The rise list has now opened the garbage coin market, and I guess this is the peak of the market. If these rise lists were replaced with older coins, like EOS or NEO, that would be the tail end of the market. Some holders are only fifty points away from breaking even and are preparing to exit; they hope this market will continue for a bit longer.
How to repair after experiencing the deep harvest of 10.11? Where should mainstream coins go after the recent global collection of BTC? In a turbulent world, with restless hearts, with shriveled wallets, in a sea of desire, if there is a heavy rain, let it pour down and awaken us. #Strategy增持比特币 #山寨季來了? #美国政府停摆
$DASH Saw ZEC launch and start a rapid surge; the first thing I thought of was DASH. DASH here has good value for money. It dropped about twenty points and then surged to double. If it doesn’t start within three days, leave. No matter the price. If it starts within three days, it’s above 50. If there’s no movement, it’s strong support at 32. Great value!
$PORTAL Please remove this garbage from the market It has been getting hammered nonstop since the opening It hasn’t gone up once Extremely disgusting Even the ecosystem before was disgusting The collateral was pledged for a long time, and the given amount still isn’t enough for the fees
Thanks, brother. I checked the Tangtu funds account and I was shocked. Awesome!
坦途
·
--
An old OG, Lao Lin, who’s been in the circle for more than a decade. Lin, the boss. Trend experts, brothers—pay attention, you won’t be at a loss. Longpeng’s cousin, the sister’s longtime friend @OxLin_老林 . Many years of friendship—we met today and I learned a great deal. x:BigLin666666
What destroys a brand is often not hackers, but tolerance. Any account that uses the banner of “Binance’s prince” for marketing or lead generation should be banned immediately and publicly clarified—not left to let public opinion keep simmering.
Many old-timers in the crypto world know this is only an internet meme, but people outside the industry and many new users have no idea what’s going on. When they see the four characters “Binance’s prince,” they can easily mistake it for having official backing from Binance—perhaps even being a relative of the founder—thus naturally generating a sense of trust.
This is exactly what’s most terrifying about marketing: using brand endorsement to create an identity illusion and harvest users’ trust.
In the short term, the traffic benefits the marketers. But once later controversies arise—scams, “harvesting” users, guide/coordination going wrong, or even illegal and违规 behavior—the public’s first reaction won’t be to hold that account accountable. Instead, they’ll just say, “How could Binance be like this?”
In the end, Binance’s brand credibility is still the one that pays the price.
For a global platform, any account that could easily be mistaken by the public as having “official identity” should be held to a zero-tolerance policy. The biggest brand risk has never been that someone is trying to ride on the heat—it’s that when the brand implicitly allows such behavior. Also, on X’s timeline, I really don’t want to see this kind of people; it’s a huge waste of time and effort.
If there are accounts like this, just directly block and ban them, and prevent them from becoming Binance users.
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.