Binance Square
BITZ0
7.9k Publicaciones

BITZ0

Verificado Plus de Binance Square
The most recent news about the crypto industry at Bitzo
1 Siguiendo
1.1K+ Seguidores
2.6K+ Me gusta
Publicaciones
·
--
Ver traducción
BEP20 on a Budget: 5 BNB Chain Casinos Compared on Deposit CostA BEP20 casino deposit is now among the least expensive available, and BNB Chain got there quietly to fund a casino account, and it did it by cutting block times three times in eighteen months. A transfer now costs about half a cent and confirms in under a second. Here is where that cost comes from, the choice that used to go wrong and no longer can, and where to spend it. Why a BEP20 Transfer Costs So Little Five things stack up, and the first is the one that did most of the work. The network standardised on 0.05 gwei. BNB Chain's own documentation puts the standard gas price there, which produces typical transaction fees around $0.005 or less. That is a network-wide convention, not a temporary market condition. Block time fell to roughly 0.45 seconds. Three consecutive hardforks did it: Lorentz, Maxwell, and Fermi took the chain from three seconds down to under half a second. Faster blocks mean less queuing and less fee pressure. Capacity outruns demand. With blocks arriving twice a second, the chain rarely fills, so the auction dynamic that pushes Ethereum fees up has little room to operate. It is EVM-compatible without Ethereum's congestion. BEP-20 is a direct adaptation of ERC-20, so tooling and address formats are familiar, without inheriting the fee market that comes with them. Real-world cost lands between half a cent and five cents. Third-party tracking through 2025 and 2026 puts typical transfers in the $0.01 to $0.05 range depending on token and contract complexity, which is the figure to plan around instead of the theoretical floor. Exchanges and platforms typically credit BEP-20 deposits in under two minutes, so the practical experience is quick and inexpensive without needing you to configure anything. The Network Choice That Used to Catch People This one is worth knowing because outdated guides still warn about it. BNB used to exist across two standards. BEP-2 belonged to the old Beacon Chain and BEP-20 to BNB Smart Chain, and choosing the wrong one sent funds somewhere the recipient could not reach. It was a genuine source of lost deposits for years. BEP-2 retired with Beacon Chain in 2024 and its assets migrated across. So in 2026, when a cashier asks which BNB network to use, the answer is effectively always BNB Smart Chain, BEP-20. The old failure mode has been removed by decommissioning the thing that caused it. One requirement remains. Gas in BNB is the requirement here, so moving a BEP-20 token means holding a small BNB balance for gas. Arriving with only USDT and no BNB leaves you looking at a balance you cannot send, which is the same pattern as ETH on Ethereum. At half a cent per transaction, a dollar of BNB covers an enormous amount of activity. Five Platforms Crediting BEP20 All five accept BNB Chain deposits, which matters because the chain hosts one of the largest USDT supplies in circulation. Ordered on what the cashier adds above network cost. Dexsport adds nothing above the network fee, so a BEP-20 deposit costs you what BNB Chain charges. It runs a multi-coin, multi-network cashier with BNB Chain among the supported networks, and being non-custodial means a settled balance sits in a wallet you hold instead of behind a withdrawal threshold. The licence is Anjouan, lighter than Curacao or Malta, and restricted territories cover the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia. Stake credits BEP-20 across a large cashier with per-asset withdrawal minimums published, which is the figure deciding whether a small balance can leave. Balances are custodial. BC.Game offers comparable breadth under a long Curacao trading record, with BNB Chain among the standard rails and clearly documented minimums. Vave supports BEP-20 within multi-coin funding across several chains, with a solid third-party catalogue and no originals suite. Mega Dice accepts BNB Chain deposits through a Telegram-first flow, though withdrawal terms are documented less clearly than at the platforms above. Cashier cost is one factor and the smaller one at these prices. How a platform records and settles activity affects your experience considerably more than a few cents of gas. BEP20 Against the Alternatives Worth placing honestly, because several chains now cluster at the cheap end. BNB Chain, Solana, Litecoin and TON all deliver sub-cent or near-sub-cent transfers with quick settlement. None of them is dramatically better than the others for a casino deposit, and choosing between them mostly comes down to which asset you already hold and which network your platform credits. Where BEP-20 has an edge is familiarity: EVM addresses you already recognise from Ethereum MetaMask compatibility without configuring anything unusual ERC-20 style tooling, so nothing new to learn, without Ethereum's fees That counts for more than a fractional cost difference, especially if you are still building confidence with crypto deposits and want to avoid the platforms that exploit inexperience. Confirm what is legal where you live, keep stakes within a set budget, and play only if you are of legal age, since KYC or AML checks may apply. Responsible gambling connects to low-cost rails directly, because a deposit costing half a cent carries no friction at all, and friction is often the only thing that makes a person pause before repeating one.     Disclaimer: The information here is provided for general purposes only and is not legal, tax, investment, or financial advice. Network fees, block times and platform terms change, so confirm current details before transferring. Crypto transfers are irreversible. Betting carries risk, and rules vary by country, so check the law where you live. Please gamble responsibly, within your means, and only if you are of legal age.

BEP20 on a Budget: 5 BNB Chain Casinos Compared on Deposit Cost

A BEP20 casino deposit is now among the least expensive available, and BNB Chain got there quietly to fund a casino account, and it did it by cutting block times three times in eighteen months. A transfer now costs about half a cent and confirms in under a second.
Here is where that cost comes from, the choice that used to go wrong and no longer can, and where to spend it.
Why a BEP20 Transfer Costs So Little
Five things stack up, and the first is the one that did most of the work.
The network standardised on 0.05 gwei. BNB Chain's own documentation puts the standard gas price there, which produces typical transaction fees around $0.005 or less. That is a network-wide convention, not a temporary market condition.
Block time fell to roughly 0.45 seconds. Three consecutive hardforks did it: Lorentz, Maxwell, and Fermi took the chain from three seconds down to under half a second. Faster blocks mean less queuing and less fee pressure.
Capacity outruns demand. With blocks arriving twice a second, the chain rarely fills, so the auction dynamic that pushes Ethereum fees up has little room to operate.
It is EVM-compatible without Ethereum's congestion. BEP-20 is a direct adaptation of ERC-20, so tooling and address formats are familiar, without inheriting the fee market that comes with them.
Real-world cost lands between half a cent and five cents. Third-party tracking through 2025 and 2026 puts typical transfers in the $0.01 to $0.05 range depending on token and contract complexity, which is the figure to plan around instead of the theoretical floor.
Exchanges and platforms typically credit BEP-20 deposits in under two minutes, so the practical experience is quick and inexpensive without needing you to configure anything.
The Network Choice That Used to Catch People
This one is worth knowing because outdated guides still warn about it.
BNB used to exist across two standards. BEP-2 belonged to the old Beacon Chain and BEP-20 to BNB Smart Chain, and choosing the wrong one sent funds somewhere the recipient could not reach. It was a genuine source of lost deposits for years.
BEP-2 retired with Beacon Chain in 2024 and its assets migrated across. So in 2026, when a cashier asks which BNB network to use, the answer is effectively always BNB Smart Chain, BEP-20. The old failure mode has been removed by decommissioning the thing that caused it.
One requirement remains. Gas in BNB is the requirement here, so moving a BEP-20 token means holding a small BNB balance for gas.
Arriving with only USDT and no BNB leaves you looking at a balance you cannot send, which is the same pattern as ETH on Ethereum. At half a cent per transaction, a dollar of BNB covers an enormous amount of activity.
Five Platforms Crediting BEP20
All five accept BNB Chain deposits, which matters because the chain hosts one of the largest USDT supplies in circulation. Ordered on what the cashier adds above network cost.
Dexsport adds nothing above the network fee, so a BEP-20 deposit costs you what BNB Chain charges. It runs a multi-coin, multi-network cashier with BNB Chain among the supported networks, and being non-custodial means a settled balance sits in a wallet you hold instead of behind a withdrawal threshold. The licence is Anjouan, lighter than Curacao or Malta, and restricted territories cover the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia.
Stake credits BEP-20 across a large cashier with per-asset withdrawal minimums published, which is the figure deciding whether a small balance can leave. Balances are custodial.
BC.Game offers comparable breadth under a long Curacao trading record, with BNB Chain among the standard rails and clearly documented minimums.
Vave supports BEP-20 within multi-coin funding across several chains, with a solid third-party catalogue and no originals suite.
Mega Dice accepts BNB Chain deposits through a Telegram-first flow, though withdrawal terms are documented less clearly than at the platforms above.
Cashier cost is one factor and the smaller one at these prices. How a platform records and settles activity affects your experience considerably more than a few cents of gas.
BEP20 Against the Alternatives
Worth placing honestly, because several chains now cluster at the cheap end.
BNB Chain, Solana, Litecoin and TON all deliver sub-cent or near-sub-cent transfers with quick settlement. None of them is dramatically better than the others for a casino deposit, and choosing between them mostly comes down to which asset you already hold and which network your platform credits.
Where BEP-20 has an edge is familiarity:
EVM addresses you already recognise from Ethereum
MetaMask compatibility without configuring anything unusual
ERC-20 style tooling, so nothing new to learn, without Ethereum's fees That counts for more than a fractional cost difference, especially if you are still building confidence with crypto deposits and want to avoid the platforms that exploit inexperience.
Confirm what is legal where you live, keep stakes within a set budget, and play only if you are of legal age, since KYC or AML checks may apply.
Responsible gambling connects to low-cost rails directly, because a deposit costing half a cent carries no friction at all, and friction is often the only thing that makes a person pause before repeating one.


