential operational information to gain a betting advantage in military-related markets.

“The defense establishment emphasizes that placing such bets, based on secret and classified information, poses a real security risk to IDF operations and to the security of the state,” a joint statement from authorities read. The officials noted they would “thwart and bring to justice anyone involved in the unlawful use of classified information.”

The Israeli military separately condemned the alleged conduct, stating the reservist’s actions represented “a serious ethical failure and a clear crossing of a red line, which are inconsistent with the IDF’s values and the standards expected of its service members.”

Last month, Israel’s public broadcaster Kan reported that Shin Bet had begun investigating suspicions that someone within the defense establishment was leaking classified documents for betting purposes.

According to information from the said investigation, an online user with the moniker ricosuave666 made bets which correctly foretold Israeli military activities against Iran. According to the prosecution, these wagers amounted to tens of thousands of dollars, with an estimated profit of $150,000.

However, the reservist’s Attorney, Nir Cohen Rochverger, has disputed some elements of the charges. Rochverger said authorities had to drop an earlier allegation claiming his client harmed Israel’s national security.

“Our client is a highly regarded individual who has made a significant contribution to Israel’s security. Due to the broad gag order, we cannot at this stage address the matter in detail, only clarify what it does not contain,” he said in a statement.

He also mentioned that the defense intends to challenge the case on several grounds, including the agencies’ involvement in investigative misconduct. 

“We have strong arguments regarding the indictment that was filed, the defects in it, selective enforcement, and the improper and severe conduct of the investigative bodies, which itself caused harm to security. We are convinced that once these are presented, the case will conclude in a manner entirely different from how it began.”

Insider trading allegations put spotlight on prediction markets

The Israeli case joins a list of instances in which authorities believe classified information was used in decentralized prediction markets. Regulators and lawmakers in several jurisdictions, like the US, are probing whether existing financial or gambling laws adequately cover prediction markets.

In January, US Representative Ritchie Torres proposed legislation to stop insider trading on such platforms after a trader reportedly earned about $400,000 by wagering on the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, hours before the news became public.

Advocates of prediction markets argue that such activities should not be classified as simply “gambling.” The thought is the collective betting information provides better insight into what will happen in the future compared to traditional polls.

“It’s the most accurate thing we have as mankind right now, until someone else creates some sort of super crystal ball,” Polymarket chief executive Shayne Coplan told CBS’s 60 Minutes last November.

Blockchain analyst Andrew 10 Gwei, who has investigated insider trading within crypto startups, said prediction markets share information with the public faster than conventional news channels. “You gain access to critical information about key world events faster than everyone else,” he said.