Disclaimer: The information here is provided for general purposes only and is not legal, tax, investment, or financial advice. Network fees, block times and platform terms change, so confirm current details before transferring. Crypto transfers are irreversible. Betting carries risk, and rules vary by country, so check the law where you live. Please gamble responsibly, within your means, and only if you are of legal age.
·
--
Verificado
Snowflake supera el 20% tras la demanda de IA y eleva la previsión de ingresos por productos para el FY2027 a 6.07BSegún Reuters a través de Investing.com, las acciones de Snowflake subieron más de un 20% en operaciones fuera del horario habitual el 2 de septiembre, después de que la empresa de datos en la nube superara las expectativas de resultados y elevara su previsión de ingresos por productos para el año fiscal 2027 a 6.07 mil millones de dólares. Las ganancias ajustadas fueron de 0.62 dólares por acción, frente al consenso de analistas de 0.45 dólares compilado por LSEG. Snowflake informó una aceleración en la adopción de sus ofertas de IA, incluidos sus productos CoCo y CoWork. El objetivo de ingresos por productos para el año fiscal 2027 sube a 6.07 mil millones de dólares Snowflake elevó su objetivo de ingresos por productos para el año fiscal 2027 de 5.84 mil millones de dólares a 6.07 mil millones de dólares. El nuevo objetivo implica un crecimiento interanual del 36%, según el informe de la SEC del 2 de septiembre de la empresa.

Snowflake supera el 20% tras la demanda de IA y eleva la previsión de ingresos por productos para el FY2027 a 6.07B

Según Reuters a través de Investing.com, las acciones de Snowflake subieron más de un 20% en operaciones fuera del horario habitual el 2 de septiembre, después de que la empresa de datos en la nube superara las expectativas de resultados y elevara su previsión de ingresos por productos para el año fiscal 2027 a 6.07 mil millones de dólares. Las ganancias ajustadas fueron de 0.62 dólares por acción, frente al consenso de analistas de 0.45 dólares compilado por LSEG. Snowflake informó una aceleración en la adopción de sus ofertas de IA, incluidos sus productos CoCo y CoWork.
El objetivo de ingresos por productos para el año fiscal 2027 sube a 6.07 mil millones de dólares
Snowflake elevó su objetivo de ingresos por productos para el año fiscal 2027 de 5.84 mil millones de dólares a 6.07 mil millones de dólares. El nuevo objetivo implica un crecimiento interanual del 36%, según el informe de la SEC del 2 de septiembre de la empresa.
·
--
Telegram-First Play: 4 Casinos TON que vale la pena mirarTON tuvo un 2026 inusual. En abril, una actualización de consenso redujo la liquidación de alrededor de diez segundos a aproximadamente uno. En mayo, Telegram anunció que asumiría el control como el validador más grande de la red, y las comisiones cayeron cerca de seis veces. Para cualquiera que ya vive en Telegram, esa combinación cambia cómo se ve la financiación de una cuenta de casino. Qué cambió realmente este año Tres avances, y se potencian entre sí. Catchain 2.0 se lanzó el 9 de abril de 2026. Los tiempos de bloque bajaron de unos 2,5 segundos a unos 400 milisegundos, la liquidación de transacciones se desplomó de alrededor de diez segundos a aproximadamente uno, y el rendimiento aumentó alrededor de diez veces. Ahora TON publica una finalización de menos de un segundo, de 0,6 segundos, lo que lo sitúa en la misma categoría que las cadenas de producción más rápidas.

Telegram-First Play: 4 Casinos TON que vale la pena mirar

TON tuvo un 2026 inusual. En abril, una actualización de consenso redujo la liquidación de alrededor de diez segundos a aproximadamente uno. En mayo, Telegram anunció que asumiría el control como el validador más grande de la red, y las comisiones cayeron cerca de seis veces.
Para cualquiera que ya vive en Telegram, esa combinación cambia cómo se ve la financiación de una cuenta de casino.
Qué cambió realmente este año
Tres avances, y se potencian entre sí.
Catchain 2.0 se lanzó el 9 de abril de 2026. Los tiempos de bloque bajaron de unos 2,5 segundos a unos 400 milisegundos, la liquidación de transacciones se desplomó de alrededor de diez segundos a aproximadamente uno, y el rendimiento aumentó alrededor de diez veces. Ahora TON publica una finalización de menos de un segundo, de 0,6 segundos, lo que lo sitúa en la misma categoría que las cadenas de producción más rápidas.
·
--
Los depósitos de XRP necesitan una etiqueta: 4 casinos cripto que aceptan RippleXRP se liquida en tres a cinco segundos por una fracción de un centavo, sin que haga falta el conteo de confirmaciones que exigen otras cadenas. Un depósito en un casino de XRP está cerca de ser un carril ideal y lleva un requisito que hace tropezar a más personas que cualquier otra moneda combinada. La etiqueta de destino. He aquí por qué existe y qué sucede cuando te olvidas de ella. Por qué XRP funciona de manera diferente El XRP Ledger permite que una sola dirección sirva a muchos clientes. Las plataformas lo aprovechan: en lugar de generar una cartera nueva para cada jugador, la mayoría emite una única dirección de depósito compartida e identifica las cuentas individuales mediante una etiqueta numérica adjunta a cada pago.

Los depósitos de XRP necesitan una etiqueta: 4 casinos cripto que aceptan Ripple

XRP se liquida en tres a cinco segundos por una fracción de un centavo, sin que haga falta el conteo de confirmaciones que exigen otras cadenas. Un depósito en un casino de XRP está cerca de ser un carril ideal y lleva un requisito que hace tropezar a más personas que cualquier otra moneda combinada.
La etiqueta de destino. He aquí por qué existe y qué sucede cuando te olvidas de ella.
Por qué XRP funciona de manera diferente
El XRP Ledger permite que una sola dirección sirva a muchos clientes. Las plataformas lo aprovechan: en lugar de generar una cartera nueva para cada jugador, la mayoría emite una única dirección de depósito compartida e identifica las cuentas individuales mediante una etiqueta numérica adjunta a cada pago.
·
--
Solo cuatro barcos cruzan Hormuz mientras el Brent se mantiene por encima de 95Solo cuatro buques de carga atravesaron el Estrecho de Hormuz el miércoles en los datos preliminares de envío, por debajo de los 10 del día anterior y por debajo del promedio de 10 días de alrededor de 13. La cifra llamó la atención incluso cuando los futuros del crudo Brent se mantuvieron por encima de 95 dólares por barril, subrayando el enfoque del mercado en el riesgo en una vía fluvial que transportaba aproximadamente una quinta parte del consumo mundial de petróleo antes del conflicto. Resumen de datos Cambio periódico actual/anterior del metric a la vista a partir de Fuente Futuros del crudo Brent$95,2 por barril—cayó 43 centavos, o 0,45% a las 00:29 GMT el jueves 3 de septiembre de 2026Reuters vía Investing.comFuturos del crudo West Texas Intermediate$90,77 por barril—bajó 24 centavos, o 0,26% a las 00:29 GMT el jueves 3 de septiembre de 2026Reuters vía Investing.comBuques de carga que transitan el Estrecho de Hormuzcuatro buques de carga10 buques de carga al día anterior—miércoles; datos preliminares de envíos 3 de septiembre de 2026Reuters vía Investing.comPromedio de diez días de tránsitos de buques de carga a través de Hormuzalrededor de 13——promedio de 10 días3 de septiembre de 2026Reuters vía Investing.comPetróleo que transita el Estrecho de Hormuz17 millones de barriles——lunes3 de septiembre de 2026Reuters vía Investing.com

Solo cuatro barcos cruzan Hormuz mientras el Brent se mantiene por encima de 95

Solo cuatro buques de carga atravesaron el Estrecho de Hormuz el miércoles en los datos preliminares de envío, por debajo de los 10 del día anterior y por debajo del promedio de 10 días de alrededor de 13. La cifra llamó la atención incluso cuando los futuros del crudo Brent se mantuvieron por encima de 95 dólares por barril, subrayando el enfoque del mercado en el riesgo en una vía fluvial que transportaba aproximadamente una quinta parte del consumo mundial de petróleo antes del conflicto.
Resumen de datos
Cambio periódico actual/anterior del metric a la vista a partir de Fuente Futuros del crudo Brent$95,2 por barril—cayó 43 centavos, o 0,45% a las 00:29 GMT el jueves 3 de septiembre de 2026Reuters vía Investing.comFuturos del crudo West Texas Intermediate$90,77 por barril—bajó 24 centavos, o 0,26% a las 00:29 GMT el jueves 3 de septiembre de 2026Reuters vía Investing.comBuques de carga que transitan el Estrecho de Hormuzcuatro buques de carga10 buques de carga al día anterior—miércoles; datos preliminares de envíos 3 de septiembre de 2026Reuters vía Investing.comPromedio de diez días de tránsitos de buques de carga a través de Hormuzalrededor de 13——promedio de 10 días3 de septiembre de 2026Reuters vía Investing.comPetróleo que transita el Estrecho de Hormuz17 millones de barriles——lunes3 de septiembre de 2026Reuters vía Investing.com
·
--
Eightco Holdings (NASDAQ: ORBS) Informa un Total de Tenencias de Aproximadamente $380 Millones, Incluye Op...Composición de la tesorería de Eightco al 2 de septiembre de 2026: $90M en acciones de OpenAI (indirectas), $18M en acciones de Beast Industries, 16,278 ETH, casi 302 millones de tenencias de WLD, y $122M en efectivo y equivalentes, con un total aproximado de $380 millones Eightco recientemente recompró más de 25 millones de acciones ordinarias en el último mes bajo su programa de recompra de acciones previamente anunciado de $125 millones Eightco participó anteriormente en la ronda de financiación de $52.5M de World Foundation, liderada por Pantera con la participación de Bain Capital Crypto, Selini Capital, Susquehanna Crypto y otros inversores

Eightco Holdings (NASDAQ: ORBS) Informa un Total de Tenencias de Aproximadamente $380 Millones, Incluye Op...

Composición de la tesorería de Eightco al 2 de septiembre de 2026: $90M en acciones de OpenAI (indirectas), $18M en acciones de Beast Industries, 16,278 ETH, casi 302 millones de tenencias de WLD, y $122M en efectivo y equivalentes, con un total aproximado de $380 millones
Eightco recientemente recompró más de 25 millones de acciones ordinarias en el último mes bajo su programa de recompra de acciones previamente anunciado de $125 millones
Eightco participó anteriormente en la ronda de financiación de $52.5M de World Foundation, liderada por Pantera con la participación de Bain Capital Crypto, Selini Capital, Susquehanna Crypto y otros inversores
·
--
Ver traducción
Core DAO Prepares Emergency Fork After Validators Claim Excess CORE RewardsCore DAO said on Sept. 2 that it had contained an excess validator-reward issue, preventing malicious validators from drawing further rewards, and was coordinating an emergency hard fork. The planned change will be a forward upgrade rather than a rollback, according to the network's announcement. Core DAO says excess-reward claims are contained The update is the most concrete indication so far that the protocol has stopped the additional reward claims at the center of the incident. Core DAO did not provide a deployment date, implementation details or a timetable for the emergency hard fork in its Sept. 2 statement. By characterizing the fork as forward-only, the DAO distinguished the planned upgrade from a chain rollback. Its statement did not say how the upgrade would address rewards that had already accrued. The undisclosed excess CORE supply Core DAO first disclosed the issue on Aug. 31, saying that a small number of validators had accrued rewards above the protocol's intended issuance. It said at the time that user assets, network security and fund custody were unaffected. The key supply questions remain unanswered. Cointelegraph reported on Sept. 2 that Core DAO had not disclosed the amount of excess CORE issued, the duration of the activity or whether the tokens had entered circulation. Those omissions limit an assessment of the incident's effect on token supply even as the DAO says further claims have been halted. Validator rewards combine minted CORE and transaction fees The issuance question matters because validator compensation is not limited to transaction fees. Core's validator documentation says rewards include newly minted CORE and fees, with 90% allocated to validators and 10% sent to the System Reward Contract. Core DAO has not publicly quantified how the rewards accrued by the affected validators compared with the protocol's intended issuance. Coinbase had temporarily paused CORE sends and receives On Aug. 30, Coinbase temporarily paused CORE sends and receives on the Core DAO network, according to its status page, which listed the incident as “Paused Sends/Receives - Core DAO Network.” Coinbase said CORE buys, sells, conversions and fiat transactions were unaffected. The status information supports a transfer disruption but does not show whether it was directly linked to the validator-reward issue or when service resumed. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Core DAO Prepares Emergency Fork After Validators Claim Excess CORE Rewards