Kalshi recently recorded one of its busiest trading days during the Super Bowl, with users placing a $113 million pool predicting which song the Puerto Rican singer Bad Bunny would perform at halftime.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.
Mercedes profit falls 57% in 2025 due to $1.2 billion in tariffs and weak China salesMercedes just posted one of its toughest years in recent memory. Full-year earnings before interest and taxes dropped 57% in 2025. The damage came largely from about $1.2 billion in tariff costs, heavy price pressure in China, and currency headwinds. Revenue fell 9.2% to €132.2 billion. Net profit dropped 48.8% to €5.3 billion. Earnings per share slid to €5.34 from €10.19. Free cash flow from the industrial business came in at €5.4 billion, down from €9.2 billion a year earlier. Even with that hit, Mercedes said results landed within its own guidance. Adjusted EBIT reached €8.2 billion compared with €13.7 billion in 2024. Net liquidity in the industrial business stood at €32.2 billion at year end, slightly higher than €31.4 billion the year before. Shareholders still got a total return above 20% in 2025, and Mercedes proposed a dividend of €3.50 per share. Mercedes reports full 2025 financial results across all divisions The cars division took the biggest punch. Adjusted EBIT at Mercedes Cars fell to €4.8 billion from €8.7 billion. Revenue dropped 10.5% to €96.4 billion. Unit sales declined 9.2% to 1,801,291 vehicles. Battery electric vehicle sales fell 8.8% to 168,823 units. Electrified vehicles overall reached 368,700 units, barely above last year. The xEV share rose to 20.5% of total sales from 18.5%. Adjusted return on sales at Mercedes Cars landed at 5.0%, down from 8.1%. Without tariffs it would have been 6.1%. Cash flow before interest and taxes dropped to €5.2 billion. The adjusted cash conversion rate improved to 1.2. Research and development spending declined year over year, while investments in property, plant and equipment increased due to new product launches. Cost savings under the Next Level Performance plan added more than €3.5 billion to EBIT. The vans division at Mercedes delivered an adjusted return on sales of 10.2%. That was lower than 14.6% in 2024 but still double digit. Unit sales fell 11.5% to 359,136 vans. Fully electric van sales jumped 46% to 28,488 units. BEVs made up 7.9% of global van sales and 11% in Europe. Revenue declined 11.2% to €17.1 billion. Adjusted EBIT reached €1.75 billion. Cash flow before interest and taxes fell to €951 million. Mercedes Financial Services reported adjusted EBIT of €1.27 billion, up from €1.13 billion. Adjusted return on equity improved to 9.7% from 8.7%. Total portfolio volume stood at €128.8 billion, down from €138.1 billion. New business reached €55.9 billion. Revenue in the unit slipped 1.8% to €24.6 billion. The finance arm merged with vehicle sales at the end of December 2025 to form a single customer-focused structure. Mercedes accelerates product launches and outlines cost cuts through 2027 In 2025, Mercedes launched the all-new CLA at the start of the year and ended the year with the new GLB and GLC. The CLA won Europe’s Car of the Year 2026 and Euro NCAP’s Best Performer among 2025 tested vehicles. Order books stretch well into the second half of 2026. Production runs on three shifts in some plants. Quarterly BEV volumes improved as the year went on. The upgraded S-Class now includes a new V8 engine and the MB.OS operating system. The model carries an updateable MB.OS Supercomputer, fourth-generation MBUX, and MB.DRIVE ASSIST PRO point-to-point assisted driving. China gets the system first, with the United States following later in 2026. Chief executive Ola Källenius said, “We successfully kicked off our biggest ever product and tech launch program in 2025. We are launching more than 40 new models in three years.” Looking ahead, Mercedes expects 2026 group revenue to match 2025 levels. Group EBIT should come in significantly above 2025. Free cash flow from the industrial business will likely sit slightly below 2025. Adjusted return on sales for cars is guided between 3% and 5%. Vans are guided at 8% to 10%. Financial Services return on equity is seen between 10% and 12%. Medium term, Mercedes targets around 2 million vehicle sales, with more than a 15% increase in Top-End sales and a doubling of xEV share. Global production capacity will be adjusted to about 2.2 million units by 2028. Assembly at the COMPAS joint venture in Mexico ends in 2026. Germany capacity will be 900,000 units and Hungary up to 400,000 units. Production costs per unit are set to fall 10% from 2027 versus 2024. Fixed costs should drop 10% between 2024 and 2027. Material cost savings are targeted at 8% by 2027 and 10% beyond that. In China, Mercedes aims to cut local material costs by 10%, variable production costs by 20%, and fixed costs by 20% by 2027 through local partnerships including Momenta and ByteDance. Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

Mercedes profit falls 57% in 2025 due to $1.2 billion in tariffs and weak China sales

Mercedes just posted one of its toughest years in recent memory. Full-year earnings before interest and taxes dropped 57% in 2025. The damage came largely from about $1.2 billion in tariff costs, heavy price pressure in China, and currency headwinds.

Revenue fell 9.2% to €132.2 billion. Net profit dropped 48.8% to €5.3 billion. Earnings per share slid to €5.34 from €10.19. Free cash flow from the industrial business came in at €5.4 billion, down from €9.2 billion a year earlier.

Even with that hit, Mercedes said results landed within its own guidance. Adjusted EBIT reached €8.2 billion compared with €13.7 billion in 2024.

Net liquidity in the industrial business stood at €32.2 billion at year end, slightly higher than €31.4 billion the year before. Shareholders still got a total return above 20% in 2025, and Mercedes proposed a dividend of €3.50 per share.