Core DAO said on Sept. 2 that it had contained an excess validator-reward issue, preventing malicious validators from drawing further rewards, and was coordinating an emergency hard fork. The planned change will be a forward upgrade rather than a rollback, according to the network's announcement.
Core DAO says excess-reward claims are contained
The update is the most concrete indication so far that the protocol has stopped the additional reward claims at the center of the incident. Core DAO did not provide a deployment date, implementation details or a timetable for the emergency hard fork in its Sept. 2 statement.
By characterizing the fork as forward-only, the DAO distinguished the planned upgrade from a chain rollback. Its statement did not say how the upgrade would address rewards that had already accrued.
The undisclosed excess CORE supply
Core DAO first disclosed the issue on Aug. 31, saying that a small number of validators had accrued rewards above the protocol's intended issuance. It said at the time that user assets, network security and fund custody were unaffected.
The key supply questions remain unanswered. Cointelegraph reported on Sept. 2 that Core DAO had not disclosed the amount of excess CORE issued, the duration of the activity or whether the tokens had entered circulation. Those omissions limit an assessment of the incident's effect on token supply even as the DAO says further claims have been halted.
Validator rewards combine minted CORE and transaction fees
The issuance question matters because validator compensation is not limited to transaction fees. Core's validator documentation says rewards include newly minted CORE and fees, with 90% allocated to validators and 10% sent to the System Reward Contract.
Core DAO has not publicly quantified how the rewards accrued by the affected validators compared with the protocol's intended issuance.
Coinbase had temporarily paused CORE sends and receives
On Aug. 30, Coinbase temporarily paused CORE sends and receives on the Core DAO network, according to its status page, which listed the incident as “Paused Sends/Receives - Core DAO Network.” Coinbase said CORE buys, sells, conversions and fiat transactions were unaffected.
The status information supports a transfer disruption but does not show whether it was directly linked to the validator-reward issue or when service resumed.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
·
--
Las empresas de tesorería cripto alcanzan 340.000 millones de dólares mientras los vehículos de ZEC y HYPE superan a sus tokensLas empresas de tesorería cripto valían aproximadamente 340.000 millones de dólares en valor agregado del mercado de capitales a 1 de septiembre de 2026. La comparación más reveladora no es el aumento del 10% desde mediados de agosto, sino los mucho más pequeños 121,4 mil millones de dólares de valor neto de cripto combinado, registrado en 119 empresas dos días antes. Esa diferencia no significa que cada empresa de tesorería esté valorada con generosidad, ni que todo el valor de las acciones sea atribuible a las tenencias de cripto. Más bien, muestra por qué estos vehículos no pueden tratarse como simples sustitutos de tokens. Los inversores del mercado público están valorando reclamaciones sobre balances, futuras rondas de captación de capital, decisiones de la dirección y, en algunos casos, negocios en funcionamiento junto con los propios tokens.

Las empresas de tesorería cripto alcanzan 340.000 millones de dólares mientras los vehículos de ZEC y HYPE superan a sus tokens

Las empresas de tesorería cripto valían aproximadamente 340.000 millones de dólares en valor agregado del mercado de capitales a 1 de septiembre de 2026. La comparación más reveladora no es el aumento del 10% desde mediados de agosto, sino los mucho más pequeños 121,4 mil millones de dólares de valor neto de cripto combinado, registrado en 119 empresas dos días antes.
Esa diferencia no significa que cada empresa de tesorería esté valorada con generosidad, ni que todo el valor de las acciones sea atribuible a las tenencias de cripto. Más bien, muestra por qué estos vehículos no pueden tratarse como simples sustitutos de tokens. Los inversores del mercado público están valorando reclamaciones sobre balances, futuras rondas de captación de capital, decisiones de la dirección y, en algunos casos, negocios en funcionamiento junto con los propios tokens.
·
--
Ver traducción
Binance Opens Options on 1,000 US Stocks and ETFs as TradFi Perpetual Volume Hits $433BBinance on Sept. 1 announced options on more than 1,000 selected U.S. stocks and exchange-traded funds for eligible users outside the United States, expanding its multi-asset product lineup. The contracts are physically settled, so exercised options result in delivery or receipt of the underlying U.S.-listed shares or ETFs. Binance’s 1,000-stock-and-ETF options rollout Binance said Nest Trading Limited will act as introducing broker for the offering, while Alpaca Securities will handle execution, clearing, settlement and custody. Access is limited to eligible users outside the U.S. Eligible retail users can buy calls and puts. Binance said losses on those purchases are capped at the premium paid. Physical settlement distinguishes the product from contracts settled in cash: an exercised option entails receiving or delivering the underlying shares or ETF units. Equity-linked perpetuals led August TradFi activity The options announcement follows a sharp increase in Binance’s reported TradFi perpetual-futures activity. The exchange reported about $433.4 billion in volume during August 2026, roughly 15 times the $29.5 billion it reported for January. Equity-linked perpetuals accounted for about 79% of August TradFi perpetual activity, or approximately $342.9 billion, according to The Block. That compares with $410.9 million in January, underscoring how concentrated the August total was in equity-linked contracts. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Binance Opens Options on 1,000 US Stocks and ETFs as TradFi Perpetual Volume Hits $433B

Binance on Sept. 1 announced options on more than 1,000 selected U.S. stocks and exchange-traded funds for eligible users outside the United States, expanding its multi-asset product lineup. The contracts are physically settled, so exercised options result in delivery or receipt of the underlying U.S.-listed shares or ETFs.
Binance’s 1,000-stock-and-ETF options rollout
Binance said Nest Trading Limited will act as introducing broker for the offering, while Alpaca Securities will handle execution, clearing, settlement and custody. Access is limited to eligible users outside the U.S.
Eligible retail users can buy calls and puts. Binance said losses on those purchases are capped at the premium paid. Physical settlement distinguishes the product from contracts settled in cash: an exercised option entails receiving or delivering the underlying shares or ETF units.
Equity-linked perpetuals led August TradFi activity
The options announcement follows a sharp increase in Binance’s reported TradFi perpetual-futures activity. The exchange reported about $433.4 billion in volume during August 2026, roughly 15 times the $29.5 billion it reported for January.
Equity-linked perpetuals accounted for about 79% of August TradFi perpetual activity, or approximately $342.9 billion, according to The Block. That compares with $410.9 million in January, underscoring how concentrated the August total was in equity-linked contracts.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
·
--
Bitcoin y Oro se Mueven Juntos de Nuevo — pero la Operación de Devaluación Tiene un Punto DébilLa correlación de Bitcoin a 30 días con el oro alcanzó 0,8 a finales de agosto, una alineación inusualmente estrecha entre un activo que aún está moldeado por la infraestructura del mercado cripto y un metal con siglos de historia monetaria. Su correlación móvil a 90 días con el oro también alcanzó un máximo histórico, según The Block. El momento hace que la señal sea menos directa de lo que sugiere la expresión “oro digital”. El rendimiento del Tesoro estadounidense a 10 años indexado a la inflación de la Reserva Federal se situó en 2,42% el 28 de agosto, frente al 1,88% al inicio del año en la serie disponible. Ese es un panorama menos favorable para el oro y el bitcoin por igual: ninguno genera un flujo de ingresos, así que los mayores rendimientos ajustados por inflación de la deuda pública aumentan el costo de mantenerlos.

Bitcoin y Oro se Mueven Juntos de Nuevo — pero la Operación de Devaluación Tiene un Punto Débil

La correlación de Bitcoin a 30 días con el oro alcanzó 0,8 a finales de agosto, una alineación inusualmente estrecha entre un activo que aún está moldeado por la infraestructura del mercado cripto y un metal con siglos de historia monetaria. Su correlación móvil a 90 días con el oro también alcanzó un máximo histórico, según The Block.
El momento hace que la señal sea menos directa de lo que sugiere la expresión “oro digital”. El rendimiento del Tesoro estadounidense a 10 años indexado a la inflación de la Reserva Federal se situó en 2,42% el 28 de agosto, frente al 1,88% al inicio del año en la serie disponible. Ese es un panorama menos favorable para el oro y el bitcoin por igual: ninguno genera un flujo de ingresos, así que los mayores rendimientos ajustados por inflación de la deuda pública aumentan el costo de mantenerlos.
·
--
Ver traducción
DWF Labs Expands Global Regulatory Footprint with BVI Virtual Asset Service Provider ApprovalRoad Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands, September 3rd, 2026, Chainwire DWF Labs, an established, market-tested investor and market maker built to strengthen digital asset market infrastructure at scale, today announced an expansion of its global regulatory footprint with a group entity granted Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) regulatory approval from the British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI FSC). Granted under the BVI's Virtual Assets Service Providers Act 2022, the approval authorizes DWF Labs as a registered VASP, to provide the exchange of one or more forms of virtual assets, as well as to participate in, and provide financial services related to an issuer's offer and/or sale of a virtual asset. The approval enables institutional clients access to DWF Labs’ integrated OTC trading and market making capabilities, including spot trading across thousands of digital assets and stablecoins, through a regulated BVI entity. It also strengthens the company’s ability to deliver investment, incubation and ecosystem development services to support token issuers and digital asset projects on a global scale.  The BVI has established itself as a leading jurisdiction for decentralized ledger deployments and structured real-world asset (RWA) tokenization. The territory now represents nearly 10% of the global tokenization US treasuries market, with $1.5 billion in distributed value. BVI-domiciled entities also facilitate more than $1.2 billion in active, circulating stablecoins - figures underpinned by more than 24,700 stablecoin asset holders and weekly transfer volumes of $694.1 million. These figures (Source: rwa.xyz treasuries and stablecoins) reflect the strength of both the regulatory and market infrastructure DWF Labs is now positioned to operate within.  Heng Lee, Managing Director and Partner at DWF Labs said, “The Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) approval from the British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI FSC) is a key step in responsibly expanding and delivering DWF Labs’ regulated digital asset services to international institutional clients.”  “As the digital asset market and industry continue to mature, and adoption increases, this addition to our regulatory framework will enable us to deliver a broader range of solutions, products, and services, while reinforcing our focus upon transparency and governance.” DWF Labs will continue to expand its regulatory footprint across key global markets, supporting its international growth strategy and commitment to operating within robust regulatory frameworks. About DWF Labs Established in 2022, DWF Labs is an investor and market maker, focused on giving builders the capital, liquidity, expertise, and partnerships needed to take ideas from concept to scale. DWF Labs is among the world's largest high-frequency digital asset trading organizations, active on more than 80 centralized and decentralized exchanges. The firm supports over 20% of CoinMarketCap's Top 100 projects and 35% of its Top 1,000, and has worked with more than 1,000 blockchain companies across Layer 1 and Layer 2 networks, DeFi, gaming, AI, payments, infrastructure, and tokenization. The firm's work is organized across four business lines: Liquidity (institutional market making and liquidity provision), Investment and Incubation (strategic capital and token advisory for emerging projects), Ecosystem Development (go-to-market support), and OTC and Structured Markets (tailored trading solutions for institutions, funds, and protocol treasuries). DWF Labs also founded and incubated Falcon Finance, a synthetic dollar and universal collateralization protocol. DWF Labs operates a globally distributed team on a 24/7/365 basis.  For more information, visit www.dwf-labs.com, or follow DWF Labs on X, LinkedIn, and Telegram. ContactDWF Labspress@dwf-labs.com Disclaimer: This is a sponsored press release and is for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Bitzo, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.

DWF Labs Expands Global Regulatory Footprint with BVI Virtual Asset Service Provider Approval

Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands, September 3rd, 2026, Chainwire
DWF Labs, an established, market-tested investor and market maker built to strengthen digital asset market infrastructure at scale, today announced an expansion of its global regulatory footprint with a group entity granted Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) regulatory approval from the British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI FSC).
Granted under the BVI's Virtual Assets Service Providers Act 2022, the approval authorizes DWF Labs as a registered VASP, to provide the exchange of one or more forms of virtual assets, as well as to participate in, and provide financial services related to an issuer's offer and/or sale of a virtual asset.
The approval enables institutional clients access to DWF Labs’ integrated OTC trading and market making capabilities, including spot trading across thousands of digital assets and stablecoins, through a regulated BVI entity. It also strengthens the company’s ability to deliver investment, incubation and ecosystem development services to support token issuers and digital asset projects on a global scale.
The BVI has established itself as a leading jurisdiction for decentralized ledger deployments and structured real-world asset (RWA) tokenization. The territory now represents nearly 10% of the global tokenization US treasuries market, with $1.5 billion in distributed value. BVI-domiciled entities also facilitate more than $1.2 billion in active, circulating stablecoins - figures underpinned by more than 24,700 stablecoin asset holders and weekly transfer volumes of $694.1 million. These figures (Source: rwa.xyz treasuries and stablecoins) reflect the strength of both the regulatory and market infrastructure DWF Labs is now positioned to operate within.
Heng Lee, Managing Director and Partner at DWF Labs said, “The Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) approval from the British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI FSC) is a key step in responsibly expanding and delivering DWF Labs’ regulated digital asset services to international institutional clients.”
“As the digital asset market and industry continue to mature, and adoption increases, this addition to our regulatory framework will enable us to deliver a broader range of solutions, products, and services, while reinforcing our focus upon transparency and governance.”
DWF Labs will continue to expand its regulatory footprint across key global markets, supporting its international growth strategy and commitment to operating within robust regulatory frameworks.
About DWF Labs
Established in 2022, DWF Labs is an investor and market maker, focused on giving builders the capital, liquidity, expertise, and partnerships needed to take ideas from concept to scale. DWF Labs is among the world's largest high-frequency digital asset trading organizations, active on more than 80 centralized and decentralized exchanges. The firm supports over 20% of CoinMarketCap's Top 100 projects and 35% of its Top 1,000, and has worked with more than 1,000 blockchain companies across Layer 1 and Layer 2 networks, DeFi, gaming, AI, payments, infrastructure, and tokenization.
The firm's work is organized across four business lines: Liquidity (institutional market making and liquidity provision), Investment and Incubation (strategic capital and token advisory for emerging projects), Ecosystem Development (go-to-market support), and OTC and Structured Markets (tailored trading solutions for institutions, funds, and protocol treasuries). DWF Labs also founded and incubated Falcon Finance, a synthetic dollar and universal collateralization protocol.
DWF Labs operates a globally distributed team on a 24/7/365 basis.
For more information, visit www.dwf-labs.com, or follow DWF Labs on X, LinkedIn, and Telegram.
ContactDWF Labspress@dwf-labs.com
Disclaimer: This is a sponsored press release and is for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Bitzo, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.
·
--
Hyperliquid Agrega Trading con RFQ para Acciones Tokenizadas mientras la Liquidez de xStocks se Mueve en CadenaSilhouette dijo el 1 de septiembre que su sistema de solicitud de cotización, o RFQ, había entrado en funcionamiento en la red principal de Hyperliquid, al principio con valores tokenizados de xStocks. El lanzamiento ofrece a los traders una forma de solicitar precios competitivos a los creadores de mercado y liquidar la operación seleccionada en cadena, creando una nueva ruta de liquidez para acciones tokenizadas más allá de los libros de órdenes spot existentes de Hyperliquid. xStocks es el marco de valores tokenizados de Payward. El despliegue de la RFQ es importante porque los activos admitidos pueden volverse negociables mediante cotizaciones de los creadores de mercado antes de que tengan un mercado dedicado en HyperCore, la capa de trading de Hyperliquid.

Hyperliquid Agrega Trading con RFQ para Acciones Tokenizadas mientras la Liquidez de xStocks se Mueve en Cadena