Mercedes reports full 2025 financial results across all divisions

The cars division took the biggest punch. Adjusted EBIT at Mercedes Cars fell to €4.8 billion from €8.7 billion. Revenue dropped 10.5% to €96.4 billion. Unit sales declined 9.2% to 1,801,291 vehicles.

Battery electric vehicle sales fell 8.8% to 168,823 units. Electrified vehicles overall reached 368,700 units, barely above last year. The xEV share rose to 20.5% of total sales from 18.5%.

Adjusted return on sales at Mercedes Cars landed at 5.0%, down from 8.1%. Without tariffs it would have been 6.1%. Cash flow before interest and taxes dropped to €5.2 billion. The adjusted cash conversion rate improved to 1.2. Research and development spending declined year over year, while investments in property, plant and equipment increased due to new product launches. Cost savings under the Next Level Performance plan added more than €3.5 billion to EBIT.

The vans division at Mercedes delivered an adjusted return on sales of 10.2%. That was lower than 14.6% in 2024 but still double digit. Unit sales fell 11.5% to 359,136 vans.

Fully electric van sales jumped 46% to 28,488 units. BEVs made up 7.9% of global van sales and 11% in Europe. Revenue declined 11.2% to €17.1 billion. Adjusted EBIT reached €1.75 billion. Cash flow before interest and taxes fell to €951 million.

Mercedes Financial Services reported adjusted EBIT of €1.27 billion, up from €1.13 billion. Adjusted return on equity improved to 9.7% from 8.7%. Total portfolio volume stood at €128.8 billion, down from €138.1 billion.

New business reached €55.9 billion. Revenue in the unit slipped 1.8% to €24.6 billion. The finance arm merged with vehicle sales at the end of December 2025 to form a single customer-focused structure.

Mercedes accelerates product launches and outlines cost cuts through 2027

In 2025, Mercedes launched the all-new CLA at the start of the year and ended the year with the new GLB and GLC. The CLA won Europe’s Car of the Year 2026 and Euro NCAP’s Best Performer among 2025 tested vehicles. Order books stretch well into the second half of 2026. Production runs on three shifts in some plants. Quarterly BEV volumes improved as the year went on.

The upgraded S-Class now includes a new V8 engine and the MB.OS operating system. The model carries an updateable MB.OS Supercomputer, fourth-generation MBUX, and MB.DRIVE ASSIST PRO point-to-point assisted driving. China gets the system first, with the United States following later in 2026.

Chief executive Ola Källenius said, “We successfully kicked off our biggest ever product and tech launch program in 2025. We are launching more than 40 new models in three years.”

Looking ahead, Mercedes expects 2026 group revenue to match 2025 levels. Group EBIT should come in significantly above 2025. Free cash flow from the industrial business will likely sit slightly below 2025.

Adjusted return on sales for cars is guided between 3% and 5%. Vans are guided at 8% to 10%. Financial Services return on equity is seen between 10% and 12%.

Medium term, Mercedes targets around 2 million vehicle sales, with more than a 15% increase in Top-End sales and a doubling of xEV share. Global production capacity will be adjusted to about 2.2 million units by 2028.

Assembly at the COMPAS joint venture in Mexico ends in 2026. Germany capacity will be 900,000 units and Hungary up to 400,000 units.

Production costs per unit are set to fall 10% from 2027 versus 2024. Fixed costs should drop 10% between 2024 and 2027. Material cost savings are targeted at 8% by 2027 and 10% beyond that.

In China, Mercedes aims to cut local material costs by 10%, variable production costs by 20%, and fixed costs by 20% by 2027 through local partnerships including Momenta and ByteDance.

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.
Inicia sesión para explorar más contenidos
Conoce las noticias más recientes del sector
⚡️ Participa en los últimos debates del mundo cripto
💬 Interactúa con tus creadores favoritos
👍 Disfruta contenido de tu interés
Email/número de teléfono
Mapa del sitio
Preferencias de cookies
Términos y condiciones de la plataforma