Silhouette dijo el 1 de septiembre que su sistema de solicitud de cotización, o RFQ, había entrado en funcionamiento en la red principal de Hyperliquid, al principio con valores tokenizados de xStocks. El lanzamiento ofrece a los traders una forma de solicitar precios competitivos a los creadores de mercado y liquidar la operación seleccionada en cadena, creando una nueva ruta de liquidez para acciones tokenizadas más allá de los libros de órdenes spot existentes de Hyperliquid.
xStocks es el marco de valores tokenizados de Payward. El despliegue de la RFQ es importante porque los activos admitidos pueden volverse negociables mediante cotizaciones de los creadores de mercado antes de que tengan un mercado dedicado en HyperCore, la capa de trading de Hyperliquid.
·
--
Ver traducción
Prediction Market Volume Falls 14.5% to $45.33B in August, Ending a Year of Monthly GrowthCombined monthly volume at Kalshi, Polymarket and Polymarket US fell 14.5% to $45.33 billion in August, the first decline since August 2025. The reading ended a year-long run of monthly growth after summer activity accelerated around the World Cup. The figure tracks taker notional volume in U.S. dollars across the three venues, according to The Block Data's dashboard methodology. The August pullback was uneven, with Kalshi posting a substantially smaller decline than Polymarket and Polymarket US combined. Data Snapshot MetricCurrentPreviousChangePeriodAs ofSourceCombined monthly volume at Kalshi, Polymarket and Polymarket US$45.33 billion—fell 14.5%August 2026September 2, 2026The BlockKalshi volume$37.17 billion$40.1 billiondown 7.3%August 2026 vs. July 2026September 2, 2026The BlockPolymarket and Polymarket US combined volume$8.16 billion$12.89 billiondown 36.7%August 2026 vs. July 2026September 2, 2026The BlockCombined prediction-market volume$25.66 billion——May 2026September 2, 2026The Block Kalshi accounted for most August volume Kalshi recorded $37.17 billion in August volume, down 7.3% from $40.1 billion in July, according to The Block. It was the largest contributor to the $45.33 billion combined total. Polymarket and Polymarket US combined for $8.16 billion, down from $12.89 billion in July and representing a 36.7% decline. That contraction was substantially steeper than Kalshi's, concentrating more of the combined measure's August decrease in the two Polymarket venues. The figures use the same measure—taker notional volume in U.S. dollars across the three venues—according to The Block Data's dashboard methodology, and are components of one combined monthly total rather than separate estimates based on different volume definitions. Kalshi and Polymarket's combined volume falls 15% in August, first monthly decline in a year — Source: The Block World Cup activity preceded the pullback The World Cup ran from June 11 to July 19 and helped drive a summer spike in prediction-market activity. When the tournament concluded, combined monthly volume at Kalshi, Polymarket and Polymarket US fell 14.5% in August to $45.33 billion. It was the first monthly decline since August 2025. August nevertheless remained above May's $25.66 billion, leaving activity higher than it was earlier in the year. State scrutiny of sports-related contracts State regulators in the U.S. are intensifying scrutiny of Kalshi and Polymarket, especially over sports-related contracts. The Block reports that more than a dozen states have taken enforcement action or filed lawsuits against the companies. The available volume data do not show that those actions caused August’s decline, which followed a World Cup-driven summer spike in prediction-market activity. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Prediction Market Volume Falls 14.5% to $45.33B in August, Ending a Year of Monthly Growth

Combined monthly volume at Kalshi, Polymarket and Polymarket US fell 14.5% to $45.33 billion in August, the first decline since August 2025. The reading ended a year-long run of monthly growth after summer activity accelerated around the World Cup.
The figure tracks taker notional volume in U.S. dollars across the three venues, according to The Block Data's dashboard methodology. The August pullback was uneven, with Kalshi posting a substantially smaller decline than Polymarket and Polymarket US combined.
Data Snapshot
MetricCurrentPreviousChangePeriodAs ofSourceCombined monthly volume at Kalshi, Polymarket and Polymarket US$45.33 billion—fell 14.5%August 2026September 2, 2026The BlockKalshi volume$37.17 billion$40.1 billiondown 7.3%August 2026 vs. July 2026September 2, 2026The BlockPolymarket and Polymarket US combined volume$8.16 billion$12.89 billiondown 36.7%August 2026 vs. July 2026September 2, 2026The BlockCombined prediction-market volume$25.66 billion——May 2026September 2, 2026The Block
Kalshi accounted for most August volume
Kalshi recorded $37.17 billion in August volume, down 7.3% from $40.1 billion in July, according to The Block. It was the largest contributor to the $45.33 billion combined total.
Polymarket and Polymarket US combined for $8.16 billion, down from $12.89 billion in July and representing a 36.7% decline. That contraction was substantially steeper than Kalshi's, concentrating more of the combined measure's August decrease in the two Polymarket venues.
The figures use the same measure—taker notional volume in U.S. dollars across the three venues—according to The Block Data's dashboard methodology, and are components of one combined monthly total rather than separate estimates based on different volume definitions.
Kalshi and Polymarket's combined volume falls 15% in August, first monthly decline in a year — Source: The Block
World Cup activity preceded the pullback
The World Cup ran from June 11 to July 19 and helped drive a summer spike in prediction-market activity.
When the tournament concluded, combined monthly volume at Kalshi, Polymarket and Polymarket US fell 14.5% in August to $45.33 billion. It was the first monthly decline since August 2025.
August nevertheless remained above May's $25.66 billion, leaving activity higher than it was earlier in the year.
State scrutiny of sports-related contracts
State regulators in the U.S. are intensifying scrutiny of Kalshi and Polymarket, especially over sports-related contracts. The Block reports that more than a dozen states have taken enforcement action or filed lawsuits against the companies.
The available volume data do not show that those actions caused August’s decline, which followed a World Cup-driven summer spike in prediction-market activity.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
·
--
Los ingresos de Robinhood Chain alcanzan 1,9M USD en 24 horas mientras ARB se dispara 30%Robinhood Chain generó 1,92 millones de dólares en ingresos en las 24 horas hasta el 1 de septiembre de 2026, el mayor de cualquier blockchain, según CoinDesk. ARB subió más de 30% hasta alrededor de 11 centavos mientras el volumen de operaciones alcanzó 618 millones de dólares, un aumento ocho veces mayor que el día anterior. La relativamente nueva cadena dedicada de Arbitrum no enruta ese ingreso neto del protocolo directamente a los titulares de ARB: se comparte con la tesorería del ArbitrumDAO y la Arbitrum Developer Guild. Instantánea de datos MetricCurrentPreviousChangePeriodAs ofSourceRobinhood Chain revenue$1.92 million——past 24 hoursSeptember 1, 2026CoinDeskArbitrum ARB price performancemore than 30%——past 24 hoursSeptember 1, 2026CoinDeskRobinhood Chain revenue$5.92 million——30 daysSeptember 1, 2026CoinDeskArbitrumDAO receipts from Robinhood Chain$175,612——past 24 hoursSeptember 1, 2026CoinDeskARB trading volume$618 million——past 24 hoursSeptember 1, 2026CoinDesk

Los ingresos de Robinhood Chain alcanzan 1,9M USD en 24 horas mientras ARB se dispara 30%

Robinhood Chain generó 1,92 millones de dólares en ingresos en las 24 horas hasta el 1 de septiembre de 2026, el mayor de cualquier blockchain, según CoinDesk. ARB subió más de 30% hasta alrededor de 11 centavos mientras el volumen de operaciones alcanzó 618 millones de dólares, un aumento ocho veces mayor que el día anterior.
La relativamente nueva cadena dedicada de Arbitrum no enruta ese ingreso neto del protocolo directamente a los titulares de ARB: se comparte con la tesorería del ArbitrumDAO y la Arbitrum Developer Guild.
Instantánea de datos
MetricCurrentPreviousChangePeriodAs ofSourceRobinhood Chain revenue$1.92 million——past 24 hoursSeptember 1, 2026CoinDeskArbitrum ARB price performancemore than 30%——past 24 hoursSeptember 1, 2026CoinDeskRobinhood Chain revenue$5.92 million——30 daysSeptember 1, 2026CoinDeskArbitrumDAO receipts from Robinhood Chain$175,612——past 24 hoursSeptember 1, 2026CoinDeskARB trading volume$618 million——past 24 hoursSeptember 1, 2026CoinDesk
·
--
Ver traducción
US Factory PMI Slips to 54.6 as High Input Costs Keep the Fed's Inflation Problem AliveU.S. manufacturing activity expanded for an eighth straight month in August, but the ISM Manufacturing PMI slipped to 54.6 percent from 55.6 percent in July, a decrease of 1 percentage point. The slower headline reading came as the Prices Index held at 71.1 percent, leaving evidence of sustained raw-material cost pressure even as factory growth cooled. Data Snapshot MetricCurrentPreviousChangePeriodAs ofSourceISM Manufacturing PMI54.6 percent55.6 percenta decrease of 1 percentage pointAugust 2026 versus July 2026September 1, 2026Institute for Supply ManagementNew Orders Index53.7 percent56.7 percentdown 3 percentage pointsAugust 2026 versus July 2026September 1, 2026Institute for Supply ManagementPrices Index71.1 percent71.1 percentthe same reading as JulyAugust 2026 versus July 2026September 1, 2026Institute for Supply ManagementSupplier Deliveries Index59.3 percent58.9 percentup 0.4 percentage pointAugust 2026 versus July 2026September 1, 2026Institute for Supply ManagementEmployment Index51.2 percent52.8 percentdown 1.6 percentage pointsAugust 2026 versus July 2026September 1, 2026Institute for Supply Management August PMI falls as new orders and employment cool The August PMI reading marked the sector’s eighth consecutive month of expansion, while ISM said the broader economy continued expanding for the 22nd consecutive month based on the manufacturing reading. New orders also remained in expansion for an eighth consecutive month, although the New Orders Index fell to 53.7 percent in August from 56.7 percent in July, a decline of 3 percentage points. The Employment Index fell to 51.2 percent from 52.8 percent, down 1.6 percentage points. Prices Index holds at 71.1 percent as deliveries slow Raw-material prices increased for the 23rd straight month, according to ISM, which cited steel, aluminum, tariffs and petroleum-based products as drivers. The Prices Index itself held at 71.1 percent in August, unchanged from July. Deliveries moved in the opposite direction: the Supplier Deliveries Index rose 0.4 percentage point, to 59.3 percent from 58.9 percent. ISM says readings above 50 percent indicate slower deliveries. With both the headline Manufacturing PMI and New Orders Index down from July, the data show continuing pressure in manufacturing supply chains despite the unchanged Prices Index reading. Factory input prices and PCE measure different things The ISM Prices Index is a diffusion measure tracking changes in raw-material prices among manufacturing respondents, rather than a 12-month measure of prices paid by consumers. It therefore cannot be directly compared with the Federal Reserve’s personal consumption expenditures, or PCE, inflation gauge. Still, the survey arrives against an inflation backdrop that remains above the Federal Open Market Committee’s target. The Federal Reserve reported that PCE inflation rose 4.1 percent over the 12 months ending in May 2026, above the FOMC’s 2 percent target. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

US Factory PMI Slips to 54.6 as High Input Costs Keep the Fed's Inflation Problem Alive

U.S. manufacturing activity expanded for an eighth straight month in August, but the ISM Manufacturing PMI slipped to 54.6 percent from 55.6 percent in July, a decrease of 1 percentage point. The slower headline reading came as the Prices Index held at 71.1 percent, leaving evidence of sustained raw-material cost pressure even as factory growth cooled.
Data Snapshot
MetricCurrentPreviousChangePeriodAs ofSourceISM Manufacturing PMI54.6 percent55.6 percenta decrease of 1 percentage pointAugust 2026 versus July 2026September 1, 2026Institute for Supply ManagementNew Orders Index53.7 percent56.7 percentdown 3 percentage pointsAugust 2026 versus July 2026September 1, 2026Institute for Supply ManagementPrices Index71.1 percent71.1 percentthe same reading as JulyAugust 2026 versus July 2026September 1, 2026Institute for Supply ManagementSupplier Deliveries Index59.3 percent58.9 percentup 0.4 percentage pointAugust 2026 versus July 2026September 1, 2026Institute for Supply ManagementEmployment Index51.2 percent52.8 percentdown 1.6 percentage pointsAugust 2026 versus July 2026September 1, 2026Institute for Supply Management
August PMI falls as new orders and employment cool
The August PMI reading marked the sector’s eighth consecutive month of expansion, while ISM said the broader economy continued expanding for the 22nd consecutive month based on the manufacturing reading. New orders also remained in expansion for an eighth consecutive month, although the New Orders Index fell to 53.7 percent in August from 56.7 percent in July, a decline of 3 percentage points. The Employment Index fell to 51.2 percent from 52.8 percent, down 1.6 percentage points.
Prices Index holds at 71.1 percent as deliveries slow
Raw-material prices increased for the 23rd straight month, according to ISM, which cited steel, aluminum, tariffs and petroleum-based products as drivers. The Prices Index itself held at 71.1 percent in August, unchanged from July.
Deliveries moved in the opposite direction: the Supplier Deliveries Index rose 0.4 percentage point, to 59.3 percent from 58.9 percent. ISM says readings above 50 percent indicate slower deliveries.
With both the headline Manufacturing PMI and New Orders Index down from July, the data show continuing pressure in manufacturing supply chains despite the unchanged Prices Index reading.
Factory input prices and PCE measure different things
The ISM Prices Index is a diffusion measure tracking changes in raw-material prices among manufacturing respondents, rather than a 12-month measure of prices paid by consumers. It therefore cannot be directly compared with the Federal Reserve’s personal consumption expenditures, or PCE, inflation gauge.
Still, the survey arrives against an inflation backdrop that remains above the Federal Open Market Committee’s target. The Federal Reserve reported that PCE inflation rose 4.1 percent over the 12 months ending in May 2026, above the FOMC’s 2 percent target.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
·
--
El soporte de monedas no es lo mismo que el soporte de red: se comprobaron 6 casinosUna lista de casino con USDT te ha dicho casi nada. USDT no es un solo activo. Existe como tokens separados, mutuamente incompatibles, en una docena de cadenas, y una plataforma que lo acepte puede acreditar solo uno o dos de ellos. Confundir la moneda con la cadena es la forma más común de hacer que la gente pierda un depósito cripto. Aquí está exactamente cómo sucede. Cómo se desarrolla el fallo Seis pasos, y la mayoría de las personas solo se da cuenta en el paso cinco. La lista de monedas muestra un ticker familiar. Ves USDT en la caja y lo lees como un hecho ya confirmado. La interfaz ha respondido a una pregunta sobre el token y todavía no ha dicho nada sobre la red.

El soporte de monedas no es lo mismo que el soporte de red: se comprobaron 6 casinos

Una lista de casino con USDT te ha dicho casi nada. USDT no es un solo activo. Existe como tokens separados, mutuamente incompatibles, en una docena de cadenas, y una plataforma que lo acepte puede acreditar solo uno o dos de ellos.
Confundir la moneda con la cadena es la forma más común de hacer que la gente pierda un depósito cripto. Aquí está exactamente cómo sucede.
Cómo se desarrolla el fallo
Seis pasos, y la mayoría de las personas solo se da cuenta en el paso cinco.
La lista de monedas muestra un ticker familiar. Ves USDT en la caja y lo lees como un hecho ya confirmado. La interfaz ha respondido a una pregunta sobre el token y todavía no ha dicho nada sobre la red.
·
--
USDT en Tron: 5 casinos TRC20 clasificados según el costo en cajaTRC20 se convirtió en el carril predeterminado de USDT porque era barato. En 2026, ya no es cierto de forma fiable, y la mayoría de las personas que financian cuentas de casinos no se han dado cuenta. Así es lo que realmente cuesta un depósito de Tron este año, cómo hacerlo casi gratis y dónde se sitúan ahora las alternativas. Costo actual de cada USDT Rail Costo típico para mover USDT, según las condiciones hasta 2026. Ferrocarril Costo típico de la transferencia Liquidación ERC20 con gas por debajo de 1 gwei Cerca de 2 centavos 15 segundos a 5 minutos TRC20 con energía en staking Casi cero hasta unos 0,20 USD

USDT en Tron: 5 casinos TRC20 clasificados según el costo en caja

TRC20 se convirtió en el carril predeterminado de USDT porque era barato. En 2026, ya no es cierto de forma fiable, y la mayoría de las personas que financian cuentas de casinos no se han dado cuenta.
Así es lo que realmente cuesta un depósito de Tron este año, cómo hacerlo casi gratis y dónde se sitúan ahora las alternativas.
Costo actual de cada USDT Rail
Costo típico para mover USDT, según las condiciones hasta 2026.
Ferrocarril
Costo típico de la transferencia
Liquidación
ERC20 con gas por debajo de 1 gwei
Cerca de 2 centavos
15 segundos a 5 minutos
TRC20 con energía en staking
Casi cero hasta unos 0,20 USD
·
--
ADA en la Caja: 4 Casinos de Cardano y lo que AceptanCardano hace una cosa en la caja que ninguna otra gran cadena hace: te dice la tarifa exacta antes de que envíes. No es una estimación, ni un rango que se mueve mientras la transacción está en una cola. El número. Esa característica vale la pena entenderla, porque elimina un modo de falla que atrapa a la gente en otras redes. Qué Hace Diferente un Depósito de ADA Tres características separan a Cardano de las cadenas que es más probable que hayas usado. Las Tarifas Deterministas Son la Propiedad Definitoria Cardano calcula el costo con una fórmula lineal basada en el tamaño de la transacción; expresado como la tarifa es igual a un multiplicado por el tamaño de la transacción, más b.

ADA en la Caja: 4 Casinos de Cardano y lo que Aceptan

Cardano hace una cosa en la caja que ninguna otra gran cadena hace: te dice la tarifa exacta antes de que envíes. No es una estimación, ni un rango que se mueve mientras la transacción está en una cola. El número.
Esa característica vale la pena entenderla, porque elimina un modo de falla que atrapa a la gente en otras redes.
Qué Hace Diferente un Depósito de ADA
Tres características separan a Cardano de las cadenas que es más probable que hayas usado.
Las Tarifas Deterministas Son la Propiedad Definitoria
Cardano calcula el costo con una fórmula lineal basada en el tamaño de la transacción; expresado como la tarifa es igual a un multiplicado por el tamaño de la transacción, más b.
·
--
El apalancamiento de Bitcoin se reinicia tras una subida del 24% en agosto mientras el interés abierto perpetuo cae a un mínimo de mayoBitcoin ganó un 24,95% en agosto, su mejor mes desde noviembre de 2024, según informó Investing.com. Frente a ese avance, el interés abierto perpetuo medido en BTC cayó un 8,5%. DefiLlama Research sitúa el movimiento en aproximadamente 341.000 BTC antes del avance y alrededor de 312.000 BTC después, a finales de agosto. Las cifras muestran que el fuerte avance del precio no estuvo acompañado por una base mayor de posiciones apalancadas denominadas en Bitcoin. Resumen de datos MétricaActualAnteriorCambioPeriodoAl deFuenteRendimiento de Bitcoin en agosto24,95%——Agosto de 20262026-08-31Investing.comInterés abierto de futuros denominados en Bitcoinaproximadamente 587.600 BTC645.800 BTC—A 25 de agosto frente al 14 de agosto de 20262026-08-25KuCoin FlashInterés abierto perpetuo antes del avance frente al nivel posterioralrededor de 312.000 BTCaproximadamente 341.000 BTCDisminución del 8,5%Agosto de 20262026-09-01DefiLlama ResearchInterés abierto perpetuo en términos de dólarescasi 26.000 millones de dólaresaproximadamente 21,9 mil millones de dólares—Antes del avance hasta el 24 de agosto de 20262026-08-24DefiLlama ResearchInterés abierto de futuros en todo el mercado en términos de monedasaproximadamente 708.000 BTCaproximadamente 737.000 BTCContracción del 3,9%Del 13 de agosto al 25 de agosto de 20262026-08-25Oracle of BTC

El apalancamiento de Bitcoin se reinicia tras una subida del 24% en agosto mientras el interés abierto perpetuo cae a un mínimo de mayo

Bitcoin ganó un 24,95% en agosto, su mejor mes desde noviembre de 2024, según informó Investing.com.
Frente a ese avance, el interés abierto perpetuo medido en BTC cayó un 8,5%. DefiLlama Research sitúa el movimiento en aproximadamente 341.000 BTC antes del avance y alrededor de 312.000 BTC después, a finales de agosto.
Las cifras muestran que el fuerte avance del precio no estuvo acompañado por una base mayor de posiciones apalancadas denominadas en Bitcoin.
Resumen de datos
MétricaActualAnteriorCambioPeriodoAl deFuenteRendimiento de Bitcoin en agosto24,95%——Agosto de 20262026-08-31Investing.comInterés abierto de futuros denominados en Bitcoinaproximadamente 587.600 BTC645.800 BTC—A 25 de agosto frente al 14 de agosto de 20262026-08-25KuCoin FlashInterés abierto perpetuo antes del avance frente al nivel posterioralrededor de 312.000 BTCaproximadamente 341.000 BTCDisminución del 8,5%Agosto de 20262026-09-01DefiLlama ResearchInterés abierto perpetuo en términos de dólarescasi 26.000 millones de dólaresaproximadamente 21,9 mil millones de dólares—Antes del avance hasta el 24 de agosto de 20262026-08-24DefiLlama ResearchInterés abierto de futuros en todo el mercado en términos de monedasaproximadamente 708.000 BTCaproximadamente 737.000 BTCContracción del 3,9%Del 13 de agosto al 25 de agosto de 20262026-08-25Oracle of BTC
·
--
El RBNZ eleva las tasas al 2,75%, pero un mensaje cauto (dovish) hace que el dólar de Nueva Zelanda bajeEl Banco de la Reserva de Nueva Zelanda elevó su tipo de interés oficial (Official Cash Rate) en 25 puntos básicos hasta el 2,75% el 2 de septiembre, citando una inflación del 4,1% en el trimestre de junio de 2026. El dólar neozelandés cayó después de la decisión: el par NZD/USD bajó alrededor de un 0,6% hasta cerca de 0,586, ya que los mercados interpretaron la orientación del banco como una senda de endurecimiento menos agresiva. El RBNZ eleva el tipo de interés oficial (Official Cash Rate) a 2,75% La decisión marca la segunda subida consecutiva de 25 puntos básicos del RBNZ y el segundo aumento de la tasa en 2026, tras una subida en julio, según Investing.com, citando a Reuters. Un punto básico equivale a una centésima de un punto porcentual, lo que significa que el movimiento más reciente representa un aumento de un cuarto de punto porcentual.

El RBNZ eleva las tasas al 2,75%, pero un mensaje cauto (dovish) hace que el dólar de Nueva Zelanda baje

El Banco de la Reserva de Nueva Zelanda elevó su tipo de interés oficial (Official Cash Rate) en 25 puntos básicos hasta el 2,75% el 2 de septiembre, citando una inflación del 4,1% en el trimestre de junio de 2026. El dólar neozelandés cayó después de la decisión: el par NZD/USD bajó alrededor de un 0,6% hasta cerca de 0,586, ya que los mercados interpretaron la orientación del banco como una senda de endurecimiento menos agresiva.
El RBNZ eleva el tipo de interés oficial (Official Cash Rate) a 2,75%
La decisión marca la segunda subida consecutiva de 25 puntos básicos del RBNZ y el segundo aumento de la tasa en 2026, tras una subida en julio, según Investing.com, citando a Reuters. Un punto básico equivale a una centésima de un punto porcentual, lo que significa que el movimiento más reciente representa un aumento de un cuarto de punto porcentual.
Inicia sesión para explorar más contenidos
Únete a usuarios globales de criptomonedas en Binance Square
⚡️ Obtén información útil y actualizada sobre criptos.
💬 Avalado por el mayor exchange de criptomonedas en el mundo.
👍 Descubre perspectivas reales de creadores verificados.
Email/número de teléfono
Mapa del sitio
Preferencias de cookies
Términos y condiciones de la plataforma